<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trump&#039;s First Two Months</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97382</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97382</guid>
		<description>michale [33]

&lt;i&gt;Of course, that&#039;s what YOU &quot;see&quot;..

But your view is colored by ur Party slavery, so..... :D &lt;/i&gt;

Of course that&#039;s what you&#039;re going to type. It&#039;s your pathetic argument that you think qualifies as political debate. I got news for you: Calling a poster a party bigot and a slave over and over and over is not political debate. It more resembles trolling than anything else. Is that how you get your jollies? Hanging out on a political chat board and calling anyone who disagrees with you a party bigot and slave and pretending like that is debating political issues?

&lt;i&gt;And in Weigantia...

As your continued comments prove.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

So you think someone answering your post on a chat board is adulation? That explains a lot. Perhaps you&#039;ve simply forgotten who you&#039;re talking to? I&#039;ve got nothing but pity for you, and this too has been covered. But if you respond to me, I&#039;ll respond to you. That&#039;s generally how chat boards work, eh? Ignoring people isn&#039;t my style... not saying that it might not become my style in the future if you insist on turning posts about political issues into personal arguments about bigotry and hypocrisy. Discussing the issues and not the posters actually does qualify as political debate. You should try it more often. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale [33]</p>
<p><i>Of course, that's what YOU "see"..</p>
<p>But your view is colored by ur Party slavery, so..... :D </i></p>
<p>Of course that's what you're going to type. It's your pathetic argument that you think qualifies as political debate. I got news for you: Calling a poster a party bigot and a slave over and over and over is not political debate. It more resembles trolling than anything else. Is that how you get your jollies? Hanging out on a political chat board and calling anyone who disagrees with you a party bigot and slave and pretending like that is debating political issues?</p>
<p><i>And in Weigantia...</p>
<p>As your continued comments prove.. :D </i></p>
<p>So you think someone answering your post on a chat board is adulation? That explains a lot. Perhaps you've simply forgotten who you're talking to? I've got nothing but pity for you, and this too has been covered. But if you respond to me, I'll respond to you. That's generally how chat boards work, eh? Ignoring people isn't my style... not saying that it might not become my style in the future if you insist on turning posts about political issues into personal arguments about bigotry and hypocrisy. Discussing the issues and not the posters actually does qualify as political debate. You should try it more often. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97358</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97358</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I see people trying to discuss Trump while you police the board and deem them worthy or unworthy to do so. You are the one that devolves the conversation into personal discussion.&lt;/I&gt;

Of course, that&#039;s what YOU &quot;see&quot;..

But your view is colored by ur Party slavery, so.....  :D

&lt;I&gt;Where else can I find unremitting and undying attention and adulation? :D

1. In your dreams
2. In your delusion
3. In your reflection
4. In your mirror&lt;/I&gt;

And in Weigantia...

As your continued comments prove..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I see people trying to discuss Trump while you police the board and deem them worthy or unworthy to do so. You are the one that devolves the conversation into personal discussion.</i></p>
<p>Of course, that's what YOU "see"..</p>
<p>But your view is colored by ur Party slavery, so.....  :D</p>
<p><i>Where else can I find unremitting and undying attention and adulation? :D</p>
<p>1. In your dreams<br />
2. In your delusion<br />
3. In your reflection<br />
4. In your mirror</i></p>
<p>And in Weigantia...</p>
<p>As your continued comments prove..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97327</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2017 22:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97327</guid>
		<description>michale [30] 

&lt;i&gt;Thereby, once again, making everything about me, personally.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

I see people trying to discuss Trump while you police the board and deem them worthy or unworthy to do so. You are the one that devolves the conversation into personal discussion. 
 
&lt;i&gt;Ya&#039;all wonder why I stick around?? &lt;/i&gt;

Not at all. Your self-delusion is self-limited. 

&lt;i&gt;Where else can I find unremitting and undying attention and adulation? :D &lt;/i&gt;

1. In your dreams
2. In your delusion 
3. In your reflection
4. In your mirror</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale [30] </p>
<p><i>Thereby, once again, making everything about me, personally.. :D </i></p>
<p>I see people trying to discuss Trump while you police the board and deem them worthy or unworthy to do so. You are the one that devolves the conversation into personal discussion. </p>
<p><i>Ya'all wonder why I stick around?? </i></p>
<p>Not at all. Your self-delusion is self-limited. </p>
<p><i>Where else can I find unremitting and undying attention and adulation? :D </i></p>
<p>1. In your dreams<br />
2. In your delusion<br />
3. In your reflection<br />
4. In your mirror</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97319</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97319</guid>
		<description>michale [29] 

&lt;i&gt;TRANSLATION: I have no logical response to your comments so I am just going to go on a personal attack binge and hope such deflection will cover the fact that I am a Party slave.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

That is some really insightful projection spewing forth. You should hold that up to the mirror and see how that reflects right back at you. I was discussing your Orange Crush when you deflected to a conversation about me personally. I cannot fathom why you think that doubling down on your personal insults towards me does anything except prove my point. 

&lt;i&gt;Ya&#039;all simply CAN&#039;T answer the hypocrisy so ya&#039;all simply resort to attacks.. &lt;/i&gt;

I was discussing our president when you decided to attack me personally. 

&lt;i&gt;Until such time as you can reconcile the denigration of President Trump for the EXACT same things ya&#039;all gave Obama a pass on?? Ya&#039;all will NEVER have any moral foundation.. &lt;/i&gt;

Do you honestly think that posters have to equally denigrate presidents in order to post an opinion? I&#039;m afraid you&#039;re living in a fantasy world of your own making if you think it&#039;s your job to police the board and decide who is worthy to post based on whether or not you deem they have &quot;reconciled the denigration.&quot; 

No poster has to answer to any other poster for anything, least of all you on your moral high horse standing in judgment of everyone else and deeming them worthy or unworthy. This is a political chat board, and no one needs your approval or your pronouncement of worthiness in order to discuss political issues, politicians, or to denigrate your Orange Crush. All anyone needs is a keyboard and an opinion. :)

&lt;i&gt;I wonder if you could fathom how EXACTLY you are describing yourself and your &quot;debate&quot; tactics.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

Posters want to express their opinions about our president and his con artistry, finger pointing, lying, conniving, tweeting, and receiving a beating, while you want to deflect that political discussion into a personal conversation about those posters. Now I ask you, if you insist on turning the conversation into one that&#039;s frequently personal, why in the world would it surprise you in the least that the conversation turned personal? &lt;---- rhetorical question not requiring an answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale [29] </p>
<p><i>TRANSLATION: I have no logical response to your comments so I am just going to go on a personal attack binge and hope such deflection will cover the fact that I am a Party slave.. :D </i></p>
<p>That is some really insightful projection spewing forth. You should hold that up to the mirror and see how that reflects right back at you. I was discussing your Orange Crush when you deflected to a conversation about me personally. I cannot fathom why you think that doubling down on your personal insults towards me does anything except prove my point. </p>
<p><i>Ya'all simply CAN'T answer the hypocrisy so ya'all simply resort to attacks.. </i></p>
<p>I was discussing our president when you decided to attack me personally. </p>
<p><i>Until such time as you can reconcile the denigration of President Trump for the EXACT same things ya'all gave Obama a pass on?? Ya'all will NEVER have any moral foundation.. </i></p>
<p>Do you honestly think that posters have to equally denigrate presidents in order to post an opinion? I'm afraid you're living in a fantasy world of your own making if you think it's your job to police the board and decide who is worthy to post based on whether or not you deem they have "reconciled the denigration." </p>
<p>No poster has to answer to any other poster for anything, least of all you on your moral high horse standing in judgment of everyone else and deeming them worthy or unworthy. This is a political chat board, and no one needs your approval or your pronouncement of worthiness in order to discuss political issues, politicians, or to denigrate your Orange Crush. All anyone needs is a keyboard and an opinion. :)</p>
<p><i>I wonder if you could fathom how EXACTLY you are describing yourself and your "debate" tactics.. :D </i></p>
<p>Posters want to express their opinions about our president and his con artistry, finger pointing, lying, conniving, tweeting, and receiving a beating, while you want to deflect that political discussion into a personal conversation about those posters. Now I ask you, if you insist on turning the conversation into one that's frequently personal, why in the world would it surprise you in the least that the conversation turned personal? &lt;---- rhetorical question not requiring an answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97285</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2017 08:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97285</guid>
		<description>Thereby, once again, making everything about me, personally..  :D

Ya&#039;all wonder why I stick around??

Where else can I find unremitting and undying attention and adulation?  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thereby, once again, making everything about me, personally..  :D</p>
<p>Ya'all wonder why I stick around??</p>
<p>Where else can I find unremitting and undying attention and adulation?  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97283</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2017 07:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97283</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;**TRANSLATION: Now&#039;s the point in the political discussion where Michale has little else so he deflects to discussion regarding the poster and makes up some BS he couldn&#039;t possibly know and then resorts to name calling for doing something he just made up. If a poster responds to Michale&#039;s post and calls him on his utter nonsensical BS, he simply responds saying that the poster didn&#039;t disagree with someone else and thereby their silence means they agree. This utter nonsensical bullshit is what Michale considers to be political debate. :)&lt;/I&gt;

TRANSLATION:  I have no logical response to your comments so I am just going to go on a personal attack binge and hope such deflection will cover the fact that I am a Party slave..  :D

Ya&#039;all simply CAN&#039;T answer the hypocrisy so ya&#039;all simply resort to attacks..

Until such time as you can reconcile the denigration of President Trump for the EXACT same things ya&#039;all gave Obama a pass on??  Ya&#039;all will NEVER have any moral foundation..

It&#039;s really that simple...

&lt;I&gt;Have you ever noticed how you deflect/devolve almost every discussion about politics, political figures, or current political events into simply monotonous utter nonsensical name calling of other posters&#039; ad nauseam? When you do so, you are wallowing in bullshittery. :)&lt;/I&gt;

I wonder if you could fathom how EXACTLY you are describing yourself and your &quot;debate&quot; tactics..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>**TRANSLATION: Now's the point in the political discussion where Michale has little else so he deflects to discussion regarding the poster and makes up some BS he couldn't possibly know and then resorts to name calling for doing something he just made up. If a poster responds to Michale's post and calls him on his utter nonsensical BS, he simply responds saying that the poster didn't disagree with someone else and thereby their silence means they agree. This utter nonsensical bullshit is what Michale considers to be political debate. :)</i></p>
<p>TRANSLATION:  I have no logical response to your comments so I am just going to go on a personal attack binge and hope such deflection will cover the fact that I am a Party slave..  :D</p>
<p>Ya'all simply CAN'T answer the hypocrisy so ya'all simply resort to attacks..</p>
<p>Until such time as you can reconcile the denigration of President Trump for the EXACT same things ya'all gave Obama a pass on??  Ya'all will NEVER have any moral foundation..</p>
<p>It's really that simple...</p>
<p><i>Have you ever noticed how you deflect/devolve almost every discussion about politics, political figures, or current political events into simply monotonous utter nonsensical name calling of other posters' ad nauseam? When you do so, you are wallowing in bullshittery. :)</i></p>
<p>I wonder if you could fathom how EXACTLY you are describing yourself and your "debate" tactics..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97273</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2017 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97273</guid>
		<description>michale [25]

&lt;i&gt;And yet, you remained silent when Obama blatantly, unabashedly and continually lied to millions and millions of Americans, just to pass CrapCare..

Your ideological bigotry is showing.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

**TRANSLATION: Now&#039;s the point in the political discussion where Michale has little else so he deflects to discussion regarding the poster and makes up some BS he couldn&#039;t possibly know and then resorts to name calling for doing something he just made up. If a poster responds to Michale&#039;s post and calls him on his utter nonsensical BS, he simply responds saying that the poster didn&#039;t disagree with someone else and thereby their silence means they agree. This utter nonsensical bullshit is what Michale considers to be political debate. :)

&lt;i&gt;And maybe Obama would have closed Gitmo like he talked about ad nasuem.. 

You didn&#039;t complain about that? 

Once again... Ideological bigotry at work... &lt;/i&gt;

See **TRANSLATION above. 

&lt;i&gt;Sorry, Victoria.. You have absolutely no moral foundation to castigate President Trump for his lying..

When you do so, you are wallowing in hypocrisy... &lt;/i&gt;

Sorry, M-i-c-h-a-e-l, but my moral foundation is absolutely great, and how is your moral high horse? &lt;--- rhetorical question requiring no answer whatsoever 

I&#039;ll continue to castigate PT or any other politician for their lying (or whatever else) on this political forum whenever I desire because they are actually political figures, and discussing politicians and political events is the reason for the very existence of political chat boards. Although my childhood babysitter did go on to become the Governor of Texas, that is as close to holding political office as I myself have ever come... so any discussion about political persons or political events that is deflected by you into a discussion of me personally, bigotry, hypocrisy, and/or moral foundation does NOT exactly qualify as actual political discussion. 

Have you ever noticed how you deflect/devolve almost every discussion about politics, political figures, or current political events into simply monotonous utter nonsensical name calling of other posters&#039; ad nauseam? When you do so, you are wallowing in bullshittery. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michale [25]</p>
<p><i>And yet, you remained silent when Obama blatantly, unabashedly and continually lied to millions and millions of Americans, just to pass CrapCare..</p>
<p>Your ideological bigotry is showing.. :D </i></p>
<p>**TRANSLATION: Now's the point in the political discussion where Michale has little else so he deflects to discussion regarding the poster and makes up some BS he couldn't possibly know and then resorts to name calling for doing something he just made up. If a poster responds to Michale's post and calls him on his utter nonsensical BS, he simply responds saying that the poster didn't disagree with someone else and thereby their silence means they agree. This utter nonsensical bullshit is what Michale considers to be political debate. :)</p>
<p><i>And maybe Obama would have closed Gitmo like he talked about ad nasuem.. </p>
<p>You didn't complain about that? </p>
<p>Once again... Ideological bigotry at work... </i></p>
<p>See **TRANSLATION above. </p>
<p><i>Sorry, Victoria.. You have absolutely no moral foundation to castigate President Trump for his lying..</p>
<p>When you do so, you are wallowing in hypocrisy... </i></p>
<p>Sorry, M-i-c-h-a-e-l, but my moral foundation is absolutely great, and how is your moral high horse? &lt;--- rhetorical question requiring no answer whatsoever </p>
<p>I&#039;ll continue to castigate PT or any other politician for their lying (or whatever else) on this political forum whenever I desire because they are actually political figures, and discussing politicians and political events is the reason for the very existence of political chat boards. Although my childhood babysitter did go on to become the Governor of Texas, that is as close to holding political office as I myself have ever come... so any discussion about political persons or political events that is deflected by you into a discussion of me personally, bigotry, hypocrisy, and/or moral foundation does NOT exactly qualify as actual political discussion. </p>
<p>Have you ever noticed how you deflect/devolve almost every discussion about politics, political figures, or current political events into simply monotonous utter nonsensical name calling of other posters&#039; ad nauseam? When you do so, you are wallowing in bullshittery. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97169</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97169</guid>
		<description>Next time ya&#039;all want to denigrate and castigate cops??

http://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/matias-ferreira-double-amputee-to-join-suffolk-county-police-1.13307522

Think about that.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next time ya'all want to denigrate and castigate cops??</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/matias-ferreira-double-amputee-to-join-suffolk-county-police-1.13307522" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/matias-ferreira-double-amputee-to-join-suffolk-county-police-1.13307522</a></p>
<p>Think about that.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97143</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97143</guid>
		<description>And STILL nothing about the London terrorist attack???

I tell ya, we should BAN cars!!!

Or, at the VERY least, we should make sure car owners are licensed and forced to carry insurance and that all cars are registered in a central database..  THAT will surely prevent car violence!!!!

Oh... wait....   :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And STILL nothing about the London terrorist attack???</p>
<p>I tell ya, we should BAN cars!!!</p>
<p>Or, at the VERY least, we should make sure car owners are licensed and forced to carry insurance and that all cars are registered in a central database..  THAT will surely prevent car violence!!!!</p>
<p>Oh... wait....   :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97135</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97135</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I didn&#039;t set their timeline, and the only thing I&#039;d &quot;give the GOP&quot; is the middle finger for what they&#039;re planning to do to 24+ millions of Americans in order to give more tax cuts for people who are already well off. It&#039;s sickening.&lt;/I&gt;

And yet, you remained silent when Obama blatantly, unabashedly and continually lied to millions and millions of Americans, just to pass CrapCare..

Your ideological bigotry is showing..  :D

&lt;I&gt;Who knows, maybe they&#039;ll actually put together a health care plan like the one Trump talked about &lt;/I&gt;

And maybe Obama would have closed Gitmo like he talked about ad nasuem..

You didn&#039;t complain about that?  

Once again... Ideological bigotry at work...

&lt;I&gt;when he was going from city to city and sitting up in his ivory tower on his gold throne and lying like a damn rug&lt;/I&gt;

Sorry, Victoria.. You have absolutely no moral foundation to castigate President Trump for his lying..

When you do so, you are wallowing in hypocrisy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I didn't set their timeline, and the only thing I'd "give the GOP" is the middle finger for what they're planning to do to 24+ millions of Americans in order to give more tax cuts for people who are already well off. It's sickening.</i></p>
<p>And yet, you remained silent when Obama blatantly, unabashedly and continually lied to millions and millions of Americans, just to pass CrapCare..</p>
<p>Your ideological bigotry is showing..  :D</p>
<p><i>Who knows, maybe they'll actually put together a health care plan like the one Trump talked about </i></p>
<p>And maybe Obama would have closed Gitmo like he talked about ad nasuem..</p>
<p>You didn't complain about that?  </p>
<p>Once again... Ideological bigotry at work...</p>
<p><i>when he was going from city to city and sitting up in his ivory tower on his gold throne and lying like a damn rug</i></p>
<p>Sorry, Victoria.. You have absolutely no moral foundation to castigate President Trump for his lying..</p>
<p>When you do so, you are wallowing in hypocrisy...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97125</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97125</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Give the GOP some time. They&#039;ll get it right.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

I didn&#039;t set their timeline, and the only thing I&#039;d &quot;give the GOP&quot; is the middle finger for what they&#039;re planning to do to 24+ millions of Americans in order to give more tax cuts for people who are already well off. It&#039;s sickening. 

Who knows, maybe they&#039;ll actually put together a health care plan like the one Trump talked about when he was going from city to city and sitting up in his ivory tower on his gold throne and lying like a damn rug?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPJfKdp3bDs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Give the GOP some time. They'll get it right.. :D </i></p>
<p>I didn't set their timeline, and the only thing I'd "give the GOP" is the middle finger for what they're planning to do to 24+ millions of Americans in order to give more tax cuts for people who are already well off. It's sickening. </p>
<p>Who knows, maybe they'll actually put together a health care plan like the one Trump talked about when he was going from city to city and sitting up in his ivory tower on his gold throne and lying like a damn rug?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPJfKdp3bDs" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPJfKdp3bDs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97117</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97117</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;No health care vote today. He&#039;ll have to come back later and try to work his Art of the Deal magic and screw over the American people some other day... but not today. :)&lt;/I&gt;

Look how many tries it to Obama and the Democrats to get CrapCare so it would inflict maximum harm to the American people...

Give the GOP some time.  They&#039;ll get it right..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No health care vote today. He'll have to come back later and try to work his Art of the Deal magic and screw over the American people some other day... but not today. :)</i></p>
<p>Look how many tries it to Obama and the Democrats to get CrapCare so it would inflict maximum harm to the American people...</p>
<p>Give the GOP some time.  They'll get it right..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97114</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97114</guid>
		<description>If &quot;moderate&quot; Repubs hold out, good for them. But right now it looks like the hold up isn&#039;t the supposed &quot;moderates&quot; it&#039;s the sadistic Tea Partiers. They haven&#039;t gotten enough flesh yet -- they can&#039;t cause enough suffering yet. We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If "moderate" Repubs hold out, good for them. But right now it looks like the hold up isn't the supposed "moderates" it's the sadistic Tea Partiers. They haven't gotten enough flesh yet -- they can't cause enough suffering yet. We'll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97113</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97113</guid>
		<description>Tea Partiers holding out to get a repeal of the pre-existing condition plank in the ACA. Yessiree, your stinking Tea Party Rep wants insurance companies to be able to go back to charging more if you have a preexisting condition. Ah, the good &#039;ol days.

The Tea Party pricks may derail the vote, but then Trump will just give them what they want, fucking over the public so he can claim a &quot;win&quot;. 

Then it will be back to the &quot;moderate&quot; Republicans to be beaten down -- to be convinced to completely screw over their constituents to make Trump look like a &quot;winner&quot;. 

A combination of utter incompetence, complete ignorance, greed, and sadism: Trump and his GOP. 

History will remember. People will remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea Partiers holding out to get a repeal of the pre-existing condition plank in the ACA. Yessiree, your stinking Tea Party Rep wants insurance companies to be able to go back to charging more if you have a preexisting condition. Ah, the good 'ol days.</p>
<p>The Tea Party pricks may derail the vote, but then Trump will just give them what they want, fucking over the public so he can claim a "win". </p>
<p>Then it will be back to the "moderate" Republicans to be beaten down -- to be convinced to completely screw over their constituents to make Trump look like a "winner". </p>
<p>A combination of utter incompetence, complete ignorance, greed, and sadism: Trump and his GOP. </p>
<p>History will remember. People will remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97109</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97109</guid>
		<description>Oh. My. God. Trump is right this moment talking about how close the health care vote is going to be. Did know one tell the doddering old fool they&#039;ve postponed the vote?

Winning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. My. God. Trump is right this moment talking about how close the health care vote is going to be. Did know one tell the doddering old fool they've postponed the vote?</p>
<p>Winning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97108</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97108</guid>
		<description>Remember that time that Con Don said he was the closer and he knew how to make the best deals and people were going to get tired of winning? Well, that was just a load of bullshittery. 

No health care vote today. He&#039;ll have to come back later and try to work his Art of the Deal magic and screw over the American people some other day... but not today. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that time that Con Don said he was the closer and he knew how to make the best deals and people were going to get tired of winning? Well, that was just a load of bullshittery. </p>
<p>No health care vote today. He'll have to come back later and try to work his Art of the Deal magic and screw over the American people some other day... but not today. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97106</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97106</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54078/reverend-barber-paul-ryan-healthcare/

&quot;With all due respect, young lady,&quot; Barber said, gently. &quot;We&#039;re ministers, and preachers, and rabbis, and we wrote him to meet with him. This is not a game for us. This is not an exercise in futility. People will die. We want to look him in the eye. We want to hold him accountable to the Scriptures. He claims to be a Christian. We know that the number one thing for Christians is healing, to care for others. This legislation is sin. It&#039;s immoral. My daughter could die. To think that, if she misses a payment, she could have to pay a penalty to a greedy and sick business society in order to keep her insurance, and she&#039;s been sick since she was a year-and-a-half, I need to see … him.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

And for every horror-fear-monger story, there is a corresponding fact as to how bad CrapCare was..

Ya&#039;all didn&#039;t care about those Americans who died when they lost their health insurance under CrapCare, right??

So, why care now??

Ahhhh that&#039;s right..  Because back then, it was a guy with a D after his name who was killing Americans... 

Ya&#039;all don&#039;t mind it then...   :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><a href="http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54078/reverend-barber-paul-ryan-healthcare/" rel="nofollow">http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54078/reverend-barber-paul-ryan-healthcare/</a></p>
<p>"With all due respect, young lady," Barber said, gently. "We're ministers, and preachers, and rabbis, and we wrote him to meet with him. This is not a game for us. This is not an exercise in futility. People will die. We want to look him in the eye. We want to hold him accountable to the Scriptures. He claims to be a Christian. We know that the number one thing for Christians is healing, to care for others. This legislation is sin. It's immoral. My daughter could die. To think that, if she misses a payment, she could have to pay a penalty to a greedy and sick business society in order to keep her insurance, and she's been sick since she was a year-and-a-half, I need to see … him."</i></p>
<p>And for every horror-fear-monger story, there is a corresponding fact as to how bad CrapCare was..</p>
<p>Ya'all didn't care about those Americans who died when they lost their health insurance under CrapCare, right??</p>
<p>So, why care now??</p>
<p>Ahhhh that's right..  Because back then, it was a guy with a D after his name who was killing Americans... </p>
<p>Ya'all don't mind it then...   :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97105</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97105</guid>
		<description>http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54078/reverend-barber-paul-ryan-healthcare/

&lt;em&gt;&quot;With all due respect, young lady,&quot; Barber said, gently. &quot;We&#039;re ministers, and preachers, and rabbis, and we wrote him to meet with him. This is not a game for us. This is not an exercise in futility. People will die. We want to look him in the eye. We want to hold him accountable to the Scriptures. He claims to be a Christian. We know that the number one thing for Christians is healing, to care for others. This legislation is sin. It&#039;s immoral. My daughter could die. To think that, if she misses a payment, she could have to pay a penalty to a greedy and sick business society in order to keep her insurance, and she&#039;s been sick since she was a year-and-a-half, I need to see … him.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54078/reverend-barber-paul-ryan-healthcare/" rel="nofollow">http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54078/reverend-barber-paul-ryan-healthcare/</a></p>
<p><em>"With all due respect, young lady," Barber said, gently. "We're ministers, and preachers, and rabbis, and we wrote him to meet with him. This is not a game for us. This is not an exercise in futility. People will die. We want to look him in the eye. We want to hold him accountable to the Scriptures. He claims to be a Christian. We know that the number one thing for Christians is healing, to care for others. This legislation is sin. It's immoral. My daughter could die. To think that, if she misses a payment, she could have to pay a penalty to a greedy and sick business society in order to keep her insurance, and she's been sick since she was a year-and-a-half, I need to see … him."</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97103</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97103</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;History will remember who stood up for America and the American Way at this time of crisis, and who didn&#039;t. People will remember.&lt;/I&gt;

Yep..

And that guy was President Trump....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>History will remember who stood up for America and the American Way at this time of crisis, and who didn't. People will remember.</i></p>
<p>Yep..</p>
<p>And that guy was President Trump....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97102</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97102</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And Ukrainians will remember who sided with Putin against their freedom. And Lithuanians and Latvians and Estonians will remember -- there were Americans who wanted Putin to be able to take over free countries again. Americans who would kiss Putin&#039;s ass in order to be able to do damage to Obama&#039;s legacy. Americans who would condemn their fellow-Americans to returning to the old-bad-days before the ACA, just to score some kind of twisted points, to call themselves &quot;winners&#039;.

Scum.&lt;/I&gt; 

Yep.. No bigotry there whatsoever..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And Ukrainians will remember who sided with Putin against their freedom. And Lithuanians and Latvians and Estonians will remember -- there were Americans who wanted Putin to be able to take over free countries again. Americans who would kiss Putin's ass in order to be able to do damage to Obama's legacy. Americans who would condemn their fellow-Americans to returning to the old-bad-days before the ACA, just to score some kind of twisted points, to call themselves "winners'.</p>
<p>Scum.</i> </p>
<p>Yep.. No bigotry there whatsoever..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97101</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97101</guid>
		<description>And Ukrainians will remember who sided with Putin against their freedom. And Lithuanians and Latvians and Estonians will remember -- there were Americans who wanted Putin to be able to take over free countries again. Americans who would kiss Putin&#039;s ass in order to be able to do damage to Obama&#039;s legacy. Americans who would condemn their fellow-Americans to returning to the old-bad-days before the ACA, just to score some kind of twisted points, to call themselves &quot;winners&#039;.

Scum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Ukrainians will remember who sided with Putin against their freedom. And Lithuanians and Latvians and Estonians will remember -- there were Americans who wanted Putin to be able to take over free countries again. Americans who would kiss Putin's ass in order to be able to do damage to Obama's legacy. Americans who would condemn their fellow-Americans to returning to the old-bad-days before the ACA, just to score some kind of twisted points, to call themselves "winners'.</p>
<p>Scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97100</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97100</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/23/1646420/-Former-Russian-Lawmaker-and-Putin-critic-shot-dead-in-Kyiv

&lt;em&gt;March 23 (UPI) -- Police in Ukraine suspect a contract killer fatally shot former Russian parliament member Denis Voronenkov on Thursday in Kiev.&lt;/em&gt;

Putin is a murderer and Trump&#039;s favorite guy. GOP says &quot;whatever works to get us our tax cuts&quot;. 

History will remember who stood up for America and the American Way at this time of crisis, and who didn&#039;t. People will remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/23/1646420/-Former-Russian-Lawmaker-and-Putin-critic-shot-dead-in-Kyiv" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/23/1646420/-Former-Russian-Lawmaker-and-Putin-critic-shot-dead-in-Kyiv</a></p>
<p><em>March 23 (UPI) -- Police in Ukraine suspect a contract killer fatally shot former Russian parliament member Denis Voronenkov on Thursday in Kiev.</em></p>
<p>Putin is a murderer and Trump's favorite guy. GOP says "whatever works to get us our tax cuts". </p>
<p>History will remember who stood up for America and the American Way at this time of crisis, and who didn't. People will remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97095</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97095</guid>
		<description>Remember how I said before that, if the Democrat Party had a single iota of common sense, they would keep their powder dry on Gorsuch and save their filibuster for a time when it actually might do some good???

And, for the most part, there was universal agreement here in Weigantia on that point...

&lt;B&gt;Schumer says Dems will filibuster Gorsuch&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/23/schumer-says-dems-will-filibuster-gorsuch/

I knew the Democrats couldn&#039;t show an iota of common sense...  :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how I said before that, if the Democrat Party had a single iota of common sense, they would keep their powder dry on Gorsuch and save their filibuster for a time when it actually might do some good???</p>
<p>And, for the most part, there was universal agreement here in Weigantia on that point...</p>
<p><b>Schumer says Dems will filibuster Gorsuch</b><br />
<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/23/schumer-says-dems-will-filibuster-gorsuch/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/23/schumer-says-dems-will-filibuster-gorsuch/</a></p>
<p>I knew the Democrats couldn't show an iota of common sense...  :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97094</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97094</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;US code title 18 P1, ch 115, 2381-”Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”&lt;/I&gt;

Once again, you are describing perfectly the Democrat Party during the Bush years...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>US code title 18 P1, ch 115, 2381-”Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”</i></p>
<p>Once again, you are describing perfectly the Democrat Party during the Bush years...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97093</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97093</guid>
		<description>US code title 18 P1, ch 115, 2381-”Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US code title 18 P1, ch 115, 2381-”Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97087</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97087</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Trump’s approval rating sucks — according to polls.

These are the same polls that said Hillary Clinton would be in the White House right now. Not only that, but they said Clinton would easily win the presidency.

Even if the polls were now showing Trump’s popularity booming, I’d say the same thing: To hell with the polls.

Pollsters must love these between-election polls because they can report anything and not be proved wrong. It’s when there is an election coming up that they really stick their necks out.

The media, of course, are complicit in the pollsters’ scam. Without the press, the polls would go unnoticed.

So whether Trump’s approval rating is 39 percent or 93 percent, take the numbers with a pillar of salt.&lt;/B&gt;
http://nypost.com/2017/03/23/trumps-approval-rating-is-terrible-but-so-are-the-polls/

Exactly...

That&#039;s why polls are virtually meaningless..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Trump’s approval rating sucks — according to polls.</p>
<p>These are the same polls that said Hillary Clinton would be in the White House right now. Not only that, but they said Clinton would easily win the presidency.</p>
<p>Even if the polls were now showing Trump’s popularity booming, I’d say the same thing: To hell with the polls.</p>
<p>Pollsters must love these between-election polls because they can report anything and not be proved wrong. It’s when there is an election coming up that they really stick their necks out.</p>
<p>The media, of course, are complicit in the pollsters’ scam. Without the press, the polls would go unnoticed.</p>
<p>So whether Trump’s approval rating is 39 percent or 93 percent, take the numbers with a pillar of salt.</b><br />
<a href="http://nypost.com/2017/03/23/trumps-approval-rating-is-terrible-but-so-are-the-polls/" rel="nofollow">http://nypost.com/2017/03/23/trumps-approval-rating-is-terrible-but-so-are-the-polls/</a></p>
<p>Exactly...</p>
<p>That's why polls are virtually meaningless..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97067</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97067</guid>
		<description>Woops...

My bust...

You wrote &quot;discourse&quot;, but I read &quot;discord&quot;....

How embarrassing....   :D

Well, my point still stands.. 

Just replace &quot;discourse&quot; with &quot;discord&quot; if you would be so kind..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops...</p>
<p>My bust...</p>
<p>You wrote "discourse", but I read "discord"....</p>
<p>How embarrassing....   :D</p>
<p>Well, my point still stands.. </p>
<p>Just replace "discourse" with "discord" if you would be so kind..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97066</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97066</guid>
		<description>There was a very good RCP article I read where it explained how assassinating the President has now become acceptable discussion amongst the Left Whinery..

But damned if I can find it now..

When I try to GOOGLE it, GOOGLE sends me to blurbs about President Trump&#039;s press conferences....

Weird....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a very good RCP article I read where it explained how assassinating the President has now become acceptable discussion amongst the Left Whinery..</p>
<p>But damned if I can find it now..</p>
<p>When I try to GOOGLE it, GOOGLE sends me to blurbs about President Trump's press conferences....</p>
<p>Weird....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97065</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97065</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;You want to talk creating discourse?? How about talk of assassinating President Trump has become mainstream and acceptable amongst the Left Whinery??

Anyone here condemn that music video where President Trump was assassinated??

Nope... And why?? Because it&#039;s Trump so anything and everything is acceptable..

So WHO is creating the discourse???&lt;/I&gt;

There&#039;s even a #AssassinateTrump hastag, for christ&#039;s sake!!!

And TRUMP is creating discourse!??  :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You want to talk creating discourse?? How about talk of assassinating President Trump has become mainstream and acceptable amongst the Left Whinery??</p>
<p>Anyone here condemn that music video where President Trump was assassinated??</p>
<p>Nope... And why?? Because it's Trump so anything and everything is acceptable..</p>
<p>So WHO is creating the discourse???</i></p>
<p>There's even a #AssassinateTrump hastag, for christ's sake!!!</p>
<p>And TRUMP is creating discourse!??  :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97064</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97064</guid>
		<description>Listen,

&lt;I&gt;I think you left out Trump&#039;s budget attack on Meals on Wheels&#039; that could end the program in many areas and result in a large number of Trump supporters going without!
That one shocked a lot of his elderly supporters!&lt;/I&gt;

Cite??

&lt;I&gt;The biggest problem with Trump&#039;s first two months is that he has lied so often&lt;/I&gt;

No more than anyone of the Left Whinery

&lt;I&gt; and created discourse&lt;/I&gt;

You want to talk about creating discourse??  How about the Left Whinery talking about impeachment even before President Trump is sworn in??

You want to talk creating discourse??  How about talk of assassinating President Trump has become mainstream and acceptable amongst the Left Whinery??

Anyone here condemn that music video where President Trump was assassinated??

Nope...  And why??  Because it&#039;s Trump so anything and everything is acceptable..

So WHO is creating the discourse???

&lt;I&gt;that now we can never be sure that if an actual threat to our nation occurs, we would believe him.&lt;/I&gt;

Oh give me a break...

There&#039;s no unsure about it..

President Trump could tell you that ice is cold and water is wet and ya&#039;all wouldn&#039;t believe him...

Not sure, my left arse cheek!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen,</p>
<p><i>I think you left out Trump's budget attack on Meals on Wheels' that could end the program in many areas and result in a large number of Trump supporters going without!<br />
That one shocked a lot of his elderly supporters!</i></p>
<p>Cite??</p>
<p><i>The biggest problem with Trump's first two months is that he has lied so often</i></p>
<p>No more than anyone of the Left Whinery</p>
<p><i> and created discourse</i></p>
<p>You want to talk about creating discourse??  How about the Left Whinery talking about impeachment even before President Trump is sworn in??</p>
<p>You want to talk creating discourse??  How about talk of assassinating President Trump has become mainstream and acceptable amongst the Left Whinery??</p>
<p>Anyone here condemn that music video where President Trump was assassinated??</p>
<p>Nope...  And why??  Because it's Trump so anything and everything is acceptable..</p>
<p>So WHO is creating the discourse???</p>
<p><i>that now we can never be sure that if an actual threat to our nation occurs, we would believe him.</i></p>
<p>Oh give me a break...</p>
<p>There's no unsure about it..</p>
<p>President Trump could tell you that ice is cold and water is wet and ya'all wouldn't believe him...</p>
<p>Not sure, my left arse cheek!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97063</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97063</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;President Trump hasn&#039;t built any of his promised border wall yet, but then again it&#039;s only been two months.&lt;/I&gt;

Like you said, it&#039;s only been 2 months..

Anyone who thinks that the wall could be in place and up in that time frame and blames President Trump because it&#039;s not is..   

Well, I have been told that pointing out Party enslavement is offensive, but if there ever was bona fide proof of it, THAT would be it..

The paperwork&#039;s been drawn up, bids are being placed and materials are being priced..  :D

Interesting to note.  The ahem... &quot;government&quot; in California has gone on record that they will penalize any CA company that puts in a bid for the Border Security Barrier...  :D

Good old fashioned extortion..  That&#039;s what makes California work..  :^/

&lt;I&gt;What he will not be successful at, however, is &quot;making Mexico pay for it.&quot; That part just isn&#039;t going to fly with the Mexican government. &lt;/I&gt;

And, if the Mexican government had a say in the matter, you would have a point... But they don&#039;t..

Like the G20, Mexico will dance to America&#039;s tune and will smile while they do it...

&lt;I&gt;The Trump administration already floated an alternative plan -- a border tax on all Mexican imports -- which would not actually tax &quot;Mexico,&quot; but rather American consumers.&lt;/I&gt;

I don&#039;t see how you get there from here...

Mexico pays the border tax, not the importers..

&lt;I&gt;Total ban on Muslims entering the country&lt;/I&gt;

That was never in the cards and everyone here knows it...

Put another way... Trump had advocated a total &quot;ban&quot; on muslims like Hillary and Obama advocated a &quot;ban&quot; on same-sex marriage and the Democrat Party advocated a &quot;ban&quot; on black Americans...

Good for goose, good for gander...

&lt;I&gt;Trump supporters probably never really expected to see Hillary behind bars, though, so on this one Trump likely will get a pass.&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly..

&lt;I&gt;Cut better trade deals

This is another one that, to be fair, Trump just hasn&#039;t had enough time to address. Trade deals take a long time to negotiate. &lt;/I&gt;

Ahem... I assume you haven&#039;t read the reports from the G20 meeting, eh??  :D

&lt;I&gt;To be fair, his supporters seem to love his tweets, though, no matter how ridiculous they are to the rest of us.&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly...

Until the Left Whinery can stop attacking patriotic Americans and start trying to understand patriotic Americans, they will never understand what President Trump is all about...  :D

&lt;I&gt;One thing Trump hasn&#039;t done in his first two months is attempt any sort of outreach to Democrats. &lt;/I&gt;

This is simply not factual..

The problem here is that Democrats are acting EXACTLY like Republicans were acting when Obama was first elected..

Ya&#039;all didn&#039;t mind THEN that your guy was ignoring the opposition Party..  Matter o fact, ya&#039;all encouraged that your guy &quot;stick it to the Right&quot;...

Even with the Democrat&#039;s attitude, President Trump has tried extending his hand to Democrat leadership..

And he pulled back a bloody stump for his troubles..

Democrats were talking impeachment even before President Trump was sworn in...

The Left gleefully watches and muses joyfully about President Trump being assassinated...

No, the Left has set the stage for how this administration will treat the enemy Party...

The Left Whinery has made their bed and President Trump is going to ensure they lie in it..

It&#039;s really THAT simple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>President Trump hasn't built any of his promised border wall yet, but then again it's only been two months.</i></p>
<p>Like you said, it's only been 2 months..</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks that the wall could be in place and up in that time frame and blames President Trump because it's not is..   </p>
<p>Well, I have been told that pointing out Party enslavement is offensive, but if there ever was bona fide proof of it, THAT would be it..</p>
<p>The paperwork's been drawn up, bids are being placed and materials are being priced..  :D</p>
<p>Interesting to note.  The ahem... "government" in California has gone on record that they will penalize any CA company that puts in a bid for the Border Security Barrier...  :D</p>
<p>Good old fashioned extortion..  That's what makes California work..  :^/</p>
<p><i>What he will not be successful at, however, is "making Mexico pay for it." That part just isn't going to fly with the Mexican government. </i></p>
<p>And, if the Mexican government had a say in the matter, you would have a point... But they don't..</p>
<p>Like the G20, Mexico will dance to America's tune and will smile while they do it...</p>
<p><i>The Trump administration already floated an alternative plan -- a border tax on all Mexican imports -- which would not actually tax "Mexico," but rather American consumers.</i></p>
<p>I don't see how you get there from here...</p>
<p>Mexico pays the border tax, not the importers..</p>
<p><i>Total ban on Muslims entering the country</i></p>
<p>That was never in the cards and everyone here knows it...</p>
<p>Put another way... Trump had advocated a total "ban" on muslims like Hillary and Obama advocated a "ban" on same-sex marriage and the Democrat Party advocated a "ban" on black Americans...</p>
<p>Good for goose, good for gander...</p>
<p><i>Trump supporters probably never really expected to see Hillary behind bars, though, so on this one Trump likely will get a pass.</i></p>
<p>Exactly..</p>
<p><i>Cut better trade deals</p>
<p>This is another one that, to be fair, Trump just hasn't had enough time to address. Trade deals take a long time to negotiate. </i></p>
<p>Ahem... I assume you haven't read the reports from the G20 meeting, eh??  :D</p>
<p><i>To be fair, his supporters seem to love his tweets, though, no matter how ridiculous they are to the rest of us.</i></p>
<p>Exactly...</p>
<p>Until the Left Whinery can stop attacking patriotic Americans and start trying to understand patriotic Americans, they will never understand what President Trump is all about...  :D</p>
<p><i>One thing Trump hasn't done in his first two months is attempt any sort of outreach to Democrats. </i></p>
<p>This is simply not factual..</p>
<p>The problem here is that Democrats are acting EXACTLY like Republicans were acting when Obama was first elected..</p>
<p>Ya'all didn't mind THEN that your guy was ignoring the opposition Party..  Matter o fact, ya'all encouraged that your guy "stick it to the Right"...</p>
<p>Even with the Democrat's attitude, President Trump has tried extending his hand to Democrat leadership..</p>
<p>And he pulled back a bloody stump for his troubles..</p>
<p>Democrats were talking impeachment even before President Trump was sworn in...</p>
<p>The Left gleefully watches and muses joyfully about President Trump being assassinated...</p>
<p>No, the Left has set the stage for how this administration will treat the enemy Party...</p>
<p>The Left Whinery has made their bed and President Trump is going to ensure they lie in it..</p>
<p>It's really THAT simple...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97055</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 02:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97055</guid>
		<description>That seems like a fairly good and objective report card. As you say, many of his early moves may be unpopular with the liberals and the commentariat, but they look good to his base (Supreme Court, Muslim Ban, acting Unpresidential but very Trump).

I am not yet convinced that any downturns in his apparent success rate will turn his base away from him. To start with, we&#039;re already talking about maybe a 33% segment of the population, which is already pretty compact. If there&#039;s one thing he&#039;s an expert at, it&#039;s deflecting blame; if there&#039;s one truth about human nature, that will probably preserve his support among his voters as they begin to feel the sting of budget cuts, tax hikes, worse health care options, and ill-advised foreign adventures, it&#039;s that admitting one was wrong is the last thing one should do when confronted with cognitive dissonance.

I will be interested to see if his opportunistic supporters among more &#039;mainstream&#039; Republicans will stand by him when the nuts begin to get cut. They are not his base; they came along for the ride in the general election, looking for a Republican-in-name-only-if-that&#039;s-all-we-can-get-and-gee-damn-Hillary-are-you-kidding-me president who would deliver on the Supreme Court, pass some decent upper bracket and corporate tax cuts, and retrieve the &#039;it&#039;s a fundamentally conservative country&#039; myth. I suspect they hate all this unprofessional BS except that they hated Hillary more, and with Pence as back-up are prepared to bail on the president a lot quicker than his &#039;base&#039; is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems like a fairly good and objective report card. As you say, many of his early moves may be unpopular with the liberals and the commentariat, but they look good to his base (Supreme Court, Muslim Ban, acting Unpresidential but very Trump).</p>
<p>I am not yet convinced that any downturns in his apparent success rate will turn his base away from him. To start with, we're already talking about maybe a 33% segment of the population, which is already pretty compact. If there's one thing he's an expert at, it's deflecting blame; if there's one truth about human nature, that will probably preserve his support among his voters as they begin to feel the sting of budget cuts, tax hikes, worse health care options, and ill-advised foreign adventures, it's that admitting one was wrong is the last thing one should do when confronted with cognitive dissonance.</p>
<p>I will be interested to see if his opportunistic supporters among more 'mainstream' Republicans will stand by him when the nuts begin to get cut. They are not his base; they came along for the ride in the general election, looking for a Republican-in-name-only-if-that's-all-we-can-get-and-gee-damn-Hillary-are-you-kidding-me president who would deliver on the Supreme Court, pass some decent upper bracket and corporate tax cuts, and retrieve the 'it's a fundamentally conservative country' myth. I suspect they hate all this unprofessional BS except that they hated Hillary more, and with Pence as back-up are prepared to bail on the president a lot quicker than his 'base' is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goode trickle</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97054</link>
		<dc:creator>goode trickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 01:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97054</guid>
		<description>CW-

Interesting report card...

My only real knock is that you didn&#039;t point out that unlike other presidents, Trump, can actually create jobs, with amplification.

If Trump and his family were actually to bring the manufacture of all of their products back to the US and practice his mantra of &quot;buy American, hire American&quot; he would probably create only three or four thousand jobs tops. The big payoff however would be in the other associated industries that go into his products. Jobs would be created in paper products for packaging, container manufacture for his hotel amenities, jobs in Graphic design, Photography, and printing, as well as the trucking and logistics jobs that support trucking, not to mention the jobs in US ports that would be supported as well. A majority of these jobs are the very type that he bemoaned the decline of and promised to bring back, in regions that would benefit his support base directly.   

If he can go out and take credit for a few hundred jobs saved here and there, why isn&#039;t he going big and practicing what he preaches?  

On another note, I find it somewhat ironic that Trump winery has applied for permission to use the H2A visas... Which requires you to certify that there is a shortage of &quot;domestic workers&quot; that want the jobs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW-</p>
<p>Interesting report card...</p>
<p>My only real knock is that you didn't point out that unlike other presidents, Trump, can actually create jobs, with amplification.</p>
<p>If Trump and his family were actually to bring the manufacture of all of their products back to the US and practice his mantra of "buy American, hire American" he would probably create only three or four thousand jobs tops. The big payoff however would be in the other associated industries that go into his products. Jobs would be created in paper products for packaging, container manufacture for his hotel amenities, jobs in Graphic design, Photography, and printing, as well as the trucking and logistics jobs that support trucking, not to mention the jobs in US ports that would be supported as well. A majority of these jobs are the very type that he bemoaned the decline of and promised to bring back, in regions that would benefit his support base directly.   </p>
<p>If he can go out and take credit for a few hundred jobs saved here and there, why isn't he going big and practicing what he preaches?  </p>
<p>On another note, I find it somewhat ironic that Trump winery has applied for permission to use the H2A visas... Which requires you to certify that there is a shortage of "domestic workers" that want the jobs....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/22/trumps-first-two-months/#comment-97051</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13691#comment-97051</guid>
		<description>I think you left out Trump&#039;s budget attack on Meals on Wheels&#039; that could end the program in many areas and result in a large number of Trump supporters going without!  
That one shocked a lot of his elderly supporters!

The biggest problem with Trump&#039;s first two months is that he has lied so often and created discourse out of thin air for unknown reasons that now we can never be sure that if an actual threat to our nation occurs, we would believe him.  That is the scariest thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you left out Trump's budget attack on Meals on Wheels' that could end the program in many areas and result in a large number of Trump supporters going without!<br />
That one shocked a lot of his elderly supporters!</p>
<p>The biggest problem with Trump's first two months is that he has lied so often and created discourse out of thin air for unknown reasons that now we can never be sure that if an actual threat to our nation occurs, we would believe him.  That is the scariest thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
