<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legalization&#039;s March Continues, With Or Without Democrats To Lead It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89752</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 19:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89752</guid>
		<description>Troll
63

I could have sworn that you admitted in the Ford discussion that incentives and tax breaks to subsidize keeping jobs in the US would mean Trump was not worthy of praise... are you flip flopping already?

Purchased corporate &quot;loyalty&quot; isn&#039;t actual loyalty or American greatness. 

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troll<br />
63</p>
<p>I could have sworn that you admitted in the Ford discussion that incentives and tax breaks to subsidize keeping jobs in the US would mean Trump was not worthy of praise... are you flip flopping already?</p>
<p>Purchased corporate "loyalty" isn't actual loyalty or American greatness. </p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [417] -- Turkey Leftovers &#124; Politic Portal</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89716</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [417] -- Turkey Leftovers &#124; Politic Portal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 06:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89716</guid>
		<description>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week , if anyone&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week , if anyone&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [417] - Turkey Leftovers - epeak.in</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89706</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [417] - Turkey Leftovers - epeak.in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 03:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89706</guid>
		<description>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#039;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#39;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [417] &#8212; Turkey Leftovers &#8211; Rincon News</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89705</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [417] &#8212; Turkey Leftovers &#8211; Rincon News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 03:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89705</guid>
		<description>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [417] &#8212; Turkey Leftovers &#124; BuzzJour</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89704</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [417] &#8212; Turkey Leftovers &#124; BuzzJour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 02:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89704</guid>
		<description>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [417] - Turkey Leftovers - Democratsnewz</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89702</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [417] - Turkey Leftovers - Democratsnewz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89702</guid>
		<description>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [417] &#8212; Turkey Leftovers &#8211; LibertyREDUX</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89701</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [417] &#8212; Turkey Leftovers &#8211; LibertyREDUX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 02:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89701</guid>
		<description>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some rather disappointing things to say about marijuana legalization (which we addressed in detail earlier this week, if anyone&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [417] -- Turkey Leftovers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89695</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [417] -- Turkey Leftovers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 00:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89695</guid>
		<description>[...] Legalization&#8217;s March Continues, With Or Without Democrats To Lead It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legalization&#8217;s March Continues, With Or Without Democrats To Lead It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89643</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89643</guid>
		<description>http://www.salon.com/2016/12/01/calling-jeff-sessions-racist-conveniently-ignores-the-work-hes-done-for-alabamas-black-community/

A SALON commentary in SUPPORT of Attorney General Sessions???

The Trump Effect!!  It&#039;s gotta be!!  :D

057</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2016/12/01/calling-jeff-sessions-racist-conveniently-ignores-the-work-hes-done-for-alabamas-black-community/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/2016/12/01/calling-jeff-sessions-racist-conveniently-ignores-the-work-hes-done-for-alabamas-black-community/</a></p>
<p>A SALON commentary in SUPPORT of Attorney General Sessions???</p>
<p>The Trump Effect!!  It's gotta be!!  :D</p>
<p>057</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89642</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89642</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;With Carrier coup, Donald Trump offers a window into his presidency

President-elect Donald Trump is sending a direct and simple message: “America is back in business.”
Weeks before even taking the oath of office, Mr. Trump on Thursday struck a deal with Carrier Corp. to keep 1,000 manufacturing jobs in Indiana that the company had planned to move to Mexico. During the Obama administration, there were more stories about jobs leaving the United States than those that were staying.
Mr. Trump’s determination to personally woo American businesses to stay put and re-energize the American economy could become the cornerstone of his time in office. The Trump-Carrier deal is a positive step in preserving jobs in America and encouraging a healthy dialogue between companies and the government. It’s about figuring out the incentives that motivate companies to stay. And what we are learning is that with Mr. Trump, this is not just a one-time offer but a “package deal” where companies will find a business-friendly environment, actively nurtured by the government, that leads them naturally to invest in American workers.&lt;/B&gt;
-http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/1/carrier-coup-show-how-trump-will-lead/

I see Trump re-elected in 2020 with 70% of the popular vote and the biggest landslide since Reagan....   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>With Carrier coup, Donald Trump offers a window into his presidency</p>
<p>President-elect Donald Trump is sending a direct and simple message: “America is back in business.”<br />
Weeks before even taking the oath of office, Mr. Trump on Thursday struck a deal with Carrier Corp. to keep 1,000 manufacturing jobs in Indiana that the company had planned to move to Mexico. During the Obama administration, there were more stories about jobs leaving the United States than those that were staying.<br />
Mr. Trump’s determination to personally woo American businesses to stay put and re-energize the American economy could become the cornerstone of his time in office. The Trump-Carrier deal is a positive step in preserving jobs in America and encouraging a healthy dialogue between companies and the government. It’s about figuring out the incentives that motivate companies to stay. And what we are learning is that with Mr. Trump, this is not just a one-time offer but a “package deal” where companies will find a business-friendly environment, actively nurtured by the government, that leads them naturally to invest in American workers.</b><br />
-http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/1/carrier-coup-show-how-trump-will-lead/</p>
<p>I see Trump re-elected in 2020 with 70% of the popular vote and the biggest landslide since Reagan....   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89640</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89640</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why ya&#039;all are so worried about Trump&#039;s appointments??

All the Democrats have to do is filibuster Trump&#039;s nominees and they will never see office...

Oh... Wait.....   :D

I said at the time that Democrats would regret some day getting rid of the filibuster for nominees...

Looks like today is that day....

http://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-send-their-regrets-1480638965

055</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know why ya'all are so worried about Trump's appointments??</p>
<p>All the Democrats have to do is filibuster Trump's nominees and they will never see office...</p>
<p>Oh... Wait.....   :D</p>
<p>I said at the time that Democrats would regret some day getting rid of the filibuster for nominees...</p>
<p>Looks like today is that day....</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-send-their-regrets-1480638965" rel="nofollow">http://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-send-their-regrets-1480638965</a></p>
<p>055</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89638</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89638</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;On &quot;Mad Dog&quot; - one small problem: there&#039;s a law that says that he can&#039;t have the job without an act of congress to waiver it. The only time that Congress ever did that (for Gen. George Marshall, because of the Marshall Plan, which was still very much an ongoing thing back then), the writers of the bill included a &#039;signing statement&#039; that said that a waiver of that sort should never happen again.&lt;/I&gt;

The GOP owns Congress...

The waiver will be issued...

&lt;I.So Trump is now taking credit for something he didn&#039;t do (like he does when he slaps his name on hotels that he didn&#039;t build), that didn&#039;t even do what he (and Pence) said it did. Just tens of thousands of dollars to a company that essentially shipped a bunch of jobs to Mexico anyway.&lt;/I&gt;

Yet, all the Carrier leadership, all the Carrier employees whose jobs were saved, everyone knows that Trump DID do something..  Maybe not EVERYTHING but Trump surely accomplished something that Hillary NEVER would have done..

Actually saved some jobs...

Would Hillary had gone to Carrier and made the deal??? 

No...

No matter how much you deny it, Trump done did a good thing...

053</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>On "Mad Dog" - one small problem: there's a law that says that he can't have the job without an act of congress to waiver it. The only time that Congress ever did that (for Gen. George Marshall, because of the Marshall Plan, which was still very much an ongoing thing back then), the writers of the bill included a 'signing statement' that said that a waiver of that sort should never happen again.</i></p>
<p>The GOP owns Congress...</p>
<p>The waiver will be issued...</p>
<p>&lt;I.So Trump is now taking credit for something he didn&#039;t do (like he does when he slaps his name on hotels that he didn&#039;t build), that didn&#039;t even do what he (and Pence) said it did. Just tens of thousands of dollars to a company that essentially shipped a bunch of jobs to Mexico anyway.</p>
<p>Yet, all the Carrier leadership, all the Carrier employees whose jobs were saved, everyone knows that Trump DID do something..  Maybe not EVERYTHING but Trump surely accomplished something that Hillary NEVER would have done..</p>
<p>Actually saved some jobs...</p>
<p>Would Hillary had gone to Carrier and made the deal??? </p>
<p>No...</p>
<p>No matter how much you deny it, Trump done did a good thing...</p>
<p>053</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89633</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89633</guid>
		<description>Re: Pot

Obama could remove marijuana from the list of drugs subject to federal control with a stroke of his pen.  His timidity on this issue hasn&#039;t been the high point of his administration.

And if he had real balls, he&#039;d delay the Supreme Court fight for another year by making a recess appointment of Garland to the Court when Congress takes its obligatory recess later this month. It would spark outrage on the Right, but really, who cares, other than news anchors I don&#039;t watch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Pot</p>
<p>Obama could remove marijuana from the list of drugs subject to federal control with a stroke of his pen.  His timidity on this issue hasn't been the high point of his administration.</p>
<p>And if he had real balls, he'd delay the Supreme Court fight for another year by making a recess appointment of Garland to the Court when Congress takes its obligatory recess later this month. It would spark outrage on the Right, but really, who cares, other than news anchors I don't watch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89632</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89632</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Insurers are already dropping out of TrainWreckCare in droves..&lt;/i&gt;

Sure they are. Think about who the Affordable Care Act is designed to curb: insurance companies, medical equipment suppliers, pharmaceutical companies and privately owned Hospitals, each guilty of having hiked prices and reduced services (and of gaming the system) to serve their bottom lines, which collectively drives the upward spiral in Health care costs. Great for stock prices, lousy for consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Insurers are already dropping out of TrainWreckCare in droves..</i></p>
<p>Sure they are. Think about who the Affordable Care Act is designed to curb: insurance companies, medical equipment suppliers, pharmaceutical companies and privately owned Hospitals, each guilty of having hiked prices and reduced services (and of gaming the system) to serve their bottom lines, which collectively drives the upward spiral in Health care costs. Great for stock prices, lousy for consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89630</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89630</guid>
		<description>On &quot;Mad Dog&quot; - one small problem: there&#039;s a law that says that he can&#039;t have the job without an act of congress to waiver it. The only time that Congress ever did that (for Gen. George Marshall, because of the Marshall Plan, which was still very much an ongoing thing back then), the writers of the bill included a &#039;signing statement&#039; that said that a waiver of that sort should never happen again.

As for Carrier, it seems that despite Trump&#039;s and Pence&#039;s (mostly Pense&#039;s) best efforts, Carrier is still shutting down a plant in Indiana, and sending 1400 jobs to Mexico. So Trump is now taking credit for something he didn&#039;t do (like he does when he slaps his name on hotels that he didn&#039;t build), that didn&#039;t even do what he (and Pence) said it did. Just tens of thousands of dollars to a company that essentially shipped a bunch of jobs to Mexico anyway.
If Trump wants to really save jobs, he could save a bunch by moving all of his branded products currently being made in other countries back to this country, while he&#039;s still personally in charge of his own company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On "Mad Dog" - one small problem: there's a law that says that he can't have the job without an act of congress to waiver it. The only time that Congress ever did that (for Gen. George Marshall, because of the Marshall Plan, which was still very much an ongoing thing back then), the writers of the bill included a 'signing statement' that said that a waiver of that sort should never happen again.</p>
<p>As for Carrier, it seems that despite Trump's and Pence's (mostly Pense's) best efforts, Carrier is still shutting down a plant in Indiana, and sending 1400 jobs to Mexico. So Trump is now taking credit for something he didn't do (like he does when he slaps his name on hotels that he didn't build), that didn't even do what he (and Pence) said it did. Just tens of thousands of dollars to a company that essentially shipped a bunch of jobs to Mexico anyway.<br />
If Trump wants to really save jobs, he could save a bunch by moving all of his branded products currently being made in other countries back to this country, while he's still personally in charge of his own company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89629</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89629</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;There is no delay. Without a strong commitment to Obamacare in its present form it will fall apart in late 2017 as many insurers drop out of 2018 markets.&lt;/I&gt;

Uhh.. Insurers are already dropping out of TrainWreckCare in droves..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is no delay. Without a strong commitment to Obamacare in its present form it will fall apart in late 2017 as many insurers drop out of 2018 markets.</i></p>
<p>Uhh.. Insurers are already dropping out of TrainWreckCare in droves..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89628</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89628</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;One off&quot; my left arse cheek!!! :D&lt;/I&gt;

We are starting to get some of the details. A $7M tax break.

You really think Trump is going to offer every company that announces they are moving jobs to Mexico a tax relief package?

This, by the way, is what Trump ridiculed state governments for earlier this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"One off" my left arse cheek!!! :D</i></p>
<p>We are starting to get some of the details. A $7M tax break.</p>
<p>You really think Trump is going to offer every company that announces they are moving jobs to Mexico a tax relief package?</p>
<p>This, by the way, is what Trump ridiculed state governments for earlier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89627</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89627</guid>
		<description>Hey CW

Big Money horning in on the business is negative.
The idea that Dems should be chasing their donations is misguided.
MJ was criminalized unjustly, and it shouldn&#039;t be legalized for the wrong reasons.

Politicians would be better off championing the ides of lots of small growers, and fighting for home growers rights... you mentioned Ohio, but increasing regulation to achieve the same effect is a real threat everywhere and is occurring.

Credibility is the currency worth chasing.
The morality of the new approach, and lack thereof in the current policy should be coupled with the same morality distinctions we see between home grown or farmers market tomato&#039;s and the bland red things they sell in grocery stores. A politician cheering for a grocery store tomato isn&#039;t credible.

Your talk of PAC money is missing the boat... those taking it should be doubted.
You&#039;re railing on Obama and Hillary while actually embracing what sunk Hillary.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey CW</p>
<p>Big Money horning in on the business is negative.<br />
The idea that Dems should be chasing their donations is misguided.<br />
MJ was criminalized unjustly, and it shouldn't be legalized for the wrong reasons.</p>
<p>Politicians would be better off championing the ides of lots of small growers, and fighting for home growers rights... you mentioned Ohio, but increasing regulation to achieve the same effect is a real threat everywhere and is occurring.</p>
<p>Credibility is the currency worth chasing.<br />
The morality of the new approach, and lack thereof in the current policy should be coupled with the same morality distinctions we see between home grown or farmers market tomato's and the bland red things they sell in grocery stores. A politician cheering for a grocery store tomato isn't credible.</p>
<p>Your talk of PAC money is missing the boat... those taking it should be doubted.<br />
You're railing on Obama and Hillary while actually embracing what sunk Hillary.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89626</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89626</guid>
		<description>Surely Trump can&#039;t be stupid enough to allow congress to vote for &quot;Repeal and Delay&quot; (of Obamacare)?

Insurance companies are going to hightail it leaving Trump with no legislation and millions of furious Americans.

There is no delay. Without a strong commitment to Obamacare in its present form it will fall apart in late 2017 as many insurers drop out of 2018 markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely Trump can't be stupid enough to allow congress to vote for "Repeal and Delay" (of Obamacare)?</p>
<p>Insurance companies are going to hightail it leaving Trump with no legislation and millions of furious Americans.</p>
<p>There is no delay. Without a strong commitment to Obamacare in its present form it will fall apart in late 2017 as many insurers drop out of 2018 markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89625</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 01:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89625</guid>
		<description>Interesting read

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/22/who-exactly-is-the-white-working-class-and-what-do-they-believe-good-questions/?utm_term=.c78287bef32a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read</p>
<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/22/who-exactly-is-the-white-working-class-and-what-do-they-believe-good-questions/?utm_term=.c78287bef32a" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/22/who-exactly-is-the-white-working-class-and-what-do-they-believe-good-questions/?utm_term=.c78287bef32a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goode trickle</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89624</link>
		<dc:creator>goode trickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 01:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89624</guid>
		<description>Mattis gets my vote...He is a good man and should perform well if and this is a big IF ... Congress listens to him and doesn&#039;t force obsolete weapons platforms on him. 

Now Flynn on the other hand I do not want anywhere near our government... It does not sit well with me that he is a regular mouthpiece on RT and his convictions change with the pay coming in from his clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mattis gets my vote...He is a good man and should perform well if and this is a big IF ... Congress listens to him and doesn't force obsolete weapons platforms on him. </p>
<p>Now Flynn on the other hand I do not want anywhere near our government... It does not sit well with me that he is a regular mouthpiece on RT and his convictions change with the pay coming in from his clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89623</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 23:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89623</guid>
		<description>So is Trump going to Pakistan or not?

He really need a Diplomacy 101 class fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is Trump going to Pakistan or not?</p>
<p>He really need a Diplomacy 101 class fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89622</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89622</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I&#039;ve been reading up on Matts and I like him. He isn&#039;t the clown his quotes make him out to be, plus he admits he runs his mouth off. He&#039;ll be good.&lt;/I&gt;

Common ground!!   :D

&lt;I&gt;Flynn is another story. He&#039;s all gut and too little brain.&lt;/I&gt;

I have to admit that I am not a big Flynn fan..

Hopefully Trump will keep him grounded..  :D

heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I've been reading up on Matts and I like him. He isn't the clown his quotes make him out to be, plus he admits he runs his mouth off. He'll be good.</i></p>
<p>Common ground!!   :D</p>
<p><i>Flynn is another story. He's all gut and too little brain.</i></p>
<p>I have to admit that I am not a big Flynn fan..</p>
<p>Hopefully Trump will keep him grounded..  :D</p>
<p>heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89621</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89621</guid>
		<description>Flynn is another story. He&#039;s all gut and too little brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flynn is another story. He's all gut and too little brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89620</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89620</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading up on Matts and I like him. He isn&#039;t the clown his quotes make him out to be, plus he admits he runs his mouth off. He&#039;ll be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been reading up on Matts and I like him. He isn't the clown his quotes make him out to be, plus he admits he runs his mouth off. He'll be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89619</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89619</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;To the best of my knowledge MJ causes damage in developing brains much worse than alcohol..&lt;I&gt;

Neither is proven worse than the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To the best of my knowledge MJ causes damage in developing brains much worse than alcohol..</i><i></p>
<p>Neither is proven worse than the other.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89618</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89618</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;“Companies are not going to leave the United States anymore without consequences. It’s not going to happen.”&lt;/B&gt;
-President-Elect Donald Trump

Ooorrraaaaaaa!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>“Companies are not going to leave the United States anymore without consequences. It’s not going to happen.”</b><br />
-President-Elect Donald Trump</p>
<p>Ooorrraaaaaaa!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89617</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89617</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I&#039;d also like to outlaw tobacco completely.

Agreed?&lt;/I&gt;

oh yea... DEFINITELY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'd also like to outlaw tobacco completely.</p>
<p>Agreed?</i></p>
<p>oh yea... DEFINITELY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89616</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89616</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Oh, and the laws for selling MJ and alcohol to minors must be the same. &lt;/I&gt;

To the best of my knowledge MJ causes damage in developing brains much worse than alcohol..

Therefore the penalty should be greater...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh, and the laws for selling MJ and alcohol to minors must be the same. </i></p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge MJ causes damage in developing brains much worse than alcohol..</p>
<p>Therefore the penalty should be greater...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89615</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89615</guid>
		<description>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-chosen-retired-marine-gen-james-mattis-for-secretary-of-defense/2016/12/01/6c6b3b74-aff9-11e6-be1c-8cec35b1ad25_story.html?utm_term=.fbf004ccaa7f

YES!!!!!!

&lt;B&gt;Time to kick ass and chew bubble gum!!! And I&#039;m all outta bubble gum...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Duke Nuke&#039;em

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-chosen-retired-marine-gen-james-mattis-for-secretary-of-defense/2016/12/01/6c6b3b74-aff9-11e6-be1c-8cec35b1ad25_story.html?utm_term=.fbf004ccaa7f" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-chosen-retired-marine-gen-james-mattis-for-secretary-of-defense/2016/12/01/6c6b3b74-aff9-11e6-be1c-8cec35b1ad25_story.html?utm_term=.fbf004ccaa7f</a></p>
<p>YES!!!!!!</p>
<p><b>Time to kick ass and chew bubble gum!!! And I'm all outta bubble gum..."</b><br />
-Duke Nuke'em</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89614</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89614</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the laws for selling MJ and alcohol to minors must be the same. Giving a 20 year old a Bud should have the same penalty regardless of what type of Bud ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the laws for selling MJ and alcohol to minors must be the same. Giving a 20 year old a Bud should have the same penalty regardless of what type of Bud ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89613</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89613</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll go with the legalization for the same age as alcohol since both impact the developing brain.

I&#039;d also like to outlaw tobacco completely. 

Agreed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll go with the legalization for the same age as alcohol since both impact the developing brain.</p>
<p>I'd also like to outlaw tobacco completely. </p>
<p>Agreed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89612</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89612</guid>
		<description>Because that&#039;s supported by the science..

And we&#039;re all about the science here... 

Right??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because that's supported by the science..</p>
<p>And we're all about the science here... </p>
<p>Right??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89610</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89610</guid>
		<description>Don,

But as I said.. I would support recreational legalization for those older than 25....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>But as I said.. I would support recreational legalization for those older than 25....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89609</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89609</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Repeating the debunked argument that it should be illegal because it is illegal has convinced me!&lt;/I&gt;

I never said that...

I said that, as the person I am, it&#039;s illegal and that&#039;s all I need to know...  If you had seen the results of this &quot;victim-less&quot; drug that I have, you would likely feel the same way..

&lt;I&gt;But your failure to provide any victim, provide the reason why it should be illegal or actually address my points has convinced me.&lt;/I&gt;

Remember Dragnet???

&lt;I&gt;Oh wait- that only works on me on the sixth Thursday of any given month.&lt;/I&gt;

I don&#039;t care if it&#039;s yer time of the month or not..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Repeating the debunked argument that it should be illegal because it is illegal has convinced me!</i></p>
<p>I never said that...</p>
<p>I said that, as the person I am, it's illegal and that's all I need to know...  If you had seen the results of this "victim-less" drug that I have, you would likely feel the same way..</p>
<p><i>But your failure to provide any victim, provide the reason why it should be illegal or actually address my points has convinced me.</i></p>
<p>Remember Dragnet???</p>
<p><i>Oh wait- that only works on me on the sixth Thursday of any given month.</i></p>
<p>I don't care if it's yer time of the month or not..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89607</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89607</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Yet, he ALSO admits the damage it causes in people under 25...&lt;/I&gt;

So, here&#039;s my proposal...

I&#039;ll support legalization of marijuana for anyone older than 25 years old...

But keep in place harsh penalties for those caught with marijuana who are 25 or under and harsh penalties for those who sell to those 25 and under....

Following the science, right?? 

How popular do you think the legalization push would be THEN, eh??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yet, he ALSO admits the damage it causes in people under 25...</i></p>
<p>So, here's my proposal...</p>
<p>I'll support legalization of marijuana for anyone older than 25 years old...</p>
<p>But keep in place harsh penalties for those caught with marijuana who are 25 or under and harsh penalties for those who sell to those 25 and under....</p>
<p>Following the science, right?? </p>
<p>How popular do you think the legalization push would be THEN, eh??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89606</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89606</guid>
		<description>Check out the D.A.R.E. episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the D.A.R.E. episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89605</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89605</guid>
		<description>Probably, like alcohol, it isn&#039;t a good idea for kids. Should be legal like alcohol for adults however.

You should check out some of the other episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably, like alcohol, it isn't a good idea for kids. Should be legal like alcohol for adults however.</p>
<p>You should check out some of the other episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89604</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 19:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89604</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; (Michale, guess which character you are ;)&lt;/I&gt;

Yep... That would be me!   :D

But it&#039;s funny...  This guy goes on and on about marijuana is safe...  He says that many MANY times.

Yet, he ALSO admits the damage it causes in people under 25...

So, which is it???

Is it safe?? Or does it cause brain damage in kids and young adults??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> (Michale, guess which character you are ;)</i></p>
<p>Yep... That would be me!   :D</p>
<p>But it's funny...  This guy goes on and on about marijuana is safe...  He says that many MANY times.</p>
<p>Yet, he ALSO admits the damage it causes in people under 25...</p>
<p>So, which is it???</p>
<p>Is it safe?? Or does it cause brain damage in kids and young adults??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89602</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89602</guid>
		<description>BTW, check out the cop at the end of the A.R.E. clip (Michale, guess which character you are ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, check out the cop at the end of the A.R.E. clip (Michale, guess which character you are ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89601</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89601</guid>
		<description>Does anybody else watch &quot;Adam Ruins Everything&quot;?

Bloody hilarious, and well fact checked.

Here is the reason MJ is illegal:

http://www.trutv.com/shows/adam-ruins-everything/videos/the-sinister-reason-weed-is-illegal.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody else watch "Adam Ruins Everything"?</p>
<p>Bloody hilarious, and well fact checked.</p>
<p>Here is the reason MJ is illegal:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trutv.com/shows/adam-ruins-everything/videos/the-sinister-reason-weed-is-illegal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.trutv.com/shows/adam-ruins-everything/videos/the-sinister-reason-weed-is-illegal.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89600</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89600</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Irrelevant. You are lumping it in with all drugs to avoid discussing marijuana specifically.&lt;/I&gt;

Until such time as the law changes across the land, it&#039;s an illegal drug...

&lt;I&gt;As nielm demonstrated in comments 12 and 14 the slippery slope works the same both for and against your position.&lt;/I&gt;

Actually Neil applied the slippery slope to alcohol, not against my position..

I am just a knuckle dragging ground pounder cop type guy...  If something is illegal, there is usually a pretty good reason WHY it&#039;s illegal...

If someone wants to make the argument that alcohol should be illegal, fine...   That is an argument with some merit...

Once the law gets around to being universally changed, that&#039;s great....

But claiming it&#039;s a victim-less crime is not a valid argument.  Because my own personal experiences lay lie to that claim... 

Yes, a person who smoked pot made it to be President of the United States..

But does that President want his daughters smoking pot??

Of course not..

Why??

Because it&#039;s a bad bad thing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Irrelevant. You are lumping it in with all drugs to avoid discussing marijuana specifically.</i></p>
<p>Until such time as the law changes across the land, it's an illegal drug...</p>
<p><i>As nielm demonstrated in comments 12 and 14 the slippery slope works the same both for and against your position.</i></p>
<p>Actually Neil applied the slippery slope to alcohol, not against my position..</p>
<p>I am just a knuckle dragging ground pounder cop type guy...  If something is illegal, there is usually a pretty good reason WHY it's illegal...</p>
<p>If someone wants to make the argument that alcohol should be illegal, fine...   That is an argument with some merit...</p>
<p>Once the law gets around to being universally changed, that's great....</p>
<p>But claiming it's a victim-less crime is not a valid argument.  Because my own personal experiences lay lie to that claim... </p>
<p>Yes, a person who smoked pot made it to be President of the United States..</p>
<p>But does that President want his daughters smoking pot??</p>
<p>Of course not..</p>
<p>Why??</p>
<p>Because it's a bad bad thing....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89598</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89598</guid>
		<description>Troo...  :D  Hokay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troo...  :D  Hokay...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89597</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89597</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going around and around on gun control again - we&#039;ve bored everybody on that already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not going around and around on gun control again - we've bored everybody on that already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89596</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89596</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m fine with it. So long as all firearms are registered and there are lower insurance rates for people who opt out of open carry.&lt;/I&gt;

Registering weapons that sit in safe is ridiculous and would violate the 2nd Amendment, IMNSHO....  I think the SCOTUS will rule this way, if a case ever makes it that far..

The PERSON would be registered, not the weapon he or she chooses to carry...

Having liability insurance for those weapons that sit in a safe or on display is also ridiculous..

It would be like having liability insurance for a car that sits in a museum...  Ridiculous....

If you carry or drive, I can see where a liability insurance requirement  is logical and rational..

If you don&#039;t carry or drive, if you have your weapon or car in permanent display mode, liability insurance makes absolutely no sense..

But rather than tie up another commentary with a gun debate, wanna move it back a few???  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'm fine with it. So long as all firearms are registered and there are lower insurance rates for people who opt out of open carry.</i></p>
<p>Registering weapons that sit in safe is ridiculous and would violate the 2nd Amendment, IMNSHO....  I think the SCOTUS will rule this way, if a case ever makes it that far..</p>
<p>The PERSON would be registered, not the weapon he or she chooses to carry...</p>
<p>Having liability insurance for those weapons that sit in a safe or on display is also ridiculous..</p>
<p>It would be like having liability insurance for a car that sits in a museum...  Ridiculous....</p>
<p>If you carry or drive, I can see where a liability insurance requirement  is logical and rational..</p>
<p>If you don't carry or drive, if you have your weapon or car in permanent display mode, liability insurance makes absolutely no sense..</p>
<p>But rather than tie up another commentary with a gun debate, wanna move it back a few???  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89595</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89595</guid>
		<description>My point was about manufacturing jobs. We are basically at full employment at the moment (5%) but the whining is about the types of jobs - particularly for non-graduate men. Manufacturing jobs are a heuristic for well paid &quot;manly&quot; jobs that don&#039;t require a university degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point was about manufacturing jobs. We are basically at full employment at the moment (5%) but the whining is about the types of jobs - particularly for non-graduate men. Manufacturing jobs are a heuristic for well paid "manly" jobs that don't require a university degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89594</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89594</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;How do you know? I never saw anything about significant layoffs, especially not manufacturing jobs.&lt;/I&gt;

Jobs are jobs..  Doesn&#039;t have to be manufacturing jobs...  At least, that&#039;s my take...

But, regardless, I think it shows Trump being a hands on POTUS, especially in areas of business that he is well-versed in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How do you know? I never saw anything about significant layoffs, especially not manufacturing jobs.</i></p>
<p>Jobs are jobs..  Doesn't have to be manufacturing jobs...  At least, that's my take...</p>
<p>But, regardless, I think it shows Trump being a hands on POTUS, especially in areas of business that he is well-versed in...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89593</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89593</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Neil,

Regarding the gun issue, I had an idea today...

How would you feel about a national Open Carry law that would require registration?? And I might even go so far as to accede to liability insurance as long as it&#039;s not overly onerous... IE that the goal is to provide for liability rather than making it too onerous so no one CAN carry...

What you think??&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m fine with it. So long as all firearms are registered and there are lower insurance rates for people who opt out of open carry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Neil,</p>
<p>Regarding the gun issue, I had an idea today...</p>
<p>How would you feel about a national Open Carry law that would require registration?? And I might even go so far as to accede to liability insurance as long as it's not overly onerous... IE that the goal is to provide for liability rather than making it too onerous so no one CAN carry...</p>
<p>What you think??</i></p>
<p>I'm fine with it. So long as all firearms are registered and there are lower insurance rates for people who opt out of open carry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89592</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89592</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Trump is going to sit down with them and hammer out a BETTER deal for employees that might be adversely affected by the merger..&lt;/i&gt;

How do you know? I never saw anything about significant layoffs, especially not manufacturing jobs.

I think the deal should be blocked because it will concentrate too much media power in one company, but there will need to be a good case made to stand up in court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump is going to sit down with them and hammer out a BETTER deal for employees that might be adversely affected by the merger..</i></p>
<p>How do you know? I never saw anything about significant layoffs, especially not manufacturing jobs.</p>
<p>I think the deal should be blocked because it will concentrate too much media power in one company, but there will need to be a good case made to stand up in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89590</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89590</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;You know me, Michale ;)&lt;/I&gt;

Touche&#039;??  

Did you happen to see this??   

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/28/a-post-truth-presidency/#comment-89574</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You know me, Michale ;)</i></p>
<p>Touche'??  </p>
<p>Did you happen to see this??   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/28/a-post-truth-presidency/#comment-89574" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/28/a-post-truth-presidency/#comment-89574</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89589</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89589</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What does blocking the ATT/Time Warner deal have to do with manufacturing jobs?&lt;/I&gt; 

Trump is going to sit down with them and hammer out a BETTER deal for employees that might be adversely affected by the merger..

It&#039;s not just about making the shareholders richer, don&#039;tcha know.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What does blocking the ATT/Time Warner deal have to do with manufacturing jobs?</i> </p>
<p>Trump is going to sit down with them and hammer out a BETTER deal for employees that might be adversely affected by the merger..</p>
<p>It's not just about making the shareholders richer, don'tcha know.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89588</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89588</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;One off&quot; my left arse cheek!!! :D&lt;/i&gt;

What does blocking the ATT/Time Warner deal have to do with manufacturing jobs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"One off" my left arse cheek!!! :D</i></p>
<p>What does blocking the ATT/Time Warner deal have to do with manufacturing jobs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89587</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89587</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Next up, the AT&amp;T and Time Warner merger, which candidate Trump said he would block. BET founder Robert Johnson told CNBC yesterday that he met with Trump last week, and his sense is the President “is going to sit down and negotiate” that deal as well.&lt;/B&gt;
-http://fortune.com/2016/11/30/donald-trump-carrier-deal-jobs/

A President that actually DOES something...  

What a novel concept....  :D

&quot;One off&quot; my left arse cheek!!!   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Next up, the AT&amp;T and Time Warner merger, which candidate Trump said he would block. BET founder Robert Johnson told CNBC yesterday that he met with Trump last week, and his sense is the President “is going to sit down and negotiate” that deal as well.</b><br />
-http://fortune.com/2016/11/30/donald-trump-carrier-deal-jobs/</p>
<p>A President that actually DOES something...  </p>
<p>What a novel concept....  :D</p>
<p>"One off" my left arse cheek!!!   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89586</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89586</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;ii/ What happened to the Manufacturing jobs?

It is expected that the Left would let Trump been sworn into office BEFORE declaring all of Trump&#039;s policies to be a failure.. :D&lt;/i&gt;

You know me, Michale ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>ii/ What happened to the Manufacturing jobs?</p>
<p>It is expected that the Left would let Trump been sworn into office BEFORE declaring all of Trump's policies to be a failure.. :D</i></p>
<p>You know me, Michale ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89585</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89585</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;... and succeeding, if they&#039;re the party in power. If this had become a partisan issue, with Democrats in favor of legalization, not even medical use would be legalized in any state.&lt;/i&gt;

Very good point - weaponizing MJ is a sure fire way of stopping progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>... and succeeding, if they're the party in power. If this had become a partisan issue, with Democrats in favor of legalization, not even medical use would be legalized in any state.</i></p>
<p>Very good point - weaponizing MJ is a sure fire way of stopping progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89584</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89584</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Says who???&lt;/i&gt;

Well, that would be me. We haven&#039;t seen the details - how much did it cost the Indiana taxpayer? Or the Federal taxpayer? What threats were used? What promises made?

Carrier didn&#039;t just decide to forego $68M/year because they like Trump&#039;s hairstyle. Even the most gullible fanboy knows there is a quid-pro-quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Says who???</i></p>
<p>Well, that would be me. We haven't seen the details - how much did it cost the Indiana taxpayer? Or the Federal taxpayer? What threats were used? What promises made?</p>
<p>Carrier didn't just decide to forego $68M/year because they like Trump's hairstyle. Even the most gullible fanboy knows there is a quid-pro-quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89583</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89583</guid>
		<description>And tobacco!

&lt;i&gt;You see what I mean by a slippery slope??&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And tobacco!</p>
<p><i>You see what I mean by a slippery slope??</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89582</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89582</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;ii/ What happened to the Manufacturing jobs?&lt;/I&gt;

It is expected that the Left would let Trump been sworn into office BEFORE declaring all of Trump&#039;s policies to be a failure..   :D

&lt;I&gt;Trump has made lots of promises about this and is grandstanding over Carrier, but Carrier is a one off&lt;/I&gt;

Says who???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>ii/ What happened to the Manufacturing jobs?</i></p>
<p>It is expected that the Left would let Trump been sworn into office BEFORE declaring all of Trump's policies to be a failure..   :D</p>
<p><i>Trump has made lots of promises about this and is grandstanding over Carrier, but Carrier is a one off</i></p>
<p>Says who???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89581</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89581</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Where is the victim if citizens can responsibly cook their own methamphetamine and use it in their own home??&lt;/i&gt;

Alcohol is much more dangerous than weed. We should ban it too.

&lt;i&gt;You see what I mean by a slippery slope??&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Where is the victim if citizens can responsibly cook their own methamphetamine and use it in their own home??</i></p>
<p>Alcohol is much more dangerous than weed. We should ban it too.</p>
<p><i>You see what I mean by a slippery slope??</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89580</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89580</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What this means is that &lt;/i&gt;either&lt;i&gt; party could champion it now, leaving the other party desperately trying to turn the clock backwards.&lt;/i&gt;

... and succeeding, if they&#039;re the party in power.  If this had become a partisan issue, with Democrats in favor of legalization, not even medical use would be legalized in any state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What this means is that </i>either<i> party could champion it now, leaving the other party desperately trying to turn the clock backwards.</i></p>
<p>... and succeeding, if they're the party in power.  If this had become a partisan issue, with Democrats in favor of legalization, not even medical use would be legalized in any state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89579</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89579</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The article was not about all illegal drugs, it was about weed.&lt;/I&gt;

According to federal law, marijuana is still an illegal drug...

&lt;I&gt;Where is the victim if citizens can responsibly grow their own weed and/or buy it from a regulated legal source and use it in their own home ?&lt;/I&gt;

Where is the victim if citizens can responsibly cook their own methamphetamine and use it in their own home??

You see what I mean by a slippery slope??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The article was not about all illegal drugs, it was about weed.</i></p>
<p>According to federal law, marijuana is still an illegal drug...</p>
<p><i>Where is the victim if citizens can responsibly grow their own weed and/or buy it from a regulated legal source and use it in their own home ?</i></p>
<p>Where is the victim if citizens can responsibly cook their own methamphetamine and use it in their own home??</p>
<p>You see what I mean by a slippery slope??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89578</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89578</guid>
		<description>The Democrats need a visceral issue to attack the Republicans with.

There are a few that will become available now that the Republicans are responsible for everything:

i/ Medical costs - these keep rising, even though they leveled off a bit due to Obamacare. Drug price increases, the rising revulsion towards Big Pharma for getting millions hooked on heroin, etc. will also play into this. If the Democrats can tie the Republicans to a failing healthcare system then they have a strong isue to run on

ii/ What happened to the Manufacturing jobs? Trump has made lots of promises about this and is grandstanding over Carrier, but Carrier is a one off and the rust belt voters wanted somebody to change DC - fortunately for the Democrats Trump isn&#039;t draining the swamp, he is wallowing in it like a human Jabba the Hut.

The danger with this is that those jobs are gone and aren&#039;t coming back, so the Democrats will only set themselves up for the same failure as Trump.

iii/ Wage growth - without steps to significantly grow the incomes of the 90% - which Trump doesn&#039;t seem to have on his agenda at the moment - a concerted campaign to tie Trump and the Republicans to a &quot;the Rich won again&quot; message should be viable and popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats need a visceral issue to attack the Republicans with.</p>
<p>There are a few that will become available now that the Republicans are responsible for everything:</p>
<p>i/ Medical costs - these keep rising, even though they leveled off a bit due to Obamacare. Drug price increases, the rising revulsion towards Big Pharma for getting millions hooked on heroin, etc. will also play into this. If the Democrats can tie the Republicans to a failing healthcare system then they have a strong isue to run on</p>
<p>ii/ What happened to the Manufacturing jobs? Trump has made lots of promises about this and is grandstanding over Carrier, but Carrier is a one off and the rust belt voters wanted somebody to change DC - fortunately for the Democrats Trump isn't draining the swamp, he is wallowing in it like a human Jabba the Hut.</p>
<p>The danger with this is that those jobs are gone and aren't coming back, so the Democrats will only set themselves up for the same failure as Trump.</p>
<p>iii/ Wage growth - without steps to significantly grow the incomes of the 90% - which Trump doesn't seem to have on his agenda at the moment - a concerted campaign to tie Trump and the Republicans to a "the Rich won again" message should be viable and popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89577</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89577</guid>
		<description>The concerns I have with making Marijuana the &quot;big issue&quot; for the Democrats are:

i/ Support is a mile wide but an inch deep - e.g. most parents don&#039;t want their kids to use MJ while at the same time that don&#039;t want them busted for it either

ii/ We are going thru a prescription drug induced horror show with heroin at the moment, and, while it isn&#039;t fair, MJ will be lumped into the heating up war on drugs

iii/ This isn&#039;t a pocketbook issue - &quot;Its the Economy Stupid&quot; doesn&#039;t apply to MJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concerns I have with making Marijuana the "big issue" for the Democrats are:</p>
<p>i/ Support is a mile wide but an inch deep - e.g. most parents don't want their kids to use MJ while at the same time that don't want them busted for it either</p>
<p>ii/ We are going thru a prescription drug induced horror show with heroin at the moment, and, while it isn't fair, MJ will be lumped into the heating up war on drugs</p>
<p>iii/ This isn't a pocketbook issue - "Its the Economy Stupid" doesn't apply to MJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89575</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89575</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Think of it this way. Should the government have a right to tell a citizen what they can do in their own home that does no harm to anyone else ?&lt;/I&gt;

You mean, like drink a large heavily-laden sugar drink??   :D

All things being equal, I would say &#039;no&#039;...

But I am against Nanny-State policies...

On the other hand, when it comes to illegal drugs, it rarely is a victim-less crime...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Think of it this way. Should the government have a right to tell a citizen what they can do in their own home that does no harm to anyone else ?</i></p>
<p>You mean, like drink a large heavily-laden sugar drink??   :D</p>
<p>All things being equal, I would say 'no'...</p>
<p>But I am against Nanny-State policies...</p>
<p>On the other hand, when it comes to illegal drugs, it rarely is a victim-less crime...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89573</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89573</guid>
		<description>This country is stupid in the aggregate and reefer madness is about as stupid as it gets. I see no reason to believe that we&#039;ll go anywhere but backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This country is stupid in the aggregate and reefer madness is about as stupid as it gets. I see no reason to believe that we'll go anywhere but backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comment-89569</link>
		<dc:creator>michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202#comment-89569</guid>
		<description>My only beef with the legalization issue is the claim that marijuana should be legalized because criminalizing it is too hard..

That&#039;s a very slippery slope that can lead to a horrible horrible place...

I have definitely changed my mind about medical marijuana but that was mostly due to personal family concerns...

But legalizing recreational use??

I am not quite there yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only beef with the legalization issue is the claim that marijuana should be legalized because criminalizing it is too hard..</p>
<p>That's a very slippery slope that can lead to a horrible horrible place...</p>
<p>I have definitely changed my mind about medical marijuana but that was mostly due to personal family concerns...</p>
<p>But legalizing recreational use??</p>
<p>I am not quite there yet....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
