<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Poll Watch -- May, 2016</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/02/opw1605/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/02/opw1605/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:08:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Speak2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/02/opw1605/#comment-76287</link>
		<dc:creator>Speak2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12302#comment-76287</guid>
		<description>While it&#039;s a good bet that Obama&#039;s numbers will inch up throughout the year, we will see a bit of a drop during and right after the Republican Convention followed by the numbers going right back up with the Dem Convention.

That&#039;s my guess, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it's a good bet that Obama's numbers will inch up throughout the year, we will see a bit of a drop during and right after the Republican Convention followed by the numbers going right back up with the Dem Convention.</p>
<p>That's my guess, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speak2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/02/opw1605/#comment-76286</link>
		<dc:creator>Speak2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12302#comment-76286</guid>
		<description>Reagan&#039;s lame-duck polling jump was really the result of HW Bush&#039;s victory. It was basically a third honeymoon period for Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reagan's lame-duck polling jump was really the result of HW Bush's victory. It was basically a third honeymoon period for Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/02/opw1605/#comment-76276</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 09:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12302#comment-76276</guid>
		<description>The elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about is the Comey recommendation..

That&#039;s going to affect Obama&#039;s Poll Numbers as much as it&#039;s going to affect Hillary&#039;s campaign...

Depending on what Obama does, his approval numbers will shoot sky high or drop to the depths of hell for a sit down with Crowley...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about is the Comey recommendation..</p>
<p>That's going to affect Obama's Poll Numbers as much as it's going to affect Hillary's campaign...</p>
<p>Depending on what Obama does, his approval numbers will shoot sky high or drop to the depths of hell for a sit down with Crowley...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/02/opw1605/#comment-76264</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 23:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12302#comment-76264</guid>
		<description>honestly most of the fluctuations we&#039;ve seen are small enough to be attributable to measurement error. i&#039;ve long maintained that obama has had an average presidency and has garnered average ratings to go with it, never deviating too far from 47.5% in favor, 47.5% against and 5% undecided. the rest is mostly hype, in one direction or another.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honestly most of the fluctuations we've seen are small enough to be attributable to measurement error. i've long maintained that obama has had an average presidency and has garnered average ratings to go with it, never deviating too far from 47.5% in favor, 47.5% against and 5% undecided. the rest is mostly hype, in one direction or another.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
