Yes, Don... I've already agreed you're an asshole, and I would wager I'm not alone in that assessment. You being a demonstrable and admitted "asshole" is yet another very good answer to your question of "why not":

Q: Why not?
A. You're an "asshole." :D

it seems to be the pattern of the trump white house: hide everything, regardless of whether or not there's actually anything to hide. act guilty even when you're innocent. sheesh.

There's plenty to hide. The "we never met with any Russians" goalposts have been moved all the way down to the end of the field, and there's nowhere else to move them. So they're down to stalling and more obstruction of justice, and it will do them no good in the long run. :)

And watch Democrats chase their tails and whine and wail hysterically and do nothing about actually governing..

Yep, Democrats are dancing to President Trump's tune..

:D

Watergate?? Clinton?? yea.. That was impeachment.

Nothing with Iran Contra.. yer full of shit..

So, ALL Nadler and your Dumbocrats have to do is proceed with impeachment and they can see the full un-redacted Mueller report..

Why don't they impeach??

Because they know it will HELP President Trump..

Once again.. You lose :D

That, at least, is what a lot of people with various axes to grind want to cement as conventional wisdom.

The data they hacked and exchanged and attempted to manipulate gets worse from here.

I am completely with you on that score, Paula.

Me three. :)

Damn you're stupid.

You just keep telling yourself that, m'kay? Keep reminding yourself how everyone else has a problem because they can't see the brilliantness of your "idea" and it's everybody else's problem for not flocking to your side and devoting columns all across the Internet to Don Harris. Just keep trolling the forum and reminding yourself how it's everybody else's problem for not seeing your wonderfulness and devoting multiple columns to advertising for your "idea" that is so great that no one but you can see it. Hell, how smart can Ralph Nader really be if he's not singing the praises of Don Harris after being given ample opportunity to do so?

I have none of the credentials normally listed in a bio. No degrees, no years of running a successful business and no experience in political campaigns or activism. I am simply an average person that has been working and living at survival mode. But I have the only credentials that I believe really matters. I am a citizen and I have an idea that may improve our political system. ~ Don Harris

Hey, just one more properly worded comment to CW or Ralph Nader. Then they'll all come around!

It does not address why CW is not interested.

Perhaps he simply read your bio and stopped right there. That bio of yours combined with your daily trolling comments are very convincing, you know. In fact, I think you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who actually read any of your handiwork who isn't thoroughly and completely sold on your admitted ignorance.

But you are not interested in making rational arguments- just being an asshole.

How does one have a "rational argument" with an admitted moron with the bio to prove it? You admittedly lack the ability to have a "rational argument," any whenever multiple commenters on this board have tried repeatedly, they are dismissed by you and simply informed how stupid they are and how they can't see the greatness of Don Harris... which your bio combined with your repetitive trolling for free advertisement makes abundantly clear does not exist.

And yes, I am in the sense that I believe I am right and am not giving up, I do equate myself with those that opposed slavery and worked to get women the right to vote.

You equate yourself with those that opposed slavery, yet it is you who states repeatedly that a journalist has an obligation to shill for you and that you're going to troll his forum repeatedly and curse him on a regular basis until he does his "job" for you for free.

You also equate yourself with those who worked to get women the right to vote, yet your failed political venture is the ultimate exercise in encouraging both men and women to self-disenfranchise in the vast majority of states in America.

And I am equating you with the slaveholders and those that opposed women voting.

The ridiculous notion that an author owes anyone free advertisement and a slogan that contains the words "lose our votes" isn't exactly my "thing," but you might recognize those because they are indeed yours.

As for me personally: I expect no one to perform their "job" for me for free, and I damn sure urge every eligible citizen to vote at every chance I get, and I even go so far as to encourage them to tell anyone like yourself who would endeavor to disenfranchise them in any way whatsoever to sod off and go fuck themselves. :)

Trump lost some money in business ventures.. Just like every other business man in the HISTORY of business men...

When you are to the point where you're writing into comment boxes explaining how every businessman in the history of business has lost billions just like Your Orange Worship, then thank you for the written confirmation that you've bought "all in" to the Trump con.

Oh, sure... a $1.1 billion dollar loss in a decade happens all the time to small businessmen; that's exactly how they know they're so great at it. It's totally normal for every "successful" billion dollar plus loser to acquire/start a business enterprise, obtain bank financing, pull in investors/bondholders with promises you don't intend to keep, contract vendors to perform work for you with no intention of paying them, then squeeze the money out of the business, don't pay your investors/vendors/employees, and walk away with the cash... then lather, rinse, repeat.

Sure... that's perfectly normal business behavior... when you're a con... when you're a fraud. Donald Trump is the ultimate con artist; it's what he does. Then when you can no longer con American banks/investors out of their money, you set up Trump University and con Joe Citizen out of his hard-earned cash and get him to run up credit cards bills via your real estate course scam, and you welcome those Russian investors looking to launder their money through your real estate ventures except you're not exactly a builder anymore... you just sell your brand and launder other people's money.

So, let Democrats run a person who has NEVER lost money in a business venture...

Ya think ya can find one!???

Not a problem, actually, there are millions of people who have never lost money in a business venture and even more multimillions that aren't con artists. But, hey, whatever the Trump sycophants have to tell themselves to delude themselves to make it through their day.

:eyeroll: Jeezus, I am surrounded by delusional morons in here..

Everyone already knows that Shithole is full of delusional morons, and I got bad news for you: Everywhere you go, you're still going to be surrounded by yourself. :D

Sure. Every time they've asked for it. I couldn't find any exceptions.

See: Watergate, Iran-contra, Clinton Scandal, etc.

I am completely with you on that score, Paula.

NEW: The FBI will hold a classified briefing with members of the Florida congressional delegation next week about suspected Russian hacking during the 2016 election, following revelations that Russians hacked into a statewide voter registration database.

Say it with me everyone: HRC lost coz she didn't go to Wisconsin one last time...NOT because of Russian interference, hacking, voter suppression, Comey's press conference... That, at least, is what a lot of people with various axes to grind want to cement as conventional wisdom.

It seems Junior lied. I hate when that happens. :)

But why not is not in any sense the equivalent of no or not interested.

Are you seriously this honking stupid? You seem to have completely misinterpreted what I wrote, which is not altogether hard to understand considering the lack of education you demonstrate in your lengthy yet anemic bio. The gist of what I said is that I believe the answer to "why not" is quite obvious and probably the equivalent or similar to "not interested"... you know... because someone that was genuinely interested would obviously show some interest.

And no and not interested do not in any way address the point of the question- why would CW say no or not interested?

Asked and answered already... and every day no interest was shown and every day it was ignored and unanswered.

But since you can't even make the relatively easy distinction between why not and no/not interested it is doubtful you will be able to grasp this simple concept either.

You know how I keep encouraging you to go to college and get an education? Forget all that; you clearly have reading comprehension problems and would be one of those fools who'd blame the instructors for not being able to "dumb things down" enough for you to grasp the most basic of simple concepts.

I'm sure that many slaveholders were not interested in ending slavery and many men were not interested in allowing women to vote, but that didn't stop people from keeping at it even when they got no for an answer.

You're seriously portraying yourself and your endless effing trolling of this forum in search of free advertising for your failed political venture wherein voters are actually encouraged to self-disenfranchise and comparing it to the suffragists' fight to secure voting rights and the tearing apart of this nation that occurred for the emancipation of colored persons from being bartered and sold as human chattel?

Spew alert. And with that nugget there, you have demonstrated your delusion so much better than I ever could. :)

Presidential aspirant Bernie Sanders brags Medicare for All will prevent Americans from having to choose between food on the table and medicine. Sorry, Bernie, but if your job is eliminated, putting food on your table will be impossible.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/05/08/democrats_plan_to_destroy_the_jobs_boom_140272.html

Democrat Party = The Job Killing Party

Grand Jury info can be released, and that's coming too.

Can you cite me any precedence where Grand Jury information was released to Congress??

The tenor of left-wing cable news and punditry was predictably panic-stricken. After asserting that the cuts wouldn’t help create a single job, Bruce Bartlett told MSNBC that tax relief was “really akin to rape.” Kurt Eichenwald tweeted that “America died tonight … Millenials [sic]: move away if you can. USA is over. We killed it.” “I’m a Depression historian,” read the headline on a Washington Post op-ed. “The GOP tax bill is straight out of 1929,” proclaimed the same writer. And so on.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/03/as-usual-liberals-were-very-wrong-about-tax-cuts/

What *IS* it about Dumbocrats that they are **ALWAYS** wrong?? :D

Grand Jury info can be released, and that's coming too.

It's not even that hard to have it released either; Barr is just refusing to allow it, and the liars in the GOP are telling the sheeple it's impossible. It's Watergate all over again. Don't these morons ever learn from history?

Relax. It'll all get out.

Appendix D. :)

Start spreading the news,
I'm leaving today
I want to be a part of it
New York, New York. ;)

It's "prattling on and on" you mimicking dolt.

Don't worry.. I'll still be here to laugh and point fingers and say I TOLD YA SO.. Just like I did in Nov of 2016... :D

Yes, you are the only person on the board clinging to the election while whining incessantly that everyone else can't get over it; self-awareness isn't exactly your strong suit. You should allow yourself to get over it; there was an election and a 50/50 chance of calling it correctly, and now you can't go two comment boxes without bragging about how you can go potty all by yourself. It's hysterical to watch. You've literally got nothing else except your training potty full of the same stench, different day. :)

Yes, I know ya'all want Mueller to change what he said.. The problem is ya'all are so delusional you that you confuse what you WANT with that the reality is..

Grand Jury info can be released, and that's coming too.

Yea.. We know.. You ALWAYS keep saying "it's coming"...

And you are **ALWAYS** wrong...

Relax. It'll all get out.

As far as Russia Collusion delusion?? Yea. it IS all out.. You lost..

As far as Odumbo and his minions spying on the Trump campaign...

Yer right..

It WILL all get out.. And being a Democrat will be like being a leper... :D

We'd kind of like Mueller to say that.

Whew! talk about party slavery.

Grand Jury info can be released, and that's coming too.

Relax. It'll all get out.

Which is rather apropos since the Democrat Party gave us the KKK and Jim Crow and slavery...

And the dragons are coming.. :D

If I had hundreds and thousands of assets all over the world, of course I would.. ANYONE would..

You see, this is EXACTLY your problem..

You are so blinded by hatred and intolerance that every little nit pick rises to the level of earth shattering catastrophe..

That is exactly why ya'all have no credibility.. You have absolutely NO CONCEPT of choosing your battles and emphasizing the really bad stuff..

To you and your fellow hysterical nimrods, EVERYTHING is earth shatteringly bad..

What? Now looks who's delusional. Of Course the democrats will see it, it's just a matter of when.

Yea, you keep saying that.. Just like you kept saying that President Trump would be frog-marched from the oval office in handcuffs..

You have ALWAYS been wrong..

Grand Jury testimony is SECRET.. It CANNOT be revealed except under the most extraordinary of conditions, such as an impeachment hearing..

Let Dumbocrats start impeachment. THEN they can see it..

But Dumbocrats won't do that because they KNOW how much it will elevate President Trump..

But let me ask you something..

What do you think that 2% of the redacted information will show you??

Do you HONESTLY believe that it will change Mueller's assessment that there was absolutely NO FACTS to support Russia Collusion??

Do you HONESTLY believe that??

Of course you do.. Hence, delusion...

..an average of 100 million dollars per year for ten years. You couldn't burn it that fast.

What? Now looks who's delusional. Of Course the democrats will see it, it's just a matter of when.

Trump's got all of his fingers in the dike. What gives first?

OH MY GODS!!!!

Trump lost some money in business ventures.. Just like every other business man in the HISTORY of business men...

So, let Democrats run a person who has NEVER lost money in a business venture...

Ya think ya can find one!???

:eyeroll: Jeezus, I am surrounded by delusional morons in here..

Ya know what yer so stoopid??

It's the frakin' DEMOCRATS who created the law about Grand Jury secrecy!!!

Let me lay it out so even a dullard as yourself can understand..

Nadler and the other morons will NEVER see the un-redacted Mueller report..

NEVER...

YOU LOST.... That is the only fact that matters..

You LOST and, as in the 2016 election, you simply can't accept that you LOST...

Come Nov of 2020 when President Trump and patriotic Americans celebrate a landslide re-election, you'll still be prattling and yammering on and on about Russia Collusion and other fanciful delusions...

Don't worry.. I'll still be here to laugh and point fingers and say I TOLD YA SO.. Just like I did in Nov of 2016... :D

And yet, the economy is exploding and unemployment is the lowest it's been in DECADES..

So, yea.. The wisdom of the move is self evident..

Except to those who can't get past their hatred of Trump and America..

C'mon, we're still in the first round, and the White House has shot its wad. Nothing?

Okay, we'll use the courts. It'll take longer, maybe up to the election. Then, who knows?

And meanwhile, lots of hearings on topics you're not fond of.

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

That's gonna be spectacular.

Still delusional...

Keep thinking that.

Show me ONE impeachment hearing.. You can't because there are none..

Democrats are too afraid..

Even Pelosi said there is no impeachment..

So, who should I believe??

Her??

Or your deluded fact-less fantasies???

Keep thinking that.

It's gonna take a lot of Russian help this time...

You know what I can't wait for? The first time that Roberts jumps to the other side.

That's gonna be spectacular.

There IS no impeachment fight..

Dumbocrats are too skeered to put forth impeachment..

But that doesn't shut down Congress. Nadler can still hold hearings.

And President Trump can still ignore them... In the interim, President Trump wins re-election by a landslide in 2020...

Either way, Trump's gonna get antsy.

Yea.. You have been saying that for 2+ years now..

And you have ***ALWAYS*** been wrong...

***ALWAYS***

Police Officer Anthony Neri
Sanibel Police Department, Florida
End of Watch: Monday, May 6, 2019

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13839e8d10b9303c8d9aee50576e15b15f4844be91d15073a21097a85b780c50.jpg

On the one hand are the Democrats. They're angry, and after Barr, the gloves have come off.

On the other hand is Trump, and his crude vision of the Constitution. So his game is delay. Send it all to Court.

But that doesn't shut down Congress. Nadler can still hold hearings. So what's Trump's NEXT move?

Reichstag Fire? I seem to remember a conservative pundit named Fromme who suggested that we watch for such a thing.

Either way, Trump's gonna get antsy. He can't restrain himself on Twitter. And Court cases take way to long.

Should be interesting.

Unless you lack opposable mental thumbs. :(

Because "no" doesn't address the question which is why not?

It's kind of honking obvious to everyone with the exception of yourself that "why not" is the equivalent of or something similar to: If he was interested in doing so he would have already done it. "Not interested" isn't a hard concept to grasp. :)

The NSA and multiple intelligence agencies and our FVEY allies among others throughout the world are constantly monitoring Russian nationals and many others from multiple other countries... so much so that if you're meeting with Russians, you can consider yourself being monitored via multiple sources and methods. Our FVEY allies are just as happy to share their intercepts of SIGINT with as we are with them.

Knowing as much as he did and being privy to the myriad of ways our IC collects data and monitors Russian nationals, Michael "Misha" Flynn and multiple others connected to the Trump campaign chose to interact with them anyway and were captured on multiple intercepts via our allies... who were happy to share those intercepts.

The world is about to learn the facts..

The world already knows many of the facts since it was indeed "the world" that came to us and presented their intercepts and collected information.

And Democrats are running scared...

You will know who is running scared by observing who is attempting to cover up counterintelligence investigation information. Hint: It's not Democrats. :)

The political ads against the Dumbocrats all but write themselves...

The Justice Department told lawmakers Tuesday ahead of the panel's session that it would recommend that President Donald Trump assert executive privilege to the material the attorney general has declined to provide.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/justice-department-set-ask-executive-privilege-mueller-report-n1003146

TRANSLATION: SUCK IT, DUMBOCRATS!!!

:D

That’s the path of accountability. The current pseudo-impeachment is a fraud on the Constitution and the American public.

Democrats are afraid to go the Constitutional route because they know they will lose and lose BIG TIME...

Hence all the whining and crying and stamping their feet...

The Pseudo-Impeachment
Democrats hold show trials rather than vote to oust the President.

Democrats are agonizing over impeachment because while they’re itching to do it, special counsel Robert Mueller’s report blew up their Russian collusion hopes. He also took no position on obstruction of justice while reporting a highly critical “analysis” of President Trump’s actions. Democrats now find themselves caught between a left-wing base that says they’ll abdicate their duty if they don’t impeach and Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s cold-blooded calculation that it could cost their majority in 2020.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-pseudo-impeachment-11557271242

The masters of the Kobyashi Maru...

Always creating for themselves the LOSE-LOSE NO-WIN scenario..

The world is about to learn the facts..

And Democrats are running scared...

Remember how ya'all were so excited during the Justice Kavanaugh hearings that someone would challenge Susan Collins for her Senate seat???

'Queer feminist mermaid' Dem aims for Senate seat of Maine's Susan Collins
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrat-queer-feminist-mermaid-steps-forward-to-challenge-maines-susan-collins-for-her-senate-seat-in-2020

I'll give you Democrats one thing..

Ya'all sure now how to pick 'em... :D

Heh

To the rest of the patriotic Americans, the collective question is SO??

You LOST, Stig..

And you LOST **AGAIN** with that bullshit Russia Collusion delusion...

Get over it already.. President Trump is going to be YOUR President until Jan of 2024...

Deal with it..

So, Trump lost over 1 Billion dollars during his Art of the Deal Decade! Only Jacques Cousteau has spend more time under water.

Trump pissed his substantial inheritance away. The Emperor has wet himself! Can we please call the soon to be Pulitzer Prize winning NY Times artcle the Pee Pee Papers?

Q. What does The Donald wear under those baggy suits?

A. Depends!

Why not take "no" for an answer?

Great!!! (Or should I say "GRATE") :D

It is my fervent wish that Democrats do keep on the Russia Collusion delusion to the exclusion of all else..

It will simply make 2020 like 2016, where Republicans made a complete run on all aspects of the government.. :D

So, go ahead, Dumbocrats.. Keep doing the exact same thing over and over hoping for a different result...

I double dog dare ya!!

I double dog dare ya!!

That whole ridiculous nonsensical "purity" spew and the "diversity party" bullshit talking points the GOP useful idiots are spewing falls apart easily with a few very simple facts:

* White guys and partially white guys are actually welcomed in the Democratic Party and are a part of its rich diversity.

* The Democratic Party hasn't had a presidential candidate who actually was a "total white guy" since John Kerry in 2004.

* Therefore, the nomination of a "total white guy" in 2020 (regardless of his age) by Democratic Party voters every 16 years or decade and a half -- give or take -- would actually prove the diversity of the Democratic Party rather than disprove it.

White guys are people too and indeed part and parcel of the rich diversity included in the Democratic Party... a Party that welcomes all kinds across the human skin color spectrum chart... except for Orange Treason Weasels who simply will not be tolerated. :)

Trump Confronts China as Biden Scoffs

But perhaps that willful ignorance emanates from self-interest, as his own son Hunter Biden once accompanied him on Air Force Two as part of a vice-presidential delegation to China. Ten days after that visit, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion joint investment deal with the state-owned Bank of China. Amazingly, one of the technologies that Hunter Biden has invested in alongside China is an app known as Face++, which facilitates Chinese government spying on millions of its own heavily oppressed Uighur citizens. In fact, the Chinese have imprisoned many of these Muslim minorities in concentration camps, directly contradicting Papa Joe’s assurance that the Chinese Communists are “not bad folks, folks.”
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/05/07/trump_confronts_china_as_biden_scoffs_140264.html

Biden has a China problem that is going to kill him in the General, assuming he makes it thru the Primary..

"He's just like taunting, taunting, taunting because he knows that it would be very divisive in the country, but he doesn't really care. He just wants to solidify his base."

And Democrats didn't care that the bullshit Russia Collusion delusion would be VERY divisive for the country..

Democrats just wanted to solidify their base..

So, one (who has common sense and is not enslaved by Party dogam and ideology) has to ask..

What is Pelosi's point???

The State Of New York got some tax information (not returns, just information) on the pretext of some legal issue..

And what did they do?

They IMMEDIATELY leaked that confidential and private information to the Propaganda Arm of the Democrat Party, the Leftist media...

Proving beyond ANY doubt (as if any proof was needed) that this isn't about justice..

It's SOLELY about obtaining a new shiny bludgeon with which to beat President Trump over the head with..

Keep in mind, that Hillary lead Obama by 20 points in the polls of 2008...

Then she came in 3rd in Iowa...

As I said..

Democrats want Purity.. Not Electability..

They want a candidate who checks the MOST boxes, not the candidate who checks a SINGLE box...

When Democrats play it safe and “fall in line,” the results are devastating—as Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry made plain. If Biden wins the nomination next year, it will be because Democrats went with their heads, not their bleeding hearts. But Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign is a cautionary tale.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/joe-biden-electability-argument-is-how-democrats-lose-elections

I still say that Biden can't win the primary because the Democrat Party today is a PURITY Party, not an Electability Party...

That being said, if Biden DOES manage to pull it out, it will forever stain the Democrat Party as the Diversity Party..

For all their talk of diversity and minorities and identity politics, when all is said and done.... The Democrat Party nominates an old white guy to be their champion..

So, either way, it's a win-win for me.. :D

Only two choices still open, you say? Did you perchance forget about the very real possibility that Ms. Abrams might be tapped as a vice presidential running mate, mate? As long as Biden remains the front runner and can translate those polling numbers into actual votes at the polls, I'd say that's a very real possibility. :)

Not a joke!

Catching up to do, indeed. Like discovering that a vote for the 'Iraq Resolution' was not a "vote for war".

Speaking of Iraq, I don't recall hearing anything about what Senator Sanders did to fix the mess that was US policy in Iraq. Besides, of course, voting for Senator Biden's sense of the senate resolution detailing a proposal to change US policy toward Iraq and support federalism as a way forward for the failing state.

Or, did Sanders vote for that - was he one of the 23 senators who misguidedly voted against it?