Help me out here...

Ya LOVED to equivocate when NOT-45 is being accused of lying.... :D And, as much as I hate to admit it, you are more or less reasonable about it..

Weigh in here....

Did AG Sessions lie??

Did AG Sessions commit perjury??

“a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.”

Sessions answered:

“I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.”

Absolutely NOTHING about AG Sessions answer was false.. NOTHING was a lie..

It was ALL completely and 1000% factual and truthful...

Sessions didn't NEED to go into Senate meetings with the Russian ambassador because, as a sitting Senator, Franken would *KNOW* that such meetings between foreign officials and sitting Senators is routine and common place...

Franken asked about meetings that Sessions had with any Russian **"AS A SURROGATE OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN"** and AG Sessions answered honestly and truthfully that there were none..

Ya'all have been WRONG, WRONG, HYSTERICALLY WRONG about this whole thing...

As the **FACTS** clearly show....

Once again...

DDUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHH

Really??

FRANKEN: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, "Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump." These documents also allegedly say quote, "There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government."

Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

It's completely clear from YOUR OWN posting of Franken's question that it IS exactly what Franken was asking..

Thank you for proving your ignorance..

LEO who doesn't know the meaning of "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." Sad! #IgnorantLEO

And ignorant snowflake doesn't know the meaning of perjury or lying..

THAT is what is sad..

I've already stated that I did not believe the evidence so far rose to the level of perjury.

WOW.. You actually have a brain cell!

OF COURSE it's not perjury.... THAT is what I have been saying the WHOLE time...

Duuuuuhhhhh..

SESSIONS: "I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign, and the idea that I was part of a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government is totally false. That's the question that Senator Franken asked me during the committee hearing."

Answer: None

It's a real time saver when you provide the proof of your own ignorance. :) LOL

Anyone reading the transcript can plainly see that this is NOT the question that Senator Franken asked him; it's simply the question he wants everyone to think he was asked.

You have absolutely NO FACTS to support that Sessions lied or that Sessions committed perjury..

LEO who doesn't know the meaning of "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." Sad! #IgnorantLEO

Sessions is a lawyer who knows full well about disclosure, which is why he's already admitted he should have been more thorough in his answer and why he's taken steps to mischaracterize the question Franken actually asked him. It would be truthful if Sessions said he might have misunderstood the question, but it is a flat out fabrication for him to restate the actual question he was asked by Franken. I've already stated that I did not believe the evidence so far rose to the level of perjury. Try to keep up. :)

SESSIONS: "I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign, and the idea that I was part of a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government is totally false. That's the question that Senator Franken asked me during the committee hearing."

What part of that was a lie???

Answer: None

You have absolutely NO FACTS to support that Sessions lied or that Sessions committed perjury..

NONE... ZERO.... ZILCH.... NADA......

This is nothing but a Democrat hysterical attempt to attack President Trump..

Ya'all have PROVEN you don't care about lying over and over again because Dims lie all the time and you don't say boo...

So, what else could this be about, except for attacking President Trump with a useless hysterical nothing-berger...

You would be right..

Except for the fact that it has already been mutually agreed here in Weigantia by people with more than 2 brain cells to rub together that Candidates or Presidents are not responsible for the actions of their supporters..

If they were, then yer morons, Obama and NOT-45 would have been locked up a long time ago for his responsibility in all the riots and violence and destruction caused by his supporters..

I get it, I really do.. It's just too hard for you to put down the whine and sour grapes...

Your NOT-45 couldn't close the deal and Donald Trump is president..

These are the facts.. Deal with it..

There are checks and balances in our system. But the electorate also has the ability to override the checks and balances, by electing one party to all parts of government. We have done so. We knew the (R) stood for Russia when we did it.

We can't quite say that Russia won the elections fair and square. But they did win them, for every branch, at all levels above municipal, in a way that does not invalidate the outcomes. We have fixed terms, so short of the "second-amendment remedies" that Republicans used to like so much, we're stuck with Russia in charge.

My latest New Yorker magazine just arrived, and
the venerable Eustace Tilley annual cover has undergone a major makeover this spring.

Akh, Vladimir, khozyain fashistskoy Cheeto. :)

Juan Thompson did not include in his bomb threats: "I'm doing this because I'm a Democrat!" or "I'm threatening you because I vote for Progressives!" He's an asshole who's been stalking his girlfriend (who had the sense to break up with him), and who was FIRED by the Intercept for making stuff up.

You won't find Dem/Prog leaders or voters running around talking about how they applaud and support Thompson or his acts. But Trump holds rallies to praise his thugs.

FALSE EQUIVALENCY and refusal to admit Trump encourages thuggery and the GOP lets him do it.

http://static5.businessinsider.com/image/58b01b6701fe5818378b4a60-837

The FBI press release paints Thompson as a low hanging fruitcake with false flag motives against his ex- girlfriend. Still, it was terrorism, and cracking this case will a deterrent effect. Good job FBI and other agencies involved!

No, he did not..

He answered "NO"..

What part of full disclosure has you confused? What part of the "whole truth" is unclear to an LEO? Not only did Sessions lie in his confirmation hearing, he lied in his press conference when he volunteered:

SESSIONS: "I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign, and the idea that I was part of a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government is totally false. That's the question that Senator Franken asked me during the committee hearing."

A total BS lie from the Attorney General of the United States. Obviously, everyone understands that politicians lie, but why lie about something at the beginning of your press conference that is easily provable to be a complete and total fabrication? So what did Al Franken actually ask Sessions in his confirmation hearing?

*****

FRANKEN: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, "Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump." These documents also allegedly say quote, "There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government."

Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

SESSIONS: Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.

*****

Franken asked Sessions what he would do if the information CNN had reported were true. Sessions volunteered the false information, and he now admits to meeting with Russian officials... twice. So I ask you: What part of swearing to "tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" is confusing you? Sessions is also now saying that in retrospect he should have disclosed the meeting with the ambassador. It's no big secret that lawyers understand the concept of "full disclosure." LOL

https://youtu.be/saByf9QAmCY?t=10m18s

If you have ANY facts to support your claim that this is a lie, let's see them..

If you have any facts to support your claim that he didn't speak about the election, let's see them. And since we're talking about the United States Attorney General and proof: Did anyone... ANYONE... have any proof whatsoever regarding what Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch discussed on the tarmac? Not a living soul, including you, but the Trump advocates insisted it was nefarious... funny how that cuts both ways. :)

Now that the FACTS are aired, ANYONE who claims that Session lied is lying...

Anyone who insists he isn't lying under oath both orally and written when asked to provide the "truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" is either delusional or has never gone through a government security clearance. You don't have to be perfect to pass the clearance, but you are expected to provide the truth and give full disclosure. You can't have committed multiple felonies by violating a federal law thousands of times and expect to pass scrutiny, but if you've got a few dings, you're fine as long as you follow full disclosure and tell them before they find out about it. The issue isn't whether you're perfect; the issue is whether or not you're trustworthy. This ain't rocket science, Mr. LEO. He was under oath. :)

Juan Thompson was a reporter for The Intercept who was fired for fabricating quotes in his articles about a year and a half ago.

He mentioned his name when making some of the threats and tried to blame them on his ex-girlfriend.

Pretty amazing it took them so long to catch him after he identified himself.

It sounds like he may have a pretty good insanity defense though.

Unfortunately, he is only responsible for 8 of the threats, so someone else, or multiple people, are responsible for the other 100.

A

The video of Sessions responding to Franken is unambiguous. There weren't any weasely qualifiers.
Sessions lied under oath.

Denial and whataboutery qualify as different responses, just not valid ones.

A

Trumpers:
talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/brandon-davis-accused-running-down-men-sccoter

Anti-Trump Communist Arrested For Jewish Community Center Bomb Threats
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/03/anti-trump-communist-arrested-for-jewish-community-center-bomb-threats/#ixzz4aHywmNNx

Anti-Trumper... AKA Democrat NOT-45 Supporter...

"I can do this all day."
-Captain America

:D

Trumpers: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/brandon-davis-accused-running-down-men-sccoter

Anti-Trump Communist Arrested For Jewish Community Center Bomb Threats
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/03/anti-trump-communist-arrested-for-jewish-community-center-bomb-threats/#ixzz4aHywmNNx

Anti-Trumper... AKA Democrat NOT-45 Supporter...

"I can do this all day."
-Captain America

:D

“Yeah,” Pelosi responded.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-awkward-silence-pelosi-asked-shes-ever-met-russians/

Once again, Democrats are made to look like complete and utter fools...

They keep digging themselves deeper and deeper into a hole....

Wow.....

It's like I have always said.. Left Wingers are some of the most intolerant and mean and nasty people there are...

I just never thought I would see it put into practice so blatantly... ESPECIALLY when it's not directed at me...

The Constitution doesn't protect me from wading around crank speech, but TamperMonkey does.

Yea.. Gods forbid you should be exposed to ideas you don't like..

Run away to yer safe space, little snowflake.. :^/

Not so. You didn't speak early enough, and/or effectively enough to get your idea on the ballot. The Constitution doesn't give you a printing press, or a sales team, those elements are up to you. Free speech does not equate with equal speech. Not all speech is equal in the marketplace of ideas. You don't seem to get that.

You have been selling VV for some time. Nobody has stopped you from talking about, but as far as I can see, very few have bought into your idea. You have failed in the marketplace of free speech.

You are a crank. A crank has one idea. A crank is congenitally incapable of seeing basic flaws in their pet project. They can never produce working models of their ideas. They make links, but never make a working chain. The role call includes inventors of perpetual motion devices, anti-gravity fields, Way Back machines and utopian governments....

Sorry to break it to you, but that's how I see it.
The Constitution doesn't protect me from wading around crank speech, but TamperMonkey does.

Towhit, that the United States never properly ratified the treaty that acquired Texas blaa blaa blaa blaaa....

Even IF it's accurate, do you HONESTLY believe that people are going to upend the entire country over it??

It's the same with your explanation about elections being unconstitutional..

Even if it were factually accurate, do you honestly believe that the entire election process is going to be upended to radically change it to what you suggest??

Even if you are 10000% factually accurate??

Nope.. Not gonna happen.. :D

Basically reality beats theory any day of the week and twice on Sunday...

Sounds like a faux-left faux news commentator.
What's-his-name? Juan somebody...

Sounds like a DNC staffer....

Juan, Be thankful you are dealing with the US justice system. It beats having to deal with the long arm of Mossad.

Word.....

Juan Thompson, 31, Saint Louis MO. Generic Loser

Juan, Be thankful you are dealing with the US justice system. It beats having to deal with the long arm of Mossad.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Your issue, with paragraph structure:

" The issue of which candidate a citizen votes for in the general election in one election cycle and the issue of which party a citizen wants to vote to establish for the next election are two separate issues, for two separate elections."

OK, accept as written for sake of argument...

"The Supreme Court has ruled that contributing money is an act of free speech. If contributing money to a candidate, party or cause is free speech, then certainly voting for a candidate, party or cause is also free speech."

Paid advertising is free speech. Let's accept that voting is an act of free speech.....

"So the current election law is unconstitutional because it forces citizens to sacrifice their free speech on one of these issues in one election cycle in order to exercise their free speech in the other election cycle."

How so?

You get to vote in both cycles. You've exercised that aspect of free speech, if you choose to vote. You can comment on the election, you can complain it was unfair, all aspects of free speech. Free speech does not mean that YOUR free speaking ultimately sets the agenda. If it did, you would violate other peoples free speech by violating their personal agendas which disagree with yours.

Your free speech argument falls apart. Free speech gives you the right to argue argue about the rules.
It doesn't grant you the right to win.

I continue to ask, but NEVER have gotten an answer that is logical and factual..

WHERE is the "lie" that AG Sessions allegedly told??

Are you sure you didn't say that ten years ago ? :D

Abso-tively..

Because I know for a FACT that **NEVER** in my most wildest and fevered imaginations that I would come up with the wild idea that the entirety of the Left Wingery, including everyone here, would actually CHEER the Intelligence community as they worked to tear down the freely, duly and legally elected President Of The United States...

I would contend that no president has been fairly elected since before I started voting 40 years ago.

Depends on how one defines "fairly"...

But fairly is a fairly subjective word.

Yes it is.. :D

So the current election law is unconstitutional because it forces citizens to sacrifice their free speech on one of these issues in one election cycle in order to exercise their free speech in the other election cycle.

Forgive me, but that sounds like the kind of reasoning that Texans give that "proves" Texas is not really part of the United States...

It sounds logical, rational and reasonable, but it's completely incompatible with the here and now..

"Because only the Current Major Parties can win in the general election, they are the only ones that can get enough votes to qualify for major party status in the next election which makes them the only ones that can win that election. [ ] This is unconstitutional."

How is that unconstitutional? What articles/sections/amendments are being violated?

That's a hoot!

Has anybody else received e-mails from WH.gov with vague, yet glowing, accounts of how much Trump has accomplished in such a short time?

Each time I get one, I check the "take me off the list" box...but like everything else Trump I have ever encountered, it doesn't work as advertised.

I'm still calling every day, and not just my own reps (this abbreviation can be decoded as "representatives" or "reprehensibles" depending on the phone number).

When calling outside my state, I remind the staff member that his/her boss is, for practical purposes, represents everybody on the planet, not just ones who can vote him/her in or out of office. When I call small states, I add that their state gets more representation per voter than I do in my much more populous state. Staff are uniformly polite, I assume the calls are taped "for quality control."

Trump has opined that reporters should not be allowed to use anonymous sources. That privilege is apparently reserved for Lord Trump. I'll take that point up with the Ministry of Information...a Mr. Goebbels I believe.

"A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth" - Mr. G.

Thanx :D

TL;DR.

A-frakin'-men to that!

Look at yourselves... Ya'all are drooling with glee at the prospect of the US Intelligence Community is actively trying to take down a duly and legally elected President Of The United States...

Imagine, at the beginning of CW.COM over 10 years ago, if I would have told ya'all, "Ya know?? There will come a time when the US Intelligence Community will actively pursue and try to bring down a duly, legally and fairly elected POTUS and ya'all will not only support and condone such an action, you will actually do so with glee and happy abandon.."

Ya'all would have thought I was totally nuts..

And yet, that is EXACTLY what is happening..

Stig himself said as much.. Schumer said as much...

I don't recognize you people anymore...

And that's the sad and honest fact...

The Perjury Allegation against Jeff Sessions Is Meritless
http://tinyurl.com/jgw6hm7

To even CONSIDER a charge of perjury, it is up to the QUESTIONER to make absolutely crystal clear what the question is.. It's not up to the ANSWERER to make absolutely crystal clear what the answer is..

When it comes to perjury ANY ambiguity, no matter how slight, goes to proof of innocence...

AT WORST, Franken messed up and allowed enough ambiguity in the question to allow Sessions to answer honestly and truthfully if not completely...

You people have absolutely NO FACTS to support yer claim that Sessions committed perjury..

You people have absolutely NO FACTS to support yer claim that Sessions lied...

NONE... ZERO.... ZILCH.... NADA...

All ya'all have is hysterical TDS.... That's it...

Claire McCaskill ? @clairecmc
Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador. Upset about the arbitrary/cruel decision to end all US adoptions,even those in process.
10:25 AM - 30 Jan 2013

Senator McCaskill blatantly and unabashedly LIED...

Where is ya'all's condemnation of that??

Proof positive that LYING is NOT what ya'all care about..

Ya'all only care about attacking Trump, facts and reality be damned...

All of this is "NOTHING"..... So says a *Democrat* Senator!!

Once again, the Democrats are getting played by the hysterical Anti-Trump media...

There is, LITERALLY, nothing here....

What goes around, comes around my friends...

Karma's a bitch!! :D

Apparently, "whataboutery" is NOT my only response..

Unless of course, you mean, "Whataboutery the FACT that ya'all have absolutely NO FACTS to support ya'all's hysterical accusations"??

I guess one might call that a "whataboutery".. :D

What was it that was posted yesterday??

As with many things in a politically-divided America, it mostly depends on your politics as to how you saw this moment.

That's the WHOLE issue in a nutshell...

These are the facts, people..

All yer hysteria is nothing but fake news in a vane attempt to bring down President Trump..

That is ALL it is...

And, if AG Sessions had lied under oath, you would have a point..

But he didn't, so you don't..

No one here has posted ANY facts that show AG Sessions lying under oath..

And, if you don't have audio or video to back it up, it's nothing but fake news.. :D

So says a Weigantian Founder... :D

Sessions wouldn't lie under oath for no reason.

He knows the game.
He knows the consequences.
Yet he chose to lie anyway.
Why?

Isn't there a pamphlet for formers LEO's about who is allowed to lie under oath that starts and ends with the word "nobody"?
Is whataboutery your only response?

A

Except, in Benghazi, Americans actually died...

But RussiaGate won't have the staying power of Benghazi because A> No Americans died with Russia and 2> The Left Wingery is notoriously fickle and will find another bright and shiney to play with...

A number of his advisers believe Obama officials are behind the leaks and are seeking to undermine his presidency, with just the latest example coming from reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions met twice last year with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. and apparently misled senators about the interactions during his confirmation hearing.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-obama-appointees-advisers-purge-235629

Yep.. This is EXACTLY what needs to happen...

Clear out the treasonous scumbags...

After perusing some other outlets, I am glad to see that others (Franken, Klobuchar, etc.) are still demanding answers from Sessions despite his recusal.

Spicer lying to try to cover for Sessions lie is too funny... like his job wasn't hard enough already.

A

Democrat Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer continues to push the Russia conspiracy.
But it was Schumer who met with Putin in New York City – not Trump.
http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/shumer-putin-575x328.jpg

Where's the outrage??? Where's the hysteria???

Oh.. That's right.. Schumer has a '-D' after his name so it's perfectly acceptable...

Once again.. I wish ya'all could take a step back and see how utterly ridiculous ya'all look screaming, "THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING!!! THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING!!!"

:D

And, you can PROVE that, right?? :^/

Is this guy as stupid as he looks (rhetorical question).

Ahhhh the epitome of Left Wingery "tolerance"... Attacking a person for how they look...

Why are you complaining??

Pence is the guy ya'all want to be President... :^/

Where was all ya'all's anti-Russia hysteria when candidate Romney warned us about Russia being our number one geopolitical foe??

The facts CLEARLY show that ya'all don't care about Russia or are concerned about anything to do with Russia..

The facts clearly show that you just want to attack President Trump and Russia is the latest convenient excuse to do so..

And yes.. The Russia faux-scandal will be gone as soon as ya'all find something new and exciting to attack the President over..

Who would have thunked that ya'all would be acting EXACTLY like the hysterical rabid attack dogs ya'all accused the Republicans of being over Obama??

Oh wait.. I think it was me!! :D

You've mentioned your efforts to call congresscritters...

https://theintercept.com/2017/03/02/wisconsin-republican-senator-sends-cease-and-desist-letter-to-constituent-for-calling-too-much/

A

If Sessions met with the Russian ambassador on matters of Senate business, what was it?

He claims he didn't discuss the campaign, so what were they talking about?
Did he ask for the meetings or did the ambassador?
If it was the former, was it private initiative or at the request of someone else?
If private initiative, why?
If someone else, who?
Was it a large campaign donor?
Why wasn't the committee informed?

It seems like these questions need to be answered even now that Sessions has recused himself.
It may not be Trump campaign related, but something stinks.

A

Are we to believe that while the gals were out and about taking pics and posting them on Instagram to make the trip seem credible, that Jared wasn't meeting with Putin's people? Maybe they should be asked if Trump's campaign had any "indirect" contact with Russia during the campaign?

What about Elmer Fudd?

Sessions had too much hair. I'd love to see actor Leslie Jordan (he played the Republican-closet case Beverly Leslie on Will & Grace) portray Sessions on SNL. He sounds just like him.

I don't think Russia is one of Trump's misdirections, especially since Sessions has recused himself from overseeing any investigations into Putin-puppet's campaign. This is way too embarrassing for Trump!

Vice President Mike Pence routinely used a private email account to conduct public business as governor of Indiana, at times discussing sensitive matters and homeland security issues.

As we know, in Republicanland the only person who is damned to hell for using a private email account is Hillary Clinton -- Republicans are doing it all over the place right now in Trumps administration, and Saint Pence was using AOL while gov of the unfortunates in Indiana.

Is this guy as stupid as he looks (rhetorical question).

It looks like the real patriots are the people who haven't been working with the Russians. Like me, for instance ;)

Currently the Republicans are cosy in their belief that they have a "Red Wall" protecting their Senate and House majorities, but we have seen how quickly these walls can collapse.

We all knew 45 was a con man, but the venality of the Republican "royalty" is a surprise to me - they are turning out to be even bigger pond scum than I anticipated.

This could save Nixon's relative reputation - we could have an even more corrupt White House in the making.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/258822537/ernie-keebler.jpg

It may take a bit of Elfin magic to avoid doing some jail time....he flat out lied under oath, on video. To Al Franken. I suspect Session's resignation will be on Trump's desk in a few days.

Reading a speech like a normal person got Trump one good day.

"Or perhaps some other people noticing how much Sessions resembles a well-loved cartoon character."

But then I decided that was too snarky. Heh.

-CW