So, for the record, “cock holster” is NOT a gay slur.

I know, right!? Many of the troops and veterans I've had the pleasure to work with and get to know have been throwing that term around for many decades, actually. For those not familiar with the colorful and colloquial terminology used by the various assorted branches of our United States armed forces, if a service member or veteran tosses that term in your general direction, it's likely to be a soldier or Marine versus an airman or sailor... particularly if it's a "boot" fresh out of camp because they've been hearing it for weeks on end. Oohrah!

And to the Trump-trolls with all of their manufactured snow-flakey thin-skinned and politically correct bullshit about Colbert's choice of language to describe Benedict Donald's coziness with Vladimir Putin -- the only person on the planet Hair Dick-Tater will not insult -- when your whining and moaning about Trump's "grab them by the kitty" phrase meets the level of your outrage over Colbert's language, perhaps somebody might take you seriously. Until then, you would be wise to "clue in" to the fact that not everyone is as easily conned as are you garden variety un- and undereducated Cult45 minions, goobers, and hayseeds. :)

*laughs* :)

Suffice as to say, I chose not to undertake a republican party hazing ritual.

LL&P

My recent trip to the land of the three-toed people and cable tv was interesting in that I got to spend time in FOX & Friends. I thought to myself it was odd that Tucker Carlson was telling no one who watches his show what they were thinking. I assumed un-hingement was in response, and tandem, to Trump doing the same at some conclave of evangelical clerics. Apparently, according to Trump, ANTIFA plans to mug America when the Democrats retake the house, after the democrats undo all their (Trump and the ecumenical right) moral imperatives.

One thing's for certain, if FOX is telling the right what the left is doing, the opposite is more likely the truth.

LL&P

So, for the record, “cock holster” is NOT a gay slur.

You used a gay slur... I called you on it.. You denied it.. I provided proof...

Let me make myself perfectly clear. You are a Trump cockholster. It wasn't the first time I called you that on this board and probably won't be the last. That was meant as an insult to you and no one else. If you want to get all "politically correct" and whine and make more out of it than was meant to be, then be my effing guest. None of your whining PC bullshit will change the fact that you're a Trump cockholster.

If you want to quit being a total bitch and attacking people who disagree with you in the most vile and disgusting ways, then it will stop..

Who do you think you're fooling?

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/08/24/ftp497/#comment-125277

You didn't need my help when you told another poster to "suck my dick" so why must you blame me for everything? It is pathetic and transparent that you insist your behavior is anyone's fault except your own. Don't let's pretend otherwise, m'kay?

Stop the shit and the shit will stop...

Liar. You will post as you please while whining about others making you do it. You will attempt to censor everyone except yourself. Your problem is that you want to dish it out to everyone else while trying to control what others are allowed to post. It's obvious to everyone except yourself.

Figure out the fact that you want to post as you please while censoring others; it's glaringly obvious to everyone else except you.

Done here.

You used a gay slur... I called you on it.. You denied it.. I provided proof...

NOW you are trying to put it on me when it was YOU who started with the gay slur....

If you want to quit being a total bitch and attacking people who disagree with you in the most vile and disgusting ways, then it will stop..

You have been told before and not just by me..

Stop the shit and the shit will stop...

I'm saying stop trying to start shit on the blog that doesn't exist. Enough already with your fabrication and outright lying. It's asinine and unnecessary.

Cock holster is a homophobic slur... Or gay slur....

At least it was when Colbert did it..

Stephen Colbert tried to insult Donald Trump. He made a homophobic comment instead.
The comedian used an insult that mocks gay men.
https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/5/2/15515066/stephen-colbert-trump-putin-homophobia-late-show

Are you completely unaware that everyone has a mouth regardless of sexual preference?

Ahhhh So you are saying YOU are a "cock holster"...

OK.. If you say so...

WaPoop??

FBI study from the Trump administration.

If I am saying the opposite of WaPoop then I am DEFINTELY factually accurate by default..

Read the FBI study that came out recently during the administration of Your Worship. It'll be like cracking a book and learning something instead of spewing your fabrications.

Ahhhhh so NOW yer resorting to homophobic slurs???

Not remotely. Are you completely unaware that everyone has a mouth regardless of sexual preference? Your ignorance is showing... again.

Wish I could say I was surprised....

Wish I could say you had a brain with which to think.

Pretty sad that you would resort to gay slurs, when there is a gay man in our little community.. :^/

Pretty sad when you recently posted "suck my dick" to another poster that you'd try to mischaracterize someone else's post as a "gay slur." Are you unaware that anyone can be a CH? Please try more thinking and less trying to start fights among other posters. You may now resume your normal position as Trump CH. :)

Cock Holsters

Ahhhhh so NOW yer resorting to homophobic slurs???

Wish I could say I was surprised....

Pretty sad that you would resort to gay slurs, when there is a gay man in our little community.. :^/

Then, I'll assume you'll come to my defense when I am attacked for not posting proof?? :D

J/K..

I'll refrain.. My bust.. :D

One party tried to keep guns out of the hands of those with mental problems. Hint: it wasn't the GOP...

We have been over that, CW... Unless you want to state for the record that not being able to balance one's checkbook equates to mental illness, that rule was an Obama overreach in a lame attempt to circumvent the 2nd Amendment..

The simple fact is, Democrats want to protect the personal privacy of mass shooters and make sure these scumbag shooters are not stigmatized by the label of mental illness...

This is FACT that no amount of spin can take away...

OK, the economy is doing better than I thought it would under Trump. Happy?

"Ecstatic.."
Jafar, ALADDIN

:D

There you have it, people.. ^^*THAT*^^ is what integrity looks like...

But I do have to quibble with your stats.

Of course you do.. :D

While true, incomplete. Black unemp. stats have only been kept since the 1970s

THAT is what I told Neil.. But he insisted that the stats in "the 50s and 60s" were lower. He can't admit he was wrong..

Right. But it works both ways. You CAN'T state "LOWEST it's been in history" when the official history only goes back to 1972. Period.

So, if I add the word "official" yer OK with it??

Then YOU can't say that Odumbo was the first time a black man was elected as leader of the free world because you don't know that there wasn't a black man as leader of the free world back before recorded history...

Right??

Is that quibbling necessary???

The FACT is, under President Trump, black American unemployment is the lowest it's been in history... If it makes you feel better to mentally add a qualifier, be my guest.. It's yer blog, after all. :D

But the fact remains the same.. :D

Except it's NOT a law...

It's yer anti-gun wet dream..

So YOUR entire premise is nothing but a fantasy..

'nuff said..

If I am saying the opposite of WaPoop then I am DEFINTELY factually accurate by default..

Neil is exactly right, as usual. You don't even try to research anything. You just make up bullshit and generally provide ZERO proof to back up your fabrications because there's not any.

A 1-minute search easily produces this FBI study released recently by the Trump Administration (which report is linked in the article):

The study, which examined dozens of active shooters between 2000 and 2013, found that contrary to the public perception of the episodes as being fueled by mental health issues — an assertion frequently given voice by politicians, including President Trump — law enforcement officials were able to verify that only about 25 percent of the attackers had diagnosed mental health issues.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/06/20/active-shooters-usually-get-their-guns-legally-and-then-target-specific-victims-fbi-says/?utm_term=.5fac69ce8d56

Once again, the FACTS bear out..

ALL mass killings had a mental health aspect where the shooters have ALL had mental health issues prior to their violence...

Michale is wrong again.

Crack a book and/or do some simple research! :)

My link comes from the governmental BLS web site..

OK, you're joking right?

You do know what Fred is?

You do know that FRED stands for "Federal Reserve Economic Data"

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/

Do you even try to research anything?

You may be right. I was more interested in the Democratic position than projecting past the election.

neilm [6] -

Now that's a sobering list. There were plenty of people who supported Nixon to the very end, too (around 25% if memory serves).

Mezzomamma [11] -

Amen to that.

Michale [18] -

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/2/3/14496774/congress-guns-mental-illness

One party tried to keep guns out of the hands of those with mental problems. Hint: it wasn't the GOP...

[Also, Michale, I have to warn you about posting full articles here. Please don't get me into copyright trouble -- post a paragraph or three, at the most, but just post a link to the full article... thanks.]

neilm [28] -

Heh.

Michale [40] -

OK, the economy is doing better than I thought it would under Trump. Happy?

But I do have to quibble with your stats.

Black unemployment is THE LOWEST it's been in history..

While true, incomplete. Black unemp. stats have only been kept since the 1970s. So it is true to say they're the lowest they've been historically since being measured, that's not quite the same thing.

Same for Hispanic stats -- they didn't used to break them out.

And you do realize, don't you, that we'll all be quoting you if the market heads south during Trump's term -- if you take the credit, then be prepared to accept the blame...

:-)

But let's flip it, too. How about you admitting that the economy under Obama gained strength since the depths of the crash? Longest bull market in history, most of which happened under Obama. So where's your non-partisan, cross-party credit for that... hmmm?

[49] -

OK, now you're making my case against you.

You CAN'T prove it because there is no DATA for those years.

Right. But it works both ways. You CAN'T state "LOWEST it's been in history" when the official history only goes back to 1972. Period.

Balthasar [86] -

First, THANK YOU for returning us to the subject at hand (and apologies for all caps, I've been answering Michale... heh).

Nice Edwards quote. But your "Moore's the pity" was downright hilarious! Well done!

:-)

My take is similar -- it takes getting wiped out in an election for a party to seriously rethink their positions. If the blue wave materializes, I think there will be GOPers who reconsider how close they're tying themselves to Trump's fortunes. However, if that's the case, then Dems will have picked up most competitive districts in the House already (that big blue wave). So the shift in GOP thinking might happen in the Senate, where statewide races are always tougher to win on an extremist platform. And, conveniently, the Senate is where the votes would be needed to remove Trump.

Heh.

:-)

OK, enough of this...

-CW

Do you have conversations in your head between yourself and "ya'all" - because I've never seen most of the things you claim "ya'all" said on this thread?

He fabricates whatever he needs. Unfortunately for him, he's the only one on this blog that appears gullible enough to fall for this type con of his.

Maybe one person sometimes, sort of obliquely, if you spin things the way you want them to be spun, but when I ask repeatedly for links to things "ya'all" said you suddenly change the subject and claim we won't believe you even if you post links.

It's similar to the multiple cons that Trump constantly employs:
* Bullshitting
* Outright Fabrication

The sad part is that it's only the gullible morons and bullshitters themselves who believe the constant steady stream of invented spewage. :)

But we're talking about the lowest rate in history, NOT the rate of fall..

Michale [40]

But you are an admitted NeverTrumper who would NEVER concede that Trump has done good, even if the FACTS prove it.. ~ Michale

Do you even read your own posts, Michale Moron? You're bitching that people aren't conceding that Trump "has done good," and I'm posting the numbers as to why nobody is all that impressed and why you are a hysterical hypocrite and gullible asshole for claiming we should be impressed with the weaker numbers of Trump. Additionally, you keep whining that no one will give Trump "credit where credit is due," while I'm pointing out that his shit is weaker than the guy you hysterically whine about. Got that? It's not complicated.

Question: If Trump's numbers are worse than the guy you pillory on a regular basis, how effing great can they be?

Answer: They're not that effing great, and you're a gullible moron complaining we don't give him enough credit. Meanwhile, you're whining about Obama daily when he easily outperformed Your Orange Worship.

So, as usual, Victoria is just acting like a mental defective, trying to deflect from the argument..

That's not deflection, Michale Moron, it's exactly on point. Speaking of deflection, perhaps in the throes of your TCH Stupor, you have confused me with the hysterical moron on this board who whines about Hillary and Obama every time anybody posts something about His Orange Worship. That guy complaining about "deflection" is the definition of hysterical hypocrite. :)

Similar to what a crack-whore would act like, desperate for a fix...

Tell us more about you and your wife's problems. We never tire of hearing how desperate you and your crime family are! :)

Speaking of ya'alls crack problem: It's never too late to crack a book!

SO TO RECAP

If you want everybody here to get all excited about Trump's "weak shit" and claim incessantly that we've got problems because we won't admit how great Trump is, you just might want to get your data in order first and make sure that his numbers aren't shittier than Obama's or somebody is bound to come along and point out the FACT that you're a GULLIBLE ASSHOLE. :)

Which prevents someone diagnosed with a mental illness from then purchasing a firearm... great!

And what about those that purchased a gun the day before having a psychological evaluation? That is why a gun registry is needed!

THAT man is going to be fined!!!???

If he doesn’t register his firearm as the law requires, then he is NOT a “law abiding citizen”, is he? Your whole rant is once again negated.

The overwhelming majority of black folk don't say that. Trust me on that one.

Trying to decide between SKYSCRAPER and UPGRADE....

Any suggestions about either??

They never found a mental health issue in the Las Vegas shooter. Biggest mass shooting of this century so far.

Unreasonable Search & Seizures, which are obviously unconstitutional..

I wish the SCOTUS Republican majority agreed with you, but they don't.

Except a gun registry is nothing but a prelude to gun confiscation and will do NOTHING to prevent gun violence..

..says the gun lobby in the only first-world country where gun violence is endemic.

Actually, while being awesome at the start and kind of murky in the middle, LOST finished REAL strong.. I cried at the end of LOST..

Whereas the OTHER big finisher at the time, '24' didn't move me much at all..

MANIFEST has potential, but yer right.. We'll have to see where it goes..

Let's say that it doesn't matter.

Of course it "doesn't matter"... The numbers ONLY matter when ya'all are right, eh??

Thank you for proving my point..

Even when I provide bona-fide FACTS to prove my comments, ya'all ignore the facts or spin the facts or claim that the FACTS "don't matter"...

But it's interesting that the current high black employment rate (that you think Obama had nothing to do with)

Obama did NOTHING for black Americans.. That's what black Americans say today...

So, what you are saying is a perfectly law abiding citizen who owns a gun per his 2nd Amendment rights and uses that gun to defend his wife and children from slaughter by some scumbag who doesn't care about your laws....

THAT man is going to be fined!!!???

*THAT* is what you are all about???

VERY disappointed, Russ...

VERY disappointed...

Yes, it does. But Lost started out looking awesome. We'll have to see where it goes from there.

In Dec of 1973, the unemployment rate for black Americans was 9.0%...

Let's say that it doesn't matter. 1973 was the oil embargo, and the death throes of the Nixon administration. Blacks were laid off first.

But it's interesting that the current high black employment rate (that you think Obama had nothing to do with) is a good counter-argument to C.R.'s 'productive vs. 'unproductive' nonsense. Turns out, when jobs are available, even the shitty ones that predominate at the lower levels of this economy, poor folks will grab them up, just as if they weren't lazy or something. Imagine that.

Except a gun registry is nothing but a prelude to gun confiscation and will do NOTHING to prevent gun violence...

It isn’t that hard to work through the details when you don’t automatically jump to hysterical rantings of your rights being violated!

How are you going to find out if people own guns are not??

Unreasonable Search & Seizures, which are obviously unconstitutional..

It's MUCH easier to loosen privacy laws and combine mental health records with gun purchase records..

But you Democrats DON'T want to do that because you lose a political agenda..

Get rid of the 2nd.. Eviscerate the 1st, 4th and 10th Amendments.

THEN you can have your gun ban AKA Gun Confiscation AKA Gun Registry...

Until then, hysterical whining and crying is counter-productive...

But we're talking about the lowest rate in history, NOT the rate of fall..

So, as usual, Victoria is just acting like a mental defective, trying to deflect from the argument..

Similar to what a crack-whore would act like, desperate for a fix...

And how will you enforce this gun registry on past buyers????

Gun owners will be required to register their guns by a given date, after which point they would be treated like any other person who is found in possession of an unregistered firearm — they are ticketed (which would automatically enter the gun into the registry) and pay a fine, or they forfeit the firearm. Choice is yours.

It isn’t that hard to work through the details when you don’t automatically jump to hysterical rantings of your rights being violated! But you aren’t interested in actual discussions, you prefer talking down to people, we get it!

Black American unemployment is the LOWEST it's been in history..

So says LA TIMES, VOX, HUFFPOOP and WAPOOP..

Once again, ya'all are wrong..

I am factually accurate...

No problem.. I am happy you can concede your error and admit you were wrong..

Should be 3 +victims excluding the shooter.

Actually, the FBI defines "mass shooting" as 4+ more victims where it's not a family/friends shooting...

Meaning a non domestic or familiar shooting where the victims are largely unknown or un-acquainted with the shooter..

So, for example, a domestic involving a large family member victim contingent would not be considered a "mass shooting" as it is defined..

Irregardless of all these facts, there is one fact that remains above all other..

BY DEFINITION, mass shooters ALWAYS have a mental health component...

Push, push, push...

Not much fun when yer on the receiving end, eh Neil... :D

But it's not, so you don't..

My bad! Didn’t proof read before I entered. Should be 3 +victims excluding the shooter.

But my main point, that not all mass shootings are committed by people with a history of mental illness, remains correct.

During the Obama administration,
"Black or African American unemployment" fell:
* 1.0 percentage points in 2016
* 1.9 percentage points in 2015
* 1.5 percentage points in 2014
* 1.8 percentage points in 2013

https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000006

During the Trump administration,
"Black or African American unemployment" fell:
* 1.1 percentage points in 2018 (to date/incomplete data)
* 1.0 percentage points in 2017

Question: Where were the Trump Cock Holsters when Obama was posting annual numbers equal to and much higher than Trump's?

It's comical that Cult45 and their useful idiots expect everybody else to get excited about Trump's weaker numbers that can't even measure up to those of Barack Obama. #Pathetic

The TCH's are totally unaware that the numbers for which they criticized Obama are even higher than the ones they expect everybody else to get all excited about. If you're hypocritical and ignorant enough to hysterically sing the praises of Donald Trump while you whined incessantly about Obama's weak numbers, here's your dunce cap:

************ MANIPULATED AMERICAN ************
**************** GULLIBLE ASSHOLE ***************

Try it.

Your link comes from someone named Fred...

My link comes from the governmental BLS web site..

Your link "works" but is still bullshit..

Obviously, you are too stoopid to use the BLS website...

But, as I said.. I still like ya.. :D

The fact remains.. In Dec of 1973, the unemployment rate for black Americans was 9.0%...

Incidentially, VOX, LA TIMES, WAPOOP and HUFFPOOP all concede that black unemployment is the LOWEST it's been in history....

So, you are taking gun confiscation....

And how will you enforce this gun registry on past buyers????

There goes the 4th Amendment...

You see the slippery slope you propose??

But, as I said.. Fine..

Get rid of the 2nd, eviscerate the 1st, 4th and 10th Amendments and you can have your gun ban...

Until then, shut up about it..

Deal??

And if 2 or more defined a "mass shooting" then you would have a point.

But it's not, so you don't..

And YOU, of all people, should know better...

I am very disappointed, Russ...

The problem is how you define "LIE" when it comes to President Trump..

That's how I know yer claim is bullshit..

It is, in fact, a lie..

Appealing to Sci-Fi fans...

First Act to new Show...MANIFEST
https://www.imdb.com/videoplayer/vi2300164889

Doesn't that look AWESOME!!!????

I respect the hell out of that..

Hey everyone, Michale respects the hell out of the guy who consistently wrongly accuses people of deeds they didn’t commit! I am SHOCKED!!!

My bad on that!

I LOVE how excited you get when you catch one person who opposes Trump in a lie!

Lanny Davis & CNN: 1....Donald Trump : over 4000!

If one makes them “outright liars”, then what would another 4000 make them? President? Unindicted Co-conspirators?

While that makes a great talking point on the NRA channel, it is not true. Plenty of shootings involving 2 or more victims have been committed by people who have never been diagnosed with a mental disorder.

I am all for making sure people who suffer from mental disorders are prevented from having access to guns, but that will require a national gun registry be put in place to catch people who have purchased guns prior to be diagnosed with a mental illness from slipping through the cracks.

San Diego has been part of a pilot program where the city will remove firearms from any location that authorities are called to assist citizens suffering from mental illness. Families are also able to contact the city if they fear that their loved one is a danger to themselves or others and the police will hold the firearms until a court can make a determination of the threat posed by the firearms.

One reason a gun registry is needed over the current system for background checks is that with mental health issues, the need to restrict access to firearms is not permanent as it is with someone convicted of a felony. The system will have to allow for the courts and police departments to alter the files as needed, which the current background system does not allow for. (Presently, info can be entered easily, but cannot be removed accept by going through a very lengthy process.)

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS14000031

Try it.

Guys, I had AGW Deniers as #6 (Anthropogenic Global Warming)
????

Yes, you sure did, Neil... mea maxima culpa. I was looking for the QAnon morons and so totally missed it. :)

I followed the link. It was a typical example of your "facts" - i.e. it doesn't exist.

Here is the link you posted, try to follow it yourself:

https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet

Fail!

Again, just post a link to a comment where "ya'all" said the thing you claim. This is a repeated failure on your part - frequently I've asked you to post links to "ya'all said" claims and every single time you have failed hopelessly to back up your claim.

As usual you ignored it because it proved you wrong..

The link didn't work. It gave an error. I told you twice.

Sad.

Plus I asked for links to back up one of "ya'all said" claims - this just means finding statements on cw.com that support your claim - and you failed again.

Paraphrasing the venerable Edwin Edwards of Louisiana: it seems that the only way that Trump will get impeached is if he's caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy.

He's got the Republican Party by the nuts: conservatives are afraid of the sway that he holds over their voters, and moderates are afraid of primary challenges.

If, on the other hand, it turns out that his endorsements don't help house candidates this fall, his grip on their gonads might loosen. His primary endorsement record wasn't all that good. Moore's the pity.

If the Dems don't take the house this fall, it's all academic anyway. They should focus for the next two years on exposing the truth about Trump, and let justice take its course.

Such disrespect!

I gave you a link..

As usual you ignored it because it proved you wrong..

Do you have conversations in your head between yourself and "ya'all" - because I've never seen most of the things you claim "ya'all" said on this thread?

Oh you do... Ya'all just can't acknowledge it because it proves you wrong..

Like I did with your bullshit claim that the black unemployment rate in Dec of '73 was 5.3%...

and claim we won't believe you even if you post links.

I proved beyond ANY doubt that you won't accept my links when I gave you the BLS link that showed the black Unemployment rate in Dec of '73 was 9.0%...

You don't even have the competence to follow the link..

Do you have conversations in your head between yourself and "ya'all" - because I've never seen most of the things you claim "ya'all" said on this thread?

Maybe one person sometimes, sort of obliquely, if you spin things the way you want them to be spun, but when I ask repeatedly for links to things "ya'all" said you suddenly change the subject and claim we won't believe you even if you post links.

Now we insist on links to back up our "facts" ;)

Such disrespect!

Oh, he is often wrong, no doubt about that..

But here's the thing...

My respect for him has nothing to do with right or wrong..

It has to do with INTEGRITY... Greenwald has it in spades...

He is like things USED to be here in Weigantia... We used to disagree, but respected each other's opinions..

I'm not sure that we know the facts, yet.

And yet, ya'all CLAIMED to know the FACTS beforehand eh??

But NOW that Lanny and CNN et al has been exposed as the outright liars they are....

NOW ya'all go "Hmmmmmmm We're not sure of the FACTS"

Just trying to spin an outright catastrophe....

Ya'all been had.. THat is all there is too it..

As it is for Yahoo, Bing, Ebay, Amazon, and any other internet platform operating in China.

ANd if any of those had a TENTH of the clout that Google has, you would have an argument..

But they don't so you don't..

As it is for Yahoo, Bing, Ebay, Amazon, and any other internet platform operating in China.

We complain about them blocking political content, they complain that we block cheap knock-offs and bootleg streaming content.

Careful Michale, I'm fairly sure that he's more anti-American than you're probably comfortable with, once you get to know him.

I think he's a tool.

I'm not sure that we know the facts, yet. The possibilities are:

A. Lanny is now telling the truth that he lied to CNN.

B. Lanny is lying now and told the truth before.

C. The truth changed: Cohen was willing to sing but not anymore, or blurted out later, "I wasn't actually in the room.."

D. It's a ruse: he's trying to bait Mueller.

E. Oops. Shouldn't have had a Scotch with lunch.

He is wrong a lot more than he is right, but he is *ALWAYS* consistent.....

He calls a spade a spade and to hell with what people WANT to hear...

I respect the hell out of that..

The substance of the CNN story itself regarding Cohen – which made headline news all over all the world and which CNN hyped as a “bombshell” – has now been retracted by other news outlets that originally purported to “confirm” CNN’s story. That’s because the anonymous source for this confirmation, Cohen lawyer Lanny Davis, now admits that, in essence, his “confirmation” was false. As a result, both the Washington Post and the NY Post outed Davis as their anonymous source and then effectively retracted their stories “confirming” parts of CNN’s report.
https://theintercept.com/2018/08/28/cnn-credibly-accused-of-lying-to-its-audience-about-a-key-claim-in-its-blockbuster-cohen-story-refuses-to-comment/

Once again, the Leftist Lame Stream Media has had to retract a bullshit story that had no factual basis..

And, once again, CNN stands by this bullshit story that has no factual basis...

Ya'all go on and on hysterically about President Trump's low approval numbers...

Funny how you ignore the FACT that the Leftist MSM's approval numbers are even LOWER.....

Funny, eh? :^/

Google plays censor: Tech giant is helping China suppress information
http://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/editorials/2018/08/27/Google-plays-censor-Tech-giant-is-helping-China-suppress-information/stories/201808270012

Apparently these actions are SOP for GOOGLE...

And the bad news for Democrats continue...

This will be the first time I vote Republican for FL Senate...

Weird... :D

Looks like it's you who is losing so you throw out more bullshit and then go home.. :D

You can't give President Trump credit for ANYTHING...

It causes you physical pain...

It's one of the sad symptoms of HHPTDS...

I shouldn't ride you so hard.. It's not yer fault. Yer just sick and don't know any better..

I'll try and ease up on ya...

:D

You claimed that the unemployment rate for black Americans was 5.3 in Dec of '73..

The FACT is, according to the BLS web site, the unemployment rate for black Americans was 9.0 in Dec of '73...

You were wrong... I have PROVEN you were wrong...

And you STILL whine and cry that you were right..

As I have proven, you simply CAN'T admit when you are wrong, even though the FACTS clearly show that...

Just like you CAN'T concede that Consumer Confidence is rocking under President Trump..

After the mediocre 'eh' economics of yer messiah, Odumbo... President Trump swoops in and gives Americans a GREAT and BOOMING and ROARING economy..

No wonder yer so pissy.. All yer predictions turned out to be bullshit.. :D

And NOW, on top of all that, the one bright spot you had, the Cohen fiasco has turned out to be a laughable nothing burger... :D

"Neil... I'm laughing at the superior intellect.."

:D

You can't prove anything, and are losing, so you are taking your ball and going home.

Zing! I win.

Why?? You always deny the facts, even when they are confirmed

No, I read them then post links to sites that prove you were deceived.

I'm educating you. For free. Some gratitude would not be amiss.

As a continual series that is searchable, yes. But the numbers were collected in Censuses and other non-cyclical analysis.

There are data points that prove that the numbers were lower. You just can't handle reality as usual.

It is a bit like your uric acid level - you get it measured once per year, then your doc freaks and puts you on a monthly testing regime and you have cyclical numbers.

Data is my thing Michale. I thought you'd have figured that out by now.

Posting feel good nonsense from right wing websites and claiming them as "facts" is your thing.

Why?? You always deny the facts, even when they are confirmed..

Sorry, son.. You have proven beyond any doubt you are not debating in good faith, you are simply pushing buttons..

This is why it's useless with you..

NOW you move the goal posts AGAIN because you got caught spewing shit..

The black unemployment rate for DEC 1973, which is the month YOU quoted was 9.0...

That is according to the BLS website..

Once again I prove what it's useless to give you facts... You never accept them even when they are substantiated..

Because you simply CANNOT accept that you are WRONG again...

Really. Post a link then.

Michale 9:30AM: Post the data he made up on 1973 and a link that does not work.

Fish. Barrel. Bang.

So, you just have to know that if the Left rags are saying it, it HAS to be accurate, right?? :D har har

Regardless, VOX admits that the government didn't start separating the numbers until the 70s...

So, yer 50s and 60s claim is bullshit..

Your TOTAL BS claim that the unemployment rate for Black Americans was lower than it is today is outright fantasy...

Once again... Yer wrong and you can't admit it..

BLS numbers show Black unemployment was lower in the 1970's, lower in the early 1950's and decreased further during the 1950's.

Thus the claim that Black unemployment has never been so low is a lie. Again.

Plus, at 6.1% it isn't anything to be proud of - it is still significantly higher than white unemployment and the income numbers are still sadly lower.

Always willing to help a brother out... :D

NOW you are moving the goal posts??? Figures..

No, you just ignored my hint earlier:

https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4449

Page 11:

"Unemployment — Table 13 shows that for both Negro men and women the average rate of unemployment, from 1947 to 1951, has been more than 50 percent above that for whites. Although the rate was about 5 percent for Negroes in 1951, compared with 3 percent for whites, about the same relative improvement had taken place since 1949 when the economic situation was less favorable. (Chart 11)"

Bureau of Labor Statistics

So, as usual, you search the Internet to cherry pick a site that is obviously biased and completely wrong...

There is a link even YOU should be able to find.. :^/

Your request was invalid for this Data Access Service. Please attempt other data requests. Thank you for using LABSTAT

Hay, if yer too stoopid to know how to do research, just admit it...

:D

You went to some moron named "Fred"... :^/

Except I just proved you were full of shit..

1. For saying 50s and 60s and then changing it to '73

2. For claiming that the UEP for black Americans was 5.3 in Dec of 73 when the FACTS clearly prove that it was 9.0 in Dec of 73...

You are WRONG, Neil...

Why can't you admit it???

Here is a hint: When I tease you into getting excited about some fact you are wetting your pants about and get you to go out on a limb, I've got data to prove you wrong.

And your "data" is full of shit...

I would think you would have caught on after all these years of getting your ass kicked.. :D

My link still works and you can see the 5.2% number yourself (I mistyped earlier - it should be even lower - 5.2%, not 5.3%

Tuesday, August 28, 2018 12:31 PM

Your request was invalid for this Data Access Service. Please attempt other data requests. Thank you for using LABSTAT

You said "50s and 60s"

NOW you are moving the goal posts??? Figures..

Will you admit you were deceived by liars?

No...

1973
JAN 9.1
FEB 9.5
MAR 9.4
APR 9.9
MAY 9.6
JUN 9.8
JUL 9.8
AUG 9.2
SEP 9.7
OCT 8.8
NOV 9.3
DEC 9.0
https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet

Will YOU admit you are full of shit?? :D

Because THAT is what the FACTS clearly show...

Admit you are wrong.

And where are the quotes you claim I made about the economy?

You can never prove anything.

Here is a hint: When I tease you into getting excited about some fact you are wetting your pants about and get you to go out on a limb, I've got data to prove you wrong.

I thought you'd have caught on to this after years of it.

https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet

So the claim that, under President Trump, the black unemployment rate for black Americans is the LOWEST it's been in history is a factually accurate..

Nice try at your spin... But THAT is all you have....

Spin...

You CAN'T handle the FACTS because you CAN'T handle you were wrong...

Prove it...

I knew ypou'd believe anything you read that made the traitor look good:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS14000031

Dec 73: 5.3%
Jul 18: 6.1%

Will you admit you were deceived by liars?

No, I didn't. Prove it.

Prove it...

Once again, Neil.. Either by commission or omission, you said that a President Trump election would trash the country, trash the economy...

The FACTS prove you wrong..

Yet, you can't admit you were wrong..

A symptom of HHPTDS.....

No. It was lower in the 1950's and 1960's than it is today.

Stop accepting lies as facts.

CENSORED! How Online Media Companies Are Suppressing Conservative Speech
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/ashley-rae-goldenberg/2018/04/16/censored-how-online-media-companies-are-suppressing

Of course you do.. Because the tools of research are controlled by the Left...

Just another way that Left Wing group think is bad for this country...

A source with knowledge of his testimony confirmed to Fox News that Moffa said FBI personnel would use media reports based on information they leaked to justify applications for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/28/fbi-agent-says-bureau-leaked-stories-then-used-them-to-get-fisa-warrants.html

Yea.. We can trust Odumbo's FBI stooges.... :^/

By omission or commission, you said that the economy would implode, the market would be decimated and President Trump would destroy the country...

And NONE of that has happened..

The economy is strong and getting stronger...

You were WRONG..

And you can't admit you were wrong...

So you hide behind this lame "I never said any of that" bullshit that we BOTH know is bullshit..

But don't worry.. I predicted you were one of the one's who couldn't let go of yer Party slavery and give credit where credit is due..

You HHPTDS is still intact.. :D

But you are an admitted NeverTrumper who would NEVER concede that Trump has done good, even if the FACTS prove it..

Ergo, you simply cannot be believed..

You copy and paste one liners from web sites dedicated to telling you what you want to hear with no links or in depth analysis.

No, I paste FACTS...

Black unemployment is THE LOWEST it's been in history..

That's a FACT.. If it wasn't, your vaunted skills should allow you to disprove it easily..

But you can't...

Hispanic unemployment is THE LOWEST it's been in history... That's a fact..

Can you disprove that?? No you can't..

CEOs are marveling at how awesome the economy is for Americans..

FACT...

Jobless claims drop to 240,000 - hottest streak in 43 years

Can you disprove this fact?? No you cannot..

Is everything perfect?? Of course not..

But things are a LOT better than you will admit..

And THAT is why you lose every argument and debate..

You know, some real research. Let's see if you can actually understand what facts are, instead of random talking points that you happen to like so brand as "facts".

And I want links to quotes, not your version of what you want me to have said.