Trump Tower in New York City
Trump Towers Istanbul, Turkey – first Trump building in Europe
Trump Tower (New York City)
Trump Towers (Sunny Isles Beach), Sunny Isles Beach, Florida
Trump Tower (White Plains), White Plains, New York
Trump Towers Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina
Trump International Hotel and Tower[edit]
Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)
Trump International Hotel and Tower (Honolulu)
Trump International Hotel and Tower (New York City)
Trump International Hotel and Tower (Toronto)
Trump International Hotel and Tower (Vancouver)
Trump International Hotel (Washington, D.C.), also known as Old Post Office Pavilion

You were saying???

"How long has Trump been in business?? 30 years?? 40 years???

You don't STAY in business that long if you are NOT successful..."

You DO , if you have a rich father who keeps bailing you out at a crucial moment.

"The Trump brand is a successful brand..."

REALLY??? Then why does EVERYTHING branded with his name, no loner exist??? The vodka, the steaks, the airline, the board game, even his Macy's clothing line and on and on etc. ALL GONE.

Richard Branson - Virgin Galactic, Virgin Airlines.

Warren Buffett - Burlington Northern R.R., Fruit of the Loom, GEICO

Mark Cuban - The Dallas Mavericks and Landmark Theatres.

Donald Trump - ZERO

And that's mostly off of the top of my head, without even trying hard.

There is simply no getting around this...

Many of the "dreamers" ARE criminals...

And we can ask the parents of Kathleen Steinle if Obama is deporting criminals...

I have a feeling they might disagree...

I can't name any business success of Richard Branson. But there is no doubt he is a success...

I can't name any business success of Warren Buffett, but there is no doubt he is a successful business man..

I can't name any business success of Mark Cuban, but there is no doubt.....

You see where I am going with this??

It's a success...

President-elect is NOT a business success. I notice you STILL can't name ONE.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence..

The mere fact that Trump is President is due to his success as a businessman...

So STOP calling him a successful business man when he is so patently obviously NOT,

How long has Trump been in business?? 30 years?? 40 years???

You don't STAY in business that long if you are NOT successful...

It's that simple...

By every OBJECTIVE measurement, Trump is a successful businessman.. The Trump brand is a successful brand...

No Hillary supporter can name a success that Hillary has accomplished... Does that mean she is NOT a success???

.......

OK bad example.....

. apparently moving to new york turned me into a bad teacher.

I find that very hard... nay.. IMPOSSIBLE to believe....

Good luck...

thanks for the kind thoughts. I'm dealing with some professional turmoil right now. apparently moving to new york turned me into a bad teacher. live and learn i guess.

JL

"ALL of Trump's have been failures so far to date.

Uh....

PRESIDENT-ELECT Trump.... :D"

President-elect is NOT a business success. I notice you STILL can't name ONE. So STOP calling him a successful business man when he is so patently obviously NOT, When not even YOU can name one successful business of his!

"I have no problem with prioritizing deportations... I just think that the FIRST consideration should be the safety of the American people..."

OH REALLY??? Isn't that EXACTLY what Obama has been doing the past few years! He was deporting criminals, and allowing children like Dreamers to stay....

"Because Americans are tired of it.

If Donald Trump reverts to Obama form, then you will hear from me and the rest who voted for Trump loud and clear..."

So why aren't I hearing from you yet???? Since Donald Trump is already filling positions in his administration with LOBBYISTS, the VERY people he said he was running AGAINST!

Yes there are.. Western Union, PayPal, etc etc..

But those COST fees.... And once there is a wholesale move by illegal immigrants to these other methods, those fees will rise..

Do you think that Mexico might stop an equal amount of money flowing from Mexico to the U.S. if we started putting our hands in the till?

What money flows from Mexico to the US??

Mexico can't threaten a flow that doesn't exist??

I am not sure which dimension you are referring to..

In THIS reality, US Aid to Mexico is almost 210 BILLION dollars...

The aid was broken down in the following manner:
Economic
Child Survival and Health: $-12,200
Department of Defense Security Assistance: $39,854
Development Assistance: $17,948,047
Economic Support Fund/Security Support Assistance: $40,810,450
Global Health and Child Survival: $3,894,197
Narcotics Control: $27,565,779
Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related: $7,074,531
Other Active Grant Programs: $15,381,152
Other State Assistance: $2,700,596
Other USAID Assistance: $2,764
Other USDA Assistance: $372,914
Peace Corps: $2,000,836

Military
Military Assistance, Total: $91,654,000
http://us-foreign-aid.insidegov.com/q/112/1590/How-much-money-does-the-U-S-give-to-Mexico

Even if you double the price tag of the wall to $20 Billion, Mexico can have this paid off in less than a month...

But, as I said... I don't really care WHO pays for the wall.. It's poetic justice to make Mexico pay for it, but that is mere sauce for the goose...

The important point is that the wall, the barrier, the minefield IS built...

Glad ta see yer still around.. :D

I have been thinking lately of those Weigantians who are MIA..

Glad ta see ya back among us.. :D

Did you hear the new culprit in Hillary's loss???

Clinton camp blames white female ‘internalized misogyny’ for loss

I shit you not, THAT is who Camp Hillary is blaming..

What the frak is an "internalized misogynist white female" anyways!????

They should be deported as well..

But the priority, for deportations anyways, SHOULD be the criminal element. The gangs and the thugs... Deport them.. Take them down to the everglades and feed them to the gators... I don't care... Just get them out of here..

THEN we can maybe talk about compassion..

That's why Democrats lost the immigration debate.. Because they refused to differentiate between the thugs and gang bangers and murderers and those that weren't...

ALL illegal immigrants were pure as the driven snow and just families looking for a better life, according to the Democratic Party...

I have no problem with prioritizing deportations... I just think that the FIRST consideration should be the safety of the American people...

Yea, and we have seen much of that in the last 8 years.. Which is EXACTLY why Donald Trump won the election..

Because Americans are tired of it.

If Donald Trump reverts to Obama form, then you will hear from me and the rest who voted for Trump loud and clear...

But I don't think Trump will revert to Obama form.. You don't get to be such a successful businessman AND elected president of the United States by being wimp and a whipping post..

That remains to be seen...

But, between the US and Israel, I am sure that we will be able to come up with a good plan that will punish Iran as they deserve and all but eliminate their push for a nuclear arsenal...

I really appreciate that we can talk about this...

But what it all boils down to is one thing..

Mexico and Canada et al need the US a LOT more than the US needs Mexico and Canada....

Those countries will march to our tune because the alternative is too scary and horrifying to contemplate...

Now that I have addressed the general, let me address your specifics.

Give me time...

If the rest of the world chooses to defy the United States when it comes to world security??

No. In the case of the JCPOA, if the rest of the world chooses to defy the US because the Trump administration is clueless when it comes to security as related to the JCPOA.

There, I fixed it for ya.

JL

2. Dipping into the transfer window till won't work (trade collapses, Trump would fail bigly and the real leaders of the country would whip his ass up and down Wall St. and K Street a few times as a warning to others)

3. Foreign aid is only $50M/year

Any other ideas?

The next time somebody says "remittances" to you, quote from this article so they can learn:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/mobile-phones-are-revolutionizing-personal-finance-in-sub-saharan-africa/

Here I assume you are talking about AML restraints. The problem is that the law needs to be specific about how to identify the KYC rules. Also the systems and laws apply to larger, repeated, transactions. Sending a few hundred dollars on a monthly basis is way under the triggers (I used to sell AML software to Wall St and the City).

Also, do you know how long it would take, and how expensive it would be to divert $10B from legitimate transactions under $1,000?

An AML investigation takes weeks and costs many thousands of dollars. The U.S. banks would get together and give Trump the $10B themselves not to have to do this. Of course, word might get round pretty quickly that the money being sent wasn't arriving at its destination. What do you think would happen then?

Also, do you have any idea how disruptive arbitrarily interfering with international money transfers would be? Trade wold grind to a halt in an instant as nobody would do anything until Trump figured out he had broken both economies and that there was nothing he could do about it because the trade was between private firms.

The whole idea is the childish ranting of an ignorant man who needs to be told "No Donald" more often.

Well his life is going to get a lot worse - humiliation and compromise are the currency of leaders in a democracy. I'll bet that was another thing he didn't know - he probably thought it was about flying about in Air Force One and being important.

How much does would the Trump Wall cost? $10B - so 200 years of foreign aid.

Are you kidding??

Do you think we actually give Mexico BILLIONS of dollars in aid and receive SOMETHING in return?? :D

1. Remittances will dry up instantly and other methods to move money will be found. This is so obvious I can't be bothered to explain it further. (cough Paypal cough).

American company taxes money laundering investigations

Any other suggestions?

Yea... You accepting the reality that we give Mexico billions of dollars in aid for which we get absolutely NOTHING in return...

Put it another way.. Replace Mexico with Israel..

Do you think it would be difficult to get Israel to pay for a wall?? :D

What about the 50% of illegal people who fly over the border (including the "Barrier") and overstay their visas? Most of my Irish friends at one point were here on expired visas taking good bartending jobs from hard working Americans ;)

If you had been paying attention you'd already know that everybody wants to renegotiate NAFTA to include more goods and services - it is working like a charm for just about everybody - so improving on it will make life better for everybody.

If we didn't have NAFTA our deficit with South East Asia and China would simply be higher. NAFTA has allowed us to enrich our neighbor to help alleviate problems that would otherwise spill over into our country in the form of more, and more desperate, illegal immigrants. Building a strong manufacturing base in Mexico instead of Shenzhen is a national security priority.

The Chinese would have a National Holiday called Trump Day if he put Mexico on the standard WTO tariff program. Mexico know this as well as most educated people who have spend any time reading the economic history of North America over the last 20 years.

Explain to me again what the Mexican and Canadian leaders said? Give Trump what he wants even though he hasn't asked for anything yet? C'mon Michale you can't be this uninformed.

The claims I've seen amount to:

1. We will steal remittances
2. We will not pay for goods we receive

Both of these are against just about every law going. But just ignoring that:

1. Remittances will dry up instantly and other methods to move money will be found. This is so obvious I can't be bothered to explain it further. (cough Paypal cough).

2. What would your next step be if you sent goods to a customer who didn't pay? I know that this is SOP for Trump with small businesses, but who exactly are we paying in Mexico for the cross border goods? (Hint: often subsidiaries of American companies). And countries are not like small business people with little assets who can be bullied by expensive legal threats - Mexico would have a field day in the WTO and U.S. legal systems, and obviously win, probably with interest and damages.

Any other suggestions?

I get there eventually.. :D

Firstly, point me to the quotes from the Canadian and Mexican leaders where they say they will give Trump what he wants on NAFTA.

OTTAWA/MEXICO CITY/TIJUANA, MEXICO – Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday he is willing to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has said he wants to change or scrap.

Mexico is also willing to discuss NAFTA with Trump but may seek to circumvent the United States on a broader trans-Pacific deal if necessary, a top official said on Thursday.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/11/11/business/canada-mexico-willing-discuss-nafta-trump-sidestep-u-s-tpp/#.WCuQ0PkoSuU

While it may not amount to "giving Trump everything he wants" it ALSO shows that Mexico and Canada are not as instringent as you claim them to be..

Even if you suddenly decide that Trump isn't a straight talker (if he meant barrier, why didn't he say barrier?) you forgot the bit about Mexico paying for it?

Wall, barrier.. Tomayto Potayto...

I have already shown how easy it is to force Mexico to pay for the wall..

The US gives Mexico billions and billions of dollars every year in various forms...

It would be quite simple to arrange it so that the US gives Mexico billions and billions of dollars every year in various forms MINUS the cost of the wall/barrier/whatever...

Regardless of that, I personally don't care WHO pays for the wall... The IMPORTANT part is that the wall is put in place and our southern border is secure...

I like this... I hope we can continue it...

Big woop.... All you have is semantics..

Even if you suddenly decide that Trump isn't a straight talker (if he meant barrier, why didn't he say barrier?) you forgot the bit about Mexico paying for it?

Firstly, point me to the quotes from the Canadian and Mexican leaders where they say they will give Trump what he wants on NAFTA. Since he hasn't stated what he wants, this might be a bit difficult, but we all know how you always back up everything with verifiable facts, quotes, etc.

Both Canada and Mexico - as well as the U.S. have wanted to tweak NAFTA for years - it didn't include energy, free movement of labor (that should go down well with the Trumpkins), etc. So there are still ways to improve it. This is something Canada and Mexico are very interested in.

Neil has become me!!!!

Oh my gods, the irony is just so delicious to the taste!!! :D

This is one where Trump has contradicted himself frequently. From "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States" he went wobbly almost immediately.

Firstly most passports don't state a person's religion. When this was pointed out to Trump (I wonder who gets the job of telling Trump he is an idiot), he amended it to restricting people from "active terrorist countries". Of course he didn't say what that means. Is France considered an active terrorist country? Why not? (That one is easy - they look like Trump, even if they speak funny and are a bit too familiar with cheese).

So another "policy" that Trump announced with great fanfare that will go nowhere, or if it does will cause mayhem and backfire.

Har har.

The leaders of Mexico and Canada are already on record as saying they are willing to modify NAFTA to Trumps liking...

Is there no end to this man's stupidity?

You are really REALLY trying too hard, my friend...

But he won't. He lied to everybody again. Anybody with a brain knew that.

Firstly the government would be sued by just about every major business in the U.S. (I'm not even going to start on how Canada and Mexico are going to react).

Prices would shoot up as Mexico and Canada would revert to standard tariffs for everything. Prices for U.S. exports that relied on Mexico or Canada as part of their supply chain would shoot up as well.

Massive job losses on either side of the borders would cause massive unrest - all blamed on Trump.

So, obviously even he isn't stupid enough to keep his promise. He also claimed (he says many contradictory things) that he will renegotiate it. That should be interesting. Mexico knows that all they need to do is stand firm and not blink and Trump is going to have to apologize and back down. The chaos in the interim will force Trump into a corner.

Is there no end to this man's stupidity?

Apparently, a few Weigantians aren't dealing with the loss very well.....

I'll help where I can... :D

AND he is President-Elect of the United States..

You lost...

Deal with it...

Regardless, the examples given ARE appointed positions, not elected..

And if they choose to actively impede Federal Law, then they will be guilty of obstruction and WILL be subject to arrest...

You just can't seem to get it...

"Elections have consequences"
-Barack Obama

Ya'all lost...

Deal with it..

Trick question - there aren't any.

If he'd taken daddy's money in 1976 and put it in a passive index tracking portfolio he'd be half as wealthy as he lies he is, and probably 4-5 times as wealthy as he really is.

The man is a con artist.

There is a reason why the US is the only remaining Superpower.....

If the rest of the world chooses to defy the United States when it comes to world security??

Then they will have to accept the consequences...

It's like the local Police Chiefs and federal funds I mentioned to JM...

If the rest of the world chooses to deal with Iran in their own way...... Then the rest of the world can't come running to the US for protection when Iran shows their true colors...

Uh....

PRESIDENT-ELECT Trump.... :D

USUALLY, but NOT ALWAYS. Many police chiefs in Louisiana are elected, as is the police chief of Santa Clara, for example.

If they are elected, they are Sheriffs.. Not Police Chiefs..

And they are technically not violating Federal Law, they are simply saying that they will not be the agents enforcing Federal Law. That Federal agents will have to do that themselves, and not rely on local officials to do it for them.

That's fine.. Then they locals won't get FEDERAL funds that are paid so that locals WILL assist Federal officials when required..

In other words, they don't want to do the job then they don't get PAID for the job..

I realize that's anathema to the Democrat way of thinking, but there it is...

"Police Chiefs are not elected, they are appointed...

And it's not a simple case of disagreement, but rather a case of appointed officials violating Federal Law..."

USUALLY, but NOT ALWAYS. Many police chiefs in Louisiana are elected, as is the police chief of Santa Clara, for example. And they are technically not violating Federal Law, they are simply saying that they will not be the agents enforcing Federal Law. That Federal agents will have to do that themselves, and not rely on local officials to do it for them.

"EXCEPT, he is NOT a successful businessman, not by a long shot!

The facts clearly say differently...

Reference the Michael Jordan quote if you are still confused..."

You are quite CORRECT, the FACTS do state otherwise, because at least Michael Jordan WAS successful MOST of the time.

ALL of Trump's have been failures so far to date. OTHER than his reality show, please name one long term successful business of his... can you???

Word is Rudy Guiliana is going to be the new SecState....

I think that's a pretty good indication where the JCPOA is heading....

If there is a more moronic, ignorant and stoopid statement in the history of language, I have yet to hear it.... :^/

Fair enough.. I was just surprised it wasn't being mentioned more and musing as to why... :D

Do you have anything to say about that, Michale?

I do....

Remember when I said that Florida is Trump and Trump is Florida...

Same applies to Israel... :D

I wonder if he'd tell the former head of the KGB to do that ...

I have no doubt that, if there is a reason to do so, Trump will have absolutely NO PROBLEM doing it.....

Wasn't it Obama who said Putin and Russia are simply competitors and not enemies??? :D

I wonder if he'd tell the former head of the KGB to do that ...

Do you have anything to say about that, Michale?

Because, he deserves it.

:-)

Well, we'll see who he nominates to be Secretary of State and then we'll revisit the JCPOA.

Once president-elect Trump takes office, and even before, he will receive many calls from the leaders of the P5+1 urging him to support the JCPOA.

And I am sure that President Trump will have absolutely NO PROBLEM telling those leaders to go pound sand.. :D

Says the guy who has been WRONG about everything to date.. :D

Police Chiefs are not elected, they are appointed...

And it's not a simple case of disagreement, but rather a case of appointed officials violating Federal Law...

Do you watch DESIGNATED SURVIVOR?? :D

Simple plans from simple minds. Just like Trump's plans for repealing "disastrous" Obamacare and the Wall Mexico are going to pay for.

Trump has surrounded himself with sycophants but now he has a real job in the real world anybody who isn't wearing extremely orange-tinted glasses can see he is full of it.

Mexico are not going to pay for the Wall.

A trade war with China and/or Mexico would trigger a long overdue recession and Trump would be squarely to blame.

Sadly, Trump lied to the poor people whose communities have been devastated by Republican fiscal policies since Reagan's time - something that the Democrats did not do enough to reverse.

The facts clearly say differently...

Reference the Michael Jordan quote if you are still confused...

But, but, but everybody in Washington is a loser and only Trump can negotiate good deals.

Har har.

The Iran deal is fine. The Republican Senate passed it. Trump is just mouthing off as usual - he would only make it worse, or be forced to activate the bombers if he touched it. Russia and China are not going to agree to a new round of sanctions - they could barely be kept on board while the deal we have was done.

"Once President Trump is sworn in, he invites said Police Chiefs to DC for a sit down..

Once their plane lands, have Federal Marshals arrest them...

I have not problem with that scenario... :D"

So you are arguing for the end of Federalism then??? Am I hearing you correctly? Arrest, in many cases, locally elected officials that the Federal government disagrees with???

Once president-elect Trump takes office, and even before, he will receive many calls from the leaders of the P5+1 urging him to support the JCPOA.

In fact, I would be very surprised if Putin hasn't already set him straight on that file ...

"a few of you" is what I call a step in the right direction! :)

"He can be taught!!!!"
-Robin Williams, ALADDIN

:D

"Hmmmm Let's see.. On the one hand, we have a guy who is a successful businessman, richer than god..."

EXCEPT, he is NOT a successful businessman, not by a long shot! He is a successful self promoter and at getting a great deal of media attention, but that it NOT the same thing. Also, his true net worth is HIGHLY questionable, since he owes over 300 million dollars to Deutsche Bank alone, and won't release his tax returns.

Is this because it has readily apparent to all that it IS an abysmal deal and universally accepted that it SHOULD be thrown on the trash-heap??

"a few of you" is what I call a step in the right direction! :)

http://www.wsj.com/articles/leading-contender-for-donald-trump-s-chief-of-staff-is-rnc-chairman-reince-priebus-1479069597

Damn. I guess I need to replace my "Kayne West 2020" yard signs now.

That's fine... I propose the KEIFER solution..

Once President Trump is sworn in, he invites said Police Chiefs to DC for a sit down..

Once their plane lands, have Federal Marshals arrest them...

I have not problem with that scenario... :D

You are right, and in fact many Bernie and Trump supporters were expressing this anger, however you can see how quickly the swamp has covered Trump. Bernie might have been a bit more successful, but it still would have been one group in one part of the system fighting against the House, the Senate and SCOTUS.

It might take a Watergate like scandal just at the right time (i.e. within a year of an election) to get the public to start asking real questions of their politicians.

Even then it would be difficult. We had a state level race locally that was more expensive than most Presidential races a couple of decades ago (adjusting for inflation). The sunk costs of any candidate are too high for the bag men not to get their payoff.

Half of the American people can't even be bothered to vote, and most of those that do believe everything on Facebook, Twitter, HuffPo and Brietbart.

Trying to build a grassroots campaign finance reform movement is an uphill task. We don't have any champions in power any longer - the last one was the ex-John McCain, and sadly the new-model John McCain went native as soon as his chance of being voted out came along, so we know where his priorities are now.

I just didn't realize it would be THIS bad.. :D

Says the person who voted for the worst run campaign ever.. :D

COLBERT: "Have you thought about looking inside the horse to see if there is anything in it before you open the gates and bring it into America?"

TRUMP: "No."

http://www.cbs.com/shows/the-late-show-with-stephen-colbert/video/BJ4msRxzN1eLUdY4pKPaRxEJZh0nsyOI/putin-sent-president-elect-trump-a-large-wooden-horse/

Worst President-elect ever.

Rudi Guiliani & Ben Carson - first rats off the sinking ship.

"I never thought the leopards would eat MY face!"

-sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party

Being obstructionist SOLELY for the sake of obstructing...

Exactly as I predicted...

Semantics.. Some places a wall simply cannot be put it... Yes, Trump should have said "BARRIER" instead of "WALL"...

Big woop.... All you have is semantics..

Since he already admitted he lied about #1 and #3 and we are only 8 days in, I'm rooting for the outcome of #2, but not the methods. I expect Trump will turn out to be just another lying politician though, and BS more.

Like I said.. 2008-redux with Neil playing the role of the entire GOP... :D

1. The Big Beautiful Wall along the whole border and paid for by Mexico

2. 45% Tarriffs on China and 35% on Mexico to bring back heavy industry to Pennsylvania, etc.

3. Fully repeal "disasterous" Obamacare on day 1.

Since he already admitted he lied about #1 and #3 and we are only 8 days in, I'm rooting for the outcome of #2, but not the methods. I expect Trump will turn out to be just another lying politician though, and BS more.

Here is a shortcut:

MPs urge chancellor to honour leave campaign's £350m NHS promise

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/24/mps-letter-urges-chancellor-honour-vote-leave-campaign-350m-pound-nhs-promise

Yea, that's always been yer claim...

As yet, COMPLETELY unsupported by any facts whatsoever...

It's funny... For a few Weigantians, they always accuse me of what they themselves actually do...

In this case, spout a bunch of BS with absolutely NO SUPPORTING FACTS whatsoever...

Of course, this is ONLY a few Weigantians....

Now that would be somebody I could vote for! ????

If one takes into account ALL the facts and not just the cherry picked facts that suit yer agenda.... not your strong point, I know..... Trump has got the biggest mandate ANY President-Elect has since since Reagan in '84...

It would be a tie between Robin Williams and George Carlin.

A

About 1/4 of the eligible voters. Less than Hillary got. Mandate my ass.

The legendary Gil Scott Heron was right

https://youtu.be/UlVgtckqSaY

Who would have thunked that the Populist movement would have been championed, however reluctantly, by the Republican Party!!??

Not even *I* could have come up with that kind of crazy!!! :D

"You know what humanity’s greatest creation has been? Music. That and nacho cheese. Even I couldn’t have dreamt up that deliciousness."
-God, AKA Chuck, SUPERNATURAL

:D

"Thank god we have the Electoral College to put a collar on crazy"
-ListenWhenYouHear

:D

So, anyone who voted for Trump is a skinheadnaziracistnationalist..??

Apparently, you didn't learn ANYTHING from this election.. :^/

https://www.facebook.com/viralthread/videos/598130190359668/

ONE WEEK AFTER ELECTION:
"President Trump will find it impossible to discard or rescind my programs. There is just too much support for these programs.."
-Barack Obama

Miss President Obama??

Hardly.... :^/

Not quite overflowing: a little less than half of the voting electorate, actually. Folks are saying that Trump's margin was the skinheadnaziracistnationalist vote, but now that one of them will be just steps from the oval office, I suppose that's all academic.

Damn frakin' skippy!!!

We threw the last bums out.. We have NO PROBLEM doing the exact same thing to ya'all...

Just remember... Ya'all serve at the pleasure of the American people...

An over-flowing basket of deplorables called THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

Maybe you've heard of them...

No one can say they weren't warned...

Si monumentum, requiris circumspece

Obama's rule by fiat will be his undoing...

When one lives by the Executive Order one will see their agenda die by the Executive Order...

No one can say they weren't warned...

Well, at least ONE of us thinks so.. :D