<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beating Trump Not So Easy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 20:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70789</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70789</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;just make sure you use your &quot;inside voice&quot; when you respond, and direct discussions here. sharing your honest opinions on contentious issues on that site will probably get you booted again.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, definitely sound advice...

I am beginning to wonder if I have been shadow-banned.  I got a notification that this FRAN person responded to one of my comments.  But damned if I can find it..  

Oh well.  It&#039;s still fun..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>just make sure you use your "inside voice" when you respond, and direct discussions here. sharing your honest opinions on contentious issues on that site will probably get you booted again.</i></p>
<p>Yea, definitely sound advice...</p>
<p>I am beginning to wonder if I have been shadow-banned.  I got a notification that this FRAN person responded to one of my comments.  But damned if I can find it..  </p>
<p>Oh well.  It's still fun..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70785</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70785</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;My stocks are through the roof (up about 175% since Feb 2009 - whoot! whoot!),&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, you Wall Streeters are doing great!!!  :D

The 1% have gotten filthy richer and the middle class and poor have been hosed...

Ask Joe and Jane SixPack how THEY like their lives....

That&#039;s the REAL determination of how good Obama has done...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My stocks are through the roof (up about 175% since Feb 2009 - whoot! whoot!),</i></p>
<p>Yea, you Wall Streeters are doing great!!!  :D</p>
<p>The 1% have gotten filthy richer and the middle class and poor have been hosed...</p>
<p>Ask Joe and Jane SixPack how THEY like their lives....</p>
<p>That's the REAL determination of how good Obama has done...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70783</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70783</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I guess there ARE still some quality commenters on HuffPoo.. I came across this gem this morning and just HAD to share it..&lt;/i&gt;

just make sure you use your &quot;inside voice&quot; when you respond, and direct discussions here. sharing your honest opinions on contentious issues on that site will probably get you booted again.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I guess there ARE still some quality commenters on HuffPoo.. I came across this gem this morning and just HAD to share it..</i></p>
<p>just make sure you use your "inside voice" when you respond, and direct discussions here. sharing your honest opinions on contentious issues on that site will probably get you booted again.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70781</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70781</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;In 10-15 years time the whole country will look back on Obama without the current emotions (except for the racists who are always gonna hate) and realize what a good president he has been.&lt;/I&gt;

I&#039;ll take that action..

Future historians will say that Obama made Jimmy Carter look presidential..

How are race relations after 7 years of Obama??

How is the partisan divide after 7 years of Obama??

The mere fact that Donald Trump is going to be our next POTUS is a testament to how bad Obama has been for this country...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In 10-15 years time the whole country will look back on Obama without the current emotions (except for the racists who are always gonna hate) and realize what a good president he has been.</i></p>
<p>I'll take that action..</p>
<p>Future historians will say that Obama made Jimmy Carter look presidential..</p>
<p>How are race relations after 7 years of Obama??</p>
<p>How is the partisan divide after 7 years of Obama??</p>
<p>The mere fact that Donald Trump is going to be our next POTUS is a testament to how bad Obama has been for this country...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70780</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70780</guid>
		<description>@Michale [31]

We disagree on your assessment of Obama&#039;s record - I think he has done an excellent job. My stocks are through the roof (up about 175% since Feb 2009 - whoot! whoot!), interest rates and inflation are low, America is working, he has kept us out of the morass in the middle East, stopped the pointless nonsense with Cuba, got a good deal with Iran and teed up TPP and TTIP.

The losers are mostly poorly educated Americans - which is a real problem and I have a lot of sympathy. They have to compete with the poorest people on the planet for very fungible and mobile jobs. From a global economic perspective, &lt;b&gt;Trump is right, poorly educated American workers are getting paid too much.&lt;/b&gt; This is due to globalization - a trend that can hardly be pinned on Obama, despite the manipulation of the poorly educated and informed by Fox News, etc.

In 10-15 years time the whole country will look back on Obama without the current emotions (except for the racists who are always gonna hate) and realize what a good president he has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michale [31]</p>
<p>We disagree on your assessment of Obama's record - I think he has done an excellent job. My stocks are through the roof (up about 175% since Feb 2009 - whoot! whoot!), interest rates and inflation are low, America is working, he has kept us out of the morass in the middle East, stopped the pointless nonsense with Cuba, got a good deal with Iran and teed up TPP and TTIP.</p>
<p>The losers are mostly poorly educated Americans - which is a real problem and I have a lot of sympathy. They have to compete with the poorest people on the planet for very fungible and mobile jobs. From a global economic perspective, <b>Trump is right, poorly educated American workers are getting paid too much.</b> This is due to globalization - a trend that can hardly be pinned on Obama, despite the manipulation of the poorly educated and informed by Fox News, etc.</p>
<p>In 10-15 years time the whole country will look back on Obama without the current emotions (except for the racists who are always gonna hate) and realize what a good president he has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70774</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70774</guid>
		<description>Hay CW,

I have a couple comments in the NNL filter... Could you just post the first one???  The second is a duplicate...

Tanks.... And planes!!!  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay CW,</p>
<p>I have a couple comments in the NNL filter... Could you just post the first one???  The second is a duplicate...</p>
<p>Tanks.... And planes!!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70773</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70773</guid>
		<description>Hillary hasn&#039;t OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...

Those kinds of attacks have always been &quot;off the record&quot; and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..

We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..

Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary hasn't OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...</p>
<p>Those kinds of attacks have always been "off the record" and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..</p>
<p>We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..</p>
<p>Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70772</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70772</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced. She&#039;s dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor. If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.&lt;/I&gt;

Hillary hasn&#039;t OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...

Those kinds of attacks have always been &quot;off the record&quot; and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..

We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..

Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced. She's dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor. If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.</i></p>
<p>Hillary hasn't OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...</p>
<p>Those kinds of attacks have always been "off the record" and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..</p>
<p>We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..</p>
<p>Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70771</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70771</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced. She&#039;s dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor. If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.&lt;/I&gt;

Hillary hasn&#039;t OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...

Those kinds of attacks have always been &quot;off the record&quot; and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..

We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..

Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??

Let me give you a little taste as to how it will go down..

Hillary: &lt;B&gt;&quot;Donald, could you explain the gross and crude sexist remarks you made about Megyn Kelly??&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Trump: &lt;B&gt;&quot;I could, but I think everyone would rather you explain how you could support your husband when he raped women and sexually assaulted women and how you could attack your husband&#039;s victims in such vile and disgusting ways..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

POINT: TRUMP

Read the Chuck Todd article from above...

After that first foray into the Trump/Hillary dynamic where Trump took a HUGE chunk out of Hill&#039;s and Bill&#039;s ass and spit it out, Hill/Bill are petrified of Trump...

The Clintons are expecting that Trump will play by the rules..  

HA!!!!   Ain&#039;t gonna happen...

It&#039;s going to be Trump&#039;s game and Trump&#039;s rules..  

It&#039;s that simple....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced. She's dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor. If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.</i></p>
<p>Hillary hasn't OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...</p>
<p>Those kinds of attacks have always been "off the record" and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..</p>
<p>We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..</p>
<p>Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??</p>
<p>Let me give you a little taste as to how it will go down..</p>
<p>Hillary: <b>"Donald, could you explain the gross and crude sexist remarks you made about Megyn Kelly??"</b></p>
<p>Trump: <b>"I could, but I think everyone would rather you explain how you could support your husband when he raped women and sexually assaulted women and how you could attack your husband's victims in such vile and disgusting ways.."</b></p>
<p>POINT: TRUMP</p>
<p>Read the Chuck Todd article from above...</p>
<p>After that first foray into the Trump/Hillary dynamic where Trump took a HUGE chunk out of Hill's and Bill's ass and spit it out, Hill/Bill are petrified of Trump...</p>
<p>The Clintons are expecting that Trump will play by the rules..  </p>
<p>HA!!!!   Ain't gonna happen...</p>
<p>It's going to be Trump's game and Trump's rules..  </p>
<p>It's that simple....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70770</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70770</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced. She&#039;s dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor. If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.&lt;/I&gt;

Hillary hasn&#039;t OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...

Those kinds of attacks have always been &quot;off the record&quot; and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..

We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..

Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??

Let me give you a little taste as to how it will go down..

Hillary: &lt;B&gt;&quot;Donald, could you explain the gross and crude sexist remarks you made about Megyn Kelly??&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Trump: &lt;B&gt;&quot;I could, but I think everyone would rather you explain how you could support your husband when he raped women and sexually assaulted women and how you could attack your husband&#039;s victims in such vile and disgusting ways..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

POINT: TRUMP

&lt;B&gt;Chuck Todd: Hillary Will ‘Long For The Days Of Ken Starr When Running Against Trump’&lt;/B&gt;
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/

After that first foray into the Trump/Hillary dynamic where Trump took a HUGE chunk out of Hill&#039;s and Bill&#039;s ass and spit it out, Hill/Bill are petrified of Trump...

The Clintons are expecting that Trump will play by the rules..  

HA!!!!   Ain&#039;t gonna happen...

It&#039;s going to be Trump&#039;s game and Trump&#039;s rules..  

It&#039;s that simple....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced. She's dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor. If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.</i></p>
<p>Hillary hasn't OFFICIALLY endured the the types of insults and attacks that Trump favors...</p>
<p>Those kinds of attacks have always been "off the record" and whispered in back rooms and THOSE attacks are easy for Hillary to ignore or ridicule..</p>
<p>We have already had a preview of how a Trump/Hillary match-up will go down, when Hillary accused Trump of sexism..</p>
<p>Hill *AND* Bill shut up pretty damn fast after that, eh??</p>
<p>Let me give you a little taste as to how it will go down..</p>
<p>Hillary: <b>"Donald, could you explain the gross and crude sexist remarks you made about Megyn Kelly??"</b></p>
<p>Trump: <b>"I could, but I think everyone would rather you explain how you could support your husband when he raped women and sexually assaulted women and how you could attack your husband's victims in such vile and disgusting ways.."</b></p>
<p>POINT: TRUMP</p>
<p><b>Chuck Todd: Hillary Will ‘Long For The Days Of Ken Starr When Running Against Trump’</b><br />
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/</a></p>
<p>After that first foray into the Trump/Hillary dynamic where Trump took a HUGE chunk out of Hill's and Bill's ass and spit it out, Hill/Bill are petrified of Trump...</p>
<p>The Clintons are expecting that Trump will play by the rules..  </p>
<p>HA!!!!   Ain't gonna happen...</p>
<p>It's going to be Trump's game and Trump's rules..  </p>
<p>It's that simple....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70765</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70765</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s not ideology.&lt;/I&gt;

There&#039;s an echo in here..  :D heh

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It's not ideology.</i></p>
<p>There's an echo in here..  :D heh</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70764</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70764</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Why Trump might be the best Republican to take on Hillary&lt;/B&gt;
http://nypost.com/2016/02/24/why-trump-might-be-the-best-republican-to-take-on-hillary/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Why Trump might be the best Republican to take on Hillary</b><br />
<a href="http://nypost.com/2016/02/24/why-trump-might-be-the-best-republican-to-take-on-hillary/" rel="nofollow">http://nypost.com/2016/02/24/why-trump-might-be-the-best-republican-to-take-on-hillary/</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70760</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70760</guid>
		<description>I guess there ARE still some quality commenters on HuffPoo..  I came across this gem this morning and just HAD to share it..


Reno Wanderer

Here is how the DNC made a conscious strategy decision eight years ago, they could possibly screw you ever in a huuuuge way. 

The change candidate, almost exclusively, wins Presidential elections. Especially after an 8 year term by one Party or the other. That&#039;s just the way it is. Now regardless of whether you like it or not, or are 180 degrees opposed to his brand of change, no one can honestly deny that Trump is widely seen as the change candidate. In a Hillary vs Trump match up, she&#039;s the Washington quagmire establishment candidate and he&#039;s the &#039;change all that&#039; candidate. You would be either deliberately lying, or deliberately burying your head in the sand if you refuse to admit that Trumps flag is now unfurled in a stiff wind of change. Here is where the DNC royally screwed up. The had 8 years to groom, and come up with a real exciting, energetic, get out the base, rev up the electorate type candidate, and they did nothing....nothing on that front for 8 years. At the DNC level they made the calculated decision to thwart and sandbag and stall any effort on that front because they made the promise to the Clintons eight years ago that this was Hillary&#039;s show. Eight years ago, they made that decision. So here we are, running a coronated, over confident, status quo, Washington quagmire, back to the future pantsuit from 1996, in a year when the electorate is screaming for a &quot;change the Washington Culture election&quot;. Best of luck to us I guess.

So dead on ballz accurate, it&#039;s scary...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess there ARE still some quality commenters on HuffPoo..  I came across this gem this morning and just HAD to share it..</p>
<p>Reno Wanderer</p>
<p>Here is how the DNC made a conscious strategy decision eight years ago, they could possibly screw you ever in a huuuuge way. </p>
<p>The change candidate, almost exclusively, wins Presidential elections. Especially after an 8 year term by one Party or the other. That's just the way it is. Now regardless of whether you like it or not, or are 180 degrees opposed to his brand of change, no one can honestly deny that Trump is widely seen as the change candidate. In a Hillary vs Trump match up, she's the Washington quagmire establishment candidate and he's the 'change all that' candidate. You would be either deliberately lying, or deliberately burying your head in the sand if you refuse to admit that Trumps flag is now unfurled in a stiff wind of change. Here is where the DNC royally screwed up. The had 8 years to groom, and come up with a real exciting, energetic, get out the base, rev up the electorate type candidate, and they did nothing....nothing on that front for 8 years. At the DNC level they made the calculated decision to thwart and sandbag and stall any effort on that front because they made the promise to the Clintons eight years ago that this was Hillary's show. Eight years ago, they made that decision. So here we are, running a coronated, over confident, status quo, Washington quagmire, back to the future pantsuit from 1996, in a year when the electorate is screaming for a "change the Washington Culture election". Best of luck to us I guess.</p>
<p>So dead on ballz accurate, it's scary...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70758</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70758</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;If any of these people get into the White House it will be the beginning of the end of the American Empire. We have ruled the world since the early 1900&#039;s when we took over the mantle from the Brits. Who will these clowns usher in? Germany? China? The historians are going to have enough material for a century.&lt;/I&gt;

Just remember, Neil..  In 2008 everyone (myself included) thought Obama was going to be the greatest president ever and was going to fix this country...

We were all tragically wrong..

Your prediction about President Trump is likely to be just as wrong as our prediction about President Obama..

I mean, let&#039;s face it.  Ya&#039;all&#039;s prediction ability on Trump is worse than my prediction ability on SCOTUS rulings...

Think about it..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If any of these people get into the White House it will be the beginning of the end of the American Empire. We have ruled the world since the early 1900's when we took over the mantle from the Brits. Who will these clowns usher in? Germany? China? The historians are going to have enough material for a century.</i></p>
<p>Just remember, Neil..  In 2008 everyone (myself included) thought Obama was going to be the greatest president ever and was going to fix this country...</p>
<p>We were all tragically wrong..</p>
<p>Your prediction about President Trump is likely to be just as wrong as our prediction about President Obama..</p>
<p>I mean, let's face it.  Ya'all's prediction ability on Trump is worse than my prediction ability on SCOTUS rulings...</p>
<p>Think about it..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70757</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70757</guid>
		<description>Well Marky-boy really took a swing at The Donald tonight. Aided and abetted by the greasy side kick Crazio.

What a performance. I just stopped laughing for a few minutes to remind myself that these clowns were vying to occupy the most serious seat on the planet.

If any of these people get into the White House it will be the beginning of the end of the American Empire. We have ruled the world since the early 1900&#039;s when we took over the mantle from the Brits. Who will these clowns usher in? Germany? China? The historians are going to have enough material for a century.

Let&#039;s hope, as I do, that Hillary gets eight years, the demographics finally become apparent even to the GOP and we get some real thinkers and leaders from the center right. We need them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Marky-boy really took a swing at The Donald tonight. Aided and abetted by the greasy side kick Crazio.</p>
<p>What a performance. I just stopped laughing for a few minutes to remind myself that these clowns were vying to occupy the most serious seat on the planet.</p>
<p>If any of these people get into the White House it will be the beginning of the end of the American Empire. We have ruled the world since the early 1900's when we took over the mantle from the Brits. Who will these clowns usher in? Germany? China? The historians are going to have enough material for a century.</p>
<p>Let's hope, as I do, that Hillary gets eight years, the demographics finally become apparent even to the GOP and we get some real thinkers and leaders from the center right. We need them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70756</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70756</guid>
		<description>Oooo!!  Look at THAT shiny thing over there!!! THAT will sink Trump for sure!!!!!  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooo!!  Look at THAT shiny thing over there!!! THAT will sink Trump for sure!!!!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne Ink</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70755</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70755</guid>
		<description>Keep your eye on the Trump University lawsuits. He&#039;s going to take the witness stand in Sand Diego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep your eye on the Trump University lawsuits. He's going to take the witness stand in Sand Diego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70754</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70754</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I still think the &#039;NASCAR&#039; comment could cook Trump&#039;s goose however &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, along with most of the other ones on the list.  It&#039;s not ideology.  It&#039;s identity politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I still think the 'NASCAR' comment could cook Trump's goose however </i></p>
<p>Yes, along with most of the other ones on the list.  It's not ideology.  It's identity politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70753</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70753</guid>
		<description>Neil,

&lt;B&gt;Chuck Todd: Hillary Will ‘Long For The Days Of Ken Starr When Running Against Trump’&lt;/B&gt;
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/

Bill &amp; Hill are petrified of running against Trump because Trump won&#039;t play by Clinton rules..

And the Clintons don&#039;t know how to play by Trump&#039;s...

It&#039;s going to be a massacre...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p><b>Chuck Todd: Hillary Will ‘Long For The Days Of Ken Starr When Running Against Trump’</b><br />
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/</a></p>
<p>Bill &amp; Hill are petrified of running against Trump because Trump won't play by Clinton rules..</p>
<p>And the Clintons don't know how to play by Trump's...</p>
<p>It's going to be a massacre...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70752</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70752</guid>
		<description>Neil,

&lt;B&gt;
 
       
DailyCaller

 

HOME
2016
POLITICS
US
WORLD
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
BUSINESS
EDUCATION
OPINION
OUTDOORS
ENERGY
BLOGS
THE MIRROR
MATT LEWIS
DC TRAWLER
SEND A TIP
 

 
ELECTIONS
Chuck Todd: Hillary Will ‘Long For The Days Of Ken Starr When Running Against Trump’


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/#ixzz41Dd72vVn&lt;/B&gt;
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/

Bill &amp; Hill are petrified of running against Trump because Trump won&#039;t play by Clinton rules..

And the Clintons don&#039;t know how to play by Trump&#039;s...

It&#039;s going to be a massacre...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p><b></p>
<p>DailyCaller</p>
<p>HOME<br />
2016<br />
POLITICS<br />
US<br />
WORLD<br />
ENTERTAINMENT<br />
SPORTS<br />
BUSINESS<br />
EDUCATION<br />
OPINION<br />
OUTDOORS<br />
ENERGY<br />
BLOGS<br />
THE MIRROR<br />
MATT LEWIS<br />
DC TRAWLER<br />
SEND A TIP</p>
<p>ELECTIONS<br />
Chuck Todd: Hillary Will ‘Long For The Days Of Ken Starr When Running Against Trump’</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/#ixzz41Dd72vVn" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/#ixzz41Dd72vVn</a></b><br />
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/25/chuck-todd-predicts-race-to-the-bottom-if-hillary-faces-trump-video/</a></p>
<p>Bill &amp; Hill are petrified of running against Trump because Trump won't play by Clinton rules..</p>
<p>And the Clintons don't know how to play by Trump's...</p>
<p>It's going to be a massacre...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70746</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70746</guid>
		<description>parties</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>parties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70745</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70745</guid>
		<description>Ezra Klein on VOX today: &quot;arties are vehicles for structuring information. Their role is literally to help voters decide by helping them choose whom to trust. The fact that Republican voters seem to prefer candidates whom their party is screaming not to trust reveals a profound failure in the GOP&#039;s core role. The Republican Party is broken.&quot;

It seems the Repub base has finally figured out they&#039;ve been duped, duped, duped. While Donald is not the answer it is ever-so-slightly heartening that a lot of these folks have resonated with the idea of &quot;honesty&quot;. They believe the Donald is honest because he has the luxury of being so -- he has enough money to be untouchable. It&#039;s a sad, sad state that we&#039;ve come to this but it also illuminates very real problems which the-powers-that-be have either actively encouraged or blithely ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ezra Klein on VOX today: "arties are vehicles for structuring information. Their role is literally to help voters decide by helping them choose whom to trust. The fact that Republican voters seem to prefer candidates whom their party is screaming not to trust reveals a profound failure in the GOP's core role. The Republican Party is broken."</p>
<p>It seems the Repub base has finally figured out they've been duped, duped, duped. While Donald is not the answer it is ever-so-slightly heartening that a lot of these folks have resonated with the idea of "honesty". They believe the Donald is honest because he has the luxury of being so -- he has enough money to be untouchable. It's a sad, sad state that we've come to this but it also illuminates very real problems which the-powers-that-be have either actively encouraged or blithely ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70743</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70743</guid>
		<description>Bill, Hillary, and even Chelsea (starting at age 12) have been through this, and they can handle it.

It isn&#039;t about sympathy - have you been watching the election so far? It is about personality, and the trashing of Trump and his family&#039;s personalities will be news - the Clintons are old hat.

Plus the Clintons have not been attacking the press on a continual basis - we always hear the myth about the &#039;left wing media&#039; - well if there is a &#039;left wing media&#039; it will come out fighting after Trump has destroyed the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, Hillary, and even Chelsea (starting at age 12) have been through this, and they can handle it.</p>
<p>It isn't about sympathy - have you been watching the election so far? It is about personality, and the trashing of Trump and his family's personalities will be news - the Clintons are old hat.</p>
<p>Plus the Clintons have not been attacking the press on a continual basis - we always hear the myth about the 'left wing media' - well if there is a 'left wing media' it will come out fighting after Trump has destroyed the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70744</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70744</guid>
		<description>Bill, Hillary, and even Chelsea (starting at age 12) have been through this, and they can handle it.

It isn&#039;t about sympathy - have you been watching the election so far? It is about personality, and the trashing of Trump and his family&#039;s personalities will be news - the Clintons are old hat.

Plus the Clintons have not been attacking the press on a continual basis - we always hear the myth about the &#039;left wing media&#039; - well if there is a &#039;left wing media&#039; it will come out fighting after Trump has destroyed the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, Hillary, and even Chelsea (starting at age 12) have been through this, and they can handle it.</p>
<p>It isn't about sympathy - have you been watching the election so far? It is about personality, and the trashing of Trump and his family's personalities will be news - the Clintons are old hat.</p>
<p>Plus the Clintons have not been attacking the press on a continual basis - we always hear the myth about the 'left wing media' - well if there is a 'left wing media' it will come out fighting after Trump has destroyed the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70742</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70742</guid>
		<description>Michale:

You may well be right - but the angriest people I know are my Republican friends - and they were angry even before Trump came along. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I have to listen to a lot of vomit inducing self-righteousness on the left (anti-Israeli, anti-American knee jerk stuff, etc.), but this anger will be directed against Trump.

The non-angry majority are less likely to put up with Trump, and those on the left will be sated by Elizabeth Warren, who I expect to be a big Hillary supporter on the General Election.

I still think the &#039;NASCAR&#039; comment could cook Trump&#039;s goose however ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale:</p>
<p>You may well be right - but the angriest people I know are my Republican friends - and they were angry even before Trump came along. Don't get me wrong, I have to listen to a lot of vomit inducing self-righteousness on the left (anti-Israeli, anti-American knee jerk stuff, etc.), but this anger will be directed against Trump.</p>
<p>The non-angry majority are less likely to put up with Trump, and those on the left will be sated by Elizabeth Warren, who I expect to be a big Hillary supporter on the General Election.</p>
<p>I still think the 'NASCAR' comment could cook Trump's goose however ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70741</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70741</guid>
		<description>So, what you are saying is that Hillary will get SYMPATHY when people go after her family..

But Trump will get scorn???

Isn&#039;t it possible that it might be the other way around??

That Hillary gets the scorn and Trump gets the sympathy??

Possible???  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what you are saying is that Hillary will get SYMPATHY when people go after her family..</p>
<p>But Trump will get scorn???</p>
<p>Isn't it possible that it might be the other way around??</p>
<p>That Hillary gets the scorn and Trump gets the sympathy??</p>
<p>Possible???  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70740</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70740</guid>
		<description>Trump&#039;s family comes into play in the General Election - he has already brought Bill in, so Melania Trump&#039;s background will get a thorough vetting, as will the pics of his boys killing and cutting the tails off elephants (you killed Dumbo!). The hope will be that Trump loses it and really goes off the deep end when his family are attacked.

Also expect to see video clips of Trump wrestling on the ground at a WWE event, and a host of bizarre, bigoted past statements being released day after day after day, with calls for Trump to &#039;explain&#039;. 

Baiting the family into &#039;unfortunate&#039; remarks will also be a new sport the media will enjoy - they have zero love for Trump already, and when they see how much this pisses them off, they will only double down.

The General Election will make South Carolina look like an afternoon tea party at Buckingham Palace. There is a lot of material on both sides, but Trump has a lot more to worry about - just about everything that has been dug up on Clinton has already been, and the email server is a tempest-in-a-teacup, despite the desperation of the Republicans to salvage anything from the Benghazi! fiasco.

Frankly, I don&#039;t understand why the Republicans aren&#039;t going after Trump with more verve already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump's family comes into play in the General Election - he has already brought Bill in, so Melania Trump's background will get a thorough vetting, as will the pics of his boys killing and cutting the tails off elephants (you killed Dumbo!). The hope will be that Trump loses it and really goes off the deep end when his family are attacked.</p>
<p>Also expect to see video clips of Trump wrestling on the ground at a WWE event, and a host of bizarre, bigoted past statements being released day after day after day, with calls for Trump to 'explain'. </p>
<p>Baiting the family into 'unfortunate' remarks will also be a new sport the media will enjoy - they have zero love for Trump already, and when they see how much this pisses them off, they will only double down.</p>
<p>The General Election will make South Carolina look like an afternoon tea party at Buckingham Palace. There is a lot of material on both sides, but Trump has a lot more to worry about - just about everything that has been dug up on Clinton has already been, and the email server is a tempest-in-a-teacup, despite the desperation of the Republicans to salvage anything from the Benghazi! fiasco.</p>
<p>Frankly, I don't understand why the Republicans aren't going after Trump with more verve already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70739</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70739</guid>
		<description>Neil,

Re #9...

Maybe you should add to your list, &lt;B&gt;&quot;Planned Parenthood is a worthwhile organization and SHOULD be funded.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Oh wait...

Trump DID say that...

And his numbers went up....  :D

Like I said, ya&#039;all just don&#039;t get it..  

It&#039;s NOT about political ideology...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>Re #9...</p>
<p>Maybe you should add to your list, <b>"Planned Parenthood is a worthwhile organization and SHOULD be funded."</b></p>
<p>Oh wait...</p>
<p>Trump DID say that...</p>
<p>And his numbers went up....  :D</p>
<p>Like I said, ya'all just don't get it..  </p>
<p>It's NOT about political ideology...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleyd</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70738</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70738</guid>
		<description>It will be very interesting to see how Trump fairs in the general election campaign (if it gets to that point).  As you implied, he will be facing completely new types of attacks from directions that he&#039;s not had to deal with yet.  For one thing, Trump really hasn&#039;t really faced all that many attacks yet anyway.  Most of his competitors have focused their attacks on each other, and allowed Trump to sit back and attack targets of opportunity.  Even when he has been attacked, so far, most of the attacks he&#039;s dealt with have been attacks on him rather than his policies, and those are attacks he&#039;s dealt with for decades.  You can&#039;t shame him or embarrass him by pointing to things he&#039;s said or done, but that&#039;s pretty much all his republican opponents have tried to do.  They haven&#039;t had much of a choice, because their own policies are very similar, and similarly lacking in substance.

The Democratic nominee, however, will have an incentive to attack his policy.  It will be in their best interest to point out how his policies are either unfeasible, impractical, or insubstantial.  I&#039;m not sure how Trump will be able to fight back against attacks like that, as most of his counters against the Republicans seem to amount to little more than &quot;I know you are, but what am I?&quot;  When his policy is attacked instead of he himself, how will he be able to respond?  Will he counter by attempting to insult the critic, or will he actually try to defend his policy?  I would like to think that the American electorate as a whole would be more interested in actual policy, so this could be a real challenge for him.

Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced.  She&#039;s dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor.  If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be very interesting to see how Trump fairs in the general election campaign (if it gets to that point).  As you implied, he will be facing completely new types of attacks from directions that he's not had to deal with yet.  For one thing, Trump really hasn't really faced all that many attacks yet anyway.  Most of his competitors have focused their attacks on each other, and allowed Trump to sit back and attack targets of opportunity.  Even when he has been attacked, so far, most of the attacks he's dealt with have been attacks on him rather than his policies, and those are attacks he's dealt with for decades.  You can't shame him or embarrass him by pointing to things he's said or done, but that's pretty much all his republican opponents have tried to do.  They haven't had much of a choice, because their own policies are very similar, and similarly lacking in substance.</p>
<p>The Democratic nominee, however, will have an incentive to attack his policy.  It will be in their best interest to point out how his policies are either unfeasible, impractical, or insubstantial.  I'm not sure how Trump will be able to fight back against attacks like that, as most of his counters against the Republicans seem to amount to little more than "I know you are, but what am I?"  When his policy is attacked instead of he himself, how will he be able to respond?  Will he counter by attempting to insult the critic, or will he actually try to defend his policy?  I would like to think that the American electorate as a whole would be more interested in actual policy, so this could be a real challenge for him.</p>
<p>Even putting that aside though, I think Hillary Clinton (assuming she wins the nomination) will be far tougher to bully than any of the Republican candidates Trump has faced.  She's dealt with more mudslinging in her career than the entire Republican field combined, including the exact kinds of personal insults that Trump tends to favor.  If anyone can withstand Trump and trade blows with him, it would be her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70737</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70737</guid>
		<description>JL,

&lt;I&gt;&quot;There are millions of miserable people in America who know exactly who engineered the shattering of their worlds, and Trump isn’t one of those people – and, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, everyone else in the field is running on the basis of their experience being one of those people.

&quot;When you are abused and bullied enough, anyone willing to beat up or burn down whomever put you in that position is your friend. Even a bully can be a hero if he targets others bullies – and that is, more or less, what Trump has done since day one.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

THAT is so dead on ballz accurate, it&#039;s scary...

And THAT is why Trump will win..

It&#039;s not about ideology..

Trump empowers the powerless, even if it&#039;s only PERCEIVED power..  

&lt;B&gt;POWER PERCEIVED IS POWER ACHIEVED&lt;/B&gt;

It&#039;s THAT simple....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JL,</p>
<p><i>"There are millions of miserable people in America who know exactly who engineered the shattering of their worlds, and Trump isn’t one of those people – and, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, everyone else in the field is running on the basis of their experience being one of those people.</p>
<p>"When you are abused and bullied enough, anyone willing to beat up or burn down whomever put you in that position is your friend. Even a bully can be a hero if he targets others bullies – and that is, more or less, what Trump has done since day one."</i></p>
<p>THAT is so dead on ballz accurate, it's scary...</p>
<p>And THAT is why Trump will win..</p>
<p>It's not about ideology..</p>
<p>Trump empowers the powerless, even if it's only PERCEIVED power..  </p>
<p><b>POWER PERCEIVED IS POWER ACHIEVED</b></p>
<p>It's THAT simple....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70736</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70736</guid>
		<description>Neil,

Trump has said WORSE things than that..

And his numbers grew and continue to grow..

Ya&#039;all just don&#039;t get it...

It&#039;s not about ideology....  If it were about ideology, Trump would be a distant memory....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>Trump has said WORSE things than that..</p>
<p>And his numbers grew and continue to grow..</p>
<p>Ya'all just don't get it...</p>
<p>It's not about ideology....  If it were about ideology, Trump would be a distant memory....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70735</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70735</guid>
		<description>@nypoet22 [11]

So Republican voters have three options?

1. Vote for the Democrat middle class policies by voting Democratic

2. Vote for a raise for their boss and some over-the-pants rubbing on social issues by voting Republican

3. Vote for Trump

You can see why Trump is doing well with the Republican voters, but do the rest need to vote for a clown to get Democratic policies, or can they get the same thing with Hillary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nypoet22 [11]</p>
<p>So Republican voters have three options?</p>
<p>1. Vote for the Democrat middle class policies by voting Democratic</p>
<p>2. Vote for a raise for their boss and some over-the-pants rubbing on social issues by voting Republican</p>
<p>3. Vote for Trump</p>
<p>You can see why Trump is doing well with the Republican voters, but do the rest need to vote for a clown to get Democratic policies, or can they get the same thing with Hillary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70734</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70734</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But I do caution that both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders should at least be thinking about how they&#039;re going to take Trump on&lt;/i&gt;

Really?  Sanders is in a position to look past Super Tuesday for anything but retirement?  I think he needed to win Nevada, to be able to make it past the near-triple-digit loss he&#039;s headed for in South Carolina.

&lt;i&gt;He&#039;s bringing a lot of new voters into the process. A lot of Republicans are voting, and a lot of them are first-time voters voting for Trump. &lt;/i&gt;

This.  He&#039;s going to have coattails.  The country is hosed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But I do caution that both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders should at least be thinking about how they're going to take Trump on</i></p>
<p>Really?  Sanders is in a position to look past Super Tuesday for anything but retirement?  I think he needed to win Nevada, to be able to make it past the near-triple-digit loss he's headed for in South Carolina.</p>
<p><i>He's bringing a lot of new voters into the process. A lot of Republicans are voting, and a lot of them are first-time voters voting for Trump. </i></p>
<p>This.  He's going to have coattails.  The country is hosed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70733</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70733</guid>
		<description>as always, trump is doing what&#039;s best for trump. but people don&#039;t really care about that. jeb lund wrote a great piece for the guardian that rings true about the reasons for trump&#039;s success.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/24/donald-trump-victory-nevada-caucus-voter-anger

&lt;b&gt;&quot;There are millions of miserable people in America who know exactly who engineered the shattering of their worlds, and Trump isn’t one of those people – and, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, everyone else in the field is running on the basis of their experience being one of those people.

&quot;When you are abused and bullied enough, anyone willing to beat up or burn down whomever put you in that position is your friend. Even a bully can be a hero if he targets others bullies – and that is, more or less, what Trump has done since day one.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as always, trump is doing what's best for trump. but people don't really care about that. jeb lund wrote a great piece for the guardian that rings true about the reasons for trump's success.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/24/donald-trump-victory-nevada-caucus-voter-anger" rel="nofollow">http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/24/donald-trump-victory-nevada-caucus-voter-anger</a></p>
<p><b>"There are millions of miserable people in America who know exactly who engineered the shattering of their worlds, and Trump isn’t one of those people – and, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, everyone else in the field is running on the basis of their experience being one of those people.</p>
<p>"When you are abused and bullied enough, anyone willing to beat up or burn down whomever put you in that position is your friend. Even a bully can be a hero if he targets others bullies – and that is, more or less, what Trump has done since day one."</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70732</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70732</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s becoming pretty clear that Rubio has lost the battle of perceptions, with Republican voters, and with pundits and press.  Rubio desperately needs to win something, somewhere, and quickly.  A debate might help a bit, but Rubio hasn&#039;t performed well in debate.

Rubio has collapsed.  The Republican establishment has collapsed!  The Tea Party has collapsed!  Even Jesus has collapsed, the Evangelicals are deserting him for him for Trump!  OK, sorry, so very sorry, technically speaking the Evangelicals are deserting Cruz, but Cruz was supposed to be Christ&#039;s legate on Earth, or at least in the Bible Belt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's becoming pretty clear that Rubio has lost the battle of perceptions, with Republican voters, and with pundits and press.  Rubio desperately needs to win something, somewhere, and quickly.  A debate might help a bit, but Rubio hasn't performed well in debate.</p>
<p>Rubio has collapsed.  The Republican establishment has collapsed!  The Tea Party has collapsed!  Even Jesus has collapsed, the Evangelicals are deserting him for him for Trump!  OK, sorry, so very sorry, technically speaking the Evangelicals are deserting Cruz, but Cruz was supposed to be Christ's legate on Earth, or at least in the Bible Belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70731</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70731</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; What could Trump say that would destroy his chances???&lt;/i&gt;

Funny you should ask Michale, because a Republican blogger has been asking the same question and came up with a list:

“The Confederate Flag is a symbol of racist oppression.”

“Police violence against young black men is a national disgrace.”

“I’m worried that America no longer attracts immigrants from Mexico.”

“Those jobs aren’t coming back.”

“I’ll have a Venti half-caff soy-milk latte with caramel drizzle, three shots.”

“NASCAR isn’t a real sport.”

“Kanye West is a real mensch.”

“I love my Prius.”

“The number of veterans joining white supremacist militias is a legitimate concern.”

“This isn’t a purse, it’s a man-bag.”

“You know who was a great President? Jimmy Carter.”

“The most dangerous threat facing America is climate change.”

“This calf injury gives me trouble in down-dog.”

“I promise that my running-mate will be Jewish.”

“Nashville is for sell-outs.”

“What’s with all these gun nuts?”

“Everybody knows that Obama is a Christian born in Hawaii.”

“Guys who drive pickup trucks are losers, really sad.”

“It’s ‘their,’ not ‘they’re,’ you illiterate troll.”

“You can’t call it a taco if it’s not in a corn tortilla.”

“Never trust people who Tweet in ALLCAPS.”

“I apologize.”

https://goplifer.com/2016/02/20/gaffes-that-would-ruin-trump/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> What could Trump say that would destroy his chances???</i></p>
<p>Funny you should ask Michale, because a Republican blogger has been asking the same question and came up with a list:</p>
<p>“The Confederate Flag is a symbol of racist oppression.”</p>
<p>“Police violence against young black men is a national disgrace.”</p>
<p>“I’m worried that America no longer attracts immigrants from Mexico.”</p>
<p>“Those jobs aren’t coming back.”</p>
<p>“I’ll have a Venti half-caff soy-milk latte with caramel drizzle, three shots.”</p>
<p>“NASCAR isn’t a real sport.”</p>
<p>“Kanye West is a real mensch.”</p>
<p>“I love my Prius.”</p>
<p>“The number of veterans joining white supremacist militias is a legitimate concern.”</p>
<p>“This isn’t a purse, it’s a man-bag.”</p>
<p>“You know who was a great President? Jimmy Carter.”</p>
<p>“The most dangerous threat facing America is climate change.”</p>
<p>“This calf injury gives me trouble in down-dog.”</p>
<p>“I promise that my running-mate will be Jewish.”</p>
<p>“Nashville is for sell-outs.”</p>
<p>“What’s with all these gun nuts?”</p>
<p>“Everybody knows that Obama is a Christian born in Hawaii.”</p>
<p>“Guys who drive pickup trucks are losers, really sad.”</p>
<p>“It’s ‘their,’ not ‘they’re,’ you illiterate troll.”</p>
<p>“You can’t call it a taco if it’s not in a corn tortilla.”</p>
<p>“Never trust people who Tweet in ALLCAPS.”</p>
<p>“I apologize.”</p>
<p><a href="https://goplifer.com/2016/02/20/gaffes-that-would-ruin-trump/" rel="nofollow">https://goplifer.com/2016/02/20/gaffes-that-would-ruin-trump/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70727</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70727</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Republican Race Puts Donald Trump and Paul Ryan on Collision Course&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/25/us/politics/republican-race-puts-paul-ryan-and-donald-trump-on-collision-course.html?_r=0

Reading this article, something hit me ever so subtly.. At Warp 8...

Ryan is doing what&#039;s best for the Republican Party...

Trump is doing what&#039;s best for the country and her people...

Ryan better get his shit together..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Republican Race Puts Donald Trump and Paul Ryan on Collision Course</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/25/us/politics/republican-race-puts-paul-ryan-and-donald-trump-on-collision-course.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/25/us/politics/republican-race-puts-paul-ryan-and-donald-trump-on-collision-course.html?_r=0</a></p>
<p>Reading this article, something hit me ever so subtly.. At Warp 8...</p>
<p>Ryan is doing what's best for the Republican Party...</p>
<p>Trump is doing what's best for the country and her people...</p>
<p>Ryan better get his shit together..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70724</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70724</guid>
		<description>The best endorsement of Trump to date..

China doesn&#039;t want Trump as POTUS..

That&#039;s the BEST reason to elect him..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best endorsement of Trump to date..</p>
<p>China doesn't want Trump as POTUS..</p>
<p>That's the BEST reason to elect him..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70723</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70723</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; (starting with his campaign announcement, where he called Mexican immigrants &quot;rapists&quot; and &quot;murderers&quot;)&lt;/I&gt;

No he did not.. He referred to ILLEGAL mexican immigrants are rapists and murderers..

&lt;I&gt; They watch the wreckage of the establishment Republicans with amusement, confident that their nominee will handily defeat Donald Trump in November. To think any differently is to spit in the face of conventional political wisdom, after all. Except for one big thing they haven&#039;t even started to come to grips with yet: Donald Trump has gotten to where he is by continually spitting in the face of conventional political wisdom. It&#039;s what he does, and he&#039;s very good at it.&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;DING, DING, DING, DING..  WE HAVE A WINNER!!  TELL HIM WHAT HE&#039;S WON, JOHNNY!!!&lt;/B&gt;

GOP Candidate Donald Trump is the Democrat Party&#039;s worst nightmare...

&lt;I&gt;But watching Trump blow away expectation after expectation in the primaries should really make Democrats to think twice about how easy it&#039;ll be to beat him in the general election. &lt;/I&gt;

And THAT has been my point since nearly day one...

&lt;I&gt; Even if Trump becomes the nominee, it&#039;s still possible he will say something so outrageous (perhaps in a one-on-one debate with Hillary?) that he drives away the independent voters who usually provide the winning margin in presidential contests. It&#039;s certainly a possibility, and if it comes to pass it&#039;ll be cause for much amusement on the Democratic side. &lt;/I&gt;

But, you have to ask yourself.

What EXACTLY would that be??  What could Trump say that would destroy his chances???

&lt;I&gt;If Trump bombs in the general election race, Republicans won&#039;t have any &quot;Plan B&quot; to fall back on -- they&#039;ll be stuck with him.&lt;/I&gt;

Just as, if Hillary is indicted during the General Election race, Democrats won&#039;t have &quot;Plan B&quot; to fall back on.  They&#039;ll be stuck with her...

&lt;I&gt; Likewise, the firm belief that beating Trump will be a cakewalk for either Hillary or Bernie is also starting to look a little naive. It&#039;s just another version of the most-recent bad prediction -- the one that just got thrown on the rubbish heap of wrong Trump predictions. &quot;Trump has a ceiling -- he&#039;ll never go above it&quot; is really what Democrats are telling themselves now, regarding the general election. It&#039;s comfortable to think so, but Democrats should also not rely on it as being inevitable. So far, everything Trump has done has defied such expectations, so it would be risky to just assume this one will come true in November.&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly..  It&#039;s as I have been saying all along..

The Democrat Party (and the Republican Party incidentally) has been wrong about Trump at EVERY turn...

What makes them think that their General Election predictions will be right???

Excellent commentary, CW!!  Couldn&#039;t have said it better myself.. :D

Michale

(crossposted to HuffPoo)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> (starting with his campaign announcement, where he called Mexican immigrants "rapists" and "murderers")</i></p>
<p>No he did not.. He referred to ILLEGAL mexican immigrants are rapists and murderers..</p>
<p><i> They watch the wreckage of the establishment Republicans with amusement, confident that their nominee will handily defeat Donald Trump in November. To think any differently is to spit in the face of conventional political wisdom, after all. Except for one big thing they haven't even started to come to grips with yet: Donald Trump has gotten to where he is by continually spitting in the face of conventional political wisdom. It's what he does, and he's very good at it.</i></p>
<p><b>DING, DING, DING, DING..  WE HAVE A WINNER!!  TELL HIM WHAT HE'S WON, JOHNNY!!!</b></p>
<p>GOP Candidate Donald Trump is the Democrat Party's worst nightmare...</p>
<p><i>But watching Trump blow away expectation after expectation in the primaries should really make Democrats to think twice about how easy it'll be to beat him in the general election. </i></p>
<p>And THAT has been my point since nearly day one...</p>
<p><i> Even if Trump becomes the nominee, it's still possible he will say something so outrageous (perhaps in a one-on-one debate with Hillary?) that he drives away the independent voters who usually provide the winning margin in presidential contests. It's certainly a possibility, and if it comes to pass it'll be cause for much amusement on the Democratic side. </i></p>
<p>But, you have to ask yourself.</p>
<p>What EXACTLY would that be??  What could Trump say that would destroy his chances???</p>
<p><i>If Trump bombs in the general election race, Republicans won't have any "Plan B" to fall back on -- they'll be stuck with him.</i></p>
<p>Just as, if Hillary is indicted during the General Election race, Democrats won't have "Plan B" to fall back on.  They'll be stuck with her...</p>
<p><i> Likewise, the firm belief that beating Trump will be a cakewalk for either Hillary or Bernie is also starting to look a little naive. It's just another version of the most-recent bad prediction -- the one that just got thrown on the rubbish heap of wrong Trump predictions. "Trump has a ceiling -- he'll never go above it" is really what Democrats are telling themselves now, regarding the general election. It's comfortable to think so, but Democrats should also not rely on it as being inevitable. So far, everything Trump has done has defied such expectations, so it would be risky to just assume this one will come true in November.</i></p>
<p>Exactly..  It's as I have been saying all along..</p>
<p>The Democrat Party (and the Republican Party incidentally) has been wrong about Trump at EVERY turn...</p>
<p>What makes them think that their General Election predictions will be right???</p>
<p>Excellent commentary, CW!!  Couldn't have said it better myself.. :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
<p>(crossposted to HuffPoo)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speak2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70719</link>
		<dc:creator>Speak2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70719</guid>
		<description>Hmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speak2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70718</link>
		<dc:creator>Speak2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70718</guid>
		<description>&quot;has&quot; not &quot;have&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"has" not "have"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speak2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70717</link>
		<dc:creator>Speak2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70717</guid>
		<description>Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Mitt Romney, John McCain. They all balked about releasing their family&#039;s tax return. Clinton completely caved after a month of negative press. The other three gave material but not with complete and full transparency (they all did partial-type things).

Those three have another thing in common. None of them have ever been addressed as &quot;Mr. President.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Mitt Romney, John McCain. They all balked about releasing their family's tax return. Clinton completely caved after a month of negative press. The other three gave material but not with complete and full transparency (they all did partial-type things).</p>
<p>Those three have another thing in common. None of them have ever been addressed as "Mr. President."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70716</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70716</guid>
		<description>John From Censornati -

You know, I wondered if anyone else noticed that Mittens is now doing exactly what Reid did to him.  Guess it&#039;s OK now... he sure did whine about it back then, though, didn&#039;t he?

Heh.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John From Censornati -</p>
<p>You know, I wondered if anyone else noticed that Mittens is now doing exactly what Reid did to him.  Guess it's OK now... he sure did whine about it back then, though, didn't he?</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70715</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70715</guid>
		<description>Who are these people commonly referred to as The Establishment? Is it Wile E Coyote? Did they think that it was a good plan to have robotic weirdo Willard Rmoney go all Harry Reid on Trump or was he free-lancing? No need for all that drama. Hire whoever snuffed Nino to put a little arsenic in the Donald&#039;s Big Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are these people commonly referred to as The Establishment? Is it Wile E Coyote? Did they think that it was a good plan to have robotic weirdo Willard Rmoney go all Harry Reid on Trump or was he free-lancing? No need for all that drama. Hire whoever snuffed Nino to put a little arsenic in the Donald's Big Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/24/beating-trump-not-so-easy/#comment-70714</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11870#comment-70714</guid>
		<description>The woman cherisher has promised his beloved Poorly Educated Mob that they won&#039;t have to push one for Spanish anymore, he&#039;ll never ever kill a reporter, he&#039;ll make those flunkies at Starbucks say merry christmas, and he&#039;s going to shave HilRod&#039;s head in public. What&#039;s not to like about this platform? It was inevitable that Casino Nation would elect the Casino Bankruptcy King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The woman cherisher has promised his beloved Poorly Educated Mob that they won't have to push one for Spanish anymore, he'll never ever kill a reporter, he'll make those flunkies at Starbucks say merry christmas, and he's going to shave HilRod's head in public. What's not to like about this platform? It was inevitable that Casino Nation would elect the Casino Bankruptcy King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
