<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Ryan Criticizes His Own Lack Of Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65762</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65762</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;OK, &quot;Saving Speaker Ryan&quot; is pretty damn funny! I think you&#039;re onto something -- I bet this line gets used in headlines all over the place the first time he stumbles.&lt;/I&gt;

Maybe I should register SavingSpeakerRyan.us eh??  :D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>OK, "Saving Speaker Ryan" is pretty damn funny! I think you're onto something -- I bet this line gets used in headlines all over the place the first time he stumbles.</i></p>
<p>Maybe I should register SavingSpeakerRyan.us eh??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65758</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65758</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;[ignoring your intro blather...]&lt;/I&gt;

In all seriousness, try to see things from &lt;B&gt;MY&lt;/B&gt; perspective..

&lt;B&gt;On July 15, 1976, twenty-six children and their bus driver were kidnapped in Chowchilla, California, by armed men who blocked the highway around 4:00 PM. The students, who were attending Dairyland Elementary School for summer school, were being dropped off on their way back from a field trip at the Chowchilla fairgrounds&#039; swimming pool. The kidnappers hid the bus in a drainage slough and drove the children and bus driver around in two vans for 11 hours, eventually taking them to a quarry in Livermore, California. There, the kidnappers imprisoned the victims inside a buried moving van with a small amount of food and water, and a number of mattresses.&lt;/B&gt;

*THAT* is &quot;hostage taking&quot;....

Is it really necessary to compare simple partisan opposition to THAT!??

I mean, The GODWIN Principle is a very sound a valid principle for a reason..

Surely, comparing abhorrent and heinous acts like terrorism and hostage-taking to simple Partisan Opposition is, at the VERY least, Godwin-esque...

I&#039;m just sayin&#039;....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>[ignoring your intro blather...]</i></p>
<p>In all seriousness, try to see things from <b>MY</b> perspective..</p>
<p><b>On July 15, 1976, twenty-six children and their bus driver were kidnapped in Chowchilla, California, by armed men who blocked the highway around 4:00 PM. The students, who were attending Dairyland Elementary School for summer school, were being dropped off on their way back from a field trip at the Chowchilla fairgrounds' swimming pool. The kidnappers hid the bus in a drainage slough and drove the children and bus driver around in two vans for 11 hours, eventually taking them to a quarry in Livermore, California. There, the kidnappers imprisoned the victims inside a buried moving van with a small amount of food and water, and a number of mattresses.</b></p>
<p>*THAT* is "hostage taking"....</p>
<p>Is it really necessary to compare simple partisan opposition to THAT!??</p>
<p>I mean, The GODWIN Principle is a very sound a valid principle for a reason..</p>
<p>Surely, comparing abhorrent and heinous acts like terrorism and hostage-taking to simple Partisan Opposition is, at the VERY least, Godwin-esque...</p>
<p>I'm just sayin'....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65756</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65756</guid>
		<description>CW-5

You are so FN right about that!   The funny thing is, those period Koch soaking miners weren&#039;t all that profane by modern US standards.  If the writers had used authentic speech, the characters would have, according to the studio, &quot;sounded like Yosemite Sam.&quot;  The audience would have laughed their Howard Johnsons&#039; off.  The script had to be translated to get the right impact....into something like a dialect of Army Creole.  I have a hankering for bourbon now.....and I don&#039;t even like bourbon.

Oh, break a leg, as those theatrical &quot;cats&quot; say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW-5</p>
<p>You are so FN right about that!   The funny thing is, those period Koch soaking miners weren't all that profane by modern US standards.  If the writers had used authentic speech, the characters would have, according to the studio, "sounded like Yosemite Sam."  The audience would have laughed their Howard Johnsons' off.  The script had to be translated to get the right impact....into something like a dialect of Army Creole.  I have a hankering for bourbon now.....and I don't even like bourbon.</p>
<p>Oh, break a leg, as those theatrical "cats" say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65755</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65755</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;OK, &quot;Saving Speaker Ryan&quot; is pretty damn funny! I think you&#039;re onto something -- I bet this line gets used in headlines all over the place the first time he stumbles.&lt;/I&gt;

Think I can get paid??  :D

&lt;i&gt;Well done! [applause]&lt;/I&gt;

Thank you VERY much..  :D

I would like to thank all the little people I stepped on, on my way to the top...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>OK, "Saving Speaker Ryan" is pretty damn funny! I think you're onto something -- I bet this line gets used in headlines all over the place the first time he stumbles.</i></p>
<p>Think I can get paid??  :D</p>
<p><i>Well done! [applause]</i></p>
<p>Thank you VERY much..  :D</p>
<p>I would like to thank all the little people I stepped on, on my way to the top...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65745</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65745</guid>
		<description>Michale [2] -

[ignoring your intro blather...]

OK, &quot;Saving Speaker Ryan&quot; is pretty damn funny!  I think you&#039;re onto something -- I bet this line gets used in headlines all over the place the first time he stumbles.

Well done! [applause]

:-)

TheStig -

I&#039;m amazed you were able to write that entire comment without using profanity.  I loved Deadwood, but man, the language is such that you start to think certain words are commonplace.  After binge-watching, it&#039;d be hard not to call certain people... no, wait, I&#039;ve gone too far...

Heh.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale [2] -</p>
<p>[ignoring your intro blather...]</p>
<p>OK, "Saving Speaker Ryan" is pretty damn funny!  I think you're onto something -- I bet this line gets used in headlines all over the place the first time he stumbles.</p>
<p>Well done! [applause]</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>TheStig -</p>
<p>I'm amazed you were able to write that entire comment without using profanity.  I loved Deadwood, but man, the language is such that you start to think certain words are commonplace.  After binge-watching, it'd be hard not to call certain people... no, wait, I've gone too far...</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65737</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65737</guid>
		<description>I happened to chance upon this column around midnight my time zone, after binge watching 4 episodes of Deadwood.  

My first thought was: I did not see this coming!

My second was:  Congress can actually keep a secret!!

Which segued into my third: The political fallout resulting from the 95-96 gov. shutdown has not been completely forgotten.

That was enough mental closure to allow me to sleep on the news.

This AM, have confirmed the basic narrative from multiple news sources, I have a few questions.

Did Ryan really not know about this, or was it a secret codicil to the &quot;more time for family&quot; prenupt that allowed Ryan to accept the apparently thankless task of being Speaker?

Could this deal be an attempt by the Republican Establishment to reign in, or even purge, the Tea Party Wing?  Resistance is not useless?

Or, is it just the usual game of Congressional Chicken, played out more discretely than usual?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happened to chance upon this column around midnight my time zone, after binge watching 4 episodes of Deadwood.  </p>
<p>My first thought was: I did not see this coming!</p>
<p>My second was:  Congress can actually keep a secret!!</p>
<p>Which segued into my third: The political fallout resulting from the 95-96 gov. shutdown has not been completely forgotten.</p>
<p>That was enough mental closure to allow me to sleep on the news.</p>
<p>This AM, have confirmed the basic narrative from multiple news sources, I have a few questions.</p>
<p>Did Ryan really not know about this, or was it a secret codicil to the "more time for family" prenupt that allowed Ryan to accept the apparently thankless task of being Speaker?</p>
<p>Could this deal be an attempt by the Republican Establishment to reign in, or even purge, the Tea Party Wing?  Resistance is not useless?</p>
<p>Or, is it just the usual game of Congressional Chicken, played out more discretely than usual?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65733</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65733</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;because it assures him that he won&#039;t be forced into letting the Tea Partiers play their hostage-taking games until at least after the next election.&lt;/I&gt;

So, when Democrats and Obama are not allowing the Defense spending authorization legislation to pass, they are taking &quot;hostages&quot; too, right??

No??

Didna think so..  :^/

It&#039;s only criminal if the GOP opposes and holds up legislation that Democrats want...

For Democrats to hold up and delay defense spending to push their unpopular agenda, it&#039;s perfectly acceptable..  

Gotcha {{wink, wink}}

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>because it assures him that he won't be forced into letting the Tea Partiers play their hostage-taking games until at least after the next election.</i></p>
<p>So, when Democrats and Obama are not allowing the Defense spending authorization legislation to pass, they are taking "hostages" too, right??</p>
<p>No??</p>
<p>Didna think so..  :^/</p>
<p>It's only criminal if the GOP opposes and holds up legislation that Democrats want...</p>
<p>For Democrats to hold up and delay defense spending to push their unpopular agenda, it's perfectly acceptable..  </p>
<p>Gotcha {{wink, wink}}</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65730</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65730</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;because it assures him that he won&#039;t be forced into letting the Tea Partiers play their hostage-taking games until at least after the next election.&lt;/I&gt;

{{sssiiiighhhhhh}}

&lt;I&gt;Most of the inside-the-Beltway punditocracy focused on the &quot;this process stinks&quot; quote, and many didn&#039;t even bother to provide the rest of what Ryan had to say. This is because the punditocracy loves the shiny, shiny object of &quot;conflict&quot; (which they report on to the exclusion of all else at times). &lt;/I&gt;

Let&#039;s face the facts..

The punditocracy only loves the &quot;shiny shiny object of conflict&quot; of the opposing Party..

Republican pundits love the conflict of the Democrat Party and ignores the conflict within their own Party...

And versie vicie...


&lt;I&gt; Ryan&#039;s not going to come out and publicly admit it, but he knows that the deal Boehner just struck could mean the difference between a short and disastrous term as speaker and a longer and more successful term for Speaker Ryan.&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;SAVING SPEAKER RYAN&lt;/B&gt;??   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>because it assures him that he won't be forced into letting the Tea Partiers play their hostage-taking games until at least after the next election.</i></p>
<p>{{sssiiiighhhhhh}}</p>
<p><i>Most of the inside-the-Beltway punditocracy focused on the "this process stinks" quote, and many didn't even bother to provide the rest of what Ryan had to say. This is because the punditocracy loves the shiny, shiny object of "conflict" (which they report on to the exclusion of all else at times). </i></p>
<p>Let's face the facts..</p>
<p>The punditocracy only loves the "shiny shiny object of conflict" of the opposing Party..</p>
<p>Republican pundits love the conflict of the Democrat Party and ignores the conflict within their own Party...</p>
<p>And versie vicie...</p>
<p><i> Ryan's not going to come out and publicly admit it, but he knows that the deal Boehner just struck could mean the difference between a short and disastrous term as speaker and a longer and more successful term for Speaker Ryan.</i></p>
<p><b>SAVING SPEAKER RYAN</b>??   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/27/paul-ryan-criticizes-his-own-lack-of-leadership/#comment-65726</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11384#comment-65726</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming this thing will pass and that looks like another win for McConnell the Rinosaur. No shutdowns. He always prioritizes the perpetual campaign above all other considerations. He couldn&#039;t allow Speaker Cruz and the Freedumb Caucus to threaten his job with their high stakes performance art. The baggers should primary Mitch. That would teach him a lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm assuming this thing will pass and that looks like another win for McConnell the Rinosaur. No shutdowns. He always prioritizes the perpetual campaign above all other considerations. He couldn't allow Speaker Cruz and the Freedumb Caucus to threaten his job with their high stakes performance art. The baggers should primary Mitch. That would teach him a lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
