<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being Trump</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82467</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82467</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;So, to recap: this is no real controversy,&lt;/I&gt;

Other than the fact the administration lied and you admitted that it WAS ransom...

Other than that, you are correct.  No real controversy..  :D

&lt;I&gt;My guess is that the press is feeling guilty (as usual) about all of the negative press being generated about Trump (a negative-press generating machine), and are playing up this and other minor Clinton &#039;controversies&#039; in futile hope of &#039;balancing&#039; the ledger.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, cuz the press has ALWAYS been fair-minded like that..  :^/

Do you actually READ what you type???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So, to recap: this is no real controversy,</i></p>
<p>Other than the fact the administration lied and you admitted that it WAS ransom...</p>
<p>Other than that, you are correct.  No real controversy..  :D</p>
<p><i>My guess is that the press is feeling guilty (as usual) about all of the negative press being generated about Trump (a negative-press generating machine), and are playing up this and other minor Clinton 'controversies' in futile hope of 'balancing' the ledger.</i></p>
<p>Yea, cuz the press has ALWAYS been fair-minded like that..  :^/</p>
<p>Do you actually READ what you type???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82465</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82465</guid>
		<description>So let&#039;s go back to post [41](I&#039;m not as thrilled about using post numbers ever since the release of filtered posts changed all of the numbers the other day, so I&#039;ll add:) which begin, &quot;the right wants to have it both ways&quot;, which Michale promptly interpreted [51] as &quot;both are ransom&quot;.  In fact apophis [44] got it exactly right:  &lt;b&gt;&quot;Basically the hostages were the ransom that Iran had to pay to get its money released.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;

Now, Michale&#039;s posts have already signaled how this is being played: that the Obama administration &quot;lied&quot; when it said that the payment and release of the hostages weren&#039;t linked (the way the Reagan administration flat-out lied about trading missiles for hostages). But as apophis aptly points out, the situation is, if anything, reversed: the Iranians are clearly the party pressed to do the paying in this case, since it was their own money at issue.  No American money was used, hence, no American &quot;payment&quot; was made - so the issue is &#039;process&#039;, not &#039;veracity&#039;.

I understand why this is so difficult for many in the (willfully dense) press corps: it requires more than 140 characters to explain. Everyone who&#039;s commented on it here, save for the never-to-be-convinced-anyway contingent, seems to understand the nuanced difference just fine.

My guess is that the press is feeling guilty (as usual) about all of the negative press being generated about Trump (a negative-press generating machine), and are playing up this and other minor Clinton &#039;controversies&#039; in futile hope of &#039;balancing&#039; the ledger. On the other hand, the press have always been suckers for the Right&#039;s manufactured Clinton controversies - good for sales, I guess.


So, to recap: this is no real controversy, just another day in the political Mosh Pit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let's go back to post [41](I'm not as thrilled about using post numbers ever since the release of filtered posts changed all of the numbers the other day, so I'll add:) which begin, "the right wants to have it both ways", which Michale promptly interpreted [51] as "both are ransom".  In fact apophis [44] got it exactly right:  <b>"Basically the hostages were the ransom that Iran had to pay to get its money released."</b></p>
<p>Now, Michale's posts have already signaled how this is being played: that the Obama administration "lied" when it said that the payment and release of the hostages weren't linked (the way the Reagan administration flat-out lied about trading missiles for hostages). But as apophis aptly points out, the situation is, if anything, reversed: the Iranians are clearly the party pressed to do the paying in this case, since it was their own money at issue.  No American money was used, hence, no American "payment" was made - so the issue is 'process', not 'veracity'.</p>
<p>I understand why this is so difficult for many in the (willfully dense) press corps: it requires more than 140 characters to explain. Everyone who's commented on it here, save for the never-to-be-convinced-anyway contingent, seems to understand the nuanced difference just fine.</p>
<p>My guess is that the press is feeling guilty (as usual) about all of the negative press being generated about Trump (a negative-press generating machine), and are playing up this and other minor Clinton 'controversies' in futile hope of 'balancing' the ledger. On the other hand, the press have always been suckers for the Right's manufactured Clinton controversies - good for sales, I guess.</p>
<p>So, to recap: this is no real controversy, just another day in the political Mosh Pit...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82432</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82432</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;the administration said the events weren&#039;t connected and they were. so yes, they lied about that.&lt;/I&gt;

OK, THAT&#039;s all I wanted to hear..  :D

&lt;I&gt;as to whether or not the relationship between the events was a &quot;ransom&quot; - that is a matter of opinion and linguistics, because it doesn&#039;t fit neatly into that category.&lt;/I&gt;

Agreed...  Whether you want to call it ransom or leverage or any other label, the simple fact is one beget the other.

And the Administration said one  did NOT beget the other..

They lied..

We are in complete agreement...

If we can&#039;t find common ground on the obvious shit, what hope is there to find common ground on the complex stuff??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the administration said the events weren't connected and they were. so yes, they lied about that.</i></p>
<p>OK, THAT's all I wanted to hear..  :D</p>
<p><i>as to whether or not the relationship between the events was a "ransom" - that is a matter of opinion and linguistics, because it doesn't fit neatly into that category.</i></p>
<p>Agreed...  Whether you want to call it ransom or leverage or any other label, the simple fact is one beget the other.</p>
<p>And the Administration said one  did NOT beget the other..</p>
<p>They lied..</p>
<p>We are in complete agreement...</p>
<p>If we can't find common ground on the obvious shit, what hope is there to find common ground on the complex stuff??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82430</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82430</guid>
		<description>the administration said the events weren&#039;t connected and they were. so yes, they lied about that.

as to whether or not the relationship between the events was a &quot;ransom&quot; - that is a matter of opinion and linguistics, because it doesn&#039;t fit neatly into that category. ransom usually means paying your own money to get back something of value that was taken. the relationship between these events is more complicated, since there were at least four or five  events which we now know were interconnected, including the implementation of the nuclear treaty, ten captured sailors, four political hostages, a financial dispute and various other diplomatic issues. i&#039;m curious how the rest of the issues played out.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the administration said the events weren't connected and they were. so yes, they lied about that.</p>
<p>as to whether or not the relationship between the events was a "ransom" - that is a matter of opinion and linguistics, because it doesn't fit neatly into that category. ransom usually means paying your own money to get back something of value that was taken. the relationship between these events is more complicated, since there were at least four or five  events which we now know were interconnected, including the implementation of the nuclear treaty, ten captured sailors, four political hostages, a financial dispute and various other diplomatic issues. i'm curious how the rest of the issues played out.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82414</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82414</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The humiliation of a president

“We do not pay ransom. We didn’t here, and we won’t in the future.”

Barack Obama might like to have that one back this morning, to stick a pin in the moving finger that writes. But the finger done writ, and it won’t come back to cancel a single line of the president’s fatuous fib that the United States didn’t pay $400 million to ransom four hostages taken by the president’s friends in Tehran.

Perhaps the president can take some solace, thin as it is, in the fact that nobody believed him, anyway.

The lie fell apart Thursday when The Wall Street Journal reported that the money was withheld until the hostages were actually free, and provided details of how the swap took place. Rarely has a president been caught in such a big and brazen lie.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/18/iran-ransom-humiliates-obama/

Yep.....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The humiliation of a president</p>
<p>“We do not pay ransom. We didn’t here, and we won’t in the future.”</p>
<p>Barack Obama might like to have that one back this morning, to stick a pin in the moving finger that writes. But the finger done writ, and it won’t come back to cancel a single line of the president’s fatuous fib that the United States didn’t pay $400 million to ransom four hostages taken by the president’s friends in Tehran.</p>
<p>Perhaps the president can take some solace, thin as it is, in the fact that nobody believed him, anyway.</p>
<p>The lie fell apart Thursday when The Wall Street Journal reported that the money was withheld until the hostages were actually free, and provided details of how the swap took place. Rarely has a president been caught in such a big and brazen lie.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/18/iran-ransom-humiliates-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/18/iran-ransom-humiliates-obama/</a></p>
<p>Yep.....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82394</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82394</guid>
		<description>apophis,

&lt;I&gt;If Iran would have kept the 4 prisoners they would have never gotten their money back. It&#039;s called leveraging a deal, not ransom..&lt;/I&gt;

So....

In 1973, John Paul Getty III was kidnapped, the kidnappers could have just kept the kid and not get the money.... 

The money wasn&#039;t ransom, it was &quot;leverage&quot;...  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;You really are a simple simple creature..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Bartleby, DOGMA

Ya&#039;all can talk about what the definition of &#039;is&#039; is until the cows come home..

But the simple fact is this..

I said the payment was ransom..

Ya&#039;all said it wasn&#039;t..

The Odumbo administration just admitted that it was ransom..

Ya&#039;all were wrong..  AGAIN...

I was right... AGAIN...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;These are the facts of the case.  And they are undisputed.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apophis,</p>
<p><i>If Iran would have kept the 4 prisoners they would have never gotten their money back. It's called leveraging a deal, not ransom..</i></p>
<p>So....</p>
<p>In 1973, John Paul Getty III was kidnapped, the kidnappers could have just kept the kid and not get the money.... </p>
<p>The money wasn't ransom, it was "leverage"...  :D</p>
<p><b>"You really are a simple simple creature.."</b><br />
-Bartleby, DOGMA</p>
<p>Ya'all can talk about what the definition of 'is' is until the cows come home..</p>
<p>But the simple fact is this..</p>
<p>I said the payment was ransom..</p>
<p>Ya'all said it wasn't..</p>
<p>The Odumbo administration just admitted that it was ransom..</p>
<p>Ya'all were wrong..  AGAIN...</p>
<p>I was right... AGAIN...</p>
<p><b>"These are the facts of the case.  And they are undisputed."</b></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82388</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82388</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Nobody seems to notice that the Right is trying to have it both ways on the &#039;ransom&#039; issue:

Theory 1: the airplane holding hostages was held on the Tehran tarmac until proof of payment was made. Obviously ransom.

Theory 2: payment was withheld by US authorities until after hostages were released. Obviously ransom.

Am I the only one that sees this?&lt;/I&gt;

So, whichever story is factual, EITHER wat, it was, as YOU say, RANSOM....

Well, at least SOMEONE here, however briefly, is in touch with reality...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody seems to notice that the Right is trying to have it both ways on the 'ransom' issue:</p>
<p>Theory 1: the airplane holding hostages was held on the Tehran tarmac until proof of payment was made. Obviously ransom.</p>
<p>Theory 2: payment was withheld by US authorities until after hostages were released. Obviously ransom.</p>
<p>Am I the only one that sees this?</i></p>
<p>So, whichever story is factual, EITHER wat, it was, as YOU say, RANSOM....</p>
<p>Well, at least SOMEONE here, however briefly, is in touch with reality...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82382</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 08:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82382</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all simply are incapable of admitting you are wrong..

If someone holds someone hostage and gets money for their release, that money is ransom.. REGARDLESS of where that money came from..

Jeeesh, I am honestly taken aback...  Such a blatant denial of reality, totally based on ideological slavery...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all simply are incapable of admitting you are wrong..</p>
<p>If someone holds someone hostage and gets money for their release, that money is ransom.. REGARDLESS of where that money came from..</p>
<p>Jeeesh, I am honestly taken aback...  Such a blatant denial of reality, totally based on ideological slavery...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82381</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82381</guid>
		<description>The money was due for arbitration at the Hague. Iran was asking for ten billion. Real inflation adjustment comes out to about 6 billion.  The official settlement was 1.2 billion. The return of the original 400m from 1979 was largely symbolic. I guess the symbolism was important to the Iranian government, for them to be willing to release the prisoners as well as the ten seamen who had been captured days earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The money was due for arbitration at the Hague. Iran was asking for ten billion. Real inflation adjustment comes out to about 6 billion.  The official settlement was 1.2 billion. The return of the original 400m from 1979 was largely symbolic. I guess the symbolism was important to the Iranian government, for them to be willing to release the prisoners as well as the ten seamen who had been captured days earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82371</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82371</guid>
		<description>[47] What the... ? How did that...? Ignore that!

[22] apophis wrote:

&lt;i&gt;Are we witnessing the birth of the Trump Network? Staring The Donald, Presidential contender and winner of 12 Trump awards for excellence in broadcasting.

I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense. &lt;/i&gt;

Calling &quot;Lumpy&quot; a/k/a Sean Hannity... mark the &quot;FREE&quot; space... and I think we have a BINGO here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[47] What the... ? How did that...? Ignore that!</p>
<p>[22] apophis wrote:</p>
<p><i>Are we witnessing the birth of the Trump Network? Staring The Donald, Presidential contender and winner of 12 Trump awards for excellence in broadcasting.</p>
<p>I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense. </i></p>
<p>Calling "Lumpy" a/k/a Sean Hannity... mark the "FREE" space... and I think we have a BINGO here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82370</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82370</guid>
		<description>[22] apophis wrote:

&lt;i&gt;Are we witnessing the birth of the Trump Network? Staring The Donald, Presidential contender and winner of 12 Trump awards for excellence in broadcasting.

I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense. &lt;/i&gt;


I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense.

We&#039;ll just have to wait and see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[22] apophis wrote:</p>
<p><i>Are we witnessing the birth of the Trump Network? Staring The Donald, Presidential contender and winner of 12 Trump awards for excellence in broadcasting.</p>
<p>I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense. </i></p>
<p>I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense.</p>
<p>We'll just have to wait and see...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82366</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82366</guid>
		<description>[40] Balthasar: yep, I&#039;d seen the Parks Dept statement. Priceless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[40] Balthasar: yep, I'd seen the Parks Dept statement. Priceless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82365</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82365</guid>
		<description>apophis: that sounds about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apophis: that sounds about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apophis</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82364</link>
		<dc:creator>apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82364</guid>
		<description>Basically the hostages were the ransom

that Iran had to pay to get its money released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically the hostages were the ransom</p>
<p>that Iran had to pay to get its money released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82363</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82363</guid>
		<description>[1] [39] [40] 

&quot;OMFG&quot;! Thanks for the laughs. 

Where I come from, since the day he announced, I&#039;ve been seeing these Trump pinatas. They even are now selling different versions of the &quot;Trumpyata&quot; on the website that rhymes with &quot;spamazon.&quot; LOL

&quot;With his signature hairline and menacing eyes, this Donald Trump pinata is ready to burst! Pinata measures 32 inches high by 15 inches wide by 10 inches deep.&quot;
 
No balls, no guts, hollow and just full of air... Color: Orange. You supply candy and take turns whacking away at the little prick. Good times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[1] [39] [40] </p>
<p>"OMFG"! Thanks for the laughs. </p>
<p>Where I come from, since the day he announced, I've been seeing these Trump pinatas. They even are now selling different versions of the "Trumpyata" on the website that rhymes with "spamazon." LOL</p>
<p>"With his signature hairline and menacing eyes, this Donald Trump pinata is ready to burst! Pinata measures 32 inches high by 15 inches wide by 10 inches deep."</p>
<p>No balls, no guts, hollow and just full of air... Color: Orange. You supply candy and take turns whacking away at the little prick. Good times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82362</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82362</guid>
		<description>I never heard of ransom being paid with the kidnapper&#039;s money. It&#039;s a sweet deal if you can get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never heard of ransom being paid with the kidnapper's money. It's a sweet deal if you can get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82361</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82361</guid>
		<description>Nobody seems to notice that the Right is trying to have it both ways on the &#039;ransom&#039; issue:

Theory 1: the airplane holding hostages was held on the Tehran tarmac until proof of payment was made. Obviously ransom.

Theory 2: payment was withheld by US authorities until after hostages were released. Obviously ransom.

Am I the only one that sees this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody seems to notice that the Right is trying to have it both ways on the 'ransom' issue:</p>
<p>Theory 1: the airplane holding hostages was held on the Tehran tarmac until proof of payment was made. Obviously ransom.</p>
<p>Theory 2: payment was withheld by US authorities until after hostages were released. Obviously ransom.</p>
<p>Am I the only one that sees this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82360</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82360</guid>
		<description>Paula: not included in the C&amp;L story, but found in the Huffpo article on the same subject was the hilarious response by the NYC parks dept:

NYC parks department on naked Trump statue: &quot;NYC Parks stands firmly against any unpermitted erection in city parks, no matter how small.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula: not included in the C&amp;L story, but found in the Huffpo article on the same subject was the hilarious response by the NYC parks dept:</p>
<p>NYC parks department on naked Trump statue: "NYC Parks stands firmly against any unpermitted erection in city parks, no matter how small.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82359</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82359</guid>
		<description>Today&#039;s laugh: http://crooksandliars.com/2016/08/midday-open-thread-nude-donald-trump

Nude Donald Trump statue miraculously appears in NY City.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today's laugh: <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/2016/08/midday-open-thread-nude-donald-trump" rel="nofollow">http://crooksandliars.com/2016/08/midday-open-thread-nude-donald-trump</a></p>
<p>Nude Donald Trump statue miraculously appears in NY City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apophis</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82358</link>
		<dc:creator>apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82358</guid>
		<description>How is it ransom? 

If Iran would have kept the 4 prisoners they would have never gotten their money back. It&#039;s called leveraging a deal, not ransom..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it ransom? </p>
<p>If Iran would have kept the 4 prisoners they would have never gotten their money back. It's called leveraging a deal, not ransom..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82356</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82356</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Iran could have kept the 4 prisoners. Instead they chose the $400 million. Done deal..&lt;/I&gt;

Yea... In plain english, it&#039;s called &quot;RANSOM&quot;...

jeezus, are you so petty and ideologically enslaved that you can&#039;t admit basic reality if it goes against Odumbo???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Iran could have kept the 4 prisoners. Instead they chose the $400 million. Done deal..</i></p>
<p>Yea... In plain english, it's called "RANSOM"...</p>
<p>jeezus, are you so petty and ideologically enslaved that you can't admit basic reality if it goes against Odumbo???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apophis</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82355</link>
		<dc:creator>apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82355</guid>
		<description>“In basic English, you’re saying you wouldn’t give them $400 million in cash until the prisoners were released&quot;

Iran could have kept the 4 prisoners. Instead they chose the $400 million. Done deal..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In basic English, you’re saying you wouldn’t give them $400 million in cash until the prisoners were released"</p>
<p>Iran could have kept the 4 prisoners. Instead they chose the $400 million. Done deal..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82354</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82354</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;IRANSOM: OBAMA ADMIN ADMITS CASH FOR PRISONERS
The State Department admitted Thursday that the US would not hand over $400 million in cash to Iran until it released four American hostages — two weeks after President Obama insisted the payment was not a “ransom.”

State Department spokesman John Kirby was asked at Thursday’s press briefing: “In basic English, you’re saying you wouldn’t give them $400 million in cash until the prisoners were released, correct?”

“That’s correct,” Kirby replied.

In an Aug. 4 press conference, President Obama said the opposite&lt;/B&gt;
http://nypost.com/2016/08/18/state-department-400m-cash-to-iran-was-contingent-on-us-prisoners-release/

There it is, people..

Ya&#039;all were wrong....

It&#039;s that simple...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>IRANSOM: OBAMA ADMIN ADMITS CASH FOR PRISONERS<br />
The State Department admitted Thursday that the US would not hand over $400 million in cash to Iran until it released four American hostages — two weeks after President Obama insisted the payment was not a “ransom.”</p>
<p>State Department spokesman John Kirby was asked at Thursday’s press briefing: “In basic English, you’re saying you wouldn’t give them $400 million in cash until the prisoners were released, correct?”</p>
<p>“That’s correct,” Kirby replied.</p>
<p>In an Aug. 4 press conference, President Obama said the opposite</b><br />
<a href="http://nypost.com/2016/08/18/state-department-400m-cash-to-iran-was-contingent-on-us-prisoners-release/" rel="nofollow">http://nypost.com/2016/08/18/state-department-400m-cash-to-iran-was-contingent-on-us-prisoners-release/</a></p>
<p>There it is, people..</p>
<p>Ya'all were wrong....</p>
<p>It's that simple...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82353</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82353</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all *DO* realize that the world won&#039;t end if ya&#039;all admit yer wrong...

You DO realize that?? 

Right???

Jeeeeeesh

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all *DO* realize that the world won't end if ya'all admit yer wrong...</p>
<p>You DO realize that?? </p>
<p>Right???</p>
<p>Jeeeeeesh</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82352</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82352</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s only ransom if they demand money, which they didn&#039;t. &lt;/I&gt;

How do you know they didn&#039;t???

Considering it&#039;s IRAN, I would say it&#039;s a damn safe bet that they DID demand the money..

Look, you can debate what the definition of *IS* is until the cows come home..

The fact is...  I said it was ransom..

YA&#039;ALL said it wasn&#039;t...

The Odumbo Administration admitted today that it WAS ransom..

Ya&#039;all were wrong...  I was right..

DEAL with it...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It's only ransom if they demand money, which they didn't. </i></p>
<p>How do you know they didn't???</p>
<p>Considering it's IRAN, I would say it's a damn safe bet that they DID demand the money..</p>
<p>Look, you can debate what the definition of *IS* is until the cows come home..</p>
<p>The fact is...  I said it was ransom..</p>
<p>YA'ALL said it wasn't...</p>
<p>The Odumbo Administration admitted today that it WAS ransom..</p>
<p>Ya'all were wrong...  I was right..</p>
<p>DEAL with it...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apophis</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82351</link>
		<dc:creator>apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82351</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only ransom if they demand money, which they didn&#039;t. There&#039;s still about a billion dollars in interest to be payed at a later date, if they behave. If they don&#039;t play nice, then no money. Again, well played...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's only ransom if they demand money, which they didn't. There's still about a billion dollars in interest to be payed at a later date, if they behave. If they don't play nice, then no money. Again, well played...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82350</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82350</guid>
		<description>I would expect a concession from ya&#039;all admitting that ya&#039;all were wrong and I was right....

But, I know such a concession would be impossible, so.....  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would expect a concession from ya'all admitting that ya'all were wrong and I was right....</p>
<p>But, I know such a concession would be impossible, so.....  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82349</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82349</guid>
		<description>All in all, a very good day for me..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in all, a very good day for me..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82348</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82348</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; leverage their good behavior.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea..  It;s called paying ransom..

I don&#039;t have a problem with that per se..

I *DO* have a problem with ya&#039;all saying that we DIDN&#039;T pay ransom, when in fact, we did...

In other words, ya&#039;all were completely and unequivocally WRONG again and I was right..

That&#039;s the point...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> leverage their good behavior.</i></p>
<p>Yea..  It;s called paying ransom..</p>
<p>I don't have a problem with that per se..</p>
<p>I *DO* have a problem with ya'all saying that we DIDN'T pay ransom, when in fact, we did...</p>
<p>In other words, ya'all were completely and unequivocally WRONG again and I was right..</p>
<p>That's the point...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apophis</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82347</link>
		<dc:creator>apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82347</guid>
		<description>[25] 
Michale

So we used Iran&#039;s money to leverage their good behavior. Well played...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[25]<br />
Michale</p>
<p>So we used Iran's money to leverage their good behavior. Well played...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82346</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82346</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Oh Johnnie, Johnnie, did you back the wrong horse...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Dr Peter Venkmen, GHOSTBUSTERS II

:D

It&#039;s tough being so dead on ballz accurate so many times...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Oh Johnnie, Johnnie, did you back the wrong horse..."</b><br />
-Dr Peter Venkmen, GHOSTBUSTERS II</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>It's tough being so dead on ballz accurate so many times...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82345</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82345</guid>
		<description>Joshua,

Your thoughts??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua,</p>
<p>Your thoughts??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82344</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82344</guid>
		<description>Remember how ya&#039;all said that the $400 Million paid to Iran *WASN&#039;T* a ransom for hostages???

&lt;B&gt;STATE DEPT. SAYS $400 MILLION CASH PAYMENT TO IRAN WAS CONTINGENT ON AMERICAN PRISONERS&#039; RELEASE&lt;/B&gt;
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_APNEWSALERT?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2016-08-18-15-38-54

Looks like Odumbo just threw ya&#039;all under the bus...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how ya'all said that the $400 Million paid to Iran *WASN'T* a ransom for hostages???</p>
<p><b>STATE DEPT. SAYS $400 MILLION CASH PAYMENT TO IRAN WAS CONTINGENT ON AMERICAN PRISONERS' RELEASE</b><br />
<a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_APNEWSALERT?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2016-08-18-15-38-54" rel="nofollow">http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_APNEWSALERT?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2016-08-18-15-38-54</a></p>
<p>Looks like Odumbo just threw ya'all under the bus...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82343</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82343</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/18/1561500/-Trump-loving-white-supremacist-stabs-black-man-to-defend-police-from-Black-Lives-Matter

Trump Supporters.&lt;/I&gt;

Sorry, Paula.. You have absolutely NO CREDIBILITY to condemn Trump supporters, when you are COMPLETELY silent about all the violence and destruction  and assaults and shootings committed by Hillary&#039;s (O)BLM scumbags...

No moral foundation whatsoever..

But thank you for proving beyond any doubt what I have said last week...

Ya&#039;all only speak up when Right Wing scumbags commit violent acts..

When Left Wing scumbags commit violent acts, ya are perfectly OK with it...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/18/1561500/-Trump-loving-white-supremacist-stabs-black-man-to-defend-police-from-Black-Lives-Matter" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/18/1561500/-Trump-loving-white-supremacist-stabs-black-man-to-defend-police-from-Black-Lives-Matter</a></p>
<p>Trump Supporters.</i></p>
<p>Sorry, Paula.. You have absolutely NO CREDIBILITY to condemn Trump supporters, when you are COMPLETELY silent about all the violence and destruction  and assaults and shootings committed by Hillary's (O)BLM scumbags...</p>
<p>No moral foundation whatsoever..</p>
<p>But thank you for proving beyond any doubt what I have said last week...</p>
<p>Ya'all only speak up when Right Wing scumbags commit violent acts..</p>
<p>When Left Wing scumbags commit violent acts, ya are perfectly OK with it...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82342</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82342</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;We&#039;ll just have to wait and see...&lt;/I&gt;

Trump Is Toast Prediction #73

Apparently, Apophis is ignoring the polls in favor of his fantasies..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We'll just have to wait and see...</i></p>
<p>Trump Is Toast Prediction #73</p>
<p>Apparently, Apophis is ignoring the polls in favor of his fantasies..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apophis</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82340</link>
		<dc:creator>apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82340</guid>
		<description>Could it be that Trump has made his pivot? With the addition of Bannon, Ailes, and Conway I believe we will see more of Trump being Trump, only nastier.

Are we witnessing the birth of the Trump Network? Staring The Donald, Presidential contender and winner of 12 Trump awards for excellence in broadcasting.

I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense.

We&#039;ll just have to wait and see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that Trump has made his pivot? With the addition of Bannon, Ailes, and Conway I believe we will see more of Trump being Trump, only nastier.</p>
<p>Are we witnessing the birth of the Trump Network? Staring The Donald, Presidential contender and winner of 12 Trump awards for excellence in broadcasting.</p>
<p>I made the last part up, but Bannon of Brietbart fame, Ailes from Fox news, and Conway, it just makes sense.</p>
<p>We'll just have to wait and see...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82339</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82339</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/18/1561500/-Trump-loving-white-supremacist-stabs-black-man-to-defend-police-from-Black-Lives-Matter

Trump Supporters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/18/1561500/-Trump-loving-white-supremacist-stabs-black-man-to-defend-police-from-Black-Lives-Matter" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/18/1561500/-Trump-loving-white-supremacist-stabs-black-man-to-defend-police-from-Black-Lives-Matter</a></p>
<p>Trump Supporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82329</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82329</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;in that case i agree, they&#039;re quite stable.&lt;/I&gt;

Then, once again, WE have nothing further to discuss...

Maybe those who are er... SPAM&#039;ing the community with outrageous claims of Trumps toast&#039;edness will see your words...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>in that case i agree, they're quite stable.</i></p>
<p>Then, once again, WE have nothing further to discuss...</p>
<p>Maybe those who are er... SPAM'ing the community with outrageous claims of Trumps toast'edness will see your words...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82328</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82328</guid>
		<description>did anyone watch the green party own hall yesterday on CNN? i didn&#039;t necessarily agree with most positions they took, but i thought it was interesting political theater. perhaps our country could evolve from a two party system to four. given the amount of gerrymandering present in most states, it would be helpful to have a choice in each district between two parties that were more aligned with that district&#039;s voters, not just one party &quot;conservative&quot; and the other &quot;liberal.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did anyone watch the green party own hall yesterday on CNN? i didn't necessarily agree with most positions they took, but i thought it was interesting political theater. perhaps our country could evolve from a two party system to four. given the amount of gerrymandering present in most states, it would be helpful to have a choice in each district between two parties that were more aligned with that district's voters, not just one party "conservative" and the other "liberal."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82327</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82327</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;MY point wasn&#039;t that Trump is winning and Hillary is losing.. My point is that it totally decimates the argument that Trump&#039;s numbers are &quot;falling like a stone&quot;.... :D&lt;/i&gt;

in that case i agree, they&#039;re quite stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>MY point wasn't that Trump is winning and Hillary is losing.. My point is that it totally decimates the argument that Trump's numbers are "falling like a stone".... :D</i></p>
<p>in that case i agree, they're quite stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82324</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82324</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;if and when donald gets a lead in the RCP average, it will be cause for more serious concern.&lt;/I&gt;

I&#039;ll remind you of that when it happens..  :D


&lt;I&gt; clinton&#039;s lead shrinking from eight points to five or six as the convention bump fades, not as big a deal.&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s not the points, it&#039;s the momentum..

Regardless,  you miss the point..

MY point wasn&#039;t that Trump is winning and Hillary is losing..  My point is that it totally decimates the argument that Trump&#039;s numbers are &quot;falling like a stone&quot;....  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>if and when donald gets a lead in the RCP average, it will be cause for more serious concern.</i></p>
<p>I'll remind you of that when it happens..  :D</p>
<p><i> clinton's lead shrinking from eight points to five or six as the convention bump fades, not as big a deal.</i></p>
<p>It's not the points, it's the momentum..</p>
<p>Regardless,  you miss the point..</p>
<p>MY point wasn't that Trump is winning and Hillary is losing..  My point is that it totally decimates the argument that Trump's numbers are "falling like a stone"....  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82322</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82322</guid>
		<description>if and when donald gets a lead in the RCP average, it will be cause for more serious concern. clinton&#039;s lead shrinking from eight points to five or six as the convention bump fades, not as big a deal.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if and when donald gets a lead in the RCP average, it will be cause for more serious concern. clinton's lead shrinking from eight points to five or six as the convention bump fades, not as big a deal.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82299</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82299</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Whatever Trump is doing, he must be doing it right..

Hillary is STILL going down in the RCP POPs and Trump&#039;s numbers are heading back up...&lt;/I&gt;

{{{ccchhiiiirrrrrppppppp}}}  {{cchhhiiirrrrrppppp}}

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Whatever Trump is doing, he must be doing it right..</p>
<p>Hillary is STILL going down in the RCP POPs and Trump's numbers are heading back up...</i></p>
<p>{{{ccchhiiiirrrrrppppppp}}}  {{cchhhiiirrrrrppppp}}</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82296</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82296</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;my view is that august is far too early to be talking about toast, &lt;/I&gt;

Agreed....

But that doesn&#039;t stop the WPG from doing it just the same..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>my view is that august is far too early to be talking about toast, </i></p>
<p>Agreed....</p>
<p>But that doesn't stop the WPG from doing it just the same..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82295</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82295</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;but hillary is definitely ahead at the moment&lt;/I&gt;

but hillary is &lt;B&gt;barely&lt;/B&gt; ahead at the moment

There..  Fixed it for you...  :D

We have been here before..  And Trump always managed to come out on top...

EACH and EVERY time...  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but hillary is definitely ahead at the moment</i></p>
<p>but hillary is <b>barely</b> ahead at the moment</p>
<p>There..  Fixed it for you...  :D</p>
<p>We have been here before..  And Trump always managed to come out on top...</p>
<p>EACH and EVERY time...  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82291</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82291</guid>
		<description>CW - I updated my 4 data sets yesterday and ran my models.  The rank ordered probability model gives Trump his most favorable odds by assuming a full bore wave election.  All of the following apply to that model.

The 4 data sets give nearly identical odds of Trump winning the Electoral Race - 20 to 21%.

All four data sets support your contention that Virginia and Pennsylvania are keystones in a Clinton Victory.  However, Trump has rather poor odds of turning these states...5 to 13 percent across the 4 data sets.

The models suggest better weak points (weaker keystones) for Trump to focus on...states offering something close to 20% chance of working. 

The 538 data set suggests a strong push in New Hampshire.

The NY Times data set suggests New Mexico (prime target) and maybe Wisconsin as secondary.

The Princeton Electoral Consortium data set argues Wisconsin and North Carolina as primary targets, Michigan as secondary

The Predict Wise data says concentrate on Nevada.

The four data sets don&#039;t agree on the best strategy, but all say focusing on the right weak link more or less doubles Trump&#039;s odds of being elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW - I updated my 4 data sets yesterday and ran my models.  The rank ordered probability model gives Trump his most favorable odds by assuming a full bore wave election.  All of the following apply to that model.</p>
<p>The 4 data sets give nearly identical odds of Trump winning the Electoral Race - 20 to 21%.</p>
<p>All four data sets support your contention that Virginia and Pennsylvania are keystones in a Clinton Victory.  However, Trump has rather poor odds of turning these states...5 to 13 percent across the 4 data sets.</p>
<p>The models suggest better weak points (weaker keystones) for Trump to focus on...states offering something close to 20% chance of working. </p>
<p>The 538 data set suggests a strong push in New Hampshire.</p>
<p>The NY Times data set suggests New Mexico (prime target) and maybe Wisconsin as secondary.</p>
<p>The Princeton Electoral Consortium data set argues Wisconsin and North Carolina as primary targets, Michigan as secondary</p>
<p>The Predict Wise data says concentrate on Nevada.</p>
<p>The four data sets don't agree on the best strategy, but all say focusing on the right weak link more or less doubles Trump's odds of being elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82290</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82290</guid>
		<description>my view is that august is far too early to be talking about toast, but hillary is definitely ahead at the moment, and the trump camp is projecting a profound sense of denial.

&lt;b&gt;You say it’s not a shake-up, but you guys are down—

Says who? Says who?

Polls. Most of them. All of them?

- Says who?

Polls. I just told you. I answered your question.

- Okay. Which polls?

All of them.

- Okay. And your question is?&lt;/b&gt;

not just a river in egypt.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my view is that august is far too early to be talking about toast, but hillary is definitely ahead at the moment, and the trump camp is projecting a profound sense of denial.</p>
<p><b>You say it’s not a shake-up, but you guys are down—</p>
<p>Says who? Says who?</p>
<p>Polls. Most of them. All of them?</p>
<p>- Says who?</p>
<p>Polls. I just told you. I answered your question.</p>
<p>- Okay. Which polls?</p>
<p>All of them.</p>
<p>- Okay. And your question is?</b></p>
<p>not just a river in egypt.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82288</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82288</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;White House Watch
White House Watch: Clinton 41%, Trump 39%, Johnson 9%, Stein 3%&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch

Tell me again how Trump is toast??

I seem to have forgotten what with all the polls to the contrary...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>White House Watch<br />
White House Watch: Clinton 41%, Trump 39%, Johnson 9%, Stein 3%</b><br />
<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch</a></p>
<p>Tell me again how Trump is toast??</p>
<p>I seem to have forgotten what with all the polls to the contrary...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82273</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82273</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;A new NBC News/SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking poll showed the Democratic presidential nominee led Trump by nine points at 50 percent to 41 percent. But in spite of her 9-point lead, Clinton remains defined by negative perceptions about her character. A scant 12 percent of Democrats found Clinton honest and trustworthy in the survey.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/even-democrats-think-clinton-dishonest/

OUCH....

That&#039;s gotta hurt....

Of course ya&#039;all ignore these facts....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A new NBC News/SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking poll showed the Democratic presidential nominee led Trump by nine points at 50 percent to 41 percent. But in spite of her 9-point lead, Clinton remains defined by negative perceptions about her character. A scant 12 percent of Democrats found Clinton honest and trustworthy in the survey.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/even-democrats-think-clinton-dishonest/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/even-democrats-think-clinton-dishonest/</a></p>
<p>OUCH....</p>
<p>That's gotta hurt....</p>
<p>Of course ya'all ignore these facts....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82271</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82271</guid>
		<description>According to reports, Hillary is suffering from exhaustion and has no events planned til Sunday...

Like I said.  It&#039;s beginning to look like Hillary won&#039;t be physically able to cross the finish line..  :D

Yea, I know.. My Hillary predictions are almost as reliable as my SCOTUS predictions.  :D  But the facts are out there.. :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to reports, Hillary is suffering from exhaustion and has no events planned til Sunday...</p>
<p>Like I said.  It's beginning to look like Hillary won't be physically able to cross the finish line..  :D</p>
<p>Yea, I know.. My Hillary predictions are almost as reliable as my SCOTUS predictions.  :D  But the facts are out there.. :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82266</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82266</guid>
		<description>Whatever Trump is doing, he must be doing it right..

Hillary is STILL going down in the RCP POPs and Trump&#039;s numbers are heading back up...

I note a touch of panic amongst Weigantians..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever Trump is doing, he must be doing it right..</p>
<p>Hillary is STILL going down in the RCP POPs and Trump's numbers are heading back up...</p>
<p>I note a touch of panic amongst Weigantians..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82265</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82265</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Buried in all the other news about Trump&#039;s campaign shakeup was an interesting factoid. The Trump campaign is finally ready to engage in the battle for the airwaves. To date in the general campaign, Trump has spent zero (that&#039;s ZERO) dollars on advertising. Hillary Clinton has spent close to $60 million, for comparison.&lt;/I&gt;

Jeb spent more than twice that amount..

Did it do him any good??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Buried in all the other news about Trump's campaign shakeup was an interesting factoid. The Trump campaign is finally ready to engage in the battle for the airwaves. To date in the general campaign, Trump has spent zero (that's ZERO) dollars on advertising. Hillary Clinton has spent close to $60 million, for comparison.</i></p>
<p>Jeb spent more than twice that amount..</p>
<p>Did it do him any good??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82264</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82264</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note..

All of the sudden, Mexico&#039;s President says that he will meet with Trump..

Apparently he knows that Trump is going to be our next President...

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note..</p>
<p>All of the sudden, Mexico's President says that he will meet with Trump..</p>
<p>Apparently he knows that Trump is going to be our next President...</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82263</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82263</guid>
		<description>So, don&#039;t tell me, let me guess.

TRUMP IS TOAST, right??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, don't tell me, let me guess.</p>
<p>TRUMP IS TOAST, right??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apophis</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82259</link>
		<dc:creator>apophis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82259</guid>
		<description>With McMullin in the race the good people of Utah have the choice of two Republicans. McMullin could take votes from Trump and if he can pull about 9% Clinton could win the state with 25-30% of the vote...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With McMullin in the race the good people of Utah have the choice of two Republicans. McMullin could take votes from Trump and if he can pull about 9% Clinton could win the state with 25-30% of the vote...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82258</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82258</guid>
		<description>If Trump is going to be Trump, then we should all clearly name what that is. I&#039;ll start.

Trump is . . . almost single-handedly responsible for President Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Trump is going to be Trump, then we should all clearly name what that is. I'll start.</p>
<p>Trump is . . . almost single-handedly responsible for President Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82257</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82257</guid>
		<description>I read this last night and got a huge laugh out of it, but can&#039;t remember who wrote the article to give them the proper credit:

&lt;b&gt;
Trump is the first person to take the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the results were &quot;OMFG&quot;!  &lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this last night and got a huge laugh out of it, but can't remember who wrote the article to give them the proper credit:</p>
<p><b><br />
Trump is the first person to take the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the results were "OMFG"!  </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/17/being-trump/#comment-82256</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12692#comment-82256</guid>
		<description>In a weapons producing nation under Jesus
In the fabled crucible of the free world
Camera crews search for clues amid the detritus
And entertainment shapes the land the way the hammer shapes the hand
Gleaming faces in the checkout counter at the Church of Fame
The lucky winners cheer Casino Nation
All those not on TV only have themselves to blame
And don&#039;t quite seem to understand the way the hammer shapes the hand

Jackson Browne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a weapons producing nation under Jesus<br />
In the fabled crucible of the free world<br />
Camera crews search for clues amid the detritus<br />
And entertainment shapes the land the way the hammer shapes the hand<br />
Gleaming faces in the checkout counter at the Church of Fame<br />
The lucky winners cheer Casino Nation<br />
All those not on TV only have themselves to blame<br />
And don't quite seem to understand the way the hammer shapes the hand</p>
<p>Jackson Browne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
