<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trump&#039;s Polling Remarkably Flat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 07:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LeaningBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-103378</link>
		<dc:creator>LeaningBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-103378</guid>
		<description>59 - 
&lt;i&gt;You have to RESPECT people&#039;s beliefs... Even if that belief manifests as bigotry..&lt;/i&gt;

No. I don&#039;t.  I have to respect the rights of people to profess their beliefs.

If it is bigotry, there are boundaries beyond those which will personally constrain how a bigot acts out.

Segregation was state-sponsored bigotry.  As Robert Bork wrote in explaining his support for the 1954 &lt;i&gt;Brown&lt;/i&gt; decision: &lt;i&gt;The Court&#039;s realistic choice ... was either to abandon the quest for equality by allowing segregation or to forbid segregation in order to achieve equality. ... The purpose that brought the fourteenth amendment into being was equality before the law, and equality, not separation, was written into the law.&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe it&#039;s worth recalling, if only in passing, that Bork was denied a seat on that Court, In my view of that history, it was because he lacked an equitable, i.e., moral, compass.  He had demonstrated that lack by his participation in Nixon&#039;s attempt at obstruction. That, facing the plain fact that the nation&#039;s rule of law was in peril. 

So long as there were more patriots than not on the watch, one who had ignored that peril would ever be seated on the Court. No amount of debate over the extent of Executive power was going to change that reality.

Nonetheless, he had a good life that he deserved from his scholarship and public service. He also enjoyed   meaningful support from some of the many people who, until this day, believe that he had been, well, borked.  I obviously don&#039;t agree with it, but I can respect that belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>59 -<br />
<i>You have to RESPECT people's beliefs... Even if that belief manifests as bigotry..</i></p>
<p>No. I don't.  I have to respect the rights of people to profess their beliefs.</p>
<p>If it is bigotry, there are boundaries beyond those which will personally constrain how a bigot acts out.</p>
<p>Segregation was state-sponsored bigotry.  As Robert Bork wrote in explaining his support for the 1954 <i>Brown</i> decision: <i>The Court's realistic choice ... was either to abandon the quest for equality by allowing segregation or to forbid segregation in order to achieve equality. ... The purpose that brought the fourteenth amendment into being was equality before the law, and equality, not separation, was written into the law.</i></p>
<p>Maybe it's worth recalling, if only in passing, that Bork was denied a seat on that Court, In my view of that history, it was because he lacked an equitable, i.e., moral, compass.  He had demonstrated that lack by his participation in Nixon's attempt at obstruction. That, facing the plain fact that the nation's rule of law was in peril. </p>
<p>So long as there were more patriots than not on the watch, one who had ignored that peril would ever be seated on the Court. No amount of debate over the extent of Executive power was going to change that reality.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, he had a good life that he deserved from his scholarship and public service. He also enjoyed   meaningful support from some of the many people who, until this day, believe that he had been, well, borked.  I obviously don't agree with it, but I can respect that belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102170</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102170</guid>
		<description>TheStig [10] -

&lt;em&gt;Trump&#039;s popularity has gone flat in the last few weeks? I don&#039;t think the trend should be ground that fine. Looking at the RCP running average plot, I notice the current couple of flat-ish weeks doesn&#039;t look much different than the flat-sh weeks in Feb. and April. There is a lot of noise in these plots.&lt;/em&gt;

Yeah, you&#039;re totally right about the granularity.  I even admitted as much in the article:

&lt;em&gt;This article is guilty of examining the polls too closely, in other words -- when you only check in once a month, these things tend to smooth out more than when you take snapshot of less than a month.&lt;/em&gt;

But so far it is looking like taking a snapshot now (even with the whole &quot;making too much stew from one oyster&quot; problem) was the way to go, because Trump&#039;s numbers may be taking a new dive.  But (speaking of granularity) that&#039;s only like two DAYS&#039; worth of data, so to say it is premature to say that is an understatement...

Ain&#039;t poll-watchin&#039; fun?

Heh.

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TheStig [10] -</p>
<p><em>Trump's popularity has gone flat in the last few weeks? I don't think the trend should be ground that fine. Looking at the RCP running average plot, I notice the current couple of flat-ish weeks doesn't look much different than the flat-sh weeks in Feb. and April. There is a lot of noise in these plots.</em></p>
<p>Yeah, you're totally right about the granularity.  I even admitted as much in the article:</p>
<p><em>This article is guilty of examining the polls too closely, in other words -- when you only check in once a month, these things tend to smooth out more than when you take snapshot of less than a month.</em></p>
<p>But so far it is looking like taking a snapshot now (even with the whole "making too much stew from one oyster" problem) was the way to go, because Trump's numbers may be taking a new dive.  But (speaking of granularity) that's only like two DAYS' worth of data, so to say it is premature to say that is an understatement...</p>
<p>Ain't poll-watchin' fun?</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102169</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102169</guid>
		<description>michale [9] -

Oh, OK, got the cite.  This is the last time I&#039;m ever going to try to do these backwards!  My apologies.

Clinton recovered from the &quot;gays in the military&quot; backlash.  Within weeks.  Think Trump will do the same?  Doubtful.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale [9] -</p>
<p>Oh, OK, got the cite.  This is the last time I'm ever going to try to do these backwards!  My apologies.</p>
<p>Clinton recovered from the "gays in the military" backlash.  Within weeks.  Think Trump will do the same?  Doubtful.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102168</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102168</guid>
		<description>michale [30] -

Cite?  I have Clinton at 41.2% approval at this point in his presidency (Gallup #, I believe).  Trump&#039;s below that.  And Clinton improved up to 44% the next month.  Really think Trump can hit that number next month?  I doubt it.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale [30] -</p>
<p>Cite?  I have Clinton at 41.2% approval at this point in his presidency (Gallup #, I believe).  Trump's below that.  And Clinton improved up to 44% the next month.  Really think Trump can hit that number next month?  I doubt it.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102167</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102167</guid>
		<description>Balthasar [32] -

See, this is what I get for trying to answer these from the bottom up for once....

Makes MUCH more sense that Sessions was the one with the &quot;scared Bilbo look&quot;.

Thanks.  Had me worried there for a moment.  My apologies to michale, who was just quoting this...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar [32] -</p>
<p>See, this is what I get for trying to answer these from the bottom up for once....</p>
<p>Makes MUCH more sense that Sessions was the one with the "scared Bilbo look".</p>
<p>Thanks.  Had me worried there for a moment.  My apologies to michale, who was just quoting this...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102166</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102166</guid>
		<description>michale [37] -

Bilbo?  Seriously?  

Poll 100 people with a photo of Comey and Sessions, and ask them which one most resembles a hobbit.  My money&#039;d be on 90+ pointing to Sessions, personally.

Heh.

But then I&#039;ve always thought he looked more like...

https://www.google.com/search?q=dopey&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=isch&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwi4xpKthbDUAhUB4mMKHRb0DY8Q_AUICigB

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale [37] -</p>
<p>Bilbo?  Seriously?  </p>
<p>Poll 100 people with a photo of Comey and Sessions, and ask them which one most resembles a hobbit.  My money'd be on 90+ pointing to Sessions, personally.</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>But then I've always thought he looked more like...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=dopey&#038;source=lnms&#038;tbm=isch&#038;sa=X&#038;ved=0ahUKEwi4xpKthbDUAhUB4mMKHRb0DY8Q_AUICigB" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/search?q=dopey&#038;source=lnms&#038;tbm=isch&#038;sa=X&#038;ved=0ahUKEwi4xpKthbDUAhUB4mMKHRb0DY8Q_AUICigB</a></p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102165</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102165</guid>
		<description>nypoet22 [43] and Kick [45] -

I dunno, call me old school, but...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qHX493bB3U

Heh.  &quot;You make ever&#039;thang groooooo-vay!&quot;

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nypoet22 [43] and Kick [45] -</p>
<p>I dunno, call me old school, but...</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qHX493bB3U" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qHX493bB3U</a></p>
<p>Heh.  "You make ever'thang groooooo-vay!"</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102164</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102164</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, back at the ranch...

Trump&#039;s polling seems to be taking another dive.  Appr. down to 39.0 (new low), and disapp. up to 55.3 (new high) for an underwater spread of 16.3.

And that&#039;s BEFORE the Comey testimony resonates.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, back at the ranch...</p>
<p>Trump's polling seems to be taking another dive.  Appr. down to 39.0 (new low), and disapp. up to 55.3 (new high) for an underwater spread of 16.3.</p>
<p>And that's BEFORE the Comey testimony resonates.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102102</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 16:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102102</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to face reality, people..

This is a complete and utter decimation of the hysterical anti-Trumpers and their hysterical accusations against President Trump.....

I could not have had a better day if I scripted this myself!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's time to face reality, people..</p>
<p>This is a complete and utter decimation of the hysterical anti-Trumpers and their hysterical accusations against President Trump.....</p>
<p>I could not have had a better day if I scripted this myself!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102100</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 16:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102100</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***

&quot;Attorney General Loretta Lynch was looking to align the Clinton campaign language with our language, which... gave me a queasy feeling.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-former Director Comey

Ahhhhhhhhhh  So Comey&#039;s decision to go over the head of AG Lynch directly to the American people was a sound and correct decision...

Yer stock is rising, Comey...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***</p>
<p>"Attorney General Loretta Lynch was looking to align the Clinton campaign language with our language, which... gave me a queasy feeling."</b><br />
-former Director Comey</p>
<p>Ahhhhhhhhhh  So Comey's decision to go over the head of AG Lynch directly to the American people was a sound and correct decision...</p>
<p>Yer stock is rising, Comey...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102098</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102098</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***

After his firing and Trump&#039;s tweet, Comey asked a close friend of his — Columbia law professor Daniel Richman — to leak the content of his memos to the media with the hope of triggering the appointment of a special counsel.&lt;/B&gt;

So it was COMEY who leaked his memos..

I am losing respect for Comey....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***</p>
<p>After his firing and Trump's tweet, Comey asked a close friend of his — Columbia law professor Daniel Richman — to leak the content of his memos to the media with the hope of triggering the appointment of a special counsel.</b></p>
<p>So it was COMEY who leaked his memos..</p>
<p>I am losing respect for Comey....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102097</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102097</guid>
		<description>Victoria,

I admire that you can put on a brave face...  And your ability to spin!??  Excellent..

But the FACTS clearly show that this is DEVASTATING for the anti-Trumpers..

Comey is confirming that everything Trump said was true on the issues and that the MSM, ya&#039;all and the Dumbocrats were flat out WRONG about everything..

You said there was gonna be bombshells and there are none.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victoria,</p>
<p>I admire that you can put on a brave face...  And your ability to spin!??  Excellent..</p>
<p>But the FACTS clearly show that this is DEVASTATING for the anti-Trumpers..</p>
<p>Comey is confirming that everything Trump said was true on the issues and that the MSM, ya'all and the Dumbocrats were flat out WRONG about everything..</p>
<p>You said there was gonna be bombshells and there are none.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102096</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102096</guid>
		<description>Michale
70

&lt;i&gt;The Left has built up the Comey testimony as The Trump Slayer.... &lt;/i&gt;

Quite the contrary. The Comey testimony is but the tip of the iceberg. If you pay attention, read the written testimony, you can actually tell from language tense regarding the date the FBI actually did open an investigation into the President. 

Keep in mind that the State of New York is on the case. Trump fired Preet Bharara because he was building a strong RICO case against Trump involving money laundering, etc., and AG Schneiderman took over from there. The Trump Foundation &quot;slush fund&quot; investigation is yet another tip of the huge and bigly iceberg. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
70</p>
<p><i>The Left has built up the Comey testimony as The Trump Slayer.... </i></p>
<p>Quite the contrary. The Comey testimony is but the tip of the iceberg. If you pay attention, read the written testimony, you can actually tell from language tense regarding the date the FBI actually did open an investigation into the President. </p>
<p>Keep in mind that the State of New York is on the case. Trump fired Preet Bharara because he was building a strong RICO case against Trump involving money laundering, etc., and AG Schneiderman took over from there. The Trump Foundation "slush fund" investigation is yet another tip of the huge and bigly iceberg. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102095</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102095</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***&lt;/B&gt;


And ANOTHER MSM accusation has been exposed as a complete and total lie!!!!!

&lt;B&gt;Comey Debunks NYT Report About Trump Campaign Having Repeated Contacts With Russians

“In the main – it was not true,” Comey said. “The challenge -- and I’m not picking on reporters -- about writing stories about classified information is that people talking about it often don’t really know what is going on. And those of us who actually know what’s going on aren’t talking about it. And we don’t call the press to say, hey, you got that thing wrong about this sensitive topic. We just have to leave it there.”&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/comey-debunks-nyt-report-about-trump-campaign-having-repeated-contacts

ppppppppffffffffffffssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

The air is continuing to leak from ya&#039;all&#039;s hysterical accusations against President Trump..

Who could have POSSIBLY predicted that all those anonymous sources from all those media outlets would be totally and completely full of shit!!

Oh... Wait...  :D

Face reality, people...  Ya&#039;all are going down in flames..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***</b></p>
<p>And ANOTHER MSM accusation has been exposed as a complete and total lie!!!!!</p>
<p><b>Comey Debunks NYT Report About Trump Campaign Having Repeated Contacts With Russians</p>
<p>“In the main – it was not true,” Comey said. “The challenge -- and I’m not picking on reporters -- about writing stories about classified information is that people talking about it often don’t really know what is going on. And those of us who actually know what’s going on aren’t talking about it. And we don’t call the press to say, hey, you got that thing wrong about this sensitive topic. We just have to leave it there.”</b><br />
<a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/comey-debunks-nyt-report-about-trump-campaign-having-repeated-contacts" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/comey-debunks-nyt-report-about-trump-campaign-having-repeated-contacts</a></p>
<p>ppppppppffffffffffffssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss</p>
<p>The air is continuing to leak from ya'all's hysterical accusations against President Trump..</p>
<p>Who could have POSSIBLY predicted that all those anonymous sources from all those media outlets would be totally and completely full of shit!!</p>
<p>Oh... Wait...  :D</p>
<p>Face reality, people...  Ya'all are going down in flames..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102088</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102088</guid>
		<description>Veronica,

&lt;I&gt;Yes, and thereby Comey&#039;s testimony would be delayed, the investigating committees would take their cases to the courts, and please check history for how that worked out for Nixon, Clinton, Obama, etc. to understand why it would only delay Comey&#039;s testimony.&lt;/I&gt;

You can obfuscate and discuss what the meaning of &#039;is&#039; is until the cows come home..

But the fact reminds that President Trump invoking EP would effectively silence Comey..

Since President Trump DIDN&#039;T do it, it indicates a level of confidence that anything COmey would say would NOT be damaging at all..

Confidence, it appears, that was dead on ballz accurate....

You lost..  Get over it..

But I have to give you credit for actually showing up...  As embarrassing as it is to be so completely and utterly WRONG, you still showed...  

You deserve credit for that....   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veronica,</p>
<p><i>Yes, and thereby Comey's testimony would be delayed, the investigating committees would take their cases to the courts, and please check history for how that worked out for Nixon, Clinton, Obama, etc. to understand why it would only delay Comey's testimony.</i></p>
<p>You can obfuscate and discuss what the meaning of 'is' is until the cows come home..</p>
<p>But the fact reminds that President Trump invoking EP would effectively silence Comey..</p>
<p>Since President Trump DIDN'T do it, it indicates a level of confidence that anything COmey would say would NOT be damaging at all..</p>
<p>Confidence, it appears, that was dead on ballz accurate....</p>
<p>You lost..  Get over it..</p>
<p>But I have to give you credit for actually showing up...  As embarrassing as it is to be so completely and utterly WRONG, you still showed...  </p>
<p>You deserve credit for that....   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102087</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102087</guid>
		<description>Kick,

I owe you a sincere apology...

There *IS* a bombshell coming out of the Comey hearing..

&lt;B&gt;Under questioning by panel chairman Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), Comey said that he was uncomfortable with the unexpected meeting Lynch had with former President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac last year. 

Comey said that meeting convinced him that the independence of the investigation was tainted with regard to the Justice Department and led him to go public with the bureau&#039;s findings on Clinton. &lt;/B&gt;

Of course I am sure you and every one else here will join me in applauding former Director Comey&#039;s honesty and integrity....

{/sarcasm}

heheheheheheheheheheheheehehehehe

Oh my gods, could this be any more of a perfect day!!! I got my new fitbit Blaze and the hysterical Anti-Trumpers are going down in flames!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick,</p>
<p>I owe you a sincere apology...</p>
<p>There *IS* a bombshell coming out of the Comey hearing..</p>
<p><b>Under questioning by panel chairman Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), Comey said that he was uncomfortable with the unexpected meeting Lynch had with former President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac last year. </p>
<p>Comey said that meeting convinced him that the independence of the investigation was tainted with regard to the Justice Department and led him to go public with the bureau's findings on Clinton. </b></p>
<p>Of course I am sure you and every one else here will join me in applauding former Director Comey's honesty and integrity....</p>
<p>{/sarcasm}</p>
<p>heheheheheheheheheheheheehehehehe</p>
<p>Oh my gods, could this be any more of a perfect day!!! I got my new fitbit Blaze and the hysterical Anti-Trumpers are going down in flames!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102086</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102086</guid>
		<description>Michale
56

&lt;i&gt;All President Trump has to say is that their conversations were private and the President is invoking Executive Privilege and &#039;viola.... Comey cannot testify... &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, and thereby Comey&#039;s testimony would be delayed, the investigating committees would take their cases to the courts, and please check history for how that worked out for Nixon, Clinton, Obama, etc. to understand why it would only delay Comey&#039;s testimony. 

That is a slam dunk loser of a case, by the way, because it would take a special kind of stupid for Trump and/or his legal team to claim that his conversations with Director Comey carried Executive Privilege after Trump himself tweeted about them and also spoke about them multiple times in public. Trump himself and Sarah Huckabee Sanders are both on record stating that Comey was fired in order to hasten the end of the Russia issue. Invoking Executive Privilege and slowing down proceedings would prove Trump lied and was trying to impede the investigation. 

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) was a unanimous 8–0 ruling against President Richard Nixon that &lt;b&gt;limits the power of any U.S. president to claim executive privilege&lt;/b&gt;. The SCOTUS rejected Nixon&#039;s claim to an &quot;absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances.&quot;

Not the first time I have said this, but you can either crack a book and educate yourself or get your information from right-wing propaganda sites wherein they are lying to you and deflecting. Propaganda has been known to render a person a &quot;useful idiot,&quot; and it is a choice you make when you rely heavily on right-wing talking points versus precedent setting long settled case law  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
56</p>
<p><i>All President Trump has to say is that their conversations were private and the President is invoking Executive Privilege and 'viola.... Comey cannot testify... </i></p>
<p>Yes, and thereby Comey's testimony would be delayed, the investigating committees would take their cases to the courts, and please check history for how that worked out for Nixon, Clinton, Obama, etc. to understand why it would only delay Comey's testimony. </p>
<p>That is a slam dunk loser of a case, by the way, because it would take a special kind of stupid for Trump and/or his legal team to claim that his conversations with Director Comey carried Executive Privilege after Trump himself tweeted about them and also spoke about them multiple times in public. Trump himself and Sarah Huckabee Sanders are both on record stating that Comey was fired in order to hasten the end of the Russia issue. Invoking Executive Privilege and slowing down proceedings would prove Trump lied and was trying to impede the investigation. </p>
<p>United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) was a unanimous 8–0 ruling against President Richard Nixon that <b>limits the power of any U.S. president to claim executive privilege</b>. The SCOTUS rejected Nixon's claim to an "absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances."</p>
<p>Not the first time I have said this, but you can either crack a book and educate yourself or get your information from right-wing propaganda sites wherein they are lying to you and deflecting. Propaganda has been known to render a person a "useful idiot," and it is a choice you make when you rely heavily on right-wing talking points versus precedent setting long settled case law  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102080</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 14:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102080</guid>
		<description>And here I thought this section of Weigantia wold be BLAZING with comments on how this is the beginning of the end of Trump and how it&#039;s going to take down the President and all these &quot;bombshells&quot; are going to unite ALL of the Dumbocrat Party!!!!

Instead, it&#039;s nothing but a funeral dirge from ya&#039;all...

Simply more nails in the coffin of the dead Democrat Party...

What a difference a day makes..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought this section of Weigantia wold be BLAZING with comments on how this is the beginning of the end of Trump and how it's going to take down the President and all these "bombshells" are going to unite ALL of the Dumbocrat Party!!!!</p>
<p>Instead, it's nothing but a funeral dirge from ya'all...</p>
<p>Simply more nails in the coffin of the dead Democrat Party...</p>
<p>What a difference a day makes..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102075</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 14:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102075</guid>
		<description>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/336871-cnn-issues-correction-after-comey-statement-contradicts-reporting

This is what happens when people take &#039;anonymous sources&#039; as facts..

They look foolish, politically bigoted and downright stoopid...

When will ya&#039;all learn....  

FACTS rule the day...

Not anonymous sources from political dolts with an obvious ax to grind...

One would think that, after getting burned time and time and time again, ya&#039;all would get a clue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/336871-cnn-issues-correction-after-comey-statement-contradicts-reporting" rel="nofollow">http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/336871-cnn-issues-correction-after-comey-statement-contradicts-reporting</a></p>
<p>This is what happens when people take 'anonymous sources' as facts..</p>
<p>They look foolish, politically bigoted and downright stoopid...</p>
<p>When will ya'all learn....  </p>
<p>FACTS rule the day...</p>
<p>Not anonymous sources from political dolts with an obvious ax to grind...</p>
<p>One would think that, after getting burned time and time and time again, ya'all would get a clue...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102063</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102063</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Sifting through the wreckage of the 2016 election, Democratic pollsters, strategists and sympathetic academics have reached some unnerving conclusions.

What the autopsy reveals is that Democratic losses among working class voters were not limited to whites; that crucial constituencies within the party see its leaders as alien; and that unity over economic populism may not be able to turn back the conservative tide.

Equally disturbing, winning back former party loyalists who switched to Trump will be tough: these white voters’ views on immigration and race are in direct conflict with fundamental Democratic tenets.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/opinion/the-democratic-party-is-in-worse-shape-than-you-thought.html

And this is why the Left Wingery, including the majority of Weigantians are putting so many eggs in the Comey basket...

ANYTHING to distract the American people from the knowledge that the Democrat Party is on it&#039;s way out...

But, as usual, the Left and ya&#039;all overreached..  Promised &quot;bombshells&quot; where none will be found...

The only &quot;bombshells&quot; are things that we already know and that ya&#039;all called lies..

Well, looks like the liar shoe is on the other foot!  :D

And we haven&#039;t even gotten to the actual testimony yet!!!  :D

It can only get worse for Democrats...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Sifting through the wreckage of the 2016 election, Democratic pollsters, strategists and sympathetic academics have reached some unnerving conclusions.</p>
<p>What the autopsy reveals is that Democratic losses among working class voters were not limited to whites; that crucial constituencies within the party see its leaders as alien; and that unity over economic populism may not be able to turn back the conservative tide.</p>
<p>Equally disturbing, winning back former party loyalists who switched to Trump will be tough: these white voters’ views on immigration and race are in direct conflict with fundamental Democratic tenets.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/opinion/the-democratic-party-is-in-worse-shape-than-you-thought.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/opinion/the-democratic-party-is-in-worse-shape-than-you-thought.html</a></p>
<p>And this is why the Left Wingery, including the majority of Weigantians are putting so many eggs in the Comey basket...</p>
<p>ANYTHING to distract the American people from the knowledge that the Democrat Party is on it's way out...</p>
<p>But, as usual, the Left and ya'all overreached..  Promised "bombshells" where none will be found...</p>
<p>The only "bombshells" are things that we already know and that ya'all called lies..</p>
<p>Well, looks like the liar shoe is on the other foot!  :D</p>
<p>And we haven't even gotten to the actual testimony yet!!!  :D</p>
<p>It can only get worse for Democrats...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102062</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102062</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;So far, Jim Comey is disappointing the witch-hunters&lt;/B&gt;
http://nypost.com/2017/06/07/so-far-jim-comey-is-disappointing-the-witch-hunters/

The Left has built up the Comey testimony as The Trump Slayer....

Ya&#039;all can&#039;t even comprehend how much I am laughing my ass off that it turns out that Comey&#039;s testimony is actually Trump&#039;s shield!!!!  

Who could have POSSIBLY predicted that this would happen...

Oh... Wait....   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>So far, Jim Comey is disappointing the witch-hunters</b><br />
<a href="http://nypost.com/2017/06/07/so-far-jim-comey-is-disappointing-the-witch-hunters/" rel="nofollow">http://nypost.com/2017/06/07/so-far-jim-comey-is-disappointing-the-witch-hunters/</a></p>
<p>The Left has built up the Comey testimony as The Trump Slayer....</p>
<p>Ya'all can't even comprehend how much I am laughing my ass off that it turns out that Comey's testimony is actually Trump's shield!!!!  </p>
<p>Who could have POSSIBLY predicted that this would happen...</p>
<p>Oh... Wait....   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102060</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102060</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt; “I have never been pressured—I have never felt pressured—to intervene or interfere in any way with shaping intelligence in a political way or in relation to an ongoing investigation.”&lt;/B&gt;
-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats

&lt;B&gt; “I have never been asked or pressured to do anything I believe to be illegal, immoral, unethical or inappropriate.”&lt;/B&gt;
-National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers 

ppppppppfffffffffffffsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> “I have never been pressured—I have never felt pressured—to intervene or interfere in any way with shaping intelligence in a political way or in relation to an ongoing investigation.”</b><br />
-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats</p>
<p><b> “I have never been asked or pressured to do anything I believe to be illegal, immoral, unethical or inappropriate.”</b><br />
-National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers </p>
<p>ppppppppfffffffffffffsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102059</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102059</guid>
		<description>Oh Baaaallllttthhhhsaaaarrrrrrrrr???

&lt;B&gt;Mr. Comey says Mr. Trump strongly suggested in February that he close the Michael Flynn file, but after conferring with his “FBI senior leadership” he decided not to relay the conversation to Attorney General Jeff Sessions or any other Justice Department superior.&lt;/B&gt;

So, answer something for me...

How can Sessions give a &quot;Bilbo Scared&quot; look to Comey when Sessions wasn&#039;t even TOLD about the detailed memo???

You lied..

Comey never told Sessions about the Flynn meeting...

And, since it was Comey&#039;s *DUTY* to tell the AG if Comey thought that the President was trying to obstruct justice and Comey DIDN&#039;T tell the AG, then obviously Comey didn&#039;t feel that the President was trying to obstruct justice..

In an attempt to make an impossible case, you lied and changed the &quot;facts&quot; to suit your narrative..

I won&#039;t even bother with the ***BOMBSHELL** label because that ISN&#039;T a bombshell... 

It&#039;s standard MO for many MANY Weigantians...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Baaaallllttthhhhsaaaarrrrrrrrr???</p>
<p><b>Mr. Comey says Mr. Trump strongly suggested in February that he close the Michael Flynn file, but after conferring with his “FBI senior leadership” he decided not to relay the conversation to Attorney General Jeff Sessions or any other Justice Department superior.</b></p>
<p>So, answer something for me...</p>
<p>How can Sessions give a "Bilbo Scared" look to Comey when Sessions wasn't even TOLD about the detailed memo???</p>
<p>You lied..</p>
<p>Comey never told Sessions about the Flynn meeting...</p>
<p>And, since it was Comey's *DUTY* to tell the AG if Comey thought that the President was trying to obstruct justice and Comey DIDN'T tell the AG, then obviously Comey didn't feel that the President was trying to obstruct justice..</p>
<p>In an attempt to make an impossible case, you lied and changed the "facts" to suit your narrative..</p>
<p>I won't even bother with the ***BOMBSHELL** label because that ISN'T a bombshell... </p>
<p>It's standard MO for many MANY Weigantians...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102055</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102055</guid>
		<description>Ooooo!!! 16 straight comments!!!

And NO SIGN of slowing down!!!!  

I can tell it&#039;s going to be a grand day!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooo!!! 16 straight comments!!!</p>
<p>And NO SIGN of slowing down!!!!  </p>
<p>I can tell it's going to be a grand day!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102054</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102054</guid>
		<description>And another point that ya&#039;all must consider..  If ya&#039;all were so inclined to consider actual FACTS, I mean...

Special Prosecutor Mueller signed off on Comey&#039;s testimony and, you can be sure, had a hand in writing Comey&#039;s opening statement...

By actually supporting President Trump&#039;s statements to the hilt, Mueller via Comey is signaling quite clearly the focus of Mueller&#039;s investigation is NOT on President Trump....

ppppppffffffffffffffffffffssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

There&#039;s that sound again....  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another point that ya'all must consider..  If ya'all were so inclined to consider actual FACTS, I mean...</p>
<p>Special Prosecutor Mueller signed off on Comey's testimony and, you can be sure, had a hand in writing Comey's opening statement...</p>
<p>By actually supporting President Trump's statements to the hilt, Mueller via Comey is signaling quite clearly the focus of Mueller's investigation is NOT on President Trump....</p>
<p>ppppppffffffffffffffffffffssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss</p>
<p>There's that sound again....  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102052</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102052</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;I viewed the President&#039;s &#039;I hope you can let this go&#039; comment regarding the FBI probe into Mike Flynn as entirely unrelated to the broader investigation into Russia or possible links to his campaign.&lt;/B&gt;
-Fromer FBI Director Comey

pppppppffffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

That&#039;s the sound of hot air escaping from the Democrat Party&#039;s Obstruction Of Justice case against President Trump...

:D

Oh wait..  Was that a BOMBSHELL!???  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I viewed the President's 'I hope you can let this go' comment regarding the FBI probe into Mike Flynn as entirely unrelated to the broader investigation into Russia or possible links to his campaign.</b><br />
-Fromer FBI Director Comey</p>
<p>pppppppffffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt</p>
<p>That's the sound of hot air escaping from the Democrat Party's Obstruction Of Justice case against President Trump...</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Oh wait..  Was that a BOMBSHELL!???  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102049</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102049</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***

&quot;The president went on to say that if there were some &#039;satellite&#039; associates of his who did something wrong, it would be good to find that out,&quot; &lt;/B&gt;
-Former FBI Director Comey

Well, isn&#039;t this interesting...

President Trump *ENCOURAGED* then Director Comey to continue the investigation and root out those who WERE committing crimes...

Far from OBSTRUCTING justice, President Trump was FURTHERING justice, ENCOURAGING justice....

Oh the embarrassment and humiliation ya&#039;all must feel right now....  :D

It&#039;s no fun when the shoe is on the OTHER foot, eh??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***</p>
<p>"The president went on to say that if there were some 'satellite' associates of his who did something wrong, it would be good to find that out," </b><br />
-Former FBI Director Comey</p>
<p>Well, isn't this interesting...</p>
<p>President Trump *ENCOURAGED* then Director Comey to continue the investigation and root out those who WERE committing crimes...</p>
<p>Far from OBSTRUCTING justice, President Trump was FURTHERING justice, ENCOURAGING justice....</p>
<p>Oh the embarrassment and humiliation ya'all must feel right now....  :D</p>
<p>It's no fun when the shoe is on the OTHER foot, eh??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102048</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102048</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***

1.  January 6th Meeting at Trump Tower:
&quot;In that context, prior to the January 6 meeting, I discussed with the FBI’s leadership team whether I should be prepared to assure President-Elect Trump that we were not investigating him personally. That was true; we did not have an open counter-intelligence case on him. We agreed I should do so if circumstances warranted. During our one-on-one meeting at Trump Tower, based on President Elect Trump’s reaction to the briefing and without him directly asking the question, I offered that assurance.&quot;
 
2.  January 27th Dinner at White House:
&quot;During the dinner, the President returned to the salacious material I had briefed him about on January 6, and, as he had done previously, expressed his disgust for the allegations and strongly denied them. He said he was considering ordering me to investigate the alleged incident to prove it didn’t happen. I replied that he should give that careful thought because it might create a narrative that we were investigating him personally, which we weren’t, and because it was very difficult to prove a negative. He said he would think about it and asked me to think about it.&quot;
 
3.  March 30 Phone Call:
&quot;I explained that we had briefed the leadership of Congress on exactly which individuals we were investigating and that we had told those Congressional leaders that we were not personally investigating President Trump. I reminded him I had previously told him that.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Former FBI Director Comey&#039;s testimony...

&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***&lt;/B&gt;

Looks like Director Comey told President TRUMP three times that the President was not under investigation...

Hmmmmmmmm  I seem to have heard that before..

SOMEONE told us that before and then a whole bunch of ignorant someone&#039;s said that it was a lie..

Hmmmmmmm

I can&#039;t recall who it was....

:D  heh

It&#039;s gonna be a fun day filled with &lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELLS***&lt;/B&gt; that totally, utterly, unequivocally and completely devastates ya&#039;all&#039;s accusations against President Trump...

Ya see what happens when ya&#039;all let yer PTDS speak for ya&#039;all???

Ya&#039;all end up saying stoopid, inane and totally bullshit shit...

If ya&#039;all stack with FACTS instead of all yer anonymous sources claptrap, ya&#039;all wouldn&#039;t be looking like impotent fools right now.....

I&#039;m just sayin&#039;... Just tryin&#039; to help out..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***</p>
<p>1.  January 6th Meeting at Trump Tower:<br />
"In that context, prior to the January 6 meeting, I discussed with the FBI’s leadership team whether I should be prepared to assure President-Elect Trump that we were not investigating him personally. That was true; we did not have an open counter-intelligence case on him. We agreed I should do so if circumstances warranted. During our one-on-one meeting at Trump Tower, based on President Elect Trump’s reaction to the briefing and without him directly asking the question, I offered that assurance."</p>
<p>2.  January 27th Dinner at White House:<br />
"During the dinner, the President returned to the salacious material I had briefed him about on January 6, and, as he had done previously, expressed his disgust for the allegations and strongly denied them. He said he was considering ordering me to investigate the alleged incident to prove it didn’t happen. I replied that he should give that careful thought because it might create a narrative that we were investigating him personally, which we weren’t, and because it was very difficult to prove a negative. He said he would think about it and asked me to think about it."</p>
<p>3.  March 30 Phone Call:<br />
"I explained that we had briefed the leadership of Congress on exactly which individuals we were investigating and that we had told those Congressional leaders that we were not personally investigating President Trump. I reminded him I had previously told him that."</b><br />
-Former FBI Director Comey's testimony...</p>
<p><b>***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL*** ***BOMBSHELL***</b></p>
<p>Looks like Director Comey told President TRUMP three times that the President was not under investigation...</p>
<p>Hmmmmmmmm  I seem to have heard that before..</p>
<p>SOMEONE told us that before and then a whole bunch of ignorant someone's said that it was a lie..</p>
<p>Hmmmmmmm</p>
<p>I can't recall who it was....</p>
<p>:D  heh</p>
<p>It's gonna be a fun day filled with <b>***BOMBSHELLS***</b> that totally, utterly, unequivocally and completely devastates ya'all's accusations against President Trump...</p>
<p>Ya see what happens when ya'all let yer PTDS speak for ya'all???</p>
<p>Ya'all end up saying stoopid, inane and totally bullshit shit...</p>
<p>If ya'all stack with FACTS instead of all yer anonymous sources claptrap, ya'all wouldn't be looking like impotent fools right now.....</p>
<p>I'm just sayin'... Just tryin' to help out..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102044</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102044</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Finally, Comey’s remarks contradict a report in ABC News suggesting that “Comey has told associates” he will dispute Trump’s claim that he was told on three separate occasions that the president was not personally under investigation. According to Comey, he did precisely that.&lt;/B&gt;

OHMYGODS!!!!!!

&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL*** &lt;/B&gt;

A news media&#039;s anonymous sources were FLAT OUT and UNEQUIVOCALLY WRONG!!!!!

OHMYGODS, what a BOMBSHELL!!!!!

&lt;B&gt;***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL*** &lt;/B&gt;



&lt;B&gt;&quot;I can do this all day..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Captain America

And likely will....  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Finally, Comey’s remarks contradict a report in ABC News suggesting that “Comey has told associates” he will dispute Trump’s claim that he was told on three separate occasions that the president was not personally under investigation. According to Comey, he did precisely that.</b></p>
<p>OHMYGODS!!!!!!</p>
<p><b>***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL*** </b></p>
<p>A news media's anonymous sources were FLAT OUT and UNEQUIVOCALLY WRONG!!!!!</p>
<p>OHMYGODS, what a BOMBSHELL!!!!!</p>
<p><b>***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL***  ***BOMBSHELL*** </b></p>
<p><b>"I can do this all day.."</b><br />
-Captain America</p>
<p>And likely will....  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102040</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102040</guid>
		<description>Grrrrr...

&lt;I&gt;Ya&#039;all are doing yerselves ANY favors by claiming there are going to be &quot;bombshells&quot;...&lt;/I&gt;

Ya&#039;all &lt;B&gt;AREN&#039;T&lt;/B&gt; doing yerselves ANY favors by claiming there are going to be &quot;bombshells&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrrrr...</p>
<p><i>Ya'all are doing yerselves ANY favors by claiming there are going to be "bombshells"...</i></p>
<p>Ya'all <b>AREN'T</b> doing yerselves ANY favors by claiming there are going to be "bombshells"...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102039</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102039</guid>
		<description>Veronica,

&lt;I&gt;Mark the date in your history book: May 9, 2017. That date was the beginning of the end... &lt;/I&gt;

OH MY GODS!!!!!

WHATTA BOMBSHELL!!!!

I have NEVER heard a &quot;TRUMP IS TOAST&quot; prediction here in Weigantia... EVER!!!!!  WOW!!!!!  That&#039;s AMAZING, Victoria!!!   :D

&lt;I&gt;seriously.&lt;/I&gt;

Oh... Well, if yer SERIOUS about it, I must give your BOMBSHELL it&#039;s due consideration...

........

BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

:D

The fact that you ARE &quot;serious&quot; about it shows how completely and utterly inane you are...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veronica,</p>
<p><i>Mark the date in your history book: May 9, 2017. That date was the beginning of the end... </i></p>
<p>OH MY GODS!!!!!</p>
<p>WHATTA BOMBSHELL!!!!</p>
<p>I have NEVER heard a "TRUMP IS TOAST" prediction here in Weigantia... EVER!!!!!  WOW!!!!!  That's AMAZING, Victoria!!!   :D</p>
<p><i>seriously.</i></p>
<p>Oh... Well, if yer SERIOUS about it, I must give your BOMBSHELL it's due consideration...</p>
<p>........</p>
<p>BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>The fact that you ARE "serious" about it shows how completely and utterly inane you are...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102038</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102038</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Is Comey Going to Be a Bust?
Democrats should lower expectations.

Expectations ahead of former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before a congressional panel on Thursday are high, and high expectations are easily unmet. Many believed that Comey, now a private citizen, would be unconstrained by professional courtesies and free from political compromises when delivering his testimony. Yet the released draft of Comey’s opening statement does not appear to suggest something explosive is forthcoming.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/james-comey-going-to-be-a-bust/

Ya&#039;all are doing yerselves ANY favors by claiming there are going to be &quot;bombshells&quot;...

And ya&#039;all are giving me PLENTY of fodder to point out how wrong ya&#039;all are..... AGAIN....  

Sometimes you people are yer own worst enemies...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Is Comey Going to Be a Bust?<br />
Democrats should lower expectations.</p>
<p>Expectations ahead of former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before a congressional panel on Thursday are high, and high expectations are easily unmet. Many believed that Comey, now a private citizen, would be unconstrained by professional courtesies and free from political compromises when delivering his testimony. Yet the released draft of Comey’s opening statement does not appear to suggest something explosive is forthcoming.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/james-comey-going-to-be-a-bust/" rel="nofollow">https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/james-comey-going-to-be-a-bust/</a></p>
<p>Ya'all are doing yerselves ANY favors by claiming there are going to be "bombshells"...</p>
<p>And ya'all are giving me PLENTY of fodder to point out how wrong ya'all are..... AGAIN....  </p>
<p>Sometimes you people are yer own worst enemies...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102037</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102037</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Former FBI Director James Comey&#039;s written statement, which was released in advance of his Thursday testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, does not provide evidence that President Trump committed obstruction of justice or any other crime. Indeed it strongly suggests that even under the broadest reasonable definition of obstruction, no such crime was committed.&lt;/B&gt;
-Attorney Alan Derschowitz

Sorry Weigantians...

No bombshells for you!!!   :D

hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Former FBI Director James Comey's written statement, which was released in advance of his Thursday testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, does not provide evidence that President Trump committed obstruction of justice or any other crime. Indeed it strongly suggests that even under the broadest reasonable definition of obstruction, no such crime was committed.</b><br />
-Attorney Alan Derschowitz</p>
<p>Sorry Weigantians...</p>
<p>No bombshells for you!!!   :D</p>
<p>hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102032</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102032</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;He&#039;ll will testify under oath that Trump repeatedly pressed him for his &quot;loyalty&quot; and directly pushed him to &quot;lift the cloud&quot; of investigation by declaring publicly the president was not the target of the probe into his campaign&#039;s Russia ties.&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;OHMYGODS!!!!!!!

BOMBSHELL!!!!!  BOMBSHELL!!!!!  BOMBSHELL!!!!!

A President Of The United States was demanding loyalty from a subordinate!!!!

OH MY GODS!!!!  WHAT A BOMBSHELL!!!!!  FORGET IMPEACHMENT!!!!  LETS JUST GO HANG &#039;IM!!!!!&lt;/B&gt;

I wonder if ya&#039;all can comprehend how completely and utterly ridiculous ya&#039;all look....

My guess is ya&#039;all know but ya don&#039;t care because the PTDS is too strong and all ya&#039;all care about is taking down President Trump....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He'll will testify under oath that Trump repeatedly pressed him for his "loyalty" and directly pushed him to "lift the cloud" of investigation by declaring publicly the president was not the target of the probe into his campaign's Russia ties.</i></p>
<p><b>OHMYGODS!!!!!!!</p>
<p>BOMBSHELL!!!!!  BOMBSHELL!!!!!  BOMBSHELL!!!!!</p>
<p>A President Of The United States was demanding loyalty from a subordinate!!!!</p>
<p>OH MY GODS!!!!  WHAT A BOMBSHELL!!!!!  FORGET IMPEACHMENT!!!!  LETS JUST GO HANG 'IM!!!!!</b></p>
<p>I wonder if ya'all can comprehend how completely and utterly ridiculous ya'all look....</p>
<p>My guess is ya'all know but ya don't care because the PTDS is too strong and all ya'all care about is taking down President Trump....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102029</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102029</guid>
		<description>Veronica,

&lt;I&gt;How many times do you have to be told that Trump couldn&#039;t have stopped James Comey&#039;s testimony? &lt;/I&gt;

Up to the point that you actually provide FACTS to support your bullshit claim...

But we both know that, like your bombshell claim, your current claim that President Trump (love typing that!!  :D) cannot invoke EP and stop Comey from testifying is ALSO total and complete bullshit...

All President Trump has to say is that their conversations were private and the President is invoking Executive Privilege and &#039;viola....  Comey cannot testify...

This is fact and no amount of hysterical bullshit you spew will change that fact...

Love the bombshells we had on Weds Victoria!!!   :D

BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You have been PWNED...  AGAIN...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veronica,</p>
<p><i>How many times do you have to be told that Trump couldn't have stopped James Comey's testimony? </i></p>
<p>Up to the point that you actually provide FACTS to support your bullshit claim...</p>
<p>But we both know that, like your bombshell claim, your current claim that President Trump (love typing that!!  :D) cannot invoke EP and stop Comey from testifying is ALSO total and complete bullshit...</p>
<p>All President Trump has to say is that their conversations were private and the President is invoking Executive Privilege and 'viola....  Comey cannot testify...</p>
<p>This is fact and no amount of hysterical bullshit you spew will change that fact...</p>
<p>Love the bombshells we had on Weds Victoria!!!   :D</p>
<p>BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>You have been PWNED...  AGAIN...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102028</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102028</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Even after Comey told the President that the proper way for him to contact the FBI was through the proper channels at the DOJ, Trump continued to call him directly!&lt;/I&gt;

And the moronic-ness continues!!!!  :^/

Russ, he&#039;s the President Of The Frakin&#039; United States!!!

If the President Of The United States wants to telephone the Director of the FBI directly, then the President Of The United States is going to damn well do it!!

This is EXACTLY what I mean by total and complete hysterical stoopidity!!!!

Your attacking President Trump because he didn&#039;t follow the direction of the Director Of The FBI!!!????

Surely an impeachable offense!!!

Jeezus H Christ ya&#039;all have lost your minds....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Even after Comey told the President that the proper way for him to contact the FBI was through the proper channels at the DOJ, Trump continued to call him directly!</i></p>
<p>And the moronic-ness continues!!!!  :^/</p>
<p>Russ, he's the President Of The Frakin' United States!!!</p>
<p>If the President Of The United States wants to telephone the Director of the FBI directly, then the President Of The United States is going to damn well do it!!</p>
<p>This is EXACTLY what I mean by total and complete hysterical stoopidity!!!!</p>
<p>Your attacking President Trump because he didn't follow the direction of the Director Of The FBI!!!????</p>
<p>Surely an impeachable offense!!!</p>
<p>Jeezus H Christ ya'all have lost your minds....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102027</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102027</guid>
		<description>OK, OK... It&#039;s probably NOT because you are dense..

I am sure it&#039;s just because you are blinded by such hatred and Party bigotry that you can&#039;t think logically..

That must be it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, OK... It's probably NOT because you are dense..</p>
<p>I am sure it's just because you are blinded by such hatred and Party bigotry that you can't think logically..</p>
<p>That must be it...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102026</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102026</guid>
		<description>Russ,

&lt;I&gt;And if Trump knew he was being recorded in Russia, then he had to have something to do with Russia! Why else would he be recorded?&lt;/I&gt;

Don&#039;t take this the wrong way...

But are you truly that dense!!!!????

Anyone who is anyone and has more than two brain cells to rub together knows that they are recorded when they go to Russia...

I mean, com&#039;on...  I *KNOW* you are smarter than this...

Jeesh....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p><i>And if Trump knew he was being recorded in Russia, then he had to have something to do with Russia! Why else would he be recorded?</i></p>
<p>Don't take this the wrong way...</p>
<p>But are you truly that dense!!!!????</p>
<p>Anyone who is anyone and has more than two brain cells to rub together knows that they are recorded when they go to Russia...</p>
<p>I mean, com'on...  I *KNOW* you are smarter than this...</p>
<p>Jeesh....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102024</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102024</guid>
		<description>Balthy,

&lt;I&gt;Oh, Sessions does that look all the time.&lt;/I&gt;

But he wasn&#039;t THERE to give Comey the look.

You made shit up...

And NOW we come to find out that Comey DID tell President Trump that the President was not under investigation...

Ya&#039;all said Trump was lying..

Turns out it was YA&#039;ALL that were lying...  

It&#039;s gonna be a fun day!!   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthy,</p>
<p><i>Oh, Sessions does that look all the time.</i></p>
<p>But he wasn't THERE to give Comey the look.</p>
<p>You made shit up...</p>
<p>And NOW we come to find out that Comey DID tell President Trump that the President was not under investigation...</p>
<p>Ya'all said Trump was lying..</p>
<p>Turns out it was YA'ALL that were lying...  </p>
<p>It's gonna be a fun day!!   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102023</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 07:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102023</guid>
		<description>Maxine Waters tweeted:&lt;b&gt;

“So Comey told Jeff Sessions he didn’t want to be alone with Trump.  Women across the country can relate.&quot;
&lt;/b&gt;

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh SNAP!   Snap, indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxine Waters tweeted:<b></p>
<p>“So Comey told Jeff Sessions he didn’t want to be alone with Trump.  Women across the country can relate."<br />
</b></p>
<p>Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh SNAP!   Snap, indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102022</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102022</guid>
		<description>Michale
29

&lt;i&gt;The mere fact that President Trump ALLOWED Comey to testify proves that there is just a big nothing-burger here... &lt;/i&gt;

How many times do you have to be told that Trump couldn&#039;t have stopped James Comey&#039;s testimony? What right-wing rag or propaganda television source is telling you this utter bullshit? 

Yes, Trump could have delayed Comey&#039;s testimony, but there is absolutely nothing that Trump could have done to stop Comey&#039;s testimony. 

The single most ignorant thing that Benedict Donald has done &lt;b&gt;in his capacity as President of the United States TO DATE&lt;/b&gt; {do not fail to note the qualifier in &lt;b&gt;bold&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;CAPS&lt;/b&gt;}: Firing James Comey! 

Mark the date in your history book: May 9, 2017. That date was the beginning of the end... seriously.  

Whatever right-wing propaganda or fringe bullshit that you&#039;re watching and/or reading where they&#039;re informing you that Trump could have stopped Comey, THEY ARE LYING TO YOU. 

&lt;i&gt;Unlike Odumbo who hid criminal activity behind Executive Privilege... &lt;/i&gt;

Okay, then... THEY ARE LYING TO YOU AND DEFLECTING. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
29</p>
<p><i>The mere fact that President Trump ALLOWED Comey to testify proves that there is just a big nothing-burger here... </i></p>
<p>How many times do you have to be told that Trump couldn't have stopped James Comey's testimony? What right-wing rag or propaganda television source is telling you this utter bullshit? </p>
<p>Yes, Trump could have delayed Comey's testimony, but there is absolutely nothing that Trump could have done to stop Comey's testimony. </p>
<p>The single most ignorant thing that Benedict Donald has done <b>in his capacity as President of the United States TO DATE</b> {do not fail to note the qualifier in <b>bold</b> and <b>CAPS</b>}: Firing James Comey! </p>
<p>Mark the date in your history book: May 9, 2017. That date was the beginning of the end... seriously.  </p>
<p>Whatever right-wing propaganda or fringe bullshit that you're watching and/or reading where they're informing you that Trump could have stopped Comey, THEY ARE LYING TO YOU. </p>
<p><i>Unlike Odumbo who hid criminal activity behind Executive Privilege... </i></p>
<p>Okay, then... THEY ARE LYING TO YOU AND DEFLECTING. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102011</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102011</guid>
		<description>Michale
9, 30

You had to post that twice for effect? *LOL*

I&#039;m guessing you didn&#039;t read too far into that article, right? Because if you actually had read it, you would have discovered this paragraph: 

&lt;b&gt;If you compare where each president stood at this point in the Gallup tracking poll, however, the two are deadlocked. The most recent Gallup survey pegged Trump&#039;s approval at 37 percent, the exact same figure the polling company found for Clinton in early June 1993. Trump&#039;s disapproval rating in the survey was far higher, however, outpacing Clinton at 57 percent to 49 percent. &lt;/b&gt;

Hmmmmm. So Clinton&#039;s approval ratings were about the same as Trump&#039;s depending on the poll or polling aggregate, the exact same in the Gallup poll, but Trump&#039;s disapproval rating was &lt;b&gt;FAR HIGHER&lt;/b&gt;. How come you left that part out? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
9, 30</p>
<p>You had to post that twice for effect? *LOL*</p>
<p>I'm guessing you didn't read too far into that article, right? Because if you actually had read it, you would have discovered this paragraph: </p>
<p><b>If you compare where each president stood at this point in the Gallup tracking poll, however, the two are deadlocked. The most recent Gallup survey pegged Trump's approval at 37 percent, the exact same figure the polling company found for Clinton in early June 1993. Trump's disapproval rating in the survey was far higher, however, outpacing Clinton at 57 percent to 49 percent. </b></p>
<p>Hmmmmm. So Clinton's approval ratings were about the same as Trump's depending on the poll or polling aggregate, the exact same in the Gallup poll, but Trump's disapproval rating was <b>FAR HIGHER</b>. How come you left that part out? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102010</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 23:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102010</guid>
		<description>Kick [44] &lt;i&gt;I heard that Eric Trump said on Hannity last night that Democrats who support the probe into his father&#039;s campaign and Russia are &quot;not even people.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Here&#039;s exactly what he said, from the official &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2017/06/06/circa-news-ex-intel-contractor-sues-comey-eric-trump-media-are-out-control.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fox transcript&lt;/a&gt;:

HANNITY: Don&#039;t you wish you went to Washington so you could be dealing with this every second of every day?

TRUMP: You know that? I&#039;ve never seen hatred like this. And to me, they&#039;re not even people. It&#039;s so, so sad. I mean, morality&#039;s just gone. Morals have flown out the window. We deserve so much better than this as a country.

HANNITY: You&#039;re right.  
------------------------------

Here I think Eric meant to say,&#039;they&#039;re not even &lt;i&gt;decent&lt;/i&gt; people&#039;, that is, meaning to say: they&#039;re deplorable. What came out of his mouth was far worse, which is why Eric isn&#039;t the Trump child with his own office in the White House.

Whether Eric was referring to Washingtonians, the WH press, the press in general, or Democrats depends on whether you assume he was answering to Hannity&#039;s prompt about D.C., or leading into his next statement, which led to a mini-rant about Democrats. I&#039;m leaning with the former.

Now contrast Trump&#039;s blanket condemnation of his father&#039;s enemies with Hillary&#039;s remarks, which she begins with the qualification that she &lt;i&gt;knows&lt;/i&gt; that what she is about to say is an exaggeration: 

&quot;You know, to &lt;b&gt;just be grossly generalistic&lt;/b&gt;, you could put half of Trump&#039;s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.&quot; (emphasis mine)

Replace the word &#039;half&#039; with the word &#039;some&#039;, and that&#039;s an empirically accurate statement. The word &#039;half&#039; is...what&#039;s the term?..a &lt;i&gt;gross generality&lt;/i&gt;. Too bad she didn&#039;t warn us about that....oh wait, she did.

This has been another episode of &lt;b&gt;&quot;I Know You Are But What Am I?&quot;  Thanks for playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick [44] <i>I heard that Eric Trump said on Hannity last night that Democrats who support the probe into his father's campaign and Russia are "not even people."</i></p>
<p>Here's exactly what he said, from the official <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2017/06/06/circa-news-ex-intel-contractor-sues-comey-eric-trump-media-are-out-control.html" rel="nofollow">Fox transcript</a>:</p>
<p>HANNITY: Don't you wish you went to Washington so you could be dealing with this every second of every day?</p>
<p>TRUMP: You know that? I've never seen hatred like this. And to me, they're not even people. It's so, so sad. I mean, morality's just gone. Morals have flown out the window. We deserve so much better than this as a country.</p>
<p>HANNITY: You're right.<br />
------------------------------</p>
<p>Here I think Eric meant to say,'they're not even <i>decent</i> people', that is, meaning to say: they're deplorable. What came out of his mouth was far worse, which is why Eric isn't the Trump child with his own office in the White House.</p>
<p>Whether Eric was referring to Washingtonians, the WH press, the press in general, or Democrats depends on whether you assume he was answering to Hannity's prompt about D.C., or leading into his next statement, which led to a mini-rant about Democrats. I'm leaning with the former.</p>
<p>Now contrast Trump's blanket condemnation of his father's enemies with Hillary's remarks, which she begins with the qualification that she <i>knows</i> that what she is about to say is an exaggeration: </p>
<p>"You know, to <b>just be grossly generalistic</b>, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up." (emphasis mine)</p>
<p>Replace the word 'half' with the word 'some', and that's an empirically accurate statement. The word 'half' is...what's the term?..a <i>gross generality</i>. Too bad she didn't warn us about that....oh wait, she did.</p>
<p>This has been another episode of <b>"I Know You Are But What Am I?"  Thanks for playing.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102009</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 23:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102009</guid>
		<description>Listen
42

&lt;i&gt;And if Trump knew he was being recorded in Russia, then he had to have something to do with Russia! Why else would he be recorded? &lt;/i&gt;

Recorded footage from a Moscow hotel... Trump talking about a &quot;relationship&quot; circa 2013:

https://youtu.be/Dn1ZK2kcfQ8?t=2s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen<br />
42</p>
<p><i>And if Trump knew he was being recorded in Russia, then he had to have something to do with Russia! Why else would he be recorded? </i></p>
<p>Recorded footage from a Moscow hotel... Trump talking about a "relationship" circa 2013:</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/Dn1ZK2kcfQ8?t=2s" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/Dn1ZK2kcfQ8?t=2s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102008</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102008</guid>
		<description>Listen
41

&lt;i&gt;Probably my favorite part of Comey&#039;s written statement had to be:

Creating written records immediately after one-on-one conversations with Mr. Trump was my practice from that point forward. This had not been my practice in the past. I spoke alone with President Obama twice in person (and never on the phone) – once in 2015 to discuss law enforcement policy issues and a second time, briefly, for him to say goodbye in late 2016.  &lt;/i&gt;

And we&#039;ll always have that time in the Rose Garden together, just me and BO and BM.

https://youtu.be/sraZtvTFeHo?t=4m23s

Mmmmm... Memories light the corners of my mind,
Misty water-colored memories of the way we were.
Scattered pictures of the smiles we left behind
Smiles we gave to one another for the way we were.
Can it be that it was all so simple then
Or has time rewritten every line?
If we had the chance to do it all again, tell me, would we, could we.........

Oh, sure we could..... Just one more time for old times&#039; sake. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen<br />
41</p>
<p><i>Probably my favorite part of Comey's written statement had to be:</p>
<p>Creating written records immediately after one-on-one conversations with Mr. Trump was my practice from that point forward. This had not been my practice in the past. I spoke alone with President Obama twice in person (and never on the phone) – once in 2015 to discuss law enforcement policy issues and a second time, briefly, for him to say goodbye in late 2016.  </i></p>
<p>And we'll always have that time in the Rose Garden together, just me and BO and BM.</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/sraZtvTFeHo?t=4m23s" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/sraZtvTFeHo?t=4m23s</a></p>
<p>Mmmmm... Memories light the corners of my mind,<br />
Misty water-colored memories of the way we were.<br />
Scattered pictures of the smiles we left behind<br />
Smiles we gave to one another for the way we were.<br />
Can it be that it was all so simple then<br />
Or has time rewritten every line?<br />
If we had the chance to do it all again, tell me, would we, could we.........</p>
<p>Oh, sure we could..... Just one more time for old times' sake. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102007</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102007</guid>
		<description>JL
43

Yes! Yes!  

Or perhaps:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzllVlzzeuo

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JL<br />
43</p>
<p>Yes! Yes!  </p>
<p>Or perhaps:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzllVlzzeuo" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzllVlzzeuo</a></p>
<p>;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102006</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102006</guid>
		<description>Balthasar
25

&lt;i&gt;Oh, I see. That&#039;s what they did wrong. They forgot that Trump doesn&#039;t read. They should have created a special video featuring FOX hosts explaining the rules, and mentioning Trump (along with appropriate praises like, &#039;the man with amazingly large hands&#039;) and preferably under three minutes long, including introduction. Slip it in during &#039;Fox and Friends&#039; in the morning, and voilà! he&#039;s informed. Sorta. &lt;/i&gt;

*LOL* Yes! And then, just for good measure, show it during &quot;The Five&quot; because Trump called Kimberly Guilfoyle about the climate agreement in the morning before he announced his decision to hear her thoughts. Word on the street is that she&#039;s gunning for Spicey&#039;s job, and Trump is phoning her. Who knows if it&#039;s true... considering the source being Fox News Entertainment Propaganda. 

Oh, and don&#039;t forget to run it during Hannity. I heard that Eric Trump said on Hannity last night that Democrats who support the probe into his father&#039;s campaign and Russia are &quot;not even people.&quot; Well, if that don&#039;t just blow the &quot;deplorables&quot; comment all to hell. Not. Even. People! 

Oh, where is the outrage from the righties about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar<br />
25</p>
<p><i>Oh, I see. That's what they did wrong. They forgot that Trump doesn't read. They should have created a special video featuring FOX hosts explaining the rules, and mentioning Trump (along with appropriate praises like, 'the man with amazingly large hands') and preferably under three minutes long, including introduction. Slip it in during 'Fox and Friends' in the morning, and voilà! he's informed. Sorta. </i></p>
<p>*LOL* Yes! And then, just for good measure, show it during "The Five" because Trump called Kimberly Guilfoyle about the climate agreement in the morning before he announced his decision to hear her thoughts. Word on the street is that she's gunning for Spicey's job, and Trump is phoning her. Who knows if it's true... considering the source being Fox News Entertainment Propaganda. </p>
<p>Oh, and don't forget to run it during Hannity. I heard that Eric Trump said on Hannity last night that Democrats who support the probe into his father's campaign and Russia are "not even people." Well, if that don't just blow the "deplorables" comment all to hell. Not. Even. People! </p>
<p>Oh, where is the outrage from the righties about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102005</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102005</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.”&lt;/i&gt;

perhaps...

https://youtu.be/T6QKqFPRZSA

:)
JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.”</i></p>
<p>perhaps...</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/T6QKqFPRZSA" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/T6QKqFPRZSA</a></p>
<p>:)<br />
JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102003</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102003</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;He said he had nothing to do with Russia, had not been involved with hookers in Russia, and had always assumed he was being recorded when in Russia.&lt;/b&gt;

Well, we now know the hookers story was true!  Make it rain!  Make it rain!

And if Trump knew he was being recorded in Russia, then he had to have something to do with Russia!   Why else would he be recorded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>He said he had nothing to do with Russia, had not been involved with hookers in Russia, and had always assumed he was being recorded when in Russia.</b></p>
<p>Well, we now know the hookers story was true!  Make it rain!  Make it rain!</p>
<p>And if Trump knew he was being recorded in Russia, then he had to have something to do with Russia!   Why else would he be recorded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102002</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102002</guid>
		<description>Probably my favorite part of Comey&#039;s written statement had to be:&lt;b&gt;

Creating written records immediately after one-on-one conversations with Mr. Trump was my practice from that point forward. This had not been my practice in the past. I spoke alone with President Obama twice in person (and never on the phone) – once in 2015 to discuss law enforcement policy issues and a second time, briefly, for him to say goodbye in late 2016. In neither of those circumstances did I memorialize the discussions. I can recall nine one-on-one conversations with President Trump in four months – three in person and six on the phone.&lt;/b&gt;

Even after Comey told the President that the proper way for him to contact the FBI was through the proper channels at the DOJ, Trump continued to call him directly!  

Then there was this last little gem:

&lt;i&gt;He said he would do that and added, &lt;b&gt;“Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.”&lt;/b&gt; I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.” &lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably my favorite part of Comey's written statement had to be:<b></p>
<p>Creating written records immediately after one-on-one conversations with Mr. Trump was my practice from that point forward. This had not been my practice in the past. I spoke alone with President Obama twice in person (and never on the phone) – once in 2015 to discuss law enforcement policy issues and a second time, briefly, for him to say goodbye in late 2016. In neither of those circumstances did I memorialize the discussions. I can recall nine one-on-one conversations with President Trump in four months – three in person and six on the phone.</b></p>
<p>Even after Comey told the President that the proper way for him to contact the FBI was through the proper channels at the DOJ, Trump continued to call him directly!  </p>
<p>Then there was this last little gem:</p>
<p><i>He said he would do that and added, <b>“Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.”</b> I did not reply or ask him what he meant by “that thing.” </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102001</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102001</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why would Sessions give Comey a scared Bilbo look if Sessions wasn&#039;t even there?&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, Sessions does that look all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why would Sessions give Comey a scared Bilbo look if Sessions wasn't even there?</i></p>
<p>Oh, Sessions does that look all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-102000</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-102000</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And what&#039;s your cite for that information?&lt;/i&gt;

Nearly every news outlet in the world, many of which printed the document in full - except for FOX news, of course, which printed only &#039;talking points&#039;.

But yeah, a short google search yields the entire text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And what's your cite for that information?</i></p>
<p>Nearly every news outlet in the world, many of which printed the document in full - except for FOX news, of course, which printed only 'talking points'.</p>
<p>But yeah, a short google search yields the entire text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101999</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101999</guid>
		<description>You people just make shit up and then whine and cry when I point out the FACT that ya&#039;all have no credibility...

Jeeesh....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people just make shit up and then whine and cry when I point out the FACT that ya'all have no credibility...</p>
<p>Jeeesh....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101998</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101998</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As was my practice for conversations with President Trump, I wrote a detailed memo about the dinner immediately afterwards and shared it with the senior leadership team of the FBI.&lt;/I&gt;

Why would Sessions give Comey a scared Bilbo look if Sessions wasn&#039;t even there???

You see what I mean?

Your claims are complete and utter bullshit from the word go...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As was my practice for conversations with President Trump, I wrote a detailed memo about the dinner immediately afterwards and shared it with the senior leadership team of the FBI.</i></p>
<p>Why would Sessions give Comey a scared Bilbo look if Sessions wasn't even there???</p>
<p>You see what I mean?</p>
<p>Your claims are complete and utter bullshit from the word go...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101997</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101997</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And yet, Trump is a successful businessman that even OBAMA wanted to be like..&lt;/i&gt;

You DO know that repeating a thing over and over doesn&#039;t make it true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And yet, Trump is a successful businessman that even OBAMA wanted to be like..</i></p>
<p>You DO know that repeating a thing over and over doesn't make it true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101996</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101996</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;That paragraph is my words, not Comey&#039;s. The rest of the bolded text is from Comey&#039;s testimony.&lt;/I&gt;

In other words, total and complete bullshit...

Your interpretation based SOLELY and COMPLETELY on your Party bigotry..

That&#039;s what I thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That paragraph is my words, not Comey's. The rest of the bolded text is from Comey's testimony.</i></p>
<p>In other words, total and complete bullshit...</p>
<p>Your interpretation based SOLELY and COMPLETELY on your Party bigotry..</p>
<p>That's what I thought...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101995</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101995</guid>
		<description>And what&#039;s your cite for that information???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what's your cite for that information???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101994</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101994</guid>
		<description>What he got back was Sessions&#039; &#039;scared Bilbo&#039; look, and nothing more. When later, Trump cleared the room after a briefing to again buttonhole Comey, Comey took Sessions to task for allowing it:

That paragraph is my words, not Comey&#039;s. The rest of the bolded text is from Comey&#039;s testimony.

Just to be clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What he got back was Sessions' 'scared Bilbo' look, and nothing more. When later, Trump cleared the room after a briefing to again buttonhole Comey, Comey took Sessions to task for allowing it:</p>
<p>That paragraph is my words, not Comey's. The rest of the bolded text is from Comey's testimony.</p>
<p>Just to be clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101993</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101993</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If it WAS clear and overt pressure, then Comey failed in his duty to immediately inform the AG..&lt;/i&gt;

He did:

&lt;b&gt;As was my practice for conversations with President Trump, I wrote a detailed memo about the dinner immediately afterwards and shared it with the senior leadership team of the FBI.&lt;/i&gt;

What he got back was Sessions&#039; &#039;scared Bilbo&#039; look, and nothing more. When later, Trump cleared the room after a briefing to again buttonhole Comey, Comey took Sessions to task for allowing it:

&lt;b&gt; I took the opportunity to implore the Attorney General to prevent any future direct communication between the President and me. I told the AG that what had just happened – him being asked to leave while the FBI Director, who reports to the AG, remained behind – was inappropriate and should never happen. He did not reply.&lt;/b&gt;

Sessions recused himself from the investigation shortly thereafter. His successor, at Trump&#039;s request, wrote a memo of bullshit reasons that Comey could be fired, which was used as the excuse for firing Comey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If it WAS clear and overt pressure, then Comey failed in his duty to immediately inform the AG..</i></p>
<p>He did:</p>
<p><b>As was my practice for conversations with President Trump, I wrote a detailed memo about the dinner immediately afterwards and shared it with the senior leadership team of the FBI.</p>
<p>What he got back was Sessions' 'scared Bilbo' look, and nothing more. When later, Trump cleared the room after a briefing to again buttonhole Comey, Comey took Sessions to task for allowing it:</p>
<p></b><b> I took the opportunity to implore the Attorney General to prevent any future direct communication between the President and me. I told the AG that what had just happened – him being asked to leave while the FBI Director, who reports to the AG, remained behind – was inappropriate and should never happen. He did not reply.</b></p>
<p>Sessions recused himself from the investigation shortly thereafter. His successor, at Trump's request, wrote a memo of bullshit reasons that Comey could be fired, which was used as the excuse for firing Comey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101992</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101992</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;You can&#039;t win!  I&#039;ve got god on my side!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Leland Gant, NEEDFUL THINGS

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"You can't win!  I've got god on my side!!!"</b><br />
-Leland Gant, NEEDFUL THINGS</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101991</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101991</guid>
		<description>And, oh yea...

Trump&#039;s approval rating is BETTER than Bill Clinton&#039;s was at this point in his presidency..

OUCH!!!!!  That&#039;s GOTTA hurt!!!!   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, oh yea...</p>
<p>Trump's approval rating is BETTER than Bill Clinton's was at this point in his presidency..</p>
<p>OUCH!!!!!  That's GOTTA hurt!!!!   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101990</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101990</guid>
		<description>The mere fact that President Trump ALLOWED Comey to testify proves that there is just a big nothing-burger here...

Unlike Odumbo who hid criminal activity behind Executive Privilege...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mere fact that President Trump ALLOWED Comey to testify proves that there is just a big nothing-burger here...</p>
<p>Unlike Odumbo who hid criminal activity behind Executive Privilege...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101989</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101989</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Oh, I see. That&#039;s what they did wrong. They forgot that Trump doesn&#039;t read. They should have created a special video featuring FOX hosts explaining the rules, and mentioning Trump (along with appropriate praises like, &#039;the man with amazingly large hands&#039;) and preferably under three minutes long, including introduction. Slip it in during &#039;Fox and Friends&#039; in the morning, and voilà! he&#039;s informed. Sorta.&lt;/I&gt;

And yet, Trump is a successful businessman that even OBAMA wanted to be like..

And, oh yea.... Trump TOTALLY and UNEQUIVOCALLY &lt;B&gt;*DEVASTATED*&lt;/B&gt; yer chosen hero and champion!!!  

BBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So, if Trump is as bad as ya&#039;all claim, that makes NOT-45 20 times WORSE for LOSING to Trump!!!!

:D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Simple logic&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Admiral James T Kirk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh, I see. That's what they did wrong. They forgot that Trump doesn't read. They should have created a special video featuring FOX hosts explaining the rules, and mentioning Trump (along with appropriate praises like, 'the man with amazingly large hands') and preferably under three minutes long, including introduction. Slip it in during 'Fox and Friends' in the morning, and voilà! he's informed. Sorta.</i></p>
<p>And yet, Trump is a successful businessman that even OBAMA wanted to be like..</p>
<p>And, oh yea.... Trump TOTALLY and UNEQUIVOCALLY <b>*DEVASTATED*</b> yer chosen hero and champion!!!  </p>
<p>BBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>So, if Trump is as bad as ya'all claim, that makes NOT-45 20 times WORSE for LOSING to Trump!!!!</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p><b>"Simple logic"</b><br />
-Admiral James T Kirk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101986</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101986</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Comey said he “could be wrong” about that interpretation of Trump’s comments. &lt;/B&gt;

Reasonable doubt..

Face it, people..  Ya&#039;all got nothing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Comey said he “could be wrong” about that interpretation of Trump’s comments. </b></p>
<p>Reasonable doubt..</p>
<p>Face it, people..  Ya'all got nothing....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101985</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101985</guid>
		<description>So, what ya are saying is that there will be BOMBSHELLS tomorrow, right!??   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what ya are saying is that there will be BOMBSHELLS tomorrow, right!??   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101984</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101984</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;there are simply no excuses for what Trump has done. He was given a list of the rules; they all were.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, I see. That&#039;s what they did wrong. They forgot that Trump doesn&#039;t read.  They should have created a special video featuring FOX hosts explaining the rules, and mentioning Trump (along with appropriate praises like, &#039;the man with amazingly large hands&#039;) and preferably under three minutes long, including introduction. Slip it in during &#039;Fox and Friends&#039; in the morning, and voilà! he&#039;s informed. Sorta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>there are simply no excuses for what Trump has done. He was given a list of the rules; they all were.</i></p>
<p>Oh, I see. That's what they did wrong. They forgot that Trump doesn't read.  They should have created a special video featuring FOX hosts explaining the rules, and mentioning Trump (along with appropriate praises like, 'the man with amazingly large hands') and preferably under three minutes long, including introduction. Slip it in during 'Fox and Friends' in the morning, and voilà! he's informed. Sorta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101983</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101983</guid>
		<description>Balthasar

&lt;i&gt;Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe &lt;/i&gt;

So they weren&#039;t &quot;pressured,&quot; right? But the standard isn&#039;t whether or not they happened to feel any pressure. The standard is whether someone attempted to pressure them... and they knew the rules (see memo at link above).

Think back to the early news coming out of the White House about the Trump administration trying to influence senior members of the IC... remember?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-sought-to-enlist-intelligence-officials-key-lawmakers-to-counter-russia-stories/2017/02/24/c8487552-fa99-11e6-be05-1a3817ac21a5_story.html?utm_term=.f2c8402fbec2

&lt;b&gt;The Trump administration has enlisted senior members of the intelligence community and Congress in efforts to counter news stories about Trump associates’ ties to Russia, a politically charged issue that has been under investigation by the FBI as well as lawmakers now defending the White House.

Acting at the behest of the White House, the officials made calls to news organizations last week in attempts to challenge stories about alleged contacts between members of President Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, U.S. officials said.

The calls were orchestrated by the White House after unsuccessful attempts by the administration to get senior FBI officials to speak with news organizations and dispute the accuracy of stories on the alleged contacts with Russia. &lt;/b&gt;

Wonder what old Reince is up to right about now? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar</p>
<p><i>Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe </i></p>
<p>So they weren't "pressured," right? But the standard isn't whether or not they happened to feel any pressure. The standard is whether someone attempted to pressure them... and they knew the rules (see memo at link above).</p>
<p>Think back to the early news coming out of the White House about the Trump administration trying to influence senior members of the IC... remember?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-sought-to-enlist-intelligence-officials-key-lawmakers-to-counter-russia-stories/2017/02/24/c8487552-fa99-11e6-be05-1a3817ac21a5_story.html?utm_term=.f2c8402fbec2" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-sought-to-enlist-intelligence-officials-key-lawmakers-to-counter-russia-stories/2017/02/24/c8487552-fa99-11e6-be05-1a3817ac21a5_story.html?utm_term=.f2c8402fbec2</a></p>
<p><b>The Trump administration has enlisted senior members of the intelligence community and Congress in efforts to counter news stories about Trump associates’ ties to Russia, a politically charged issue that has been under investigation by the FBI as well as lawmakers now defending the White House.</p>
<p>Acting at the behest of the White House, the officials made calls to news organizations last week in attempts to challenge stories about alleged contacts between members of President Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, U.S. officials said.</p>
<p>The calls were orchestrated by the White House after unsuccessful attempts by the administration to get senior FBI officials to speak with news organizations and dispute the accuracy of stories on the alleged contacts with Russia. </b></p>
<p>Wonder what old Reince is up to right about now? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101982</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101982</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Doesn&#039;t matter. Comey&#039;s testimony (his opening statement just released) details clear and overt pressure from Trump to shut down the investigation and/or steer the investigation away from Trump and Flynn.&lt;/I&gt;

BBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

&lt;B&gt;“I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go,”&lt;/B&gt;

THAT is clear and overt pressure???  :D  

Yer a funny guy...

Here&#039;s the thing...

If it WAS clear and overt pressure, then Comey failed in his duty to immediately inform the AG....

You guys are grasping at straws and it&#039;s sad to watch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Doesn't matter. Comey's testimony (his opening statement just released) details clear and overt pressure from Trump to shut down the investigation and/or steer the investigation away from Trump and Flynn.</i></p>
<p>BBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p><b>“I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go,”</b></p>
<p>THAT is clear and overt pressure???  :D  </p>
<p>Yer a funny guy...</p>
<p>Here's the thing...</p>
<p>If it WAS clear and overt pressure, then Comey failed in his duty to immediately inform the AG....</p>
<p>You guys are grasping at straws and it's sad to watch...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101981</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101981</guid>
		<description>Balthasar
21

&lt;i&gt;Interestingly, according to Comey, Trump&#039;s entire focus in these conversations was Himself, and Flynn. He apparently didn&#039;t attempt to shield his son-in-law, Sessions, Manafort, Page, or others who&#039;d by then admitted to having contact with the Russians, referring to them only as &#039;satellites&#039;. &lt;/i&gt;

Comey is a great note taker. He made a brilliant move when he requested that his testimony be released to the public on Wednesday; it was what Comey wanted. He also wants all his notes released to the public. He&#039;s got nothing to hide. 

I&#039;d love to be a fly on the wall in the White House right about now. Seriously. If the Republicans keep asking about the &quot;leaks&quot;... the &quot;leaks&quot;... the &quot;leaks&quot; and get snoopy about finding the leakers, they&#039;re going to sure as hell be screaming &quot;fake news&quot;... &quot;fake news&quot;... if they put some of these journalists on the witness stand because many of these leaks come straight out of the White House... the different factions leaking information on each other. So they seriously don&#039;t want to go there. 

And there are simply no excuses for what Trump has done. He was given a list of the rules; they all were. Read them and weep:

http://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015a-dde8-d23c-a7ff-dfef4d530000

No excuses. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar<br />
21</p>
<p><i>Interestingly, according to Comey, Trump's entire focus in these conversations was Himself, and Flynn. He apparently didn't attempt to shield his son-in-law, Sessions, Manafort, Page, or others who'd by then admitted to having contact with the Russians, referring to them only as 'satellites'. </i></p>
<p>Comey is a great note taker. He made a brilliant move when he requested that his testimony be released to the public on Wednesday; it was what Comey wanted. He also wants all his notes released to the public. He's got nothing to hide. </p>
<p>I'd love to be a fly on the wall in the White House right about now. Seriously. If the Republicans keep asking about the "leaks"... the "leaks"... the "leaks" and get snoopy about finding the leakers, they're going to sure as hell be screaming "fake news"... "fake news"... if they put some of these journalists on the witness stand because many of these leaks come straight out of the White House... the different factions leaking information on each other. So they seriously don't want to go there. </p>
<p>And there are simply no excuses for what Trump has done. He was given a list of the rules; they all were. Read them and weep:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015a-dde8-d23c-a7ff-dfef4d530000" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015a-dde8-d23c-a7ff-dfef4d530000</a></p>
<p>No excuses. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101978</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 19:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101978</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, according to Comey, Trump&#039;s entire focus in these conversations was Himself, and Flynn. He apparently didn&#039;t attempt to shield his son-in-law, Sessions, Manafort, Page, or others who&#039;d by then admitted to having contact with the Russians, referring to them only as &#039;satellites&#039;.

So when he says to Comey, &quot;I need loyalty&quot;, he doesn&#039;t apparently think that&#039;s a two-way street, unless it amounts to &#039;and in return you get to keep your job&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, according to Comey, Trump's entire focus in these conversations was Himself, and Flynn. He apparently didn't attempt to shield his son-in-law, Sessions, Manafort, Page, or others who'd by then admitted to having contact with the Russians, referring to them only as 'satellites'.</p>
<p>So when he says to Comey, "I need loyalty", he doesn't apparently think that's a two-way street, unless it amounts to 'and in return you get to keep your job'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101977</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 19:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101977</guid>
		<description>Michale
7

&lt;i&gt;So, the chances of President Trump being forced from office over these totally fact-less accusations is slim and none and Slim just logged off.. &lt;/i&gt;

You just keep telling yourself that. Whatever allows you to sleep at night. Slim hasn&#039;t logged off; Slim is the Dread Pirate Roberts. 

&lt;b&gt;Westley: I myself am often surprised at life&#039;s little quirks. You see, what I told you before about saying &quot;please&quot; was true. It intrigued Roberts, as did my descriptions of your beauty. Finally, Roberts decided something. He said, &quot;All right, Westley, I&#039;ve never had a valet. You can try it for tonight. I&#039;ll most likely kill you in the morning.&quot; Three years he said that. &quot;Good night, Westley. Good work. Sleep well. I&#039;ll most likely kill you in the morning.&quot; It was a fine time for me. I was learning to fence, to fight, anything anyone would teach me. And Roberts and I eventually became friends. And then it happened.

Buttercup: What? Go on.

Westley: Well, Roberts had grown so rich, he wanted to retire. So he took me to his cabin and told me his secret: &quot;I am not the Dread Pirate Roberts,&quot; he said. &quot;My name is Ryan. I inherited this ship from the previous Dread Pirate Roberts, just as you will inherit it from me. The man I inherited it from was not the real Dread Pirate Roberts, either. His name was Cummerbund. The real Roberts has been retired fifteen years and living like a king in Patagonia.&quot; &lt;/b&gt;

But since we&#039;re talking Russia here, a better description would probably be perestroika dolls! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
7</p>
<p><i>So, the chances of President Trump being forced from office over these totally fact-less accusations is slim and none and Slim just logged off.. </i></p>
<p>You just keep telling yourself that. Whatever allows you to sleep at night. Slim hasn't logged off; Slim is the Dread Pirate Roberts. </p>
<p><b>Westley: I myself am often surprised at life's little quirks. You see, what I told you before about saying "please" was true. It intrigued Roberts, as did my descriptions of your beauty. Finally, Roberts decided something. He said, "All right, Westley, I've never had a valet. You can try it for tonight. I'll most likely kill you in the morning." Three years he said that. "Good night, Westley. Good work. Sleep well. I'll most likely kill you in the morning." It was a fine time for me. I was learning to fence, to fight, anything anyone would teach me. And Roberts and I eventually became friends. And then it happened.</p>
<p>Buttercup: What? Go on.</p>
<p>Westley: Well, Roberts had grown so rich, he wanted to retire. So he took me to his cabin and told me his secret: "I am not the Dread Pirate Roberts," he said. "My name is Ryan. I inherited this ship from the previous Dread Pirate Roberts, just as you will inherit it from me. The man I inherited it from was not the real Dread Pirate Roberts, either. His name was Cummerbund. The real Roberts has been retired fifteen years and living like a king in Patagonia." </b></p>
<p>But since we're talking Russia here, a better description would probably be perestroika dolls! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101976</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 19:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101976</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe&lt;/i&gt;

What they did was refuse to answer the question directly in public. What they&#039;ll say in closed session is a different matter.

Doesn&#039;t matter. Comey&#039;s testimony (his opening statement just released) details clear and overt pressure from Trump to shut down the investigation and/or steer the investigation away from Trump and Flynn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe</i></p>
<p>What they did was refuse to answer the question directly in public. What they'll say in closed session is a different matter.</p>
<p>Doesn't matter. Comey's testimony (his opening statement just released) details clear and overt pressure from Trump to shut down the investigation and/or steer the investigation away from Trump and Flynn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101975</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 18:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101975</guid>
		<description>Did I mention that Director Comey was going to release his written testimony while the Wednesday hearing was going on? It&#039;s great reading... a real &quot;bombshell,&quot; if you know what I mean. 

WHOOP:  There it is! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I mention that Director Comey was going to release his written testimony while the Wednesday hearing was going on? It's great reading... a real "bombshell," if you know what I mean. </p>
<p>WHOOP:  There it is! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101968</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 17:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101968</guid>
		<description>WOOO  WOOOOO WOOOOOOO   

&lt;B&gt;BOMBSHELL ALERT!!!

Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe&lt;/B&gt;
http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/07/top-intel-community-officials-deny-that-trump-pressured-them-on-russia-probe/


What&#039;s that sound????

pppppppppffffffffffffffffffffffffftttttttttttttttttttt

That&#039;s all the air deflating your hysterical anti-Trump crusade....  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;The only bad air around here is you guys fartin&#039; around!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Richard Dreyfuss, CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND

:D

#Resistance my ass!   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOOO  WOOOOO WOOOOOOO   </p>
<p><b>BOMBSHELL ALERT!!!</p>
<p>Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe</b><br />
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/07/top-intel-community-officials-deny-that-trump-pressured-them-on-russia-probe/" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/07/top-intel-community-officials-deny-that-trump-pressured-them-on-russia-probe/</a></p>
<p>What's that sound????</p>
<p>pppppppppffffffffffffffffffffffffftttttttttttttttttttt</p>
<p>That's all the air deflating your hysterical anti-Trump crusade....  :D</p>
<p><b>"The only bad air around here is you guys fartin' around!!!"</b><br />
-Richard Dreyfuss, CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>#Resistance my ass!   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101957</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101957</guid>
		<description>MS,

&lt;I&gt;Who here has said there will be bombshells? &lt;/I&gt;

Victoria has promised us &quot;bombshells&quot; from the hearings going on today..  So far the only &quot;bombshell&quot; has been that President Trump hasn&#039;t interfered in any FBI or DOJ investigation..

&lt;I&gt;Who here has said there will be WWIII? &lt;/I&gt;

The entirety of the Left Wingery including many here in Weigantia, up to and including you, if I am not mistaken...

I can provide the links if I thought for a second you would concede the point....

&lt;I&gt;Who here is hysterical about Trump?&lt;/I&gt;

The ones who go on and on about a nonsensical word...  The ones who take any anonymous source against Trump as gospel. The ones who attack Trump because he took 2 scoops of ice cream when everyone else had 1..

In short, the entirety of the Left Wingery including the majority here...

&lt;I&gt;Try rational argument for a change.&lt;/I&gt;

I have.. I asked for ANY facts to support ya&#039;all&#039;s hysterical accusations... All I got back was personal attacks and name-calling..

Here&#039;s a thought for ya&#039;all..

If ya&#039;all want RATIONAL arguments, try for just ONE second, to be RATIONAL....

Quit screaming hysterically about nonsensical words and phantom Russian collusion and non-existent back channels and join the real world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS,</p>
<p><i>Who here has said there will be bombshells? </i></p>
<p>Victoria has promised us "bombshells" from the hearings going on today..  So far the only "bombshell" has been that President Trump hasn't interfered in any FBI or DOJ investigation..</p>
<p><i>Who here has said there will be WWIII? </i></p>
<p>The entirety of the Left Wingery including many here in Weigantia, up to and including you, if I am not mistaken...</p>
<p>I can provide the links if I thought for a second you would concede the point....</p>
<p><i>Who here is hysterical about Trump?</i></p>
<p>The ones who go on and on about a nonsensical word...  The ones who take any anonymous source against Trump as gospel. The ones who attack Trump because he took 2 scoops of ice cream when everyone else had 1..</p>
<p>In short, the entirety of the Left Wingery including the majority here...</p>
<p><i>Try rational argument for a change.</i></p>
<p>I have.. I asked for ANY facts to support ya'all's hysterical accusations... All I got back was personal attacks and name-calling..</p>
<p>Here's a thought for ya'all..</p>
<p>If ya'all want RATIONAL arguments, try for just ONE second, to be RATIONAL....</p>
<p>Quit screaming hysterically about nonsensical words and phantom Russian collusion and non-existent back channels and join the real world...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mopshell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101950</link>
		<dc:creator>Mopshell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 16:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101950</guid>
		<description>Michale - 

Who here has said there will be bombshells? Who here has said there will be WWIII? Who here is hysterical about Trump?

YOU!

You are the &lt;i&gt;only one&lt;/i&gt; going on and on and tediously on in hysterical, hyperbolic rants. I get that it&#039;s all frantic distraction but jeez, give it a rest. Try rational argument for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale - </p>
<p>Who here has said there will be bombshells? Who here has said there will be WWIII? Who here is hysterical about Trump?</p>
<p>YOU!</p>
<p>You are the <i>only one</i> going on and on and tediously on in hysterical, hyperbolic rants. I get that it's all frantic distraction but jeez, give it a rest. Try rational argument for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101942</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101942</guid>
		<description>On another note..

Where are the bombshells!!!????

We were promised bombshells!!!!

Where are they!!????

I guess it&#039;s just another hysterical Trump hater talking out of their asses again.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another note..</p>
<p>Where are the bombshells!!!????</p>
<p>We were promised bombshells!!!!</p>
<p>Where are they!!????</p>
<p>I guess it's just another hysterical Trump hater talking out of their asses again.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101941</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101941</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I knew that was coming. I just knew.&lt;/i&gt;

I am just pointing out the Democrat Party line prior to Comey&#039;s firing...

If you don&#039;t like the hypocrisy then quite being so damn hypocritical....

It&#039;s not rocket science...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I knew that was coming. I just knew.</i></p>
<p>I am just pointing out the Democrat Party line prior to Comey's firing...</p>
<p>If you don't like the hypocrisy then quite being so damn hypocritical....</p>
<p>It's not rocket science...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101940</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101940</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Comey&#039;s credibility problem mirrors the Democrats credibility problem quite closely..&lt;/i&gt;

I knew that was coming. I just knew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Comey's credibility problem mirrors the Democrats credibility problem quite closely..</i></p>
<p>I knew that was coming. I just knew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101929</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101929</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;James Comey&#039;s credibility problem&lt;/B&gt;
http://theweek.com/articles/703539/james-comeys-credibility-problem


Comey&#039;s credibility problem mirrors the Democrats credibility problem quite closely...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>James Comey's credibility problem</b><br />
<a href="http://theweek.com/articles/703539/james-comeys-credibility-problem" rel="nofollow">http://theweek.com/articles/703539/james-comeys-credibility-problem</a></p>
<p>Comey's credibility problem mirrors the Democrats credibility problem quite closely...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101927</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101927</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a mistake to read too much into brief intervals. As I see it, the first order trend is that Trump&#039;s popularity has declined over his first 4 months in office.  The second order trend is that the rate of his decline has tended to diminished over that period. 

Trump&#039;s popularity has gone flat in the last few weeks?  I don&#039;t think the trend should be ground that fine.  Looking at the RCP running average plot, I notice the current couple of flat-ish weeks doesn&#039;t look much different than the flat-sh weeks in Feb. and April. There is a lot of noise in these plots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it's a mistake to read too much into brief intervals. As I see it, the first order trend is that Trump's popularity has declined over his first 4 months in office.  The second order trend is that the rate of his decline has tended to diminished over that period. </p>
<p>Trump's popularity has gone flat in the last few weeks?  I don't think the trend should be ground that fine.  Looking at the RCP running average plot, I notice the current couple of flat-ish weeks doesn't look much different than the flat-sh weeks in Feb. and April. There is a lot of noise in these plots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101926</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101926</guid>
		<description>Yooooooo hoooooooooo ...

&lt;B&gt;DONALD TRUMP&#039;S APPROVAL RATING IS BETTER THAN BILL CLINTON&#039;S AT THIS POINT IN HIS FIRST TERM&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-approval-rating-better-bill-clintons-first-term-621853

Let the &quot;but!!!  but!!!  but!!!  That&#039;s different!!!&quot;s begin...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yooooooo hoooooooooo ...</p>
<p><b>DONALD TRUMP'S APPROVAL RATING IS BETTER THAN BILL CLINTON'S AT THIS POINT IN HIS FIRST TERM</b><br />
<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-approval-rating-better-bill-clintons-first-term-621853" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-approval-rating-better-bill-clintons-first-term-621853</a></p>
<p>Let the "but!!!  but!!!  but!!!  That's different!!!"s begin...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101914</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101914</guid>
		<description>http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/06/opinions/europe-closer-to-trump-on-terror-than-you-think-stanley/index.html

If ya&#039;all could get past the hysteria of ya&#039;all&#039;s anti-Trump zealotry, you would see the logic of Trump&#039;s position vis a vis immigration and counter-terrorism...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/06/opinions/europe-closer-to-trump-on-terror-than-you-think-stanley/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/06/opinions/europe-closer-to-trump-on-terror-than-you-think-stanley/index.html</a></p>
<p>If ya'all could get past the hysteria of ya'all's anti-Trump zealotry, you would see the logic of Trump's position vis a vis immigration and counter-terrorism...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101904</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 09:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101904</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;You just keep telling yourself that. Whatever allows you to sleep at night...

Heh.&lt;/I&gt;

Touche&#039;  :D

But as BAD as my track record is on SCOTUS predictions, it&#039;s PHENOMENALLY accurate on Trump predictions..

You must concede that...

So, the chances of President Trump being forced from office over these totally fact-less accusations is slim and none and Slim just logged off..

Now, if YOU want to tell yourself different so YOU can sleep at night??  :D  Who am I to stand in the way of a good night&#039;s sleep...  heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You just keep telling yourself that. Whatever allows you to sleep at night...</p>
<p>Heh.</i></p>
<p>Touche'  :D</p>
<p>But as BAD as my track record is on SCOTUS predictions, it's PHENOMENALLY accurate on Trump predictions..</p>
<p>You must concede that...</p>
<p>So, the chances of President Trump being forced from office over these totally fact-less accusations is slim and none and Slim just logged off..</p>
<p>Now, if YOU want to tell yourself different so YOU can sleep at night??  :D  Who am I to stand in the way of a good night's sleep...  heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101903</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 09:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101903</guid>
		<description>But I honestly understand why ya&#039;all are so hysterical about President Trump..

When ya&#039;all elevate the slightest whiff of an issue to the point of &lt;B&gt;&quot;OH MY GODS, IT&#039;S WORLD WAR III!!!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt; it allows ya&#039;all to forget how utterly and totally decimated your own Party is...  And it allows ya&#039;all to actually BELIEVE ya&#039;all&#039;s fantasies that the American people are really on your side...

So, I get it.. I really do...

I&#039;ll try to be a little more compassionate regarding the hurt and utter despair ya&#039;all feel...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I honestly understand why ya'all are so hysterical about President Trump..</p>
<p>When ya'all elevate the slightest whiff of an issue to the point of <b>"OH MY GODS, IT'S WORLD WAR III!!!!!"</b> it allows ya'all to forget how utterly and totally decimated your own Party is...  And it allows ya'all to actually BELIEVE ya'all's fantasies that the American people are really on your side...</p>
<p>So, I get it.. I really do...</p>
<p>I'll try to be a little more compassionate regarding the hurt and utter despair ya'all feel...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101900</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 09:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101900</guid>
		<description>michale -

You just keep telling yourself that.  Whatever allows you to sleep at night...

Heh.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale -</p>
<p>You just keep telling yourself that.  Whatever allows you to sleep at night...</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101892</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 09:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101892</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Maybe, maybe not. Comey&#039;s been known for holding things back (like that hospital story under Bush) until his actual testimony. So, at this point, I see it as about 50/50 whether we get a nothingburger or a shocking revelation from Comey. I have no idea which way it&#039;ll go -- could go either way, at this point....&lt;/I&gt;

Oh, it&#039;s already been established that there WILL be a &quot;bombshell&quot; this week....  :D

It will likely be that Trump used the word &#039;argutwoeif&#039; or had THREE scoops of ice cream..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;OH MY GOD, WHAT A FUCKING NIGHTMARE!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Marisa Tomeii, MY COUSIN VINNY

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Maybe, maybe not. Comey's been known for holding things back (like that hospital story under Bush) until his actual testimony. So, at this point, I see it as about 50/50 whether we get a nothingburger or a shocking revelation from Comey. I have no idea which way it'll go -- could go either way, at this point....</i></p>
<p>Oh, it's already been established that there WILL be a "bombshell" this week....  :D</p>
<p>It will likely be that Trump used the word 'argutwoeif' or had THREE scoops of ice cream..</p>
<p><b>"OH MY GOD, WHAT A FUCKING NIGHTMARE!!!"</b><br />
-Marisa Tomeii, MY COUSIN VINNY</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101848</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 07:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101848</guid>
		<description>nypoet22 -

Nixon went on TV to proclaim he was not a crook.  Reagan went on TV and admitted that he had lied to the American people.  Maybe that&#039;s the difference?  At this point, I have no real idea, it&#039;s just a random thought.

Also, Reagan had a whole industry behind pushing the narrative that he was the GOP&#039;s &quot;Saint Ronald of Reagan&quot; -- which was largely successful.  See the book &quot;Tear Down This Myth&quot; (I forget by whom, sorry).

Reagan&#039;s mythos rose exponentially AFTER he left office.  Not during, and not when he actually left office.  

I have to say, I&#039;ve been wondering whether there&#039;ll be a similar effort for Trump.  Will people, 25 years from now, be pushing the line that &quot;Trump was one of our greatest presidents&quot;???

I have to say I don&#039;t know, but it wouldn&#039;t surprise me a bit, after what happened with Reagan.

Balthasar -

Maybe, maybe not.  Comey&#039;s been known for holding things back (like that hospital story under Bush) until his actual testimony.  So, at this point, I see it as about 50/50 whether we get a nothingburger or a shocking revelation from Comey.  I have no idea which way it&#039;ll go -- could go either way, at this point....

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nypoet22 -</p>
<p>Nixon went on TV to proclaim he was not a crook.  Reagan went on TV and admitted that he had lied to the American people.  Maybe that's the difference?  At this point, I have no real idea, it's just a random thought.</p>
<p>Also, Reagan had a whole industry behind pushing the narrative that he was the GOP's "Saint Ronald of Reagan" -- which was largely successful.  See the book "Tear Down This Myth" (I forget by whom, sorry).</p>
<p>Reagan's mythos rose exponentially AFTER he left office.  Not during, and not when he actually left office.  </p>
<p>I have to say, I've been wondering whether there'll be a similar effort for Trump.  Will people, 25 years from now, be pushing the line that "Trump was one of our greatest presidents"???</p>
<p>I have to say I don't know, but it wouldn't surprise me a bit, after what happened with Reagan.</p>
<p>Balthasar -</p>
<p>Maybe, maybe not.  Comey's been known for holding things back (like that hospital story under Bush) until his actual testimony.  So, at this point, I see it as about 50/50 whether we get a nothingburger or a shocking revelation from Comey.  I have no idea which way it'll go -- could go either way, at this point....</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101847</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101847</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Comey will move the needle at all, even if he produces a note in Trump&#039;s handwriting that says &#039;kill the investigation&#039;. The alt-right has already discounted anything Comey has to say, and Trump loyalists are happy to follow suit.

And, as you say, Comey&#039;s testimony could turn out to be a big nothingburger. Comey has a reputation, though, for making news with his testimony. Will he break his streak and be boring for a change?

Clear testimony that Trump might have tried to influence Comey could embolden Democratic Senators and Reps to keep the heat on high, however, which will affect all of the OTHER things they want to do and have to do this year, including possible runs at healthcare and tax cuts by the republicans, and the unavoidable vote, for instance, to raise the debt ceiling.

Or to put it another way, as long as the bad headlines are about Trump for the next year and a half or so, Democratic congressmen and Senators won&#039;t worry as much about keeping their seats in the midterms and vote accordingly, while many Republicans will be forced to hedge their bets on every vote out of fear of being lashed to a sinking ship.

The Ship of Fool is already leaky and unsteady. Some of that is due to the inexperience of its crew, and that will almost certainly improve even with Captain Blighted at the helm, but Comey could punch the ceremonial first hole in the bow: the first, very likely, of many more to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think Comey will move the needle at all, even if he produces a note in Trump's handwriting that says 'kill the investigation'. The alt-right has already discounted anything Comey has to say, and Trump loyalists are happy to follow suit.</p>
<p>And, as you say, Comey's testimony could turn out to be a big nothingburger. Comey has a reputation, though, for making news with his testimony. Will he break his streak and be boring for a change?</p>
<p>Clear testimony that Trump might have tried to influence Comey could embolden Democratic Senators and Reps to keep the heat on high, however, which will affect all of the OTHER things they want to do and have to do this year, including possible runs at healthcare and tax cuts by the republicans, and the unavoidable vote, for instance, to raise the debt ceiling.</p>
<p>Or to put it another way, as long as the bad headlines are about Trump for the next year and a half or so, Democratic congressmen and Senators won't worry as much about keeping their seats in the midterms and vote accordingly, while many Republicans will be forced to hedge their bets on every vote out of fear of being lashed to a sinking ship.</p>
<p>The Ship of Fool is already leaky and unsteady. Some of that is due to the inexperience of its crew, and that will almost certainly improve even with Captain Blighted at the helm, but Comey could punch the ceremonial first hole in the bow: the first, very likely, of many more to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/06/06/trumps-polling-remarkably-flat/#comment-101845</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14036#comment-101845</guid>
		<description>we have two competing models for this kind of scandal. on the one hand there&#039;s watergate, and on the other there&#039;s iran-contra. although both had numerous crimes prosecuted and persons convicted, these scandals resulted in two very different outcomes for the historic popularity of the presidents involved. why was nixon hated and why was reagan teflon? both were involved, both broke the law, both had their policy agendas disrupted, but reagan recovered and became even more popular, while nixon continued to spiral downward.

to be honest, the trump administration has a lot in common with both.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have two competing models for this kind of scandal. on the one hand there's watergate, and on the other there's iran-contra. although both had numerous crimes prosecuted and persons convicted, these scandals resulted in two very different outcomes for the historic popularity of the presidents involved. why was nixon hated and why was reagan teflon? both were involved, both broke the law, both had their policy agendas disrupted, but reagan recovered and became even more popular, while nixon continued to spiral downward.</p>
<p>to be honest, the trump administration has a lot in common with both.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
