<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye Lindsey, And The Hillary Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-68008</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-68008</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to the War On Women??

https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2971/2801/original.jpg?w=600&amp;h

Oh... There it is...   :D

Michale
582</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to the War On Women??</p>
<p><a href="https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2971/2801/original.jpg?w=600&amp;h" rel="nofollow">https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2971/2801/original.jpg?w=600&amp;h</a></p>
<p>Oh... There it is...   :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
582</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-68002</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-68002</guid>
		<description>CW,

Close enough..  :D Thanx

Michale
575</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW,</p>
<p>Close enough..  :D Thanx</p>
<p>Michale<br />
575</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-68000</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 06:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-68000</guid>
		<description>Michale [5] -

You mean in [4]?  I kinda guessed where you wanted the italics stopped.  Sorry if I guessed wrong...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale [5] -</p>
<p>You mean in [4]?  I kinda guessed where you wanted the italics stopped.  Sorry if I guessed wrong...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67998</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67998</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;VIDEO: Women defy media narrative, love Trump at packed Michigan rally

DECEMBER 22, 2015&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-ladies-gaga-for-trump-at-michigan-rally/

Women have a problem with Trump??

Really???

Michale
574</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>VIDEO: Women defy media narrative, love Trump at packed Michigan rally</p>
<p>DECEMBER 22, 2015</b><br />
<a href="http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-ladies-gaga-for-trump-at-michigan-rally/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-ladies-gaga-for-trump-at-michigan-rally/</a></p>
<p>Women have a problem with Trump??</p>
<p>Really???</p>
<p>Michale<br />
574</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67986</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67986</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Trump-Clinton is kind-of like the lightning rod vs. the weather vane. put &#039;em both on the roof and see who&#039;s left standing when the storm&#039;s over.&lt;/I&gt;

Well put...  :D

Michale
567</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump-Clinton is kind-of like the lightning rod vs. the weather vane. put 'em both on the roof and see who's left standing when the storm's over.</i></p>
<p>Well put...  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
567</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67985</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67985</guid>
		<description>Trump-Clinton is kind-of like the lightning rod vs. the weather vane. put &#039;em both on the roof and see who&#039;s left standing when the storm&#039;s over.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump-Clinton is kind-of like the lightning rod vs. the weather vane. put 'em both on the roof and see who's left standing when the storm's over.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67984</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67984</guid>
		<description>Hay CW,

Ya mind closing that attribute above?? 

Tanks......  And planes!!!

yuk yuk that never gets old!!  :D

Michale
566</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay CW,</p>
<p>Ya mind closing that attribute above?? </p>
<p>Tanks......  And planes!!!</p>
<p>yuk yuk that never gets old!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
566</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67983</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67983</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But if that DOES occur, can you imagine the GLOATING ya&#039;all will have to endure from me!???

&quot;HA!!!! REPUBLICANS put Hillary in the White House!!! NEENER NEENER NEENER!!!

Not that I would EVER stoop to such childish behavior...&lt;/i&gt;  

&lt;B&gt;&quot;{{cough}} {{cough}} Bullshit..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-ICEMAN, Top Gun

:D

Michale
565</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But if that DOES occur, can you imagine the GLOATING ya'all will have to endure from me!???</p>
<p>"HA!!!! REPUBLICANS put Hillary in the White House!!! NEENER NEENER NEENER!!!</p>
<p>Not that I would EVER stoop to such childish behavior...</i>  </p>
<p><b>"{{cough}} {{cough}} Bullshit.."</b><br />
-ICEMAN, Top Gun</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
565</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67982</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67982</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I can&#039;t disagree with you much there. &lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I am fatter...  er... FLATTERED...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Eddie Murphy, The Nutty Professor

:D

&lt;I&gt;The only difference is her stand on social issues.&lt;/I&gt;

And keep in mind that Hillary &quot;evolved&quot; on those social issues..

Just in time for the General Election..

How convenient, eh??

&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s almost as if Carly Fiorina and Jeb Bush had a baby &lt;/I&gt;

EEeeewwwwww  Now THERE&#039;S a mental picture that&#039;s going to haunt me for the rest of the day, thank you very much..  :D

&lt;I&gt;Which is why, if her opponent in the general election is Donald Trump, you better get used to saying President Clinton right now.&lt;/I&gt;

Not even remotely...

Simply by their nature, Independents and NPAs will break for Trump and break big time...

Independents are Hillary&#039;s Achilles heel...

And they are Trump&#039;s biggest strengths..

Plus there is the SCANDAL factor which hits Hillary a LOT harder than it hits Trump...

The ONLY possible path to the White House for Hillary is that Republicans break away en masse from the GOP and vote Hillary..  

Which is a distinct possibility, I grant you..

But if that DOES occur, can you imagine the GLOATING ya&#039;all will have to endure from me!???

&lt;B&gt;&quot;HA!!!!  REPUBLICANS put Hillary in the White House!!!  NEENER NEENER NEENER!!!&lt;/B&gt;

:D

Michale
564</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I can't disagree with you much there. </i></p>
<p><b>"I am fatter...  er... FLATTERED..."</b><br />
-Eddie Murphy, The Nutty Professor</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p><i>The only difference is her stand on social issues.</i></p>
<p>And keep in mind that Hillary "evolved" on those social issues..</p>
<p>Just in time for the General Election..</p>
<p>How convenient, eh??</p>
<p><i>It's almost as if Carly Fiorina and Jeb Bush had a baby </i></p>
<p>EEeeewwwwww  Now THERE'S a mental picture that's going to haunt me for the rest of the day, thank you very much..  :D</p>
<p><i>Which is why, if her opponent in the general election is Donald Trump, you better get used to saying President Clinton right now.</i></p>
<p>Not even remotely...</p>
<p>Simply by their nature, Independents and NPAs will break for Trump and break big time...</p>
<p>Independents are Hillary's Achilles heel...</p>
<p>And they are Trump's biggest strengths..</p>
<p>Plus there is the SCANDAL factor which hits Hillary a LOT harder than it hits Trump...</p>
<p>The ONLY possible path to the White House for Hillary is that Republicans break away en masse from the GOP and vote Hillary..  </p>
<p>Which is a distinct possibility, I grant you..</p>
<p>But if that DOES occur, can you imagine the GLOATING ya'all will have to endure from me!???</p>
<p><b>"HA!!!!  REPUBLICANS put Hillary in the White House!!!  NEENER NEENER NEENER!!!</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
564</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67981</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67981</guid>
		<description>Michale wrote:

&quot;On the flip side, if Hillary had a &#039;-R&#039; after her name, she would be the GOP dream candidate...&quot;

I can&#039;t disagree with you much there. The only difference is her stand on social issues. Otherwise she is beholding to Wall Street and big corporations, and under a cloud of scandals from Whitewater to State Dept. e-mails. She would fit in with ALL the Republicans in that regard. It&#039;s almost as if Carly Fiorina and Jeb Bush had a baby and came up with Hillary Clinton.  

Which is why, if her opponent in the general election is Donald Trump, you better get used to saying President Clinton right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale wrote:</p>
<p>"On the flip side, if Hillary had a '-R' after her name, she would be the GOP dream candidate..."</p>
<p>I can't disagree with you much there. The only difference is her stand on social issues. Otherwise she is beholding to Wall Street and big corporations, and under a cloud of scandals from Whitewater to State Dept. e-mails. She would fit in with ALL the Republicans in that regard. It's almost as if Carly Fiorina and Jeb Bush had a baby and came up with Hillary Clinton.  </p>
<p>Which is why, if her opponent in the general election is Donald Trump, you better get used to saying President Clinton right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/21/goodbye-lindsey-and-the-hillary-doctrine/#comment-67979</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 09:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11615#comment-67979</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;We now come to that impossible segue I warned you about earlier. Republicans weren&#039;t the only ones on television last week, as the Democratic National Committee scheduled a Democratic candidate debate at 3:00 A.M. on a Sunday morning. Well, not really (but it&#039;s not that much of an exaggeration, is it?). &lt;/I&gt;

No, it&#039;s not much of an exaggeration..

Hillary must be protected at all costs..

All this coddling doesn&#039;t bode too well for Hillary&#039;s chances in the General...


&lt;I&gt;Clinton has no real excuse for not offering up a much more diplomatic answer to what our future policy towards the region should be. She used to be our chief diplomat, after all.&lt;/I&gt;

Our chief diplomat who&#039;s SOLE accomplishment in office was a whole buttload of frequent flyer miles...  :^/

Excellent commentary..

Hillary&#039;s coziness with Wall Street, her aggressive use of military force...

If you were to take away Hillary&#039;s &#039;-D&#039; after her name, no Democrat in the country would vote for her...

On the flip side, if Hillary had a &#039;-R&#039; after her name, she would be the GOP dream candidate...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;And so it goes... and so it goes...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
Billy Joel

Michale
562</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We now come to that impossible segue I warned you about earlier. Republicans weren't the only ones on television last week, as the Democratic National Committee scheduled a Democratic candidate debate at 3:00 A.M. on a Sunday morning. Well, not really (but it's not that much of an exaggeration, is it?). </i></p>
<p>No, it's not much of an exaggeration..</p>
<p>Hillary must be protected at all costs..</p>
<p>All this coddling doesn't bode too well for Hillary's chances in the General...</p>
<p><i>Clinton has no real excuse for not offering up a much more diplomatic answer to what our future policy towards the region should be. She used to be our chief diplomat, after all.</i></p>
<p>Our chief diplomat who's SOLE accomplishment in office was a whole buttload of frequent flyer miles...  :^/</p>
<p>Excellent commentary..</p>
<p>Hillary's coziness with Wall Street, her aggressive use of military force...</p>
<p>If you were to take away Hillary's '-D' after her name, no Democrat in the country would vote for her...</p>
<p>On the flip side, if Hillary had a '-R' after her name, she would be the GOP dream candidate...</p>
<p><b>"And so it goes... and so it goes..."</b><br />
Billy Joel</p>
<p>Michale<br />
562</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
