<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points -- Ukraine-gate?  MassiveTrumpCollusion-gate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144562</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144562</guid>
		<description>Russ
199

&lt;i&gt;How’s this possible?!?! I mean, he’s a highly decorated retired law enforcement officer..except when he admitted that he wasn’t.....but...but...but, how can this be??? &lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m not sure why, but it brought to mind that time Weigantia was discussing homosexuality and whether or not it was a choice. Of course -- and not surprisingly -- Mike insisted over the objections of yourself and every other poster that it was definitely a choice because &quot;science&quot; and his intimate personal knowledge of lots of gays and his bisexual wife!

Remember that? Perhaps I could search for that and find that for you, Russ. Be right back. *theme from Jeopardy*

I couldn&#039;t find it. ----&gt; Just kidding! :)

&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;b&gt;Michale&lt;/b&gt;

Being gay is a lifestyle choice...

Nope. Not even close. [neilm]

Yep... You just don&#039;t accept the science that supports it..

Even if we disregard the science....

I have known many MANY gay people in my 54 years on this planet including family.. I know alternate lifestyles intimately.. My lovely wife is bisexual...

And I can personally attest to the fact that gay people turn it on and off like a light switch...

Being gay is no different than being a WOB or a greaser or a sosh... ~ Michael 

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/15/ftp387/#comment-74016 &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mike&#039;s inherent ignorance -- that we witness in so many of his personal anecdotal posts -- nearly always seems to go &quot;bone deep&quot;... for multiple reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
199</p>
<p><i>How’s this possible?!?! I mean, he’s a highly decorated retired law enforcement officer..except when he admitted that he wasn’t.....but...but...but, how can this be??? </i></p>
<p>I'm not sure why, but it brought to mind that time Weigantia was discussing homosexuality and whether or not it was a choice. Of course -- and not surprisingly -- Mike insisted over the objections of yourself and every other poster that it was definitely a choice because "science" and his intimate personal knowledge of lots of gays and his bisexual wife!</p>
<p>Remember that? Perhaps I could search for that and find that for you, Russ. Be right back. *theme from Jeopardy*</p>
<p>I couldn't find it. ----&gt; Just kidding! :)</p>
<blockquote><p> <b>Michale</b></p>
<p>Being gay is a lifestyle choice...</p>
<p>Nope. Not even close. [neilm]</p>
<p>Yep... You just don't accept the science that supports it..</p>
<p>Even if we disregard the science....</p>
<p>I have known many MANY gay people in my 54 years on this planet including family.. I know alternate lifestyles intimately.. My lovely wife is bisexual...</p>
<p>And I can personally attest to the fact that gay people turn it on and off like a light switch...</p>
<p>Being gay is no different than being a WOB or a greaser or a sosh... ~ Michael </p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/15/ftp387/#comment-74016" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/15/ftp387/#comment-74016</a> </p></blockquote>
<p>Mike's inherent ignorance -- that we witness in so many of his personal anecdotal posts -- nearly always seems to go "bone deep"... for multiple reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144549</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144549</guid>
		<description>Apparently, ya&#039;all have no FACTS to rebut any of my fact so you have to make the comment thread about me, personally.. :D

I can ask for no better confirmation of my domination.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, ya'all have no FACTS to rebut any of my fact so you have to make the comment thread about me, personally.. :D</p>
<p>I can ask for no better confirmation of my domination.  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144548</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144548</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;Michale is not the subject of conversation here. Chris&#039;s columns are.&lt;/I&gt;

You must be new around here.. :D

J/K  :D

Ya gotta ask yourself.  What kind of sick person goes thru ALL of the Internet trying to find dirt on someone, SOLELY because said someone has been kicking their ass in a political forum for years..

It&#039;s a good thing myself and my family are all armed..  The fact that these people stalk myself and my family on the internet indicates they are one step away from taking it to real life..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>Michale is not the subject of conversation here. Chris's columns are.</i></p>
<p>You must be new around here.. :D</p>
<p>J/K  :D</p>
<p>Ya gotta ask yourself.  What kind of sick person goes thru ALL of the Internet trying to find dirt on someone, SOLELY because said someone has been kicking their ass in a political forum for years..</p>
<p>It's a good thing myself and my family are all armed..  The fact that these people stalk myself and my family on the internet indicates they are one step away from taking it to real life..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144547</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144547</guid>
		<description>Stig,

&lt;I&gt;I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M. &lt;/I&gt;

WOW....

So, let&#039;s take stock.

I kick your ass in a political forum on a daily basis..

Not being able to handle that, you actively search the entire internet for dirt on me personally..

What kind of sick puppy searches the internet for dirt on a person SOLELY because of differences on a political forum??

And you claim *I* have issues???

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stig,</p>
<p><i>I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M. </i></p>
<p>WOW....</p>
<p>So, let's take stock.</p>
<p>I kick your ass in a political forum on a daily basis..</p>
<p>Not being able to handle that, you actively search the entire internet for dirt on me personally..</p>
<p>What kind of sick puppy searches the internet for dirt on a person SOLELY because of differences on a political forum??</p>
<p>And you claim *I* have issues???</p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144546</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144546</guid>
		<description>Russ

Also forgot to bring up the FACT that &lt;b&gt;after&lt;/b&gt; it was discovered the funds were being withheld from Ukraine and the House called for an investigation into that and then &lt;b&gt;after&lt;/b&gt; the whistleblower complaint was filed and the House thereafter called for another investigation into that, the White House suddenly had an epiphany and decided that Ukraine should get all the money being withheld right straight away BUT -- and that is a really big but -- &lt;b&gt;also&lt;/b&gt; the addition of &lt;b&gt;another&lt;/b&gt; $140 million of the taxpayers&#039; money at the direction of &quot;who the fuck knows&quot; and for reason(s) that no one has as yet explained and Congress sure as hell didn&#039;t authorize... so who did and why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ</p>
<p>Also forgot to bring up the FACT that <b>after</b> it was discovered the funds were being withheld from Ukraine and the House called for an investigation into that and then <b>after</b> the whistleblower complaint was filed and the House thereafter called for another investigation into that, the White House suddenly had an epiphany and decided that Ukraine should get all the money being withheld right straight away BUT -- and that is a really big but -- <b>also</b> the addition of <b>another</b> $140 million of the taxpayers' money at the direction of "who the fuck knows" and for reason(s) that no one has as yet explained and Congress sure as hell didn't authorize... so who did and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144543</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 05:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144543</guid>
		<description>Kick,&lt;i&gt;

I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M. Things are not as nearly as rosy at his castle as he implies.

Yes, sir... not at all unlike the inveterate moron who committed breaking and entering and theft of property of a private residence but not before leaving his unique DNA signature in the owner&#039;s toilet. :)&lt;/i&gt;

How’s this possible?!?!  I mean, he’s a highly decorated retired law enforcement officer..except when he admitted that he wasn’t.....but...but...but, how can this be???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick,<i></p>
<p>I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M. Things are not as nearly as rosy at his castle as he implies.</p>
<p>Yes, sir... not at all unlike the inveterate moron who committed breaking and entering and theft of property of a private residence but not before leaving his unique DNA signature in the owner's toilet. :)</i></p>
<p>How’s this possible?!?!  I mean, he’s a highly decorated retired law enforcement officer..except when he admitted that he wasn’t.....but...but...but, how can this be???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144541</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144541</guid>
		<description>TS
194

&lt;i&gt;I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M. Things are not as nearly as rosy at his castle as he implies. &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, sir... not at all unlike the inveterate moron who committed breaking and entering and theft of property of a private residence but not before leaving his unique DNA signature in the owner&#039;s toilet. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TS<br />
194</p>
<p><i>I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M. Things are not as nearly as rosy at his castle as he implies. </i></p>
<p>Yes, sir... not at all unlike the inveterate moron who committed breaking and entering and theft of property of a private residence but not before leaving his unique DNA signature in the owner's toilet. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144540</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144540</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth Miller
195

&lt;i&gt;Michale is not the subject of conversation here. Chris&#039;s columns are. &lt;/i&gt;

You might want to work on those reading comprehension skills, Elizabeth. We are clearly discussing the ignorant prevaricating gaslighting fake quote inventing troll whose focus is on posters individually and collectively rather than &quot;Chris&#039;s columns.&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt;* What I find funny is that no one here minded the word &quot;retarded&quot; when it&#039;s directed at President Trump. 

Many have actually USED the word or, by omission, made no comment when the word was used by others. ~ Mike at [14]  

&lt;b&gt;Also see&lt;/b&gt;:

* [21] where &quot;neilm&quot; personally is the subject of Mike&#039;s conversation rather than discussing &quot;Chris&#039;s columns.&quot;

* Multiple posts where Patrick is personally the subject of Mike&#039;s conversation rather than &quot;Chris&#039;s columns.&quot;

* Posts by Mike where Russ is personally the subject of Mike&#039;s conversation rather than discussing &quot;Chris&#039;s columns.&quot;

* Multiple posts where Mike discusses posters collectively and individually as bigots and slaves rather than discussing &quot;Chris&#039;s columns.&quot; 

Enough of that. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

If Mike&#039;s raison d&#039;être and modus operandi of repeatedly trolling individuals and making them personally the topic of conversation versus the discussion of &quot;Chris&#039;s columns&quot; were to be reflected back on Mike, that should seriously come as a revelation to &lt;b&gt;no one whatsoever&lt;/b&gt;. 

And you can keep your proclamations to yourself wherein everyone else should &quot;be an example&quot; as long as Mike continues this modus operandi bullshit of his unabated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Miller<br />
195</p>
<p><i>Michale is not the subject of conversation here. Chris's columns are. </i></p>
<p>You might want to work on those reading comprehension skills, Elizabeth. We are clearly discussing the ignorant prevaricating gaslighting fake quote inventing troll whose focus is on posters individually and collectively rather than "Chris's columns."</p>
<blockquote><p>* What I find funny is that no one here minded the word "retarded" when it's directed at President Trump. </p>
<p>Many have actually USED the word or, by omission, made no comment when the word was used by others. ~ Mike at [14]  </p>
<p><b>Also see</b>:</p>
<p>* [21] where "neilm" personally is the subject of Mike's conversation rather than discussing "Chris's columns."</p>
<p>* Multiple posts where Patrick is personally the subject of Mike's conversation rather than "Chris's columns."</p>
<p>* Posts by Mike where Russ is personally the subject of Mike's conversation rather than discussing "Chris's columns."</p>
<p>* Multiple posts where Mike discusses posters collectively and individually as bigots and slaves rather than discussing "Chris's columns." </p>
<p>Enough of that. </p></blockquote>
<p>If Mike's raison d'être and modus operandi of repeatedly trolling individuals and making them personally the topic of conversation versus the discussion of "Chris's columns" were to be reflected back on Mike, that should seriously come as a revelation to <b>no one whatsoever</b>. </p>
<p>And you can keep your proclamations to yourself wherein everyone else should "be an example" as long as Mike continues this modus operandi bullshit of his unabated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144537</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144537</guid>
		<description>Russ
171

&lt;i&gt;If what Biden is being accused of doing were true, wouldn’t it make more sense for Trump to instruct the DOJ to investigate it than to tell a foreign leader to handle it? &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;ll just confuse him with facts. 

So Trump needed to send his &lt;b&gt;personal attorney&lt;/b&gt; to Ukraine regarding so-called &quot;corruption&quot; of Ukraine and Hunter Biden? Please.   

Also, since when has Trump shown any interest in doing a damn thing about corruption in foreign government? And speaking of corruption, why such cozying up to Vladimir Putin and Russia and the easing of sanctions on Manafort&#039;s pal Deripaska to build in Moscow Mitch&#039;s State of Kentucky when it was Deripaska who paid Manafort tens of millions of dollars to further Russia&#039;s interests around the globe? Manafort wasn&#039;t just any GOP candidate&#039;s campaign manager, he was Trump&#039;s... the same Manafort who is not exactly a stranger to Ukraine and corruption. 

Deripaska, Moscow Mitch, Ukraine, Paul Manafort -- I could go on -- are all connected events and tie back to the &quot;same shit different day&quot; of Russia&#039;s interference in the affairs of the United States through Benedict Donald... the &quot;elephant in the room&quot; foreign corruption that didn&#039;t seem to motivate the decisions of either Trump or McConnell until just very recently.

Connect the dots. 

Wouldn&#039;t it be &quot;sad&quot; if Trump and McConnell&#039;s sudden interest in dealing with foreign corruption shined a giant Klieg light on foreign corruption?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
171</p>
<p><i>If what Biden is being accused of doing were true, wouldn’t it make more sense for Trump to instruct the DOJ to investigate it than to tell a foreign leader to handle it? </i></p>
<p>You'll just confuse him with facts. </p>
<p>So Trump needed to send his <b>personal attorney</b> to Ukraine regarding so-called "corruption" of Ukraine and Hunter Biden? Please.   </p>
<p>Also, since when has Trump shown any interest in doing a damn thing about corruption in foreign government? And speaking of corruption, why such cozying up to Vladimir Putin and Russia and the easing of sanctions on Manafort's pal Deripaska to build in Moscow Mitch's State of Kentucky when it was Deripaska who paid Manafort tens of millions of dollars to further Russia's interests around the globe? Manafort wasn't just any GOP candidate's campaign manager, he was Trump's... the same Manafort who is not exactly a stranger to Ukraine and corruption. </p>
<p>Deripaska, Moscow Mitch, Ukraine, Paul Manafort -- I could go on -- are all connected events and tie back to the "same shit different day" of Russia's interference in the affairs of the United States through Benedict Donald... the "elephant in the room" foreign corruption that didn't seem to motivate the decisions of either Trump or McConnell until just very recently.</p>
<p>Connect the dots. </p>
<p>Wouldn't it be "sad" if Trump and McConnell's sudden interest in dealing with foreign corruption shined a giant Klieg light on foreign corruption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144531</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144531</guid>
		<description>Michale is not the subject of conversation here. Chris&#039;s columns are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale is not the subject of conversation here. Chris's columns are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144529</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 23:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144529</guid>
		<description>Kick:

I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M.  Things are not as nearly as rosy at his castle as he implies.  He seems to be using CW.com to write a long running serialized Walter Mitty-esque novel of his life and times.  I would call this a form of self-psychiatry.  It is sad.  For both author and readers. I have a close relative who exhibits similar behaviors.  At a certain point you have write the victim off.  I learned that in rescue training...turning yourself into another victim only makes the crisis worse.  Not that excessive, long winded and frequently ill-manored comments are fatal, but the are rather annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick:</p>
<p>I was able to go online and independently verify ALL of your narrative concerning M.  Things are not as nearly as rosy at his castle as he implies.  He seems to be using CW.com to write a long running serialized Walter Mitty-esque novel of his life and times.  I would call this a form of self-psychiatry.  It is sad.  For both author and readers. I have a close relative who exhibits similar behaviors.  At a certain point you have write the victim off.  I learned that in rescue training...turning yourself into another victim only makes the crisis worse.  Not that excessive, long winded and frequently ill-manored comments are fatal, but the are rather annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144528</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144528</guid>
		<description>Awww right..

You people had yer chance.. Wife is home so now I belong to her..

See ya&#039;all bright and early in the morning.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww right..</p>
<p>You people had yer chance.. Wife is home so now I belong to her..</p>
<p>See ya'all bright and early in the morning.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144527</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144527</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Ukrainian Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko on Saturday dismissed claims that Trump pressured Zelensky during the July call, saying, “I know what the conversation was about, and there was no pressure.”&lt;/B&gt;

Once again, JUST like the Dorian/Alabama bullshit, OFFICIAL SOURCES have the FACTS..  Democrats are full of kaa-kaa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Ukrainian Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko on Saturday dismissed claims that Trump pressured Zelensky during the July call, saying, “I know what the conversation was about, and there was no pressure.”</b></p>
<p>Once again, JUST like the Dorian/Alabama bullshit, OFFICIAL SOURCES have the FACTS..  Democrats are full of kaa-kaa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144526</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144526</guid>
		<description>200???

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Fine!!! I&#039;ll do it myself!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Thanos, AVENGERS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>200???</p>
<p><b>"Fine!!! I'll do it myself!!"</b><br />
-Thanos, AVENGERS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144525</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144525</guid>
		<description>Wait a tic!!!  Where did PATRICK go!!!!

Did he run away scared!!??

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a tic!!!  Where did PATRICK go!!!!</p>
<p>Did he run away scared!!??</p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144524</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144524</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;On Saturday, Biden rejected the notion that he pressured the Ukrainian government on behalf of his son, and said, “I have never spoken with my son about his overseas business dealings.” But Hunter Biden told the New Yorker in July he and his father spoke about his business foray in Ukraine once.&lt;/b&gt;

Joe Biden caught in a LIE..

Now, LIES seem to bother you people an awful lot..

At least when it&#039;s someone with a -R after their name who is allegedly lying..

Will ya&#039;all condemn Joe Biden for his lie??

No???

Color me shocked!!   :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>On Saturday, Biden rejected the notion that he pressured the Ukrainian government on behalf of his son, and said, “I have never spoken with my son about his overseas business dealings.” But Hunter Biden told the New Yorker in July he and his father spoke about his business foray in Ukraine once.</b></p>
<p>Joe Biden caught in a LIE..</p>
<p>Now, LIES seem to bother you people an awful lot..</p>
<p>At least when it's someone with a -R after their name who is allegedly lying..</p>
<p>Will ya'all condemn Joe Biden for his lie??</p>
<p>No???</p>
<p>Color me shocked!!   :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144523</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144523</guid>
		<description>Awww, com&#039;on!!  SOMEONE drag it over 200!!  I can&#039;t do ALL the heavy lifting here!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww, com'on!!  SOMEONE drag it over 200!!  I can't do ALL the heavy lifting here!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144522</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144522</guid>
		<description>And what is so HILARIOUS about all of this is it&#039;s the DEMOCRATS who brought it all up!!!

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what is so HILARIOUS about all of this is it's the DEMOCRATS who brought it all up!!!</p>
<p>BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144521</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144521</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Biden bragged in 2018 that, as vice president, he threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not fire its top prosecutor Viktor Shokin. &lt;/B&gt;

Of course, Shokin was investigating Hunter Biden and VB Biden wanted it stopped.

So Biden withheld funds to Ukraine to fade the heat from Hunter Biden..

Joe Biden will be lucky to stay out of Prison...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Biden bragged in 2018 that, as vice president, he threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not fire its top prosecutor Viktor Shokin. </b></p>
<p>Of course, Shokin was investigating Hunter Biden and VB Biden wanted it stopped.</p>
<p>So Biden withheld funds to Ukraine to fade the heat from Hunter Biden..</p>
<p>Joe Biden will be lucky to stay out of Prison...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144520</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144520</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Sen. Lindsey Graham called on the Justice Department to investigate “all things Ukraine” Sunday amid controversy about a secretive whistleblower complaint likely regarding a phone call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president.

The South Carolina Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said he was, “hoping that the Department of Justice will look at the Biden-Ukraine connection the way that we looked at Trump-Russia connection” in a Fox News interview, and called for DOJ to appoint an investigator. Graham also brought up Republican claims that Ukrainian officials tried helping Hillary Clinton win in 2016.

Biden bragged in 2018 that, as vice president, he threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not fire its top prosecutor Viktor Shokin. Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani alleged for months that Biden wanted Shokin fired because Shokin reportedly undertook an anti-corruption investigation into Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma Holdings, which employed Joe Biden’s lobbyist son Hunter as a board member starting in 2014, reportedly paying him $50,000 a month. The Biden camp countered that Shokin was widely seen by the U.S. and Europe — and inside Ukraine — as ineffective, corrupt, and a hindrance to Ukraine’s progress. Ukraine’s parliament removed Shokin in 2016.

“We looked at all things Russia and Trump, his family, everything about his family, everything transaction between the Trump campaign and Russia. Now is time to see whether or not the Ukrainians released information regarding Paul Manafort, who was Trump’s campaign manager,&quot; Graham said. &quot;What relationships, if any, did the Biden world have with the Ukraine? What role, if any, did the Ukraine play in the 2016 election?”&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats are going down!!!!

BBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Sen. Lindsey Graham called on the Justice Department to investigate “all things Ukraine” Sunday amid controversy about a secretive whistleblower complaint likely regarding a phone call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president.</p>
<p>The South Carolina Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said he was, “hoping that the Department of Justice will look at the Biden-Ukraine connection the way that we looked at Trump-Russia connection” in a Fox News interview, and called for DOJ to appoint an investigator. Graham also brought up Republican claims that Ukrainian officials tried helping Hillary Clinton win in 2016.</p>
<p>Biden bragged in 2018 that, as vice president, he threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not fire its top prosecutor Viktor Shokin. Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani alleged for months that Biden wanted Shokin fired because Shokin reportedly undertook an anti-corruption investigation into Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma Holdings, which employed Joe Biden’s lobbyist son Hunter as a board member starting in 2014, reportedly paying him $50,000 a month. The Biden camp countered that Shokin was widely seen by the U.S. and Europe — and inside Ukraine — as ineffective, corrupt, and a hindrance to Ukraine’s progress. Ukraine’s parliament removed Shokin in 2016.</p>
<p>“We looked at all things Russia and Trump, his family, everything about his family, everything transaction between the Trump campaign and Russia. Now is time to see whether or not the Ukrainians released information regarding Paul Manafort, who was Trump’s campaign manager," Graham said. "What relationships, if any, did the Biden world have with the Ukraine? What role, if any, did the Ukraine play in the 2016 election?”</b></p>
<p>Democrats are going down!!!!</p>
<p>BBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144519</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144519</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Yea?? So???

Quote what part of them is factual and relevant or damaging..

Can ya do that??&lt;/I&gt;

I&#039;ll take that as a &quot;NO&quot;...

Once my lovely wife of almost 40 years gets home, yer time for today is up...  

Get a move on....  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yea?? So???</p>
<p>Quote what part of them is factual and relevant or damaging..</p>
<p>Can ya do that??</i></p>
<p>I'll take that as a "NO"...</p>
<p>Once my lovely wife of almost 40 years gets home, yer time for today is up...  </p>
<p>Get a move on....  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144518</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144518</guid>
		<description>And the BACKLASH begins!!!  :D


&lt;B&gt;Lindsey Graham calls for DOJ to investigate &#039;the Biden-Ukraine connection&#039;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-calls-for-doj-to-investigate-the-biden-ukraine-connection


Joe Biden will not survive.. Hunter Biden is going to prison...

And all because Trump/America haters couldn&#039;t STAND to keep losing against President Trump...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the BACKLASH begins!!!  :D</p>
<p><b>Lindsey Graham calls for DOJ to investigate 'the Biden-Ukraine connection'</b><br />
<a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-calls-for-doj-to-investigate-the-biden-ukraine-connection" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-calls-for-doj-to-investigate-the-biden-ukraine-connection</a></p>
<p>Joe Biden will not survive.. Hunter Biden is going to prison...</p>
<p>And all because Trump/America haters couldn't STAND to keep losing against President Trump...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144517</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144517</guid>
		<description>Here it is for ya in Black and White, Russ..

&lt;B&gt;Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph

Every single assertion of this paragraph isn&#039;t just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFEa8ODXUAA4X7w?format=jpg&amp;name=small
&lt;/B&gt;

This is why it&#039;s IMPOSSIBLE to take ANYTHING the hysterical Trump/American say seriously..

It&#039;s ALL bullshit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is for ya in Black and White, Russ..</p>
<p><b>Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph</p>
<p>Every single assertion of this paragraph isn't just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done.</p>
<p><a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFEa8ODXUAA4X7w?format=jpg&amp;name=small" rel="nofollow">https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFEa8ODXUAA4X7w?format=jpg&amp;name=small</a><br />
</b></p>
<p>This is why it's IMPOSSIBLE to take ANYTHING the hysterical Trump/American say seriously..</p>
<p>It's ALL bullshit...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144516</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144516</guid>
		<description>Yea??  So???

Quote what part of them is factual and relevant or damaging..

Can ya do that??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea??  So???</p>
<p>Quote what part of them is factual and relevant or damaging..</p>
<p>Can ya do that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144515</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144515</guid>
		<description>Here are the two letters the inspector General sent to Congress.  

https://www.lawfareblog.com/inspector-general-intelligence-community-letters-congressional-intelligence-committees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the two letters the inspector General sent to Congress.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.lawfareblog.com/inspector-general-intelligence-community-letters-congressional-intelligence-committees" rel="nofollow">https://www.lawfareblog.com/inspector-general-intelligence-community-letters-congressional-intelligence-committees</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144514</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144514</guid>
		<description>Yer not very good at this whole FACT thing, are ya Russ??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yer not very good at this whole FACT thing, are ya Russ??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144513</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144513</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Yes, I am using YOUR OWN &quot;fact&quot; methods on you..

So, you dispute the facts??

Finally. You ACTUALLY see the light now...

What took you so long..??? :eyeroll:&lt;/I&gt;

In other words, let&#039;s BOTH ignore &quot;anonymous sources&quot;..

If we do that, YOU have absolutely NOTHING at all and I don&#039;t NEED to have anything because you have NOTHING..

See how well that works out??

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yes, I am using YOUR OWN "fact" methods on you..</p>
<p>So, you dispute the facts??</p>
<p>Finally. You ACTUALLY see the light now...</p>
<p>What took you so long..??? :eyeroll:</i></p>
<p>In other words, let's BOTH ignore "anonymous sources"..</p>
<p>If we do that, YOU have absolutely NOTHING at all and I don't NEED to have anything because you have NOTHING..</p>
<p>See how well that works out??</p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144512</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144512</guid>
		<description>Russ, when all is said and done, this whistle blower/Ukraine bullshit is NOTHING different than your latest KAVANAUGH Accusation bullshit..

It&#039;s ALL bullshit..

Ya&#039;all are SO desperate in your hate, you&#039;ll believe ANYTHING...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, when all is said and done, this whistle blower/Ukraine bullshit is NOTHING different than your latest KAVANAUGH Accusation bullshit..</p>
<p>It's ALL bullshit..</p>
<p>Ya'all are SO desperate in your hate, you'll believe ANYTHING...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144511</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144511</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Then you say, You have nothing but 3rd hand hearsay, Russ.. when your statement came from ”a person familiar with the situation told Fox News”!&lt;/I&gt;

Yes, I am using YOUR OWN &quot;fact&quot; methods on you..

So, you dispute the facts??

Finally.  You ACTUALLY see the light now...  

What took you so long..???    :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Then you say, You have nothing but 3rd hand hearsay, Russ.. when your statement came from ”a person familiar with the situation told Fox News”!</i></p>
<p>Yes, I am using YOUR OWN "fact" methods on you..</p>
<p>So, you dispute the facts??</p>
<p>Finally.  You ACTUALLY see the light now...  </p>
<p>What took you so long..???    :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144510</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144510</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;This Georgia County allows conceal carry.. If you kill someone, just remember.  We have ONE jail and 356 Cemeteries.  Have a nice day&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

:D

Makes me proud to be an American..   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"This Georgia County allows conceal carry.. If you kill someone, just remember.  We have ONE jail and 356 Cemeteries.  Have a nice day"</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Makes me proud to be an American..   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144509</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144509</guid>
		<description>You dispute what the inspector general has told Congress claiming it is not factually accurate, then cite a statement that does not even address the inspector general’s findings to support your claim!  

Then you say, &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;You have nothing but 3rd hand hearsay, Russ..&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; when your statement came from &lt;b&gt;”a person familiar with the situation told Fox News”&lt;/b&gt;!

Do you not have any self-respect....oh wait, of course you don’t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You dispute what the inspector general has told Congress claiming it is not factually accurate, then cite a statement that does not even address the inspector general’s findings to support your claim!  </p>
<p>Then you say, <b><i>You have nothing but 3rd hand hearsay, Russ..</i></b> when your statement came from <b>”a person familiar with the situation told Fox News”</b>!</p>
<p>Do you not have any self-respect....oh wait, of course you don’t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144508</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144508</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;But in a letter last week, the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence ODNI), Jason Klitenic, wrote that the agency is protecting the whistleblower and argued the allegation does not meet the definition of &quot;urgent concern.&quot; He said the complaint &quot;concerned conduct from someone outside the intelligence community and did not relate to `intelligence activity&#039; under the DNI&#039;s supervision.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

What part of &lt;B&gt;&quot;DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF &#039;URGENT CONCERN&#039;...&quot;&lt;/B&gt; is unclear to you???

What part of &lt;B&gt;&quot;concerned conduct from someone outside the intelligence community and did not relate to `intelligence activity&#039;..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;  do you FAIL to comprehend??

You can&#039;t win, Russ.. Because all Democrats have on their side is hate, intolerance, bigotry and hysterical bullshit..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>But in a letter last week, the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence ODNI), Jason Klitenic, wrote that the agency is protecting the whistleblower and argued the allegation does not meet the definition of "urgent concern." He said the complaint "concerned conduct from someone outside the intelligence community and did not relate to `intelligence activity' under the DNI's supervision."</b></p>
<p>What part of <b>"DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF 'URGENT CONCERN'..."</b> is unclear to you???</p>
<p>What part of <b>"concerned conduct from someone outside the intelligence community and did not relate to `intelligence activity'.."</b>  do you FAIL to comprehend??</p>
<p>You can't win, Russ.. Because all Democrats have on their side is hate, intolerance, bigotry and hysterical bullshit..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144507</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144507</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;If what Biden is being accused of doing were true, wouldn’t it make more sense for Trump to instruct the DOJ to investigate it than to tell a foreign leader to handle it?&lt;/I&gt;

You do things your way, President Trump does things his way..

And all you can do is bitch and moan and whine about it.. :D

You LOSE, Russ..  AGAIN...

Democrats are, once again, just left with their dicks in their hands..

An all too familiar result for the Democrat Party.

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Once again... President Trump rulez...

Democrats droolz..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If what Biden is being accused of doing were true, wouldn’t it make more sense for Trump to instruct the DOJ to investigate it than to tell a foreign leader to handle it?</i></p>
<p>You do things your way, President Trump does things his way..</p>
<p>And all you can do is bitch and moan and whine about it.. :D</p>
<p>You LOSE, Russ..  AGAIN...</p>
<p>Democrats are, once again, just left with their dicks in their hands..</p>
<p>An all too familiar result for the Democrat Party.</p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Once again... President Trump rulez...</p>
<p>Democrats droolz..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144506</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144506</guid>
		<description>If what Biden is being accused of doing were true, wouldn’t it make more sense for Trump to instruct the DOJ to investigate it than to tell a foreign leader to handle it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If what Biden is being accused of doing were true, wouldn’t it make more sense for Trump to instruct the DOJ to investigate it than to tell a foreign leader to handle it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144505</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144505</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The inspector general, a Trump appointment, has already reviewed the whistleblower’s complaint and deemed it credible and of “urgent” importance —&lt;/I&gt;

Not factually accurate..

&lt;B&gt;The whistleblower who sparked a mounting controversy over President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president did not have “firsthand knowledge” of the conversation, a person familiar with the situation told Fox News -- even as the issue fuels impeachment calls from Democrats.&lt;/B&gt;

You have nothing but 3rd hand hearsay, Russ..

And, as with the Kavanaugh, ya fall all over yerself to condemn this action and then the FACTS make you look like an ass... 

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The inspector general, a Trump appointment, has already reviewed the whistleblower’s complaint and deemed it credible and of “urgent” importance —</i></p>
<p>Not factually accurate..</p>
<p><b>The whistleblower who sparked a mounting controversy over President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president did not have “firsthand knowledge” of the conversation, a person familiar with the situation told Fox News -- even as the issue fuels impeachment calls from Democrats.</b></p>
<p>You have nothing but 3rd hand hearsay, Russ..</p>
<p>And, as with the Kavanaugh, ya fall all over yerself to condemn this action and then the FACTS make you look like an ass... </p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144504</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144504</guid>
		<description>Here’s the one thing all of the wanna-be-mall-cop-but-couldn’t-pass-the-psych-test’s articles ignore or try to dismiss:

The inspector general, a Trump appointment, has already reviewed the whistleblower’s complaint and deemed it credible and of “urgent” importance — which requires the DNI director to notify and send the complaint and related materials to both houses’ intelligence committees within 7 days.  When that did not occur, the inspector general notified the intelligence committee chairs himself of the whistleblower complaint’s existence.   

The policy does not instruct the director to second guess his agency’s inspector general’s conclusions and take it to the DOJ, it says that he SHALL send the information to the intelligence committee chairs within 7 days.   So why won’t Trump tell his people to follow what  the law instructs them to do in these situations?   

Another thing that makes no sense:  you claim that the whistleblower allegations aren’t true at the same time you claim that what Trump is supposedly accused of doing is completely legal.   Why in the world would Trump not want the whistleblower’s allegations be made public if they are accusing Trump of doing something completely legal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the one thing all of the wanna-be-mall-cop-but-couldn’t-pass-the-psych-test’s articles ignore or try to dismiss:</p>
<p>The inspector general, a Trump appointment, has already reviewed the whistleblower’s complaint and deemed it credible and of “urgent” importance — which requires the DNI director to notify and send the complaint and related materials to both houses’ intelligence committees within 7 days.  When that did not occur, the inspector general notified the intelligence committee chairs himself of the whistleblower complaint’s existence.   </p>
<p>The policy does not instruct the director to second guess his agency’s inspector general’s conclusions and take it to the DOJ, it says that he SHALL send the information to the intelligence committee chairs within 7 days.   So why won’t Trump tell his people to follow what  the law instructs them to do in these situations?   </p>
<p>Another thing that makes no sense:  you claim that the whistleblower allegations aren’t true at the same time you claim that what Trump is supposedly accused of doing is completely legal.   Why in the world would Trump not want the whistleblower’s allegations be made public if they are accusing Trump of doing something completely legal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144503</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144503</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;LESS THAN MEETS THE EYE
Whistleblower had no ‘direct knowledge’ of Trump call; 
GOP claims Ukraine story unraveling
Source says whistleblower didn&#039;t have ‘firsthand knowledge’ of Trump call with Ukraine president&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/source-says-whistleblower-didnt-have-firsthand-knowledge-of-trump-call-with-ukraine-president

WHO could have POSSIBLY guessed that the whole whistle blower/Ukraine story would fall apart!!!???

Oh.. Wait!!   :D

This is a rinse/repeat of the NOAA/Dorian hysteria...

Gods, you would think ya&#039;all would LEARN!!!

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>LESS THAN MEETS THE EYE<br />
Whistleblower had no ‘direct knowledge’ of Trump call;<br />
GOP claims Ukraine story unraveling<br />
Source says whistleblower didn't have ‘firsthand knowledge’ of Trump call with Ukraine president</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/source-says-whistleblower-didnt-have-firsthand-knowledge-of-trump-call-with-ukraine-president" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/source-says-whistleblower-didnt-have-firsthand-knowledge-of-trump-call-with-ukraine-president</a></p>
<p>WHO could have POSSIBLY guessed that the whole whistle blower/Ukraine story would fall apart!!!???</p>
<p>Oh.. Wait!!   :D</p>
<p>This is a rinse/repeat of the NOAA/Dorian hysteria...</p>
<p>Gods, you would think ya'all would LEARN!!!</p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144502</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144502</guid>
		<description>So, Democrats??

How&#039;s that whistle blower  &quot;scandal&quot; working for ya&#039;all??

Seems to me, it&#039;s BIDEN who is having all the fallout!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Democrats??</p>
<p>How's that whistle blower  "scandal" working for ya'all??</p>
<p>Seems to me, it's BIDEN who is having all the fallout!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144501</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144501</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;My problem!!??  My problem is that Jon Snow had sex with his aunt and then KILLED her and NO ONE wants to talk about it!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Ryan Reynolds, HOBBS &amp; SHAW

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"My problem!!??  My problem is that Jon Snow had sex with his aunt and then KILLED her and NO ONE wants to talk about it!!!"</b><br />
-Ryan Reynolds, HOBBS &amp; SHAW</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144500</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144500</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;but unlike your comments on obama there&#039;s no name-calling, nor obvious fallacy&lt;/I&gt;

No???

&lt;B&gt; Republicans are totally over that shit, and have gone full-on ruthless culture war, a dynamic explored by Salon&#039;s Amanda Marcotte in her book &quot;Troll Nation&quot;:&lt;/B&gt;

Sounds like name-calling to me..

&lt;I&gt;because the language is harsher toward one side than the other it merits closer scrutiny and greater skepticism, &lt;/I&gt;

Exactly..

&lt;I&gt;but that on its own is not sufficient basis to disregard an opinion.&lt;/I&gt;

Unlike ya&#039;all who take my opinions SOOO seriously, eh?? :D

Here.... I&#039;ll help ya out..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Well.. er.. uh..  THAT&#039;S different&quot;&lt;/B&gt;  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but unlike your comments on obama there's no name-calling, nor obvious fallacy</i></p>
<p>No???</p>
<p><b> Republicans are totally over that shit, and have gone full-on ruthless culture war, a dynamic explored by Salon's Amanda Marcotte in her book "Troll Nation":</b></p>
<p>Sounds like name-calling to me..</p>
<p><i>because the language is harsher toward one side than the other it merits closer scrutiny and greater skepticism, </i></p>
<p>Exactly..</p>
<p><i>but that on its own is not sufficient basis to disregard an opinion.</i></p>
<p>Unlike ya'all who take my opinions SOOO seriously, eh?? :D</p>
<p>Here.... I'll help ya out..</p>
<p><b>"Well.. er.. uh..  THAT'S different"</b>  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144499</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144499</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Since the obvious bigotry and hatred shines thru YOUR quoted part, it&#039;s easy (and logical) to disregard the quote as it is steeped in bigotry...&lt;/i&gt;

easy perhaps, but not logical at all. you may interpret it as bigotry and bias, but unlike your comments on obama there&#039;s no name-calling, nor obvious fallacy. because the language is harsher toward one side than the other it merits closer scrutiny and greater skepticism, but that on its own is not sufficient basis to disregard an opinion.

the author&#039;s view is that politics are asymmetrical is supported by the factual evidence available, as well as by the quotation you chose from the same piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Since the obvious bigotry and hatred shines thru YOUR quoted part, it's easy (and logical) to disregard the quote as it is steeped in bigotry...</i></p>
<p>easy perhaps, but not logical at all. you may interpret it as bigotry and bias, but unlike your comments on obama there's no name-calling, nor obvious fallacy. because the language is harsher toward one side than the other it merits closer scrutiny and greater skepticism, but that on its own is not sufficient basis to disregard an opinion.</p>
<p>the author's view is that politics are asymmetrical is supported by the factual evidence available, as well as by the quotation you chose from the same piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144498</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144498</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s same ol same ol if Rush Limbaugh condemns Nancy Pelosi..

It&#039;s time to perk up and take notice if Rush Limbaugh condemns President Trump..&lt;/I&gt;

And put still ANOTHER way..

It&#039;s yawn city and same ol same ol if Democrats en masse condemn President Trump..  It&#039;s meaningless because it&#039;s nothing new..

It&#039;s time to perk up and yell, &lt;B&gt;&quot;Hoo doggie!!&lt;/B&gt; when Democrats condemn Obama..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;That shit MEANS something right there!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Eddie Murphy, DELIRIOUS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It's same ol same ol if Rush Limbaugh condemns Nancy Pelosi..</p>
<p>It's time to perk up and take notice if Rush Limbaugh condemns President Trump..</i></p>
<p>And put still ANOTHER way..</p>
<p>It's yawn city and same ol same ol if Democrats en masse condemn President Trump..  It's meaningless because it's nothing new..</p>
<p>It's time to perk up and yell, <b>"Hoo doggie!!</b> when Democrats condemn Obama..</p>
<p><b>"That shit MEANS something right there!!"</b><br />
-Eddie Murphy, DELIRIOUS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144495</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144495</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;my comment on this is that it is an exaggeration of the facts we already know about the democratic party. &lt;/I&gt;

So, you believe it IS factual, just exaggerated..

Fair enough.. I don&#039;t agree with the exaggerated part, but we are in completely agreement that it IS factual..

Now, to yours..

&lt;B&gt;the relationship between our two major parties has become asymmetrical: Democrats cling to norms and standards of a bygone era, Biden-style, and also, by their nature, are driven by principles of dialogue, reasoned discourse and compromise. LOL! Republicans are totally over that shit, and have gone full-on ruthless culture war, a dynamic explored by Salon&#039;s Amanda Marcotte in her book &quot;Troll Nation&quot;: They know they can’t win a fair fight on issues and policies, but when it comes to semiotic battles rooted in racism, nationalism and cultural division, they consistently hold the upper hand.&lt;/B&gt;

The claims of this part has to be taken with a HUGE grain of salt..  The &lt;B&gt;LOL!&lt;/B&gt; and &lt;B&gt;&quot;Republicans are totally over that shit&quot;&lt;/B&gt; are dead give always of a bigoted bias towards Republicans. Such bigotry and bias must be taken into account when accessing the factual nature of the claims..

Very similar to Liz&#039;s complaints about my use of the terms &quot;Odumbo&quot; and &quot;dumbocrats&quot;...

Since the obvious bigotry and hatred shines thru YOUR quoted part, it&#039;s easy (and logical) to disregard the quote as it is steeped in bigotry...

The part that I quoted comes across as a lot more factual as the author is actually talking about her own &quot;people&quot;... 

Just as you people quote Republicans that hate on and attack Trump as &quot;reliable&quot; sources, I can point to this part of this Democrat&#039;s commentary as more reliable than the part where she condemns the GOP..

In short, it&#039;s same ol same ol when she condemns the GOP..  &quot;yaawwwnnn What else is new&quot; type stuff..

Her assessment of the Democrat Party is a lot more credible because she IS a Democrat..

Put another way..  

It&#039;s same ol same ol if Rush Limbaugh condemns Nancy Pelosi..

It&#039;s time to perk up and take notice if Rush Limbaugh condemns President Trump..

Note, that I say &quot;condemn&quot; and not &quot;attack&quot;.. My word choice is precise and relevant..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I distinctly remember saying, &#039;Stop the bus.&#039; Not &#039;shoot the bus&#039;. &#039;*Stop* the bus.&#039; I&#039;m very particular with my words. &#039;Stop.&#039; &#039;Shoot.&#039; &#039;Stop.&#039; &#039;Shoot.&#039; Do those words sound remotely the same??&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Pagan Min</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>my comment on this is that it is an exaggeration of the facts we already know about the democratic party. </i></p>
<p>So, you believe it IS factual, just exaggerated..</p>
<p>Fair enough.. I don't agree with the exaggerated part, but we are in completely agreement that it IS factual..</p>
<p>Now, to yours..</p>
<p><b>the relationship between our two major parties has become asymmetrical: Democrats cling to norms and standards of a bygone era, Biden-style, and also, by their nature, are driven by principles of dialogue, reasoned discourse and compromise. LOL! Republicans are totally over that shit, and have gone full-on ruthless culture war, a dynamic explored by Salon's Amanda Marcotte in her book "Troll Nation": They know they can’t win a fair fight on issues and policies, but when it comes to semiotic battles rooted in racism, nationalism and cultural division, they consistently hold the upper hand.</b></p>
<p>The claims of this part has to be taken with a HUGE grain of salt..  The <b>LOL!</b> and <b>"Republicans are totally over that shit"</b> are dead give always of a bigoted bias towards Republicans. Such bigotry and bias must be taken into account when accessing the factual nature of the claims..</p>
<p>Very similar to Liz's complaints about my use of the terms "Odumbo" and "dumbocrats"...</p>
<p>Since the obvious bigotry and hatred shines thru YOUR quoted part, it's easy (and logical) to disregard the quote as it is steeped in bigotry...</p>
<p>The part that I quoted comes across as a lot more factual as the author is actually talking about her own "people"... </p>
<p>Just as you people quote Republicans that hate on and attack Trump as "reliable" sources, I can point to this part of this Democrat's commentary as more reliable than the part where she condemns the GOP..</p>
<p>In short, it's same ol same ol when she condemns the GOP..  "yaawwwnnn What else is new" type stuff..</p>
<p>Her assessment of the Democrat Party is a lot more credible because she IS a Democrat..</p>
<p>Put another way..  </p>
<p>It's same ol same ol if Rush Limbaugh condemns Nancy Pelosi..</p>
<p>It's time to perk up and take notice if Rush Limbaugh condemns President Trump..</p>
<p>Note, that I say "condemn" and not "attack".. My word choice is precise and relevant..</p>
<p><b>"I distinctly remember saying, 'Stop the bus.' Not 'shoot the bus'. '*Stop* the bus.' I'm very particular with my words. 'Stop.' 'Shoot.' 'Stop.' 'Shoot.' Do those words sound remotely the same??"</b><br />
-Pagan Min</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144494</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144494</guid>
		<description>@m[137]

okay, i&#039;ll comment on the comment you quoted:

&lt;i&gt;Conflicted about ideology and identity and deeply compromised by history, the Democratic Party is built to lose&lt;/i&gt;

my comment on this is that it is an exaggeration of the facts we already know about the democratic party. yes, democrats are conflicted about ideology and identity, substantially moreso than republicans. it&#039;s a much more diverse coalition, and with more diversity of opinion comes less unity of purpose. that drawback comes with the territory; the likelihood that any ideological stand you make may splinter a portion of your support makes it structurally more difficult to win. so, democrats sometimes snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. we can lament that fact, or we can accept it and try to win anyway. after all, democrats do win political and legislative battles from time to time.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@m[137]</p>
<p>okay, i'll comment on the comment you quoted:</p>
<p><i>Conflicted about ideology and identity and deeply compromised by history, the Democratic Party is built to lose</i></p>
<p>my comment on this is that it is an exaggeration of the facts we already know about the democratic party. yes, democrats are conflicted about ideology and identity, substantially moreso than republicans. it's a much more diverse coalition, and with more diversity of opinion comes less unity of purpose. that drawback comes with the territory; the likelihood that any ideological stand you make may splinter a portion of your support makes it structurally more difficult to win. so, democrats sometimes snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. we can lament that fact, or we can accept it and try to win anyway. after all, democrats do win political and legislative battles from time to time.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144492</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144492</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Evan Todd, who was shot during the Columbine school massacre, appeared on &quot;Fox &amp; Friends&quot; Monday to set the record straight, after he says he was misrepresented by the media with regard to his views on 2020 presidential hopeful Beto O&#039;Rourke&#039;s proposed gun ban.

Todd questioned O&#039;Rourke at an event in Colorado Thursday and stated his credentials as a shooting survivor, before asking how far he planned to take his gun ban. ABC later reported the exchange as if Todd was supporting the plan, when, in fact, he is against it.

&quot;I went to hear Beto speak and if I got the opportunity to ask him where he drew the line as far as his gun confiscation plans -- and I wanted to phrase it in a way that allowed him to speak his mind and he did, Todd said. &quot;He really is open to... banning and confiscating nearly all firearms.&quot;

He claimed members of the media turned cold when they found out he didn&#039;t support O&#039;Rourke&#039;s plan and accused them of embracing a far-left agenda.


&quot;The media, by and large, is biased and in some cases complicit with pushing the extremists&#039; far-left agenda,&quot; Todd said. &quot;There were many that were very interested in talking to me afterward. But, when they found out my true stance, they suddenly were less interested. So it&#039;s been crickets since they found out where I truly stood on the issue.&quot;

Todd was injured in 1999 when two students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, opened fire at Columbine High School in Colorado, killing 13 people and injuring 24. Harris and Klebold eventually killed themselves with gunshot wounds to the head following the massacre that left 12 students and one teacher dead.

Todd also said during his &quot;Fox &amp; Friends&quot; interview that the idea of confiscating firearms from private citizens is a personal affront and will leave millions defenseless while creating more problems than it would solve.&lt;/B&gt;

The words of a REAL shooting survivor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Evan Todd, who was shot during the Columbine school massacre, appeared on "Fox &amp; Friends" Monday to set the record straight, after he says he was misrepresented by the media with regard to his views on 2020 presidential hopeful Beto O'Rourke's proposed gun ban.</p>
<p>Todd questioned O'Rourke at an event in Colorado Thursday and stated his credentials as a shooting survivor, before asking how far he planned to take his gun ban. ABC later reported the exchange as if Todd was supporting the plan, when, in fact, he is against it.</p>
<p>"I went to hear Beto speak and if I got the opportunity to ask him where he drew the line as far as his gun confiscation plans -- and I wanted to phrase it in a way that allowed him to speak his mind and he did, Todd said. "He really is open to... banning and confiscating nearly all firearms."</p>
<p>He claimed members of the media turned cold when they found out he didn't support O'Rourke's plan and accused them of embracing a far-left agenda.</p>
<p>"The media, by and large, is biased and in some cases complicit with pushing the extremists' far-left agenda," Todd said. "There were many that were very interested in talking to me afterward. But, when they found out my true stance, they suddenly were less interested. So it's been crickets since they found out where I truly stood on the issue."</p>
<p>Todd was injured in 1999 when two students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, opened fire at Columbine High School in Colorado, killing 13 people and injuring 24. Harris and Klebold eventually killed themselves with gunshot wounds to the head following the massacre that left 12 students and one teacher dead.</p>
<p>Todd also said during his "Fox &amp; Friends" interview that the idea of confiscating firearms from private citizens is a personal affront and will leave millions defenseless while creating more problems than it would solve.</b></p>
<p>The words of a REAL shooting survivor...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144490</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144490</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all love to hear from David Hogg.. A school-shooting (so-called) &quot;survivor&quot; and his opinion on banning guns..

An opinion from kid who was on the same property, but far removed, of a school shooting..

Ya&#039;all feel his opinion has merit...

&lt;B&gt;Columbine survivor: &#039;Biased&#039; reporters didn&#039;t want to hear why I oppose Beto&#039;s gun ban&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/beto-orourke-gun-ban-columbine-survivor

How about hearing from an ACTUAL FACTUAL survivor of a school shooting.  Listen to HIS opinion on guns, which is MUCH more relevant than Hogg&#039;s..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all love to hear from David Hogg.. A school-shooting (so-called) "survivor" and his opinion on banning guns..</p>
<p>An opinion from kid who was on the same property, but far removed, of a school shooting..</p>
<p>Ya'all feel his opinion has merit...</p>
<p><b>Columbine survivor: 'Biased' reporters didn't want to hear why I oppose Beto's gun ban</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/beto-orourke-gun-ban-columbine-survivor" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/media/beto-orourke-gun-ban-columbine-survivor</a></p>
<p>How about hearing from an ACTUAL FACTUAL survivor of a school shooting.  Listen to HIS opinion on guns, which is MUCH more relevant than Hogg's..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144487</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144487</guid>
		<description>OK  Gonna take a breather and let ya&#039;all catch up.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK  Gonna take a breather and let ya'all catch up.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144486</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144486</guid>
		<description>Oh ho ho... What have we here..

&lt;B&gt;Adam Schiff threatens to defund intel community unless Trump whistleblower details disclosed&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-whistleblower-adam-schiff-intel

Get that???

Schiff-head wants to totally decimate and destroy our intelligence assets if he can&#039;t get President Trump to do Schiff-head&#039;s bidding..

If there was ever any proof needed that Democrats are hell-bent on destroying this country... This abysmal and heinous act dispels all doubts...

Democrats would rather see this country destroyed and in ruins in their Ahab-esque quest to take down the legally, fairly, freely and DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED President Of The United States...

How utterly sad and pathetic Democrats have become..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh ho ho... What have we here..</p>
<p><b>Adam Schiff threatens to defund intel community unless Trump whistleblower details disclosed</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-whistleblower-adam-schiff-intel" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-whistleblower-adam-schiff-intel</a></p>
<p>Get that???</p>
<p>Schiff-head wants to totally decimate and destroy our intelligence assets if he can't get President Trump to do Schiff-head's bidding..</p>
<p>If there was ever any proof needed that Democrats are hell-bent on destroying this country... This abysmal and heinous act dispels all doubts...</p>
<p>Democrats would rather see this country destroyed and in ruins in their Ahab-esque quest to take down the legally, fairly, freely and DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED President Of The United States...</p>
<p>How utterly sad and pathetic Democrats have become..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144485</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144485</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Ukraine ‘Bombshell’ Will Explode in Democratic Faces

They have far more to lose from the “whistleblower” scandal than does the president.&lt;/B&gt;
https://spectator.org/ukraine-bombshell-will-explode-in-democratic-faces/

Exactly... Democrats have so much more to lose than President Trump does..

I mean, let&#039;s face the facts..  The WORST that could happen is that President Trump is exposed for acting like President Trump..

Any and all revelations Democrats can make about President Trump are old hat and already well known..

The ONLY people who will care about President Trump&#039;s shenanigans is the Trump/America haters who would never vote for Trump anyways.. They would vote for Hitler incarnate before they would vote for Trump..

So, what THEY think doesn&#039;t matter because their minds are made up and closed..

But the people **WILL** care about the criminal activities of Joe and Hunter Biden...

THOSE crimes will matter a great deal to the Independents and NPAs...

In short, President Trump might get singed a little. MORE likely is that Americans will like it when President Trump plays hard ball and Trump support will likely increase..

But Democrats??  They are running as the NOT TRUMP candidate..

What will it do Democrat support amongst Independents and NPAs when it&#039;s out in the wild that Democrats AREN&#039;T better than Trump as they claim.

What will happen when the Independents and NPAs find out that Democrats are no better than Trump and that they LIED about it when they claimed they were..

Tens of millions of new votes for President Trump..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;{Democrats}.... chose poorly&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Knight, INDIANA JONES AND THE LAST CRUSADE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Ukraine ‘Bombshell’ Will Explode in Democratic Faces</p>
<p>They have far more to lose from the “whistleblower” scandal than does the president.</b><br />
<a href="https://spectator.org/ukraine-bombshell-will-explode-in-democratic-faces/" rel="nofollow">https://spectator.org/ukraine-bombshell-will-explode-in-democratic-faces/</a></p>
<p>Exactly... Democrats have so much more to lose than President Trump does..</p>
<p>I mean, let's face the facts..  The WORST that could happen is that President Trump is exposed for acting like President Trump..</p>
<p>Any and all revelations Democrats can make about President Trump are old hat and already well known..</p>
<p>The ONLY people who will care about President Trump's shenanigans is the Trump/America haters who would never vote for Trump anyways.. They would vote for Hitler incarnate before they would vote for Trump..</p>
<p>So, what THEY think doesn't matter because their minds are made up and closed..</p>
<p>But the people **WILL** care about the criminal activities of Joe and Hunter Biden...</p>
<p>THOSE crimes will matter a great deal to the Independents and NPAs...</p>
<p>In short, President Trump might get singed a little. MORE likely is that Americans will like it when President Trump plays hard ball and Trump support will likely increase..</p>
<p>But Democrats??  They are running as the NOT TRUMP candidate..</p>
<p>What will it do Democrat support amongst Independents and NPAs when it's out in the wild that Democrats AREN'T better than Trump as they claim.</p>
<p>What will happen when the Independents and NPAs find out that Democrats are no better than Trump and that they LIED about it when they claimed they were..</p>
<p>Tens of millions of new votes for President Trump..</p>
<p><b>"{Democrats}.... chose poorly"</b><br />
-Knight, INDIANA JONES AND THE LAST CRUSADE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144484</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144484</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a twist..

I am totally and completely on topic with my comments!!

How about that!??  :D hehehehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a twist..</p>
<p>I am totally and completely on topic with my comments!!</p>
<p>How about that!??  :D hehehehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144483</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144483</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The latest ____________________ is yet another nothing burger, yet another faceplant, yet another exercise in ritual suicide by a despondent and broken elite that still cannot come to terms with its utter rejection by the American people. Yeah, Americans are going to be super upset that Trump thought that this Democrat dynasty of gypsies, tramps and thieves ought to be held accountable for its crimes. Go with that, Dems. Please. Hey, your losing streak can’t last forever.

Can it?&lt;/B&gt;

Democrat losing streak will come to an end when they wise up and start looking out for the country instead of their own crazy Anti-America agenda..

Yea.. I guess the Democrat losing streak CAN last forever..


&lt;B&gt;Wondering what America is like if the elite can toss out an elected president because he refuses to play ball for Team Lib? Then check out my action-packed yet hilarious novels,   People&#039;s Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. The fake conservative grifter doofuses whine that my books are “appalling,” thereby providing the lead blurb for Book IV (coming soon)!&lt;/B&gt;

I can vouch for Mr Schlichter&#039;s fine Kelley Turnbull novels.. They are great reads!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The latest ____________________ is yet another nothing burger, yet another faceplant, yet another exercise in ritual suicide by a despondent and broken elite that still cannot come to terms with its utter rejection by the American people. Yeah, Americans are going to be super upset that Trump thought that this Democrat dynasty of gypsies, tramps and thieves ought to be held accountable for its crimes. Go with that, Dems. Please. Hey, your losing streak can’t last forever.</p>
<p>Can it?</b></p>
<p>Democrat losing streak will come to an end when they wise up and start looking out for the country instead of their own crazy Anti-America agenda..</p>
<p>Yea.. I guess the Democrat losing streak CAN last forever..</p>
<p><b>Wondering what America is like if the elite can toss out an elected president because he refuses to play ball for Team Lib? Then check out my action-packed yet hilarious novels,   People's Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. The fake conservative grifter doofuses whine that my books are “appalling,” thereby providing the lead blurb for Book IV (coming soon)!</b></p>
<p>I can vouch for Mr Schlichter's fine Kelley Turnbull novels.. They are great reads!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144482</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144482</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;So, this scandalabra is certainly, absolutely, definitely gonna do Trump in, and we can count on that because we have the usual lib suspects telling us so. The WaPo is assuring its eternally unsatisfied readers that yes, yes, this might be it! The Twitter blue check brain trust is weighing in that this is serious, so very serious! And Seth Abramson is probably still adding to his 678-tweet threat on how this is more emoluments and more Putin collusion and how this means the coming of the Supreme Court Marshal to arrest Trump for treason and the voices, the voices…


Oh, and there’s more impeachment babble – that’s the other scheme that has these nimrods gleefully tenting their soft, spindly fingers. You dummies. Here’s how impeachment goes. Pelosi gets head-locked by her commie caucus into allowing that circus to commence and you have that Willy Wonka worker reject Jerry Nadler plus Ed Buck’s bestie Adam Schiff ringleading it. When the persecution rests, the Republican defense stands up and says, “The President calls to the stand…Joe Biden and all the other Biden princelings and courtiers.” And then the Democrats freak and refuse to allow it and the Republicans say, not without a point, that impeaching Trump because he wanted a crime investigated kind of puts that crime at issue. But the Democrats will squelch the whole line of inquiry and normal Americans will cast some serious collective side-eye at that manifest cover-up. 

Then the Dems will vote to impeach and it goes to the Senate, where Cocaine Mitch ensures that the Biden’s dirty laundry gets a nice long airing before putting it to a vote. Then 50 Republicans vote to acquit, with only Mitt Romney insisting on further humiliating himself by siding with the Dems. Next, Trump strolls down from Capitol Hill with a necklace made of the skulls of his enemies and defeats Big Chief Sitting Bolshevik (or whichever other Dem who is not Joe Biden runs against him) next November.&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats need to think long and hard as to whether they want to pursue this course of action...

Because if they do.. It&#039;s extremely likely that it will go down just as Mr Schlichter postulates it will..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>So, this scandalabra is certainly, absolutely, definitely gonna do Trump in, and we can count on that because we have the usual lib suspects telling us so. The WaPo is assuring its eternally unsatisfied readers that yes, yes, this might be it! The Twitter blue check brain trust is weighing in that this is serious, so very serious! And Seth Abramson is probably still adding to his 678-tweet threat on how this is more emoluments and more Putin collusion and how this means the coming of the Supreme Court Marshal to arrest Trump for treason and the voices, the voices…</p>
<p>Oh, and there’s more impeachment babble – that’s the other scheme that has these nimrods gleefully tenting their soft, spindly fingers. You dummies. Here’s how impeachment goes. Pelosi gets head-locked by her commie caucus into allowing that circus to commence and you have that Willy Wonka worker reject Jerry Nadler plus Ed Buck’s bestie Adam Schiff ringleading it. When the persecution rests, the Republican defense stands up and says, “The President calls to the stand…Joe Biden and all the other Biden princelings and courtiers.” And then the Democrats freak and refuse to allow it and the Republicans say, not without a point, that impeaching Trump because he wanted a crime investigated kind of puts that crime at issue. But the Democrats will squelch the whole line of inquiry and normal Americans will cast some serious collective side-eye at that manifest cover-up. </p>
<p>Then the Dems will vote to impeach and it goes to the Senate, where Cocaine Mitch ensures that the Biden’s dirty laundry gets a nice long airing before putting it to a vote. Then 50 Republicans vote to acquit, with only Mitt Romney insisting on further humiliating himself by siding with the Dems. Next, Trump strolls down from Capitol Hill with a necklace made of the skulls of his enemies and defeats Big Chief Sitting Bolshevik (or whichever other Dem who is not Joe Biden runs against him) next November.</b></p>
<p>Democrats need to think long and hard as to whether they want to pursue this course of action...</p>
<p>Because if they do.. It's extremely likely that it will go down just as Mr Schlichter postulates it will..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144481</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144481</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;This is the problem when you have an in-bred elite that dwells in a pinko bubble of corruption n’ entitlement. They think stupid things and end up resurrecting issues they otherwise could have buried. Weren’t they just howling about how doing deals with Ukrainians was a bad thing when Paul Manafort did them? It’s nuts to believe that people who live on the dismal side of I-495 are going to think Trump is the bad guy for trying to shine a spotlight on a family of Delaware looters. 

A (disputed) twist in the narrative is that Trump offered, or threatened to withhold, something if the Ukes refused to cooperate in using their government’s power to assist a sitting US president against a presidential candidate of the other party. It apparently again became a wrong thing to ask a foreign government to use its power to assist a sitting US president against a presidential candidate of the other party, probably on January 20, 2017. 

And of course, noted particle physicist Joe – because he’s smart – is on video bragging about how he told the Ukrainians that unless they fired a nosy prosecutor who was poking around sonny’s company they could wave dasvidaniya to a US loan. So, the whole extortion argument is…awkward. &lt;/B&gt;

It&#039;s funny..

You people are saying that President Trump extorting the Ukraine government is the worst thing about this &quot;scandal&quot;..

And yet, you have NO FACTS to support the claim of extortion..

NO FACTS...

But wait.  We ***DO*** have facts that the Obama Administration DID extort the Ukraine government..

Joe Biden&#039;s **OWN** confession of doing JUST THAT..

So, for the record..  

&lt;B&gt;IS IT A BAD THING FOR A US ADMINISTRATION TO EXTORT  A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO ACHIEVE A POLITICAL AGENDA??&lt;/B&gt;

It&#039;s a simple YES/NO question..

Bet NO ONE here can answer it..  

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This is the problem when you have an in-bred elite that dwells in a pinko bubble of corruption n’ entitlement. They think stupid things and end up resurrecting issues they otherwise could have buried. Weren’t they just howling about how doing deals with Ukrainians was a bad thing when Paul Manafort did them? It’s nuts to believe that people who live on the dismal side of I-495 are going to think Trump is the bad guy for trying to shine a spotlight on a family of Delaware looters. </p>
<p>A (disputed) twist in the narrative is that Trump offered, or threatened to withhold, something if the Ukes refused to cooperate in using their government’s power to assist a sitting US president against a presidential candidate of the other party. It apparently again became a wrong thing to ask a foreign government to use its power to assist a sitting US president against a presidential candidate of the other party, probably on January 20, 2017. </p>
<p>And of course, noted particle physicist Joe – because he’s smart – is on video bragging about how he told the Ukrainians that unless they fired a nosy prosecutor who was poking around sonny’s company they could wave dasvidaniya to a US loan. So, the whole extortion argument is…awkward. </b></p>
<p>It's funny..</p>
<p>You people are saying that President Trump extorting the Ukraine government is the worst thing about this "scandal"..</p>
<p>And yet, you have NO FACTS to support the claim of extortion..</p>
<p>NO FACTS...</p>
<p>But wait.  We ***DO*** have facts that the Obama Administration DID extort the Ukraine government..</p>
<p>Joe Biden's **OWN** confession of doing JUST THAT..</p>
<p>So, for the record..  </p>
<p><b>IS IT A BAD THING FOR A US ADMINISTRATION TO EXTORT  A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO ACHIEVE A POLITICAL AGENDA??</b></p>
<p>It's a simple YES/NO question..</p>
<p>Bet NO ONE here can answer it..  </p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144480</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144480</guid>
		<description>And now for a musical interlude.. :D


&lt;B&gt;Christmas Morning..&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNkniZU4VsA

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now for a musical interlude.. :D</p>
<p><b>Christmas Morning..</b><br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNkniZU4VsA" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNkniZU4VsA</a></p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144479</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144479</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;You see, the problem with making the latest THIS WILL DO IN TRUMP! moment out of the President’s alleged attempt to investigate corruption by the Biden family is that it brings to the fore a scandal that the mainstream media has carefully covered up during the marathon of gaffes that has been Gropey J’s nomination campaign, i.e.that the Biden clan has obviously made a fortune exploiting HairPlug One’s elected offices. There’s no other explanation for their amazing success. Absolutely no one is thinking, &lt;I&gt;“Well, the Bidens are a smart family of cunning and shrewd thinkers who totally could have scored these huge windfalls in Ukraine (and China too) even if Joe had not been a DC power-player for nearly 50 years.”&lt;/I&gt;

What’s hysterical is the blindness of these DC dummies who find it unsporting of Trump to call out the sordid corruption of their fellow grifters. Remember, they admire the Bidens. This kind of primo scam is what these swampies aspire to. And they actually believe that regular folks are going to think, &lt;I&gt;“That’s not cricket! How dare that upstart Trump queer the Bidens’ deals!”&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats chose VERY poorly when they decided to make hay out of this twice removed anonymous claim about President Trump&#039;s actions.

Hell, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if it&#039;s President Trump who is the &quot;whistle blower&quot; and this is some sort of elaborate mindfrak to blow Joe Biden out of the water and make Democrats look like idiots AGAIN..

This is the exact kind of 5th Level Machinations that President Trump would do..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>You see, the problem with making the latest THIS WILL DO IN TRUMP! moment out of the President’s alleged attempt to investigate corruption by the Biden family is that it brings to the fore a scandal that the mainstream media has carefully covered up during the marathon of gaffes that has been Gropey J’s nomination campaign, i.e.that the Biden clan has obviously made a fortune exploiting HairPlug One’s elected offices. There’s no other explanation for their amazing success. Absolutely no one is thinking, <i>“Well, the Bidens are a smart family of cunning and shrewd thinkers who totally could have scored these huge windfalls in Ukraine (and China too) even if Joe had not been a DC power-player for nearly 50 years.”</i></p>
<p>What’s hysterical is the blindness of these DC dummies who find it unsporting of Trump to call out the sordid corruption of their fellow grifters. Remember, they admire the Bidens. This kind of primo scam is what these swampies aspire to. And they actually believe that regular folks are going to think, <i>“That’s not cricket! How dare that upstart Trump queer the Bidens’ deals!”</i></b></p>
<p>Democrats chose VERY poorly when they decided to make hay out of this twice removed anonymous claim about President Trump's actions.</p>
<p>Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if it's President Trump who is the "whistle blower" and this is some sort of elaborate mindfrak to blow Joe Biden out of the water and make Democrats look like idiots AGAIN..</p>
<p>This is the exact kind of 5th Level Machinations that President Trump would do..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144478</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144478</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The second most recent act in the endless fail-a-thon that is the elite’s hysterical reaction to the rise of Donald Trump was a gambit by the Stop the Hammering guy( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POlkvexe2nk ).

Lawrence O’Donnell claimed he had dirt about Russians controlling Trump because they co-signed some of his loans. He had nothing. Putting aside that when someone guarantees your debts you have leverage over him, Larry the Laughingstock had to apologize when his baloney turned to Schiff. 

MC Hammered should have known that when it comes to Trump, you can’t touch this. But these leftist toadies never, ever learn.

So now, some deep state dirtbag has decided he can end-run classification (sound familiar?) and executive privilege and narc out The Donald to the House Dems by leveraging the whistleblower statutes. And what is the subject of said narcage? Allegedly, Trump told the Ukrainians that they should investigate why Joe Biden’s kid and brothers ended up with hugely lucrative sweetheart deals in that notorious Slavic cesspool of corruption.

To which Normal Americans reacted by asking, “Wait, Joe Biden’s kid and brothers ended up with hugely lucrative sweetheart deals in that notorious Slavic cesspool of corruption?” &lt;/B&gt;

Like I said.. Independents and NPAs are going to ask themselves about Hunter Biden&#039;s and Joe Biden&#039;s actions..  They won&#039;t care about President Trump&#039;s actions to get the FACTS on the corruption of the Bidens.. Hell, President Trump&#039;s support will possibly INCREASE over this..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The second most recent act in the endless fail-a-thon that is the elite’s hysterical reaction to the rise of Donald Trump was a gambit by the Stop the Hammering guy( <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POlkvexe2nk" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POlkvexe2nk</a> ).</p>
<p>Lawrence O’Donnell claimed he had dirt about Russians controlling Trump because they co-signed some of his loans. He had nothing. Putting aside that when someone guarantees your debts you have leverage over him, Larry the Laughingstock had to apologize when his baloney turned to Schiff. </p>
<p>MC Hammered should have known that when it comes to Trump, you can’t touch this. But these leftist toadies never, ever learn.</p>
<p>So now, some deep state dirtbag has decided he can end-run classification (sound familiar?) and executive privilege and narc out The Donald to the House Dems by leveraging the whistleblower statutes. And what is the subject of said narcage? Allegedly, Trump told the Ukrainians that they should investigate why Joe Biden’s kid and brothers ended up with hugely lucrative sweetheart deals in that notorious Slavic cesspool of corruption.</p>
<p>To which Normal Americans reacted by asking, “Wait, Joe Biden’s kid and brothers ended up with hugely lucrative sweetheart deals in that notorious Slavic cesspool of corruption?” </b></p>
<p>Like I said.. Independents and NPAs are going to ask themselves about Hunter Biden's and Joe Biden's actions..  They won't care about President Trump's actions to get the FACTS on the corruption of the Bidens.. Hell, President Trump's support will possibly INCREASE over this..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144477</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144477</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;“Well, ________________ is going to totally be the thing that lets us crucify Trump! Yeah, Russia flopped and his alleged Nazi-ness failed and that weasel ex-lawyer/convict of his struck out, but we promise – this time, ___________ is going to bring him down!”&lt;/I&gt;

So saith CNN, the Times, the gang at LonelyNeckbeardedLeftistLoser.com and the rest of the cabinboy media, along with the carb-curious Fredocon dorks and the surviving furries, pseudo-Cherokees and other assorted Democrat weirdos currently wandering about in Iowa pestering farmers to join them for selfies. There’s always a new _____________, except the “bring him down” part just never seems to happen. 

No coffee for the liberal establishment, because coffee is for closers (NSFW language, sissies). These geebos have been trying to close the deal since 2015, but all they have to do it with are the Rio Rancho leads – they never get the Glengarry leads that will put a stake through the heart of the Bad Orange Man.&lt;/B&gt;

It&#039;s really amazing..

How many times do the Trump/America haters have to FAIL... FAIL... IMPRESSIVELY FAIL before they begin to realize that it&#039;s NOT President Trump.. It&#039;s THEM...

I mean, seriously.. How many times??

&lt;B&gt;&quot;At least once more, Ms Swann&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Orlando Bloom, POTC THE BLACK PEARL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><i>“Well, ________________ is going to totally be the thing that lets us crucify Trump! Yeah, Russia flopped and his alleged Nazi-ness failed and that weasel ex-lawyer/convict of his struck out, but we promise – this time, ___________ is going to bring him down!”</i></p>
<p>So saith CNN, the Times, the gang at LonelyNeckbeardedLeftistLoser.com and the rest of the cabinboy media, along with the carb-curious Fredocon dorks and the surviving furries, pseudo-Cherokees and other assorted Democrat weirdos currently wandering about in Iowa pestering farmers to join them for selfies. There’s always a new _____________, except the “bring him down” part just never seems to happen. </p>
<p>No coffee for the liberal establishment, because coffee is for closers (NSFW language, sissies). These geebos have been trying to close the deal since 2015, but all they have to do it with are the Rio Rancho leads – they never get the Glengarry leads that will put a stake through the heart of the Bad Orange Man.</b></p>
<p>It's really amazing..</p>
<p>How many times do the Trump/America haters have to FAIL... FAIL... IMPRESSIVELY FAIL before they begin to realize that it's NOT President Trump.. It's THEM...</p>
<p>I mean, seriously.. How many times??</p>
<p><b>"At least once more, Ms Swann"</b><br />
-Orlando Bloom, POTC THE BLACK PEARL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144476</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144476</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;This Will Totally Destroy Trump! (Volume MCXXXVII)&lt;/B&gt;
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2019/09/23/this-will-totally-destroy-trump-volume-mcxxxvii-n2553455

Ahh yes.. The indomitable Kurt Schlichter..

The Chris Weigant Of The Right..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This Will Totally Destroy Trump! (Volume MCXXXVII)</b><br />
<a href="https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2019/09/23/this-will-totally-destroy-trump-volume-mcxxxvii-n2553455" rel="nofollow">https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2019/09/23/this-will-totally-destroy-trump-volume-mcxxxvii-n2553455</a></p>
<p>Ahh yes.. The indomitable Kurt Schlichter..</p>
<p>The Chris Weigant Of The Right..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144475</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144475</guid>
		<description>And lo and behold, we hear from the Ukrainian Foreign Minister who backs up EVERYTHING President Trump has said..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Ukraine Foreign Minister disputes reports of any pressure from Trump. This conversation was long, friendly, and it touched on many questions.” @NBCNews  Correct. If your looking for something done wrong, just look at the tape of Sleepy Joe. He is being protected by the Media!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-President Donald Trump


Just like ya&#039;all&#039;s NOAA/DORIAN fizzle...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Fizzle my shizzle&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Snoop Dog

....  this is ANOTHER case where Democrats scream and rant and rave about total bullshit and then the FACTS rear up and bitch slap Democrats to hell..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And lo and behold, we hear from the Ukrainian Foreign Minister who backs up EVERYTHING President Trump has said..</p>
<p><b>"Ukraine Foreign Minister disputes reports of any pressure from Trump. This conversation was long, friendly, and it touched on many questions.” @NBCNews  Correct. If your looking for something done wrong, just look at the tape of Sleepy Joe. He is being protected by the Media!"</b><br />
-President Donald Trump</p>
<p>Just like ya'all's NOAA/DORIAN fizzle...</p>
<p><b>"Fizzle my shizzle"</b><br />
-Snoop Dog</p>
<p>....  this is ANOTHER case where Democrats scream and rant and rave about total bullshit and then the FACTS rear up and bitch slap Democrats to hell..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144474</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144474</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Thread
Conversation
Ryan Saavedra
@RealSaavedra
Joe Biden brags about how he threatened to pull $1 billion in loan guarantees from Ukraine if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.

The prosecutor, who was fired, was leading a corruption investigation into a company that employed Biden&#039;s son, Hunter&lt;/B&gt;

Biden&#039;s OWN WORDS on the subject..

&lt;B&gt;“I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money&#039;.
Well, son of a bitch, he got fired.”&lt;/B&gt;
-Joe Biden

Do ya&#039;all want to see the Youtube video of the quote???

Would it change anything regarding ya&#039;all&#039;s delusional denial??

Once again...  President Trump may be hurt a bit on this..

But Joe Biden is going down and Hunter Biden is going to prison...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Thread<br />
Conversation<br />
Ryan Saavedra<br />
@RealSaavedra<br />
Joe Biden brags about how he threatened to pull $1 billion in loan guarantees from Ukraine if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.</p>
<p>The prosecutor, who was fired, was leading a corruption investigation into a company that employed Biden's son, Hunter</b></p>
<p>Biden's OWN WORDS on the subject..</p>
<p><b>“I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money'.<br />
Well, son of a bitch, he got fired.”</b><br />
-Joe Biden</p>
<p>Do ya'all want to see the Youtube video of the quote???</p>
<p>Would it change anything regarding ya'all's delusional denial??</p>
<p>Once again...  President Trump may be hurt a bit on this..</p>
<p>But Joe Biden is going down and Hunter Biden is going to prison...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144473</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144473</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Just like the Russian collusion hoax, there&#039;s no evidence of this yet, but that isn&#039;t stopping people like Hillary from making her allegation, or others declaring an incident they know nothing about an impeachable offense. In March 2012, Barack Obama was caught on a live microphone whispering to then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he needed Russia to give him space on issues such as missile defense, before adding: &quot;This is my last election, after my election, I have more flexibility.” It was on tape, but few in the media cared. Some even defended Obama, but generally, it was treated as much ado about nothing. As of this moment, all we have is speculation about Trump, and the media is once again calling for impeachment.


So far, all we know is that the whistleblower at the heart of this situation didn&#039;t actually overhear anything. The one thing we do know is that in 2016, Joe Biden successfully pressured then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to ax the country&#039;s top prosecutor, who was investigating his son&#039;s company, by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees. Biden even bragged about it.&lt;/B&gt;

Yep.. None of ya&#039;all have ANY **FACTS** to support ya&#039;all&#039;s claim..  

NO FACTS...

NONE.. ZERO... ZILCH... NADA... NOTHING..

NO FACTS..

But what do we DO have facts on??

Joe Biden used the office of the VP to extort a sovereign government for the purposes of fading the criminal heat from his son..

THIS IS ESTABLISHED AS FACT..

How do we know this is fact?? Because Joe Biden confessed to the crime..

Like I said.. President Trump might be singed a little bit.. Probably not, but might.

But this is definitely going to DESTROY Joe Biden..

And ya&#039;all will have helped to that.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Just like the Russian collusion hoax, there's no evidence of this yet, but that isn't stopping people like Hillary from making her allegation, or others declaring an incident they know nothing about an impeachable offense. In March 2012, Barack Obama was caught on a live microphone whispering to then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he needed Russia to give him space on issues such as missile defense, before adding: "This is my last election, after my election, I have more flexibility.” It was on tape, but few in the media cared. Some even defended Obama, but generally, it was treated as much ado about nothing. As of this moment, all we have is speculation about Trump, and the media is once again calling for impeachment.</p>
<p>So far, all we know is that the whistleblower at the heart of this situation didn't actually overhear anything. The one thing we do know is that in 2016, Joe Biden successfully pressured then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to ax the country's top prosecutor, who was investigating his son's company, by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees. Biden even bragged about it.</b></p>
<p>Yep.. None of ya'all have ANY **FACTS** to support ya'all's claim..  </p>
<p>NO FACTS...</p>
<p>NONE.. ZERO... ZILCH... NADA... NOTHING..</p>
<p>NO FACTS..</p>
<p>But what do we DO have facts on??</p>
<p>Joe Biden used the office of the VP to extort a sovereign government for the purposes of fading the criminal heat from his son..</p>
<p>THIS IS ESTABLISHED AS FACT..</p>
<p>How do we know this is fact?? Because Joe Biden confessed to the crime..</p>
<p>Like I said.. President Trump might be singed a little bit.. Probably not, but might.</p>
<p>But this is definitely going to DESTROY Joe Biden..</p>
<p>And ya'all will have helped to that.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144472</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144472</guid>
		<description>Oops

&lt;B&gt;All the reactions to the story since have been based on speculation as to what occurred on the call. Trump is alleged to have pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and offered a quid pro quo... which, according to the Wall Street Journal, there wasn&#039;t:

President Trump in a July phone call repeatedly pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden ’s son, urging Volodymyr Zelensky about eight times to work with Rudy Giuliani, his personal lawyer, on a probe, according to people familiar with the matter.
“He told him that he should work with [Mr. Giuliani] on Biden, and that people in Washington wanted to know” whether allegations were true or not, one of the people said. Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

Nevertheless, if you can dream it, someone is alleging it. Even Hillary Clinton has chimed in with an eye-roll-worthy tweet:

&lt;I&gt;The president asked a foreign power to help him win an election.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;

Get that?? Hillary is complaining that President Trump did **EXACTLY** what she did in the 2016 election..

Again pointing out that if Democrats didn&#039;t have double standards, they would have no standards at all..

:eyeroll:

Much better..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops</p>
<p><b>All the reactions to the story since have been based on speculation as to what occurred on the call. Trump is alleged to have pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and offered a quid pro quo... which, according to the Wall Street Journal, there wasn't:</p>
<p>President Trump in a July phone call repeatedly pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden ’s son, urging Volodymyr Zelensky about eight times to work with Rudy Giuliani, his personal lawyer, on a probe, according to people familiar with the matter.<br />
“He told him that he should work with [Mr. Giuliani] on Biden, and that people in Washington wanted to know” whether allegations were true or not, one of the people said. Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…</p>
<p>Nevertheless, if you can dream it, someone is alleging it. Even Hillary Clinton has chimed in with an eye-roll-worthy tweet:</p>
<p><i>The president asked a foreign power to help him win an election.</i></b></p>
<p>Get that?? Hillary is complaining that President Trump did **EXACTLY** what she did in the 2016 election..</p>
<p>Again pointing out that if Democrats didn't have double standards, they would have no standards at all..</p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
<p>Much better..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144471</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144471</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;All the reactions to the story since have been based on speculation as to what occurred on the call. Trump is alleged to have pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and offered a quid pro quo... which, according to the Wall Street Journal, there wasn&#039;t:

President Trump in a July phone call repeatedly pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden ’s son, urging Volodymyr Zelensky about eight times to work with Rudy Giuliani, his personal lawyer, on a probe, according to people familiar with the matter.
“He told him that he should work with [Mr. Giuliani] on Biden, and that people in Washington wanted to know” whether allegations were true or not, one of the people said. Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

Nevertheless, if you can dream it, someone is alleging it. Even Hillary Clinton has chimed in with an eye-roll-worthy tweet:

The president asked a foreign power to help him win an election.&lt;B&gt;

Get that??  Hillary is complaining that President Trump did **EXACTLY** what she did in the 2016 election..

Again pointing out that if Democrats didn&#039;t have double standards, they would have no standards at all..

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>All the reactions to the story since have been based on speculation as to what occurred on the call. Trump is alleged to have pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and offered a quid pro quo... which, according to the Wall Street Journal, there wasn't:</p>
<p>President Trump in a July phone call repeatedly pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden ’s son, urging Volodymyr Zelensky about eight times to work with Rudy Giuliani, his personal lawyer, on a probe, according to people familiar with the matter.<br />
“He told him that he should work with [Mr. Giuliani] on Biden, and that people in Washington wanted to know” whether allegations were true or not, one of the people said. Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…</p>
<p>Nevertheless, if you can dream it, someone is alleging it. Even Hillary Clinton has chimed in with an eye-roll-worthy tweet:</p>
<p>The president asked a foreign power to help him win an election.</b><b></p>
<p>Get that??  Hillary is complaining that President Trump did **EXACTLY** what she did in the 2016 election..</p>
<p>Again pointing out that if Democrats didn't have double standards, they would have no standards at all..</p>
<p>:eyeroll:</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144470</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144470</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;In fact, CNN reported this fact, but buried it in an article:

The whistleblower didn&#039;t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower&#039;s concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration&#039;s determination that the complaint didn&#039;t fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.
Schow noted, &quot;this is yet another anonymous source giving more context on what another anonymous source told a different outlet, but it still calls the entire story into question.&quot; The original Washington Post story, despite being on the front page, was vague, relying on “two former U.S. officials familiar with the matter” who were “speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.&quot; They alleged that Trump had made a “promise” to a world leader—which, based on what we know right now, is incorrect.&lt;/B&gt;

Look at that??

&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;didn&#039;t have direct knowledge of the communications,

yet another anonymous source

on what another anonymous source told a different outlet,

“speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt;

And ya&#039;all devote an ENTIRE commentary and comments to ^^^^^THAT!!!????

MIND BOGGLING!!  Completely and utterly MIND-BOGGLING!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In fact, CNN reported this fact, but buried it in an article:</p>
<p>The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.<br />
Schow noted, "this is yet another anonymous source giving more context on what another anonymous source told a different outlet, but it still calls the entire story into question." The original Washington Post story, despite being on the front page, was vague, relying on “two former U.S. officials familiar with the matter” who were “speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly." They alleged that Trump had made a “promise” to a world leader—which, based on what we know right now, is incorrect.</b></p>
<p>Look at that??</p>
<p><b><i>didn't have direct knowledge of the communications,</p>
<p>yet another anonymous source</p>
<p>on what another anonymous source told a different outlet,</p>
<p>“speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly."</i></b></p>
<p>And ya'all devote an ENTIRE commentary and comments to ^^^^^THAT!!!????</p>
<p>MIND BOGGLING!!  Completely and utterly MIND-BOGGLING!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144469</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144469</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The so-called whistleblower &quot;scandal&quot; that the media is hyping up every which way has Democrats once again falling all over each other to declare another &quot;impeachable offense,&quot; despite having virtually no details about the conversation between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. But, like everything else that&#039;s been thrown at Trump, this appears to be another phony scandal. The Daily Wire&#039;s Ashe Schow reported Saturday that the whistleblower complaint &quot;is nothing more than a rumor reported by someone in the intelligence community.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Once again.. NOT FACTS...

Anonymous sources say that they heard someone who said they heard someone who said they heard President Trump on the phone...

And you people BUY INTO THAT!!!????

How desperate ARE you people???

How deep does your hate of America and President Trump REALLY go???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The so-called whistleblower "scandal" that the media is hyping up every which way has Democrats once again falling all over each other to declare another "impeachable offense," despite having virtually no details about the conversation between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. But, like everything else that's been thrown at Trump, this appears to be another phony scandal. The Daily Wire's Ashe Schow reported Saturday that the whistleblower complaint "is nothing more than a rumor reported by someone in the intelligence community."</b></p>
<p>Once again.. NOT FACTS...</p>
<p>Anonymous sources say that they heard someone who said they heard someone who said they heard President Trump on the phone...</p>
<p>And you people BUY INTO THAT!!!????</p>
<p>How desperate ARE you people???</p>
<p>How deep does your hate of America and President Trump REALLY go???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144468</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144468</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The Anti-Trump Whistleblower Story Looks Like Another Phony Scandal&lt;/B&gt;
https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-anti-trump-whistleblower-story-looks-like-another-phony-scandal/

Yep...

Democrats have ANOTHER new shiny that will turn out to be nothing but a lame well-stacked NOTHING burger..   

Works for me.. :D

Not only will it keep Democrats occupied and carry them to NEW heights before it dashes them to the ground and demolishes all their hopes and dreams.. AGAIN  :D

But this new shiny has a very real potential to boomerang back on the Democrats and totally decimate their front runner&#039;s Primary campaign..

The only down side to this is Joe Biden, having buried one son lost to cancer will have to witness his other son going to prison..

That is truly sad..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The Anti-Trump Whistleblower Story Looks Like Another Phony Scandal</b><br />
<a href="https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-anti-trump-whistleblower-story-looks-like-another-phony-scandal/" rel="nofollow">https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-anti-trump-whistleblower-story-looks-like-another-phony-scandal/</a></p>
<p>Yep...</p>
<p>Democrats have ANOTHER new shiny that will turn out to be nothing but a lame well-stacked NOTHING burger..   </p>
<p>Works for me.. :D</p>
<p>Not only will it keep Democrats occupied and carry them to NEW heights before it dashes them to the ground and demolishes all their hopes and dreams.. AGAIN  :D</p>
<p>But this new shiny has a very real potential to boomerang back on the Democrats and totally decimate their front runner's Primary campaign..</p>
<p>The only down side to this is Joe Biden, having buried one son lost to cancer will have to witness his other son going to prison..</p>
<p>That is truly sad..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144467</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144467</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;TIM ALLEN - ON TRUMP ...&lt;/b&gt;

The “Tool Man” on the MAN FOOL...

&lt;b&gt;Women are upset at Trump’s naughty words -- they also bought 80 million copies of 50 Shades of Gray. &lt;/b&gt;

What a ridiculous comparison.  Trump is a self-proclaimed practitioner of sexual assault, but women should be OK with that if they enjoy reading sexually erotic material...is that it?  

&lt;b&gt;Not one feminist has defended Sarah Sanders. It seems women’s rights only matter if those women are liberal.&lt;/b&gt;

Defended Sarah Sanders from what?   Which women’s right has Sarah been denied?    If Sarah wants to live out the rest of his life as a man, I support his decision.

&lt;b&gt;No Border Walls. No voter ID laws. Did you figure it out yet? &lt;/b&gt;

Yeah, Tim’s back on the Peruvian marching powder!  Who am I kidding?  He was never off of it!

&lt;b&gt;60 years ago, Venezuela was 4th on the world economic freedom index. Today, they are 179th and their citizens are dying of starvation. In only 10 years, Venezuela was destroyed by democratic socialism.&lt;/b&gt;

Wait... so nothing happened in Venezuela over the 50 years that you so expertly dismissed?  Funny that they weren’t 4th on the world economic freedom index 10 years ago, because then your claim might make sense.

&lt;b&gt;Russia donated $0.00 to the Trump campaign. Russia donated $145,600,000 to the Clinton Foundation. But Trump was the one investigated!&lt;/b&gt;

Trump was investigated for various crimes.  Russia donating to a non-profit isn’t a crime.   Not that difficult to understand.  

I keep forgetting that conservatives are used to the Trump Foundation’s methods.  The Clinton Foundation is an actual non-profit organization that does not benefit the Clinton’s personally in any way (I know that this is a foreign concept for anyone familiar to the Trump Foundation’s methods).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>TIM ALLEN - ON TRUMP ...</b></p>
<p>The “Tool Man” on the MAN FOOL...</p>
<p><b>Women are upset at Trump’s naughty words -- they also bought 80 million copies of 50 Shades of Gray. </b></p>
<p>What a ridiculous comparison.  Trump is a self-proclaimed practitioner of sexual assault, but women should be OK with that if they enjoy reading sexually erotic material...is that it?  </p>
<p><b>Not one feminist has defended Sarah Sanders. It seems women’s rights only matter if those women are liberal.</b></p>
<p>Defended Sarah Sanders from what?   Which women’s right has Sarah been denied?    If Sarah wants to live out the rest of his life as a man, I support his decision.</p>
<p><b>No Border Walls. No voter ID laws. Did you figure it out yet? </b></p>
<p>Yeah, Tim’s back on the Peruvian marching powder!  Who am I kidding?  He was never off of it!</p>
<p><b>60 years ago, Venezuela was 4th on the world economic freedom index. Today, they are 179th and their citizens are dying of starvation. In only 10 years, Venezuela was destroyed by democratic socialism.</b></p>
<p>Wait... so nothing happened in Venezuela over the 50 years that you so expertly dismissed?  Funny that they weren’t 4th on the world economic freedom index 10 years ago, because then your claim might make sense.</p>
<p><b>Russia donated $0.00 to the Trump campaign. Russia donated $145,600,000 to the Clinton Foundation. But Trump was the one investigated!</b></p>
<p>Trump was investigated for various crimes.  Russia donating to a non-profit isn’t a crime.   Not that difficult to understand.  </p>
<p>I keep forgetting that conservatives are used to the Trump Foundation’s methods.  The Clinton Foundation is an actual non-profit organization that does not benefit the Clinton’s personally in any way (I know that this is a foreign concept for anyone familiar to the Trump Foundation’s methods).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144466</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144466</guid>
		<description>JL,

&lt;I&gt;@m,

did you READ that salon article?&lt;/I&gt;

Tell ya what..  

I&#039;ll comment on your quoted portion after ya comment on mine...

Fair??   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JL,</p>
<p><i>@m,</p>
<p>did you READ that salon article?</i></p>
<p>Tell ya what..  </p>
<p>I'll comment on your quoted portion after ya comment on mine...</p>
<p>Fair??   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144465</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144465</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;One restriction that would serve a noncosmetic purpose is a limit on the size of magazines, to force mass shooters to reload. Even that rule would probably be ineffectual, because switching out magazines is a quick process, not one that gives potential victims much time to subdue their assailant. That said, the imposition on gun owners — a group that includes me — would be trivial.

Small victories may be uninspiring, but not as much as defeat. O’Rourke’s provocative position makes sense as part of the melodramatic journey of personal discovery he seems to be on. But for those who would like to pass any gun regulations, it amounts to friendly fire.&lt;/B&gt;

And Independents and NPAs and patriotic Americans will remember in 2020 the source of that friendly fire.....

AND vote accordingly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>One restriction that would serve a noncosmetic purpose is a limit on the size of magazines, to force mass shooters to reload. Even that rule would probably be ineffectual, because switching out magazines is a quick process, not one that gives potential victims much time to subdue their assailant. That said, the imposition on gun owners — a group that includes me — would be trivial.</p>
<p>Small victories may be uninspiring, but not as much as defeat. O’Rourke’s provocative position makes sense as part of the melodramatic journey of personal discovery he seems to be on. But for those who would like to pass any gun regulations, it amounts to friendly fire.</b></p>
<p>And Independents and NPAs and patriotic Americans will remember in 2020 the source of that friendly fire.....</p>
<p>AND vote accordingly...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144464</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144464</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Yet O’Rourke wants to leapfrog these options and focus on taking away guns that have long been legal. His demand is only likely to convince a lot of people that any gun control measure, no matter how modest, would be confiscation on the installment plan.

And where is the need for confiscation, anyway? It would affect only gun owners who have shown zero propensity to commit crimes, much less mass shootings, with their AR-15s. A ban on the manufacture, import or sale of these firearms, however, would prevent any person who doesn’t already have an AR-15 from legally acquiring one. So aspiring mass shooters would find it much harder to get them.

Not that I would favor such a measure, because gun-makers will find ways to modify their products to comply with the letter of the law — as they did after 1994. The legal market would continue to offer an array of firearms functionally identical to the banned ones.&lt;/B&gt;

Yep... Yep... Yep...

The ONLY thing this gun confiscation push by the 2020 Dem candidates has done is solidified in the minds of undecided Americans that Democrats DO, indeed, want to take law abiding Americans&#039; firearms...

And history will repeat itself and Democrats will be decimated in Nov of 2020....

&lt;B&gt;&quot;These are the facts of the case.  And they are undisputed.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Captain Smilin&#039; Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Yet O’Rourke wants to leapfrog these options and focus on taking away guns that have long been legal. His demand is only likely to convince a lot of people that any gun control measure, no matter how modest, would be confiscation on the installment plan.</p>
<p>And where is the need for confiscation, anyway? It would affect only gun owners who have shown zero propensity to commit crimes, much less mass shootings, with their AR-15s. A ban on the manufacture, import or sale of these firearms, however, would prevent any person who doesn’t already have an AR-15 from legally acquiring one. So aspiring mass shooters would find it much harder to get them.</p>
<p>Not that I would favor such a measure, because gun-makers will find ways to modify their products to comply with the letter of the law — as they did after 1994. The legal market would continue to offer an array of firearms functionally identical to the banned ones.</b></p>
<p>Yep... Yep... Yep...</p>
<p>The ONLY thing this gun confiscation push by the 2020 Dem candidates has done is solidified in the minds of undecided Americans that Democrats DO, indeed, want to take law abiding Americans' firearms...</p>
<p>And history will repeat itself and Democrats will be decimated in Nov of 2020....</p>
<p><b>"These are the facts of the case.  And they are undisputed."</b><br />
-Captain Smilin' Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144463</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144463</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;If there is anything gun control advocates have learned in the past 25 years, it’s that incremental change is extremely hard and anything more is impossible. In 1994, a federal assault weapons ban became law, but no significant federal gun control bill has passed since then. Supporters of the ban couldn’t even get it renewed when it expired in 2004.

After the Sandy Hook massacre in 2012, Obama proposed a modest change: requiring a background check for all gun sales. Though his party controlled the Senate, he was unable to muster the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster, and the bill died.

Come 2021, a Democratic president would do well to get that obvious reform enacted. A more ambitious step, such as a ban on new assault weapons, is probably beyond reach.&lt;/B&gt;

As I have said before, and NO ONE has been able to refute...

If the political climate wouldn&#039;t allow significant anti-gun legislation after Sandy Hook, nothing will...

Ya&#039;all will NEVER get your gun ban..  Ya&#039;all MAY get your 100% background checks (sans family members). It&#039;s nothing but a throwaway WOULDN&#039;T IT BE NICE LAW, but ya&#039;all are going to have to compromise to get it.

A national CCW Reciprocity or a moratorium on future gun laws or something...

But a ban on rifles, shotguns or handguns??

It will never happen in our lifetime..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>If there is anything gun control advocates have learned in the past 25 years, it’s that incremental change is extremely hard and anything more is impossible. In 1994, a federal assault weapons ban became law, but no significant federal gun control bill has passed since then. Supporters of the ban couldn’t even get it renewed when it expired in 2004.</p>
<p>After the Sandy Hook massacre in 2012, Obama proposed a modest change: requiring a background check for all gun sales. Though his party controlled the Senate, he was unable to muster the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster, and the bill died.</p>
<p>Come 2021, a Democratic president would do well to get that obvious reform enacted. A more ambitious step, such as a ban on new assault weapons, is probably beyond reach.</b></p>
<p>As I have said before, and NO ONE has been able to refute...</p>
<p>If the political climate wouldn't allow significant anti-gun legislation after Sandy Hook, nothing will...</p>
<p>Ya'all will NEVER get your gun ban..  Ya'all MAY get your 100% background checks (sans family members). It's nothing but a throwaway WOULDN'T IT BE NICE LAW, but ya'all are going to have to compromise to get it.</p>
<p>A national CCW Reciprocity or a moratorium on future gun laws or something...</p>
<p>But a ban on rifles, shotguns or handguns??</p>
<p>It will never happen in our lifetime..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144462</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144462</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Joe Biden hasn’t helped. Asked in August about the suspicion that, if elected, he would take away guns, he blurted: “Bingo! You’re right, if you have an assault weapon.&quot; Realizing his gaffe, Biden backtracked, saying he didn’t favor confiscation. But the National Rifle Association will ensure that the first remark will live forever.

For Democrats to say they want to seize a class of common firearms is the equivalent of a homeowner who, failing to get her asking price, decides to triple it. Or maybe it’s the equivalent of losing a U.S. Senate race and then deciding you should run for president.&lt;/B&gt;

You people simply are not able to understand the 2nd Amendment and how it is an impediment to ya&#039;all&#039;s gun confiscation plan..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;But!  But!!  But!!!  The 1994 Assault Rifle Ban!!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt; ya&#039;all would say..

Go ahead.. Say it..  I&#039;ll wait..

........

Got that out of your system??  

The {sic} assault rifle ban was so flawed and impotent, it wasn&#039;t WORTH it to take it to the SCOTUS to nullify it..

All rifles covered under the ban were grandfathered in..  If ya already had those rifles, they were perfectly legal to own and use..

For new manufacturer or import??  There were RIDICULOUS &quot;rules&quot; to the ban..  

For example, the ban stated that a rifle could not have the bayonet mount underneath the flash suppressor of the rifle..

So, manufacturers simply manufactured the EXACT same rifle without the bayonet mount..

THEN the rifle was **PERFECTLY LEGAL**!!!

The 1994 rifle ban was a joke and, as a joke, it wasn&#039;t worth the trouble to have it overturned and ruled unconstitutional...

This is the ONE overriding fact and ya&#039;all better get used to it..

There is not a gun ban law possible that will pass Constitutional muster...

ESPECIALLY in today&#039;s political climate..

It WON&#039;T happen..  

Get used to that fact..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Joe Biden hasn’t helped. Asked in August about the suspicion that, if elected, he would take away guns, he blurted: “Bingo! You’re right, if you have an assault weapon." Realizing his gaffe, Biden backtracked, saying he didn’t favor confiscation. But the National Rifle Association will ensure that the first remark will live forever.</p>
<p>For Democrats to say they want to seize a class of common firearms is the equivalent of a homeowner who, failing to get her asking price, decides to triple it. Or maybe it’s the equivalent of losing a U.S. Senate race and then deciding you should run for president.</b></p>
<p>You people simply are not able to understand the 2nd Amendment and how it is an impediment to ya'all's gun confiscation plan..</p>
<p><b>"But!  But!!  But!!!  The 1994 Assault Rifle Ban!!!!"</b> ya'all would say..</p>
<p>Go ahead.. Say it..  I'll wait..</p>
<p>........</p>
<p>Got that out of your system??  </p>
<p>The {sic} assault rifle ban was so flawed and impotent, it wasn't WORTH it to take it to the SCOTUS to nullify it..</p>
<p>All rifles covered under the ban were grandfathered in..  If ya already had those rifles, they were perfectly legal to own and use..</p>
<p>For new manufacturer or import??  There were RIDICULOUS "rules" to the ban..  </p>
<p>For example, the ban stated that a rifle could not have the bayonet mount underneath the flash suppressor of the rifle..</p>
<p>So, manufacturers simply manufactured the EXACT same rifle without the bayonet mount..</p>
<p>THEN the rifle was **PERFECTLY LEGAL**!!!</p>
<p>The 1994 rifle ban was a joke and, as a joke, it wasn't worth the trouble to have it overturned and ruled unconstitutional...</p>
<p>This is the ONE overriding fact and ya'all better get used to it..</p>
<p>There is not a gun ban law possible that will pass Constitutional muster...</p>
<p>ESPECIALLY in today's political climate..</p>
<p>It WON'T happen..  </p>
<p>Get used to that fact..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144461</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144461</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Column: Beto O’Rourke’s boneheaded call for confiscating guns

In an IQ contest with Beto O’Rourke, I would guess, Donald Trump would finish a distant second. But in tweeting Wednesday that, when it comes to gun legislation, “Dummy Beto made it much harder to make a deal,” Trump actually had a point.

The president was referring to O’Rourke’s comments on AR-15 rifles during the Sept. 12 Democratic presidential debate. The general Democratic Party consensus is to forbid the sale, manufacture and import of “assault weapons,” with the federal government offering to buy back those already in existence. But O’Rourke is not willing to stop there. He wants to require all current owners to hand them over.

Asked, “Are you proposing taking away their guns?” he was moved to make the stirring proclamation: “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We’re not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore.”

It was a thunderous vindication of the paranoia that afflicts a segment of the gun-owning population. Barack Obama ran in 2008 promising not to take away anyone’s firearms, and he was true to his word. Gun fanatics accused him and his party of plotting to do just that, though, and O’Rourke has given them the — what’s the term? — smoking gun.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.chicagotribune.com/columns/steve-chapman/ct-column-beto-orourke-guns-assault-weapons-confiscate-chapman-20190920-zaatvkyfp5gq5ljfpslltjd6wy-story.html

I just don&#039;t understand how Democrats could be so completely and utterly STOOPID in their gun confiscation craze...

In the aftermath of the 1994 {sic} &quot;Assault Rifle&quot; ban, Democrats were DECIMATED and totally thrown out of office en masse...

Again, it&#039;s as if Democrats WANT to be blown away in the 2020 Election...  

Mind-boggling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Column: Beto O’Rourke’s boneheaded call for confiscating guns</p>
<p>In an IQ contest with Beto O’Rourke, I would guess, Donald Trump would finish a distant second. But in tweeting Wednesday that, when it comes to gun legislation, “Dummy Beto made it much harder to make a deal,” Trump actually had a point.</p>
<p>The president was referring to O’Rourke’s comments on AR-15 rifles during the Sept. 12 Democratic presidential debate. The general Democratic Party consensus is to forbid the sale, manufacture and import of “assault weapons,” with the federal government offering to buy back those already in existence. But O’Rourke is not willing to stop there. He wants to require all current owners to hand them over.</p>
<p>Asked, “Are you proposing taking away their guns?” he was moved to make the stirring proclamation: “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We’re not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore.”</p>
<p>It was a thunderous vindication of the paranoia that afflicts a segment of the gun-owning population. Barack Obama ran in 2008 promising not to take away anyone’s firearms, and he was true to his word. Gun fanatics accused him and his party of plotting to do just that, though, and O’Rourke has given them the — what’s the term? — smoking gun.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/columns/steve-chapman/ct-column-beto-orourke-guns-assault-weapons-confiscate-chapman-20190920-zaatvkyfp5gq5ljfpslltjd6wy-story.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.chicagotribune.com/columns/steve-chapman/ct-column-beto-orourke-guns-assault-weapons-confiscate-chapman-20190920-zaatvkyfp5gq5ljfpslltjd6wy-story.html</a></p>
<p>I just don't understand how Democrats could be so completely and utterly STOOPID in their gun confiscation craze...</p>
<p>In the aftermath of the 1994 {sic} "Assault Rifle" ban, Democrats were DECIMATED and totally thrown out of office en masse...</p>
<p>Again, it's as if Democrats WANT to be blown away in the 2020 Election...  </p>
<p>Mind-boggling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144460</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144460</guid>
		<description>Oops.. Forgot to attribute the above..

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bidens-campaign-coming-to-an-end-thanks-to-ukraine-story-linked-to-hillary-clinton-nunes-says</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.. Forgot to attribute the above..</p>
<p><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bidens-campaign-coming-to-an-end-thanks-to-ukraine-story-linked-to-hillary-clinton-nunes-says" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bidens-campaign-coming-to-an-end-thanks-to-ukraine-story-linked-to-hillary-clinton-nunes-says</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144459</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144459</guid>
		<description>And in the YOU CAN&#039;T MAKE THIS STUFF UP department..

&lt;B&gt;Biden&#039;s campaign likely coming to an end -- thanks to Clinton-linked Ukraine bombshell, Nunes says

California Rep. Devin Nunes predicted on Fox News&#039; &quot;Sunday Morning Futures&quot; that Joe Biden&#039;s campaign is likely coming to an end -- all because of newly resurfaced reports about his possible misconduct in Ukraine that &quot;first originated back when Hillary Clinton was trying to make sure Biden didn’t get in the race.&quot;

The top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee made the claim as The Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom poll showed Sen. Elizabeth Warren surging ahead of Biden as the first choice of 22 percent of the voters surveyed, while Biden was the first choice of 20 percent of the voters. Biden held a 9-point lead over Warren in the poll as recently as June.&lt;/B&gt;

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

We have history repeating itself..

Just as it was Hillary who brought to the forefront the Obama Birther nonsense..

It was ALSO Hillary who brought up the Joe Biden/China/Ukraine debacle..  :D

So, when the Biden campaign is decimated and mortally wounded, ya&#039;all can thank Hillary.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in the YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP department..</p>
<p><b>Biden's campaign likely coming to an end -- thanks to Clinton-linked Ukraine bombshell, Nunes says</p>
<p>California Rep. Devin Nunes predicted on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures" that Joe Biden's campaign is likely coming to an end -- all because of newly resurfaced reports about his possible misconduct in Ukraine that "first originated back when Hillary Clinton was trying to make sure Biden didn’t get in the race."</p>
<p>The top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee made the claim as The Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom poll showed Sen. Elizabeth Warren surging ahead of Biden as the first choice of 22 percent of the voters surveyed, while Biden was the first choice of 20 percent of the voters. Biden held a 9-point lead over Warren in the poll as recently as June.</b></p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>We have history repeating itself..</p>
<p>Just as it was Hillary who brought to the forefront the Obama Birther nonsense..</p>
<p>It was ALSO Hillary who brought up the Joe Biden/China/Ukraine debacle..  :D</p>
<p>So, when the Biden campaign is decimated and mortally wounded, ya'all can thank Hillary.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144458</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144458</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;If Dem party doesn’t call for investigation of Bidens’ millions from Ukraine and billions from China, they will own it. Bidens’ made big money selling public office. How could Obama have allowed this to happen? Will Dems continue to condone and enable this kind pay-for-play?&lt;/B&gt;
-Rudy Guilani

Yep...  Democrats may singe President Trump a bit..

But they are going to burn their own house to the ground..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>If Dem party doesn’t call for investigation of Bidens’ millions from Ukraine and billions from China, they will own it. Bidens’ made big money selling public office. How could Obama have allowed this to happen? Will Dems continue to condone and enable this kind pay-for-play?</b><br />
-Rudy Guilani</p>
<p>Yep...  Democrats may singe President Trump a bit..</p>
<p>But they are going to burn their own house to the ground..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144457</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144457</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;END OF WATCH

Deputy Sheriff Chris Hulsey
Meade County Sheriff&#039;s Office, Kentucky
End of Watch: Saturday, September 21, 2019

&lt;I&gt;And remind the few...
When ill of us they speak...
That we are all that stands between...
The monsters and the weak.....&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13839e8d10b9303c8d9aee50576e15b15f4844be91d15073a21097a85b780c50.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>END OF WATCH</p>
<p>Deputy Sheriff Chris Hulsey<br />
Meade County Sheriff's Office, Kentucky<br />
End of Watch: Saturday, September 21, 2019</p>
<p><i>And remind the few...<br />
When ill of us they speak...<br />
That we are all that stands between...<br />
The monsters and the weak.....</i></b></p>
<p><a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13839e8d10b9303c8d9aee50576e15b15f4844be91d15073a21097a85b780c50.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13839e8d10b9303c8d9aee50576e15b15f4844be91d15073a21097a85b780c50.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144456</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144456</guid>
		<description>Another GLORIOUS Monday in the land of Weigantia.. :D

I wasn&#039;t able to post so much yesterday, being a workday and all.. But today...???

Today, ya&#039;all have my undivided attention!!

Won&#039;t it be grand!!??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another GLORIOUS Monday in the land of Weigantia.. :D</p>
<p>I wasn't able to post so much yesterday, being a workday and all.. But today...???</p>
<p>Today, ya'all have my undivided attention!!</p>
<p>Won't it be grand!!??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144455</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144455</guid>
		<description>So, I guess I scared Patrick away so much, he ain&#039;t NEVER coming back!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I guess I scared Patrick away so much, he ain't NEVER coming back!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144454</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144454</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The push by Trump and his personal attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, to influence the newly elected Ukrainian leader reveals a president convinced of his own invincibility — apparently willing and even eager to wield the vast powers of the United States to taint a political foe and confident that no one could hold him back.&lt;/B&gt;

WOW...

That sounds EXACTLY like OBAMA...

Uncanny!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The push by Trump and his personal attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, to influence the newly elected Ukrainian leader reveals a president convinced of his own invincibility — apparently willing and even eager to wield the vast powers of the United States to taint a political foe and confident that no one could hold him back.</b></p>
<p>WOW...</p>
<p>That sounds EXACTLY like OBAMA...</p>
<p>Uncanny!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144453</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144453</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;admittedly it&#039;s a tough argument to refute. as i see it, the only way to effectively refute it is to put joe &quot;norms and standards of a bygone era&quot; biden in the white house.&lt;/I&gt;

The bygone OBAMA era..

And we know how bad the country tanked during THAT era..

Who in their right mind would want to that mess??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>admittedly it's a tough argument to refute. as i see it, the only way to effectively refute it is to put joe "norms and standards of a bygone era" biden in the white house.</i></p>
<p>The bygone OBAMA era..</p>
<p>And we know how bad the country tanked during THAT era..</p>
<p>Who in their right mind would want to that mess??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144452</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144452</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Strange how conservatives fail to mention these little facts in their reporting of the story!&lt;/I&gt;

The FACT is, conversations between President Trump and another world leader is the EPITOME of Executive Privilege and is not subject to whistleblower statutes..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Strange how conservatives fail to mention these little facts in their reporting of the story!</i></p>
<p>The FACT is, conversations between President Trump and another world leader is the EPITOME of Executive Privilege and is not subject to whistleblower statutes..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144451</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144451</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Capt. Whorely&lt;/i&gt;

Evidently, Russ is still on the 3rd grade playground..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Capt. Whorely</i></p>
<p>Evidently, Russ is still on the 3rd grade playground..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144449</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 03:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144449</guid>
		<description>That&#039;ll do it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That'll do it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144448</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 02:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144448</guid>
		<description>admittedly it&#039;s a tough argument to refute. as i see it, the only way to effectively refute it is to put joe &quot;norms and standards of a bygone era&quot; biden in the white house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>admittedly it's a tough argument to refute. as i see it, the only way to effectively refute it is to put joe "norms and standards of a bygone era" biden in the white house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144447</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 02:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144447</guid>
		<description>@m,

did you READ that salon article?

&lt;b&gt;the relationship between our two major parties has become asymmetrical: Democrats cling to norms and standards of a bygone era, Biden-style, and also, by their nature, are driven by principles of dialogue, reasoned discourse and compromise. LOL! Republicans are totally over that shit, and have gone full-on ruthless culture war, a dynamic explored by Salon&#039;s Amanda Marcotte in her book &quot;Troll Nation&quot;: They know they can’t win a fair fight on issues and policies, but when it comes to semiotic battles rooted in racism, nationalism and cultural division, they consistently hold the upper hand.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@m,</p>
<p>did you READ that salon article?</p>
<p><b>the relationship between our two major parties has become asymmetrical: Democrats cling to norms and standards of a bygone era, Biden-style, and also, by their nature, are driven by principles of dialogue, reasoned discourse and compromise. LOL! Republicans are totally over that shit, and have gone full-on ruthless culture war, a dynamic explored by Salon's Amanda Marcotte in her book "Troll Nation": They know they can’t win a fair fight on issues and policies, but when it comes to semiotic battles rooted in racism, nationalism and cultural division, they consistently hold the upper hand.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144446</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 01:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144446</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As of now, acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire is still refusing to forward the whistleblower’s complaint to the congressional intelligence committees, &lt;b&gt;even though the inspector general deemed it an “urgent concern” and “credible,” triggering a statutory requirement that he do so.&lt;/b&gt;

The Justice Department has advised Maguire not to follow this directive, asserting that the matter falls outside the parameters of the statute, because the subject of the complaint supposedly doesn’t concern activity within the DNI’s purview.

&lt;b&gt;But the inspector general, Michael Atkinson, has now sharply disputed this, claiming that the complaint “relates to one of the most significant and important of the DNI’s responsibilities to the American people.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Strange how conservatives fail to mention these little facts in their reporting of the story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As of now, acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire is still refusing to forward the whistleblower’s complaint to the congressional intelligence committees, <b>even though the inspector general deemed it an “urgent concern” and “credible,” triggering a statutory requirement that he do so.</b></p>
<p>The Justice Department has advised Maguire not to follow this directive, asserting that the matter falls outside the parameters of the statute, because the subject of the complaint supposedly doesn’t concern activity within the DNI’s purview.</p>
<p><b>But the inspector general, Michael Atkinson, has now sharply disputed this, claiming that the complaint “relates to one of the most significant and important of the DNI’s responsibilities to the American people."</b></i></p>
<p>Strange how conservatives fail to mention these little facts in their reporting of the story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144445</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 01:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144445</guid>
		<description>Capt. Whorely

Wow!   I have to say that I have never seen you so desperate to avoid discussing your claimed FACTS in all my years on this board!   

Your rush to post as many distractions as you could to bury your cowardly response to my request that you clarify whether you have ever actually served as a commissioned law enforcement officer at any point in your life — as you claim — is so obvious that &lt;b&gt;&lt;I&gt; pathetic &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; does not even begin to do your cowardliness justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capt. Whorely</p>
<p>Wow!   I have to say that I have never seen you so desperate to avoid discussing your claimed FACTS in all my years on this board!   </p>
<p>Your rush to post as many distractions as you could to bury your cowardly response to my request that you clarify whether you have ever actually served as a commissioned law enforcement officer at any point in your life — as you claim — is so obvious that <b><i> pathetic </i></b> does not even begin to do your cowardliness justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144443</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144443</guid>
		<description>Where HAS Neil gone... The Hysterical Trump haters are missing one of their best singers.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where HAS Neil gone... The Hysterical Trump haters are missing one of their best singers.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144442</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144442</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;If you need to 30 rounds to hunt, you suck at hunting&lt;/B&gt;
-Conventional Democrat &quot;wisdom&quot;

&lt;B&gt;&quot;If you need a disarmed society to govern, you suck at governing&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Reality Truism

:D

More facts...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Sauce for the goose&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Captain Spock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>If you need to 30 rounds to hunt, you suck at hunting</b><br />
-Conventional Democrat "wisdom"</p>
<p><b>"If you need a disarmed society to govern, you suck at governing"</b><br />
-Reality Truism</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>More facts...</p>
<p><b>"Sauce for the goose"</b><br />
-Captain Spock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144441</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144441</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Your &quot;facts&quot; routine has run its course. I&#039;m bored by it.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, I know it&#039;s so boring...

But hay... Liven things up and try to REFUTE the facts.. :D

Bonus points for using facts to refute my facts.. :D

This could keep us entertained for HOURS!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Your "facts" routine has run its course. I'm bored by it.</i></p>
<p>Yea, I know it's so boring...</p>
<p>But hay... Liven things up and try to REFUTE the facts.. :D</p>
<p>Bonus points for using facts to refute my facts.. :D</p>
<p>This could keep us entertained for HOURS!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144439</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144439</guid>
		<description>Your &quot;facts&quot; routine has run its course. I&#039;m bored by it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your "facts" routine has run its course. I'm bored by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144438</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144438</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;TIM ALLEN - ON TRUMP ...

Here are some interesting points to think about prior to 2020, especially to my friends on the fence, like moderate Democrats, Libertarians and Independents and the never Trump Republicans and those thinking of &quot;walking away&quot; from the Democratic party.

Women are upset at Trump’s naughty words -- they also bought 80 million copies of 50 Shades of Gray.

Not one feminist has defended Sarah Sanders. It seems women’s rights only matter if those women are liberal.

No Border Walls. No voter ID laws. Did you figure it out yet? But wait... there&#039;s more.

President Trump’s wall costs less than the Obamacare website. Let that sink in, America.

We are one election away from open borders, socialism, gun confiscation, and full-term abortion nationally. We are fighting evil.

They sent more troops and armament to arrest Roger Stone than they sent to defend Benghazi.

60 years ago, Venezuela was 4th on the world economic freedom index. Today, they are 179th and their citizens are dying of starvation. In only 10 years, Venezuela was destroyed by democratic socialism.

Russia donated $0.00 to the Trump campaign. Russia donated $145,600,000 to the Clinton Foundation. But Trump was the one investigated!

Nancy Pelosi invited illegal aliens to the State of the Union. President Trump Invited victims of illegal aliens to the State of the Union. Let that sink in.

A socialist is basically a communist who doesn’t have the power to take everything from their citizens at gunpoint ... Yet!

How do you walk 3000 miles across Mexico without food or support and show up at our border 100 pounds overweight and with a cellphone?

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez wants to ban cars, ban planes, give out universal income and thinks socialism works. She calls Donald Trump crazy.

Bill Clinton paid $850,000 to Paula Jones to get her to go away. I don’t remember the FBI raiding his lawyer’s office.

I wake up every day and I am grateful that Hillary Clinton is not the president of the United States of America.

The same media that told me Hillary Clinton had a 95% chance of winning now tells me Trump’s approval ratings are low.

“The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”— Margaret Thatcher

Maxine Waters opposes voter ID laws; She thinks that they are racist. You need to have a photo ID to attend her town hall meetings.

President Trump said — &quot;They’re not after me. They’re after you. I’m just in their way.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

SOME Hollywood celebrities actually have more than 2 brain cells to rub together...

Funny how those ones are ALL Trump voters.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>TIM ALLEN - ON TRUMP ...</p>
<p>Here are some interesting points to think about prior to 2020, especially to my friends on the fence, like moderate Democrats, Libertarians and Independents and the never Trump Republicans and those thinking of "walking away" from the Democratic party.</p>
<p>Women are upset at Trump’s naughty words -- they also bought 80 million copies of 50 Shades of Gray.</p>
<p>Not one feminist has defended Sarah Sanders. It seems women’s rights only matter if those women are liberal.</p>
<p>No Border Walls. No voter ID laws. Did you figure it out yet? But wait... there's more.</p>
<p>President Trump’s wall costs less than the Obamacare website. Let that sink in, America.</p>
<p>We are one election away from open borders, socialism, gun confiscation, and full-term abortion nationally. We are fighting evil.</p>
<p>They sent more troops and armament to arrest Roger Stone than they sent to defend Benghazi.</p>
<p>60 years ago, Venezuela was 4th on the world economic freedom index. Today, they are 179th and their citizens are dying of starvation. In only 10 years, Venezuela was destroyed by democratic socialism.</p>
<p>Russia donated $0.00 to the Trump campaign. Russia donated $145,600,000 to the Clinton Foundation. But Trump was the one investigated!</p>
<p>Nancy Pelosi invited illegal aliens to the State of the Union. President Trump Invited victims of illegal aliens to the State of the Union. Let that sink in.</p>
<p>A socialist is basically a communist who doesn’t have the power to take everything from their citizens at gunpoint ... Yet!</p>
<p>How do you walk 3000 miles across Mexico without food or support and show up at our border 100 pounds overweight and with a cellphone?</p>
<p>Alexandria Ocasio Cortez wants to ban cars, ban planes, give out universal income and thinks socialism works. She calls Donald Trump crazy.</p>
<p>Bill Clinton paid $850,000 to Paula Jones to get her to go away. I don’t remember the FBI raiding his lawyer’s office.</p>
<p>I wake up every day and I am grateful that Hillary Clinton is not the president of the United States of America.</p>
<p>The same media that told me Hillary Clinton had a 95% chance of winning now tells me Trump’s approval ratings are low.</p>
<p>“The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”— Margaret Thatcher</p>
<p>Maxine Waters opposes voter ID laws; She thinks that they are racist. You need to have a photo ID to attend her town hall meetings.</p>
<p>President Trump said — "They’re not after me. They’re after you. I’m just in their way."</b></p>
<p>SOME Hollywood celebrities actually have more than 2 brain cells to rub together...</p>
<p>Funny how those ones are ALL Trump voters.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144437</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144437</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;It&#039;s so hard to find a straight man who is confident enough to compliment me on my looks..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Caitlyn Jenner

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Nice balls.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-President Donald Trump

heheheheheeheheheheheheehehehehehehe

Now THAT was funny!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"It's so hard to find a straight man who is confident enough to compliment me on my looks.."</b><br />
-Caitlyn Jenner</p>
<p><b>"Nice balls."</b><br />
-President Donald Trump</p>
<p>heheheheheeheheheheheheehehehehehehe</p>
<p>Now THAT was funny!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144436</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144436</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Face to face with what looks an awful lot like the rise of American fascism, the Democratic Party has a historic opportunity — and a historic responsibility. It has repeatedly proven itself to be unequal to the task, to a comic and pathetic degree. 

Democratic congressional leaders, Democratic presidential candidates and the party’s true-blue believers keep wandering through familiar patterns, like someone in a dream state out of a Kafka story or a surrealist film, clinging to the fading hope that this time around the nonsensical narrative will reach a satisfactory resolution. If you tried to design a center-left political party trapped between the traditions of social democracy and classical liberalism, unclear about its core beliefs and equally terrified by both its most vicious opponents and its most ardent supporters — in other words, a party perfectly positioned to capitulate to tyranny with nothing more than a few disapproving whimpers — I hardly think you could do better than the one we’ve got.&lt;/B&gt;

WOW..  This SALON author NAILS the Democrat Party perfectly.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Face to face with what looks an awful lot like the rise of American fascism, the Democratic Party has a historic opportunity — and a historic responsibility. It has repeatedly proven itself to be unequal to the task, to a comic and pathetic degree. </p>
<p>Democratic congressional leaders, Democratic presidential candidates and the party’s true-blue believers keep wandering through familiar patterns, like someone in a dream state out of a Kafka story or a surrealist film, clinging to the fading hope that this time around the nonsensical narrative will reach a satisfactory resolution. If you tried to design a center-left political party trapped between the traditions of social democracy and classical liberalism, unclear about its core beliefs and equally terrified by both its most vicious opponents and its most ardent supporters — in other words, a party perfectly positioned to capitulate to tyranny with nothing more than a few disapproving whimpers — I hardly think you could do better than the one we’ve got.</b></p>
<p>WOW..  This SALON author NAILS the Democrat Party perfectly.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144435</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144435</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Doomed, delusional, divided and corrupt: How the Democratic Party became a haunted house

Conflicted about ideology and identity and deeply compromised by history, the Democratic Party is built to lose&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.salon.com/2019/09/22/doomed-delusional-divided-and-corrupt-how-the-democratic-party-became-a-haunted-house/

Well, how about that.. Someone at SALON gets it.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Doomed, delusional, divided and corrupt: How the Democratic Party became a haunted house</p>
<p>Conflicted about ideology and identity and deeply compromised by history, the Democratic Party is built to lose</b><br />
<a href="https://www.salon.com/2019/09/22/doomed-delusional-divided-and-corrupt-how-the-democratic-party-became-a-haunted-house/" rel="nofollow">https://www.salon.com/2019/09/22/doomed-delusional-divided-and-corrupt-how-the-democratic-party-became-a-haunted-house/</a></p>
<p>Well, how about that.. Someone at SALON gets it.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144434</guid>
		<description>But, it&#039;s OK..

I don&#039;t expect ya&#039;all to see the facts..  But they will come out nonetheless... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, it's OK..</p>
<p>I don't expect ya'all to see the facts..  But they will come out nonetheless... :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144433</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144433</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m not reading all the comments above but, I hope you&#039;re not saying that what Biden, the Obama administration, the EU, reformers in Ukraine, and the World Bank did is the same as what Trump is alleged to have done, are you?&lt;/I&gt;

I am not saying anything.. I merely relay the FACTS that the Obama Administration (of which Biden was part of) did the exact thing to Trump that President Trump is being accused of...

As far as Biden goes, there is plenty of evidence of impropriety with regards to VP Biden and Hunter Biden vis a vis China and Ukraine...

All of THAT will come out, should Democrats pursue this Ukraine thing...

If you DO take the time to read all the comments above (which, as I said, are FACTS) you will learn the facts and the reality..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'm not reading all the comments above but, I hope you're not saying that what Biden, the Obama administration, the EU, reformers in Ukraine, and the World Bank did is the same as what Trump is alleged to have done, are you?</i></p>
<p>I am not saying anything.. I merely relay the FACTS that the Obama Administration (of which Biden was part of) did the exact thing to Trump that President Trump is being accused of...</p>
<p>As far as Biden goes, there is plenty of evidence of impropriety with regards to VP Biden and Hunter Biden vis a vis China and Ukraine...</p>
<p>All of THAT will come out, should Democrats pursue this Ukraine thing...</p>
<p>If you DO take the time to read all the comments above (which, as I said, are FACTS) you will learn the facts and the reality..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144432</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144432</guid>
		<description>Michale,

I&#039;m not reading all the comments above but, I hope you&#039;re not saying that what Biden, the Obama administration, the EU, reformers in Ukraine, and the World Bank did is the same as what Trump is alleged to have done, are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>I'm not reading all the comments above but, I hope you're not saying that what Biden, the Obama administration, the EU, reformers in Ukraine, and the World Bank did is the same as what Trump is alleged to have done, are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/20/ftp543/#comment-144431</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17429#comment-144431</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Mike [90-91]: So, so far you have the name of a Ukranian company, and that Hunter Biden worked at that company. You have the name of a prosecutor, who stopped looking into that company. And from that, they want to create a scandal?&lt;/I&gt;

Obviously, you didn&#039;t even READ anything about what is going on..

Willful ignorance.. It&#039;s the Democrat way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Mike [90-91]: So, so far you have the name of a Ukranian company, and that Hunter Biden worked at that company. You have the name of a prosecutor, who stopped looking into that company. And from that, they want to create a scandal?</i></p>
<p>Obviously, you didn't even READ anything about what is going on..</p>
<p>Willful ignorance.. It's the Democrat way...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
