<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alabama&#039;s Stunning Upset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [465] -- And The Horse You Rode In On!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112358</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [465] -- And The Horse You Rode In On!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 02:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112358</guid>
		<description>[...] Alabama&#8217;s Stunning Upset [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alabama&#8217;s Stunning Upset [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112262</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112262</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all also need to keep in mind one salient point.

Doug Jones is a Democrat in the reddest of red states...

If he wants even the SLIGHTEST chance of keeping his seat, he is going to have to work with Republicans more than Democrats...

You see, this is EXACTLY ya&#039;all&#039;s issue.. You simply CAN&#039;T see past the -D.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all also need to keep in mind one salient point.</p>
<p>Doug Jones is a Democrat in the reddest of red states...</p>
<p>If he wants even the SLIGHTEST chance of keeping his seat, he is going to have to work with Republicans more than Democrats...</p>
<p>You see, this is EXACTLY ya'all's issue.. You simply CAN'T see past the -D.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112258</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112258</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Go ahead and just admit it. Christmas came early for the Democrats. But it&#039;s only one seat, so maybe 2018 won&#039;t be a Democratic wave.

How&#039;s that for reality?&lt;/I&gt;

I don&#039;t see it that way and neither should you..

Put another way..  It would have been a LOT better for the Demcorat Party if Moore had one..

I mean, just by looking at the precedent that Democrats have established..

All it&#039;s going to take to remove Democrats from Congress is 6-8 accusations of sexual impropriety...

Think about it..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Go ahead and just admit it. Christmas came early for the Democrats. But it's only one seat, so maybe 2018 won't be a Democratic wave.</p>
<p>How's that for reality?</i></p>
<p>I don't see it that way and neither should you..</p>
<p>Put another way..  It would have been a LOT better for the Demcorat Party if Moore had one..</p>
<p>I mean, just by looking at the precedent that Democrats have established..</p>
<p>All it's going to take to remove Democrats from Congress is 6-8 accusations of sexual impropriety...</p>
<p>Think about it..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112257</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112257</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Also, with the acronyms, why not revert to the historical norm? It was &quot;BDS&quot; and then &quot;ODS&quot; so now it should be &quot;TDS&quot; right? &quot;President Trump Derangement Syndrome&quot; is too much of a mouthful, and it also is too close to PTSD...&lt;/I&gt;

Ya&#039;all&#039;s hysteria over President Trump is in a class all it&#039;s own..

It&#039;s only fitting that the acronym be special as well. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Also, with the acronyms, why not revert to the historical norm? It was "BDS" and then "ODS" so now it should be "TDS" right? "President Trump Derangement Syndrome" is too much of a mouthful, and it also is too close to PTSD...</i></p>
<p>Ya'all's hysteria over President Trump is in a class all it's own..</p>
<p>It's only fitting that the acronym be special as well. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112251</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 04:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112251</guid>
		<description>Even more to the point: Republicans must be shocked tonight to realize that, coming into a midterms in which their historic dominance of the government is likely to erode, the President and head of their party has no coattails at all. So far, no candidate that he endorsed has won. All year. That&#039;s sobering when you think that endorsements and appearances are all that a president can do during midterm seasons.

It wouldn&#039;t be the first time that a party shunned its titular leader at midterms time. It seems to be a trend, actually, as both Bush and Obama had their turns being &#039;uninvited&#039; by nervous candidates during midterms season for various reasons.

But it also means that Republicans probably don&#039;t need to fear Trump and his evil id, Bannon as much politically as they&#039;d expected. Bannon&#039;s threat to primary every moderate Republican in sight is less of a worry after the fiasco in Alabama, and the most often heard phrase about Bannon being heard tonight is &quot;overrated&quot;.  If that continues, it&#039;s going to change the way that Republicans run their campaigns next year, and perhaps even which Republicans run next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even more to the point: Republicans must be shocked tonight to realize that, coming into a midterms in which their historic dominance of the government is likely to erode, the President and head of their party has no coattails at all. So far, no candidate that he endorsed has won. All year. That's sobering when you think that endorsements and appearances are all that a president can do during midterm seasons.</p>
<p>It wouldn't be the first time that a party shunned its titular leader at midterms time. It seems to be a trend, actually, as both Bush and Obama had their turns being 'uninvited' by nervous candidates during midterms season for various reasons.</p>
<p>But it also means that Republicans probably don't need to fear Trump and his evil id, Bannon as much politically as they'd expected. Bannon's threat to primary every moderate Republican in sight is less of a worry after the fiasco in Alabama, and the most often heard phrase about Bannon being heard tonight is "overrated".  If that continues, it's going to change the way that Republicans run their campaigns next year, and perhaps even which Republicans run next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112245</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 02:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112245</guid>
		<description>Maybe if Moore hadn&#039;t thought that he could use the &quot;Trump defense&quot; (accusing all of his accusers of lying) he might have fared better. While it seemed to keep willingly blind and deaf partisans in his camp, for others it strained his credibility too far, even for Alabamans (Alabamians?).

We&#039;ve seen this before: only Trump can wear the Trump armor. For some reason, his peculiar combination of ignorance and attitude shield him from things that would end the careers of other men.

But as Neil&#039;s Agincourt example demonstrates, even the best armor can be pierced eventually, or even become a hindrance when the shit gets sufficiently deep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if Moore hadn't thought that he could use the "Trump defense" (accusing all of his accusers of lying) he might have fared better. While it seemed to keep willingly blind and deaf partisans in his camp, for others it strained his credibility too far, even for Alabamans (Alabamians?).</p>
<p>We've seen this before: only Trump can wear the Trump armor. For some reason, his peculiar combination of ignorance and attitude shield him from things that would end the careers of other men.</p>
<p>But as Neil's Agincourt example demonstrates, even the best armor can be pierced eventually, or even become a hindrance when the shit gets sufficiently deep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112241</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112241</guid>
		<description>Balthasar [87] -

Ooooh, forgot about that one -- it seems to come back around repeatedly, you&#039;re right.  Good point.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar [87] -</p>
<p>Ooooh, forgot about that one -- it seems to come back around repeatedly, you're right.  Good point.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112240</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112240</guid>
		<description>Yeah, then there&#039;s &#039;Clinton Derangement Syndrome&#039;, which is a long-lasting, chronic condition with no known cure. It can only be managed.

Warning: could lead to twitter and reddit abuse and possible addiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, then there's 'Clinton Derangement Syndrome', which is a long-lasting, chronic condition with no known cure. It can only be managed.</p>
<p>Warning: could lead to twitter and reddit abuse and possible addiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112239</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112239</guid>
		<description>Michale (clarification) -

I&#039;m not saying don&#039;t use it, please understand, just be consistent with the last two presidents, that&#039;s all.  It&#039;d be easier on the eyes and easier to decipher.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale (clarification) -</p>
<p>I'm not saying don't use it, please understand, just be consistent with the last two presidents, that's all.  It'd be easier on the eyes and easier to decipher.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112238</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112238</guid>
		<description>Michale -

Also, with the acronyms, why not revert to the historical norm?  It was &quot;BDS&quot; and then &quot;ODS&quot; so now it should be &quot;TDS&quot; right?  &quot;President Trump Derangement Syndrome&quot; is too much of a mouthful, and it also is too close to PTSD...

Just a thought..

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale -</p>
<p>Also, with the acronyms, why not revert to the historical norm?  It was "BDS" and then "ODS" so now it should be "TDS" right?  "President Trump Derangement Syndrome" is too much of a mouthful, and it also is too close to PTSD...</p>
<p>Just a thought..</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112237</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112237</guid>
		<description>neilm [40] -

With a two-finger salute, I assume... to show your bow-drawing fingers are intact!

Heh.  Took me forever to figure out the origins of the British two fingers...

neilm [44] -

Yeah, that editorial could blister paint at 50 feet.  And from the normally neutral USA Today, that&#039;s quite a read...

neilm [45] -

For me, it&#039;s not an Authentic Trump Tweet unless there is Random use of Capitalization as well as (bizarre parenthetical asides) and &quot;improper use&quot; of quotes (scare quotes or not, there&#039;s just no rhyme or reason to them).  

&lt;em&gt;That&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; how you spot the genuine article!

Heh.

TheStig [54] -

BWAH hah hah!  Now &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; was funny!

Heh.

TheStig [59] -

&lt;em&gt;&quot;You have to get up pretty early in the morning to be Donald Trump.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

That was pretty funny, too.  I wonder why we&#039;re all in such a good mood?

Heh.

As for that tweet, well, it&#039;s got random caps (General Election) and a bizarre parenthetical, but no random quotes.  Two out of three ain&#039;t bad, I bet it really was Trump.

:-)

Nice use of &quot;mightily&quot; even if completely false, though, you&#039;re right.

Michale [various] -

Go ahead and just admit it.  Christmas came early for the Democrats.  But it&#039;s only one seat, so maybe 2018 won&#039;t be a Democratic wave.  

How&#039;s that for reality?

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neilm [40] -</p>
<p>With a two-finger salute, I assume... to show your bow-drawing fingers are intact!</p>
<p>Heh.  Took me forever to figure out the origins of the British two fingers...</p>
<p>neilm [44] -</p>
<p>Yeah, that editorial could blister paint at 50 feet.  And from the normally neutral USA Today, that's quite a read...</p>
<p>neilm [45] -</p>
<p>For me, it's not an Authentic Trump Tweet unless there is Random use of Capitalization as well as (bizarre parenthetical asides) and "improper use" of quotes (scare quotes or not, there's just no rhyme or reason to them).  </p>
<p><em>That's</em> how you spot the genuine article!</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>TheStig [54] -</p>
<p>BWAH hah hah!  Now <em>that</em> was funny!</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>TheStig [59] -</p>
<p><em>"You have to get up pretty early in the morning to be Donald Trump."</em></p>
<p>That was pretty funny, too.  I wonder why we're all in such a good mood?</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>As for that tweet, well, it's got random caps (General Election) and a bizarre parenthetical, but no random quotes.  Two out of three ain't bad, I bet it really was Trump.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>Nice use of "mightily" even if completely false, though, you're right.</p>
<p>Michale [various] -</p>
<p>Go ahead and just admit it.  Christmas came early for the Democrats.  But it's only one seat, so maybe 2018 won't be a Democratic wave.  </p>
<p>How's that for reality?</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112236</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112236</guid>
		<description>I mean, seriously..  If ya&#039;all stopped with the hysterical PTDS, this place would be a LOT more pleasant...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, seriously..  If ya'all stopped with the hysterical PTDS, this place would be a LOT more pleasant...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112235</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112235</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What Neil means, Michale, is that eventually Mueller will produce a report.&lt;/I&gt;

Then why can&#039;t ya&#039;all shut up until he does??

Then, at least, ya&#039;all will actually have some FACTS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What Neil means, Michale, is that eventually Mueller will produce a report.</i></p>
<p>Then why can't ya'all shut up until he does??</p>
<p>Then, at least, ya'all will actually have some FACTS...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112234</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112234</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;could be just stupidity but nothing illegal (these are not very smart people after all), or it could be something more damaging.&lt;/i&gt;

It is interesting to hear Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace discuss this in relation to their own experiences in the McCain campaign.

Wallace, for instance, says she would have been &#039;surprised&#039; to see any Russians at all anywhere near the campaign.

Schmidt, who was McCain&#039;s campaign manager, says he was never even approached by the Russians, and would have referred any emails like the ones Don Jr. got to the authorities.

Similar things have been said by former staffers in the Bush, Gore, and Romney campaigns.

By comparison, investigators have uncovered at least 31 different contacts and 19 meetings between the Trump campaign and the Russians (most of whom had connections to Russian intelligence).

You&#039;d have to have the intelligence of a basketball not to see the problem with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>could be just stupidity but nothing illegal (these are not very smart people after all), or it could be something more damaging.</i></p>
<p>It is interesting to hear Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace discuss this in relation to their own experiences in the McCain campaign.</p>
<p>Wallace, for instance, says she would have been 'surprised' to see any Russians at all anywhere near the campaign.</p>
<p>Schmidt, who was McCain's campaign manager, says he was never even approached by the Russians, and would have referred any emails like the ones Don Jr. got to the authorities.</p>
<p>Similar things have been said by former staffers in the Bush, Gore, and Romney campaigns.</p>
<p>By comparison, investigators have uncovered at least 31 different contacts and 19 meetings between the Trump campaign and the Russians (most of whom had connections to Russian intelligence).</p>
<p>You'd have to have the intelligence of a basketball not to see the problem with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112233</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112233</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Good to find out about how the OMG affects the PDQ, but you need to consider the ASAP and its effect on the WTFLGBT and the XYZ.&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry - too many years on Wall St.

AML - anti-money laundering
DB - Deutsche Bank
NYC (you probably knew) - New York City</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Good to find out about how the OMG affects the PDQ, but you need to consider the ASAP and its effect on the WTFLGBT and the XYZ.</i></p>
<p>Sorry - too many years on Wall St.</p>
<p>AML - anti-money laundering<br />
DB - Deutsche Bank<br />
NYC (you probably knew) - New York City</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. R. Stucki</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112232</link>
		<dc:creator>C. R. Stucki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112232</guid>
		<description>neilm

Good to find out about how the OMG affects the PDQ, but you need to consider the ASAP and its effect on the WTFLGBT and the XYZ.

You (and others) could give us oldtimers a break on the code lingo, often we don&#039;t know what the hell we&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neilm</p>
<p>Good to find out about how the OMG affects the PDQ, but you need to consider the ASAP and its effect on the WTFLGBT and the XYZ.</p>
<p>You (and others) could give us oldtimers a break on the code lingo, often we don't know what the hell we're talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112231</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112231</guid>
		<description>But there is already evidence of collusion and coverups appearing - emails from Russians to Don Jr. - meetings with Russians that everybody forgot about, etc.

Mueller is just going to put all the pieces together into a picture - could be just stupidity but nothing illegal (these are not very smart people after all), or it could be something more damaging.

If you want to see how the picture looks at the moment I strongly recommend &quot;Collusion&quot; by Luke Harding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there is already evidence of collusion and coverups appearing - emails from Russians to Don Jr. - meetings with Russians that everybody forgot about, etc.</p>
<p>Mueller is just going to put all the pieces together into a picture - could be just stupidity but nothing illegal (these are not very smart people after all), or it could be something more damaging.</p>
<p>If you want to see how the picture looks at the moment I strongly recommend "Collusion" by Luke Harding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112230</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112230</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming Mueller is counting on three scenarios:

1. He is in place throughout and 45 can&#039;t pardon everybody involved.

2. He is fired and somebody else needs to take it over - possible after the 2018 elections

3. 45 gets away with pardoning everybody, so he hits them with state charges

Given that we are moving into AML territory 45 and the family really need to worry about the NY state charges that can be brought since a lot of the DB activity will be thru NYC locations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm assuming Mueller is counting on three scenarios:</p>
<p>1. He is in place throughout and 45 can't pardon everybody involved.</p>
<p>2. He is fired and somebody else needs to take it over - possible after the 2018 elections</p>
<p>3. 45 gets away with pardoning everybody, so he hits them with state charges</p>
<p>Given that we are moving into AML territory 45 and the family really need to worry about the NY state charges that can be brought since a lot of the DB activity will be thru NYC locations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112229</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112229</guid>
		<description>What Neil means, Michale, is that eventually Mueller will produce a report. Mueller&#039;s been criticized for indicting witnesses as he goes along, but I think that he&#039;s doing that because he wants their testimony under oath to be in the public record, y&#039;know, just because Trump has that famous catch phrase. 

Mueller is in this respect like a quarterback under pressure, moving the ball on the ground, but keeping open the option for a lateral pass, perhaps to the NY Atty General, in case his pocket starts to collapse.

My guess is that we&#039;ll see several more indictments before the Mueller Report is presented to the public. That way, firing him, or greeting his report with a Bronx cheer, won&#039;t halt the investigation - it&#039;d just move it to another spot downfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Neil means, Michale, is that eventually Mueller will produce a report. Mueller's been criticized for indicting witnesses as he goes along, but I think that he's doing that because he wants their testimony under oath to be in the public record, y'know, just because Trump has that famous catch phrase. </p>
<p>Mueller is in this respect like a quarterback under pressure, moving the ball on the ground, but keeping open the option for a lateral pass, perhaps to the NY Atty General, in case his pocket starts to collapse.</p>
<p>My guess is that we'll see several more indictments before the Mueller Report is presented to the public. That way, firing him, or greeting his report with a Bronx cheer, won't halt the investigation - it'd just move it to another spot downfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112228</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112228</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The real evidence of collusion is coming out.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, you keep saying that..

And yet, there are NO FACTS that prove what you say is &quot;true&quot;...

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The real evidence of collusion is coming out.</i></p>
<p>Yea, you keep saying that..</p>
<p>And yet, there are NO FACTS that prove what you say is "true"...</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112227</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112227</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That&#039;s the point you just refuse to get...&lt;/i&gt;

Well since there is a Republican President, a Republican House, a Republican Senate, a Republican Governor in Alabama, a Republican State House in Alabama, and a Republican State Senate in Alabama they can use the evidence you can&#039;t point out to appoint an investigator into the Putin/Alabama links.

Sadly for you, the only evidence is the tweet monitoring of known Russian handles that were tweeting links to Roy Moore&#039;s web site.

I know, you lost again. Your infallible President lost again. The real evidence of collusion is coming out. You can&#039;t handle the truth. We understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That's the point you just refuse to get...</i></p>
<p>Well since there is a Republican President, a Republican House, a Republican Senate, a Republican Governor in Alabama, a Republican State House in Alabama, and a Republican State Senate in Alabama they can use the evidence you can't point out to appoint an investigator into the Putin/Alabama links.</p>
<p>Sadly for you, the only evidence is the tweet monitoring of known Russian handles that were tweeting links to Roy Moore's web site.</p>
<p>I know, you lost again. Your infallible President lost again. The real evidence of collusion is coming out. You can't handle the truth. We understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112225</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112225</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;- a thing that has no basis in reality
example use: &quot;the most common Michale fact is that everybody else is partisan and he is the only independent&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

The &quot;facts&quot; that support Jones/Putin collusion are as viable and as &quot;factual&quot; as the facts that support Trump/Putin collusion..

That&#039;s the point you just refuse to get...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>- a thing that has no basis in reality<br />
example use: "the most common Michale fact is that everybody else is partisan and he is the only independent"</i></p>
<p>The "facts" that support Jones/Putin collusion are as viable and as "factual" as the facts that support Trump/Putin collusion..</p>
<p>That's the point you just refuse to get...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112224</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112224</guid>
		<description>This is pretty funny:

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trumps-slurred-speech-tied-to-low-battery-in-putins-remote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty funny:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trumps-slurred-speech-tied-to-low-battery-in-putins-remote" rel="nofollow">https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trumps-slurred-speech-tied-to-low-battery-in-putins-remote</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112223</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112223</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Jones colluded with Putin, as the facts show&lt;/i&gt;

Definition: &lt;b&gt;Michale fact&lt;/b&gt;
noun
plural noun: &lt;i&gt;steaming piles of BS&lt;/i&gt;

-  a thing that has no basis in reality
  example use: &quot;the most common Michale fact is that everybody else is partisan and he is the only independent&quot;

Antonym: reality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Jones colluded with Putin, as the facts show</i></p>
<p>Definition: <b>Michale fact</b><br />
noun<br />
plural noun: <i>steaming piles of BS</i></p>
<p>-  a thing that has no basis in reality<br />
  example use: "the most common Michale fact is that everybody else is partisan and he is the only independent"</p>
<p>Antonym: reality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112222</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112222</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If it wasn&#039;t for the dire consequences it would be entertaining to observe the arguments by those that want a tombstone versus those that want a monument.&lt;/i&gt;

You know a lot of poor and hard done to people motivated themselves in a state where they had lost 25 years in a row to believe in Doug Jones, and all you can do is grind your ax and claim that all he cares about is rich people and campaign contributions.

Show some decency Don.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If it wasn't for the dire consequences it would be entertaining to observe the arguments by those that want a tombstone versus those that want a monument.</i></p>
<p>You know a lot of poor and hard done to people motivated themselves in a state where they had lost 25 years in a row to believe in Doug Jones, and all you can do is grind your ax and claim that all he cares about is rich people and campaign contributions.</p>
<p>Show some decency Don.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112220</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112220</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;... and one of the three Senate seats they need to flip it to &quot;D&quot; - one that they never expected and that isn&#039;t up util 2020.&lt;/I&gt;

No, they don&#039;t..  Not for months yet.. And when it&#039;s discovered that Jones colluded with Putin, as the facts show, then the seat will revert to Moore...

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>... and one of the three Senate seats they need to flip it to "D" - one that they never expected and that isn't up util 2020.</i></p>
<p>No, they don't..  Not for months yet.. And when it's discovered that Jones colluded with Putin, as the facts show, then the seat will revert to Moore...</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112219</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112219</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Now they got nothing but their dicks in their hands.. :D&lt;/i&gt;

...  and one of the three Senate seats they need to flip it to &quot;D&quot; - one that they never expected and that isn&#039;t up util 2020.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now they got nothing but their dicks in their hands.. :D</i></p>
<p>...  and one of the three Senate seats they need to flip it to "D" - one that they never expected and that isn't up util 2020.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112218</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112218</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny..  Moore winning would have actually been BETTER for the Dims in 2018....

Now they got nothing but their dicks in their hands..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's funny..  Moore winning would have actually been BETTER for the Dims in 2018....</p>
<p>Now they got nothing but their dicks in their hands..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112217</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112217</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But let&#039;s face it. You thought Moore was going to win too.. That&#039;s why you didn&#039;t want to make a prediction. :D&lt;/i&gt;

I did make a prediction, and I was within 2% points for both candidates :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But let's face it. You thought Moore was going to win too.. That's why you didn't want to make a prediction. :D</i></p>
<p>I did make a prediction, and I was within 2% points for both candidates :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112216</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112216</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;He&#039;d have blamed &quot;Fake News&quot; and probably worked in some &quot;collusion&quot; angle between the &quot;loser media&quot; and the Democrats.&lt;/I&gt;

There was collusion between Jones and Putin..

This is fact...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He'd have blamed "Fake News" and probably worked in some "collusion" angle between the "loser media" and the Democrats.</i></p>
<p>There was collusion between Jones and Putin..</p>
<p>This is fact...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112215</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112215</guid>
		<description>Yes there is..  :D

But let&#039;s face it. You thought Moore was going to win too.. That&#039;s why you didn&#039;t want to make a prediction.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes there is..  :D</p>
<p>But let's face it. You thought Moore was going to win too.. That's why you didn't want to make a prediction.  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112214</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112214</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Michale wrote:

Moore will win Alabama and the Jags will win the Super Bowl.. :D&lt;/i&gt;

Well there is still hope for the Jags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Michale wrote:</p>
<p>Moore will win Alabama and the Jags will win the Super Bowl.. :D</i></p>
<p>Well there is still hope for the Jags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112213</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112213</guid>
		<description>TS [59] I agree - these are pale imitations - no way would he have reminded everybody he lost twice in Alabama by bringing up Luther Strange - first in the primary then in the election.

He&#039;d have blamed &quot;Fake News&quot; and probably worked in some &quot;collusion&quot; angle between the &quot;loser media&quot; and the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TS [59] I agree - these are pale imitations - no way would he have reminded everybody he lost twice in Alabama by bringing up Luther Strange - first in the primary then in the election.</p>
<p>He'd have blamed "Fake News" and probably worked in some "collusion" angle between the "loser media" and the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112212</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112212</guid>
		<description>Morning neilm.  Another early riser.

RE Trump ghost writers: a reworked cliche...

&quot;You have to get up pretty early in the morning to be Donald Trump.&quot;

&lt;b&gt;Dec 13, 2017 06:22:04 AM The reason I originally endorsed Luther Strange (and his numbers went up mightily), is that I said Roy Moore will not be able to win the General Election. I was right! Roy worked hard but the deck was stacked against him!&lt;/b&gt; 

Nice use of &quot;mightily&quot; and &quot;I was right!&quot; - but where is the bile and inflated sense of entitlement?  I rate this one dubious....but a rich Saudi Prince just might pay to much for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morning neilm.  Another early riser.</p>
<p>RE Trump ghost writers: a reworked cliche...</p>
<p>"You have to get up pretty early in the morning to be Donald Trump."</p>
<p><b>Dec 13, 2017 06:22:04 AM The reason I originally endorsed Luther Strange (and his numbers went up mightily), is that I said Roy Moore will not be able to win the General Election. I was right! Roy worked hard but the deck was stacked against him!</b> </p>
<p>Nice use of "mightily" and "I was right!" - but where is the bile and inflated sense of entitlement?  I rate this one dubious....but a rich Saudi Prince just might pay to much for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112211</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112211</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I mean, they ran the perfect candidate.&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly..

It&#039;s the candidate that lost the race..  There is absolutely no meaning in Jones&#039; win beyond the fact that Moore was a crappy candidate...

Much like ya&#039;all claimed when Scott Brown won MASS... &lt;B&gt;&quot;Nothing to see here.  Coakley was a crappy candidate.. That&#039;s it&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

I am glad you and I can agree on this..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I mean, they ran the perfect candidate.</i></p>
<p>Exactly..</p>
<p>It's the candidate that lost the race..  There is absolutely no meaning in Jones' win beyond the fact that Moore was a crappy candidate...</p>
<p>Much like ya'all claimed when Scott Brown won MASS... <b>"Nothing to see here.  Coakley was a crappy candidate.. That's it"</b></p>
<p>I am glad you and I can agree on this..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112210</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112210</guid>
		<description>TS [54] Now that was funny :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TS [54] Now that was funny :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112209</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112209</guid>
		<description>45&#039;s supporters are so tired of winning they decided to lose to see what it was like again.

Only explanation.

I mean, they ran the perfect candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>45's supporters are so tired of winning they decided to lose to see what it was like again.</p>
<p>Only explanation.</p>
<p>I mean, they ran the perfect candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112208</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112208</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually kind of hilarious when ya think about it.

Hysterical Democrats are cheering the election of an old white guy, while spending the last few years castigating and demonizing old white guys...

Once again..  It&#039;s ALL about the -D after the person&#039;s name...  Nothing else matters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's actually kind of hilarious when ya think about it.</p>
<p>Hysterical Democrats are cheering the election of an old white guy, while spending the last few years castigating and demonizing old white guys...</p>
<p>Once again..  It's ALL about the -D after the person's name...  Nothing else matters...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112206</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112206</guid>
		<description>Balthasar -49

Even Leo da Vinci didn&#039;t do all the work on his famous masterpieces - he used apprentices too!

I&#039;m coining the term &quot;Designated Shitter&quot; to describe a ghost writer filling in @realdonaldtrump.  Which, in all honesty, should be rebranded @realdonaldtrumpwithaddedfillers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar -49</p>
<p>Even Leo da Vinci didn't do all the work on his famous masterpieces - he used apprentices too!</p>
<p>I'm coining the term "Designated Shitter" to describe a ghost writer filling in @realdonaldtrump.  Which, in all honesty, should be rebranded @realdonaldtrumpwithaddedfillers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112205</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112205</guid>
		<description>For the hysterical Dumbocrats who think that the Alabama win actually means anything for the 2018 elections??

Ya&#039;all are deluding yourselves...

This is the epitome of an outlier...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the hysterical Dumbocrats who think that the Alabama win actually means anything for the 2018 elections??</p>
<p>Ya'all are deluding yourselves...</p>
<p>This is the epitome of an outlier...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112204</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112204</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Why? Moore lost. Sounds like a good day for Franken.&lt;/I&gt;

Because the reason Franken (and Conyers) were forced out is so Dumbocrats can at least have SOME semblance of the moral high ground..

With Moore not in the Senate, there was no political reason why Franken and Conyers had to go..

You yourself conceded that politics was the reason for the ouster...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why? Moore lost. Sounds like a good day for Franken.</i></p>
<p>Because the reason Franken (and Conyers) were forced out is so Dumbocrats can at least have SOME semblance of the moral high ground..</p>
<p>With Moore not in the Senate, there was no political reason why Franken and Conyers had to go..</p>
<p>You yourself conceded that politics was the reason for the ouster...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112203</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112203</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I bet Franken and Conyers are fit to be tied right now!&lt;/i&gt;

Why? Moore lost. Sounds like a good day for Franken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I bet Franken and Conyers are fit to be tied right now!</i></p>
<p>Why? Moore lost. Sounds like a good day for Franken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112202</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112202</guid>
		<description>RUSSIAN COLLUSION!!!!

That&#039;s the only reason Jones won!!!

He colluded with Putin!!!!!!  

:D

I bet Franken and Conyers are fit to be tied right now!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RUSSIAN COLLUSION!!!!</p>
<p>That's the only reason Jones won!!!</p>
<p>He colluded with Putin!!!!!!  </p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>I bet Franken and Conyers are fit to be tied right now!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112201</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112201</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Somebody, somewhere, must be running Trump Tweets through style recognition software to spot probable fakes.&lt;/i&gt;

Not really necessary. Now that I&#039;ve caught up on the TV commentary, it appears that we&#039;re not alone - everyone who&#039;s mentioned it has said that it doesn&#039;t read like a real Trump tweet.

I&#039;d guess Dan Scavino.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Somebody, somewhere, must be running Trump Tweets through style recognition software to spot probable fakes.</i></p>
<p>Not really necessary. Now that I've caught up on the TV commentary, it appears that we're not alone - everyone who's mentioned it has said that it doesn't read like a real Trump tweet.</p>
<p>I'd guess Dan Scavino.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112200</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 06:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112200</guid>
		<description>42- Mud plus poor French crowd control.  

43- Trump took the high road.  That is a surprise!

45- I&#039;ve had similar thoughts about possible ghost writing.  Somebody, somewhere, must be running Trump Tweets through style recognition software to spot probable fakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>42- Mud plus poor French crowd control.  </p>
<p>43- Trump took the high road.  That is a surprise!</p>
<p>45- I've had similar thoughts about possible ghost writing.  Somebody, somewhere, must be running Trump Tweets through style recognition software to spot probable fakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112199</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 06:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112199</guid>
		<description>neilm [44-45]: we seem to have had the exact same two thoughts at the same time. In the second instance, I agree: that last Trump tweet tried to, but didn&#039;t read like one of his. Maybe we&#039;ll see in the morning what he really thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neilm [44-45]: we seem to have had the exact same two thoughts at the same time. In the second instance, I agree: that last Trump tweet tried to, but didn't read like one of his. Maybe we'll see in the morning what he really thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112198</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112198</guid>
		<description>P.S.: Speaking of Trump tweets, he&#039;s very fortunate that the shock of the Alabama result will fill airtime that might have otherwise be spent on outrage over Trump calling Kirsten Gillibrand a slut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.: Speaking of Trump tweets, he's very fortunate that the shock of the Alabama result will fill airtime that might have otherwise be spent on outrage over Trump calling Kirsten Gillibrand a slut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112197</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112197</guid>
		<description>That tweet from 45 really looks manufactured for him - it is too articulate and doesn&#039;t have any nasty little barbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That tweet from 45 really looks manufactured for him - it is too articulate and doesn't have any nasty little barbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112196</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112196</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A president who&#039;d all but call a senator a whore is unfit to clean toilets in Obama&#039;s presidential library or to shine George W. Bush&#039;s shoes: Our view&lt;/i&gt;

USA Today Editorial Board

Wow!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/12/trump-lows-ever-hit-rock-bottom-editorials-debates/945947001/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A president who'd all but call a senator a whore is unfit to clean toilets in Obama's presidential library or to shine George W. Bush's shoes: Our view</i></p>
<p>USA Today Editorial Board</p>
<p>Wow!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/12/trump-lows-ever-hit-rock-bottom-editorials-debates/945947001/" rel="nofollow">https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/12/trump-lows-ever-hit-rock-bottom-editorials-debates/945947001/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112195</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112195</guid>
		<description>Stig: Trump &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;already tweeted&lt;/a&gt; congrats to Jones, and mentioned &lt;i&gt;infra&lt;/i&gt; the write-in vote. Shelby will take some shots from the Bannon/Trump folks, I expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stig: Trump <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="nofollow">already tweeted</a> congrats to Jones, and mentioned <i>infra</i> the write-in vote. Shelby will take some shots from the Bannon/Trump folks, I expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112194</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112194</guid>
		<description>Another point that has to be addressed:

Last night my brother &amp; I had a conversation about the MeToo movement and an unexpected side issue: the guys who had completely denied any wrongdoing, and called their accusers liars, had actually fared better than those who tried to apologize and move on. At least that was his perception.

Maybe this Moore win will stick a bit of a pin in that. Had Moore won tonight, the conventional wisdom might have been that republicans, and Trump voters specifically, are simply unmoved by these sorts of accusations. Maybe the particular things that Moore were accused of hit a nerve in the electorate, and certainly Moore&#039;s conduct before those accusations were ever made also played a role, but it is evident now that those accusations had a significant effect on tonight&#039;s election results.

That will encourage some to ratchet up the pressure for Trump to answer to his accusers. And what an irony it would be for that, rather than traitorous collusion with an international adversary, to be the thing that ends up hurting Trump politically the most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another point that has to be addressed:</p>
<p>Last night my brother &amp; I had a conversation about the MeToo movement and an unexpected side issue: the guys who had completely denied any wrongdoing, and called their accusers liars, had actually fared better than those who tried to apologize and move on. At least that was his perception.</p>
<p>Maybe this Moore win will stick a bit of a pin in that. Had Moore won tonight, the conventional wisdom might have been that republicans, and Trump voters specifically, are simply unmoved by these sorts of accusations. Maybe the particular things that Moore were accused of hit a nerve in the electorate, and certainly Moore's conduct before those accusations were ever made also played a role, but it is evident now that those accusations had a significant effect on tonight's election results.</p>
<p>That will encourage some to ratchet up the pressure for Trump to answer to his accusers. And what an irony it would be for that, rather than traitorous collusion with an international adversary, to be the thing that ends up hurting Trump politically the most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112193</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112193</guid>
		<description>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11948049/The-Battle-of-Agincourt-why-should-we-remember-it.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11948049/The-Battle-of-Agincourt-why-should-we-remember-it.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11948049/The-Battle-of-Agincourt-why-should-we-remember-it.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112192</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112192</guid>
		<description>As we say in Britain at these times, &quot;Remember Agincourt&quot;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we say in Britain at these times, "Remember Agincourt"</p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112191</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112191</guid>
		<description>Defecting Republican write-ins did Moore in. This not the first time somebody has been knocked senseless by a H.S. yearbook.  Those things are heavy, especially the vintage ones.  What a pleasant surprise.  Can&#039;t wait to read the Trump Tweets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defecting Republican write-ins did Moore in. This not the first time somebody has been knocked senseless by a H.S. yearbook.  Those things are heavy, especially the vintage ones.  What a pleasant surprise.  Can't wait to read the Trump Tweets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112190</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 05:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112190</guid>
		<description>Moore didn&#039;t have the guts to stand up and take it like a man. He&#039;s going to either wimp out tomorrow when the cameras aren&#039;t on him, or pointlessly battle until nobody is paying attention any longer and it just gets called for Jones.

I should not have expected anything more from this horrible little man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore didn't have the guts to stand up and take it like a man. He's going to either wimp out tomorrow when the cameras aren't on him, or pointlessly battle until nobody is paying attention any longer and it just gets called for Jones.</p>
<p>I should not have expected anything more from this horrible little man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112189</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112189</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If enough voters turn out, then anything is possible.&lt;/i&gt;

Word! But Paula also adds a important point:

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s not just grassroots enthusiasm, its SMART grassroots activism.&lt;/i&gt;

Exactly, for instance the &lt;i&gt;Indivisible&lt;/i&gt; movement.

I&#039;m also a great believer in the &quot;50 State strategy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If enough voters turn out, then anything is possible.</i></p>
<p>Word! But Paula also adds a important point:</p>
<p><i>It's not just grassroots enthusiasm, its SMART grassroots activism.</i></p>
<p>Exactly, for instance the <i>Indivisible</i> movement.</p>
<p>I'm also a great believer in the "50 State strategy".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112188</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112188</guid>
		<description>Dems rejected DT from day one. What&#039;s amazing is how high the intensity remains. The resistance has resisted and resisted and resisted. This win will fuel yet more resistance -- it&#039;s HUGE in that sense.  

And, as in Virginia, it seems the Dem GOTV/ground games are improving. Less money on TV ads, more money on other efforts. Lots of help from out-of-state -- phone banking, postcards and donations. Among the spontaneous uprisings post 2016 were groups offering ways for people in blue states to help fellow-dems in red states. Those efforts seem to be paying off. 

Very encouraging. It&#039;s not just grassroots enthusiasm, its SMART grassroots activism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dems rejected DT from day one. What's amazing is how high the intensity remains. The resistance has resisted and resisted and resisted. This win will fuel yet more resistance -- it's HUGE in that sense.  </p>
<p>And, as in Virginia, it seems the Dem GOTV/ground games are improving. Less money on TV ads, more money on other efforts. Lots of help from out-of-state -- phone banking, postcards and donations. Among the spontaneous uprisings post 2016 were groups offering ways for people in blue states to help fellow-dems in red states. Those efforts seem to be paying off. </p>
<p>Very encouraging. It's not just grassroots enthusiasm, its SMART grassroots activism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112187</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112187</guid>
		<description>PROGRAM NOTE:

An actual column has now been posted here.  You may have to get your browser to refresh or reload to see it.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PROGRAM NOTE:</p>
<p>An actual column has now been posted here.  You may have to get your browser to refresh or reload to see it.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112186</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112186</guid>
		<description>Balthy
29

&lt;i&gt;Awful for Trump: two endorsements in a row go down in flames in a deep red state. Ouch. &lt;/i&gt;

It doesn&#039;t get Moore Strange than that, now does it? Who will Trump blame for all this &quot;winning&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthy<br />
29</p>
<p><i>Awful for Trump: two endorsements in a row go down in flames in a deep red state. Ouch. </i></p>
<p>It doesn't get Moore Strange than that, now does it? Who will Trump blame for all this "winning"?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112185</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112185</guid>
		<description>Kick [28]: if the reporting I&#039;ve heard tonight is right, that turnout number might be even higher.

A good example of what inroads a centrist candidate and vigorous GOTV effort could accomplish in even Red States..

..and what a disaster Bannon&#039;s &quot;let&#039;s run a nut&quot; strategy can result in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick [28]: if the reporting I've heard tonight is right, that turnout number might be even higher.</p>
<p>A good example of what inroads a centrist candidate and vigorous GOTV effort could accomplish in even Red States..</p>
<p>..and what a disaster Bannon's "let's run a nut" strategy can result in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bclancy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112184</link>
		<dc:creator>Bclancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112184</guid>
		<description>“Once again, I think it&#039;s so cute that ya&#039;all pay attention to polls... :D

It&#039;s abundantly clear that the ONLY &quot;poll&quot; that Trump supporters use is the one at the ballot box..

So, all the polls that ya&#039;all love to quote ONLY reflect the choices of those who don&#039;t support President Trump..”

-Michale

Prescient as always ;) Though to be fair, I didn’t think Jones would win. I’m pretty sure most people here didn’t either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Once again, I think it's so cute that ya'all pay attention to polls... :D</p>
<p>It's abundantly clear that the ONLY "poll" that Trump supporters use is the one at the ballot box..</p>
<p>So, all the polls that ya'all love to quote ONLY reflect the choices of those who don't support President Trump..”</p>
<p>-Michale</p>
<p>Prescient as always ;) Though to be fair, I didn’t think Jones would win. I’m pretty sure most people here didn’t either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112183</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112183</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you ever get tired of being WRONG Michale? 

Say it together with me: SENATOR DOUG JONES

Not only did the Democrat win, a PRO CHOICE Democrat won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't you ever get tired of being WRONG Michale? </p>
<p>Say it together with me: SENATOR DOUG JONES</p>
<p>Not only did the Democrat win, a PRO CHOICE Democrat won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112182</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112182</guid>
		<description>All Hail Alabama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Hail Alabama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112181</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112181</guid>
		<description>Awful for Trump: two endorsements in a row go down in flames in a deep red state. Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awful for Trump: two endorsements in a row go down in flames in a deep red state. Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112180</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112180</guid>
		<description>Balthy 
22

&lt;i&gt;Either way, write-in (a.k.a. unhappy Republican) votes will probably exceed the margin of victory.&lt;/i&gt;

Yep. Also, about a quarter of Alabama is African American, and there was early exit polling showing that around 30% of them voted in this special election... if accurate polling data, this is much higher than normal demographics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthy<br />
22</p>
<p><i>Either way, write-in (a.k.a. unhappy Republican) votes will probably exceed the margin of victory.</i></p>
<p>Yep. Also, about a quarter of Alabama is African American, and there was early exit polling showing that around 30% of them voted in this special election... if accurate polling data, this is much higher than normal demographics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112179</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112179</guid>
		<description>Senate Leadership committee (aka McConnell) reported to be already blaming Bannon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Leadership committee (aka McConnell) reported to be already blaming Bannon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112178</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112178</guid>
		<description>Well it is being called for Jones. I’m surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it is being called for Jones. I’m surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112177</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112177</guid>
		<description>Montgomery and Mobile counties also... huge outstanding votes remaining in these big blue strongholds. 

It&#039;s basically over for Moore when you check the remaining outstanding votes in Jefferson, Madison, Mobile, and Montgomery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montgomery and Mobile counties also... huge outstanding votes remaining in these big blue strongholds. </p>
<p>It's basically over for Moore when you check the remaining outstanding votes in Jefferson, Madison, Mobile, and Montgomery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112176</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112176</guid>
		<description>Balthasar -

That is an excellent point!

Good to see others here...

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar -</p>
<p>That is an excellent point!</p>
<p>Good to see others here...</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112175</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112175</guid>
		<description>Washington Post calls it for Jones!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post calls it for Jones!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112174</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112174</guid>
		<description>Either way, write-in (a.k.a. unhappy Republican) votes will probably exceed the margin of victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way, write-in (a.k.a. unhappy Republican) votes will probably exceed the margin of victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112173</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112173</guid>
		<description>With 89% in, Jones takes the lead!

Up 10K votes, 49.6 to 48.8.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 89% in, Jones takes the lead!</p>
<p>Up 10K votes, 49.6 to 48.8.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112172</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112172</guid>
		<description>Very close. The story here, I think, is that Trump was unable to turn out his faithful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very close. The story here, I think, is that Trump was unable to turn out his faithful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112171</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112171</guid>
		<description>Watch Madison and Jefferson counties. Jones will overtake Moore in 3, 2, 1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch Madison and Jefferson counties. Jones will overtake Moore in 3, 2, 1...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112170</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112170</guid>
		<description>Hey there, CW and everybody (anybody?).

Moore is actually getting his clock cleaned in Jefferson County, and the 20% outstanding votes are in largely large blue counties. This is going to be a close one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, CW and everybody (anybody?).</p>
<p>Moore is actually getting his clock cleaned in Jefferson County, and the 20% outstanding votes are in largely large blue counties. This is going to be a close one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112169</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112169</guid>
		<description>Moore&#039;s lead slips to 133 votes!  A lead change could be imminient...

85% in...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore's lead slips to 133 votes!  A lead change could be imminient...</p>
<p>85% in...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112168</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 03:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112168</guid>
		<description>Moore only up by 6K... looks like a photo finish, folks!

With 81% in, his lead is now 0.7%.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore only up by 6K... looks like a photo finish, folks!</p>
<p>With 81% in, his lead is now 0.7%.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112167</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112167</guid>
		<description>With 75% in, Moore&#039;s lead continues to slip.  Now only 25K votes.  down to 51-48 lead...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 75% in, Moore's lead continues to slip.  Now only 25K votes.  down to 51-48 lead...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112166</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112166</guid>
		<description>OK, Moore&#039;s lead in the last few minutes slipped from 60K to 38K.  It&#039;s not over yet, that&#039;s for sure.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Moore's lead in the last few minutes slipped from 60K to 38K.  It's not over yet, that's for sure.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112165</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112165</guid>
		<description>Moore up 55K votes, 53-45, with 65% in.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore up 55K votes, 53-45, with 65% in.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112164</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112164</guid>
		<description>Moore now up 47K votes.  With about 60% in.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore now up 47K votes.  With about 60% in.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112163</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112163</guid>
		<description>Moore takes a 37K vote lead, 52-46.  But there&#039;s a lot of urban votes left to count, and not so many rural ones...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore takes a 37K vote lead, 52-46.  But there's a lot of urban votes left to count, and not so many rural ones...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112162</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112162</guid>
		<description>Early signs may be showing Moore counties&#039; turnout is down.  But few counties have fully reported yet, so it&#039;s too early to tell.

Moore 52, Jones 47, with over 40% in...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early signs may be showing Moore counties' turnout is down.  But few counties have fully reported yet, so it's too early to tell.</p>
<p>Moore 52, Jones 47, with over 40% in...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112161</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112161</guid>
		<description>OK, just took a break to watch news.  With over 30% in, Moore is leading by 19K votes.  52-47, with 1.3% write-ins.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, just took a break to watch news.  With over 30% in, Moore is leading by 19K votes.  52-47, with 1.3% write-ins.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112160</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112160</guid>
		<description>Boy, this is a real seesaw of a race.  Moore was up by 11K votes, but in the next update, was only up by 2K.  12% reporting so far.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, this is a real seesaw of a race.  Moore was up by 11K votes, but in the next update, was only up by 2K.  12% reporting so far.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112159</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112159</guid>
		<description>OK, now the data is streaming in.  FiveThirtyEight seems to have the fastest-posting site for new data...

Moore up by 6K votes, 53-46.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, now the data is streaming in.  FiveThirtyEight seems to have the fastest-posting site for new data...</p>
<p>Moore up by 6K votes, 53-46.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112158</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112158</guid>
		<description>And with 4%, Moore catches up.  Now almost a dead heat.  Things won&#039;t settle down until at least 10-20% of vote is in, most likely.  At this stage, it&#039;s all about which precincts report first, really, which can sway the totals.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And with 4%, Moore catches up.  Now almost a dead heat.  Things won't settle down until at least 10-20% of vote is in, most likely.  At this stage, it's all about which precincts report first, really, which can sway the totals.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112157</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112157</guid>
		<description>Write-in votes are above 1.0%.  It&#039;ll be interesting to see if this holds, because most of them are assumably GOP voters who couldn&#039;t bring themselves to vote for Moore...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Write-in votes are above 1.0%.  It'll be interesting to see if this holds, because most of them are assumably GOP voters who couldn't bring themselves to vote for Moore...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112156</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112156</guid>
		<description>Jones seems to be holding a 4K vote lead, with 3% reporting.  Still very early, though...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jones seems to be holding a 4K vote lead, with 3% reporting.  Still very early, though...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112155</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112155</guid>
		<description>OK, finally getting some county-by-county data.  Jones up 64-36, with 0.3% in.  Still a long way to go...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, finally getting some county-by-county data.  Jones up 64-36, with 0.3% in.  Still a long way to go...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112154</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112154</guid>
		<description>Have no idea which votes are coming in first, but Jones is now up 61-39, with ~3K votes in.

This is still less than 1%, but it is fun to watch for the time being...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have no idea which votes are coming in first, but Jones is now up 61-39, with ~3K votes in.</p>
<p>This is still less than 1%, but it is fun to watch for the time being...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/12/12/alabama-votes/#comment-112153</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14868#comment-112153</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;ll get things rolling...

Jones up 56% to 44%

Woo hoo!

Oh, wait, that&#039;s only like 750 votes counted... heh...

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I'll get things rolling...</p>
<p>Jones up 56% to 44%</p>
<p>Woo hoo!</p>
<p>Oh, wait, that's only like 750 votes counted... heh...</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
