<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My 2015 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 04:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68219</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68219</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What were we talkin&#039; &#039;bout now??&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

political correctness? i suggest we take it to a more recent thread.

JL

&lt;b&gt;“Gentlemen, you can&#039;t fight in here! This is the War Room!” 
~dr. strangelove or: how i learned to stop worrying and love the bomb
&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What were we talkin' 'bout now??"</i></p>
<p>political correctness? i suggest we take it to a more recent thread.</p>
<p>JL</p>
<p><b>“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!”<br />
~dr. strangelove or: how i learned to stop worrying and love the bomb<br />
</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68197</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68197</guid>
		<description>Thank you...  That clears it up...  

&lt;B&gt;What were we talkin&#039; &#039;bout now??&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Chicken Little

:D

Michale
664</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you...  That clears it up...  </p>
<p><b>What were we talkin' 'bout now??"</b><br />
-Chicken Little</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
664</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68189</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68189</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In other words, ya got nuttin... :D&lt;/i&gt;

@michale,

i got lots, just little time.

the group that understands a code word will depend in each case on the word and the context. and not all code words are politically charged (another difference between code words and dog whistles). it&#039;s become common to blur the lines between the two (and they are often swapped incorrectly), but they are distinct from each other. 

example 1: if i say the GOP nomination situation is charlie foxtrot, you and anyone else in the military or law enforcement know exactly what i mean, but to most people it&#039;s gibberish. that&#039;s what makes it a code word. some know, others don&#039;t.

if i say the GOP nominees favor &quot;states&#039; rights,&quot; most people will accept the surface meaning of less federal involvement in regional issues - but the far left and far right will think that means the nominees will do so as a means to support covert racism. that&#039;s a dog whistle.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In other words, ya got nuttin... :D</i></p>
<p>@michale,</p>
<p>i got lots, just little time.</p>
<p>the group that understands a code word will depend in each case on the word and the context. and not all code words are politically charged (another difference between code words and dog whistles). it's become common to blur the lines between the two (and they are often swapped incorrectly), but they are distinct from each other. </p>
<p>example 1: if i say the GOP nomination situation is charlie foxtrot, you and anyone else in the military or law enforcement know exactly what i mean, but to most people it's gibberish. that's what makes it a code word. some know, others don't.</p>
<p>if i say the GOP nominees favor "states' rights," most people will accept the surface meaning of less federal involvement in regional issues - but the far left and far right will think that means the nominees will do so as a means to support covert racism. that's a dog whistle.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68179</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68179</guid>
		<description>What I was getting at, Joshua is the character of the group that doesn&#039;t get the &quot;code words&quot;...

And, since we&#039;re here, maybe you can characterize the group that DOES understand those &quot;code words&quot;...

Finally, for Extra Credit (get it??  Your a teacher..  &quot;Extra Credit&quot; is an educational term.  get it??  :D) you can touch on the validity of the &quot;code word strategy&quot; AKA Making Up Shit When There Are No Facts To Support The Claim strategy...  :D

Com&#039; on!!  We&#039;ll get me to 800!!!  :D


Michale
657</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I was getting at, Joshua is the character of the group that doesn't get the "code words"...</p>
<p>And, since we're here, maybe you can characterize the group that DOES understand those "code words"...</p>
<p>Finally, for Extra Credit (get it??  Your a teacher..  "Extra Credit" is an educational term.  get it??  :D) you can touch on the validity of the "code word strategy" AKA Making Up Shit When There Are No Facts To Support The Claim strategy...  :D</p>
<p>Com' on!!  We'll get me to 800!!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
657</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68174</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68174</guid>
		<description>In other words, ya got nuttin...  :D


Michale
652</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, ya got nuttin...  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
652</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68170</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 01:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68170</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Now the group that Code Words are meaningless to..

Quantify that group..&lt;/i&gt;

N = [total population] - [population who understand what they mean]

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now the group that Code Words are meaningless to..</p>
<p>Quantify that group..</i></p>
<p>N = [total population] - [population who understand what they mean]</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68154</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68154</guid>
		<description>Trump weak on minorities??

&lt;B&gt;Pundits might point to billionaire Donald Trump’s huge lead in the GOP presidential primary race as being the result of his generally anti-Washington, anti-government, anti-establishment, anti-politically correct attitude.

If so, it’s not just whites who are ticked at the bureaucracy, but minorities too.

Because a new poll, which still has Trump leading the race, shows 40 percent of blacks are lining up behind Trump, as are 45 percent of Hispanics, and even nearly 19 percent of Asians.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/minorities-line-up-behind-donald-trump/#UP1z4GXdwZHJdc6z.99

A poll says otherwise..  :D

Michale
643</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump weak on minorities??</p>
<p><b>Pundits might point to billionaire Donald Trump’s huge lead in the GOP presidential primary race as being the result of his generally anti-Washington, anti-government, anti-establishment, anti-politically correct attitude.</p>
<p>If so, it’s not just whites who are ticked at the bureaucracy, but minorities too.</p>
<p>Because a new poll, which still has Trump leading the race, shows 40 percent of blacks are lining up behind Trump, as are 45 percent of Hispanics, and even nearly 19 percent of Asians.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/minorities-line-up-behind-donald-trump/#UP1z4GXdwZHJdc6z.99" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/minorities-line-up-behind-donald-trump/#UP1z4GXdwZHJdc6z.99</a></p>
<p>A poll says otherwise..  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
643</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68152</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68152</guid>
		<description>For the record, I was a little more polite in the SLATE comments..  :D

Michale
641</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I was a little more polite in the SLATE comments..  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
641</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68150</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68150</guid>
		<description>Sometimes ignorance just really REALLY pisses me off!!  

&lt;B&gt;Tamir Rice&#039;s Death Resulted From &quot;Officer-Created Jeopardy.&quot; So Why Were No Officers Indicted?

McGinty’s office made the case for the non-indictment during an extended press conference this afternoon. But the central concept in the case—the one that it is crucial to understanding the grand jury’s reasoning—was never mentioned. That concept is known in law enforcement circles as “officer-created jeopardy”: situations in which police officers are responsible for needlessly putting themselves in danger, committing an unforced tactical error that makes them vulnerable—and then using deadly force to protect themselves.

Here’s how “officer-created jeopardy” relates to the death of Tamir Rice. As security footage of the shooting shows, Loehmann and Garmback’s car didn’t come to a stop until it was right next to Rice. In fact, the video indicates that the car was still moving when Loehmann opened the passenger side door and jumped out. Faced with a suspect they believed to be armed, in other words, Loehmann and Garmback decided to drive right up to him—thereby exposing themselves to the possibility that Rice could open fire on them with almost no warning.

The question the grand jurors had to answer, then, was whether to take that decision into account when determining the legality of the officers’ actions. Did it matter that no one forced Loehmann and Garmback to approach their suspect so aggressively? Did it matter that, by approaching him the way they did, they were the ones who had created the situation in which it then became necessary, in Loehmann’s view at least, to use deadly force?&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/12/28/tamir_rice_s_death_didn_t_lead_to_indictments_because_of_supreme_court_vagueness.html

Moron!

Stick to rag writing...

Obviously you are completely and UTTERLY clueless about police tactics and training..

Michale
640</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes ignorance just really REALLY pisses me off!!  </p>
<p><b>Tamir Rice's Death Resulted From "Officer-Created Jeopardy." So Why Were No Officers Indicted?</p>
<p>McGinty’s office made the case for the non-indictment during an extended press conference this afternoon. But the central concept in the case—the one that it is crucial to understanding the grand jury’s reasoning—was never mentioned. That concept is known in law enforcement circles as “officer-created jeopardy”: situations in which police officers are responsible for needlessly putting themselves in danger, committing an unforced tactical error that makes them vulnerable—and then using deadly force to protect themselves.</p>
<p>Here’s how “officer-created jeopardy” relates to the death of Tamir Rice. As security footage of the shooting shows, Loehmann and Garmback’s car didn’t come to a stop until it was right next to Rice. In fact, the video indicates that the car was still moving when Loehmann opened the passenger side door and jumped out. Faced with a suspect they believed to be armed, in other words, Loehmann and Garmback decided to drive right up to him—thereby exposing themselves to the possibility that Rice could open fire on them with almost no warning.</p>
<p>The question the grand jurors had to answer, then, was whether to take that decision into account when determining the legality of the officers’ actions. Did it matter that no one forced Loehmann and Garmback to approach their suspect so aggressively? Did it matter that, by approaching him the way they did, they were the ones who had created the situation in which it then became necessary, in Loehmann’s view at least, to use deadly force?</b><br />
<a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/12/28/tamir_rice_s_death_didn_t_lead_to_indictments_because_of_supreme_court_vagueness.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/12/28/tamir_rice_s_death_didn_t_lead_to_indictments_because_of_supreme_court_vagueness.html</a></p>
<p>Moron!</p>
<p>Stick to rag writing...</p>
<p>Obviously you are completely and UTTERLY clueless about police tactics and training..</p>
<p>Michale<br />
640</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68148</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68148</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;having been presented a demonstration that the three are distinct phenomena, the choice you presented does not logically follow.&lt;/I&gt;

But they ALL share a commonality in that they are, generally speaking, all ideologically based...

In other words, they are a tool of the ideological fanatic, which was my central initial point...

Having said that, I grant that &quot;Political Correctness&quot; doesn&#039;t really belong COMPLETELY in that group, as &quot;Political Correctness&quot; is for the most part a sole malady of the Left Wingery...

Michale
638</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>having been presented a demonstration that the three are distinct phenomena, the choice you presented does not logically follow.</i></p>
<p>But they ALL share a commonality in that they are, generally speaking, all ideologically based...</p>
<p>In other words, they are a tool of the ideological fanatic, which was my central initial point...</p>
<p>Having said that, I grant that "Political Correctness" doesn't really belong COMPLETELY in that group, as "Political Correctness" is for the most part a sole malady of the Left Wingery...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
638</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68146</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68146</guid>
		<description>http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/28/donald-trump-takes-on-bill-clintons-behavior-toward-women/

What I tell ya??

Bringing Bubba into the campaign was a BIG mistake..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Big mistake.. BIG... HUGE...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Julia Roberts, PRETTY WOMAN

What I don&#039;t understand is Hillary *HAD* to know that Trump would go there...

The only thing that makes any kind of sense is Hillary thought she might be able to play the victim card..

The problem with that theory is that the ONLY people who will respond to Hillary The Victim are the people who are already drinking the Hillary kool-aid...

Hillary has underestimated the depth of hatred that Joe and Jane Sixpack has for Hillary Clinton..

Hillary playing the victim is going to backfire and will give us President Trump

You read it here first..

Michale
636</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/28/donald-trump-takes-on-bill-clintons-behavior-toward-women/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/28/donald-trump-takes-on-bill-clintons-behavior-toward-women/</a></p>
<p>What I tell ya??</p>
<p>Bringing Bubba into the campaign was a BIG mistake..</p>
<p><b>"Big mistake.. BIG... HUGE..."</b><br />
-Julia Roberts, PRETTY WOMAN</p>
<p>What I don't understand is Hillary *HAD* to know that Trump would go there...</p>
<p>The only thing that makes any kind of sense is Hillary thought she might be able to play the victim card..</p>
<p>The problem with that theory is that the ONLY people who will respond to Hillary The Victim are the people who are already drinking the Hillary kool-aid...</p>
<p>Hillary has underestimated the depth of hatred that Joe and Jane Sixpack has for Hillary Clinton..</p>
<p>Hillary playing the victim is going to backfire and will give us President Trump</p>
<p>You read it here first..</p>
<p>Michale<br />
636</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68145</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68145</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Meaningless to some, meaningful to others&lt;/I&gt;

OK, OK....  Now, we&#039;re getting somewhere...

Now the group that Code Words are meaningless to..

Quantify that group..

Michale
635</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Meaningless to some, meaningful to others</i></p>
<p>OK, OK....  Now, we're getting somewhere...</p>
<p>Now the group that Code Words are meaningless to..</p>
<p>Quantify that group..</p>
<p>Michale<br />
635</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68140</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68140</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d use a venn diagram, but someone already put the cool ones together:

http://mentalfloss.com/article/61102/12-funny-and-delicious-venn-diagrams

JLJLJL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i'd use a venn diagram, but someone already put the cool ones together:</p>
<p><a href="http://mentalfloss.com/article/61102/12-funny-and-delicious-venn-diagrams" rel="nofollow">http://mentalfloss.com/article/61102/12-funny-and-delicious-venn-diagrams</a></p>
<p>JLJLJL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68139</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68139</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Code Word = no general meaning, encoded meaning known by some

But it&#039;s nice to hear you concede that &quot;code words&quot; are meaningless...&lt;/i&gt; 

Meaningless to some, meaningful to others (as distinguished from dog whistles (meaningful to all, especially meaningful to some). are you aware that you picked off a piece of my definition and presented it as the entirety (and a concession of some sort)?

JL

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Code Word = no general meaning, encoded meaning known by some</p>
<p>But it's nice to hear you concede that "code words" are meaningless...</i> </p>
<p>Meaningless to some, meaningful to others (as distinguished from dog whistles (meaningful to all, especially meaningful to some). are you aware that you picked off a piece of my definition and presented it as the entirety (and a concession of some sort)?</p>
<p>JL</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68138</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68138</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No.... What I mean is that ya&#039;all have two choices..&lt;/i&gt;

Well, that&#039;s not what you wrote. What you wrote was:

&quot;Dog Whistles = Code Words = Political Correctness&quot;

having been presented a demonstration that the three are distinct phenomena, the choice you presented does not logically follow.

JL

&lt;b&gt;It is impossible to say just what I mean! 
But as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen: 
Would it have been worth while 
If one, settling a pillow or throwing off a shawl, 
And turning toward the window, should say: 
  &quot;That is not it at all, 
  That is not what I meant, at all.&quot;  
~TS Eliot, from &#039;The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock&#039;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No.... What I mean is that ya'all have two choices..</i></p>
<p>Well, that's not what you wrote. What you wrote was:</p>
<p>"Dog Whistles = Code Words = Political Correctness"</p>
<p>having been presented a demonstration that the three are distinct phenomena, the choice you presented does not logically follow.</p>
<p>JL</p>
<p><b>It is impossible to say just what I mean!<br />
But as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen:<br />
Would it have been worth while<br />
If one, settling a pillow or throwing off a shawl,<br />
And turning toward the window, should say:<br />
  "That is not it at all,<br />
  That is not what I meant, at all."<br />
~TS Eliot, from 'The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock'</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68137</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68137</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Ahh, now I see. the way you&#039;re describing it, the practice of political correctness is an EXAMPLE of a dog whistle, with the same surface meaning to all but a special meaning that righties get and lefties don&#039;t.&lt;/I&gt;

Huh???

No....  What I mean is that ya&#039;all have two choices..

Either agree that what&#039;s going on in the colleges and universities is political correctness run amok..

OR..

You can concede that what is &quot;politically correct&quot; for one ideological group is nothing more than par-for-the-course ideological attentiveness for a different ideological group......

So, which is it??

Either what&#039;s going on in the colleges and universities is totally whacked out...

Or it&#039;s a shining example of Left Wingery progressivism...

Michale
634</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ahh, now I see. the way you're describing it, the practice of political correctness is an EXAMPLE of a dog whistle, with the same surface meaning to all but a special meaning that righties get and lefties don't.</i></p>
<p>Huh???</p>
<p>No....  What I mean is that ya'all have two choices..</p>
<p>Either agree that what's going on in the colleges and universities is political correctness run amok..</p>
<p>OR..</p>
<p>You can concede that what is "politically correct" for one ideological group is nothing more than par-for-the-course ideological attentiveness for a different ideological group......</p>
<p>So, which is it??</p>
<p>Either what's going on in the colleges and universities is totally whacked out...</p>
<p>Or it's a shining example of Left Wingery progressivism...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
634</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68136</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68136</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What&#039;s going on in the colleges in the here and now is &quot;political correctness run amouk&quot; to the Right Wingery...

To the Left Wingery, it&#039;s just normal natural progressivism....&lt;/i&gt;

@michale,

Ahh, now I see. the way you&#039;re describing it, the practice of political correctness is an EXAMPLE of a dog whistle, with the same surface meaning to all but a special meaning that righties get and lefties don&#039;t.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What's going on in the colleges in the here and now is "political correctness run amouk" to the Right Wingery...</p>
<p>To the Left Wingery, it's just normal natural progressivism....</i></p>
<p>@michale,</p>
<p>Ahh, now I see. the way you're describing it, the practice of political correctness is an EXAMPLE of a dog whistle, with the same surface meaning to all but a special meaning that righties get and lefties don't.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68135</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68135</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Code Word = no general meaning, encoded meaning known by some&lt;/I&gt;

But it&#039;s nice to hear you concede that &quot;code words&quot; are meaningless..  :D

Michale
633</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Code Word = no general meaning, encoded meaning known by some</i></p>
<p>But it's nice to hear you concede that "code words" are meaningless..  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
633</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68134</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68134</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I thought that political correctness involved dispensing with the truth-based-on-facts of a matter, in whole or in part, in order to be kind and, that political incorrectness was being truthful-based-on-facts at the risk of being too blunt for the hypersensitive among us.&lt;/i&gt;

@liz,

that&#039;s also true of political correctness, but for michale&#039;s purpose of comparing it to dog whistles, the commonality is that both have special terms with idiomatic meanings.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I thought that political correctness involved dispensing with the truth-based-on-facts of a matter, in whole or in part, in order to be kind and, that political incorrectness was being truthful-based-on-facts at the risk of being too blunt for the hypersensitive among us.</i></p>
<p>@liz,</p>
<p>that's also true of political correctness, but for michale's purpose of comparing it to dog whistles, the commonality is that both have special terms with idiomatic meanings.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68133</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68133</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; Political correctness has pretty much the same meaning for everybody; &lt;/I&gt;

Not at all..

What&#039;s going on in the colleges in the here and now is &quot;political correctness run amouk&quot; to the Right Wingery...

To the Left Wingery, it&#039;s just normal natural progressivism....

Michale
632</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Political correctness has pretty much the same meaning for everybody; </i></p>
<p>Not at all..</p>
<p>What's going on in the colleges in the here and now is "political correctness run amouk" to the Right Wingery...</p>
<p>To the Left Wingery, it's just normal natural progressivism....</p>
<p>Michale<br />
632</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68132</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68132</guid>
		<description>I thought that political correctness involved dispensing with the truth-based-on-facts of a matter, in whole or in part, in order to be kind and, that political incorrectness was being truthful-based-on-facts at the risk of being too blunt for the hypersensitive among us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that political correctness involved dispensing with the truth-based-on-facts of a matter, in whole or in part, in order to be kind and, that political incorrectness was being truthful-based-on-facts at the risk of being too blunt for the hypersensitive among us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68131</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68131</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Which is what I said in comment #46...
Dog Whistles = Code Words = Political Correctness&lt;/i&gt;

not the case, and here are the differences, in as lay terms as I can manage:

Dog Whistle vs. Political Correctness: Political correctness has pretty much the same meaning for everybody; there&#039;s no confusion about what&#039;s really meant, just a different &quot;approved&quot; term. Unlike political correctness, dog whistles have a different meaning that is obvious to some but not to others.

Dog Whistle vs. Code Word: Code words are meaningful to those in the know but nearly unintelligible out of context to everyone else. Unlike code words, dog whistles are meaningful to everybody, just MORE meaningful to those in the know.

in other words:

Political correctness = encoded meaning known by all

Dog Whistle = general meaning known by all, encoded meaning known by some

Code Word = no general meaning, encoded meaning known by some

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Which is what I said in comment #46...<br />
Dog Whistles = Code Words = Political Correctness</i></p>
<p>not the case, and here are the differences, in as lay terms as I can manage:</p>
<p>Dog Whistle vs. Political Correctness: Political correctness has pretty much the same meaning for everybody; there's no confusion about what's really meant, just a different "approved" term. Unlike political correctness, dog whistles have a different meaning that is obvious to some but not to others.</p>
<p>Dog Whistle vs. Code Word: Code words are meaningful to those in the know but nearly unintelligible out of context to everyone else. Unlike code words, dog whistles are meaningful to everybody, just MORE meaningful to those in the know.</p>
<p>in other words:</p>
<p>Political correctness = encoded meaning known by all</p>
<p>Dog Whistle = general meaning known by all, encoded meaning known by some</p>
<p>Code Word = no general meaning, encoded meaning known by some</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68130</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68130</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;I have neither the time nor the patience to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the very blanket of freedom that I provide and then QUESTIONS the manner in which I provide it. &lt;/I&gt;


Woops... Bad quote...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I have neither the time nor the &lt;I&gt;inclination&lt;/I&gt; to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the very blanket of freedom that I provide and then QUESTIONS the manner in which I provide it..... &lt;/B&gt;

My bust....   :D

Michale
631</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"I have neither the time nor the patience to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the very blanket of freedom that I provide and then QUESTIONS the manner in which I provide it. </i></p>
<p>Woops... Bad quote...</p>
<p><b>"I have neither the time nor the <i>inclination</i> to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the very blanket of freedom that I provide and then QUESTIONS the manner in which I provide it..... </b></p>
<p>My bust....   :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
631</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68129</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68129</guid>
		<description>Yea, all my work machines are upgrades...

And, like you, I figured it was some kind of setting issue that I had neither the time nor the patience to try and figure out..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I have neither the time nor the patience to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the very blanket of freedom that I provide and then QUESTIONS the manner in which I provide it.  I would rather you just said &#039;thank you&#039; and went on your way.  Otherwise I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post.  Either way, I don&#039;t give a DAMN what you think you are entitled to!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Colonel Nathan R Jessup
Commander, Marine Ground Forces
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

:D

That was done completely from memory..  :D  

Michale
630</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, all my work machines are upgrades...</p>
<p>And, like you, I figured it was some kind of setting issue that I had neither the time nor the patience to try and figure out..</p>
<p><b>"I have neither the time nor the patience to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the very blanket of freedom that I provide and then QUESTIONS the manner in which I provide it.  I would rather you just said 'thank you' and went on your way.  Otherwise I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post.  Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think you are entitled to!!"</b><br />
-Colonel Nathan R Jessup<br />
Commander, Marine Ground Forces<br />
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>That was done completely from memory..  :D  </p>
<p>Michale<br />
630</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdnewman</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68128</link>
		<dc:creator>rdnewman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68128</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;@Michale [#32]&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Thanx for the recommendation...&lt;/i&gt;

You bet, Michale.  I was cautious at first about using it for everything too, but I soon just let it be primary for all copy/move operations.  Primarily because I like the verification on everything.  Glad its working for you!

&lt;i&gt;The weird thing is that the Win10 Copy/Paste issue is only affecting one of my work workstations.. My home machine and the front counter machine at work seems to C/P just fine..&lt;/i&gt;

Probably due to one of your accounts not having the usual permissions to one or more key directories.  It&#039;s happened to me more than once (not just Win10) and can be very hard to sleuth out.  I&#039;m usually not patient enough to try anymore (plus hard to trust the system afterwards) so now usually just reinstall O/S (I&#039;m assuming this was an upgraded machine for you, not a clean install).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>@Michale [#32]</i></p>
<p><i>Thanx for the recommendation...</i></p>
<p>You bet, Michale.  I was cautious at first about using it for everything too, but I soon just let it be primary for all copy/move operations.  Primarily because I like the verification on everything.  Glad its working for you!</p>
<p><i>The weird thing is that the Win10 Copy/Paste issue is only affecting one of my work workstations.. My home machine and the front counter machine at work seems to C/P just fine..</i></p>
<p>Probably due to one of your accounts not having the usual permissions to one or more key directories.  It's happened to me more than once (not just Win10) and can be very hard to sleuth out.  I'm usually not patient enough to try anymore (plus hard to trust the system afterwards) so now usually just reinstall O/S (I'm assuming this was an upgraded machine for you, not a clean install).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68127</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68127</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Donald Trump’s bile is a healing balm for spurned Americans
Those who support him now will support him next November, writes Frank Luntz&lt;/B&gt;
https://next.ft.com/content/1b8318aa-a99f-11e5-9700-2b669a5aeb83

The WHY about Donald Trump is infinitely more important than the WHAT...

That&#039;s the point that the Hysterical Left simply does not get..

Michale
629</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Donald Trump’s bile is a healing balm for spurned Americans<br />
Those who support him now will support him next November, writes Frank Luntz</b><br />
<a href="https://next.ft.com/content/1b8318aa-a99f-11e5-9700-2b669a5aeb83" rel="nofollow">https://next.ft.com/content/1b8318aa-a99f-11e5-9700-2b669a5aeb83</a></p>
<p>The WHY about Donald Trump is infinitely more important than the WHAT...</p>
<p>That's the point that the Hysterical Left simply does not get..</p>
<p>Michale<br />
629</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68126</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68126</guid>
		<description>http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2015/12/22/20151217edstc-a_s878x675.jpg?062b78bbca38dae4a54474e1c4018edc73f6c531

Heh....

&lt;B&gt;&quot;It&#039;s funny &#039;cause it&#039;s true&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Homer Simpson

:D

Michale
628</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2015/12/22/20151217edstc-a_s878x675.jpg?062b78bbca38dae4a54474e1c4018edc73f6c531" rel="nofollow">http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2015/12/22/20151217edstc-a_s878x675.jpg?062b78bbca38dae4a54474e1c4018edc73f6c531</a></p>
<p>Heh....</p>
<p><b>"It's funny 'cause it's true"</b><br />
-Homer Simpson</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
628</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68125</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68125</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually ironic when ya think about it..

2 BIG factors that could help stem the tide of gun violence are harsh penalties for gun crimes and preventing the mentally ill from obtaining guns..

But addressing those runs into resistance from the Democrat Party...

So, if one discards the hysteria and actually looks at the FACTS, it&#039;s the DEMOCRAT PARTY that is in the way of  pushing MEANINGFUL laws that would actually help prevent gun violence...

Ya&#039;all just GOTS to love the irony..  :D

I know I do...

Michale
627</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's actually ironic when ya think about it..</p>
<p>2 BIG factors that could help stem the tide of gun violence are harsh penalties for gun crimes and preventing the mentally ill from obtaining guns..</p>
<p>But addressing those runs into resistance from the Democrat Party...</p>
<p>So, if one discards the hysteria and actually looks at the FACTS, it's the DEMOCRAT PARTY that is in the way of  pushing MEANINGFUL laws that would actually help prevent gun violence...</p>
<p>Ya'all just GOTS to love the irony..  :D</p>
<p>I know I do...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
627</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68124</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68124</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;swallowed comments RE: rahm, abridged:

yes, without a viable opposition party, cities are often forced to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.&lt;/I&gt;

Here&#039;s what I don&#039;t get...

Chicago has some of THE most restrictive gun control laws on the planet..

It SHOULD be the model of peaceful utopia, a rainbow of neighbors and friends, holding hands by the campfire and singing KOOM-BYE-YAA to the wee hours of the morning...

What gives?? 

{/sarcasm}

Maybe..... JUST maybe...  Anti-Gun hysteria is NOT the answer to gun violence, eh???

The FACTS would seem to indicate this... No??

Michale
626</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>swallowed comments RE: rahm, abridged:</p>
<p>yes, without a viable opposition party, cities are often forced to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.</i></p>
<p>Here's what I don't get...</p>
<p>Chicago has some of THE most restrictive gun control laws on the planet..</p>
<p>It SHOULD be the model of peaceful utopia, a rainbow of neighbors and friends, holding hands by the campfire and singing KOOM-BYE-YAA to the wee hours of the morning...</p>
<p>What gives?? </p>
<p>{/sarcasm}</p>
<p>Maybe..... JUST maybe...  Anti-Gun hysteria is NOT the answer to gun violence, eh???</p>
<p>The FACTS would seem to indicate this... No??</p>
<p>Michale<br />
626</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68123</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68123</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;We are generous with other people’s money — people who are not even alive today and who have no say in these decisions that they shall pay for. The majority remain committed to government that finances its love and war far into the future with piles of debt that no one can repay.

Not a dime’s worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats

The US Congress has stated over and over that it is just kicking the can further down the road, but that has never stopped them from doing it, no matter which parity is in charge! (Look at the latest Republican budget!) Both parties complain about kicking our national-debt problem further down the road, but they do it anyway. Democrats and Republicans are equally addicted to debt. US citizens who call themselves by either party monicker are part of a generation that wants to party but doesn’t want to pay for the punch. We are a nation drunk on debt.

If you think the economy is in better hands with one party than the other, you are simply addicted to party ideology. Until you give up on the notion that either party attends to anything other than its own self-interest, this nation will never find a truly creative answer.

Both parties are guardians of the status quo and defenders of the wealthy; and neither party has a genuinely creative idea in its collective head. The only difference between Democrats and Republicans economically is what things motivate them to spend other people’s money.

The Welfare party, known as the the Democratic Party, enables its millions of members to feel generous by ordering their grandchildren to pay for the meals given today to hungry families. None of their generosity is paid for by present taxes. Lord knows how those grandchildren will afford to be charitable to the needs of their own generation when they are still footing the bill for the needs of our generation!

We don’t care, of course. If we actually cared, we’d stop kicking the can down the road; but then we’d have to sell the MacMansion to fund our charity, and we are certainly not that charitable … to pay for welfare with our own mansions! Let the children pay! The next generation will just have to suck it up when the bill comes due. That is what our actions say, even though people may wince or even get angry at hearing it. (Anger is denial’s usual defense.)

Republicans, on the other hand, like to pretend they are fiscally conservative; but they have always proposed budget deficits, too, and have repeatedly shown themselves willing to play brinksmanship games with the national credit rating. At one point (August 2011), they triggered what may have become the worst stock-market crash in US history because of their brinksmanship when they arrogantly failed to realize that credit-rating agencies might blink before the Democrats did. If you don’t think it could have been the worst stock-market crash in history, have you considered the fact that it took the world’s largest and most rapidly launched campaign of quantitative easing to spin the market back around?
&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-27/guest-post-has-there-ever-been-more-selfish-generation

&#039;tis sad, &#039;tis true....  
&#039;tis true, &#039;tis sad.....

Michale
625</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>We are generous with other people’s money — people who are not even alive today and who have no say in these decisions that they shall pay for. The majority remain committed to government that finances its love and war far into the future with piles of debt that no one can repay.</p>
<p>Not a dime’s worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats</p>
<p>The US Congress has stated over and over that it is just kicking the can further down the road, but that has never stopped them from doing it, no matter which parity is in charge! (Look at the latest Republican budget!) Both parties complain about kicking our national-debt problem further down the road, but they do it anyway. Democrats and Republicans are equally addicted to debt. US citizens who call themselves by either party monicker are part of a generation that wants to party but doesn’t want to pay for the punch. We are a nation drunk on debt.</p>
<p>If you think the economy is in better hands with one party than the other, you are simply addicted to party ideology. Until you give up on the notion that either party attends to anything other than its own self-interest, this nation will never find a truly creative answer.</p>
<p>Both parties are guardians of the status quo and defenders of the wealthy; and neither party has a genuinely creative idea in its collective head. The only difference between Democrats and Republicans economically is what things motivate them to spend other people’s money.</p>
<p>The Welfare party, known as the the Democratic Party, enables its millions of members to feel generous by ordering their grandchildren to pay for the meals given today to hungry families. None of their generosity is paid for by present taxes. Lord knows how those grandchildren will afford to be charitable to the needs of their own generation when they are still footing the bill for the needs of our generation!</p>
<p>We don’t care, of course. If we actually cared, we’d stop kicking the can down the road; but then we’d have to sell the MacMansion to fund our charity, and we are certainly not that charitable … to pay for welfare with our own mansions! Let the children pay! The next generation will just have to suck it up when the bill comes due. That is what our actions say, even though people may wince or even get angry at hearing it. (Anger is denial’s usual defense.)</p>
<p>Republicans, on the other hand, like to pretend they are fiscally conservative; but they have always proposed budget deficits, too, and have repeatedly shown themselves willing to play brinksmanship games with the national credit rating. At one point (August 2011), they triggered what may have become the worst stock-market crash in US history because of their brinksmanship when they arrogantly failed to realize that credit-rating agencies might blink before the Democrats did. If you don’t think it could have been the worst stock-market crash in history, have you considered the fact that it took the world’s largest and most rapidly launched campaign of quantitative easing to spin the market back around?<br />
</b><br />
<a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-27/guest-post-has-there-ever-been-more-selfish-generation" rel="nofollow">http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-27/guest-post-has-there-ever-been-more-selfish-generation</a></p>
<p>'tis sad, 'tis true....<br />
'tis true, 'tis sad.....</p>
<p>Michale<br />
625</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68122</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68122</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Mall Mayhem: Over 1,000 Teens Shut Down Kentucky Mall&lt;/B&gt;
http://abcnews.go.com/US/mall-mayhem-1000-teens-shut-kentucky-mall/story?id=35963312


Future loyal members of the Democrat Party....  :^/

Michale
624</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Mall Mayhem: Over 1,000 Teens Shut Down Kentucky Mall</b><br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/mall-mayhem-1000-teens-shut-kentucky-mall/story?id=35963312" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/US/mall-mayhem-1000-teens-shut-kentucky-mall/story?id=35963312</a></p>
<p>Future loyal members of the Democrat Party....  :^/</p>
<p>Michale<br />
624</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68121</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68121</guid>
		<description>JL,

&lt;I&gt;once the primary is over, sure. but i doubt the establishment GOP will support trump until and unless they have to.&lt;/I&gt;

Just like establishment DEM didn&#039;t support Obama until they had to...

No matter how many times it is denied, there is really no difference between Democrat politicians and Republican politicians...

The evidence that supports this conclusion is overwhelming..

Michale
623</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JL,</p>
<p><i>once the primary is over, sure. but i doubt the establishment GOP will support trump until and unless they have to.</i></p>
<p>Just like establishment DEM didn't support Obama until they had to...</p>
<p>No matter how many times it is denied, there is really no difference between Democrat politicians and Republican politicians...</p>
<p>The evidence that supports this conclusion is overwhelming..</p>
<p>Michale<br />
623</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68120</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68120</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But, I am constrained to point out that one person&#039;s &quot;dog whistle&quot; is another person&#039;s blaring and obvious...

yes, that&#039;s kinda the definition.&lt;/I&gt;

Which is what I said in comment #46...

Dog Whistles = Code Words = Political Correctness

Michale
622</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But, I am constrained to point out that one person's "dog whistle" is another person's blaring and obvious...</p>
<p>yes, that's kinda the definition.</i></p>
<p>Which is what I said in comment #46...</p>
<p>Dog Whistles = Code Words = Political Correctness</p>
<p>Michale<br />
622</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68118</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 04:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68118</guid>
		<description>Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68117</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 02:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68117</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But, I am constrained to point out that one person&#039;s &quot;dog whistle&quot; is another person&#039;s blaring and obvious...&lt;/i&gt;

yes, that&#039;s kinda the definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But, I am constrained to point out that one person's "dog whistle" is another person's blaring and obvious...</i></p>
<p>yes, that's kinda the definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68116</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68116</guid>
		<description>Michale[50]: 

You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. 

Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like &quot;More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what&#039;s your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?&quot;.

So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. 

And so ... (click thru Michale, you&#039;ll laugh at this one):

www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale[50]: </p>
<p>You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. </p>
<p>Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like "More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what's your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?".</p>
<p>So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. </p>
<p>And so ... (click thru Michale, you'll laugh at this one):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174" rel="nofollow">http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68115</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68115</guid>
		<description>Michale[50]: 

You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. 

Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like &quot;More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what&#039;s your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?&quot;.

So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orang - utan impersonator.

And so ... (click thru Michale, you&#039;ll laugh at this one):

www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale[50]: </p>
<p>You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. </p>
<p>Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like "More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what's your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?".</p>
<p>So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orang - utan impersonator.</p>
<p>And so ... (click thru Michale, you'll laugh at this one):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174" rel="nofollow">http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68114</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68114</guid>
		<description>Michale[50]: 

You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. 

Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like &quot;More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what&#039;s your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?&quot;.

So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orang - utan impersonator.

And so ... (click thru Michale, you&#039;ll laugh at this one):

http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale[50]: </p>
<p>You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. </p>
<p>Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like "More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what's your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?".</p>
<p>So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orang - utan impersonator.</p>
<p>And so ... (click thru Michale, you'll laugh at this one):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174" rel="nofollow">http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68113</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68113</guid>
		<description>Michale[50]: 

You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. 

Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like &quot;More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what&#039;s your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?&quot;.

So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orangutan impersonator.

And so ... (click thru Michale, you&#039;ll laugh at this one):

http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale[50]: </p>
<p>You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. </p>
<p>Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like "More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown terrorists, so what's your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?".</p>
<p>So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orangutan impersonator.</p>
<p>And so ... (click thru Michale, you'll laugh at this one):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174" rel="nofollow">http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68112</link>
		<dc:creator>neilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68112</guid>
		<description>Michale[50]: 

You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. 

Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like &quot;More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown nut cases, so what&#039;s your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?&quot;.

So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orangutan impersonator.

And so ... (click thru Michale, you&#039;ll laugh at this one):

http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale[50]: </p>
<p>You are right, there is plenty of unrighteous indignation on MSNBC and Huffpost too. </p>
<p>Scaring the uneducated is not the preserve of any end of the political spectrum. So then we look at the target - there is no point trying to scare or rile up people about Syrian refugees who respond with points like "More people died last year from drowning in a backyard pool than terrorism, and most of the terrorism deaths were caused by home grown nut cases, so what's your beef with some families who are victims of the civil war over there?".</p>
<p>So you target the most poorly educated, who have been given less instruction in the mechanisms of scientific rigor. People who are likely to believe what they hear on TV. Or from an orangutan impersonator.</p>
<p>And so ... (click thru Michale, you'll laugh at this one):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174" rel="nofollow">http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68111</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68111</guid>
		<description>But seriously....

How can ANYONE defend these whiney little brats complaining about the crap they are complaining about...

I mean.. Honestly..

&quot;Safe spaces&quot;???

If these kids can&#039;t face the world without &quot;safe spaces&quot; maybe they should have stayed with mommy and daddy...

Eh???

Michale
621</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But seriously....</p>
<p>How can ANYONE defend these whiney little brats complaining about the crap they are complaining about...</p>
<p>I mean.. Honestly..</p>
<p>"Safe spaces"???</p>
<p>If these kids can't face the world without "safe spaces" maybe they should have stayed with mommy and daddy...</p>
<p>Eh???</p>
<p>Michale<br />
621</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68110</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 23:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68110</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Now we have the Fox News types getting spoon fed unrighteous indignation at the unrighteous indignation pervading campuses. &lt;/I&gt;

As opposed to MSNBC/HuffPoop types getting spoon fed righteous dignation??

You see how that works???

:D

Michale
620</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now we have the Fox News types getting spoon fed unrighteous indignation at the unrighteous indignation pervading campuses. </i></p>
<p>As opposed to MSNBC/HuffPoop types getting spoon fed righteous dignation??</p>
<p>You see how that works???</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
620</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68109</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 23:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68109</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;dog whistles are neither code words nor political correctness; they are terms that everyone understands, but some feel very strongly about. the reason they&#039;re called &quot;dog whistles&quot; is that, like real dog whistles, most folks don&#039;t really understand how strongly some people respond. referring to &quot;illegal immigrants&quot; sounds perfectly rational and legal, but to anti-latino bigots it seems like a politician supports their agenda, regardless of whether or not they actually do.&lt;/I&gt;

&quot;dog whistles&quot; are different things to different people, depending on their political ideology..

As such, they are EXACTLY like code words and political correctness...  :D

Seriously, I get what you are trying to say...

But, I am constrained to point out that one person&#039;s &quot;dog whistle&quot; is another person&#039;s blaring and obvious... 

Michale
619</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>dog whistles are neither code words nor political correctness; they are terms that everyone understands, but some feel very strongly about. the reason they're called "dog whistles" is that, like real dog whistles, most folks don't really understand how strongly some people respond. referring to "illegal immigrants" sounds perfectly rational and legal, but to anti-latino bigots it seems like a politician supports their agenda, regardless of whether or not they actually do.</i></p>
<p>"dog whistles" are different things to different people, depending on their political ideology..</p>
<p>As such, they are EXACTLY like code words and political correctness...  :D</p>
<p>Seriously, I get what you are trying to say...</p>
<p>But, I am constrained to point out that one person's "dog whistle" is another person's blaring and obvious... </p>
<p>Michale<br />
619</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68108</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68108</guid>
		<description>@michale,

dog whistles are neither code words nor political correctness; they are terms that everyone understands, but some feel very strongly about. the reason they&#039;re called &quot;dog whistles&quot; is that, like real dog whistles, most folks don&#039;t really understand how strongly some people respond. referring to &quot;illegal immigrants&quot; sounds perfectly rational and legal, but to anti-latino bigots it seems like a politician supports their agenda, regardless of whether or not they actually do.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@michale,</p>
<p>dog whistles are neither code words nor political correctness; they are terms that everyone understands, but some feel very strongly about. the reason they're called "dog whistles" is that, like real dog whistles, most folks don't really understand how strongly some people respond. referring to "illegal immigrants" sounds perfectly rational and legal, but to anti-latino bigots it seems like a politician supports their agenda, regardless of whether or not they actually do.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilmcgovern</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68107</link>
		<dc:creator>neilmcgovern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68107</guid>
		<description>Dog whistles and political correctness are not the same thing, but they are different points in the same progression.

Outright Bigotry + Righteous indignation -&gt;
PC + Dog Whistles -&gt;
General acceptance + Unrighteous indignation.

Dog whistles provide plausible deniability and are used when a politician wants to get support from the people who are still outright bigots without generating too much indignation from the educated.

Unrighteous indignation is sweeping our campuses at the moment, as you frequently, and often correctly point out Michale.

Now we have the Fox News types getting spoon fed unrighteous indignation at the unrighteous indignation pervading campuses. This is all blown totally out of proportion on both sides because people have discovered how much fun being indignant is, and how many eyeballs it can sell.

Add Donald Trump to this mess and we have a sad but compelling story line unfolding in front of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dog whistles and political correctness are not the same thing, but they are different points in the same progression.</p>
<p>Outright Bigotry + Righteous indignation -&gt;<br />
PC + Dog Whistles -&gt;<br />
General acceptance + Unrighteous indignation.</p>
<p>Dog whistles provide plausible deniability and are used when a politician wants to get support from the people who are still outright bigots without generating too much indignation from the educated.</p>
<p>Unrighteous indignation is sweeping our campuses at the moment, as you frequently, and often correctly point out Michale.</p>
<p>Now we have the Fox News types getting spoon fed unrighteous indignation at the unrighteous indignation pervading campuses. This is all blown totally out of proportion on both sides because people have discovered how much fun being indignant is, and how many eyeballs it can sell.</p>
<p>Add Donald Trump to this mess and we have a sad but compelling story line unfolding in front of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68106</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 19:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68106</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;t) to realize why we have dog whistles in our politics and just blurted out his true feelings&lt;/I&gt;

Which explains Trumps popularity amongst the Right and the Independents and many on the Left..

Because ANOTHER name for &quot;dog whistles&quot; is Political Correctness...

And, as has been made readily apparent to EVERYONE with more than 2 brain cells to rub together.......   

Americans are fed up, sick and tired and rebel&#039;ing against Political Correctness...

That&#039;s why Trump is so popular amongst the Right, the Center and the Left...

Michale
619</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>t) to realize why we have dog whistles in our politics and just blurted out his true feelings</i></p>
<p>Which explains Trumps popularity amongst the Right and the Independents and many on the Left..</p>
<p>Because ANOTHER name for "dog whistles" is Political Correctness...</p>
<p>And, as has been made readily apparent to EVERYONE with more than 2 brain cells to rub together.......   </p>
<p>Americans are fed up, sick and tired and rebel'ing against Political Correctness...</p>
<p>That's why Trump is so popular amongst the Right, the Center and the Left...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
619</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68105</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 19:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68105</guid>
		<description>What do I mean by that??

Look up &lt;B&gt;HISPANDERING&lt;/B&gt;

:D

Michale
618</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do I mean by that??</p>
<p>Look up <b>HISPANDERING</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
618</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68104</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 19:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68104</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I think your &#039;legal vs. illegal&#039; position misses the fact that &#039;immigration&#039; is a dog whistle that both the Republican base and the Latino community both understand. Trump was too (stupid/didn&#039;t care/ignorant) to realize why we have dog whistles in our politics and just blurted out his true feelings (I think he will find out why dog whistles are good soon however).&lt;/I&gt;

&quot;Dog whistles&quot;, like &quot;code words&quot; is simply a euphemism for putting out a personal opinion or hope masquerading as a fact...


Michale
617</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I think your 'legal vs. illegal' position misses the fact that 'immigration' is a dog whistle that both the Republican base and the Latino community both understand. Trump was too (stupid/didn't care/ignorant) to realize why we have dog whistles in our politics and just blurted out his true feelings (I think he will find out why dog whistles are good soon however).</i></p>
<p>"Dog whistles", like "code words" is simply a euphemism for putting out a personal opinion or hope masquerading as a fact...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
617</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilmcgovern</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68103</link>
		<dc:creator>neilmcgovern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68103</guid>
		<description>Michale:

re: Bet vs. &#039;HOPE&#039;

Fair enough. Just to make things clear, my bet and my hope is that we get an escalation in Trump vs. Establishment attacks (option 1).

My bet, because I think Frum is right and the establishment are misreading Trump, and my hope because it will amuse me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale:</p>
<p>re: Bet vs. 'HOPE'</p>
<p>Fair enough. Just to make things clear, my bet and my hope is that we get an escalation in Trump vs. Establishment attacks (option 1).</p>
<p>My bet, because I think Frum is right and the establishment are misreading Trump, and my hope because it will amuse me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilmcgovern</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68102</link>
		<dc:creator>neilmcgovern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 18:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68102</guid>
		<description>Michale:

Here are the numbers for Presidential elections since 1980 (source: http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2012/11/2012_Latino_vote_exit_poll_analysis_final_11-07-12.pdf)

--1980 Jimmy Carter, 56% Ronald Reagan, 35% +21
--1984 Walter Mondale, 61% Ronald Reagan, 37% +24
--1988 Michael Dukakis, 69% George H.W. Bush, 30% +39
--1992 Bill Clinton, 61% George H.W. Bush, 25% +36
--1996 Bill Clinton, 72% Bob Dole, 21% +51
--2000 Al Gore, 62% George W. Bush, 35% +27
--2004 John Kerry, 58% George W. Bush, 40% +18
--2008 Barack Obama, 67% John McCain, 31% +36
--2012 Barack Obama, 71% Mitt Romney, 27% +44

Somehow I don&#039;t think that Latinos want more Romney-like candidates, and neither do the Republican base - for opposite reasons (Romney - too anti-immigrant for Latinos, but too weak on immigrant bashing for Republicans).

I think your &#039;legal vs. illegal&#039; position misses the fact that &#039;immigration&#039; is a dog whistle that both the Republican base and the Latino community both understand. Trump was too (stupid/didn&#039;t care/ignorant) to realize why we have dog whistles in our politics and just blurted out his true feelings (I think he will find out why dog whistles are good soon however).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale:</p>
<p>Here are the numbers for Presidential elections since 1980 (source: <a href="http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2012/11/2012_Latino_vote_exit_poll_analysis_final_11-07-12.pdf)" rel="nofollow">http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2012/11/2012_Latino_vote_exit_poll_analysis_final_11-07-12.pdf)</a></p>
<p>--1980 Jimmy Carter, 56% Ronald Reagan, 35% +21<br />
--1984 Walter Mondale, 61% Ronald Reagan, 37% +24<br />
--1988 Michael Dukakis, 69% George H.W. Bush, 30% +39<br />
--1992 Bill Clinton, 61% George H.W. Bush, 25% +36<br />
--1996 Bill Clinton, 72% Bob Dole, 21% +51<br />
--2000 Al Gore, 62% George W. Bush, 35% +27<br />
--2004 John Kerry, 58% George W. Bush, 40% +18<br />
--2008 Barack Obama, 67% John McCain, 31% +36<br />
--2012 Barack Obama, 71% Mitt Romney, 27% +44</p>
<p>Somehow I don't think that Latinos want more Romney-like candidates, and neither do the Republican base - for opposite reasons (Romney - too anti-immigrant for Latinos, but too weak on immigrant bashing for Republicans).</p>
<p>I think your 'legal vs. illegal' position misses the fact that 'immigration' is a dog whistle that both the Republican base and the Latino community both understand. Trump was too (stupid/didn't care/ignorant) to realize why we have dog whistles in our politics and just blurted out his true feelings (I think he will find out why dog whistles are good soon however).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68101</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 18:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68101</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s more likely that 3 will occur as the Republican Establishment will, like Democrats, be more interesting in WINNING than any purity statements..&lt;/i&gt;

once the primary is over, sure. but i doubt the establishment GOP will support trump until and unless they have to.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It's more likely that 3 will occur as the Republican Establishment will, like Democrats, be more interesting in WINNING than any purity statements..</i></p>
<p>once the primary is over, sure. but i doubt the establishment GOP will support trump until and unless they have to.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68100</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68100</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;My bet: 1 - and the entertainment quotient will skyrocket&lt;/I&gt;

Let&#039;s face reality..

That is your HOPE...

It&#039;s more likely that 3 will occur as the Republican Establishment will, like Democrats, be more interesting in WINNING than any purity statements..

Michale
616</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My bet: 1 - and the entertainment quotient will skyrocket</i></p>
<p>Let's face reality..</p>
<p>That is your HOPE...</p>
<p>It's more likely that 3 will occur as the Republican Establishment will, like Democrats, be more interesting in WINNING than any purity statements..</p>
<p>Michale<br />
616</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68099</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68099</guid>
		<description>Neil,

&lt;I5. Pissing off the Latino community regarding immigration: not OK&lt;/I&gt;

The majority of LEGAL immigrants appreciate Trumps push against ILLEGAL immigration..

Further, the Latino community is sick of the Hispandering coming from the Democrat Party...

The Democrat Party is simply trying to expand the plantation...

Hispanics are having none of that...

Michale
615</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>&lt;I5. Pissing off the Latino community regarding immigration: not OK</p>
<p>The majority of LEGAL immigrants appreciate Trumps push against ILLEGAL immigration..</p>
<p>Further, the Latino community is sick of the Hispandering coming from the Democrat Party...</p>
<p>The Democrat Party is simply trying to expand the plantation...</p>
<p>Hispanics are having none of that...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
615</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68098</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68098</guid>
		<description>neil,

i tend to agree with you on all points. the GOP establishment will pick a horse and run it hard against trump. once the field thins a bit more we&#039;ll get a better idea of said candidate&#039;s potential success.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neil,</p>
<p>i tend to agree with you on all points. the GOP establishment will pick a horse and run it hard against trump. once the field thins a bit more we'll get a better idea of said candidate's potential success.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68097</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68097</guid>
		<description>my math was a bit off, actually. upon further research, the last republican mayor of chicago was bill thompson, who won by allying himself with al capone. his last term ended in 1931, so that would make it 84 years, not 87.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my math was a bit off, actually. upon further research, the last republican mayor of chicago was bill thompson, who won by allying himself with al capone. his last term ended in 1931, so that would make it 84 years, not 87.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilmcgovern</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68096</link>
		<dc:creator>neilmcgovern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68096</guid>
		<description>Great article by David Frum in the Atlantic

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/the-great-republican-revolt/419118/

Basically:

Republican Establishment, after the 2012 loss, decided that:
1. Attacks on middle class programs (Medicare, Social Security): Still OK
2. Big tax cuts for the $250K+ crowd: Still OK
3. Lowering inconvenient regulations: Still OK
4. Corporations and the ultra wealthy being able to buy elections: Still OK
5. Pissing off the Latino community regarding immigration: not OK

So they lined up Bush, Rubio, and Walker to run on 1-4 but not 5. The base hated it.

Trump appeared and doubled down on pissing off Latinos on immigration. The base loved it.

Trump also vowed to protect SS and Medicare, and that he didn&#039;t need the oligarch&#039;s money. The base loved it even more.

Trump is a funny clown who humiliates the establishment candidates. Even better for the Republican base!

Watching the establishment vs. Trump is some of the best entertainment of this election season.

How do you think it will play out?

1. Establishment picks a single candidate (probably Rubio) and puts all their money on negative ads aimed at Donald and Cruz - risk is that Trump forms his own party

2. Establishment holds nose and picks Cruz over Trump

3. Establishment makes peace with Trump

4. Other?

My bet: 1 - and the entertainment quotient will skyrocket</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article by David Frum in the Atlantic</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/the-great-republican-revolt/419118/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/the-great-republican-revolt/419118/</a></p>
<p>Basically:</p>
<p>Republican Establishment, after the 2012 loss, decided that:<br />
1. Attacks on middle class programs (Medicare, Social Security): Still OK<br />
2. Big tax cuts for the $250K+ crowd: Still OK<br />
3. Lowering inconvenient regulations: Still OK<br />
4. Corporations and the ultra wealthy being able to buy elections: Still OK<br />
5. Pissing off the Latino community regarding immigration: not OK</p>
<p>So they lined up Bush, Rubio, and Walker to run on 1-4 but not 5. The base hated it.</p>
<p>Trump appeared and doubled down on pissing off Latinos on immigration. The base loved it.</p>
<p>Trump also vowed to protect SS and Medicare, and that he didn't need the oligarch's money. The base loved it even more.</p>
<p>Trump is a funny clown who humiliates the establishment candidates. Even better for the Republican base!</p>
<p>Watching the establishment vs. Trump is some of the best entertainment of this election season.</p>
<p>How do you think it will play out?</p>
<p>1. Establishment picks a single candidate (probably Rubio) and puts all their money on negative ads aimed at Donald and Cruz - risk is that Trump forms his own party</p>
<p>2. Establishment holds nose and picks Cruz over Trump</p>
<p>3. Establishment makes peace with Trump</p>
<p>4. Other?</p>
<p>My bet: 1 - and the entertainment quotient will skyrocket</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68095</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68095</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected..  :D

Michale
614</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected..  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
614</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68094</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68094</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Like Trump??? :D&lt;/i&gt;

if you mean the worst a party has to offer then sure, but trump has never been the mayor of a city (or held any other elected office), and unlike chicago mayors there actually have been a few republican presidents in the last 87 years.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Like Trump??? :D</i></p>
<p>if you mean the worst a party has to offer then sure, but trump has never been the mayor of a city (or held any other elected office), and unlike chicago mayors there actually have been a few republican presidents in the last 87 years.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68093</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68093</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;yes, without a viable opposition party, cities are often forced to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.&lt;/I&gt;

Like Trump???  :D

Michale
613</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>yes, without a viable opposition party, cities are often forced to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.</i></p>
<p>Like Trump???  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
613</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68092</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68092</guid>
		<description>Hay RD,

Referring back to a previous discussion regarding Windows 10, etc etc..

I installed TeraCopy because I couldn&#039;t figure out how to bring back the COPY/PASTE progress window in Win10....

But it looked to me like TeraCopy was a standalone program that I really didn&#039;t want to have to invoke everytime I wanted to copy stuff..  Which is constantly..

I was pleasantly surprised to see that, when I go to copy and paste thru EXPLORER it gives me the option to do it thru EXPLORER or TERACOPY...

Woot!!!  :D

Thanx for the recommendation...

The weird thing is that the Win10 Copy/Paste issue is only affecting one of my work workstations.. My home machine and the front counter machine at work seems to C/P just fine..

Anyways.. Thanx.. :D

Michale
612</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay RD,</p>
<p>Referring back to a previous discussion regarding Windows 10, etc etc..</p>
<p>I installed TeraCopy because I couldn't figure out how to bring back the COPY/PASTE progress window in Win10....</p>
<p>But it looked to me like TeraCopy was a standalone program that I really didn't want to have to invoke everytime I wanted to copy stuff..  Which is constantly..</p>
<p>I was pleasantly surprised to see that, when I go to copy and paste thru EXPLORER it gives me the option to do it thru EXPLORER or TERACOPY...</p>
<p>Woot!!!  :D</p>
<p>Thanx for the recommendation...</p>
<p>The weird thing is that the Win10 Copy/Paste issue is only affecting one of my work workstations.. My home machine and the front counter machine at work seems to C/P just fine..</p>
<p>Anyways.. Thanx.. :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
612</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68091</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68091</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;is there a guideline somewhere to help us figure out why certain comments get flagged for no obvious reason?&lt;/I&gt;

Near as I can tell, there is no set algorithm that indicates what does and does not get sent to NNL...

It&#039;s like the old Star Trek episode, PARADISE SYNDROME...

A certain combination of consonants and vowels triggers the obelisk..

In this case, a certain combination of words invokes the NNL filters..

The NNL filters seems to have a big hangup with URLs... I remember when I couldn&#039;t post a TAYLOR MARSH url to save my life..  :D

I have had a few comments in this thread whisked away.. But I replaced the links with TINYURL links and that made it thru...

Michale
612</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>is there a guideline somewhere to help us figure out why certain comments get flagged for no obvious reason?</i></p>
<p>Near as I can tell, there is no set algorithm that indicates what does and does not get sent to NNL...</p>
<p>It's like the old Star Trek episode, PARADISE SYNDROME...</p>
<p>A certain combination of consonants and vowels triggers the obelisk..</p>
<p>In this case, a certain combination of words invokes the NNL filters..</p>
<p>The NNL filters seems to have a big hangup with URLs... I remember when I couldn't post a TAYLOR MARSH url to save my life..  :D</p>
<p>I have had a few comments in this thread whisked away.. But I replaced the links with TINYURL links and that made it thru...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
612</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68090</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68090</guid>
		<description>swallowed comments RE: rahm, abridged:

yes, without a viable opposition party, cities are often forced to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>swallowed comments RE: rahm, abridged:</p>
<p>yes, without a viable opposition party, cities are often forced to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68089</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68089</guid>
		<description>@cw,

is there a guideline somewhere to help us figure out why certain comments get flagged for no obvious reason?

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cw,</p>
<p>is there a guideline somewhere to help us figure out why certain comments get flagged for no obvious reason?</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68088</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68088</guid>
		<description>comments swallowed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comments swallowed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68087</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68087</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics&lt;/i&gt;

@Michale [25],

yes, the folks at the national review would see chicago&#039;s fiscal situation that way. but as pro-corporate as they are, even george will and co. are fully aware that everybody hates rahm, and with good reason. if you&#039;ve scrolled down to the bottom of the article you linked, you know the next few articles (by jeff blehar, kevin williamson and johah goldberg) are all about what a big opportunity everyone&#039;s disgust for rahm is for republicans. and in truth, perhaps they&#039;re right on that count. without a viable opposition party, cities are often condemned to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics</i></p>
<p>@Michale [25],</p>
<p>yes, the folks at the national review would see chicago's fiscal situation that way. but as pro-corporate as they are, even george will and co. are fully aware that everybody hates rahm, and with good reason. if you've scrolled down to the bottom of the article you linked, you know the next few articles (by jeff blehar, kevin williamson and johah goldberg) are all about what a big opportunity everyone's disgust for rahm is for republicans. and in truth, perhaps they're right on that count. without a viable opposition party, cities are often condemned to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68086</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68086</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics&lt;/i&gt;

yes, the folks at the national review would see chicago&#039;s fiscal situation that way. but as pro-corporate as they are, even george will and co. are fully aware that everybody hates rahm, and with good reason. if you&#039;ve scrolled down to the bottom of the article you linked, you know the next few articles (by jeff blehar, kevin williamson and johah goldberg) are all about what a big opportunity everyone&#039;s disgust for rahm is for republicans. and in truth, perhaps they&#039;re right on that count. without a viable opposition party, cities are often condemned to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics</i></p>
<p>yes, the folks at the national review would see chicago's fiscal situation that way. but as pro-corporate as they are, even george will and co. are fully aware that everybody hates rahm, and with good reason. if you've scrolled down to the bottom of the article you linked, you know the next few articles (by jeff blehar, kevin williamson and johah goldberg) are all about what a big opportunity everyone's disgust for rahm is for republicans. and in truth, perhaps they're right on that count. without a viable opposition party, cities are often condemned to accept the worst political players the dominant party has to offer.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68085</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 11:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68085</guid>
		<description>Com&#039; on!!  Admit it..

Ya&#039;all completely agree with me on these college &quot;snow flakes&quot; who are demanding &quot;safe spaces&quot; and an end to &quot;micro agressions&quot;!!

:D

Michale
611</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Com' on!!  Admit it..</p>
<p>Ya'all completely agree with me on these college "snow flakes" who are demanding "safe spaces" and an end to "micro agressions"!!</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
611</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68084</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68084</guid>
		<description>The Results Of Progressivism... PART DUEX

&lt;B&gt;The Left Has No One to Blame but Itself for Madness on Campus

For several years now, whenever I’ve visited a college campus, I’ve tried to make the following point. It basically goes like this: 

&lt;I&gt;You kids think it is somehow rebellious to be liberal. So let me see if I get this right. The administrators at this school are liberal. The professors are liberal. Your high-school teachers were probably liberal. Your textbooks are, for the most part, liberal. Hollywood is liberal. The music industry is liberal. The fashion industry is liberal. Publishing is liberal. The mainstream media are liberal. Silicon Valley is liberal. Believe it or not, most corporations and the overwhelming majority of charitable foundations are liberal. And yet, you think you’re sticking it to the man by agreeing with them? &lt;/I&gt;

Moreover, it’s been like this for generations. It was true when most of these administrators and faculty were born — they have grown up inside a universe where this fact was simply taken for granted. With the Left given total control of these oases of tolerance and citadels of progressivism, what do we get? 

We get pampered and coddled students screaming that these institutions are hotbeds of racism, homophobia, sexism, and the rest of the 31 Flavors of Oppression.  

I’m sorry, but over here by the hibachi in the parking lot, that’s just frick’n hilarious.&lt;/B&gt;
http://tinyurl.com/z6pqatj

Michale
610</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Results Of Progressivism... PART DUEX</p>
<p><b>The Left Has No One to Blame but Itself for Madness on Campus</p>
<p>For several years now, whenever I’ve visited a college campus, I’ve tried to make the following point. It basically goes like this: </p>
<p><i>You kids think it is somehow rebellious to be liberal. So let me see if I get this right. The administrators at this school are liberal. The professors are liberal. Your high-school teachers were probably liberal. Your textbooks are, for the most part, liberal. Hollywood is liberal. The music industry is liberal. The fashion industry is liberal. Publishing is liberal. The mainstream media are liberal. Silicon Valley is liberal. Believe it or not, most corporations and the overwhelming majority of charitable foundations are liberal. And yet, you think you’re sticking it to the man by agreeing with them? </i></p>
<p>Moreover, it’s been like this for generations. It was true when most of these administrators and faculty were born — they have grown up inside a universe where this fact was simply taken for granted. With the Left given total control of these oases of tolerance and citadels of progressivism, what do we get? </p>
<p>We get pampered and coddled students screaming that these institutions are hotbeds of racism, homophobia, sexism, and the rest of the 31 Flavors of Oppression.  </p>
<p>I’m sorry, but over here by the hibachi in the parking lot, that’s just frick’n hilarious.</b><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/z6pqatj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/z6pqatj</a></p>
<p>Michale<br />
610</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68083</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68083</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Rahm...

&lt;B&gt;In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics&lt;/B&gt;
http://tinyurl.com/nuhc9rj

Rahm and Chicago are simply an obvious product of Progressive policies and politics.......

This is your progressivism at work, people...

Embrace it...

Michale
609</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Rahm...</p>
<p><b>In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics</b><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/nuhc9rj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nuhc9rj</a></p>
<p>Rahm and Chicago are simply an obvious product of Progressive policies and politics.......</p>
<p>This is your progressivism at work, people...</p>
<p>Embrace it...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
609</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68082</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68082</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Rahm...

&lt;B&gt;In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425582/rahm-emanuel-chicago-fiscal-crisis

Rahm and Chicago are simply an obvious product of Progressive policies and politics.......

This is your progressivism at work, people...

Embrace it...

Michale
609</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Rahm...</p>
<p><b>In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel Faces a Crisis Brought on by Progressive Politics</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425582/rahm-emanuel-chicago-fiscal-crisis" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425582/rahm-emanuel-chicago-fiscal-crisis</a></p>
<p>Rahm and Chicago are simply an obvious product of Progressive policies and politics.......</p>
<p>This is your progressivism at work, people...</p>
<p>Embrace it...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
609</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68081</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68081</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Let the desperation begin..&lt;/I&gt;

And WHY is Hillary desperate, you may ask???

&lt;B&gt; Hillary’s Hispandering Problem&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/campaigns-elections/hillary-clinton-hispandering-problem/

Hispanics are not as in the bag for Hillary or Democrats as the Left would want us to believe..

Michale
608</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Let the desperation begin..</i></p>
<p>And WHY is Hillary desperate, you may ask???</p>
<p><b> Hillary’s Hispandering Problem</b><br />
<a href="https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/campaigns-elections/hillary-clinton-hispandering-problem/" rel="nofollow">https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/campaigns-elections/hillary-clinton-hispandering-problem/</a></p>
<p>Hispanics are not as in the bag for Hillary or Democrats as the Left would want us to believe..</p>
<p>Michale<br />
608</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68078</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 07:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68078</guid>
		<description>Remember when I said before that if Hillary deployed Bubba, it would be a sign of desperation in her campaign..

&lt;B&gt;Hillary Clinton’s ‘Secret Weapon’ Could Escalate Campaign Rhetoric&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-secret-weapon-could-escalate-campaign-rhetoric-1451082017

Let the desperation begin..

The problem for Hillary with deploying Bill is that it makes ALL of Bill&#039;s actions, the rape, the sexual assaults, the accusations of pedophilia... Makes that ALL legitimate targets of discussion..

And, since we know that Trump never lets a good insult go to waste....

Grab the popcorn!!  It&#039;s gonna be a great show!!  :D

Michale
607</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when I said before that if Hillary deployed Bubba, it would be a sign of desperation in her campaign..</p>
<p><b>Hillary Clinton’s ‘Secret Weapon’ Could Escalate Campaign Rhetoric</b><br />
<a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-secret-weapon-could-escalate-campaign-rhetoric-1451082017" rel="nofollow">http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-secret-weapon-could-escalate-campaign-rhetoric-1451082017</a></p>
<p>Let the desperation begin..</p>
<p>The problem for Hillary with deploying Bill is that it makes ALL of Bill's actions, the rape, the sexual assaults, the accusations of pedophilia... Makes that ALL legitimate targets of discussion..</p>
<p>And, since we know that Trump never lets a good insult go to waste....</p>
<p>Grab the popcorn!!  It's gonna be a great show!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
607</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68077</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 07:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68077</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The guy who landed the gyrocopter on the Whitehouse lawn is running for Congress against none other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz.&lt;/I&gt;

Couldn&#039;t happen to a more deserving politician..  :D

Michale
606</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The guy who landed the gyrocopter on the Whitehouse lawn is running for Congress against none other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz.</i></p>
<p>Couldn't happen to a more deserving politician..  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
606</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68076</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 07:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68076</guid>
		<description>Hope everyone survived the holiday...

Let&#039;s get back to it, shall we??  :D

Michale
605</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope everyone survived the holiday...</p>
<p>Let's get back to it, shall we??  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
605</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68075</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68075</guid>
		<description>The guy who landed the gyrocopter on the Whitehouse lawn is running for Congress against none other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz. 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-in-capitol-gyrocopter-stunt-to-challenge-dnc-chairwoman/

Thought you&#039;d get a kick out of this, CW. Merry Christmas all! 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy who landed the gyrocopter on the Whitehouse lawn is running for Congress against none other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-in-capitol-gyrocopter-stunt-to-challenge-dnc-chairwoman/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-in-capitol-gyrocopter-stunt-to-challenge-dnc-chairwoman/</a></p>
<p>Thought you'd get a kick out of this, CW. Merry Christmas all! </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilmcgovern</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68074</link>
		<dc:creator>neilmcgovern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 17:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68074</guid>
		<description>Merry Christmas (2015 Chris ;) to everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas (2015 Chris ;) to everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68070</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 03:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68070</guid>
		<description>Chris,

&lt;I&gt;Yeah, I&#039;ll admit to a lot of anti-Rahm bias too. I lost count of the times he went out of his way to insult the base of the voters who elected Obama.&lt;/I&gt;

Still hypersensitive, I see ... about something that didn&#039;t even apply to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p><i>Yeah, I'll admit to a lot of anti-Rahm bias too. I lost count of the times he went out of his way to insult the base of the voters who elected Obama.</i></p>
<p>Still hypersensitive, I see ... about something that didn't even apply to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68065</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 23:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68065</guid>
		<description>OK, nobody noticed it here, but I got red-faced when I read a comment over at HuffPost.

Throughout this article, I typed dozens of times &quot;2016&quot; when I meant &quot;this year.&quot;  I&#039;ve fixed most of them and added a &quot;whoops&quot; notice at the top.

Michale -

I thought the Dave Barry piece was hilarious, read it on WashPost.  Especially his ragging on the Patriots...

nypoet22 -

Yeah, I&#039;ll admit to a lot of anti-Rahm bias too.  I lost count of the times he went out of his way to insult the base of the voters who elected Obama.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, nobody noticed it here, but I got red-faced when I read a comment over at HuffPost.</p>
<p>Throughout this article, I typed dozens of times "2016" when I meant "this year."  I've fixed most of them and added a "whoops" notice at the top.</p>
<p>Michale -</p>
<p>I thought the Dave Barry piece was hilarious, read it on WashPost.  Especially his ragging on the Patriots...</p>
<p>nypoet22 -</p>
<p>Yeah, I'll admit to a lot of anti-Rahm bias too.  I lost count of the times he went out of his way to insult the base of the voters who elected Obama.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68063</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68063</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And such non-brief comments, too, Michale. :)&lt;/I&gt;

Heh  :D


Michale
604</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And such non-brief comments, too, Michale. :)</i></p>
<p>Heh  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
604</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68062</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68062</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;WOW!!! Comment # 600!!! Before Christmas even!!! I think that has GOT to be a new record..Eh Liz??? :D&lt;/I&gt;

And such non-brief comments, too, Michale. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>WOW!!! Comment # 600!!! Before Christmas even!!! I think that has GOT to be a new record..Eh Liz??? :D</i></p>
<p>And such non-brief comments, too, Michale. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68061</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68061</guid>
		<description>http://www.miamiherald.com/living/liv-columns-blogs/dave-barry/article51119880.html

It&#039;s long, but if you don&#039;t laugh at least 5 times, you must be dead...

Or Republican....  :D

Michale
603</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/living/liv-columns-blogs/dave-barry/article51119880.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.miamiherald.com/living/liv-columns-blogs/dave-barry/article51119880.html</a></p>
<p>It's long, but if you don't laugh at least 5 times, you must be dead...</p>
<p>Or Republican....  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
603</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68060</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 18:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68060</guid>
		<description>Santa Claus was good to me today...  :D

http://www.sharpusa.com/ForHome/HomeEntertainment/LCDTV/Archives/LC70LE847U.aspx

Due to the fact that I doubt ANYTHING could get me down, I am going to forgo any snotty or &quot;ignorant prick&quot;-ish comments for 24 hours...   :D

Michale
602</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Santa Claus was good to me today...  :D</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sharpusa.com/ForHome/HomeEntertainment/LCDTV/Archives/LC70LE847U.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.sharpusa.com/ForHome/HomeEntertainment/LCDTV/Archives/LC70LE847U.aspx</a></p>
<p>Due to the fact that I doubt ANYTHING could get me down, I am going to forgo any snotty or "ignorant prick"-ish comments for 24 hours...   :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
602</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68056</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 17:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68056</guid>
		<description>Great rundown Chris!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great rundown Chris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68055</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68055</guid>
		<description>full disclosure: i&#039;m 100% biased against emanuel and have been for years: initially for his 2010 comments about the &quot;professional left,&quot; which is probably part of what got him booted from the obama white house, and many times over for his repeated attempts to privatize chicago&#039;s schools and destroy their teachers&#039; union. long story short, i&#039;m not exactly objective.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>full disclosure: i'm 100% biased against emanuel and have been for years: initially for his 2010 comments about the "professional left," which is probably part of what got him booted from the obama white house, and many times over for his repeated attempts to privatize chicago's schools and destroy their teachers' union. long story short, i'm not exactly objective.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68054</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 17:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68054</guid>
		<description>Rahm Emanuel needs to go away. Now. I applaud Bernie Sanders for distancing himself from Emanuel, and shame on Hillary Clinton for not doing the same.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rahm Emanuel needs to go away. Now. I applaud Bernie Sanders for distancing himself from Emanuel, and shame on Hillary Clinton for not doing the same.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68053</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68053</guid>
		<description>WOW!!!

Comment # 600!!!

Before Christmas even!!!

I think that has GOT to be a new record..

Eh Liz???  :D

Michale
600</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!!</p>
<p>Comment # 600!!!</p>
<p>Before Christmas even!!!</p>
<p>I think that has GOT to be a new record..</p>
<p>Eh Liz???  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
600</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68048</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68048</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;We thought Trump was a joke when he started off too, we fully admit. But we were a little quicker to realize that something was going on even if everyone inside the Beltway had their head buried in the sand. In July, we wrote an article titled &quot;Thinking The Unthinkable: Donald Trump, GOP Nominee.&quot; Since that point, we&#039;ve been taking him very seriously indeed, and we now think the nomination is basically Trump&#039;s for the taking.&lt;/I&gt;

Com&#039;on...  Credit where credit is due..

I called Trump&#039;s candidacy from DAY ONE...

I said over and over that you don&#039;t become richer than god by being ignorant or a clown or any of the other names the Left Wingery loves to spew about Trump...  I also said that ya&#039;all ignore Trump&#039;s potential at yer own peril..

I called that one dead on ballz accurate...  :D

Michale
598</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We thought Trump was a joke when he started off too, we fully admit. But we were a little quicker to realize that something was going on even if everyone inside the Beltway had their head buried in the sand. In July, we wrote an article titled "Thinking The Unthinkable: Donald Trump, GOP Nominee." Since that point, we've been taking him very seriously indeed, and we now think the nomination is basically Trump's for the taking.</i></p>
<p>Com'on...  Credit where credit is due..</p>
<p>I called Trump's candidacy from DAY ONE...</p>
<p>I said over and over that you don't become richer than god by being ignorant or a clown or any of the other names the Left Wingery loves to spew about Trump...  I also said that ya'all ignore Trump's potential at yer own peril..</p>
<p>I called that one dead on ballz accurate...  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
598</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68046</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 12:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68046</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Our second award goes to Rahm Emanuel, who conveniently fought in court to keep a video of a black man being shot by police out of the public&#039;s eye for long enough for Rahm to be re-elected. &lt;/I&gt;

What does it matter??

By the Left Wingery&#039;s definition, that video is a &quot;fraud&quot;...

Michale
597</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Our second award goes to Rahm Emanuel, who conveniently fought in court to keep a video of a black man being shot by police out of the public's eye for long enough for Rahm to be re-elected. </i></p>
<p>What does it matter??</p>
<p>By the Left Wingery's definition, that video is a "fraud"...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
597</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68045</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68045</guid>
		<description>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/24/clinton-aide-key-focus-in-fbi-server-investigation.html?intcmp=hpbt2

Yea...  No scandal there, eh???

It&#039;s a race to see what happens to Hillary first..

Elected or Indicted...   

Michale
596</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/24/clinton-aide-key-focus-in-fbi-server-investigation.html?intcmp=hpbt2" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/24/clinton-aide-key-focus-in-fbi-server-investigation.html?intcmp=hpbt2</a></p>
<p>Yea...  No scandal there, eh???</p>
<p>It's a race to see what happens to Hillary first..</p>
<p>Elected or Indicted...   </p>
<p>Michale<br />
596</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68044</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68044</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But to delay the release of evidence of a police officer committing a crime

So much for INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, eh?? :^/

I guess cops are not afforded the &quot;luxury&quot; of jurisprudence, eh??

What &quot;crime&quot; did this cop commit???

He shot an armed man who was high on PCP....

Crime?? Not from where I am sitting...&lt;/I&gt;

And any 1st Year Law Student... hell, anyone who has watched DROP DEAD DIVA will be able to PROVE beyond ANY doubt that the charges against the officer are SOLELY, COMPLETELY and UNEQUIVOCALLY politically motivated...

All one has to do is pose one question..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;If this &#039;crime&#039; is so heinous and bad, why was the officer not charged until a YEAR after the allegedly &#039;crime&#039;??&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

This officer will walk...  

You can take that to the bank...

Michale
595</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But to delay the release of evidence of a police officer committing a crime</p>
<p>So much for INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, eh?? :^/</p>
<p>I guess cops are not afforded the "luxury" of jurisprudence, eh??</p>
<p>What "crime" did this cop commit???</p>
<p>He shot an armed man who was high on PCP....</p>
<p>Crime?? Not from where I am sitting...</i></p>
<p>And any 1st Year Law Student... hell, anyone who has watched DROP DEAD DIVA will be able to PROVE beyond ANY doubt that the charges against the officer are SOLELY, COMPLETELY and UNEQUIVOCALLY politically motivated...</p>
<p>All one has to do is pose one question..</p>
<p><b>"If this 'crime' is so heinous and bad, why was the officer not charged until a YEAR after the allegedly 'crime'??"</b></p>
<p>This officer will walk...  </p>
<p>You can take that to the bank...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
595</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68043</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68043</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Our second award goes to Rahm Emanuel, who conveniently fought in court to keep a video of a black man being shot by police out of the public&#039;s eye for long enough for Rahm to be re-elected. That&#039;s downright shameful, but it&#039;s entirely expected when you consider that Rahm Emanuel was behind it. Rahm is the modern personification of &quot;Chicago-style politics,&quot; in fact. But to delay the release of evidence of a police officer committing a crime merely to further your own political ambitions certainly takes things to a new level, even for Rahm. Worst Political Scandal -- not the video itself, but the 13-month delay so Rahm could continue being mayor.&lt;/I&gt;

But!!! But!!!  But!!!

Hillary supports Rahm completely and unequivocally!!???

So, either Rahm is not so bad...

Or Hillary is a luser for supporting him!!

Which is it??

Hoisted by ya&#039;all&#039;s Picard...  :D

Seriously though.. It&#039;s easy to see why Rahm has Hillay&#039;s undying support....

Ya&#039;all just HAVE to know that Rahm knows where a LOT of Hillary&#039;s and Bill&#039;s bodies are buried...  Probably because Rahm buried more than a few of them...

How do you like your Democrat Candidate now??  :D

Michale
594</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Our second award goes to Rahm Emanuel, who conveniently fought in court to keep a video of a black man being shot by police out of the public's eye for long enough for Rahm to be re-elected. That's downright shameful, but it's entirely expected when you consider that Rahm Emanuel was behind it. Rahm is the modern personification of "Chicago-style politics," in fact. But to delay the release of evidence of a police officer committing a crime merely to further your own political ambitions certainly takes things to a new level, even for Rahm. Worst Political Scandal -- not the video itself, but the 13-month delay so Rahm could continue being mayor.</i></p>
<p>But!!! But!!!  But!!!</p>
<p>Hillary supports Rahm completely and unequivocally!!???</p>
<p>So, either Rahm is not so bad...</p>
<p>Or Hillary is a luser for supporting him!!</p>
<p>Which is it??</p>
<p>Hoisted by ya'all's Picard...  :D</p>
<p>Seriously though.. It's easy to see why Rahm has Hillay's undying support....</p>
<p>Ya'all just HAVE to know that Rahm knows where a LOT of Hillary's and Bill's bodies are buried...  Probably because Rahm buried more than a few of them...</p>
<p>How do you like your Democrat Candidate now??  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
594</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68042</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68042</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;This all will be revealed as ethereal political spin next November, when (especially if Donald Trump is the nominee) the election results will show record levels of support from all minority groups for the Democratic candidate.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea??

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/24/us/politics/hillary-clinton-is-not-my-abuela-critics-say.html?_r=0

They even coined a new word for Hillary&#039;s abysmal outreach..

&lt;B&gt;HISPANDERING&lt;/B&gt;

I have to admit, that&#039;s pretty catchy....  :D

And a well deserved brand for Hillary&#039;s campaign...

Michale
593</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This all will be revealed as ethereal political spin next November, when (especially if Donald Trump is the nominee) the election results will show record levels of support from all minority groups for the Democratic candidate.</i></p>
<p>Yea??</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/24/us/politics/hillary-clinton-is-not-my-abuela-critics-say.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/24/us/politics/hillary-clinton-is-not-my-abuela-critics-say.html?_r=0</a></p>
<p>They even coined a new word for Hillary's abysmal outreach..</p>
<p><b>HISPANDERING</b></p>
<p>I have to admit, that's pretty catchy....  :D</p>
<p>And a well deserved brand for Hillary's campaign...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
593</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68041</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68041</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; since it certainly now seems like she&#039;s about to skate into the White House.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, that&#039;s what she (and ya&#039;all) thought in 2008..  

I&#039;m just sayin...  :D

&lt;I&gt;Edwards is a Southern, pro-life Democrat,&lt;/I&gt;

Who supports a refugee ban....

&lt;I&gt;For being so effective at getting their message out, and for creating a movement which spread like wildfire, Black Lives Matter was the Best Political Theater of the year.&lt;/I&gt;

Unfortunately, their &quot;message&quot; is nothing more than KILL COPS, DESTROY PROPERTY and their entire existence is based on a lie..

Not sure if that&#039;s something worth honoring...  :^/

&lt;I&gt; Hillary&#039;s emails were in a category by themselves, the category of &quot;scandals&quot; as opposed to scandals. That pretty much sums it up, in fact.&lt;/I&gt;

So, let me see if I have this straight..

David Patraeus was a scandal...  But Hillary, who did much much MUCH worse than Patraeus is a &quot;scandal&quot;???

Ahhh That&#039;s right..  Patraeus has a -R after his name and Hillary has a -D after her name..

OK.. Now that makes sense..

&lt;I&gt;But to delay the release of evidence of a police officer committing a crime&lt;/I&gt;

So much for INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, eh??  :^/

I guess cops are not afforded the &quot;luxury&quot; of jurisprudence, eh??

What &quot;crime&quot; did this cop commit???

He shot an armed man who was high on PCP....

Crime??  Not from where I am sitting...


&lt;I&gt;We began 2016 with &quot;It snows in wintertime!&quot; as the clear frontrunner for the Most Overreported Story, but that quickly faded. &lt;/I&gt;

As opposed to Obama&#039;s hysterical &lt;B&gt;&quot;ICE MELTS IN SUMMER!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt; campaign??  :D

I have been waiting ALL year to do that!!  :D

Thanx, CW..  :D

&lt;I&gt;In his campaign announcement he used terms like &quot;criminals&quot; and &quot;rapists&quot; to describe the Mexicans coming into America.&lt;/I&gt;

ILLEGAL Mexicans coming to America...

&lt;I&gt;But, good as that idea is, there&#039;s another that is still better. The Best Idea of 2016 (again, it started earlier, but it really proved itself this year) was &quot;putting cameras on cops.&quot; Cameras don&#039;t lie. Sometimes citizens lie, and sometimes police officers lie, but cameras don&#039;t. &lt;/I&gt;

But the problem is that those with a racist or hate agenda will lie about what the camera says..

Just ask Ray Tessing in Cincinnati...

&lt;I&gt;The boy who put together a clock that was treated as a bomb, for some reason&lt;/I&gt;

Probably because it DID look like one..

Which was the intent of the family... Now they are suing for a 15 million dollar pay day...

&lt;I&gt;Pamela Gellar, who provoked a terrorist attack with a public exhibition of Mohammed cartoons,&lt;/I&gt;

Ahhh.. So GELLAR is to blame and not the muslim terrorists themselves..

So, using that reasoning, then PLANNED PARENTHOOD is to blame for the Colorado shooting and not the scumbag who actually DID the shooting..

Because, PP &quot;provoked&quot; the shooting..

Right???  :^/

Michale
592</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> since it certainly now seems like she's about to skate into the White House.</i></p>
<p>Yea, that's what she (and ya'all) thought in 2008..  </p>
<p>I'm just sayin...  :D</p>
<p><i>Edwards is a Southern, pro-life Democrat,</i></p>
<p>Who supports a refugee ban....</p>
<p><i>For being so effective at getting their message out, and for creating a movement which spread like wildfire, Black Lives Matter was the Best Political Theater of the year.</i></p>
<p>Unfortunately, their "message" is nothing more than KILL COPS, DESTROY PROPERTY and their entire existence is based on a lie..</p>
<p>Not sure if that's something worth honoring...  :^/</p>
<p><i> Hillary's emails were in a category by themselves, the category of "scandals" as opposed to scandals. That pretty much sums it up, in fact.</i></p>
<p>So, let me see if I have this straight..</p>
<p>David Patraeus was a scandal...  But Hillary, who did much much MUCH worse than Patraeus is a "scandal"???</p>
<p>Ahhh That's right..  Patraeus has a -R after his name and Hillary has a -D after her name..</p>
<p>OK.. Now that makes sense..</p>
<p><i>But to delay the release of evidence of a police officer committing a crime</i></p>
<p>So much for INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, eh??  :^/</p>
<p>I guess cops are not afforded the "luxury" of jurisprudence, eh??</p>
<p>What "crime" did this cop commit???</p>
<p>He shot an armed man who was high on PCP....</p>
<p>Crime??  Not from where I am sitting...</p>
<p><i>We began 2016 with "It snows in wintertime!" as the clear frontrunner for the Most Overreported Story, but that quickly faded. </i></p>
<p>As opposed to Obama's hysterical <b>"ICE MELTS IN SUMMER!!!"</b> campaign??  :D</p>
<p>I have been waiting ALL year to do that!!  :D</p>
<p>Thanx, CW..  :D</p>
<p><i>In his campaign announcement he used terms like "criminals" and "rapists" to describe the Mexicans coming into America.</i></p>
<p>ILLEGAL Mexicans coming to America...</p>
<p><i>But, good as that idea is, there's another that is still better. The Best Idea of 2016 (again, it started earlier, but it really proved itself this year) was "putting cameras on cops." Cameras don't lie. Sometimes citizens lie, and sometimes police officers lie, but cameras don't. </i></p>
<p>But the problem is that those with a racist or hate agenda will lie about what the camera says..</p>
<p>Just ask Ray Tessing in Cincinnati...</p>
<p><i>The boy who put together a clock that was treated as a bomb, for some reason</i></p>
<p>Probably because it DID look like one..</p>
<p>Which was the intent of the family... Now they are suing for a 15 million dollar pay day...</p>
<p><i>Pamela Gellar, who provoked a terrorist attack with a public exhibition of Mohammed cartoons,</i></p>
<p>Ahhh.. So GELLAR is to blame and not the muslim terrorists themselves..</p>
<p>So, using that reasoning, then PLANNED PARENTHOOD is to blame for the Colorado shooting and not the scumbag who actually DID the shooting..</p>
<p>Because, PP "provoked" the shooting..</p>
<p>Right???  :^/</p>
<p>Michale<br />
592</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/23/my-2015-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comment-68028</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 05:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11625#comment-68028</guid>
		<description>... just in case this gets lost in the shuffle ...

From Part I:

&lt;I&gt;Love him or hate him, you&#039;ve got to admit that no other political figure even came close to the attention Trump has gotten in the past six months. Trump is unquestionably the Best Politician of the year.&lt;/I&gt;

When did the deciding factor as to who is the best politician become the person who gets the most attention?

I guess the answer is about the time that politician ceased to be known as an honourable profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... just in case this gets lost in the shuffle ...</p>
<p>From Part I:</p>
<p><i>Love him or hate him, you've got to admit that no other political figure even came close to the attention Trump has gotten in the past six months. Trump is unquestionably the Best Politician of the year.</i></p>
<p>When did the deciding factor as to who is the best politician become the person who gets the most attention?</p>
<p>I guess the answer is about the time that politician ceased to be known as an honourable profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
