<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points [393] -- Paul Ryan, Democrat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 17:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76279</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 09:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76279</guid>
		<description>If anyone can actually contact Mike Godwin, please pass on my congratulations for neutering and demolishing a heretofore enduring &#039;Net meme all for the sake of pushing an unpopular political partisan agenda..  :^/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone can actually contact Mike Godwin, please pass on my congratulations for neutering and demolishing a heretofore enduring 'Net meme all for the sake of pushing an unpopular political partisan agenda..  :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76278</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 09:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76278</guid>
		<description>Basically, the GODWIN Rule is now nothing more than a politically expedient guideline..

No one can EVER use the GODWIN as it was intended to be used..

Good job, Mike!!  :^/  You just frak&#039;ed up your own legacy...  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, the GODWIN Rule is now nothing more than a politically expedient guideline..</p>
<p>No one can EVER use the GODWIN as it was intended to be used..</p>
<p>Good job, Mike!!  :^/  You just frak'ed up your own legacy...  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76277</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 09:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76277</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;to paraphrase mike GODWIN:

in some ways trump IS like hitler.&lt;/I&gt;

Just like a Liberal to break his own rules for the purposes  of pushing a partisan agenda...

He&#039;s almost as bad as a Republican...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>to paraphrase mike GODWIN:</p>
<p>in some ways trump IS like hitler.</i></p>
<p>Just like a Liberal to break his own rules for the purposes  of pushing a partisan agenda...</p>
<p>He's almost as bad as a Republican...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76273</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 08:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76273</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;likely, but not provable unless one is predisposed to believe that to be so.&lt;/I&gt;

But we&#039;re not in a court of law.

We&#039;re just 2 schmoes shootin&#039; the stuff over beers...

&lt;I&gt; clinton has said she believed it was allowed, and was mistaken. &lt;/I&gt;

She was the SECRETARY OF STATE!  She RAN the Department..

So, instead of a liar, she is incompetent...

&lt;I&gt;to prove a lie you need to prove she KNEW it wasn&#039;t allowed before the IG ruled that it wasn&#039;t. &lt;/I&gt;

She signed agreements when she accepted the position that she knew the rules..  The FAM is *THE* operators manual for the State Dept.. Hillary signed papers saying she has read and understood the rules..

&lt;I&gt;i concede that this meets the civil standard of &quot;more likely than not,&quot; but the evidence is insufficient to establish criminality.&lt;/I&gt;

We&#039;re not trying to establish criminality.  We&#039;re trying to agree that Hillary lied..

&lt;I&gt;. in any case, good choice, that is the strongest argument you&#039;ve made.&lt;/I&gt;

Danke..  :D

&lt;I&gt;in some ways trump IS like hitler.&lt;/I&gt;

Godwin&#039;s a geek and has the hots for Hillary..  

Whatcha gonna do?  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>likely, but not provable unless one is predisposed to believe that to be so.</i></p>
<p>But we're not in a court of law.</p>
<p>We're just 2 schmoes shootin' the stuff over beers...</p>
<p><i> clinton has said she believed it was allowed, and was mistaken. </i></p>
<p>She was the SECRETARY OF STATE!  She RAN the Department..</p>
<p>So, instead of a liar, she is incompetent...</p>
<p><i>to prove a lie you need to prove she KNEW it wasn't allowed before the IG ruled that it wasn't. </i></p>
<p>She signed agreements when she accepted the position that she knew the rules..  The FAM is *THE* operators manual for the State Dept.. Hillary signed papers saying she has read and understood the rules..</p>
<p><i>i concede that this meets the civil standard of "more likely than not," but the evidence is insufficient to establish criminality.</i></p>
<p>We're not trying to establish criminality.  We're trying to agree that Hillary lied..</p>
<p><i>. in any case, good choice, that is the strongest argument you've made.</i></p>
<p>Danke..  :D</p>
<p><i>in some ways trump IS like hitler.</i></p>
<p>Godwin's a geek and has the hots for Hillary..  </p>
<p>Whatcha gonna do?  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76262</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 23:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76262</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The State Dept IG clearly states that there is no evidence that this is true..

Ergo, Hillary lied..&lt;/i&gt;

likely, but not provable unless one is predisposed to believe that to be so. clinton has said she believed it was allowed, and was mistaken. to prove a lie you need to prove she KNEW it wasn&#039;t allowed before the IG ruled that it wasn&#039;t. which you haven&#039;t.

i concede that this meets the civil standard of &quot;more likely than not,&quot; but the evidence is insufficient to establish criminality. in any case, good choice, that is the strongest argument you&#039;ve made.

&lt;i&gt;In other words, as long as he has a &#039;-D&#039; after his name, the Left Wingery would vote en masse for Adolf Hitler or Attila the Hun or Good Dog Carl...

To paraphrase Michael Goodwin...&lt;/i&gt;

to paraphrase mike GODWIN:

&lt;b&gt;in some ways trump IS like hitler.&lt;/b&gt;

See, I can paraphrase too!

;)
JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The State Dept IG clearly states that there is no evidence that this is true..</p>
<p>Ergo, Hillary lied..</i></p>
<p>likely, but not provable unless one is predisposed to believe that to be so. clinton has said she believed it was allowed, and was mistaken. to prove a lie you need to prove she KNEW it wasn't allowed before the IG ruled that it wasn't. which you haven't.</p>
<p>i concede that this meets the civil standard of "more likely than not," but the evidence is insufficient to establish criminality. in any case, good choice, that is the strongest argument you've made.</p>
<p><i>In other words, as long as he has a '-D' after his name, the Left Wingery would vote en masse for Adolf Hitler or Attila the Hun or Good Dog Carl...</p>
<p>To paraphrase Michael Goodwin...</i></p>
<p>to paraphrase mike GODWIN:</p>
<p><b>in some ways trump IS like hitler.</b></p>
<p>See, I can paraphrase too!</p>
<p>;)<br />
JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76255</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76255</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s past time to admit what is glaringly obvious....

It&#039;s MUCH less important to have a candidate of integrity and honesty than it is having a Democrat in the White House.....

In other words, as long as he has a &#039;-D&#039; after his name, the Left Wingery would vote en masse for Adolf Hitler or Attila the Hun or Good Dog Carl...&lt;/I&gt;

To be completely fair, it&#039;s the same exact thing for the Right Wingery...

To paraphrase Michael Goodwin....

&lt;B&gt;In a world with honor and integrity are valued, neither Clinton NOR Trump could be elected dog catcher...&lt;/B&gt;

So, don&#039;t think I am singling out JUST the Left Wingery...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It's past time to admit what is glaringly obvious....</p>
<p>It's MUCH less important to have a candidate of integrity and honesty than it is having a Democrat in the White House.....</p>
<p>In other words, as long as he has a '-D' after his name, the Left Wingery would vote en masse for Adolf Hitler or Attila the Hun or Good Dog Carl...</i></p>
<p>To be completely fair, it's the same exact thing for the Right Wingery...</p>
<p>To paraphrase Michael Goodwin....</p>
<p><b>In a world with honor and integrity are valued, neither Clinton NOR Trump could be elected dog catcher...</b></p>
<p>So, don't think I am singling out JUST the Left Wingery...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76240</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76240</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;It’s zombie time at campaign Hillary. Behold the dead men walking! It was with strangely slow, narcotized numbness that the candidate and her phalanx of minions and mouthpieces responded to last week’s punishing report by the State Department’s Inspector General about her email security lapses. Do they truly believe, in the rosy alternate universe of Hillaryland, that they can lie their way out of this? Of course, they’re relying as usual on the increasingly restive mainstream media to do their dirty work for them. If it were a Republican in the crosshairs, Hillary’s shocking refusal to meet with the Inspector General (who interviewed all four of the other living Secretaries of State of the past two decades) would have been the lead item flagged in screaming headlines from coast to coast. Let’s face it—the genuinely innocent do not do pretzel twists like this to cover their asses.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.salon.com/2016/06/02/zombie_time_at_campaign_hillary_camille_paglia_on_trumps_real_strength_and_clintons_fatal_sleepwalking/

It&#039;s past time to admit what is glaringly obvious....

It&#039;s MUCH  less important to have a candidate of integrity and honesty than it is having a Democrat in the White House.....

In other words, as long as he has a &#039;-D&#039; after his name, the Left Wingery would vote en masse for Adolf Hitler or Attila the Hun or Good Dog Carl...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>It’s zombie time at campaign Hillary. Behold the dead men walking! It was with strangely slow, narcotized numbness that the candidate and her phalanx of minions and mouthpieces responded to last week’s punishing report by the State Department’s Inspector General about her email security lapses. Do they truly believe, in the rosy alternate universe of Hillaryland, that they can lie their way out of this? Of course, they’re relying as usual on the increasingly restive mainstream media to do their dirty work for them. If it were a Republican in the crosshairs, Hillary’s shocking refusal to meet with the Inspector General (who interviewed all four of the other living Secretaries of State of the past two decades) would have been the lead item flagged in screaming headlines from coast to coast. Let’s face it—the genuinely innocent do not do pretzel twists like this to cover their asses.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.salon.com/2016/06/02/zombie_time_at_campaign_hillary_camille_paglia_on_trumps_real_strength_and_clintons_fatal_sleepwalking/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/2016/06/02/zombie_time_at_campaign_hillary_camille_paglia_on_trumps_real_strength_and_clintons_fatal_sleepwalking/</a></p>
<p>It's past time to admit what is glaringly obvious....</p>
<p>It's MUCH  less important to have a candidate of integrity and honesty than it is having a Democrat in the White House.....</p>
<p>In other words, as long as he has a '-D' after his name, the Left Wingery would vote en masse for Adolf Hitler or Attila the Hun or Good Dog Carl...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76233</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76233</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The State Dept IG clearly states that there is no evidence that this is true..

Ergo, Hillary lied..&lt;/I&gt;

And if you use the old EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE IS NOT ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE response, I&#039;ll be very disappointed..  :D

If someone had authorized Hillary to use her insecure, hackable, hacked home-brewed, bathroom closet email server and she can&#039;t name the name and the State Dept IG  found NO EVIDENCE that anyone had authorized then it&#039;s stone cold clear that there was no such authorization...

Such authorization would have to be in writing anyways...  Because if Hillary HAD gotten authorization for violating the FAM, you would HAVE to know that she would demand it in writing to cover her ass...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The State Dept IG clearly states that there is no evidence that this is true..</p>
<p>Ergo, Hillary lied..</i></p>
<p>And if you use the old EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE IS NOT ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE response, I'll be very disappointed..  :D</p>
<p>If someone had authorized Hillary to use her insecure, hackable, hacked home-brewed, bathroom closet email server and she can't name the name and the State Dept IG  found NO EVIDENCE that anyone had authorized then it's stone cold clear that there was no such authorization...</p>
<p>Such authorization would have to be in writing anyways...  Because if Hillary HAD gotten authorization for violating the FAM, you would HAVE to know that she would demand it in writing to cover her ass...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76230</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76230</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;pick the one or two &lt;/I&gt;

Hillary claimed over and over that she had authorization to run her insecure, hackable, hacked home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...

The State Dept IG clearly states that there is no evidence that this is true..

Ergo, Hillary lied..

&lt;I&gt;but otherwise a photo of you wearing a hillary is my hero t-shirt is all the satisfaction i need ;)&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s funny.  Because I was thinking the EXACT same thing when you wear your HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016 T-shirt..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>pick the one or two </i></p>
<p>Hillary claimed over and over that she had authorization to run her insecure, hackable, hacked home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...</p>
<p>The State Dept IG clearly states that there is no evidence that this is true..</p>
<p>Ergo, Hillary lied..</p>
<p><i>but otherwise a photo of you wearing a hillary is my hero t-shirt is all the satisfaction i need ;)</i></p>
<p>That's funny.  Because I was thinking the EXACT same thing when you wear your HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016 T-shirt..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76224</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76224</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nope.. Ya can&#039;t...
Because they are all dead on ballz accurate with facts to prove it...&lt;/i&gt;

yes i can and no they aren&#039;t, but i won&#039;t, because as much as i like ya, i&#039;m not willing nor able to spend that much time. pick the one or two you&#039;re most sure of and maybe i&#039;ll bite, but otherwise a photo of you wearing a hillary is my hero t-shirt is all the satisfaction i need ;)

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nope.. Ya can't...<br />
Because they are all dead on ballz accurate with facts to prove it...</i></p>
<p>yes i can and no they aren't, but i won't, because as much as i like ya, i'm not willing nor able to spend that much time. pick the one or two you're most sure of and maybe i'll bite, but otherwise a photo of you wearing a hillary is my hero t-shirt is all the satisfaction i need ;)</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76200</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76200</guid>
		<description>http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/top-hillary-aide-suffers-memory-loss-in-deposition/

WOW...

Talk about being evasive.....  

Ya know another word for being evasive??

LYING....

At least that&#039;s the word when it&#039;s a person who has a &#039;-R&#039; after their name....  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/top-hillary-aide-suffers-memory-loss-in-deposition/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/top-hillary-aide-suffers-memory-loss-in-deposition/</a></p>
<p>WOW...</p>
<p>Talk about being evasive.....  </p>
<p>Ya know another word for being evasive??</p>
<p>LYING....</p>
<p>At least that's the word when it's a person who has a '-R' after their name....  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76199</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76199</guid>
		<description>The idea that the State Dept IG report is meaningless or actually helps Clinton, which is the argument ya&#039;all appear to be supporting is ludicrous...

Clinton&#039;s integrity (such as it is) was DEVASTATED by the IG report..  There is NOTHING in that report that helped Klan Clinton...

About the ONLY good thing a Clinton fanatic can say is that it didn&#039;t show any criminal activity..

Which is a pretty damning critique of Hillary Clinton that her ONLY bright spot is that she didn&#039;t commit a crime...  

But the IG Report was NOT for detailing criminal activity..

That&#039;s what the FBI investigation is all about...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;But it&#039;s just a security review&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Note to Klan Clinton...  

FBI don&#039;t do &quot;security reviews&quot;... What part of Federal Bureau of &lt;B&gt;INVESTIGATION&lt;/B&gt; does Klan Clinton not understand??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that the State Dept IG report is meaningless or actually helps Clinton, which is the argument ya'all appear to be supporting is ludicrous...</p>
<p>Clinton's integrity (such as it is) was DEVASTATED by the IG report..  There is NOTHING in that report that helped Klan Clinton...</p>
<p>About the ONLY good thing a Clinton fanatic can say is that it didn't show any criminal activity..</p>
<p>Which is a pretty damning critique of Hillary Clinton that her ONLY bright spot is that she didn't commit a crime...  </p>
<p>But the IG Report was NOT for detailing criminal activity..</p>
<p>That's what the FBI investigation is all about...</p>
<p><b>"But it's just a security review"</b></p>
<p>Note to Klan Clinton...  </p>
<p>FBI don't do "security reviews"... What part of Federal Bureau of <b>INVESTIGATION</b> does Klan Clinton not understand??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76194</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76194</guid>
		<description>Of course, you can PROVE those are fallacies, right??

Nope.. Ya can&#039;t...

Because they are all dead on ballz accurate with facts to prove it...

Of course, if one indulges in &quot;it depends on what the definition of &#039;is&#039; is&quot; type arguments, one can obfuscate the facts...

But the facts ARE the facts..

Hillary lied.. The State Dept IG Report &lt;B&gt;**PROVES**&lt;/B&gt; that beyond ANY doubt..

But, by all means.. Give it a shot..  It amuses me..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, you can PROVE those are fallacies, right??</p>
<p>Nope.. Ya can't...</p>
<p>Because they are all dead on ballz accurate with facts to prove it...</p>
<p>Of course, if one indulges in "it depends on what the definition of 'is' is" type arguments, one can obfuscate the facts...</p>
<p>But the facts ARE the facts..</p>
<p>Hillary lied.. The State Dept IG Report <b>**PROVES**</b> that beyond ANY doubt..</p>
<p>But, by all means.. Give it a shot..  It amuses me..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76187</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76187</guid>
		<description>wow, that&#039;s seventeen straight fallacies. if i had the time and energy i&#039;d respond to one or two, but why not add ex-silentio to the growing list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, that's seventeen straight fallacies. if i had the time and energy i'd respond to one or two, but why not add ex-silentio to the growing list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76183</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 20:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76183</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“Had Secretary Clinton known of any concerns about her email setup at the time, she would have taken steps to address them. She believed she was following the practices of other Secretaries and senior officials.”&lt;/i&gt;

And yet HILLARY CLINTON is the **ONLY** former SecState who REFUSED to speak to the IG about this issue...

So Hillary LIED when she said she would be willing to talk to &quot;ANYBODY&quot; at &quot;ANYTIME&quot;.....

Hillary = Liar

&lt;B&gt;NO&lt;/B&gt; other explanation fits the facts...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“Had Secretary Clinton known of any concerns about her email setup at the time, she would have taken steps to address them. She believed she was following the practices of other Secretaries and senior officials.”</i></p>
<p>And yet HILLARY CLINTON is the **ONLY** former SecState who REFUSED to speak to the IG about this issue...</p>
<p>So Hillary LIED when she said she would be willing to talk to "ANYBODY" at "ANYTIME".....</p>
<p>Hillary = Liar</p>
<p><b>NO</b> other explanation fits the facts...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76179</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76179</guid>
		<description>If ya&#039;all think things are bad now...  Wait til Director Comey issues his recommendation to indict!!!  :D

Ya&#039;all might want to run away to Tahiti...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ya'all think things are bad now...  Wait til Director Comey issues his recommendation to indict!!!  :D</p>
<p>Ya'all might want to run away to Tahiti...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76178</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 19:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76178</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Pay no attention to that private, insecure, hacked, bathroom closet email server behind the curtain.. A poor gorilla was needlessly murdered.. THAT&#039;s the only story ya&#039;all need to worry about..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Klan Clinton

:^/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Pay no attention to that private, insecure, hacked, bathroom closet email server behind the curtain.. A poor gorilla was needlessly murdered.. THAT's the only story ya'all need to worry about.."</b><br />
-Klan Clinton</p>
<p>:^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76176</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 18:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76176</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Every since Hillary&#039;s private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server became public knowledge.....

EVERY STATEMENT HILLARY HAS GIVEN TO EXCUSE HER ACTIONS HAVE BEEN FALSE&lt;/I&gt;

Well, we have a NEW explanation from Klan Clinton...

&lt;B&gt;“Had Secretary Clinton known of any concerns about her email setup at the time, she would have taken steps to address them. She believed she was following the practices of other Secretaries and senior officials.”&lt;/B&gt;

OK, so the SECRETARY OF STATE didn&#039;t know the FAM????

And this rhymes-with-witch wants to be PRESIDENT!!!????

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Oh, jeeze.. I&#039;m sorry.. I didn&#039;t know I wasn&#039;t supposed to give our battle plans and nuclear launch codes to Russia, China, North Korea and ISIS...  

My bad...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-President Hillary Clinton

And there are people who actually think Hillary is COMPETENT!!!

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Fascinating&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Spock

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Every since Hillary's private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server became public knowledge.....</p>
<p>EVERY STATEMENT HILLARY HAS GIVEN TO EXCUSE HER ACTIONS HAVE BEEN FALSE</i></p>
<p>Well, we have a NEW explanation from Klan Clinton...</p>
<p><b>“Had Secretary Clinton known of any concerns about her email setup at the time, she would have taken steps to address them. She believed she was following the practices of other Secretaries and senior officials.”</b></p>
<p>OK, so the SECRETARY OF STATE didn't know the FAM????</p>
<p>And this rhymes-with-witch wants to be PRESIDENT!!!????</p>
<p><b>"Oh, jeeze.. I'm sorry.. I didn't know I wasn't supposed to give our battle plans and nuclear launch codes to Russia, China, North Korea and ISIS...  </p>
<p>My bad..."</b><br />
-President Hillary Clinton</p>
<p>And there are people who actually think Hillary is COMPETENT!!!</p>
<p><b>"Fascinating"</b><br />
-Spock</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76174</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 16:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76174</guid>
		<description>And on the subject of the Brexit???

https://youtu.be/j0pwXLtvt2w

That clears it up for me....  

Why would ANY Brit want to stay in the EU is beyond me...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on the subject of the Brexit???</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/j0pwXLtvt2w" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/j0pwXLtvt2w</a></p>
<p>That clears it up for me....  </p>
<p>Why would ANY Brit want to stay in the EU is beyond me...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76173</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76173</guid>
		<description>And, on another note..

&lt;B&gt;Predatory Peacekeepers – UN Soldiers Are Committing Widespread Child Rape&lt;/B&gt;
http://heatst.com/uk/predatory-peacekeepers-un-soldiers-are-committing-widespread-child-rape/

Yea...  Let&#039;s put the UN in charge of everything...

What could POSSIBLY go wrong???  :^/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, on another note..</p>
<p><b>Predatory Peacekeepers – UN Soldiers Are Committing Widespread Child Rape</b><br />
<a href="http://heatst.com/uk/predatory-peacekeepers-un-soldiers-are-committing-widespread-child-rape/" rel="nofollow">http://heatst.com/uk/predatory-peacekeepers-un-soldiers-are-committing-widespread-child-rape/</a></p>
<p>Yea...  Let's put the UN in charge of everything...</p>
<p>What could POSSIBLY go wrong???  :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76170</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 16:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76170</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the one point that ya&#039;all try to equivocate and mitigate away...

Every since Hillary&#039;s  private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server became public knowledge.....

&lt;B&gt;EVERY STATEMENT HILLARY HAS GIVEN TO EXCUSE HER ACTIONS HAVE BEEN FALSE&lt;/B&gt;

Now, ya&#039;all can leap to your Democrat&#039;s defense with mitigation and excuses like &quot;lawyerly evasions&quot; and &quot;misleading&quot; and the like...

But no one.... Let me repeat that for the cheap seats...  &lt;B&gt;NO ONE&lt;/B&gt; can deny that EVERY excuse that Hillary gave for her  EXCLUSIVE use of a private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server... EVERY excuse... EVERY reason... 

.....Has been false...

This is an undeniable and inarguable FACT.....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's the one point that ya'all try to equivocate and mitigate away...</p>
<p>Every since Hillary's  private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server became public knowledge.....</p>
<p><b>EVERY STATEMENT HILLARY HAS GIVEN TO EXCUSE HER ACTIONS HAVE BEEN FALSE</b></p>
<p>Now, ya'all can leap to your Democrat's defense with mitigation and excuses like "lawyerly evasions" and "misleading" and the like...</p>
<p>But no one.... Let me repeat that for the cheap seats...  <b>NO ONE</b> can deny that EVERY excuse that Hillary gave for her  EXCLUSIVE use of a private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server... EVERY excuse... EVERY reason... </p>
<p>.....Has been false...</p>
<p>This is an undeniable and inarguable FACT.....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76169</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76169</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;But, as Krongard indicated, the May 25 IG report clearly stated that Rice did not use personal email for government business. It said Powell used personal email on a limited basis to connect with people outside the department, and he worked with the State Department to secure the system. The report found Clinton did neither.

The report concluded Clinton’s use of a private server and account was not approved, and broke agency rules. The report said by the time she became secretary, the rules had repeatedly been updated, and were “considerably more detailed and more sophisticated.”&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/31/former-state-dept-watchdog-debunks-central-clinton-email-claim.html?intcmp=hpcmt

Well, now we have heard from a GOP State Dept IG and a DEM State Dept IG...

Both saying the same things...

And ya&#039;all maintain that THEY are BOTH wrong and Hillary is right..???   :D

The partisan bias is strong here...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>But, as Krongard indicated, the May 25 IG report clearly stated that Rice did not use personal email for government business. It said Powell used personal email on a limited basis to connect with people outside the department, and he worked with the State Department to secure the system. The report found Clinton did neither.</p>
<p>The report concluded Clinton’s use of a private server and account was not approved, and broke agency rules. The report said by the time she became secretary, the rules had repeatedly been updated, and were “considerably more detailed and more sophisticated.”</b><br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/31/former-state-dept-watchdog-debunks-central-clinton-email-claim.html?intcmp=hpcmt" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/31/former-state-dept-watchdog-debunks-central-clinton-email-claim.html?intcmp=hpcmt</a></p>
<p>Well, now we have heard from a GOP State Dept IG and a DEM State Dept IG...</p>
<p>Both saying the same things...</p>
<p>And ya'all maintain that THEY are BOTH wrong and Hillary is right..???   :D</p>
<p>The partisan bias is strong here...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76163</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 11:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76163</guid>
		<description>Jeezus, even DRUDGE is being a moron today..

&lt;B&gt;MURDERED GORILLA SEEN &#039;PROTECTING&#039; CHILD&lt;/B&gt;

&quot;Murder&quot; is a legal term that doesn&#039;t apply to animals..

In other words, an animal cannot be &quot;MURDERED&quot;....

THINK, PEOPLE!!!

A perfect example of hysterical emotionalism instead of cold hard objective facts...

Michale...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeezus, even DRUDGE is being a moron today..</p>
<p><b>MURDERED GORILLA SEEN 'PROTECTING' CHILD</b></p>
<p>"Murder" is a legal term that doesn't apply to animals..</p>
<p>In other words, an animal cannot be "MURDERED"....</p>
<p>THINK, PEOPLE!!!</p>
<p>A perfect example of hysterical emotionalism instead of cold hard objective facts...</p>
<p>Michale...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76162</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 09:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76162</guid>
		<description>As I said above, Independents are going to decide this election.  At 40% of the electorate, Independents/NPAs are going to have the final say...

Overwhelmingly (almost 70%) NPAs say that Hillary is &quot;untrustworthy&quot;....

It&#039;s also very telling that there was no official IG in the State Dept during Hillary&#039;s tenure there.   Clinton had maneuvered a family friend into a caretaker position as State Dept IG... Someone that Clinton could control...

No matter how ya&#039;all want to spin it, Hillary is in real trouble..

And that&#039;s WITHOUT the FBI recommendation that is due out any day now...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said above, Independents are going to decide this election.  At 40% of the electorate, Independents/NPAs are going to have the final say...</p>
<p>Overwhelmingly (almost 70%) NPAs say that Hillary is "untrustworthy"....</p>
<p>It's also very telling that there was no official IG in the State Dept during Hillary's tenure there.   Clinton had maneuvered a family friend into a caretaker position as State Dept IG... Someone that Clinton could control...</p>
<p>No matter how ya'all want to spin it, Hillary is in real trouble..</p>
<p>And that's WITHOUT the FBI recommendation that is due out any day now...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76161</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 09:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76161</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Hillary Clinton did not want her e-mails subjected to the Freedom of Information Act or subpoenas from Congress, and that’s why she set up a home-brew server. I think we all know that. People around her will tell you that in private if you really get them behind a closed door.  
I spoke to a number of top Democratic officials, and they’re terrified, including people at the White House, that her campaign is in freefall because of this distrust factor. And, indeed, Trump has a similar problem. But she’s the one whose numbers are going south.&lt;/B&gt;
-Carl Bernstein

Hillary lied about why she set up a private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server..

Hillary&#039;s judgement is questionable at best..

This disqualifies her for the office of POTUS...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Hillary Clinton did not want her e-mails subjected to the Freedom of Information Act or subpoenas from Congress, and that’s why she set up a home-brew server. I think we all know that. People around her will tell you that in private if you really get them behind a closed door.<br />
I spoke to a number of top Democratic officials, and they’re terrified, including people at the White House, that her campaign is in freefall because of this distrust factor. And, indeed, Trump has a similar problem. But she’s the one whose numbers are going south.</b><br />
-Carl Bernstein</p>
<p>Hillary lied about why she set up a private, insecure, home-brew, hackable, bathroom closet email server..</p>
<p>Hillary's judgement is questionable at best..</p>
<p>This disqualifies her for the office of POTUS...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76160</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 09:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76160</guid>
		<description>And MORE reason for Hillary (and ya&#039;all) to be worried..


&lt;B&gt;Hillary&#039;s ObamaCare problem

ObamaCare premiums are expected to rise more sharply than they have in previous years, and Republicans are seizing on the issue for electoral advantage.&lt;/B&gt;
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/281579-hillarys-obamacare-problem

Once again proving how Hillary is a completely flawed candidate.. 

Only Bernie has a chance of actually winning the White House for the Democrat Party.

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And MORE reason for Hillary (and ya'all) to be worried..</p>
<p><b>Hillary's ObamaCare problem</p>
<p>ObamaCare premiums are expected to rise more sharply than they have in previous years, and Republicans are seizing on the issue for electoral advantage.</b><br />
<a href="http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/281579-hillarys-obamacare-problem" rel="nofollow">http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/281579-hillarys-obamacare-problem</a></p>
<p>Once again proving how Hillary is a completely flawed candidate.. </p>
<p>Only Bernie has a chance of actually winning the White House for the Democrat Party.</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76159</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 08:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76159</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;politifact explicitly doesn&#039;t look at who made a factual statement when considering its degree truth, and probably read it rather than hearing it. if a statement is nitpicked, that&#039;s a function of the statement itself, not who said it. everybody&#039;s statements are nitpicked, that&#039;s what fact checkers do.&lt;/I&gt;

Prove it...  :D

Show me where Politifact nit-picked and equivocated with a DEM statement...

You can&#039;t because it doesn&#039;t happen..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>politifact explicitly doesn't look at who made a factual statement when considering its degree truth, and probably read it rather than hearing it. if a statement is nitpicked, that's a function of the statement itself, not who said it. everybody's statements are nitpicked, that's what fact checkers do.</i></p>
<p>Prove it...  :D</p>
<p>Show me where Politifact nit-picked and equivocated with a DEM statement...</p>
<p>You can't because it doesn't happen..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76158</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 08:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76158</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;but knowing that it was a lie and proving that it was a lie are two very different things.&lt;/I&gt;

And here we are back to the different standards for GOP and DEM...

We&#039;re NOT talking about COURT ROOM PROOF here...

If we KNOW it was a lie (which you just implied we do) then THAT is all that is required...

Please settle on a standard of proof and stick with it..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but knowing that it was a lie and proving that it was a lie are two very different things.</i></p>
<p>And here we are back to the different standards for GOP and DEM...</p>
<p>We're NOT talking about COURT ROOM PROOF here...</p>
<p>If we KNOW it was a lie (which you just implied we do) then THAT is all that is required...</p>
<p>Please settle on a standard of proof and stick with it..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76157</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 08:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76157</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;how could anyone possibly prove that factually false? it&#039;s a statement of preference, i.e. opinion. opinions, unlike facts, can&#039;t be proven true or false. &lt;/I&gt;

And yet, the statement, I WELCOME DEBATE ON THE DOMESTIC SURVEILLANCE ISSUE was CHRISWEIGANT.COM&#039;s &lt;B&gt;LIE OF THE YEAR&lt;/B&gt;

How do you explain that???  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>how could anyone possibly prove that factually false? it's a statement of preference, i.e. opinion. opinions, unlike facts, can't be proven true or false. </i></p>
<p>And yet, the statement, I WELCOME DEBATE ON THE DOMESTIC SURVEILLANCE ISSUE was CHRISWEIGANT.COM's <b>LIE OF THE YEAR</b></p>
<p>How do you explain that???  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76155</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 08:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76155</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But should the kid be allowed to be killed because their parents are morons???

no&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly...

The malfeasance of the parents have absolutely NOTHING to do with the question of whether or not the gorilla should have been taken down...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But should the kid be allowed to be killed because their parents are morons???</p>
<p>no</i></p>
<p>Exactly...</p>
<p>The malfeasance of the parents have absolutely NOTHING to do with the question of whether or not the gorilla should have been taken down...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76154</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 08:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76154</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;PETA is about as non-partisan as you are.&lt;/I&gt;

Despite all the facts to the contrary...  :D

I get it.. When PETA does something stoopid (which is a LOT), the Left Wingery wants to disavow all relationship...

But PETA is vastly predominantly Liberals and Liberals are vastly predominantly Democrats.... 

Ergo, PETA is vastly predominantly a Democrat organization...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>PETA is about as non-partisan as you are.</i></p>
<p>Despite all the facts to the contrary...  :D</p>
<p>I get it.. When PETA does something stoopid (which is a LOT), the Left Wingery wants to disavow all relationship...</p>
<p>But PETA is vastly predominantly Liberals and Liberals are vastly predominantly Democrats.... </p>
<p>Ergo, PETA is vastly predominantly a Democrat organization...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76145</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 23:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76145</guid>
		<description>@michale,

PETA is about as non-partisan as you are.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@michale,</p>
<p>PETA is about as non-partisan as you are.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76144</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 21:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76144</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But should the kid be allowed to be killed because their parents are morons???&lt;/I&gt;

no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But should the kid be allowed to be killed because their parents are morons???</i></p>
<p>no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76143</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 20:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76143</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;WORRIED:Clinton adds more campaign stops to avert a Sanders upset in California.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/30/clinton-adds-more-campaign-stops-to-avert-a-sanders-upset-in-california/

Clinton is worried..

Ya&#039;all should be too...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>WORRIED:Clinton adds more campaign stops to avert a Sanders upset in California.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/30/clinton-adds-more-campaign-stops-to-avert-a-sanders-upset-in-california/" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/30/clinton-adds-more-campaign-stops-to-avert-a-sanders-upset-in-california/</a></p>
<p>Clinton is worried..</p>
<p>Ya'all should be too...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76142</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76142</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Speaking of morons, where were this boy&#039;s parents or guardians?&lt;/I&gt;

No doubt that the parents have more than their share of culpability...

Moron status??  Maybe...

But should the kid be allowed to be killed because their parents are morons???


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Speaking of morons, where were this boy's parents or guardians?</i></p>
<p>No doubt that the parents have more than their share of culpability...</p>
<p>Moron status??  Maybe...</p>
<p>But should the kid be allowed to be killed because their parents are morons???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76141</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76141</guid>
		<description>Speaking of morons, where were this boy&#039;s parents or guardians?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of morons, where were this boy's parents or guardians?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76140</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76140</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3616453/New-video-footage-Harambe-shows-400-pound-gorilla-HOLDING-HANDS-four-year-old-boy-fell-zoo-enclosure-witnesses-say-animal-acting-protectively.html

Like I said... Democrats are morons....

Present company excluded, of course.. :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3616453/New-video-footage-Harambe-shows-400-pound-gorilla-HOLDING-HANDS-four-year-old-boy-fell-zoo-enclosure-witnesses-say-animal-acting-protectively.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3616453/New-video-footage-Harambe-shows-400-pound-gorilla-HOLDING-HANDS-four-year-old-boy-fell-zoo-enclosure-witnesses-say-animal-acting-protectively.html</a></p>
<p>Like I said... Democrats are morons....</p>
<p>Present company excluded, of course.. :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76139</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76139</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I would point you to your own proof on the matter. According to what you posted, they are mostly left leaning but some right with members belonging to Democrats, Greens, communists but also Fascists.&lt;/I&gt;

Like I said.. ALL Democrats..  :D

You can argue what the definition of &#039;is&#039; is until the cows come home..

But to argue that PETA is not predominantly a LEFT WING AKA DEMOCRAT organization....  Well, that&#039;s just fantasy...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I would point you to your own proof on the matter. According to what you posted, they are mostly left leaning but some right with members belonging to Democrats, Greens, communists but also Fascists.</i></p>
<p>Like I said.. ALL Democrats..  :D</p>
<p>You can argue what the definition of 'is' is until the cows come home..</p>
<p>But to argue that PETA is not predominantly a LEFT WING AKA DEMOCRAT organization....  Well, that's just fantasy...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76137</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76137</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The fact that PETA is predominantly a Democrat filled organization stands until you have ANY evidence to the contrary...&lt;/i&gt;

I would point you to your own proof on the matter. According to what you posted, they are mostly left leaning but some right with members belonging to Democrats, Greens, communists  but also Fascists. Looks like PETA does not belong to a particular party but is outside the party system. Now who here matches that description? And tried to hammer it home ad nauseam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fact that PETA is predominantly a Democrat filled organization stands until you have ANY evidence to the contrary...</i></p>
<p>I would point you to your own proof on the matter. According to what you posted, they are mostly left leaning but some right with members belonging to Democrats, Greens, communists  but also Fascists. Looks like PETA does not belong to a particular party but is outside the party system. Now who here matches that description? And tried to hammer it home ad nauseam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76136</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76136</guid>
		<description>What it all boils down to is this..

Anyone who doesn&#039;t think that Trump has a good chance to win..... ????

Well, just let me say that De Nile is NOT just a river in Egypt...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What it all boils down to is this..</p>
<p>Anyone who doesn't think that Trump has a good chance to win..... ????</p>
<p>Well, just let me say that De Nile is NOT just a river in Egypt...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76135</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76135</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Some of you say even if Hillary is better than Trump, you’re tired of choosing the “lesser of two evils,” and you’re going to vote your conscience by either writing Bernie’s name in, or voting for the Green Party candidate, or not voting at all.

I can’t criticize anyone for voting their conscience, of course. But your conscience should know that a decision not to vote for Hillary, should she become the Democratic nominee, is a de facto decision to help Donald Trump.&lt;/B&gt;

Hmmmmmmm  Who has articulated this concept before???   :D

Why, I think it was me!!!!  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Some of you say even if Hillary is better than Trump, you’re tired of choosing the “lesser of two evils,” and you’re going to vote your conscience by either writing Bernie’s name in, or voting for the Green Party candidate, or not voting at all.</p>
<p>I can’t criticize anyone for voting their conscience, of course. But your conscience should know that a decision not to vote for Hillary, should she become the Democratic nominee, is a de facto decision to help Donald Trump.</b></p>
<p>Hmmmmmmm  Who has articulated this concept before???   :D</p>
<p>Why, I think it was me!!!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76134</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76134</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Can Democrats Avoid the Circular Firing Squad?

A couple of months ago, it appeared that the Republican presidential field was a fragmented fratricidal mess, with party disarray and deadlock on display all the way to the Cleveland Convention. The Democrats, meanwhile, were on track to an early nomination and party unity.

Things didn’t quite work out that way. Hillary Clinton could still lock up the nomination by the last primaries on June 14, but not without relying on super-delegates. Here are the numbers:

Clinton has 1,769 pledged delegates won in caucuses and primaries, out of 2,310 delegates required for nomination. There are 913 yet to be awarded in the last round of primaries. To go over the top before the convention, not counting super-delegates, Clinton needs to win 541 more delegates, or well over half. But with Sanders surging nearly everywhere, that seems extremely unlikely.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/can-democrats-avoid-the-circular-firing-squad_b_10200286.html?

Hillary is toast...  :D 

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Can Democrats Avoid the Circular Firing Squad?</p>
<p>A couple of months ago, it appeared that the Republican presidential field was a fragmented fratricidal mess, with party disarray and deadlock on display all the way to the Cleveland Convention. The Democrats, meanwhile, were on track to an early nomination and party unity.</p>
<p>Things didn’t quite work out that way. Hillary Clinton could still lock up the nomination by the last primaries on June 14, but not without relying on super-delegates. Here are the numbers:</p>
<p>Clinton has 1,769 pledged delegates won in caucuses and primaries, out of 2,310 delegates required for nomination. There are 913 yet to be awarded in the last round of primaries. To go over the top before the convention, not counting super-delegates, Clinton needs to win 541 more delegates, or well over half. But with Sanders surging nearly everywhere, that seems extremely unlikely.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/can-democrats-avoid-the-circular-firing-squad_b_10200286.html?" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/can-democrats-avoid-the-circular-firing-squad_b_10200286.html?</a></p>
<p>Hillary is toast...  :D </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76133</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76133</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;1. Already decided for Hillary (CA, WA, NY, etc.)&lt;/I&gt;

And yet, Hillary is likely to lose California to Bernie...  And, with BERNIE OR BUST......

Don&#039;t count CA in Hillary&#039;s column just yet...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>1. Already decided for Hillary (CA, WA, NY, etc.)</i></p>
<p>And yet, Hillary is likely to lose California to Bernie...  And, with BERNIE OR BUST......</p>
<p>Don't count CA in Hillary's column just yet...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76132</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76132</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What&#039;s the point???

I thought I made it clear.&lt;/I&gt;

The point I THINK you were making is that Trump supporters ae bad because he can commit a murder on 5th Avenue and his supporters would still support him..

If that IS your point, then I could make the same point about Obama supporters and be just as accurate...

That&#039;s why I wondered if that was, indeed, your point..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What's the point???</p>
<p>I thought I made it clear.</i></p>
<p>The point I THINK you were making is that Trump supporters ae bad because he can commit a murder on 5th Avenue and his supporters would still support him..</p>
<p>If that IS your point, then I could make the same point about Obama supporters and be just as accurate...</p>
<p>That's why I wondered if that was, indeed, your point..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76131</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76131</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;He isn&#039;t playing, so he can&#039;t get tired.&lt;/I&gt;

THANK you....  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He isn't playing, so he can't get tired.</i></p>
<p>THANK you....  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76130</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76130</guid>
		<description>Ironically for Chris Christie, it will probably be New Jersey that puts Hillary over the top in delegates in the Democratic Race:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-will-likely-clinch-the-democratic-nomination-in-new-jersey/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically for Chris Christie, it will probably be New Jersey that puts Hillary over the top in delegates in the Democratic Race:</p>
<p><a href="http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-will-likely-clinch-the-democratic-nomination-in-new-jersey/" rel="nofollow">http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-will-likely-clinch-the-democratic-nomination-in-new-jersey/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76129</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76129</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Do ever get tired of playing the imbecile? &lt;/i&gt;

He isn&#039;t playing, so he can&#039;t get tired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do ever get tired of playing the imbecile? </i></p>
<p>He isn't playing, so he can't get tired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76128</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76128</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our candidates, especially in the GOP, are utterly disconnected from the will of the voting public for one painfully simple reason – voters do not matter very much in our political system. They never have. That’s not how our system was designed.&quot;

From: https://goplifer.com/2016/05/28/the-voter-participation-powerslide/

The 1% who influence the choices that the voters have are not the 1% in wealth terms, but the 1% who paid attention to, and participated in, local politics on a Thursday evening in January of 2013. And again the next week. They are the people who decide who we get to vote for.

The Democratic Party is basically a center-right party at the moment in Western democracy terms. This is because, using the same scale, the Republican Party is whack-a-doodle off the right of the scale.

It only makes sense that the Democratic Party inhabits the center where most of the votes are, and isn&#039;t on the left wing fringes with Bernie (there is a reason Bernie is an independent, and it isn&#039;t because he is staking out center territory between the Democrats and the Republicans. Hillary&#039;s campaign is a clear indication (she is beating Bernie by over 3 million votes) that she is appealing to this center.

If you want the Democratic Party to swerve to the left, read the article above and participate. You can do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Our candidates, especially in the GOP, are utterly disconnected from the will of the voting public for one painfully simple reason – voters do not matter very much in our political system. They never have. That’s not how our system was designed."</p>
<p>From: <a href="https://goplifer.com/2016/05/28/the-voter-participation-powerslide/" rel="nofollow">https://goplifer.com/2016/05/28/the-voter-participation-powerslide/</a></p>
<p>The 1% who influence the choices that the voters have are not the 1% in wealth terms, but the 1% who paid attention to, and participated in, local politics on a Thursday evening in January of 2013. And again the next week. They are the people who decide who we get to vote for.</p>
<p>The Democratic Party is basically a center-right party at the moment in Western democracy terms. This is because, using the same scale, the Republican Party is whack-a-doodle off the right of the scale.</p>
<p>It only makes sense that the Democratic Party inhabits the center where most of the votes are, and isn't on the left wing fringes with Bernie (there is a reason Bernie is an independent, and it isn't because he is staking out center territory between the Democrats and the Republicans. Hillary's campaign is a clear indication (she is beating Bernie by over 3 million votes) that she is appealing to this center.</p>
<p>If you want the Democratic Party to swerve to the left, read the article above and participate. You can do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76127</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76127</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;That&#039;s the logic that escapes me...

That people actually WANT Hillary even though she represents EVERYTHING they claim to hate...&lt;/I&gt;

So, either those people actually LIKE those things...

Or they feel that WINNING is more important than those things...

Either way, it doesn&#039;t say much for the principles of those people...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That's the logic that escapes me...</p>
<p>That people actually WANT Hillary even though she represents EVERYTHING they claim to hate...</i></p>
<p>So, either those people actually LIKE those things...</p>
<p>Or they feel that WINNING is more important than those things...</p>
<p>Either way, it doesn't say much for the principles of those people...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76126</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76126</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Do ever get tired of playing the imbecile? Ask yahoo, really? And I thought proof by google search page was bad. You have out done your self...&lt;/I&gt;

Do you have ANY evidence that PETA is NOT primarily made up of Democrats??

No??  

Didn&#039;t think so..

The fact that PETA is predominantly a Democrat filled organization stands until you have ANY evidence to the contrary...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do ever get tired of playing the imbecile? Ask yahoo, really? And I thought proof by google search page was bad. You have out done your self...</i></p>
<p>Do you have ANY evidence that PETA is NOT primarily made up of Democrats??</p>
<p>No??  </p>
<p>Didn't think so..</p>
<p>The fact that PETA is predominantly a Democrat filled organization stands until you have ANY evidence to the contrary...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76125</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76125</guid>
		<description>Don:

You can vote any way you want, but all states will fall into one of the following three categories:

1. Already decided for Hillary (CA, WA, NY, etc.)
2. Already decided for Trump (TX, MS, AL, etc.)
3. In play for either Hillary or Trump (FL, OH, etc.)

If you want to change the situation, you as an individual may be far more powerful than you think, but it doesn&#039;t involve voting for somebody who, in a first-past-the-post two horse race basically doesn&#039;t count (sad, but true).

Read this: https://goplifer.com/2016/05/28/the-voter-participation-powerslide/

You will see that the choices we have for president on the Republican side, with the exception a wildcard like Trump, are built from the bottom up.

You can spend the time and effort and be one of the people who takes the Democratic Party to crazy land, just like the Republican party has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don:</p>
<p>You can vote any way you want, but all states will fall into one of the following three categories:</p>
<p>1. Already decided for Hillary (CA, WA, NY, etc.)<br />
2. Already decided for Trump (TX, MS, AL, etc.)<br />
3. In play for either Hillary or Trump (FL, OH, etc.)</p>
<p>If you want to change the situation, you as an individual may be far more powerful than you think, but it doesn't involve voting for somebody who, in a first-past-the-post two horse race basically doesn't count (sad, but true).</p>
<p>Read this: <a href="https://goplifer.com/2016/05/28/the-voter-participation-powerslide/" rel="nofollow">https://goplifer.com/2016/05/28/the-voter-participation-powerslide/</a></p>
<p>You will see that the choices we have for president on the Republican side, with the exception a wildcard like Trump, are built from the bottom up.</p>
<p>You can spend the time and effort and be one of the people who takes the Democratic Party to crazy land, just like the Republican party has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76124</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76124</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Do you ever get tired of being wrong???&lt;/i&gt;

Do ever get tired of playing the imbecile? Ask yahoo, really? And I thought proof by google search page was bad. You have out done your self...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do you ever get tired of being wrong???</i></p>
<p>Do ever get tired of playing the imbecile? Ask yahoo, really? And I thought proof by google search page was bad. You have out done your self...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76123</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76123</guid>
		<description>And if you want some more Math:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/

#BoredWithBernie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you want some more Math:</p>
<p><a href="http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/" rel="nofollow">http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/</a></p>
<p>#BoredWithBernie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76122</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76122</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; Unless the effective you are looking for is more of the same shilling for the corporate interests that Hillary serves.
The bill from Hillary will be paid by average citizens while the corporate interests collect the benefits. So go ahead and support her- if you&#039;re into that sort of thing.&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly...

Hillary epitomizes the status quo...

That&#039;s what cracks me up about Hillary supporters..

They complain about money in politics, they complain about the 1% getting richer, they complain about the middle class disappearing, they complain about war-mongering....

They complain about ALL of that and so much more....

Yet they are supporting the candidate who EPITOMIZES ALL of that and who guarantees not only that it will continue, but will actually GROW..

That&#039;s the logic that escapes me...

That people actually WANT Hillary even though she represents EVERYTHING they claim to hate...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Unless the effective you are looking for is more of the same shilling for the corporate interests that Hillary serves.<br />
The bill from Hillary will be paid by average citizens while the corporate interests collect the benefits. So go ahead and support her- if you're into that sort of thing.</i></p>
<p>Exactly...</p>
<p>Hillary epitomizes the status quo...</p>
<p>That's what cracks me up about Hillary supporters..</p>
<p>They complain about money in politics, they complain about the 1% getting richer, they complain about the middle class disappearing, they complain about war-mongering....</p>
<p>They complain about ALL of that and so much more....</p>
<p>Yet they are supporting the candidate who EPITOMIZES ALL of that and who guarantees not only that it will continue, but will actually GROW..</p>
<p>That's the logic that escapes me...</p>
<p>That people actually WANT Hillary even though she represents EVERYTHING they claim to hate...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76121</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76121</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What&#039;s the point???&lt;/I&gt;

I thought I made it clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What's the point???</i></p>
<p>I thought I made it clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76119</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76119</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Takes one to know one if you are going to try and pin PETA on the democratic party...&lt;/I&gt;


&lt;B&gt;Is PETA predominantly Democratic or Republican?

Best Answer:  Democrat. Thinking that the well being of animals and the environment is more important than the well being of humans is a predominately Democratic viewpoint.

They are not democratic at all. They are fascist. 

PETA is a far left socialist group. Their ideals of using violence to control the behavior of private citizens is unamerican and consistent with democrat far left activism. 

Ask most PETA members who they associate with as a party and they will say democrat, or green, or communist. 
&lt;/B&gt;
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080209083911AAoIT3M

Do you ever get tired of being wrong???

Nit pick away...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Takes one to know one if you are going to try and pin PETA on the democratic party...</i></p>
<p><b>Is PETA predominantly Democratic or Republican?</p>
<p>Best Answer:  Democrat. Thinking that the well being of animals and the environment is more important than the well being of humans is a predominately Democratic viewpoint.</p>
<p>They are not democratic at all. They are fascist. </p>
<p>PETA is a far left socialist group. Their ideals of using violence to control the behavior of private citizens is unamerican and consistent with democrat far left activism. </p>
<p>Ask most PETA members who they associate with as a party and they will say democrat, or green, or communist.<br />
</b><br />
<a href="https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080209083911AAoIT3M" rel="nofollow">https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080209083911AAoIT3M</a></p>
<p>Do you ever get tired of being wrong???</p>
<p>Nit pick away...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76118</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76118</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Trump calls a spade a spade...&lt;/i&gt;

Hillary would call it a &quot;garden implement for inverting earth&quot; ;)

Bernie would want to know if it was a 1% Shovel so he could blame it for the demise of farmyard horses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump calls a spade a spade...</i></p>
<p>Hillary would call it a "garden implement for inverting earth" ;)</p>
<p>Bernie would want to know if it was a 1% Shovel so he could blame it for the demise of farmyard horses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76117</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76117</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Hillary is a pragmatic policy wonk - boring I know (she doesn&#039;t insult everybody like Trump or play Santa like Bernie), but boring and effective is what I want.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea??

Let&#039;s ask Tyrone Woods, Glen Dourhety, Sean Smith or Chris Stevens how &quot;effective&quot; Hillary is..

Oh wait.. We can&#039;t.. Their all dead..  Killed by Hillary&#039;s &quot;effective&quot;ness... 

How are things in Libya???

How are things in Syria???

How are things with Russia???

About the ONLY thing that Hillary is &quot;effective&quot; at is dodging sniper fire in Bosnia... 

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hillary is a pragmatic policy wonk - boring I know (she doesn't insult everybody like Trump or play Santa like Bernie), but boring and effective is what I want.</i></p>
<p>Yea??</p>
<p>Let's ask Tyrone Woods, Glen Dourhety, Sean Smith or Chris Stevens how "effective" Hillary is..</p>
<p>Oh wait.. We can't.. Their all dead..  Killed by Hillary's "effective"ness... </p>
<p>How are things in Libya???</p>
<p>How are things in Syria???</p>
<p>How are things with Russia???</p>
<p>About the ONLY thing that Hillary is "effective" at is dodging sniper fire in Bosnia... </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76116</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76116</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So if you support Hillary because you really support Hillary, by all means support her. But if you support Hillary because you are afraid of Trump, don&#039;t try to pass yourself off as the grown up.&lt;/i&gt;

I support Hillary because she is the only one with viable policies.  Bernie&#039;s read like a happy list of things a kid would buy if he got a hold of daddy&#039;s credit card but didn&#039;t understand that there is a monthly bill attached to it.

Trump is a moron whose only schtick is middle-school-level insults.

Hillary is a pragmatic policy wonk - boring I know (she doesn&#039;t insult everybody like Trump or play Santa like Bernie), but boring and effective is what I want. Entertainment is for the Opera House or the Symphony Hall ... or TV if you are into that sort of thing ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So if you support Hillary because you really support Hillary, by all means support her. But if you support Hillary because you are afraid of Trump, don't try to pass yourself off as the grown up.</i></p>
<p>I support Hillary because she is the only one with viable policies.  Bernie's read like a happy list of things a kid would buy if he got a hold of daddy's credit card but didn't understand that there is a monthly bill attached to it.</p>
<p>Trump is a moron whose only schtick is middle-school-level insults.</p>
<p>Hillary is a pragmatic policy wonk - boring I know (she doesn't insult everybody like Trump or play Santa like Bernie), but boring and effective is what I want. Entertainment is for the Opera House or the Symphony Hall ... or TV if you are into that sort of thing ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76115</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76115</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Yea, just as you called BS on my political agnosticity... And I proved you wrong there...

Did you?&lt;/I&gt;

Yes, I did..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yea, just as you called BS on my political agnosticity... And I proved you wrong there...</p>
<p>Did you?</i></p>
<p>Yes, I did..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76114</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76114</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;... and, to continue your thought, Bashi ... it doesn&#039;t seem to matter with the people who are inclined to support him.&lt;/I&gt;

As it was with Obama..

What&#039;s the point???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>... and, to continue your thought, Bashi ... it doesn't seem to matter with the people who are inclined to support him.</i></p>
<p>As it was with Obama..</p>
<p>What's the point???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76113</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76113</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Really, Michale? Does the truth hurt that much or are you just becoming a tad hypersensitive? Say it ain&#039;t so!&lt;/I&gt;

*I* am not hurt by it at all..

But Neil sure took a shot..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Really, Michale? Does the truth hurt that much or are you just becoming a tad hypersensitive? Say it ain't so!</i></p>
<p>*I* am not hurt by it at all..</p>
<p>But Neil sure took a shot..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76112</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76112</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The &quot;math&quot; you want Bernie supporters to acknowledge is fuzzy math. Neither Bernie or Hillary will get enough elected delegates secure the nomination in the primaries. The superdelegates will decide the nomination.&lt;/i&gt;

It isn&#039;t anything like as simple as that, so the math does work.

Let&#039;s say that there are no superdelegates:

Hillary: 1769
Bernie: 1499
Outstanding: 783

Total: 4051
Needed to win: 2026

% Hillary needs to win: 33%
% Bernie needs to win: 67% &lt;--- Math

With superdelegates:

Hillary: 2310
Bernie: 1542
Outstanding: 913

Total: 4765
Needed to win: 2383

% Hillary needs to win: 8%
% Bernie needs to win: 92% &lt;--- Even worse Math (for Bernie)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The "math" you want Bernie supporters to acknowledge is fuzzy math. Neither Bernie or Hillary will get enough elected delegates secure the nomination in the primaries. The superdelegates will decide the nomination.</i></p>
<p>It isn't anything like as simple as that, so the math does work.</p>
<p>Let's say that there are no superdelegates:</p>
<p>Hillary: 1769<br />
Bernie: 1499<br />
Outstanding: 783</p>
<p>Total: 4051<br />
Needed to win: 2026</p>
<p>% Hillary needs to win: 33%<br />
% Bernie needs to win: 67% &lt;--- Math</p>
<p>With superdelegates:</p>
<p>Hillary: 2310<br />
Bernie: 1542<br />
Outstanding: 913</p>
<p>Total: 4765<br />
Needed to win: 2383</p>
<p>% Hillary needs to win: 8%<br />
% Bernie needs to win: 92% &lt;--- Even worse Math (for Bernie)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76111</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 14:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76111</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Ouch...&lt;/I&gt;

Really, Michale? Does the truth hurt that much or are you just becoming a tad hypersensitive? Say it ain&#039;t so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ouch...</i></p>
<p>Really, Michale? Does the truth hurt that much or are you just becoming a tad hypersensitive? Say it ain't so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76110</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 14:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76110</guid>
		<description>Don[146]

Just wanted to say that I really enjoyed reading that!

A breath of fresh air, as they say ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don[146]</p>
<p>Just wanted to say that I really enjoyed reading that!</p>
<p>A breath of fresh air, as they say ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76109</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 14:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76109</guid>
		<description>... and, to continue your thought, Bashi ... it doesn&#039;t seem to matter with the people who are inclined to support him.

So, why bother wasting any breath over it anymore. I say focus on the issues and let the chips fall where they may.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... and, to continue your thought, Bashi ... it doesn't seem to matter with the people who are inclined to support him.</p>
<p>So, why bother wasting any breath over it anymore. I say focus on the issues and let the chips fall where they may.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76108</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76108</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Trump calls a spade a spade...&lt;/i&gt;

Then he backs it up a bit in the evening and calls a spade some sort of shovel. By morning he has tweeted that a spade is really a rake...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump calls a spade a spade...</i></p>
<p>Then he backs it up a bit in the evening and calls a spade some sort of shovel. By morning he has tweeted that a spade is really a rake...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76107</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76107</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Yea, just as you called BS on my political agnosticity... And I proved you wrong there...&lt;/i&gt;

Did you? Who is the more independent thinker, the one who takes any old quote and allegation about it as gospel if it fits there political bias or one who tracts down the original source to see if the allegations are true?

&lt;i&gt;Jeeze, where does the Democrat Party FIND these imbeciles??? :^/&lt;/i&gt;

Takes one to know one if you are going to try and pin PETA on the democratic party...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yea, just as you called BS on my political agnosticity... And I proved you wrong there...</i></p>
<p>Did you? Who is the more independent thinker, the one who takes any old quote and allegation about it as gospel if it fits there political bias or one who tracts down the original source to see if the allegations are true?</p>
<p><i>Jeeze, where does the Democrat Party FIND these imbeciles??? :^/</i></p>
<p>Takes one to know one if you are going to try and pin PETA on the democratic party...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76106</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 13:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76106</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The &quot;math&quot; you want Bernie supporters to acknowledge is fuzzy math. Neither Bernie or Hillary will get enough elected delegates secure the nomination in the primaries. The superdelegates will decide the nomination.&lt;/I&gt;

In other words, it&#039;s the DEMOCRATS who are going to have a contested convention..  :D

Ya just GOTS to love the irony, eh??  :D

&lt;I&gt;So if you support Hillary because you really support Hillary, by all means support her. But if you support Hillary because you are afraid of Trump, don&#039;t try to pass yourself off as the grown up&lt;/I&gt;

Ouch...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;And the ref takes a point away!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Jim Carrey, LIAR LIAR

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The "math" you want Bernie supporters to acknowledge is fuzzy math. Neither Bernie or Hillary will get enough elected delegates secure the nomination in the primaries. The superdelegates will decide the nomination.</i></p>
<p>In other words, it's the DEMOCRATS who are going to have a contested convention..  :D</p>
<p>Ya just GOTS to love the irony, eh??  :D</p>
<p><i>So if you support Hillary because you really support Hillary, by all means support her. But if you support Hillary because you are afraid of Trump, don't try to pass yourself off as the grown up</i></p>
<p>Ouch...</p>
<p><b>"And the ref takes a point away!!"</b><br />
-Jim Carrey, LIAR LIAR</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76104</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 13:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76104</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;When a GOP&#039;er does it, it&#039;s &quot;LYING&quot;...

When a Democrat does it, it&#039;s &quot;misleading inferences&quot;...&lt;/I&gt;

And this is why Trump is so popular and will win the election..

The vast majority of Americans are sick and tired of political correctness..

Trump calls a spade a spade...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When a GOP'er does it, it's "LYING"...</p>
<p>When a Democrat does it, it's "misleading inferences"...</i></p>
<p>And this is why Trump is so popular and will win the election..</p>
<p>The vast majority of Americans are sick and tired of political correctness..</p>
<p>Trump calls a spade a spade...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76103</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 12:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76103</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Read the statement more carefully. It IMPLIES things that are untrue, but doesn&#039;t explicitly lie. &lt;/I&gt;

How does it imply???

Let&#039;s see if we can agree on what was actually said..

Hillary has stated over and over again that she had permission and authorization to use her insecure, hackable, home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...

Do we agree on this??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Read the statement more carefully. It IMPLIES things that are untrue, but doesn't explicitly lie. </i></p>
<p>How does it imply???</p>
<p>Let's see if we can agree on what was actually said..</p>
<p>Hillary has stated over and over again that she had permission and authorization to use her insecure, hackable, home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...</p>
<p>Do we agree on this??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76102</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The aggressive driving unit of the Palm Beach County police department in Florida ticketed a woman for going 51 mph in a 20 mph school zone. But when the officer pulled her over for allegedly speeding she tried to get out of the ticket and shockingly told the cops, &quot;This is why you people get shot.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Must be a Hillary voter...  :^/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The aggressive driving unit of the Palm Beach County police department in Florida ticketed a woman for going 51 mph in a 20 mph school zone. But when the officer pulled her over for allegedly speeding she tried to get out of the ticket and shockingly told the cops, "This is why you people get shot."</b></p>
<p>Must be a Hillary voter...  :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76101</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 12:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76101</guid>
		<description>Read the statement more carefully.  It IMPLIES things that are untrue, but doesn&#039;t explicitly lie. It&#039;s sort of the opposite of Cruz&#039;s statement; he was wrong on all the details but at the heart of it was a true fact. Clinton&#039;s statement on her emails was technically accurate but left a misleading impression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the statement more carefully.  It IMPLIES things that are untrue, but doesn't explicitly lie. It's sort of the opposite of Cruz's statement; he was wrong on all the details but at the heart of it was a true fact. Clinton's statement on her emails was technically accurate but left a misleading impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76100</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 12:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76100</guid>
		<description>And Happy Memorial Day to you as well... :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Happy Memorial Day to you as well... :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76099</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 12:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76099</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m on a school trip today, &lt;/I&gt;

Lucky you... Schools out here in these parts...

&lt;I&gt;so expect long delays between replies. Happy Memorial day.&lt;/I&gt;

No worries.. I&#039;ll be here all day..  :D

I have no life..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'm on a school trip today, </i></p>
<p>Lucky you... Schools out here in these parts...</p>
<p><i>so expect long delays between replies. Happy Memorial day.</i></p>
<p>No worries.. I'll be here all day..  :D</p>
<p>I have no life..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76098</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76098</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Again, technically not a lie. More like a loophole.&lt;/I&gt;

How do you figure??

Hillary claimed she had authorization and permission to run her insecure, hackable, home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...

The State IG report stated she DIDN&#039;T have permission or authorization..  The FAM forbade it..

So, how is that technically the truth???  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Again, technically not a lie. More like a loophole.</i></p>
<p>How do you figure??</p>
<p>Hillary claimed she had authorization and permission to run her insecure, hackable, home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...</p>
<p>The State IG report stated she DIDN'T have permission or authorization..  The FAM forbade it..</p>
<p>So, how is that technically the truth???  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76097</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76097</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on a school trip today,  so expect long delays between replies. Happy Memorial day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm on a school trip today,  so expect long delays between replies. Happy Memorial day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76096</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76096</guid>
		<description>What ya&#039;all don&#039;t seem to understand is that Trump is running an INDEPENDENT campaign with a stolen GOP Banner...

And THAT is why ya&#039;all should be quaking in yer boots in fear...

A General Election is a three part election..

REPUBLICANS...  30%

DEMOCRATS....   30%

INDEPENDENTS... 40%

Trump has locked up the Republicans AND the Independents....

He can&#039;t lose....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ya'all don't seem to understand is that Trump is running an INDEPENDENT campaign with a stolen GOP Banner...</p>
<p>And THAT is why ya'all should be quaking in yer boots in fear...</p>
<p>A General Election is a three part election..</p>
<p>REPUBLICANS...  30%</p>
<p>DEMOCRATS....   30%</p>
<p>INDEPENDENTS... 40%</p>
<p>Trump has locked up the Republicans AND the Independents....</p>
<p>He can't lose....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76095</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76095</guid>
		<description>Again,  technically not a lie. More like a loophole. And yes,  the ability to mislead without technically lying is very important in politics, doubly so in diplomacy. One of many reasons why a good politician who is also a good person is rare as unicorns. Gandhi and Mandela are the only two i can think of for sure. For the u.s. i think Lincoln and MAYBE Ike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again,  technically not a lie. More like a loophole. And yes,  the ability to mislead without technically lying is very important in politics, doubly so in diplomacy. One of many reasons why a good politician who is also a good person is rare as unicorns. Gandhi and Mandela are the only two i can think of for sure. For the u.s. i think Lincoln and MAYBE Ike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76093</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76093</guid>
		<description>Thus endith this edition of MMMMR...  :D

We&#039;ll be back next week.. 

Same bat time  Same bat channel...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;And I&#039;m spent..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Austin Powers

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thus endith this edition of MMMMR...  :D</p>
<p>We'll be back next week.. </p>
<p>Same bat time  Same bat channel...</p>
<p><b>"And I'm spent.."</b><br />
-Austin Powers</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76092</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76092</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;But Jamieson, who founded FactCheck.org to help hold politicians to account, is scathing of the tactics adopted by team Clinton over the emails, which she believes distorts the degree to which the rules have changed since previous secretaries of state were in office. “[Clinton] is making the best she can of it, but she is doing it by misrepresenting the facts. It would be smarter not to offer misleading inferences,” she says.&lt;/I&gt;

Ya see???

When a GOP&#039;er does it, it&#039;s &quot;LYING&quot;...

When a Democrat does it, it&#039;s &quot;misleading inferences&quot;...

Again, to paraphrase Darth Vader..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;The hysterical partisan bias is strong with this one&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>But Jamieson, who founded FactCheck.org to help hold politicians to account, is scathing of the tactics adopted by team Clinton over the emails, which she believes distorts the degree to which the rules have changed since previous secretaries of state were in office. “[Clinton] is making the best she can of it, but she is doing it by misrepresenting the facts. It would be smarter not to offer misleading inferences,” she says.</p>
<p>Ya see???</p>
<p>When a GOP'er does it, it's "LYING"...</p>
<p>When a Democrat does it, it's "misleading inferences"...</p>
<p>Again, to paraphrase Darth Vader..</p>
<p></b><b>"The hysterical partisan bias is strong with this one"</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76091</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76091</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Another surprise blow to team Clinton last week was new opinion polling in California, where the penultimate and largest Democratic primary takes place on 7 June. It shows Sanders virtually neck and neck among voters and has forced Clinton to schedule extra appearances to try to avoid the humiliating prospect of winning the national nomination race on the same day as she loses the largest state.

To make matters worse, Sanders responded to Clinton’s decision to pull out of a scheduled televised debate by taking up a (since also rescinded) offer to face Donald Trump instead. Though establishment Democrats fume at the disloyalty of such a stunt, few doubt it would draw giant audiences. &lt;/B&gt;

I really think Trump made a mistake in wimping out of that debate...  He REALLY could have made some huge splinters in the Democrat side of the race..  Especially if he tanked the debate and made Sanders the clear winner...

That would have REALLY fouled up the Democrat Party... :D

As I see it, there are only 2 possibilities..

1.  By doing the debate, something much much worse could have happened that negated any benefit..

or

B.  Trump IS going to debate and is just waiting til it&#039;s closer to 7 Jun..

&lt;B&gt;The following takes place on the day of the California Presidential Primary&lt;/B&gt;

:D

I am betting on number B....  :D

&lt;B&gt;Somewhat less attention was drawn to the final shock news last week: a federal investigation into campaign contributions to long-time Clinton confidant and the governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe. With the FBI now investigating both the candidate and an elected official with perhaps the closest ties to her family, Trump may yet have more ammunition for his “crooked Clinton” taunts than even he expected.&lt;/B&gt;

Clinton Corrupts And Absolute Clinton Corrupts Absolutely...

Yea, it fits....

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Another surprise blow to team Clinton last week was new opinion polling in California, where the penultimate and largest Democratic primary takes place on 7 June. It shows Sanders virtually neck and neck among voters and has forced Clinton to schedule extra appearances to try to avoid the humiliating prospect of winning the national nomination race on the same day as she loses the largest state.</p>
<p>To make matters worse, Sanders responded to Clinton’s decision to pull out of a scheduled televised debate by taking up a (since also rescinded) offer to face Donald Trump instead. Though establishment Democrats fume at the disloyalty of such a stunt, few doubt it would draw giant audiences. </b></p>
<p>I really think Trump made a mistake in wimping out of that debate...  He REALLY could have made some huge splinters in the Democrat side of the race..  Especially if he tanked the debate and made Sanders the clear winner...</p>
<p>That would have REALLY fouled up the Democrat Party... :D</p>
<p>As I see it, there are only 2 possibilities..</p>
<p>1.  By doing the debate, something much much worse could have happened that negated any benefit..</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>B.  Trump IS going to debate and is just waiting til it's closer to 7 Jun..</p>
<p><b>The following takes place on the day of the California Presidential Primary</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>I am betting on number B....  :D</p>
<p><b>Somewhat less attention was drawn to the final shock news last week: a federal investigation into campaign contributions to long-time Clinton confidant and the governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe. With the FBI now investigating both the candidate and an elected official with perhaps the closest ties to her family, Trump may yet have more ammunition for his “crooked Clinton” taunts than even he expected.</b></p>
<p>Clinton Corrupts And Absolute Clinton Corrupts Absolutely...</p>
<p>Yea, it fits....</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76090</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76090</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;hen came a damning report by an independent inspector at the Department of State, who contradicted her claims that she had been allowed to use a private email server for official business while serving as the nation’s chief diplomat. &lt;/B&gt;

JL, correct me if I am wrong, but I don&#039;t think you ever addressed Clinton&#039;s lie about having permission and authorization to run her insecure, hackable, home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>hen came a damning report by an independent inspector at the Department of State, who contradicted her claims that she had been allowed to use a private email server for official business while serving as the nation’s chief diplomat. </b></p>
<p>JL, correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you ever addressed Clinton's lie about having permission and authorization to run her insecure, hackable, home-brewed, bathroom closet email server...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76089</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76089</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Poor polls, scandal, a cussed rival … how it’s all going wrong for Hillary Clinton
She was expected to be the clear frontrunner for the presidency. But after a terrible week, Hillary Clinton is still trading blows with Bernie Sanders as the Donald Trump menace grows.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/28/hillary-clinton-us-presidential-electiond-democrats

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Poor polls, scandal, a cussed rival … how it’s all going wrong for Hillary Clinton<br />
She was expected to be the clear frontrunner for the presidency. But after a terrible week, Hillary Clinton is still trading blows with Bernie Sanders as the Donald Trump menace grows.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/28/hillary-clinton-us-presidential-electiond-democrats" rel="nofollow">http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/28/hillary-clinton-us-presidential-electiond-democrats</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76088</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76088</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton does have a clear path to win the election, I grant you that...

&lt;B&gt;How Hillary Loses
Donald Trump can actually win if Clinton makes these four mistakes. Spoiler alert: She’s already making all of them.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/2016-election-hillary-clinton-campaign-loses-defeated-donald-trump-213924#ixzz4A8bkN6Z2 

But she ALSO has a clear path to lose as well..

Free Trade is killing Hillary..  It&#039;s turning every Union voter into a Trump voter...

Hillary can&#039;t win without Independents and she can&#039;t win without the Unions..

Hillary&#039;s path to LUSER is a LOT clearer and a LOT easier than her path to a win..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton does have a clear path to win the election, I grant you that...</p>
<p><b>How Hillary Loses<br />
Donald Trump can actually win if Clinton makes these four mistakes. Spoiler alert: She’s already making all of them.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/2016-election-hillary-clinton-campaign-loses-defeated-donald-trump-213924#ixzz4A8bkN6Z2" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/2016-election-hillary-clinton-campaign-loses-defeated-donald-trump-213924#ixzz4A8bkN6Z2</a> </p>
<p>But she ALSO has a clear path to lose as well..</p>
<p>Free Trade is killing Hillary..  It's turning every Union voter into a Trump voter...</p>
<p>Hillary can't win without Independents and she can't win without the Unions..</p>
<p>Hillary's path to LUSER is a LOT clearer and a LOT easier than her path to a win..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76087</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76087</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Hillary Clinton Struggles to Find Footing in Unusual Race

For now, her aides appear to be throwing ideas against a wall to see what sticks, including trying out different monikers after the Democratic National Committee’s “Dangerous Donald” flopped. An internal favorite is “Poor Donald,” with its implication that Mr. Trump, famously defensive about his net worth, is not nearly as wealthy as he lets on.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html?_r=0

Hmmmmm So Klan Clinton is going with the derisive nickname idea..

Wherever could she have gotten such an idea!???  

Imitation IS the sincerest form of flattery...  :D

Klan Clinton can&#039;t come up with their own plans, so they adopt Trump&#039;s..  

No wonder Klan Hillary is foundering...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Hillary Clinton Struggles to Find Footing in Unusual Race</p>
<p>For now, her aides appear to be throwing ideas against a wall to see what sticks, including trying out different monikers after the Democratic National Committee’s “Dangerous Donald” flopped. An internal favorite is “Poor Donald,” with its implication that Mr. Trump, famously defensive about his net worth, is not nearly as wealthy as he lets on.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html?_r=0</a></p>
<p>Hmmmmm So Klan Clinton is going with the derisive nickname idea..</p>
<p>Wherever could she have gotten such an idea!???  </p>
<p>Imitation IS the sincerest form of flattery...  :D</p>
<p>Klan Clinton can't come up with their own plans, so they adopt Trump's..  </p>
<p>No wonder Klan Hillary is foundering...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76086</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76086</guid>
		<description>Part 3

http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_36/image.img.jpg/0/549/1448983874898.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part 3</p>
<p><a href="http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_36/image.img.jpg/0/549/1448983874898.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1" rel="nofollow">http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_36/image.img.jpg/0/549/1448983874898.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76085</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76085</guid>
		<description>Funny cuz it&#039;s true, Part 2

http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_52/image.img.jpg/0/549/1457978077582.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny cuz it's true, Part 2</p>
<p><a href="http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_52/image.img.jpg/0/549/1457978077582.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1" rel="nofollow">http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_52/image.img.jpg/0/549/1457978077582.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76084</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76084</guid>
		<description>http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_59/image.img.jpg/0/549/1463766770206.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1

heh

&lt;B&gt;&quot;It&#039;s funny cuz it&#039;s true&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Homer Simpson

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_59/image.img.jpg/0/549/1463766770206.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1" rel="nofollow">http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/opinion/slideshow/2015/02/18/foxnews-com-opinion-cartoons/_jcr_content/slideshow-par/slide_image_59/image.img.jpg/0/549/1463766770206.jpg?ve=1&amp;tl=1?ve=1</a></p>
<p>heh</p>
<p><b>"It's funny cuz it's true"</b><br />
-Homer Simpson</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76083</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 11:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76083</guid>
		<description>And in the Moronic Liberals department:

&lt;B&gt;Cincinnati Zoo&#039;s killing of gorilla to rescue 4-year-old boy sparks outrage&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/30/cincinnati-zoos-killing-gorilla-to-rescue-4-year-old-boy-sparks-outrage.html?intcmp=hphz10

Yea, let&#039;s let the big monkey kill a 4yr old kid...  :^/

One especially moronic moron said that the gorilla was &quot;murdered&quot;...  

Jeeze, where does the Democrat Party FIND these imbeciles???  :^/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in the Moronic Liberals department:</p>
<p><b>Cincinnati Zoo's killing of gorilla to rescue 4-year-old boy sparks outrage</b><br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/30/cincinnati-zoos-killing-gorilla-to-rescue-4-year-old-boy-sparks-outrage.html?intcmp=hphz10" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/30/cincinnati-zoos-killing-gorilla-to-rescue-4-year-old-boy-sparks-outrage.html?intcmp=hphz10</a></p>
<p>Yea, let's let the big monkey kill a 4yr old kid...  :^/</p>
<p>One especially moronic moron said that the gorilla was "murdered"...  </p>
<p>Jeeze, where does the Democrat Party FIND these imbeciles???  :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76082</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76082</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s time for Michale&#039;s Monday Morning Media Roundup....  :D


&lt;B&gt;Nancy Regg, a spokeswoman for Rolling Thunder, said the group had invited Mr. Trump to appear. The group did not extend an invitation to Hillary Clinton or Senator Bernie Sanders, she said.

Richard McFadden, 58, an annual Rolling Thunder attendee from North Carolina, said Mrs. Clinton would not have been welcome.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/30/us/politics/donald-trump-and-bikers-share-affection-at-rolling-thunder-rally.html?_r=0

Ya&#039;all just don&#039;t get it..  Patriotic Americans just don&#039;t like Hillary Clinton...

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it's time for Michale's Monday Morning Media Roundup....  :D</p>
<p><b>Nancy Regg, a spokeswoman for Rolling Thunder, said the group had invited Mr. Trump to appear. The group did not extend an invitation to Hillary Clinton or Senator Bernie Sanders, she said.</p>
<p>Richard McFadden, 58, an annual Rolling Thunder attendee from North Carolina, said Mrs. Clinton would not have been welcome.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/30/us/politics/donald-trump-and-bikers-share-affection-at-rolling-thunder-rally.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/30/us/politics/donald-trump-and-bikers-share-affection-at-rolling-thunder-rally.html?_r=0</a></p>
<p>Ya'all just don't get it..  Patriotic Americans just don't like Hillary Clinton...</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76081</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76081</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Trump probably thinks that everybody follows him on Twitter. Sadly a lot of his 8.2M followers probably fall into one of the following (sorry) groups:&lt;/I&gt;

WOW...  To paraphrase Darth Vader...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;The penis-envy is strong with this one..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

:D

Can&#039;t wait ta see how ya&#039;all react when Trump wins the election...  :D

I am actually kind of hoping that Director Comey DOESN&#039;T recommend that Hillary be indicted...

Because she will likely be forced from the race and Biden will replace her...

Biden actually has a better than even chance of beating Trump..

Hillary??  She is a guaranteed loser...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump probably thinks that everybody follows him on Twitter. Sadly a lot of his 8.2M followers probably fall into one of the following (sorry) groups:</i></p>
<p>WOW...  To paraphrase Darth Vader...</p>
<p><b>"The penis-envy is strong with this one.."</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Can't wait ta see how ya'all react when Trump wins the election...  :D</p>
<p>I am actually kind of hoping that Director Comey DOESN'T recommend that Hillary be indicted...</p>
<p>Because she will likely be forced from the race and Biden will replace her...</p>
<p>Biden actually has a better than even chance of beating Trump..</p>
<p>Hillary??  She is a guaranteed loser...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76080</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76080</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m going to call complete and utter bullshit on this one. You are parroting pure right wing bias and spin.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, just as you called BS on my political agnosticity... And I proved you wrong there...

So......  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'm going to call complete and utter bullshit on this one. You are parroting pure right wing bias and spin.</i></p>
<p>Yea, just as you called BS on my political agnosticity... And I proved you wrong there...</p>
<p>So......  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76079</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76079</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The fantasy world of the Republicans has been easily exposed by Politifact and other fact checking organizations.&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly!!

Politifact goes after Republicans and supports the Democrat agenda...

Which is what I have been saying...

Thank you, Neil...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fantasy world of the Republicans has been easily exposed by Politifact and other fact checking organizations.</i></p>
<p>Exactly!!</p>
<p>Politifact goes after Republicans and supports the Democrat agenda...</p>
<p>Which is what I have been saying...</p>
<p>Thank you, Neil...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76078</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76078</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;cruz was wrong on the details, but the general sentiment is accurate, and it&#039;s a valid concern.&lt;/I&gt;

And if a DEM would have said it, Politifact would have rated it &quot;MOSTLY TRUE&quot;...

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>cruz was wrong on the details, but the general sentiment is accurate, and it's a valid concern.</i></p>
<p>And if a DEM would have said it, Politifact would have rated it "MOSTLY TRUE"...</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76077</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76077</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Has anyone here ever, with great equivocation and mitigation, defended Bush when he was accused of lying about WMDS..

yes, me.

Has anyone here ever, with great equivocation and mitigation, defended ANY Republican when they are accused of lying...

yes, me.&lt;/I&gt;

Has anyone else???

NO...

&lt;I&gt;that&#039;s because she&#039;s better than they are at misleading without lying (i.e. being a politician).&lt;/I&gt;

Misleading without lying??  :D

Do you comprehend how utterly ridiculous that sounds??  :D

So, what you are saying is that her INTENT is to lie, but she does it in such a way as to be able to SPIN it that it&#039;s not really a lie.

And you think this is a GOOD quality in a person??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Has anyone here ever, with great equivocation and mitigation, defended Bush when he was accused of lying about WMDS..</p>
<p>yes, me.</p>
<p>Has anyone here ever, with great equivocation and mitigation, defended ANY Republican when they are accused of lying...</p>
<p>yes, me.</i></p>
<p>Has anyone else???</p>
<p>NO...</p>
<p><i>that's because she's better than they are at misleading without lying (i.e. being a politician).</i></p>
<p>Misleading without lying??  :D</p>
<p>Do you comprehend how utterly ridiculous that sounds??  :D</p>
<p>So, what you are saying is that her INTENT is to lie, but she does it in such a way as to be able to SPIN it that it's not really a lie.</p>
<p>And you think this is a GOOD quality in a person??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76076</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76076</guid>
		<description>the scariest thing about that quote to me is the kernel of truth behind it. iran&#039;s government really does celebrate the anniversary of the 1979 hostage taking, and really does stage rallies at which &quot;death to america&quot; is still recited by hard-liners as a traditional chant.

the claim was rated mostly false because it&#039;s not a national calendar holiday like thanksgiving or christmas, and because it&#039;s not actually called &quot;death to america day.&quot; but the fact that the hostage-taking and &quot;death to america&quot; chanting is still officially celebrated at all is a serious concern.

cruz was wrong on the details, but the general sentiment is accurate, and it&#039;s a valid concern.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the scariest thing about that quote to me is the kernel of truth behind it. iran's government really does celebrate the anniversary of the 1979 hostage taking, and really does stage rallies at which "death to america" is still recited by hard-liners as a traditional chant.</p>
<p>the claim was rated mostly false because it's not a national calendar holiday like thanksgiving or christmas, and because it's not actually called "death to america day." but the fact that the hostage-taking and "death to america" chanting is still officially celebrated at all is a serious concern.</p>
<p>cruz was wrong on the details, but the general sentiment is accurate, and it's a valid concern.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76074</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 04:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76074</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Fairly funny, but obviously a joke...&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m going to call complete and utter bullshit on this one. You are parroting pure right wing bias and spin. 

Here is the full quote for context:

&lt;b&gt;That was not the most notable part of that article. It got the most attention, but it wasn’t the most notable part. The most notable part of that article was it quoted the same senior White House advisor as gleefully stating that he believed that the White House had successfully delayed Israel from acting for so long that there was now nothing Israel could do to prevent Iran “from acquiring a nuclear weapons arsenal.” I believe fundamentally President Obama and his senior team does not understand the nature of the regime. I believe they think it is perfectly acceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons and engage in containment. And they don’t appreciate the radical religious zealotry. Here are a couple of just simple facts about the Iranian regime. Number one, the man who’s considered the father of the Iranian nuclear program, a man who’s no longer with us because he has since met his maker, and involuntarily, I might note, had written into his last will and testament that he wanted the following words printed on his gravestone. Here lies a man who sought to annihilate Israel. Think for a second about the hatred, the animosity that is seething through someone who writes a statement like that. Last year, Khamenei, in 2014, speaking to a large crowd in Tehran, said falsely, America is the greatest human rights abuser on the face of the planet. The crowd responded by chanting in unison death to America. And indeed, every day, or every year, rather, Iran celebrates as a holiday what they call death to America day. That’s an actual holiday in Iran. Here, we have Thanksgiving, we have Christmas, we have the 4th of July. Every year in Iran, they celebrate death to America day, which is the anniversary of Iran in the 1970s taking Americans hostage. There is a reason Iran calls Israel the little Satan and America the great Satan. And I believe neither President Obama nor his team understand that these are theocratic zealots whose religious extremism and radical Islamic theology makes the risk of their using a nuclear weapon to murder millions unacceptably high.&lt;/b&gt;

And for some real shits and giggles here is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hughhewitt.com/senator-ted-cruz-on-hillarys-homebrew-server-and-2016/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;full transcript&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hughhewitt.com/wp-content/uploads/03-11hhs-cruz.mp3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt;with audio&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;

Not even the slightest hint of humor unless you count mispronouncing Khamenei funny...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Fairly funny, but obviously a joke...</i></p>
<p>I'm going to call complete and utter bullshit on this one. You are parroting pure right wing bias and spin. </p>
<p>Here is the full quote for context:</p>
<p><b>That was not the most notable part of that article. It got the most attention, but it wasn’t the most notable part. The most notable part of that article was it quoted the same senior White House advisor as gleefully stating that he believed that the White House had successfully delayed Israel from acting for so long that there was now nothing Israel could do to prevent Iran “from acquiring a nuclear weapons arsenal.” I believe fundamentally President Obama and his senior team does not understand the nature of the regime. I believe they think it is perfectly acceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons and engage in containment. And they don’t appreciate the radical religious zealotry. Here are a couple of just simple facts about the Iranian regime. Number one, the man who’s considered the father of the Iranian nuclear program, a man who’s no longer with us because he has since met his maker, and involuntarily, I might note, had written into his last will and testament that he wanted the following words printed on his gravestone. Here lies a man who sought to annihilate Israel. Think for a second about the hatred, the animosity that is seething through someone who writes a statement like that. Last year, Khamenei, in 2014, speaking to a large crowd in Tehran, said falsely, America is the greatest human rights abuser on the face of the planet. The crowd responded by chanting in unison death to America. And indeed, every day, or every year, rather, Iran celebrates as a holiday what they call death to America day. That’s an actual holiday in Iran. Here, we have Thanksgiving, we have Christmas, we have the 4th of July. Every year in Iran, they celebrate death to America day, which is the anniversary of Iran in the 1970s taking Americans hostage. There is a reason Iran calls Israel the little Satan and America the great Satan. And I believe neither President Obama nor his team understand that these are theocratic zealots whose religious extremism and radical Islamic theology makes the risk of their using a nuclear weapon to murder millions unacceptably high.</b></p>
<p>And for some real shits and giggles here is the <a href="http://www.hughhewitt.com/senator-ted-cruz-on-hillarys-homebrew-server-and-2016/" rel="nofollow">full transcript</a>, <a href="http://www.hughhewitt.com/wp-content/uploads/03-11hhs-cruz.mp3" rel="nofollow"> <b>with audio</b>.</a></p>
<p>Not even the slightest hint of humor unless you count mispronouncing Khamenei funny...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76073</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 01:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76073</guid>
		<description>And, don&#039;t forget to check out the eaglets, Freedom and Liberty, in their idyllic DC nest, near the White House, as they get set to fledge, otherwise known as &#039;flyin&#039; the coop&#039;. Heh.

http://dceaglecam.eagles.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, don't forget to check out the eaglets, Freedom and Liberty, in their idyllic DC nest, near the White House, as they get set to fledge, otherwise known as 'flyin' the coop'. Heh.</p>
<p><a href="http://dceaglecam.eagles.org/" rel="nofollow">http://dceaglecam.eagles.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/27/ftp393/#comment-76072</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 01:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12281#comment-76072</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;SIGN A WHITE HOUSE PETITION FOR MEMORIAL DAY!&lt;/B&gt;

... to create a national day of celebration of America&#039;s living symbol of freedom, the bald eagle!

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/american-eagle-dayan-official-national-day-celebrate-our-living-symbol-freedomthe-bald-eagle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>SIGN A WHITE HOUSE PETITION FOR MEMORIAL DAY!</b></p>
<p>... to create a national day of celebration of America's living symbol of freedom, the bald eagle!</p>
<p><a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/american-eagle-dayan-official-national-day-celebrate-our-living-symbol-freedomthe-bald-eagle" rel="nofollow">https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/american-eagle-dayan-official-national-day-celebrate-our-living-symbol-freedomthe-bald-eagle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
