<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Distracted Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108551</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108551</guid>
		<description>... but, I&#039;m guessing Michale loves it! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... but, I'm guessing Michale loves it! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108550</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108550</guid>
		<description>Dan,

&lt;I&gt;When I saw this, for a moment I thought it had something to do with the ability to convince others that your factual assertions are correct, by judicious use of the caps lock key.&lt;/I&gt;

Yes, admittedly, my little phrase to encapsulate the Democratic strategy for winning elections needs a bit of work ... or a lot of explanation. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p><i>When I saw this, for a moment I thought it had something to do with the ability to convince others that your factual assertions are correct, by judicious use of the caps lock key.</i></p>
<p>Yes, admittedly, my little phrase to encapsulate the Democratic strategy for winning elections needs a bit of work ... or a lot of explanation. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108549</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108549</guid>
		<description>Russ,

&lt;I&gt;I get it now! &lt;/I&gt;

Excellent! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p><i>I get it now! </i></p>
<p>Excellent! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108541</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108541</guid>
		<description>OK, I signed the Nader petition :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I signed the Nader petition :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108539</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 22:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108539</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Capitalization through fact-based persuasion.&lt;/i&gt;

When I saw this, for a moment I thought it had something to do with the ability to convince others that your factual assertions are correct, by judicious use of the caps lock key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Capitalization through fact-based persuasion.</i></p>
<p>When I saw this, for a moment I thought it had something to do with the ability to convince others that your factual assertions are correct, by judicious use of the caps lock key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108537</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108537</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Just in case you guys were wondering, the flooding never quite got to me, so I&#039;m doing just fine. Lucky I live a bit west of Houston, so I avoided the worst of it.&lt;/i&gt;

Glad to hear it Bleyd. Such a shame for the people caught up in this. I&#039;m hearing that some of the reservoirs are spilling over and that due to land use there might be worse flooding than in the past.

Obviously stopping any loss of life is of paramount importance, but the clean up after this will take years, and given the nature of the Gulf there might be more storms yet this year. If my memory serves me we are only in the early stages of hurricane season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Just in case you guys were wondering, the flooding never quite got to me, so I'm doing just fine. Lucky I live a bit west of Houston, so I avoided the worst of it.</i></p>
<p>Glad to hear it Bleyd. Such a shame for the people caught up in this. I'm hearing that some of the reservoirs are spilling over and that due to land use there might be worse flooding than in the past.</p>
<p>Obviously stopping any loss of life is of paramount importance, but the clean up after this will take years, and given the nature of the Gulf there might be more storms yet this year. If my memory serves me we are only in the early stages of hurricane season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108536</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108536</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What about the &#039;Nader&#039; petition, Neil? That&#039;s the one I signed.&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry - I missed that link - can you please repost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What about the 'Nader' petition, Neil? That's the one I signed.</i></p>
<p>Sorry - I missed that link - can you please repost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleyd</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108535</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108535</guid>
		<description>Just in case you guys were wondering, the flooding never quite got to me, so I&#039;m doing just fine.  Lucky I live a bit west of Houston, so I avoided the worst of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you guys were wondering, the flooding never quite got to me, so I'm doing just fine.  Lucky I live a bit west of Houston, so I avoided the worst of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108534</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108534</guid>
		<description>Liz, 

I get it now!  Thank you for clearing that up for me!  I honestly couldn&#039;t believe that was what you were suggesting, because from reading your comments for over a year that isn&#039;t the type person I think that you are.  

I am sorry for not smiling back at ya.  I&#039;ll work on that and I thank you for reminding me not to take everything so seriously.  ;D

-Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, </p>
<p>I get it now!  Thank you for clearing that up for me!  I honestly couldn't believe that was what you were suggesting, because from reading your comments for over a year that isn't the type person I think that you are.  </p>
<p>I am sorry for not smiling back at ya.  I'll work on that and I thank you for reminding me not to take everything so seriously.  ;D</p>
<p>-Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Powderhound522</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108533</link>
		<dc:creator>Powderhound522</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108533</guid>
		<description>Is it really the case that the White House is dumping bad news during the hurricane? From Vanity Fair&#039;s article on Kushner and Ivanka:

&quot;The couple, somewhat famously, seems to skip town at the precise moment a political catastrophe befalls the White House—letting it be known, for instance, that they were on vacation in Vermont when President Trump delivered his deeply troubling statements about the violence in Charlottesville. (One West Wing aide noted to me that it isn’t that they leave when bad things happen; it’s just that bad things are always happening.)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really the case that the White House is dumping bad news during the hurricane? From Vanity Fair's article on Kushner and Ivanka:</p>
<p>"The couple, somewhat famously, seems to skip town at the precise moment a political catastrophe befalls the White House—letting it be known, for instance, that they were on vacation in Vermont when President Trump delivered his deeply troubling statements about the violence in Charlottesville. (One West Wing aide noted to me that it isn’t that they leave when bad things happen; it’s just that bad things are always happening.)"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108529</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108529</guid>
		<description>What about the &#039;Nader&#039; petition, Neil? That&#039;s the one I signed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the 'Nader' petition, Neil? That's the one I signed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108528</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108528</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As most of my petitions have not gotten many signatures I don&#039;t check for a while to see if anyone has signed to keep from getting discouraged. :-(&lt;/i&gt;

Hi Don:

I did check &quot;One Demand&quot; with the intent to sign up, but the restrictions basically put me in a position of not voting for anybody except maybe fringe candidates.

Perhaps a graded approach might be more effective: i.e. allow &quot;nose holding&quot; in elections, but show people how to find the candidates that are funded by smaller average donation size during primaries and agree (not commit, they might be nutso after all) to prefer them.

I&#039;m very supportive of your mission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As most of my petitions have not gotten many signatures I don't check for a while to see if anyone has signed to keep from getting discouraged. :-(</i></p>
<p>Hi Don:</p>
<p>I did check "One Demand" with the intent to sign up, but the restrictions basically put me in a position of not voting for anybody except maybe fringe candidates.</p>
<p>Perhaps a graded approach might be more effective: i.e. allow "nose holding" in elections, but show people how to find the candidates that are funded by smaller average donation size during primaries and agree (not commit, they might be nutso after all) to prefer them.</p>
<p>I'm very supportive of your mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108526</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108526</guid>
		<description>Have any other Weigantians signed, Don?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have any other Weigantians signed, Don?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108525</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108525</guid>
		<description>By the way, Russ, would it kill ya to smile? I was trying to be funny in some of those comments ... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Russ, would it kill ya to smile? I was trying to be funny in some of those comments ... :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108524</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108524</guid>
		<description>Russ, 

If the truth doesn&#039;t matter to people and they are not open to consistent and persistent fact-based persuasion, then we&#039;re up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

What I am saying if capitalization by fact-based persuasion had been used as the overarching strategy in the last presidential election the outcome might have been much different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, </p>
<p>If the truth doesn't matter to people and they are not open to consistent and persistent fact-based persuasion, then we're up the proverbial creek without a paddle.</p>
<p>What I am saying if capitalization by fact-based persuasion had been used as the overarching strategy in the last presidential election the outcome might have been much different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108523</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108523</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I read all of the comments with this article and I do not get what you are trying to say by that phrase. I apologize if it is obvious to everyone else, but I do not see how you expect Dems to use &quot;fact-based persuasion&quot; when the truth doesn&#039;t matter to people.&lt;/I&gt;

Russ, 

I was just lamenting the fact that Democrats have the right take on most if not all issues as compared with Republicans and that, despite, they can&#039;t seem to win - even against Trump, for God&#039;s sake!!!

I wondered why Democrats can&#039;t seem to capitalize on their being on the right side of issues and persuade at least 60% of American voters that their stand on the issues is the one that deserves votes.

So, &lt;I&gt;capitalization through fact-based persuasion&lt;/I&gt; refers only to how the Democrats should be taking advantage of having the most coherent and intelligent take on the issues by making the best arguments to persuade more voters to vote Democrat.

I hope that clears it up because I&#039;m out of time until much later tonight ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I read all of the comments with this article and I do not get what you are trying to say by that phrase. I apologize if it is obvious to everyone else, but I do not see how you expect Dems to use "fact-based persuasion" when the truth doesn't matter to people.</i></p>
<p>Russ, </p>
<p>I was just lamenting the fact that Democrats have the right take on most if not all issues as compared with Republicans and that, despite, they can't seem to win - even against Trump, for God's sake!!!</p>
<p>I wondered why Democrats can't seem to capitalize on their being on the right side of issues and persuade at least 60% of American voters that their stand on the issues is the one that deserves votes.</p>
<p>So, <i>capitalization through fact-based persuasion</i> refers only to how the Democrats should be taking advantage of having the most coherent and intelligent take on the issues by making the best arguments to persuade more voters to vote Democrat.</p>
<p>I hope that clears it up because I'm out of time until much later tonight ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108522</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108522</guid>
		<description>There is an awful lot Trump Brand collusion:corruption news breaking loose during Harvey.  The Trump admin:organization:family is up to it&#039;s armpits in alligators just now...not quite literally, but close.  Can we really expect Jarhead handle the office while &quot;dad&quot; shambles about in designer waders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an awful lot Trump Brand collusion:corruption news breaking loose during Harvey.  The Trump admin:organization:family is up to it's armpits in alligators just now...not quite literally, but close.  Can we really expect Jarhead handle the office while "dad" shambles about in designer waders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108521</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108521</guid>
		<description>&quot;The media has a literal field day when they get to report on disasters&#039; aftermath. They get to break out the hip-waders, stand on beaches in hurricane-force winds, shove cameras in the faces of devastated crying people, and (nowadays) also get to use drones to get dramatic aerial footage for the viewers at home.&quot;

I don&#039;t think the public is getting representative footage from the electronic media, who are not typically &quot;field people&quot; with the equipment vehicles and training to get into and get around in a disaster area.  The real story has little to do with the beaches or the cities, it&#039;s about the vast inland flood plain, and it&#039;s about rain not wind. The overall situation is still probably getting worse, not better. A lot of residents who find themselves in the flood plains are basically marooned and unaccounted for.  These are the Magic marker people, the ones who were told to write their Social Security numbers on their arms.  Social Media are helpful, but you have to be able charge the devices.

Katrina killed somewhere around 1800 people. I would be surprised if Harvey doesn&#039;t meet or exceed this. 

Trump is supposed to show up in Texas today, and he faces some serious optics challenges.  He isn&#039;t particularly self-aware. If his handlers aren&#039;t on Xanax, they should be.  It&#039;s &quot;no country for old men&quot; used to the lap of luxury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The media has a literal field day when they get to report on disasters' aftermath. They get to break out the hip-waders, stand on beaches in hurricane-force winds, shove cameras in the faces of devastated crying people, and (nowadays) also get to use drones to get dramatic aerial footage for the viewers at home."</p>
<p>I don't think the public is getting representative footage from the electronic media, who are not typically "field people" with the equipment vehicles and training to get into and get around in a disaster area.  The real story has little to do with the beaches or the cities, it's about the vast inland flood plain, and it's about rain not wind. The overall situation is still probably getting worse, not better. A lot of residents who find themselves in the flood plains are basically marooned and unaccounted for.  These are the Magic marker people, the ones who were told to write their Social Security numbers on their arms.  Social Media are helpful, but you have to be able charge the devices.</p>
<p>Katrina killed somewhere around 1800 people. I would be surprised if Harvey doesn't meet or exceed this. </p>
<p>Trump is supposed to show up in Texas today, and he faces some serious optics challenges.  He isn't particularly self-aware. If his handlers aren't on Xanax, they should be.  It's "no country for old men" used to the lap of luxury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108519</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108519</guid>
		<description>I read all of the comments with this article and I do not get what you are trying to say by that phrase.  I apologize if it is obvious to everyone else, but I do not see how you expect Dems to use &quot;fact-based persuasion&quot; when the truth doesn&#039;t matter to people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read all of the comments with this article and I do not get what you are trying to say by that phrase.  I apologize if it is obvious to everyone else, but I do not see how you expect Dems to use "fact-based persuasion" when the truth doesn't matter to people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108518</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108518</guid>
		<description>I used to be non-brief ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be non-brief ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108517</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108517</guid>
		<description>Maybe I should take up twitter? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I should take up twitter? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108516</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108516</guid>
		<description>Actually, &lt;I&gt;&lt;b&gt;distracted reporting&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/b&gt; is a great phrase!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, <i><b>distracted reporting</b></i> is a great phrase!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108515</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108515</guid>
		<description>Oh, well ... what time is it!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, well ... what time is it!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108514</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108514</guid>
		<description>I thought that was such a good phrase, too ... capitalization through fact-based persuasion ... suitable for every conceivable occasion, even ... a motto for the new Democratic strategy for winning, everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that was such a good phrase, too ... capitalization through fact-based persuasion ... suitable for every conceivable occasion, even ... a motto for the new Democratic strategy for winning, everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108513</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108513</guid>
		<description>Not everything has to do with money, you know. Geesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everything has to do with money, you know. Geesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108512</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 06:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108512</guid>
		<description>Russ[7],

What?

Okay, that was funny.

That is what you get when you read a comment or two or three and, then take a quote, of mine, out of context.

Try again! 

Oh, that was really funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ[7],</p>
<p>What?</p>
<p>Okay, that was funny.</p>
<p>That is what you get when you read a comment or two or three and, then take a quote, of mine, out of context.</p>
<p>Try again! </p>
<p>Oh, that was really funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108511</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 05:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108511</guid>
		<description>45 might find another piece of news to hide behind the hurricane is the Q3 growth numbers.

Q1 and Q2 were anemic at best, and the auto industry is hurting in Q3. My mortgage broker called today for a friendly chat and I asked him how business was going and he told me the next recession is starting - it happens with a weakening housing market first.

As usual, forecasting the economy is a fool&#039;s game, however if the Q3 numbers are weak, expect to hear about the &quot;Harvey effect&quot; from the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>45 might find another piece of news to hide behind the hurricane is the Q3 growth numbers.</p>
<p>Q1 and Q2 were anemic at best, and the auto industry is hurting in Q3. My mortgage broker called today for a friendly chat and I asked him how business was going and he told me the next recession is starting - it happens with a weakening housing market first.</p>
<p>As usual, forecasting the economy is a fool's game, however if the Q3 numbers are weak, expect to hear about the "Harvey effect" from the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108510</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 04:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108510</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Capitalization through fact-based persuasion. What is so damned hard about that!?&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;b&gt;&lt;I&gt;Fact-based persuasion???&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/I&gt; Do you mean by threatening to withhold aid?

How, exactly, can they do that without becoming what they hate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Capitalization through fact-based persuasion. What is so damned hard about that!?</i></p>
<p><b><i>Fact-based persuasion???</i></b> Do you mean by threatening to withhold aid?</p>
<p>How, exactly, can they do that without becoming what they hate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108509</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 03:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108509</guid>
		<description>Just another example among countless examples 
of Democrats standing on the right side of history and not capitalizing on it.

Capitalization through fact-based persuasion. What is so damned hard about that!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another example among countless examples<br />
of Democrats standing on the right side of history and not capitalizing on it.</p>
<p>Capitalization through fact-based persuasion. What is so damned hard about that!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108508</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 03:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108508</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also the question of whether all those Texas Republicans who in fact voted against the aid package for the victims in New York and New Jersey of Superstorm Sandy in 2012, realize the irony of their hypocrisy when they start demanding aid for Texas victims of Hurricane Harvey without demanding corresponding offset cuts in Federal spending elsewhere, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's also the question of whether all those Texas Republicans who in fact voted against the aid package for the victims in New York and New Jersey of Superstorm Sandy in 2012, realize the irony of their hypocrisy when they start demanding aid for Texas victims of Hurricane Harvey without demanding corresponding offset cuts in Federal spending elsewhere, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108507</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 03:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108507</guid>
		<description>And that goes for the EPA guy, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that goes for the EPA guy, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108506</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 03:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108506</guid>
		<description>What is Secretary Perry up to, anyway. I&#039;d like a journalist to delve into that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Secretary Perry up to, anyway. I'd like a journalist to delve into that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108505</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108505</guid>
		<description>Well, the media (not ALL the media, you understand) is missing the biggest story of all.

I&#039;d like to see a journalist ask Secretary Perry if he believes in the disastrous effects of climate change now or is he still in denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the media (not ALL the media, you understand) is missing the biggest story of all.</p>
<p>I'd like to see a journalist ask Secretary Perry if he believes in the disastrous effects of climate change now or is he still in denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/28/distracted-reporting/#comment-108504</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 01:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14390#comment-108504</guid>
		<description>A government shutdown post hurricane would be a bit &quot;unseemly.&quot;  Some new
Trump cards come into play, some others may have to be discarded.  I don&#039;t think the full impact has sunk in, or evened been assessed yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A government shutdown post hurricane would be a bit "unseemly."  Some new<br />
Trump cards come into play, some others may have to be discarded.  I don't think the full impact has sunk in, or evened been assessed yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
