Well, you're right that not voting is not a good idea.

*bookmarked*

But since not voting is not part of One Demand and voting is part of One Demand, the only reason you would bring it up is to be an asshole because you can't make a rational argument against what One Demand really is.

It's never too late for you to get an education, Don, because it really does take a special kind of stupid to whine ad nauseam about not voting for big money candidates saying: "lose our votes" and then claim otherwise. Duh!

Your website clearly states that a person should register as a participant in One Demand and declare that "in the 2016 [not a typo] elections they will only vote for candidates that finance their campaigns only with contributions from individuals in the aggregate amount of 200 dollars or less."

You've also already conceded on multiple occasions that there isn't a candidate in America who meets those qualifications... not a single one who doesn't take "big money."

Clue in, moron. Is it really all that difficult to grasp the basic concept that a person who pledges to only vote for a candidate that doesn't exist in America is a person that is pledging not to vote!? One cannot vote for a candidate who doesn't exist, Don!

You really must enjoy looking stupid.

Said the guy with a website that's outdated by multiple years and a bio wherein he highlights front and center his lack of a degree, lack of success, lack of experience, and brags about his "average" existence. :)

In Balthy's defense, I knew what he meant.. I just was capitalizing on his bonehead mistake. Much as everyone here likes to do when I make a mistake.. :D

It's all in good fun.. :D

With all those 'bows' in her quiver, there wont be room for any arrows!

Of course you would say that..

And, of course, you are wrong..

But I do know that we're a long, long, long, long way from being done.

Yer right..

Trump will be POTUS til Jan of 2025 and I am sure ya'all Dumbocrats are going to be as hysterical and as wrong as ya'all have been the last 2+ years..

The point being that she has more ARROWS in her quiver than you give her credit for.

Now how she uses them depends on her wise decision making, and I sure don't know.

But I do know that we're a long, long, long, long way from being done.

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOITkxy18dY

Yea.. I encourage ya'all to try that...

Show what the Dumbocrats stand for...

The real challenge would be to alter the mission of the military. The house could decrease funding to a lot of hardware programs and transfer the money to cyber defense spending.

This would have the result of pointing a lot of resources at the support Trump is getting from Russian military hackers that he needs to win the 2020 election.

There WAS no "points being made"...

Just a drunken bullshit rant that Pelosi actually has any power against President Trump..

But, of course, you defend the bullshit..

PARTY UBER ALLES

You have no idea what I'm talking about.

No.. The FACTS clearly show that YOU have no idea what yer talking about..

As Russ pointed out...

What if Nancy decides that she's now gonna play hardball, and eliminates the Dept of Homeland Security from the budget? Or the military?

Yea??

I would LOVE to see Brain Dead Pelosi try and defund the US Military..

A Dumbocrat's life wouldn't be worth a plug nickel if she tried that..

I DOUBLE DOG dare her to try that..

Only a MORON would think that THAT is a good idea..

Michale was mocking you for saying Pelosi had “bows in her quiver.”

Arrows are stored in a quiver, not bows.

We all knew what you were trying to say, Michale just prefers to avoid having to actually address the points being made.

Let's say she puts them on life support. What can Trump do, other than negotiate?

You have no idea what I'm talking about.

Just a minute..I'm savoring.

Okay, what I'm talking about are all of the legislative things that the House can do. Do you remember the "power of the purse"? Trump actually can't spend a dime without the House approving it.

Do you grok what I am saying?

Yea, that's yer wishful thinking.. But you have been wrong about everything TRUMP so far..

Executive Privilege is a real thing.. You didn't mind it when Odumbo used it..

SCOTUS will side with Trump, just as they have on immigration and 2nd Amendment..

Also: Nancy has a lot more bows in her quiver than you imagine.

The fact that she has bows in her quiver PROVES she is a complete and utter moron...

The simple fact is, she's senile.. Anyone who carries bows in her quiver IS senile..

Barely holding on to reality.. She will likely die in office before the 2020 election...

"Ding Dong, the witch is dead.. The mean old witch.. The wicked witch.. Ding Dong the wicked witch is dead."

Firstly, Michale, you're full of shit. Sorry, but the folks on SCOTUS are there for life, so whatever they said to Trump to get the job is gone. That said, Kavanaugh is probably with him.

But the Rest will side with Congress. So there's that.

No Facts - F U this is opinion.

Also: Nancy has a lot more bows in her quiver than you imagine. If this lasts through the summer the negotiations on the budget get really interesting.

They can consider themselves warned.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/05/16/2020_the_year_of_the_women_--_for_trump_140342.html

Dumbocrats are in for a HUGE slap in the face in 2020... :D

In an application filed with the FISA court in October 2016, former FBI Director James Comey accused Carter Page, a Trump campaign aide, of being a Russian agent. (The initial warrant also was signed by former deputy attorney general and Trump foe Sally Yates.) The document is symbolic of how the Obama Justice Department was weaponized against the Trump campaign by corrupt partisans, many of whom—thankfully—now find themselves under investigation.
https://amgreatness.com/2019/05/15/the-fisa-footnote-that-could-doom-collusion-hoaxsters/

Dumbocrats are crapping their pants!! :D

It's obvious to anyone not enslaved by Party dogma...

In the exact same way you'll always be trailer trash and nothing can change that fact, I'll always be unaffiliated and sworn to uphold the law. :)

No "mind reading" necessary. Everything you say and do about Russiagate just screams, we're POOR LOSERS!!

You're missing the big picture, old man. No surprise there. :)

It's obvious to anyone not enslaved by Party dogma...

No "mind reading" necessary. Everything you say and do about Russiagate just screams, we're POOR LOSERS!!

Your argument is similar to the other utter asinine bullshit constantly promulgated by the board troll and is basically nothing more than "I can read your mind." It's complete bullshit, Stucki. When you're making up shit about other posters and claiming you know what they're thinking and making up fake quotes, you're proving nothing beyond the fact that you have no other argument.

The ring wingnuts who keep claiming that Democrats can't get over the election are the ones who keep bringing it up ad nauseam... proving over and over and without question that they've got little else to celebrate while everyone else has obviously moved on. :)

Of course you're 100% right on the Benghazi nonsense. OMYGAWD, did I just say that? Better feel my forehead, must be feverish!

I would have to disagree.. 4 Americans died at Benghazi...

That alone makes it NOT "nonsense"...

But at least you are consistent.. :D

You don't claim Benghazi was "nonsense" and then turn around and say "But going after Trump is perfectly acceptable!!"..

You must have a little Glenn Greenwald in you.. :D

Of course you're 100% right on the Benghazi nonsense. OMYGAWD, did I just say that? Better feel my forehead, must be feverish!

Pulling your head out of your ass even for a short amount of time will make it infinitely easier to feel your forehead. Okay, I'd say you're SNAFU. :)

Of course you're 100% right on the Benghazi nonsense. OMYGAWD, did I just say that? Better feel my forehead, must be feverish!

Not a single one of you LOSERS would give a pinch of shit about either of those episodes, if only you weren't LOSERS, right?

From a purely legal point of view, it's obstruction of justice to impede the constitutionally mandated oversight of the Executive Branch by the Legislative Branch whether a partisan from Podunk thinks it's for purely political reasons or not.

If you enjoyed the 8 political hearings into Benghazi that were designed to harass a potential presidential candidate and then continued unabated to harass the actual presidential candidate, then talk to the hand. :)

And playing out against this backdrop is the DOJ's special counsel investigation of Democrats' actions that began the whole Russia Collusion delusion debacle...

It's gonna be a fun time!! :D

Exactly.....

What it's really doing is harassing/punishing the president for winning an election that ALL the pollsters, ALL the pundits, ALL the crystal-ball gazers PROMISED the Democratics that he could NEVER win!

Exactly X2....

Which is exactly why the Democratics will lose in the SCOTUS..

It's ALL about taking down President Trump... A coup...

And the SCOTUS will not be a party to a coup against the freely, fairly and legally elected President Of The United States...

Gives a whole new meaning to the concept of POOR LOSERS, right?

"I know, right!?"
Felix, WRECK IT RALPH

What it's really doing is harassing/punishing the president for winning an election that ALL the pollsters, ALL the pundits, ALL the crystal-ball gazers PROMISED the Democratics that he could NEVER win!

The unstated but obvious point of that is that if it was impossible for Hillary to lose, then Trump MUST HAVE CHEATED!

Gives a whole new meaning to the concept of POOR LOSERS, right?

The three branches of government may be equal- but they all work for and are subordinate to us.

That sounds good on paper, Don, but anyone who believes the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Associate Justices are "subordinate to us" might want to have a reality check... up to and including Donald Trump.

And the recourse we have when Congress does not do what we want is to vote for someone else.

Unless, of course, you do something stupid like effectively self-disenfranchising yourself and withhold your vote. I'm going to let you in on a little secret here, Don, but not voting isn't the equivalent of choosing to "vote for someone else."

Yet they keep voting for big money candidates.

Because... let it sink in... choosing not to vote is the exact opposite of choosing to "vote for someone else."

If we can DEMAND Congress remove Trump from office, then we can certainly DEMAND that the candidates for Congress run small donor campaigns and use the recourse provided to replace them if they don't.

By your own admission, the recourse "provided to replace them if they don't" is to "vote for someone else." Ergo, choosing not to vote is allowing others to pick the winner while you and your ilk sit idly by on your ass and your principles.

Imagine a fantastical scenario where Don Harris managed to convince almost every single voter in Texas to join in his exercise in self-disenfranchisement. That may seem impossible, you think, until you realize that Texas is basically a nonvoting state... dead last by nearly every measure in which they calculate voters. That actually would make campaigning easier for candidates who would simply bombard the shit out of me because they'd obviously be keenly aware that they count actual votes that exist, and I'll be picking the winner while the other idiots will be picking their teeth... if applicable. :)

#1 Executive privilege over the Grand Jury sections of the Mueller Witch Hunt report

#2 The Houses fishing expedition over President Trump's tax returns..

#3 Executive Privilege over House's other endeavors..

With each of those, the President is on firm legal ground...

The SCOTUS, except in the extreme circumstance of impeachment, has gone to great lengths to avoid ruling on Executive Privilege..

So, #1 and #3 are firmly in President Trump's favor..

As far as the tax returns, the House has no reason to see those other than to try and find SOMETHING to pin on President Trump...

So, while I'll be the first to admit my SCOTUS predictions haven't been the best, my TRUMP predictions have been universally accurate...

Sorry Dumbocrats.. You lose... Again.. And again... And again... :D

Democrats for too long have ignored the Supreme Court as a political motivator, the Republicans are also about to hand that to the Democrats as well.

Neil makes a very good point here, to which I would simply add the following observation:

Any Court who sides with the Executive Branch and the weak ass arguments they're presenting for their blanket ignoring of the constitutionally mandated oversight by the House of Representatives, Legislative Branch... or the Judicial Branch for that matter... would be essentially finding that the Executive Branch is a branch above the others, and for those who've taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, that would be a clear violation of that promise.

Now I ask you, other than the spineless GOP who are afraid to be tweeted about by the Imbecilic-Bullying-Moronic-Con Artist-In-Chief, what kind of self-respecting lawmaker or jurist in either the Legislative Branch or the Judicial Branch would willingly cede their constitutionally granted co-equal power to any of the other branches of government?

Four of the Supreme Court Justices presiding at the time the SCOTUS ruled unanimously against Nixon were appointed by Nixon himself, and two of the Supreme Court Justices presiding at the time the SCOTUS ruled unanimously against Clinton were appointed by Clinton. So anyone who believes the SCOTUS or any other Court is going to effectively neuter themselves and pronounce themselves irrelevant and beneath the Executive Branch hasn't learned a thing from history... or a thing about constitutionally granted power. :)

Considering how President Trump's approval rating has sky rocketed in the past few weeks, it's much more likely that the people will start demanding that DEMOCRATS remove themselves from office.. :D

Well, considering that the vast majority of the Left Wingery advocate disarmament, the Left's best course of action is secession..

Good riddance and don't let the door hit ya'all on yer Left Wing asses.. :D

The answer to that rhetorical question was answered a quarter of a century later by the American Civil War. The ultimate redress to an unresolved Constitutional crisis is secession and/or civil war. Trump is playing with fire. I suspect a U.S. Civil War II would look a lot like present day Syria.

Congrats.. Your success is well-earned and well-deserved..

Hope all is well with you Michale.

Couldn't be better.. :D Thanx

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1128851321350762498/photo/1

I've been swamped at work for three months - just launched two new products and took over a new team doubling the size of my responsibilities. On a vacation hiking the National Parks of southern Utah (bloody beautiful) and after a week of no work have managed to lift my head and look around again.

Hope all is well with you Michale.

Another reason why cops overwhelmingly support President Trump...

I thought you had been so demoralized and decimated by being SO UTTERLY WRONG about the Dumbocrats' Russia Collusion delusion that you had disappeared into the wilderness..

Glad ta see yer still with us.. I would hate to miss a chance to gloat. :D

There are no facts, they are as much a part of your imagination as "words to that effect" har har.

Reality is a challenge for you Michale.

Didn't happen!!!

And yet, the FACTS show that LEGAL immigrants are overwhelmingly Trump/GOP supporters..

So, once again, the FACTS prove you wrong...

You told us repeatedly that Trump would walk on the moon without a space suit by 2018 if elected in 2016, just to prove that real men don't need oxygen.

Didn't happen!

You said "Trump will win the FIFA World Cup for America EVERY YEAR HE IS PRESIDENT!!!"

Didn't happen.

Yea.. FACTS to the contrary

#ShoutYourAbortion

It is a good time to be a progressive - the brakes are off, the country is about to despise the conservatives even more, and once the power changes and strong voting laws are put in place it will be a generation before conservatives can recover from Trumpism.

Any facts to support your claim?? Beyond wishful thinking, I mean...

It is a good time to be a progressive -

But I do partially agree with you...

The radical Left Wing fringe is in control of the Dumbocrat Party..

That's why it's impossible for Biden to be the Dim nominee..

Richer, non-Hispanic white women have the lowest abortion rates (see source in [29]). Thus forcing women to term will result in more poor, non-white Americans. In two decades these voters are not likely to be supporters of Mitch McConnell's vision of America.

Yea, that's what ya said about ya'all's Russia Collusion delusion..

"Every time Trump speaks against Mueller, it's one more nail in Trump's coffin" or words to that effect..

It's really that simple...

Nearly 1 in 4 women in America have had an abortion, but they keep it to themselves for a range of very good reasons (source: https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2017/abortion-common-experience-us-women-despite-dramatic-declines-rates).

Handing a huge political win to the Democrats by banning abortion is the last thing the politicians on the right want. The nutcases are missing the point - abortion is to rile up the base, not the opposition's base.

Democrats for too long have ignored the Supreme Court as a political motivator, the Republicans are also about to hand that to the Democrats as well.

This, coupled with the desperate tactics to stop people voting by the right are very encouraging from a long term political sense.

It is a good time to be a progressive - the brakes are off, the country is about to despise the conservatives even more, and once the power changes and strong voting laws are put in place it will be a generation before conservatives can recover from Trumpism.

The culture war boils down to progression vs. conservation. Basically it is how much change people want to see in society.

Typically conservatives have used the government and institutions to limit change to incremental steps at the most, whereas progressives have wanted to take large leaps forward. (Remember, I'm talking about societal change, not e.g. tax law here.)

With Trump and McConnell eliminating more and more of the unspoken rules, they are taking the brakes off. The desperation we see in voter suppression and gerrymandering indicate that they know most of the country is against them.

There will be a time, maybe even next year, when the progressives control all the power, and we will be hearing a lot of screaming from the conservatives.

It is encouraging to see their desperation already, but desperation coupled with impotency will result in an even greater spike in right wing terrorism sadly.

Looks like the Dumbocrats and their hysterical KILL ALL THE BABIES platform is on a collusion course with those who think ALL lives matter...

That's the problem with Biden's front runner status..

He has no where to go but down...

The Paul, Weiss saga is a casebook study in the evasions and duplicities that govern the national discourse about race, when any discussion of the academic skills gap is taboo and when racial preferences have become the universal way to engineer “diversity.”
https://www.city-journal.org/exposing-diversity-mandates

That's exactly the problem with Dumbocrats and their identity politics..

Screw the most qualified.. Just choose people based on race..

Apparently, the Dumbocrat Party hasn't fallen far from it's racist/KKK roots, eh? :eyeroll:

Now, if you WANT my opinion on the actions of Holder and Barr, you need but ask...

Or like normal people with multiple brain cells who've demonstrated repeatedly that you possess continuity of thought and the ability to exercise reading comprehension skills, you naturally already know his opinion of Eric Holder because you display none of the stupidity or lack of self-awareness of the hypocritical board troll who appears to believe that every day is a new one where you just make up fake shit and assign it to other people's past while naturally ignoring your own prior statements that are archived and easily searchable by anyone with a computer and a keyboard. :)

My Social Studies teacher once told us that the BEST job experience for being POTUS is being New York Mayor...

So, maybe DeBlowhole has a shot...

And another peon.....

"Captain, if we were to take the phasers and align them with the transitory peons...."
"Hay!!! Don't you 'peon' me!!!"
-Trek Spoof

:D

.... joins the ranks of the Democrat wannabes :D

Really?? So you think Odumbo was "the president" in college???

Com'on, Russ!! I *KNOW* you are more intelligent than you are appearing with this lame comment.. :eyeroll:

I made no comment on the wrongness of either Holder or Barr...

I simply commented on your hypocrisy that you accuse AG Barr of being the President's lawyer (without any facts to support per usual) but you gave Holder a pass for doing the exact same thing...

My point was ya'all's hypocrisy, NOT a judgement on the actions of Barr and Holder..

Duh...

How come???

What does that even mean? You have given no context and do not actually provide a quote, so for all we know Holder made that comment when they were in college trying to pick up women. In which I have no problem with it. If Barr wants to help Trump pick up prostitutes, that’s his choice.

You obviously think what Holder did was wrong, but not what Barr is doing. You are the hypocrite.

Right, Birther?? :D

“We’re in a new moment. This is not Joe Biden’s moment,” Progressive Change Campaign Committee co-founder Adam Green said.
politico.com/magazine/story/2019/05/14/joe-biden-2020-226872

Blue On Blue Civil War... :D Love it..

As I have said, I don't think Biden can win the Primary.. Too many forces of hysterical Dumbocrats aligned against him..

But I admit I could be wrong.. And if I am, if Biden wins the primary, I am going to have a FIELD DAY!!!

For all their hysterical attacks on the GOP as the Party of "old white men", the Dumbocrat Party nominates.....

you guessed it...

AN OLD WHITE GUY!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOITkxy18dY

The political attack ads just write themselves.. :D

“We’re in a new moment. This is not Joe Biden’s moment,” Progressive Change Campaign Committee co-founder Adam Green said.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/05/14/joe-biden-2020-226872

Blue On Blue Civil War... :D Love it..

As I have said, I don't think Biden can win the Primary.. Too many forces of hysterical Dumbocrats aligned against him..

But I admit I could be wrong.. And if I am, if Biden wins the primary, I am going to have a FIELD DAY!!!

For all their hysterical attacks on the GOP as the Party of "old white men", the Dumbocrat Party nominates.....

you guessed it...

AN OLD WHITE GUY!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOITkxy18dY

The political attack ads just write themselves.. :D

You mean, like Eric Holder, who stated explicitly that his job is to be the President's "wingman"...

You mean like that???

Funny how ya'all didn't have a problem with the AG being the President's lawyer when it was an AG and a POTUS who had a -D after their names..

How come???

All of that will change if Trump does defy a Supreme Court ruling.

Why would Trump.. er excuse me.. PRESIDENT Trump have to defy a SCOTUS that rules in his favor???

So now Comey's game plan seems to be an appeal to emotion: We had to investigate the Trump campaign because he is such a terrible person and, as articulated by his investigator, Peter Strzok, someone who had to be “stopped.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/443741-jim-comeys-own-words-justify-bill-barrs-review

Special Prosecutor John Durham's probe is going to be DEVASTATING to Democrats..

Even more devastating that the Mueller Witch Hunt that totally and completely exonerated President Trump with regards to Russia Collusion...

It's gonna be a fun 17 months.. :D

So, she isn't really relevant in anything, is she.. :D

She's so irrelevant, you and the GOP spend an inordinate amount of time discussing her, she stars in thousands of television commercials from coast to coast, and she lives rent free in millions of empty heads all across America. :)

I came up with my plan after we were watching, like, the most important documentary on climate change. It’s called 'Ice Age 2: The Meltdown. That’s not me saying it, that’s science! My Green New Deal will cost, like, 93 trillion dollars. Do you know how much that is? Me neither. Because it’s totally worth it. If sea levels keep rising, we won’t be able to drive to Hawaii anymore!"
-Occasional Cortex Impersonator Ava Martinez

She totally nails Occasional Cortex!!! :D

The video is hilarious!!! :D

https://twitter.com/SICKENLAW/status/1127932246717943809

Well worth the watch...

But they won't.. They'll continue to harass President Trump and ignore the people's business and they will be fired in Nov of 2020...

Your ignorance is on full display here, and your main problem is that your ignorance doesn't allow you to recognize your own ignorance.

The House contains the representatives of the people, by the people, and for the people. The people actually hired them in vast numbers in 2018, wherein your ignorance was again revealed in sweeping and superior fashion. The people hired them to, among other things, perform the checks and balances that Republicans relinquished to the Executive Branch because, among other things, they possess no spinal columns in the exact same way you possess no reasoning skills.

So to recap: Unlike you and the spineless GOP, the people's House as currently constituted is not willing to bend over for the POTUS and to simply relinquish their constitutionally mandated duties to perform checks and balances. Additionally, if you had complained even once about the 8 investigations into Benghazi, people might have to take your hypocritical and mindless bullshit seriously, but you didn't... so they don't. :)

And you don't see the obvious and blatant (not to mention hysterically laughable) hypocrisy in that???

Irregardless of that blind spot, what Speaker Pelosi says is always bullshit anyways...

She accused AG Barr of lying and did not have a SINGLE fact to back it up...

She's afraid to bring impeachment against the President..

So, she isn't really relevant in anything, is she.. :D

Not to nitpick (well, maybe a little... :D)

Has Trump got the Republican Party in such a stronghold that it would allow him to set such a precedent --

Don't you mean "stranglehold"...??

Or maybe "strong hold"...??

Impeachment needs to happen NOW.

House Dems fall in line with Pelosi's no-impeachment strategy despite Trump's defiance

But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told Democrats in a closed-door caucus meeting Wednesday morning to stick to their policy agenda ahead of the 2020 election rather than initiate impeachment proceedings. And not a single lawmaker challenged her.
https://www.chron.com/news/article/House-Dems-fall-in-line-with-Pelosi-s-13849065.php

Sorry, Paula..

Your Dumbocrats don't have the cajones to impeach because they know that A) They will be fired if they do and 2) There is not a single valid and/or factual charge to impeach over..

Democrats had their chance to take down Trump with the Mueller witch hunt and President Trump co-operated albeit reluctantly..

They lost.. They swung and missed..

They should concentrate on actually governing if they want to keep the House in 2020...

But they won't.. They'll continue to harass President Trump and ignore the people's business and they will be fired in Nov of 2020...

Re: #3

"Amazing. Everything you just said was wrong."
-Luke Skywalker

Nothing you have stated is grounds for impeachment, even if it all WASN'T total bullshit..

Which it is...

It won't matter because the courts are going to side with the President..

Richard Nixon also refused to comply with a subpoena from the Senate Watergate Committee in 1973 requesting access to tapes and related documents to their investigation. The issue landed in court and was eventually decided by the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon which required Nixon to comply with the subpoena. It was a close vote wherein the SCOTUS determined the POTUS was not above the law *shakes head* just kidding, it was unanimous against Nixon.

Blackmun, Burger, and Powell were all appointed to the Supreme Court by Richard Nixon himself... so what could go wrong? Well, I'll tell you: Unlike the Dick who appointed all three of them, every one of them took their oath to uphold the Constitution very seriously.

Chief Justice Burger wrote the opinion and was joined by Justices Blackmun, Brennan, Douglas, Marshall, Powell, Stewart, and White... with Rehnquist recusing himself because he had served in the Nixon administration as Assistant AG.

Nixon resigned 16 days later still believing that as POTUS he was above the law. In his famous 1977 interview with David Frost, Nixon stated in multiple different ways that he didn't believe he ever obstructed justice. Nixon accepted a pardon for doing it so the issue of his guilt or innocence was totally moot since accepting a pardon means never having to deny your guilt since you admit your guilt when you accept a pardon for committing said crime(s).

Oh, I wouldn’t want to be a Russian leader. They never know when they’re being taped. ~ Richard Nixon

Those who don't learn from history are destined to repeat it... paraphrasing, of course. :)

How about that Trump is a compromised President on multiple fronts? He denies Russia interfered in our 2016 election in an attempt to get him elected. He lied about and still denies having had any potential business deals in foreign countries during/after the election.

Those ten (+) cases of obstruction of justice (which Trump’s defense is that you cannot obstruct if there was no crime...Trump is as great a legal genius as he is a business genius!)?

How about the 10,000 false statements made by Trump? How can we have faith in anything our president says?

Violation of the Emoluments Clause — no need to wait until what the court decides as Trump has made it clear that he does not believe they can use the work of any other branch of government against him. Congress can decide for itself.

Granted, Pelosi has made it clear that Democrats need to focus on 2020 and ignore the attempts to goad them into impeaching Trump.

This President has been so terrified that the people would not see his presidency as legitimate that he has gone to extreme lengths that delegitimizes his presidency more than anything. Let Trump keep it up until the people start DEMANDING Congress remove him from office.