<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Poll Watch -- September, 2016</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86197</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 06:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86197</guid>
		<description>Just as I thought: a few sentences of apology, would have sounded sincere if he wasn&#039;t obviously reading it, then a statement of justification: the video is a decade old. Then a denial that he was even on the video, i.e., the &#039;that isn&#039;t me, anyone will tell you&#039; defense. Then a pivot to an attack on Clinton, which he promises we&#039;ll hear more about.  My question is: if the Trump video is, according to Trump, moot because it&#039;s an old video, what does that make the Lewinsky Scandal, which is even older?

If I&#039;m Hillary, I say Sunday night, &quot;Those things played out in public a long time ago, Donald,  and we spent a very difficult time afterward rebuilding trust in our marriage because we love each other. That is clearly not a concept that you&#039;ve ever been familiar with.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as I thought: a few sentences of apology, would have sounded sincere if he wasn't obviously reading it, then a statement of justification: the video is a decade old. Then a denial that he was even on the video, i.e., the 'that isn't me, anyone will tell you' defense. Then a pivot to an attack on Clinton, which he promises we'll hear more about.  My question is: if the Trump video is, according to Trump, moot because it's an old video, what does that make the Lewinsky Scandal, which is even older?</p>
<p>If I'm Hillary, I say Sunday night, "Those things played out in public a long time ago, Donald,  and we spent a very difficult time afterward rebuilding trust in our marriage because we love each other. That is clearly not a concept that you've ever been familiar with."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86182</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 04:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86182</guid>
		<description>Correction: the video was shot by NBC&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Access Hollywood.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: the video was shot by NBC's <i>Access Hollywood.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86179</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 03:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86179</guid>
		<description>Listen [16]: yep. True.

Hey I understand that Trump is about to release an &quot;Apology&quot; video in response to the video of him joking crudely with the cast of Inside Edition was released. It&#039;s been released unedited, so you can get the full effect of it. The media is on this like mosquitoes on tourists.

This remark is time stamped. I predict that Trump will do a cursory semi-apology tonight and then unload on Clinton tomorrow.  Remember when he went after her early in the primary for being an &#039;enabler&#039;? That he accused her of abetting Bill in his extra-presidential dalliances, yadda, yadda, yadda?  

Buckle up. Bill&#039;s about to defend his first wife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen [16]: yep. True.</p>
<p>Hey I understand that Trump is about to release an "Apology" video in response to the video of him joking crudely with the cast of Inside Edition was released. It's been released unedited, so you can get the full effect of it. The media is on this like mosquitoes on tourists.</p>
<p>This remark is time stamped. I predict that Trump will do a cursory semi-apology tonight and then unload on Clinton tomorrow.  Remember when he went after her early in the primary for being an 'enabler'? That he accused her of abetting Bill in his extra-presidential dalliances, yadda, yadda, yadda?  </p>
<p>Buckle up. Bill's about to defend his first wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86171</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 23:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86171</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Someday Republicans will quote him, you can bet on it.&lt;/I&gt;


Someday?!?!  Oh wait, I thought it said,

&quot;Someday Republican will &lt;b&gt; misquote &lt;/b&gt; him...&quot;

They will, but it won&#039;t be until they call themselves &quot;Democrats&quot; again.  Kinda like how they love to claim to be &quot;the Party of Lincoln&quot; today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Someday Republicans will quote him, you can bet on it.</i></p>
<p>Someday?!?!  Oh wait, I thought it said,</p>
<p>"Someday Republican will <b> misquote </b> him..."</p>
<p>They will, but it won't be until they call themselves "Democrats" again.  Kinda like how they love to claim to be "the Party of Lincoln" today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86170</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 23:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86170</guid>
		<description>Michale,

You are in our prayers!  Stay safe.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AGQbe9mWZU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>You are in our prayers!  Stay safe.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AGQbe9mWZU" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AGQbe9mWZU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86169</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86169</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re succeeding, Balthasar. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're succeeding, Balthasar. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86168</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86168</guid>
		<description>Balthasar,

&lt;i&gt;I will say, though, that I never saw a wax figure that looked as much like the person depicted as that sculpture I linked to in [8] does. &lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ll say... wow is that an accurate lump of gray. Now if they can get the oil painting on its face just the right shade of orange and get the teeny hands molded correctly. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar,</p>
<p><i>I will say, though, that I never saw a wax figure that looked as much like the person depicted as that sculpture I linked to in [8] does. </i></p>
<p>I'll say... wow is that an accurate lump of gray. Now if they can get the oil painting on its face just the right shade of orange and get the teeny hands molded correctly. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86167</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86167</guid>
		<description>Bloody brilliant Balthasar.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody brilliant Balthasar.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86166</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86166</guid>
		<description>I will say, though, that I never saw a wax figure that looked as much like the person depicted as that sculpture I linked to in [8] does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say, though, that I never saw a wax figure that looked as much like the person depicted as that sculpture I linked to in [8] does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86165</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86165</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are you trying to be funny, Balthasar?&lt;/i&gt;

Trying. With Michale away and hunkered down, there&#039;s no one to jump on the bad jokes, so that I won&#039;t put my foot in my mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you trying to be funny, Balthasar?</i></p>
<p>Trying. With Michale away and hunkered down, there's no one to jump on the bad jokes, so that I won't put my foot in my mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86163</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86163</guid>
		<description>Are you trying to be funny, Balthasar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you trying to be funny, Balthasar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86162</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86162</guid>
		<description>And then again...

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/01/16/36C75D0800000578-0--a-12_1470065572338.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then again...</p>
<p><a href="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/01/16/36C75D0800000578-0--a-12_1470065572338.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/01/16/36C75D0800000578-0--a-12_1470065572338.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86161</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 17:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86161</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Any chance we&#039;ll see him in Putin territory before next January?&lt;/i&gt;

I doubt that he&#039;ll be invited anytime soon. heh.

Seriously, I think Obama will leave office with quite good approval numbers, but that they will only improve with time (especially among Republicans). I picture Madam Tussaud&#039;s in the year 2030 having a display that includes the Clintons, the Obama&#039;s, and the two Bushes. The juxtaposition between the two dynastic families, the first black and (possibly) the first female president all interacting in the same  political time and place will, I&#039;m sure, be too much for historians to resist, and I expect lots of keystrokes to be spent analyzing the whole spectrum of the era 1992-2024, and its peculiar mix of cultural shift, partisan tribalism, shifting international terrain, and economic challenge. Trump&#039;s ascension to the nomination will be studied in relation to all of those, and the yet-unknown effect of his candidacy will have its own chapters in a whole shelf full of books, whether he wins or loses the election.  

So, as for Obama&#039;s approval ratings after he leaves office: I think we can safely assume that his numbers will rise (just as Carter&#039;s did, after all) and his role as the nation&#039;s first black president will certainly be celebrated, especially so in the black community. Someday Republicans will quote him, you can bet on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Any chance we'll see him in Putin territory before next January?</i></p>
<p>I doubt that he'll be invited anytime soon. heh.</p>
<p>Seriously, I think Obama will leave office with quite good approval numbers, but that they will only improve with time (especially among Republicans). I picture Madam Tussaud's in the year 2030 having a display that includes the Clintons, the Obama's, and the two Bushes. The juxtaposition between the two dynastic families, the first black and (possibly) the first female president all interacting in the same  political time and place will, I'm sure, be too much for historians to resist, and I expect lots of keystrokes to be spent analyzing the whole spectrum of the era 1992-2024, and its peculiar mix of cultural shift, partisan tribalism, shifting international terrain, and economic challenge. Trump's ascension to the nomination will be studied in relation to all of those, and the yet-unknown effect of his candidacy will have its own chapters in a whole shelf full of books, whether he wins or loses the election.  </p>
<p>So, as for Obama's approval ratings after he leaves office: I think we can safely assume that his numbers will rise (just as Carter's did, after all) and his role as the nation's first black president will certainly be celebrated, especially so in the black community. Someday Republicans will quote him, you can bet on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86159</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86159</guid>
		<description>Speaking from my own experience when Hermine came through my area of Florida, don&#039;t be too worried if we don&#039;t hear from Michale for about a week. Power outages can last a long time. It doesn&#039;t mean anything else is wrong. From one Florida hurricane survivor to another, stay safe and good luck Michale!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking from my own experience when Hermine came through my area of Florida, don't be too worried if we don't hear from Michale for about a week. Power outages can last a long time. It doesn't mean anything else is wrong. From one Florida hurricane survivor to another, stay safe and good luck Michale!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86157</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86157</guid>
		<description>Batten down the hatches, Michale. Stormtroopers just for you:

https://youtu.be/6WZkErIBBUs?t=4s

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Batten down the hatches, Michale. Stormtroopers just for you:</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/6WZkErIBBUs?t=4s" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/6WZkErIBBUs?t=4s</a></p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86155</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 01:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86155</guid>
		<description>I heard Obama is sitting at 55% right now. 

Any chance we&#039;ll see him in Putin territory before next January? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard Obama is sitting at 55% right now. </p>
<p>Any chance we'll see him in Putin territory before next January? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86154</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 01:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86154</guid>
		<description>I second, or third, all of those wishes, Michale, and the playlist, too! :)

Let us know you&#039;re alright as soon as you can!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second, or third, all of those wishes, Michale, and the playlist, too! :)</p>
<p>Let us know you're alright as soon as you can!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86153</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 01:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86153</guid>
		<description>Stay safe Michale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay safe Michale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/06/opw1609/#comment-86152</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12936#comment-86152</guid>
		<description>One other note to close on, for regular reader Michale -

Stay safe for the next few days.  I&#039;m sure I speak for everyone here when I say we truly want to see you blown away by Hillary Clinton&#039;s victory in a month, and not by mere hurricane winds!

:-)

Suggested playlist:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;All Along The Watchtower&quot;&lt;/em&gt; 
(Jimi Hendrix or Bob Dylan, take your choice....)
&quot;Two riders were approaching, and the wind began to howl.&quot;

&lt;em&gt;Riding The Storm Out&lt;/em&gt;
(REO Speedwagon)

&lt;em&gt;Riders On The Storm&lt;/em&gt;
(The Doors)

&lt;em&gt;Who&#039;ll Stop The Rain&lt;/em&gt;
(Creedence Clearwater Revival)

and finally,

&lt;em&gt;When The Levee Breaks&lt;/em&gt;
(Led Zeppelin)
&quot;If it keeps on rainin&#039;, the levee&#039;s gonna break...&quot;

Like I said, stay safe....

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other note to close on, for regular reader Michale -</p>
<p>Stay safe for the next few days.  I'm sure I speak for everyone here when I say we truly want to see you blown away by Hillary Clinton's victory in a month, and not by mere hurricane winds!</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>Suggested playlist:</p>
<p><em>"All Along The Watchtower"</em><br />
(Jimi Hendrix or Bob Dylan, take your choice....)<br />
"Two riders were approaching, and the wind began to howl."</p>
<p><em>Riding The Storm Out</em><br />
(REO Speedwagon)</p>
<p><em>Riders On The Storm</em><br />
(The Doors)</p>
<p><em>Who'll Stop The Rain</em><br />
(Creedence Clearwater Revival)</p>
<p>and finally,</p>
<p><em>When The Levee Breaks</em><br />
(Led Zeppelin)<br />
"If it keeps on rainin', the levee's gonna break..."</p>
<p>Like I said, stay safe....</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
