Once again...

Spare me the faux righteous indignation regarding Trumps responses to the scumbag Kahn who put his own financial interests before the honor of his son....

Kahn is no different than Trayvon Martin's parents or Michael Brown's parents..

Making money off their dead children..

Pathetic... Pathetic and sad...

Michale

If Kahn had spoke at the RNC and lambasted Hillary for her vote on a war that got Captain Khan killed, ya'all would be saying the EXACT same things about Kahn that I am saying...

Ya'all would be bringing up his financial interests, his support of Sharia and all the other stuff that's floating around..

But because Kahn is saying exactly what ya'all want to hear, he is the cat's meow...

So, spare me the faux righteous indignation...

It's all about partisan ideology... Nothing more...

Michale

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2016-08-03.html

There is her take on this Kahn issue..

I am sure ya'all will soak it all up just as ya'all did when she said something you like to hear.. :D

Michale

Uh... yea.. OK... :^/

You failed to provide any link to verify the statement's authenticity.

So, you think I made it up?? :D

That's so typical of ya'all... You see something you don't like or doesn't fit thru your Partisan Ideological Filter, you simply deny it exists..

A simple google search shows how lame the accusation is..

https://www.google.com/#q=%E2%80%9CI+don%E2%80%99t+care+how+many+children+Pat+Smith+lost%2C+I+would+like+to+beat+her+to+death.%E2%80%9D+

It came from a GQ writer who has since "apologized" for the statement. But lets face reality.. As a Left Wingery moron, he was simply apologizing for the uproar, not apologizing for the statement itself..

But the point is, this is how the Left Wingery treats people like Patricia Smith.. And then worships and deifies morons like Kahn, Brown or Martin who want to make money off their children's deaths..

Michale

NEITHER HAVE YOU!!! You have pointed fingers at the rest of us for not condemning this statement that none of us made, that was not made by Hillary nor any one associated with her campaign, but YOU have never condemned it! Where is Trump's condemnation or the GOP's condemnation of this comment? Surely they addressed it, but I cannot find any links that show them speaking out against it! Oh wait, how is anyone supposed to condemn the statement that you created in an attempt to prove your point? You failed to provide any link to verify the statement's authenticity. So if you want me to condemn you for making up a vile statement in an attempt to prove a point that no one was arguing, then I will give in and respond as you wish....

I condemn you and your fictional quote!!!

Congrats!

And don't think I don't appreciate the irony of me complaining about ya'all going off on tangents. :D

Michale

If ya'all would just address the issues and not go off on a dozen different tangets, there would be a LOT less posts from me..

Michale

"These endless obfuscations and quibbles!!"
-Romulan Commander Thea

It's easy to prove me wrong..

Just agree to the point..

Michale

It's like listening to the pastor who is overly critical of gays, or that one friend you can always tell what they have been up to by what they accuse others of being guilty of...

The lady doth protest too much, me thinks. -Hamlet Act III, Scene II

Hillary has as much blood on her hands as the GOP has on theirs..

But you can't admit that because you are enslaved by Party loyalty and dogma...

Michale

And yet, not a SINGLE ONE of ya'all condemned that statement..

Funny how that is, eh??

Of course, NOW ya'all will fall all over yerselves to condemn the statement...

But the simple fact remains that ya'all support the attacks on the families of Hillary's Benghazi victims...

It's nothing but blatant hypocrisy...

Michale

Right out the gate, Kahn was furthering a lie because that is NOT what Trump said..

But the Democrat Party is the Party of Lies, so Kahn fit right in...

And is Clinton now responsible for every single death that has occurred since Bill was President

Why not? Bush is responsible for every single death under HIS presidency...

Comrade Trump is spiraling outta control,

And the 36th??? 37th??? TRUMP IS TOAST prediction.. :D

Ya'all have been wrong *EVERY SINGLE TIME* to date...

What makes you think you will be right this time??? Wishful thinking??

Michale

Why didn't Trump have him speak at the RNC? And is Clinton now responsible for every single death that has occurred since Bill was President? She caused all of those people to die, but Republicans don't have the blood on their hands? Convenient! Comrade Trump is spiraling outta control, but you keep on believing it's all part of his "master plan"!

In ya'all's blind partisan hysteria to attack Trump, you forget that one salient point..

Michale

You mean the narrative that muslims coming from terrorist oriented countries should be checked much more closely??

How is that "dangerous" and "ignorant"???

I would guess that about 40% of the American people are unaware of Muslim American's who have served and died for their country. Call it a civics lesson.

If we were talking about muslim Americans you would have a point. But we're not, so you don't..

Hardly relevant but, this is wholly distasteful and disgraceful comment as the pain of losing a loved one who has faithfully served their country knows know boundaries or end.

“I don’t care how many children Pat Smith lost, I would like to beat her to death.”
-Hillary Supporter Bethlehem Shoals

Yet, you are silent on this.

So, forgive me if I don't treat your condemnation as serious...

Let them or others make it.

They have. And the Left Wingery (plus many here) attacked them and demonized them for it..

Another distasteful and disgraceful comment that has nothing to do with Trumps ignorant and dangerous comments about Muslims and the Kahn family response to them.

But it IS a factual comment. And it's no more distasteful or disgraceful than many of the comments made here about Patricia Smith and Charles Woods..

And, this is what separates you from the rest of us ... we acknowledge and sympathize and empathize with the Smith family

Bullshit.. Show me where...

You can't because it never happened..

Smith and Woods have been demonized and attacked by the Left Wingery ad nasuem..

Hillary out and out called them liars when the facts CLEARLY prove that it is Hillary who is lying..

But facts don't mean anything here..

Or, more accurately, facts take a backseat to Partisan Ideology..

Michale

And, because you have a problem with apostrophes, Michale, that paragraph should read as follows:

To counter Donald Trump's very dangerous and ignorant narrative on Muslims. I would guess that about 40% of the American people are unaware of Muslim Americans who have served and died for their country. Call it a timely civics lesson.

To counter Donald Trump's very dangerous and ignorant narrative on Muslims. I would guess that about 40% of the American people are unaware of Muslim American's who have served and died for their country. Call it a civics lesson.

Why not ask Pat Smith or Charles Woods speak at the DNC??

Donald Trump hasn't said anything to denigrate them or, collectively, their faith ... yet!

Their loss was a lot more recent than Kahn's loss..

Hardly relevant but, this is wholly distasteful and disgraceful comment as the pain of losing a loved one who has faithfully served their country knows know boundaries or end.

ALL have a case to make against Hillary for their childs' deaths..

Let them or others make it.

The fact that Kahn has a FINANCIAL stake in electing Hillary just proves what a scumbag he really is...

Another distasteful and disgraceful comment that has nothing to do with Trumps ignorant and dangerous comments about Muslims and the Kahn family response to them.

But don't try and tell me that the Left Wingery (including everyone here) supports Pat Smith or Charles Woods as much as they support Kahn..

And, this is what separates you from the rest of us ... we acknowledge and sympathize and empathize with the Smith family and Kahn family and, indeed, with all families whose children have paid the ultimate sacrifice in great service of their country. You really should understand this without me writing it in a comment.

Like I said.. Your definition of "serious" is "comments I agree with"... :D

As I have aptly proven with FACTS, Listen's comments are completely in error and non-factual..

I am sure they are "serious" comments.. They are just non-factual comments..

But I gave him the chance to prove me wrong.. Let's see if he can...

Michale

Indeed.

Michale

Why did Hillary have Kahn speak at the DNC??

Why not ask Pat Smith or Charles Woods speak at the DNC??

Their loss was a lot more recent than Kahn's loss..

ALL have a case to make against Hillary for their childs' deaths..

But Kahn won't put the blame on Hillary even though he has every right to..

And THAT is why Kahn was chosen.. Pure unadulterated partisan politics...

The fact that Kahn has a FINANCIAL stake in electing Hillary just proves what a scumbag he really is...

But don't try and tell me that the Left Wingery (including everyone here) supports Pat Smith or Charles Woods as much as they support Kahn..

Because the FACTS clearly show that this is not the case...

It's as much of a bullshit claim as the Balthasar/Apophis claim that the shit-canning of the TOP FOUR positions at the DNC was "usual"...

Like I always say....

AT night... Not LAST night...

Michale

Really?? You would read an article on Rush Limbaugh's website??

Com'on!!! :D

if you had you would have seen the article wasn't written by Maddow.

It's on her website.. Same diff...

No one is saying that there is a difference between the loss the Khan family experienced and the loss felt by those killed at Benghazi.

Really??

So, we must commiserate with Kahn who lost his son 12 years ago in a war that HILLARY CLINTON voted for and supported (Funny how you don't address that), but with Sean Smith's mother, it's perfectly OK to say “I don’t care how many children Pat Smith lost, I would like to beat her to death.”

Want to tell me again how no one is saying there is a difference??

Because I seem to find that incredulous, considering the FACTS that the totality of the Left Wingery (yes, including everyone here) indicates that there *IS* a difference.. As evidenced by the fact that you yourself posted a website OUTLINING the difference..

But, hay.. I am a fair guy... You find me comments from people here in Weigantia about the families of those killed in Benghazi that approach the same sentiments that ya'all have said about this Kahn moron and I'll concede that you are right and I am wrong..

In the absence of such facts, my point stands..

It's the epitome of hypocrisy to support and commiserate Kahn at the same time denigrating and demonizing the parents of those killed in Banghazi due to Hillary's indifference and incompetence..

I am sure you would agree with that, were it not for the Partisan Ideology Filters that are in place...

Michale

Probably the same thing I am thinking about an opinion from Maddow supporting the ludicrous idea that there is a difference between Kahn and the family of those killed in Benghazi due to Hillary's incompetence..

I would actually bother to read the article before commenting on it; if you had you would have seen the article wasn't written by Maddow.

No one is saying that there is a difference between the loss the Khan family experienced and the loss felt by those killed at Benghazi. You are the only one, as usual, making this argument! I don't have any desire to debate a position that I have not taken, nor that I support in any way. Sorry, I just don't have the patience for it anymore. If you have an issue with what someone says on here, that is fine; but taking issue with a position that you claim everyone here holds despite the fact that it has never been stated by anyone on this site has become tiresome.

Probably the same thing I am thinking about an opinion from Maddow supporting the ludicrous idea that there is a difference between Kahn and the family of those killed in Benghazi due to Hillary's incompetence..

I would actually bother to read the article before commenting on it; if you had you would have seen the article wasn't written by Maddow.

No one is saying that there is a difference between the loss the Khan family experienced and the loss felt by those killed at Benghazi. You are the only one, as usual, making this argument! I don't have any desire to debate a position that I have not taken, nor that I support in any way. Sorry, I just don't have the patience for it anymore. If you have an issue with what someone says on here, that is fine; but taking issue with a position that you claim everyone here holds despite the fact that it has never been stated by anyone on this site has become tiresome.

Upwards of 80% of Americans feel this country is heading in the wrong direction...

That's not on Mr Trump... That's on YOU!!

Michale

Obama and the Democrats are running scared.. :D

Michale

Once again proving beyond any doubt that your definition of a "non-serious" comment is a comment that you have no factual rebuttal to.. :D

Look at the facts.. When I gave ya'all your convention to comment freely on without my input, it was ALL about Russia and Trump..

Now that the FACTS clearly show that Hillary is in deep a LOT more with the Russians than Trump is... All of the sudden, no one wants to talk about Russia..

Same thing with the Kahn issue.. Everyone here was "Oh Kahn this" and "Oh Kahn that".... Then when I point out the fact that it was HILLARY'S vote that killed Captain Khan in 2004...... Dead silence.. NO ONE wants to talk about Kahn now...

Call it "non serious" all you want.. But the FACTS clearly show that ya'all *CAN'T* address the facts....

Michale

This is the last non-serious comment from you that I will ever address.

If you wish to converse with me in the future, you will have to produce comments worthy of response.

Once again, the "peace" and "tolerance" of the Left Wingery..

Funny how ya'all slam and attack Trump and his supporters for being violent and advocating violence...

Yet the totality of the Left Wingery is virtually silent when the REAL and DOCUMENTED violence comes from the Left *AGAINST* Trump and his supporters..

Which simply proves beyond any doubt that the Left Wingery doesn't mind violence as long as it's directed towards the Right (pun intended) people...

The facts are clear..

Michale

The hypocrisy from the Left Wingery could NOT be clearer...

:^/

Michale

And then when we find out that Hillary has TONS more connections to Russia and ya'all are reminded that it was HILLARY'S choice and HILLARY'S vote that sent Mr Kahn's son into harm's way...

All of the sudden, there is eerie silence coming from ya'all on Kahn and Russia...

I accept ya'all's concession on both points and, unless new information comes to light, I'll consider these subjects closed..

Michale

Regardless of what the feckless, naïve, leftist ideologue Barack Obama and his dimwitted colleagues John Kerry, Francois Hollande and Angela Merkel state, the United States and the West are at war with Radical Islam. It is the job of the president of the United States to protect his nation from all enemies; foreign and domestic. Unfortunately, Mr. Obama romanticizes Islam and refuses to accept reality, which has resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent people across the world.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/08/01/open-letter-to-mr-khizr-khan.html

Yep

Michale

This guy's 15 mins is long long up..

Michale

[122] apophis: yep!

So, you are agreeing with me that Hillary did in fact lie??

Because that is what comment #122 says... :D

Michale

And it wasn't Chris Wallace that made any insinuations.

It was the WaPo News FACT CHECKER who gave Hillary 4 Pinocchios... That's LIAR LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE territory.. :D

Ya'all usually like FACT CHECKERs.. But, apparently, only when they say what ya'all want to here... :D

Michale

If she DID miss the classification markings, she is incompetent..

But we know she didn't miss classification markings, because we have an email from her telling one of her minions to strip the classifications from a classified document and send it in the clear..

This is FACT...

Hillary Clinton is a liar. This is well documented... It's a fact that over 70% of Americans agree with..

Michale

Sorry.. For some unknown reason, I thought LISTEN had posted this...

My bust...

Michale

Yes, Listen. That is EXACTLY what it means..

So Hillary told the truth when she said that she didn't send any emails marked classified. Period.

She did not tell the truth....

Where documents sent that were marked classified?? You yourself said that they were..

Ergo, Hillary lied when she said she didn't send documents that were marked classified...

The fact that she may or may not have MISSED the classification mark does not change the FACT that the mark WAS present...

Michale

It's also not the same as saying that she lied to the American Public. Oh, how quickly we forget. During the Comey hearings it came out that the whole discussion boils down to three attachments to emails found among the 30,000 emails that the FBI examined. These attachments were marked with little (c) symbols that Comey admitted she could have easily missed, since the primary emails to which these earlier emails were attached weren't themselves marked classified. It turns out that the State Department has said that all three of these email attachments were inappropriately marked anyway. So Hillary told the truth when she said that she didn't send any emails marked classified. Period.

Chris Wallace can make all of the insinuations he wants, but neither he nor all of the Fox viewers (or all the king's men) can change these facts.

I think most people's complaints around here is that I *DON'T* ignore comments.. :D

Michale

You saying it's a fact does not make it a fact..

Yes, I enjoy reading your posts..

Thank you... :D

You take your facts as the only relevant ones.

Not at all.. My ability to accept other facts is well-documented.. But I don't accept facts just because someone says they are facts.. Like your opinion that you try to pass off as fact..

You see your perspective as the only sensible one and your side of the argument as the only valid one.

Until someone gives me FACTS that support a different perspective or side of the argument.. Absolutely...

If a post is made that don't fit your facts or bias you ignore it.

THAT is rich.. :D

Has ANYONE here ever known me to ignore a comment???

heh :D

Have a nice day...

I always do.. :D

Michale

(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/benghazi-conspiracy-theor_b_6215662.html)

A> it's not a fact.. It's a personal opinion..
No, it's a fact

and

2> it's a personal attack and a childish insult.. Usually employed when those insecure persons of lesser intelligence and maturity are confronted with a superior argument...

Talk about insecure...

I've been reading your posts for almost 10 years

Apparently, my posts hold your interest quite well since you have been reading them for a decade.. :D

Yes, I enjoy reading your posts..

If you can't handle facts, then I would respectively suggest that maybe lurking is better suited for you...

No, I don't think so. Thank you anyway.

Here's why you're a non-critical thinker.

You take your facts as the only relevant ones.
You see your perspective as the only sensible one and your side of the argument as the only valid one. If a post is made that don't fit your facts or bias you ignore it.

Have a nice day...

Four Pinocchios
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/07/31/clintons-claim-that-the-fbi-director-said-her-email-answers-were-truthful/

Hillary just can't help herself.

She lies about EVERYTHING.....

Michale

The Left Wingery deifies a man who lost his son 12 years ago, in a war that HILLARY CLINTON supported and voted for....

Then the Left Wingery turns around and vilifies and spits on a mother who lost a son due to Hillary's indifference and/or incompetence...

Yea... Absolutely NO HYPOCRISY from the Left Wingery...

:^/

Michale

So, to a person and/or people who are consumed by ideological filters and Party dogma, it appears my thinking is not critical..

But, I can assure you that, after over two and a half decades in the military, security and LEO fields, I have a highly developed sense of critical thinking..

I just don't deal in bullshit political correctness...

So, I could say where you might be confused... :D

Hope this clarifies things for you.. :D

Michale

A> it's not a fact.. It's a personal opinion..

and

2> it's a personal attack and a childish insult.. Usually employed when those insecure persons of lesser intelligence and maturity are confronted with a superior argument...

I've been reading your posts for almost 10 years

Apparently, my posts hold your interest quite well since you have been reading them for a decade.. :D

If you can't handle facts, then I would respectively suggest that maybe lurking is better suited for you...

I'm just sayin'... :D

Michale

Not exactly a critical thinker is he...

When one can't argue facts.... One always turns to immature personal attacks and childish insults..

Bullshit!

I've been reading your posts for almost 10 years, and you are not a critical thinker. And that's a fact...

When one can't argue facts.... One always turns to immature personal attacks and childish insults..

:D

Michale

Enough, Michale. Move on to something else. You are not doing yourself any favours.

Not exactly a critical thinker is he...

And THAT is the ONLY good thing that someone can say about Hillary Clinton...

Michale

CLINTON AHEAD IN POLLS *ONE SINGLE DAY* IN JULY
http://www.latimes.com/politics/

Put that in yer pipe and smoke it.. :D

Michale

Let's talk about the Russian connection, eh? :D

Report: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Mgr John Podesta Sat on Board of Company that Bagged $35 Million from Putin-Connected Russian Govt Fund
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/report-hillary-clintons-campaign-mgr-john-podesta-sat-board-company-bagged-35-million-putin-connected-russian-govt-fund-2/

What???

Now that I have proven that Russian connections to the Clinton campaign run long and deep, NOW no one wants to talk about Russia anymore???

I am shocked, SHOCKED I tell you!!! :D

Michale

Demcorats.. The most shameful species on the planet.. :^/

Michale

But credit where credit is due..

Yes.. You can cherry pick polls, just like I can.. :D

Michale

Wasn't aware the RABA ran Presidential Polls

:D

The poll was a bipartisan poll that was not paid for by any candidate, party, or organization."

The Washington Examiner is showing a similar convention bounce for Clinton in the same range, at 7 percent.

Oh..I see how it is..

*I* have to wait til at least 4 Aug to point to polls...

I guess ya'all are under no such restrictions..

Color me shocked.. :D

Michale

To be fair, now the NY POST has to run naked pictures of Bill Clinton...

{bbbaaarrrrrfff}

:D heh

Michale

"A new poll taken after the Democratic convention revealed that Hillary Clinton had erased any gains that Trump made after the Republican convention, with a 10 point convention bounce and a 15 point lead.

RABA Research found:
Among likely voters, Clinton garners 46% support to Trump’s 31%. Libertarian Gary Johnson now captures 7% of the vote, while Jill Stein sits at 2%.

The RABA poll showed Clinton opening up a 7 point lead with men (42%-35%), a 22 point lead with women (50%-28%). Clinton also had 14% of the Republican vote, and she led by double digits with all age groups.

The poll was a bipartisan poll that was not paid for by any candidate, party, or organization."

The Washington Examiner is showing a similar convention bounce for Clinton in the same range, at 7 percent.

Ahhh yes....

The peace and tolerance of the Left Wingery...

Such a joy to behold, eh?? :^/

Michale

I can understand ya'all's frustrations..

Michale

OK... I won't talk about how bad Hillary Clinton is if ya'all cease talking about how bad Donald Trump is..

Deal??? :D

You are not doing yourself any favours.

Au contraire... :D

Michale

Apparently, Mr Kahn doesn't remember that it wasn't Donald Trump who voted for the war in Iraq that killed his son..

It was HILLARY CLINTON who voted for the war in Iraq that killed Kahn's son...

What happened to Kahn's son 12 years ago is not on Donald Trump, it's on Hillary Clinton...

But ya'all ignore that little FACT, don'tcha??

Why?? Because it doesn't fit ya'all's partisan agenda...

Such blatant hypocrisy in using an American hero that was killed 12 years ago just to further a Party agenda??

Well, that's just sad...

Michale

http://theamericanmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/media.jpg

This is the EXACT blatant hypocrisy that I was referring to above....

And ya'all just ignore it... Because of your Partisan Ideological Filters..

Michale

Michale

Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel and Cisco, made major financial contributions to Skolkovo, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion. In May 2010, the State Department facilitated a Moscow visit by 22 of the biggest names in U.S. venture capital—and weeks later the first memorandums of understanding were signed by Skolkovo and American companies.

Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised alarms among U.S. military experts and federal law-enforcement officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a “vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.”
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-clinton-foundation-state-and-kremlin-connections-1469997195

Fine.. Let's talk about Russian connections..

But, we're going to talk about *ALL* the Russian connections..

Not just the one's that further ya'all's partisan Party agenda...

Michale

Grown-ups would have mentioned that a priest had been martyred. But they were too busy crowning a queen and living happily ever after.
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20160729_Webhed_here.html

That's what ya'all don't get..

Yes, the GOP convention was dark. These are dark times.. THAT is the reality of the here and now..

The Dem convention was nothing but rainbows and lollipops and unicorns..

"BURY YOUR HEADS IN THE SAND!! IGNORE THE PROBLEMS WE FACE AND THEY WON'T HURT US"

THAT is the message that the DEM convention sent...

Americans prefer reality to rainbows, lollipops and unicorns...

That's why 17 qualified politicians were discarded by the wayside in favor of Donald Trump...

Michale

Trump's campaign slogan???

Nope... Barack Obama's campaign slogan...

It's more apropos and dead on ballz accurate today than it was 8 years ago...

Michale

Another point I made above that was disputed...

Americans want things to change.. They don't really care that the change MAY be bad... They just want things to change..

And THAT is a perfect indication on how bad Obama and the Demcorats have frak'ed things up..

Americans are so pissed off and so disgruntled they are saying, "I DON'T CARE IF THE CHANGE IS GOOD OR BAD!!! THINGS JUST NEED TO CHANGE!!!"

A very illogical and emotional way of looking at things, but it is indicative of how bad things have been frak'ed up by the current President and his Party.....

Michale

FACT #1. Upwards of 80% of Americans think this country is heading in the wrong direction.

FACT #2. Hillary is the candidate who is a continuation of the same wrong direction.

Couple those facts with the Anti-Establishment mood of the country and the fact that Trump is to the left of Hillary on MANY issues progressives care about and that every terrorist attack (of which ya'all HAVE to know that there will be dozens more) every ambush of LEOs by (O)BLM scumbags will cause Trump's numbers to rise and Hillary's to sink.....

Add all of this up and it's clear that Hillary doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell... No mythical Blue Wall will save her...

Michale

most polling has "wrong direction" under 70%, not over.

In a Gallup poll two weeks ago, just 17 percent of respondents said that the country was on the right track, while 82 percent said it was on the wrong track. In an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shortly before that, the corresponding figures were 18 percent and 73 percent.

EIGHTY TWO PERCENT of Americans think this country is going in the wrong direction...

And you honestly believe that Hillary's promise of keeping on that SAME wrong direction is going to get her elected??

On what planet?? :D

Mcihale

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/tale-two-grieving-parents

Good article that points out the major differences between the two.

What would you say about an opinion from Rush Limbaugh supporting a position contrary to yours???

Probably the same thing I am thinking about an opinion from Maddow supporting the ludicrous idea that there is a difference between Kahn and the family of those killed in Benghazi due to Hillary's incompetence..

The families of those killed in Benghazi by Hillary's incompetence are spit on by the Left Wingery and called liars by Hillary..

None of you say boo...

A muslim uses his dead son to attack Trump and he is the cat's meow... If he supported Trump, ya'all wouldn't care about him OR his dead son... Just like ya'all don't care about those killed at Benghazi..

It's nothing but partisan ideology... Nothing more...

Michale

If Trump said he wants to ban muslim immigrants, then you would have a point.

But he didn't, so you don't..

benghazi on the other hand is an issue where hillary has been proven over 33 hearings and 13 reports by 10 congressional committees to have done NOTHING wrong, and still gets unjustly blamed for factors beyond her control. the benghazi victims' parents have every right to advocate on their children's behalf, but any attempt by them to blame hillary for their loss is misguided.

Right. Hillary did nothing wrong. Except ignore 600 requests for security upgrades...

There is no difference between Kahn and Mrs Smith...

One says what ya'all want to hear so ya'all support them..

The other says what ya'all DON'T want to hear so they are demonized and called liars...

Michale

http://www.newsy.com/videos/clinton-trump-a-gorilla-what-a-unique-question-tells-us-about-polls/

all the best!

JL

good comparison.

Khan spoke the truth about Trump’s proposed Muslim ban, about American principles of diversity and respect, and religious liberty under the Constitution.

To see these two appearances as effectively identical because of their superficial similarities is to have missed the point of their remarks entirely.

not just what i want to hear, but what i know is right. khan is an explicit example of an issue (banning muslim immigrants) on which donald has always been wrong and continues to be wrong, in spite of his surrogates' attempts to dissemble on his behalf.

benghazi on the other hand is an issue where hillary has been proven over 33 hearings and 13 reports by 10 congressional committees to have done NOTHING wrong, and still gets unjustly blamed for factors beyond her control. the benghazi victims' parents have every right to advocate on their children's behalf, but any attempt by them to blame hillary for their loss is misguided.

JL

Good article that points out the major differences between the two.

Funny how ya'all are supportive of Kahn speaking for his son..

Yet ya'all are completely dismissive when Sean Smith's mom speaks for HER son...

So, please..

Ya'all support and sympathize with Kahn because he says what ya'all want to hear..

Ya'all ignore and ridicule the families of those killed by Hillary's incompetence in Benghazi because they say what ya'all DON'T want to hear...

Spare me the crocodile sympathies.. As with everything else, it's all motivated by ideological slavery...

Michale

No, I do not..

Interesting....

I am glad we have common ground on at least that point...

Good ta know... :D

Michale

No, I do not..

"So, since Trump doesn't benefit from CU, then you would support Trump for POTUS?? :D"

No, I would not...

So, since Trump doesn't benefit from CU, then you would support Trump for POTUS?? :D

Michale

So, you don't support Hillary Clinton for POTUS???

Michale

No, I do not support any candidate, left or right that might benefit..

Other than they are against Trump...

as i said, you've said nothing to prove any of them wrong.

JL

i would and i have. yourself, for instance...

JL

Yet you support any Left Winger that benefits from it...

You are not making anysense..

Oh, but he is and has a need for other peoples money..

That's your unsubstantiated claim...

Bullshit!!

See above...

Right on..

Exactly...

Michale

No it's unacceptable no matter who benefits from it.

"Trump is not IN the "money race"... He has no need of other people's money..."

Oh, but he is and has a need for other peoples money..

"He is beholden to no one but the voters.."

Bullshit!!

"Clinton cannot make the same claim..."

Right on..

And being that people join #NeverTrump would indicate that their opinions on Trump are biased and, therefore, not worthy of consideration...

but they're giving the dems credit, and you've said nothing to prove any of them wrong.

Other than they are against Trump...

Would you listen to a Trump supporter about Hillary and give their opinions any merit??

No you would not...

So, here we are...

Michale

whether or not a person is an affirmed racist has no bearing on whether or not their statements can be proven incorrect.

being that they are racists, they are more likely to MAKE statements on racial themes that are demonstrably incorrect. however, their status as racists does not in and of itself constitute an argument against the veracity of any specific statement.

all of which leaves us back at your ad hominem arguments against the thirteen cited conservative pundits being completely without merit. not a single one of them likes hillary clinton either, but they're giving the dems credit, and you've said nothing to prove any of them wrong.

JL

JL

So, the issue that would "destroy democracy as we know it" is perfectly acceptable if the Left Wingery can benefit from it..

And how is this not blatant hypocrisy???

and right now Trump is losing and Clinton is winning in the money race.

Trump is not IN the "money race"... He has no need of other people's money...

He is beholden to no one but the voters..

Clinton cannot make the same claim...

Michale

"That's different"

:D

Michale

So, you are saying that a racist's views of black or white people is perfectly valid??

On what planet?? :D

Michale

never is, never was. an ad hominem argument is never a valid refutation of a statement, and your continued insistence that they can be just weakens your stance.

JL

So, it doesn't bother you that your most sworn and hated enemies, enemies that ya'all have denigrated and demonized to hell and back are buying your candidate???

In other words, all that matters is that the person with the -D after their name is the winner..

Integrity?? Principles?? Morality?? FRAK THAT!!!

Party uber alles....

Gotcha... :^/

Michale