<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Update And Some Big Site News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 06:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75902</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75902</guid>
		<description>&quot;There was the usual front line reporting, complete with videos of artillery units and Iraqi army units firing at the enemy, and some discussion of strategies and tactics.&quot;

Compared to previous wars in the media age, there has been virtually no front line reporting by journalists.  What the public sees is basically &quot;stock footage.&quot;  There is virtually NO discussion of long term strategy or means to implement the strategy.  There have been a lot of retired Generals on camera, but none of this is official and almost all of it is vague.  Frankly, politicians, the military and nearly all the American Public seem delighted with this state of affairs.  

What does the end game look like? (End game is an arbitrary construct, but useful for planning purposes).  A unified Iraq of the Saddam Hussein Era with Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish regions under the control of a centralized government in Baghdad?  Something more federalized, or new boundaries and new nations? How does Syria fit in to the picture? Russia, Iran?  There are a lot of spheres of interest bumping together, and not happily.

It is good to see ISIS getting a thumping, but ISIS is really just old wine in a new bottle.  They didn&#039;t take Fallujah, they already there.  ISIS is militant Sunni mixed with the trappings of Wahhabism.  It&#039;s centuries old tribal conflict.  Like Northern Ireland.  The tribes and the tribalism won&#039;t go away, they just go to ground and wait for outsiders to leave or get complacent.

The British Empire was dealing with this problem prior to the First World War, during the First World War, and after First World War well into the &#039;50s when their Empire basically ceased be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"There was the usual front line reporting, complete with videos of artillery units and Iraqi army units firing at the enemy, and some discussion of strategies and tactics."</p>
<p>Compared to previous wars in the media age, there has been virtually no front line reporting by journalists.  What the public sees is basically "stock footage."  There is virtually NO discussion of long term strategy or means to implement the strategy.  There have been a lot of retired Generals on camera, but none of this is official and almost all of it is vague.  Frankly, politicians, the military and nearly all the American Public seem delighted with this state of affairs.  </p>
<p>What does the end game look like? (End game is an arbitrary construct, but useful for planning purposes).  A unified Iraq of the Saddam Hussein Era with Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish regions under the control of a centralized government in Baghdad?  Something more federalized, or new boundaries and new nations? How does Syria fit in to the picture? Russia, Iran?  There are a lot of spheres of interest bumping together, and not happily.</p>
<p>It is good to see ISIS getting a thumping, but ISIS is really just old wine in a new bottle.  They didn't take Fallujah, they already there.  ISIS is militant Sunni mixed with the trappings of Wahhabism.  It's centuries old tribal conflict.  Like Northern Ireland.  The tribes and the tribalism won't go away, they just go to ground and wait for outsiders to leave or get complacent.</p>
<p>The British Empire was dealing with this problem prior to the First World War, during the First World War, and after First World War well into the '50s when their Empire basically ceased be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75881</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 09:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75881</guid>
		<description>Remember when Clinton said that she used a private insecure homebrew bathroom closet email server &quot;for convenience&quot;..??

&lt;B&gt;“Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.”&lt;/B&gt;

Clinton lied..

She used it because, AS I SAID AT THE BEGINNING, she didn&#039;t want her emails accessible...

Clinton lied...

There is NO other conclusion possible..

And the media is ALL over this story...

Clinton lied...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when Clinton said that she used a private insecure homebrew bathroom closet email server "for convenience"..??</p>
<p><b>“Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.”</b></p>
<p>Clinton lied..</p>
<p>She used it because, AS I SAID AT THE BEGINNING, she didn't want her emails accessible...</p>
<p>Clinton lied...</p>
<p>There is NO other conclusion possible..</p>
<p>And the media is ALL over this story...</p>
<p>Clinton lied...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75838</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 15:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75838</guid>
		<description>https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/05/25/the-long-lines-at-airports-are-a-problem-for-hillary-clinton/

More problems for Hillary...

Every time something bad happens it&#039;s going to be Hillary who bears the brunt of the blame, not Trump..

Why??  Because Hillary is The Establishment Candidate and Trump is the outsider...

That means Hillary will take the blame for an Establishment who is more concerned about getting men into the women&#039;s bathroom then they are about making sure every American who flies can actually MAKE their flights...

Every misstep, every bonehead move, every dumshit step made by the Obama Administration will mean hundreds of votes for Trump and hundreds less votes for Hillary...

The Democrats&#039; Big Blue Wall can&#039;t save them from the curse of The Establishment...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/05/25/the-long-lines-at-airports-are-a-problem-for-hillary-clinton/" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/05/25/the-long-lines-at-airports-are-a-problem-for-hillary-clinton/</a></p>
<p>More problems for Hillary...</p>
<p>Every time something bad happens it's going to be Hillary who bears the brunt of the blame, not Trump..</p>
<p>Why??  Because Hillary is The Establishment Candidate and Trump is the outsider...</p>
<p>That means Hillary will take the blame for an Establishment who is more concerned about getting men into the women's bathroom then they are about making sure every American who flies can actually MAKE their flights...</p>
<p>Every misstep, every bonehead move, every dumshit step made by the Obama Administration will mean hundreds of votes for Trump and hundreds less votes for Hillary...</p>
<p>The Democrats' Big Blue Wall can't save them from the curse of The Establishment...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75821</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 14:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75821</guid>
		<description>Hillary lied..

It&#039;s THAT simple...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary lied..</p>
<p>It's THAT simple...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75815</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 13:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75815</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;HILLARY CLINTON’S use of a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 has been justifiably criticized as an error of judgment. What the new report from the State Department inspector general makes clear is that it also was not a casual oversight. Ms. Clinton had plenty of warnings to use official government communications methods, so as to make sure that her records were properly preserved and to minimize cybersecurity risks. She ignored them.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-inexcusable-willful-disregard-for-the-rules/2016/05/25/0089e942-22ae-11e6-9e7f-57890b612299_story.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>HILLARY CLINTON’S use of a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 has been justifiably criticized as an error of judgment. What the new report from the State Department inspector general makes clear is that it also was not a casual oversight. Ms. Clinton had plenty of warnings to use official government communications methods, so as to make sure that her records were properly preserved and to minimize cybersecurity risks. She ignored them.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-inexcusable-willful-disregard-for-the-rules/2016/05/25/0089e942-22ae-11e6-9e7f-57890b612299_story.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-inexcusable-willful-disregard-for-the-rules/2016/05/25/0089e942-22ae-11e6-9e7f-57890b612299_story.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75790</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 09:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75790</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Hillary is simply not qualified to be President, simply on the basis of her judgement alone..&lt;/I&gt;

Or, in Hillary&#039;s case, lack thereof...  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hillary is simply not qualified to be President, simply on the basis of her judgement alone..</i></p>
<p>Or, in Hillary's case, lack thereof...  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75788</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 09:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75788</guid>
		<description>Again, directly from the report...

&lt;B&gt;According to DS and IRM officials, Department employees must use agency-authorized information systems to conduct normal day-to-day operations because the use of non-Departmental systems creates significant security risks.&lt;/B&gt;

No matter HOW you want to spin it, this OIG report is HUGELY damaging to Hillary Clinton&#039;s candidacy..

Even if one goes with the milquetoast spin that all it showed was &quot;bad judgement&quot;, such &quot;bad judgement&quot; in a PRESIDENTIAL position would likely cause GREAT damage to this country...

Hillary is simply not qualified to be President, simply on the basis of her judgement alone..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, directly from the report...</p>
<p><b>According to DS and IRM officials, Department employees must use agency-authorized information systems to conduct normal day-to-day operations because the use of non-Departmental systems creates significant security risks.</b></p>
<p>No matter HOW you want to spin it, this OIG report is HUGELY damaging to Hillary Clinton's candidacy..</p>
<p>Even if one goes with the milquetoast spin that all it showed was "bad judgement", such "bad judgement" in a PRESIDENTIAL position would likely cause GREAT damage to this country...</p>
<p>Hillary is simply not qualified to be President, simply on the basis of her judgement alone..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75787</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 09:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75787</guid>
		<description>From the report:

&lt;B&gt;Throughout Secretary Clinton’s tenure, the FAM stated that normal day-to-day operations should be conducted on an authorized AIS,147 yet OIG found no evidence that the Secretary requested or obtained guidance or approval to conduct official business via a personal email account on her private server&lt;/B&gt;

The FAM is the Foreign Affairs Manual, the rule book for the State Department..

Clinton has stated incessantly that she was &quot;authorized&quot; to use her private insecure home-brew bathroom closet email server..  Yet, she NEVER stated *WHO* authorized her to do this.

We now know WHY Hillary never stated who gave her the authorization.  Because NO ONE did..

Hillary lied..  Constantly and knowingly lied...

Now lying is a HUGE crime for a person with a &#039;-R&#039; after their name.. 

I am CERTAIN that ya&#039;all will hold Hillary JUST as accountable as ya&#039;all held Bush....  

Right???  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the report:</p>
<p><b>Throughout Secretary Clinton’s tenure, the FAM stated that normal day-to-day operations should be conducted on an authorized AIS,147 yet OIG found no evidence that the Secretary requested or obtained guidance or approval to conduct official business via a personal email account on her private server</b></p>
<p>The FAM is the Foreign Affairs Manual, the rule book for the State Department..</p>
<p>Clinton has stated incessantly that she was "authorized" to use her private insecure home-brew bathroom closet email server..  Yet, she NEVER stated *WHO* authorized her to do this.</p>
<p>We now know WHY Hillary never stated who gave her the authorization.  Because NO ONE did..</p>
<p>Hillary lied..  Constantly and knowingly lied...</p>
<p>Now lying is a HUGE crime for a person with a '-R' after their name.. </p>
<p>I am CERTAIN that ya'all will hold Hillary JUST as accountable as ya'all held Bush....  </p>
<p>Right???  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75785</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75785</guid>
		<description>Paula,

But hay, if you just want to talk about the spin, I&#039;ll be your huckleberry..  :D

&lt;I&gt;This was never more than some poor judgment&lt;/I&gt;

OK, so we are in complete agreement.. Hillary showed poor judgement..

And THAT poor judgement, as the HEAD of the US&#039;s entire diplomatic apparatus, disqualifies her from being President...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula,</p>
<p>But hay, if you just want to talk about the spin, I'll be your huckleberry..  :D</p>
<p><i>This was never more than some poor judgment</i></p>
<p>OK, so we are in complete agreement.. Hillary showed poor judgement..</p>
<p>And THAT poor judgement, as the HEAD of the US's entire diplomatic apparatus, disqualifies her from being President...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75784</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75784</guid>
		<description>Here is the report if you actually want to read it..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/state-department-report-on-clintons-email-practices/2039/?tid=a_inl

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the report if you actually want to read it..</p>
<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/state-department-report-on-clintons-email-practices/2039/?tid=a_inl" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/state-department-report-on-clintons-email-practices/2039/?tid=a_inl</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75783</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75783</guid>
		<description>Since Mohammed won&#039;t go to the mountain, I&#039;ll bring the Hill (get it?  Hill??  Hillary???  wow... tough room  :D  ) to Mohammed...

&lt;B&gt;found that Clinton’s use of private email for public business was “not an appropriate method” of preserving documents and that her practices failed to comply with department policies meant to ensure that federal record laws are followed.

The report says Clinton, who is the Democratic presidential front-runner, should have printed and saved her emails during her four years in office or surrendered her work-related correspondence immediately upon stepping down in February 2013. Instead, Clinton provided those records in December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office.

Clinton used an inappropriate method of preserving her documents. Her approach would not have been approved if it had been requested by a more junior member of the State Department staff.  The report also suggests that despite a Clinton aide’s insistence that the method of preserving her emails had been submitted to a legal review back in 2010, there is no evidence that such a review took place. And, here’s the kicker: Clinton refused to sit for a formal interview.&lt;/B&gt;

That last point is very important..

Clinton has said over and and over and over and over and (see where this is going??) over and over that she welcomes a chance to sit down and explain..

Apparently that was ANOTHER lie...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Mohammed won't go to the mountain, I'll bring the Hill (get it?  Hill??  Hillary???  wow... tough room  :D  ) to Mohammed...</p>
<p><b>found that Clinton’s use of private email for public business was “not an appropriate method” of preserving documents and that her practices failed to comply with department policies meant to ensure that federal record laws are followed.</p>
<p>The report says Clinton, who is the Democratic presidential front-runner, should have printed and saved her emails during her four years in office or surrendered her work-related correspondence immediately upon stepping down in February 2013. Instead, Clinton provided those records in December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office.</p>
<p>Clinton used an inappropriate method of preserving her documents. Her approach would not have been approved if it had been requested by a more junior member of the State Department staff.  The report also suggests that despite a Clinton aide’s insistence that the method of preserving her emails had been submitted to a legal review back in 2010, there is no evidence that such a review took place. And, here’s the kicker: Clinton refused to sit for a formal interview.</b></p>
<p>That last point is very important..</p>
<p>Clinton has said over and and over and over and over and (see where this is going??) over and over that she welcomes a chance to sit down and explain..</p>
<p>Apparently that was ANOTHER lie...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75780</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75780</guid>
		<description>MS,

&lt;I&gt;Thank you :-) I&#039;m just a week out of hospital and still feeling very delicate but glad to be here. :D

Posting this here so you see it, Michale. :-)&lt;/I&gt;

You take care of yerself, Mopshell...

The more people we have around here that keep me on my toes, the better..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS,</p>
<p><i>Thank you :-) I'm just a week out of hospital and still feeling very delicate but glad to be here. :D</p>
<p>Posting this here so you see it, Michale. :-)</i></p>
<p>You take care of yerself, Mopshell...</p>
<p>The more people we have around here that keep me on my toes, the better..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75775</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75775</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And Josh Marshall on the IG report re: email:&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, and Clinton campaign spokes person says the report actually praises Clinton..

I didn&#039;t ask if you read the spin from Clan Clinton..

I asked if you read the report...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And Josh Marshall on the IG report re: email:</i></p>
<p>Yea, and Clinton campaign spokes person says the report actually praises Clinton..</p>
<p>I didn't ask if you read the spin from Clan Clinton..</p>
<p>I asked if you read the report...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75767</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 22:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75767</guid>
		<description>My thanks, CW for re-posting the link to the Syrian war map on Wikipedia, since I didn&#039;t catch it first time around. Now if I could keep myself from looking at it every few hours....

While you&#039;re in Philly, I have a question that requires personal investigation. How is an authentic Philly made?

And will a call for decriminalization of pot make it into the (inevitably forgotten) platform? Or will that be shoe-horned out by DWS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thanks, CW for re-posting the link to the Syrian war map on Wikipedia, since I didn't catch it first time around. Now if I could keep myself from looking at it every few hours....</p>
<p>While you're in Philly, I have a question that requires personal investigation. How is an authentic Philly made?</p>
<p>And will a call for decriminalization of pot make it into the (inevitably forgotten) platform? Or will that be shoe-horned out by DWS...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75764</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75764</guid>
		<description>And Josh Marshall on the IG report re: email:

&lt;em&gt;A brief note on the State Department IG Report on the Clinton email issue. The ledes of a lot of stories present this as a rough hit for Clinton, bad news blah blah blah. Let&#039;s focus on the essential point: Despite the fact that there are some real questions about the impartiality of the IG, the report says the issues with the management of the Secretary of State&#039;s emails are of longstanding and go back with the last five Secretaries of State. The report also singles out Colin Powell, who had a similar set up. The criticism is there. It definitely wasn&#039;t a good arrangement. &lt;b&gt;But to see this as a damaging report after the hyperbolic and frequently insane coverage of this issue is crazy. This was never more than some poor judgment overlayed by a big bureaucratic pissing match all slathered over by a thick layer of partisan game playing and media derp.&lt;/b&gt;

Like most Clinton scandals, if there there hadn&#039;t been months, maybe more than a year of weird conspiracy theories, expected perp walks and general nonsense, one might read this and say, wow, that&#039;s disappointing. But after all that, it&#039;s just a big nothingburger. Like it almost always is.&lt;/em&gt;

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-emails</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Josh Marshall on the IG report re: email:</p>
<p><em>A brief note on the State Department IG Report on the Clinton email issue. The ledes of a lot of stories present this as a rough hit for Clinton, bad news blah blah blah. Let's focus on the essential point: Despite the fact that there are some real questions about the impartiality of the IG, the report says the issues with the management of the Secretary of State's emails are of longstanding and go back with the last five Secretaries of State. The report also singles out Colin Powell, who had a similar set up. The criticism is there. It definitely wasn't a good arrangement. <b>But to see this as a damaging report after the hyperbolic and frequently insane coverage of this issue is crazy. This was never more than some poor judgment overlayed by a big bureaucratic pissing match all slathered over by a thick layer of partisan game playing and media derp.</b></p>
<p>Like most Clinton scandals, if there there hadn't been months, maybe more than a year of weird conspiracy theories, expected perp walks and general nonsense, one might read this and say, wow, that's disappointing. But after all that, it's just a big nothingburger. Like it almost always is.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-emails" rel="nofollow">http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-emails</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75755</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 16:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75755</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Military experience is over rated in terms of understanding, commenting upon and implementing military strategy.&lt;/I&gt;

Says the people with no military experience..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Military experience is over rated in terms of understanding, commenting upon and implementing military strategy.</i></p>
<p>Says the people with no military experience..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75744</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75744</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have to admit in the interests of full disclosure that I am in no way qualified to make military predictions.&quot; -CW

Military experience is over rated in terms of understanding, commenting upon and implementing military strategy.  

As historian/analyst and prolific war game designer Jim Dunnigan puts it: &quot;Many of the most incompetent wartime leaders have been highly regarded peacetime military leaders.&quot;  General George McClellan is a classic example.

&quot;Even in the most experienced armies, a large proportion, even 50 percent or more, of leaders will prove incompetent in wartime.&quot;  - another Dunniganism.

The secret to good analysis is to ask the right questions and follow the path of answers without fear or favor. Post Iraq War II, the US public has no interest in either activity , and nearly all the mass media press cheerfully meets this need.

Good work CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I have to admit in the interests of full disclosure that I am in no way qualified to make military predictions." -CW</p>
<p>Military experience is over rated in terms of understanding, commenting upon and implementing military strategy.  </p>
<p>As historian/analyst and prolific war game designer Jim Dunnigan puts it: "Many of the most incompetent wartime leaders have been highly regarded peacetime military leaders."  General George McClellan is a classic example.</p>
<p>"Even in the most experienced armies, a large proportion, even 50 percent or more, of leaders will prove incompetent in wartime."  - another Dunniganism.</p>
<p>The secret to good analysis is to ask the right questions and follow the path of answers without fear or favor. Post Iraq War II, the US public has no interest in either activity , and nearly all the mass media press cheerfully meets this need.</p>
<p>Good work CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mopshell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75734</link>
		<dc:creator>Mopshell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 11:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75734</guid>
		<description>Michale [101] Friday Talking Points 392 -

&lt;i&gt;Glad ta see ya!!! :D&lt;/i&gt;

Thank you :-) I&#039;m just a week out of hospital and still feeling very delicate but glad to be here. :D

Posting this here so you see it, Michale. :-)

CW -

I also remember the column re your Fallujah prediction and add my congrats to Paula&#039;s - good work, very good work!

Working on catching up with all the columns I missed while in hospital but I&#039;m slow with everything at the moment so it&#039;s taking me a while. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale [101] Friday Talking Points 392 -</p>
<p><i>Glad ta see ya!!! :D</i></p>
<p>Thank you :-) I'm just a week out of hospital and still feeling very delicate but glad to be here. :D</p>
<p>Posting this here so you see it, Michale. :-)</p>
<p>CW -</p>
<p>I also remember the column re your Fallujah prediction and add my congrats to Paula's - good work, very good work!</p>
<p>Working on catching up with all the columns I missed while in hospital but I'm slow with everything at the moment so it's taking me a while. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75729</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 10:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75729</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Nothing, nothing, will surprise me more than if Sane Republicans try to do something to unseat the Donald. But my money&#039;s on the whole sad sack bunch lining up like they always do.&lt;/I&gt;

Sounds like yer suffering from &quot;lining up&quot; envy...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nothing, nothing, will surprise me more than if Sane Republicans try to do something to unseat the Donald. But my money's on the whole sad sack bunch lining up like they always do.</i></p>
<p>Sounds like yer suffering from "lining up" envy...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75724</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 09:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75724</guid>
		<description>Michale -

I am always interested in fisticuffs on a convention floor, no matter who throws the first punch. 

Heh.

Paula -

Good point about both the people who will stay away from the GOP fest, and about the &quot;sad looking Chris Christies&quot; -- heh.

And thanks for the shout-out about the Fallujah column.  When I get things right, I am absolutely shameless about pointing it out, I honestly have to admit...

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale -</p>
<p>I am always interested in fisticuffs on a convention floor, no matter who throws the first punch. </p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>Paula -</p>
<p>Good point about both the people who will stay away from the GOP fest, and about the "sad looking Chris Christies" -- heh.</p>
<p>And thanks for the shout-out about the Fallujah column.  When I get things right, I am absolutely shameless about pointing it out, I honestly have to admit...</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75719</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 01:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75719</guid>
		<description>I remember the column about Fallujah, BTW. Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the column about Fallujah, BTW. Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75718</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 01:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75718</guid>
		<description>If you had to get into one of them, I&#039;m glad it&#039;s the Dem convention. The Repub convention will probably turn into some horrible reality-show bore. The rabid righties will be there cheering; the Repubs with consciences and some understanding of history won&#039;t be there at all; the go alongers who object to Trump but lack the character to walk away will be there trying to appear like they&#039;re somewhere else. They won&#039;t object or raise hell, they&#039;ll be a bunch of sad looking Chris Christies. 

Nothing, nothing, will surprise me more than if Sane Republicans try to do something to unseat the Donald. But my money&#039;s on the whole sad sack bunch lining up like they always do.

The whole thing will probably feel like some ghastly gathering in a hotel where you listen to the salesman yap about the condo in Florida because you&#039;ll get the free gift when it&#039;s over. 

Donald will probably pay people to attend -- we&#039;ll find out about that after it&#039;s over and some schmo admits on Facebook that he applied through a temp agency and made $8.00 an hour to hang around and cheer when directed.

Philly will actually be interesting and historic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you had to get into one of them, I'm glad it's the Dem convention. The Repub convention will probably turn into some horrible reality-show bore. The rabid righties will be there cheering; the Repubs with consciences and some understanding of history won't be there at all; the go alongers who object to Trump but lack the character to walk away will be there trying to appear like they're somewhere else. They won't object or raise hell, they'll be a bunch of sad looking Chris Christies. </p>
<p>Nothing, nothing, will surprise me more than if Sane Republicans try to do something to unseat the Donald. But my money's on the whole sad sack bunch lining up like they always do.</p>
<p>The whole thing will probably feel like some ghastly gathering in a hotel where you listen to the salesman yap about the condo in Florida because you'll get the free gift when it's over. </p>
<p>Donald will probably pay people to attend -- we'll find out about that after it's over and some schmo admits on Facebook that he applied through a temp agency and made $8.00 an hour to hang around and cheer when directed.</p>
<p>Philly will actually be interesting and historic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comment-75715</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268#comment-75715</guid>
		<description>Well, at least you will be able to cover the fisti-cuffs of the Democrat Convention, eh???  

That&#039;s gotta be worth something...  :D

Congrats, CW   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least you will be able to cover the fisti-cuffs of the Democrat Convention, eh???  </p>
<p>That's gotta be worth something...  :D</p>
<p>Congrats, CW   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
