<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points [362] -- Beyond The Debate Stage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 13:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64603</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64603</guid>
		<description>Oh Micha

Funny how your claims of facts and truth always come up bass ackwards.

Not ha ha funny, of course.
More like the funny taste of milk that is past its prime.

So, where in Bernie&#039;s plan is the 90%?
You know what I mean right?
Bernie&#039;s actual plan... perhaps a link to a video where he said what you claim... from his website... anything?

In other words, not what you and others want to believe, but what the candidate has proposed.
Because, as you may or may not know, there seems to be a rather large discrepancy that un-coincidentally matches your ideology.

You also seem to be repeating yourself more than usual.

And are you really just going to ignore all the other comments and questions I asked you?

I realize that with foot and mouth disease, you may be struggling, but come on.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Micha</p>
<p>Funny how your claims of facts and truth always come up bass ackwards.</p>
<p>Not ha ha funny, of course.<br />
More like the funny taste of milk that is past its prime.</p>
<p>So, where in Bernie's plan is the 90%?<br />
You know what I mean right?<br />
Bernie's actual plan... perhaps a link to a video where he said what you claim... from his website... anything?</p>
<p>In other words, not what you and others want to believe, but what the candidate has proposed.<br />
Because, as you may or may not know, there seems to be a rather large discrepancy that un-coincidentally matches your ideology.</p>
<p>You also seem to be repeating yourself more than usual.</p>
<p>And are you really just going to ignore all the other comments and questions I asked you?</p>
<p>I realize that with foot and mouth disease, you may be struggling, but come on.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64544</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64544</guid>
		<description>http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/09/24/another-climate-prediction-fizzles-dc-climate-rally-for-pope-shrinks-from-expected-200000-to-just-hundreds/

hehehehehehe

When is the Hysterical Left going to get the message..

The myth/con that is Human Caused Global Warming (But There Hasn&#039;t Been Any Warming In Decades) has had it&#039;s 15 minutes of fame..

The vast majority of Americans couldn&#039;t care less...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/09/24/another-climate-prediction-fizzles-dc-climate-rally-for-pope-shrinks-from-expected-200000-to-just-hundreds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/09/24/another-climate-prediction-fizzles-dc-climate-rally-for-pope-shrinks-from-expected-200000-to-just-hundreds/</a></p>
<p>hehehehehehe</p>
<p>When is the Hysterical Left going to get the message..</p>
<p>The myth/con that is Human Caused Global Warming (But There Hasn't Been Any Warming In Decades) has had it's 15 minutes of fame..</p>
<p>The vast majority of Americans couldn't care less...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64517</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64517</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;While we cannot and should not discount what Iran&#039;s supreme leader says, it is far more important to judge Iran on its actions.&lt;/I&gt;

I completely and unequivocally agree with that..

So, let&#039;s look at Iran&#039;s actions..

World&#039;s State Sponsor of terrorism..

Executes people for being gay...

Well, my mind is made up....  :D

Seriously, though.  You are right.  Lurch and Khameni can spout off till the cows come home..  Politicians or religious zealots... Bunch of hot air..

BUT...

Because we ARE dealing with a religious fanatic, the words he speaks MUST be taken seriously because the price of ignoring the words is too high a price to pay..

Put it in another context..  Richard Nixon scared the shit out of Congress when he said, &lt;B&gt;&quot;I can go to my office, get on the phone and launch a strike that will kill 200,000 people!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Which prompted Congress to take steps to insure that can&#039;t happen..

Words matter...  Threats matter even more...

And, oh yea...  Blue Lives Matter   :D



Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>While we cannot and should not discount what Iran's supreme leader says, it is far more important to judge Iran on its actions.</i></p>
<p>I completely and unequivocally agree with that..</p>
<p>So, let's look at Iran's actions..</p>
<p>World's State Sponsor of terrorism..</p>
<p>Executes people for being gay...</p>
<p>Well, my mind is made up....  :D</p>
<p>Seriously, though.  You are right.  Lurch and Khameni can spout off till the cows come home..  Politicians or religious zealots... Bunch of hot air..</p>
<p>BUT...</p>
<p>Because we ARE dealing with a religious fanatic, the words he speaks MUST be taken seriously because the price of ignoring the words is too high a price to pay..</p>
<p>Put it in another context..  Richard Nixon scared the shit out of Congress when he said, <b>"I can go to my office, get on the phone and launch a strike that will kill 200,000 people!!"</b></p>
<p>Which prompted Congress to take steps to insure that can't happen..</p>
<p>Words matter...  Threats matter even more...</p>
<p>And, oh yea...  Blue Lives Matter   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64516</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64516</guid>
		<description>While we cannot and should not discount what Iran&#039;s supreme leader says, it is far more important to judge Iran on its actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we cannot and should not discount what Iran's supreme leader says, it is far more important to judge Iran on its actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64513</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64513</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Please remember, I am following reliable sources of information on this matter. You should start doing the same.&lt;/I&gt;

My &quot;reliable source&quot; is the grand terrorist himself, Kahmani with a confirming source of SecState Lurch...

Doesn&#039;t get more &quot;reliable&quot; than that..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Please remember, I am following reliable sources of information on this matter. You should start doing the same.</i></p>
<p>My "reliable source" is the grand terrorist himself, Kahmani with a confirming source of SecState Lurch...</p>
<p>Doesn't get more "reliable" than that..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64512</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64512</guid>
		<description>Michale[87]

I have no time to waste or energy to spend on foolish games like that.

Please remember, I am following reliable sources of information on this matter. You should start doing the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale[87]</p>
<p>I have no time to waste or energy to spend on foolish games like that.</p>
<p>Please remember, I am following reliable sources of information on this matter. You should start doing the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64509</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64509</guid>
		<description>Speaking of narcissism...

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/obama-blocks-conservative-black-middle-schooler-from-following-him-on-twitter/

Gods, our POTUS can be so frakin&#039; thin-skinned...

What a whiney little biatch that our President would block a kid on twitter....

I guess Obama&#039;s claim that he is POTUS for *ALL* Americans is proven a lie once again...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of narcissism...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theamericanmirror.com/obama-blocks-conservative-black-middle-schooler-from-following-him-on-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theamericanmirror.com/obama-blocks-conservative-black-middle-schooler-from-following-him-on-twitter/</a></p>
<p>Gods, our POTUS can be so frakin' thin-skinned...</p>
<p>What a whiney little biatch that our President would block a kid on twitter....</p>
<p>I guess Obama's claim that he is POTUS for *ALL* Americans is proven a lie once again...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64508</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64508</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;WASHINGTON — Pope Francis urged his fellow American bishops to take care of the spiritual needs of priests and to welcome new immigrants into the United States, &lt;/B&gt;

No one in this country has a problem with immigrants..

At least, not anyone who is worth a damn...

The problem is, and always will be, ILLEGAL immigrants...

Criminals...

&lt;B&gt;gently admonishing them to &quot;flee the temptation of narcissism.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

You just HAVE to know that the pope had his eye on Obama when he said this..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>WASHINGTON — Pope Francis urged his fellow American bishops to take care of the spiritual needs of priests and to welcome new immigrants into the United States, </b></p>
<p>No one in this country has a problem with immigrants..</p>
<p>At least, not anyone who is worth a damn...</p>
<p>The problem is, and always will be, ILLEGAL immigrants...</p>
<p>Criminals...</p>
<p><b>gently admonishing them to "flee the temptation of narcissism."</b></p>
<p>You just HAVE to know that the pope had his eye on Obama when he said this..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64503</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64503</guid>
		<description>Liz,

Ask yourself 2 questions..

1.  Is it in keeping with what we know about Iran??

2.  Is there any evidence that disputes the claim??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p>Ask yourself 2 questions..</p>
<p>1.  Is it in keeping with what we know about Iran??</p>
<p>2.  Is there any evidence that disputes the claim??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64496</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 01:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64496</guid>
		<description>Oh, Michale ... still believing everything you read? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Michale ... still believing everything you read? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64492</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64492</guid>
		<description>And in other news....

Iran is demanding that all sanctions be TERMINATED, not suspended, but TERMINATED immediately...

If the sanctions are not terminated immediately, then Iran will not abide by the JCPOA restrictions..

WOW...  Who would have EVER thought this could happen...

Oh... wait.....  :^/


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in other news....</p>
<p>Iran is demanding that all sanctions be TERMINATED, not suspended, but TERMINATED immediately...</p>
<p>If the sanctions are not terminated immediately, then Iran will not abide by the JCPOA restrictions..</p>
<p>WOW...  Who would have EVER thought this could happen...</p>
<p>Oh... wait.....  :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64490</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64490</guid>
		<description>Re: Clinton...

Hillary has gone on and on about how her private insecure bathroom closet email server was &quot;allowed&quot; and &quot;authorized&quot;...

But she refuses to say **WHO** &quot;allowed&quot; or &quot;authorized&quot; this private insecure bathroom closet email server..

Because, whoever did should be prosecuted and sent to jail for a long LONG time...

But we all know the facts..  No one allowed or authorized Hillary&#039;s GiveTheFingerToCongressAndTheAmericanPeople email server...

It was solely and completely her decision...

And that is why she will implode..

Do ya&#039;all honestly believe that, if she somehow manages to limp thru the Primary and actually become the candidate, that she will have a snowballs chance in hell of prevailing in the general??

Her numbers are dive-bombing NOW..  And there is STILL so many more revelations to come....  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Clinton...</p>
<p>Hillary has gone on and on about how her private insecure bathroom closet email server was "allowed" and "authorized"...</p>
<p>But she refuses to say **WHO** "allowed" or "authorized" this private insecure bathroom closet email server..</p>
<p>Because, whoever did should be prosecuted and sent to jail for a long LONG time...</p>
<p>But we all know the facts..  No one allowed or authorized Hillary's GiveTheFingerToCongressAndTheAmericanPeople email server...</p>
<p>It was solely and completely her decision...</p>
<p>And that is why she will implode..</p>
<p>Do ya'all honestly believe that, if she somehow manages to limp thru the Primary and actually become the candidate, that she will have a snowballs chance in hell of prevailing in the general??</p>
<p>Her numbers are dive-bombing NOW..  And there is STILL so many more revelations to come....  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64488</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64488</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Well, if they&#039;re sending Hoover to NYC anyway, why not dress him up in lingerie and give him some prime real estate in the West Village?&lt;/I&gt;

heh

Now THAT was funny!!  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well, if they're sending Hoover to NYC anyway, why not dress him up in lingerie and give him some prime real estate in the West Village?</i></p>
<p>heh</p>
<p>Now THAT was funny!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64485</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64485</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;F.B.I. officials said that sending the Hoover figure to New York seemed to be a harmless idea at first. The figure -- a jowly, stern-faced Hoover dressed in a dark suit -- was originally on display in Washington at the F.B.I. headquarters building, which is named after Hoover, but the figure had been in storage for years.

To completely end the legacy, that last bit needs addressing as well -- the part about the headquarters &quot;named after Hoover.&quot; When the building is renamed, we&#039;ll believe the F.B.I. is serious about disavowing Hoover&#039;s legacy.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, if they&#039;re sending Hoover to NYC anyway, why not dress him up in lingerie and give him some prime real estate in the West Village?

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>F.B.I. officials said that sending the Hoover figure to New York seemed to be a harmless idea at first. The figure -- a jowly, stern-faced Hoover dressed in a dark suit -- was originally on display in Washington at the F.B.I. headquarters building, which is named after Hoover, but the figure had been in storage for years.</p>
<p>To completely end the legacy, that last bit needs addressing as well -- the part about the headquarters "named after Hoover." When the building is renamed, we'll believe the F.B.I. is serious about disavowing Hoover's legacy.</i></p>
<p>Well, if they're sending Hoover to NYC anyway, why not dress him up in lingerie and give him some prime real estate in the West Village?</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64482</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64482</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Militia Organizer Threatens to Arrest Stabenow Over Iran Deal&lt;/B&gt;
http://www3.blogs.rollcall.com/hill-blotter/john-ritzheimer-debbie-stabenow-arrest-threat-iran-deal/

Oh look..  Another zealot wanting to arrest a politician for doing their jobs....

I have always wondered why the targets don&#039;t just let these morons make the arrest??

And then turn around and prosecute them and sue them until they bleed out of every orifice!!

This moron is no different than the moron who want to &quot;arrest&quot; Karl Rove or Dick Cheney or Tony Blair..

Morons..  Ignorant morons...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Militia Organizer Threatens to Arrest Stabenow Over Iran Deal</b><br />
<a href="http://www3.blogs.rollcall.com/hill-blotter/john-ritzheimer-debbie-stabenow-arrest-threat-iran-deal/" rel="nofollow">http://www3.blogs.rollcall.com/hill-blotter/john-ritzheimer-debbie-stabenow-arrest-threat-iran-deal/</a></p>
<p>Oh look..  Another zealot wanting to arrest a politician for doing their jobs....</p>
<p>I have always wondered why the targets don't just let these morons make the arrest??</p>
<p>And then turn around and prosecute them and sue them until they bleed out of every orifice!!</p>
<p>This moron is no different than the moron who want to "arrest" Karl Rove or Dick Cheney or Tony Blair..</p>
<p>Morons..  Ignorant morons...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64480</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64480</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I was wrong.. It wasn&#039;t 75%...

Sanders is saying 90%... :D

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?? :D&lt;/I&gt;

Says the guy who just admitted he was wrong..  :D

I guess that&#039;s the core different between me and and most everyone else...

I have no problem admitting when I am wrong when the facts clearly show I am.... 

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I was wrong.. It wasn't 75%...</p>
<p>Sanders is saying 90%... :D</p>
<p>Do you ever get tired of being wrong?? :D</i></p>
<p>Says the guy who just admitted he was wrong..  :D</p>
<p>I guess that's the core different between me and and most everyone else...</p>
<p>I have no problem admitting when I am wrong when the facts clearly show I am.... </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64479</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64479</guid>
		<description>Let me put it to ya this way, Biga...

I take the GOP and the Right Wing ideology to task a HELLUVA lot more than ya&#039;all take the Democrat Party and Left Wing ideology to task...

That bona fide FACT makes me the most non-partisan, un-biased and objective citizen of Weigantia by comparison...

Without me around, Weigantia would simply be an echo chamber where the only &quot;debates&quot; would be &lt;B&gt;&quot;is the Democrat Party REALLY awesome or just awesome??&quot;&lt;/B&gt; and &lt;B&gt;&quot;Is Obama god or just the messenger of god??&quot;&lt;/B&gt;   :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;These are the facts of the case.  And they are undisputed.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Captain &#039;Smilin&#039; Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me put it to ya this way, Biga...</p>
<p>I take the GOP and the Right Wing ideology to task a HELLUVA lot more than ya'all take the Democrat Party and Left Wing ideology to task...</p>
<p>That bona fide FACT makes me the most non-partisan, un-biased and objective citizen of Weigantia by comparison...</p>
<p>Without me around, Weigantia would simply be an echo chamber where the only "debates" would be <b>"is the Democrat Party REALLY awesome or just awesome??"</b> and <b>"Is Obama god or just the messenger of god??"</b>   :D</p>
<p><b>"These are the facts of the case.  And they are undisputed."</b><br />
-Captain 'Smilin' Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64477</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64477</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And, FYI, every comment, every false claim, and all the policies you attack and defend are just oozing with right wing ideology.
You&#039;re not just lying to yourself when you claim otherwise.&lt;/I&gt;

I understand you have to make that claim to save face...  And while it&#039;s true that I do rail against Democrats more than Republicans it&#039;s an established fact that I have slammed the GOP when they made bonehead moves and I have credited Democrats when they done did good...

With one exception none of ya&#039;all can make the counter-part claim.

I am a registered NPA...  I voted for Obama in 2008 fer christ&#039;s sake!

Do not try and project your ideological enslavement on me..  It won&#039;t work...  

My bona fides are too well established for you to question..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And, FYI, every comment, every false claim, and all the policies you attack and defend are just oozing with right wing ideology.<br />
You're not just lying to yourself when you claim otherwise.</i></p>
<p>I understand you have to make that claim to save face...  And while it's true that I do rail against Democrats more than Republicans it's an established fact that I have slammed the GOP when they made bonehead moves and I have credited Democrats when they done did good...</p>
<p>With one exception none of ya'all can make the counter-part claim.</p>
<p>I am a registered NPA...  I voted for Obama in 2008 fer christ's sake!</p>
<p>Do not try and project your ideological enslavement on me..  It won't work...  </p>
<p>My bona fides are too well established for you to question..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64476</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64476</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s forget all the melodrama for a second...  Let&#039;s also forget all partisan ideology, if that is even possible for ya&#039;all...

I have a serious question and would like a serious answer..

I would like ya&#039;all&#039;s version of the thought process you believe Hillary used to come to the conclusion that a private insecure bathroom installed email server for a United States Secretary of State to use was a good idea..

I mean, step outside your Democrat Party chains and look at the issue logically and rationally...

How could ANYONE in their right mind think that this was a good idea??

I truly would like to know what ya&#039;all think about that...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's forget all the melodrama for a second...  Let's also forget all partisan ideology, if that is even possible for ya'all...</p>
<p>I have a serious question and would like a serious answer..</p>
<p>I would like ya'all's version of the thought process you believe Hillary used to come to the conclusion that a private insecure bathroom installed email server for a United States Secretary of State to use was a good idea..</p>
<p>I mean, step outside your Democrat Party chains and look at the issue logically and rationally...</p>
<p>How could ANYONE in their right mind think that this was a good idea??</p>
<p>I truly would like to know what ya'all think about that...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64475</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64475</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;FBI Said to Recover Personal E-Mails From Hillary Clinton Server&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-22/fbi-said-to-recover-personal-e-mails-from-hillary-clinton-server

Are ya&#039;all SURE ya&#039;all don&#039;t want to concede Hillary&#039;s &quot;Toast Factor&quot;??   :D

Barring any Machiavellian 12-Dimensional Chess games by Hillary (a long-shot)  Hillary is going down..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>FBI Said to Recover Personal E-Mails From Hillary Clinton Server</b><br />
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-22/fbi-said-to-recover-personal-e-mails-from-hillary-clinton-server" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-22/fbi-said-to-recover-personal-e-mails-from-hillary-clinton-server</a></p>
<p>Are ya'all SURE ya'all don't want to concede Hillary's "Toast Factor"??   :D</p>
<p>Barring any Machiavellian 12-Dimensional Chess games by Hillary (a long-shot)  Hillary is going down..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64474</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64474</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As for your example about how income is spent, I have never seen such utter nonsense in my life..&lt;/I&gt;

TRANSLATION: I have no rational or logical response to the facts and to the reality... 

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As for your example about how income is spent, I have never seen such utter nonsense in my life..</i></p>
<p>TRANSLATION: I have no rational or logical response to the facts and to the reality... </p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64473</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64473</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As for your example about how income is spent, I have never seen such utter nonsense in my life. It&#039;s complete bull, start to finish. It is so divorced from reality it makes no sense even as an imagined theoretical argument.&lt;/I&gt;

TRANSLATION: I have no rational or logical response to the facts and to the reality... 

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As for your example about how income is spent, I have never seen such utter nonsense in my life. It's complete bull, start to finish. It is so divorced from reality it makes no sense even as an imagined theoretical argument.</i></p>
<p>TRANSLATION: I have no rational or logical response to the facts and to the reality... </p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64472</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64472</guid>
		<description>Biga,

I was wrong..  It wasn&#039;t 75%...

Sanders is saying 90%...  :D

Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biga,</p>
<p>I was wrong..  It wasn't 75%...</p>
<p>Sanders is saying 90%...  :D</p>
<p>Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64471</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64471</guid>
		<description>Biga,

&lt;I&gt;Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.&lt;/I&gt;

Yer right. Sanders is saying 90%...  :D

&lt;B&gt;Bernie Sanders Would Tax The Income Of The Wealthiest Americans At 90 Percent&lt;/B&gt;

Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biga,</p>
<p><i>Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.</i></p>
<p>Yer right. Sanders is saying 90%...  :D</p>
<p><b>Bernie Sanders Would Tax The Income Of The Wealthiest Americans At 90 Percent</b></p>
<p>Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64470</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64470</guid>
		<description>Biga,

&lt;I&gt;Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.&lt;/I&gt;

Yer right. Sanders is saying 90%...  :D

&lt;B&gt;Bernie Sanders Would Tax The Income Of The Wealthiest Americans At 90 Percent&lt;/B&gt;
http://tinyurl.com/nsm6546

Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biga,</p>
<p><i>Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.</i></p>
<p>Yer right. Sanders is saying 90%...  :D</p>
<p><b>Bernie Sanders Would Tax The Income Of The Wealthiest Americans At 90 Percent</b><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/nsm6546" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nsm6546</a></p>
<p>Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64469</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64469</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;And, Vice President Joe Biden could be the antidote or just what the doctor ordered. If he enters the race, that is, which I still believe is not likely.&lt;/I&gt;

Not if he continues Obama&#039;s legacy of doing what he wants, regardless of what the American people want...

Every major initiative that Obama has pushed, from TrainWreckCare thru the Trade Deals to The Iran Giveaway, the American people have been completely and unequivocally against..

If Biden can&#039;t remember that, as POTUS he works FOR the American people, he will be as bad as Obama...

&lt;I&gt;You may use &quot;uncle Joe&quot; as a term of endearment but, too many others use it to dismiss and denigrate his career as an honourable politician, public servant and statesman. Use it as you will.&lt;/I&gt;

Danke..  I&#039;ll use it sparingly..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>And, Vice President Joe Biden could be the antidote or just what the doctor ordered. If he enters the race, that is, which I still believe is not likely.</i></p>
<p>Not if he continues Obama's legacy of doing what he wants, regardless of what the American people want...</p>
<p>Every major initiative that Obama has pushed, from TrainWreckCare thru the Trade Deals to The Iran Giveaway, the American people have been completely and unequivocally against..</p>
<p>If Biden can't remember that, as POTUS he works FOR the American people, he will be as bad as Obama...</p>
<p><i>You may use "uncle Joe" as a term of endearment but, too many others use it to dismiss and denigrate his career as an honourable politician, public servant and statesman. Use it as you will.</i></p>
<p>Danke..  I'll use it sparingly..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64468</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64468</guid>
		<description>Biga,

&lt;I&gt;Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.&lt;/I&gt;

Yer right. Sanders is saying 90%...  :D

&lt;B&gt;Bernie Sanders Would Tax The Income Of The Wealthiest Americans At 90 Percent&lt;/B&gt;
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/05/26/3662773/sanders-90-percent-tax/

Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biga,</p>
<p><i>Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.</i></p>
<p>Yer right. Sanders is saying 90%...  :D</p>
<p><b>Bernie Sanders Would Tax The Income Of The Wealthiest Americans At 90 Percent</b><br />
<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/05/26/3662773/sanders-90-percent-tax/" rel="nofollow">http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/05/26/3662773/sanders-90-percent-tax/</a></p>
<p>Do you ever get tired of being wrong??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64467</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 03:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64467</guid>
		<description>Michale,

&lt;I&gt;The disease is politics... Politicians are the carriers...And the American people are sick and tired of being sick and tired...&lt;/I&gt;

And, Vice President Joe Biden could be the antidote or just what the doctor ordered. If he enters the race, that is, which I still believe is not likely.

You may use &quot;uncle Joe&quot; as a term of endearment but, too many others use it to dismiss and denigrate his career as an honourable politician, public servant and statesman. Use it as you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p><i>The disease is politics... Politicians are the carriers...And the American people are sick and tired of being sick and tired...</i></p>
<p>And, Vice President Joe Biden could be the antidote or just what the doctor ordered. If he enters the race, that is, which I still believe is not likely.</p>
<p>You may use "uncle Joe" as a term of endearment but, too many others use it to dismiss and denigrate his career as an honourable politician, public servant and statesman. Use it as you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64464</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64464</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Over at HuffPost, Arianna Huffington has formally announced that Trump has run into his Sarah Palin Moment.&lt;/I&gt;

If I had a dollar for every time someone said that Trump has reached his &lt;I&gt;xxxx&lt;/I&gt; &quot;moment&quot;, I could REALLY retire...

Ya&#039;all DON&#039;T get it...

As long as pundits and partisans worry about &quot;moments&quot; and minutiae, people like Trump and Sanders will ALWAYS be popular and strike a cord...

The disease is politics...  Politicians are the carriers...

And the American people are sick and tired of being sick and tired...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Over at HuffPost, Arianna Huffington has formally announced that Trump has run into his Sarah Palin Moment.</i></p>
<p>If I had a dollar for every time someone said that Trump has reached his <i>xxxx</i> "moment", I could REALLY retire...</p>
<p>Ya'all DON'T get it...</p>
<p>As long as pundits and partisans worry about "moments" and minutiae, people like Trump and Sanders will ALWAYS be popular and strike a cord...</p>
<p>The disease is politics...  Politicians are the carriers...</p>
<p>And the American people are sick and tired of being sick and tired...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64463</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64463</guid>
		<description>Micha

Per comment 48

First you question what I said about the working poor... and then you admit it???
Did you backtrack because you researched the facts?

Then you justify stereotyping with unsupported claims that we all do it too???
If it&#039;s wrong, it&#039;s wrong.
Which means you are wrong to do it.

You accept that most of the poor are working poor, but then you continue your stereotyping while limiting it to the fraction of the poor on welfare?
Is that an admission your original stereotyping was unjustified?

Then you refuse to offer any substantive arguments based on a false claim?
&quot;Been there, done that. You bailed&quot;
Uh, no.
I refuted you arguments, and you just kept repeating them as if I hadn&#039;t.

Going back further to comment 32 

You don&#039;t honestly believe you&#039;re the only one with experience when it comes to pot do you?
And I noticed you were a little vague... is that because police statistics show alcohol and hard drugs are waaaaay bigger problems?

Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.
Straw man arguments are beneath even you.
A slight increase in income taxes for the rich is the only income tax proposal. The carried interest elimination and parity for capital gains are being discussed, but haven&#039;t actually made it into any platform for candidates in either party.

Bernie is proposing a tiny transactional tax on trades, but you aren&#039;t arguing about that anywhere.

And since we are talking about a slight increase, I do have a point, and you do not have a point.

And &quot;we&quot;, the United States, adjusting to fewer venture funds offshoring our jobs would indeed be an easy adjustment. The taxes generated from their profits don&#039;t come close to offsetting the lost taxes from the jobs and companies they ravage.
None of that was about &quot;other peoples money&quot; as you falsely claim.

In any case, income and capital gains taxes tax future income and profit, so the rich would indeed stay rich. Your denial of that simple reality is indefensible.

The only tax on already accumulated wealth is the estate tax, and none of the plans offered on the Left include raising it. 

As for your example about how income is spent, I have never seen such utter nonsense in my life. It&#039;s complete bull, start to finish. It is so divorced from reality it makes no sense even as an imagined theoretical argument.

And, FYI, every comment, every false claim, and all the policies you attack and defend are just oozing with right wing ideology. 
You&#039;re not just lying to yourself when you claim otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micha</p>
<p>Per comment 48</p>
<p>First you question what I said about the working poor... and then you admit it???<br />
Did you backtrack because you researched the facts?</p>
<p>Then you justify stereotyping with unsupported claims that we all do it too???<br />
If it's wrong, it's wrong.<br />
Which means you are wrong to do it.</p>
<p>You accept that most of the poor are working poor, but then you continue your stereotyping while limiting it to the fraction of the poor on welfare?<br />
Is that an admission your original stereotyping was unjustified?</p>
<p>Then you refuse to offer any substantive arguments based on a false claim?<br />
"Been there, done that. You bailed"<br />
Uh, no.<br />
I refuted you arguments, and you just kept repeating them as if I hadn't.</p>
<p>Going back further to comment 32 </p>
<p>You don't honestly believe you're the only one with experience when it comes to pot do you?<br />
And I noticed you were a little vague... is that because police statistics show alcohol and hard drugs are waaaaay bigger problems?</p>
<p>Nobody is suggesting a 75% tax... nobody.<br />
Straw man arguments are beneath even you.<br />
A slight increase in income taxes for the rich is the only income tax proposal. The carried interest elimination and parity for capital gains are being discussed, but haven't actually made it into any platform for candidates in either party.</p>
<p>Bernie is proposing a tiny transactional tax on trades, but you aren't arguing about that anywhere.</p>
<p>And since we are talking about a slight increase, I do have a point, and you do not have a point.</p>
<p>And "we", the United States, adjusting to fewer venture funds offshoring our jobs would indeed be an easy adjustment. The taxes generated from their profits don't come close to offsetting the lost taxes from the jobs and companies they ravage.<br />
None of that was about "other peoples money" as you falsely claim.</p>
<p>In any case, income and capital gains taxes tax future income and profit, so the rich would indeed stay rich. Your denial of that simple reality is indefensible.</p>
<p>The only tax on already accumulated wealth is the estate tax, and none of the plans offered on the Left include raising it. </p>
<p>As for your example about how income is spent, I have never seen such utter nonsense in my life. It's complete bull, start to finish. It is so divorced from reality it makes no sense even as an imagined theoretical argument.</p>
<p>And, FYI, every comment, every false claim, and all the policies you attack and defend are just oozing with right wing ideology.<br />
You're not just lying to yourself when you claim otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64462</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64462</guid>
		<description>Over at HuffPost, Arianna Huffington has formally announced that Trump has run into his Sarah Palin Moment. 

Arianna thinks Palin&#039;s Moment was the Katie Couric Interview, I think it was the Turkey Farm Speech, but anyway, some kind of moment seems have happened and The Donald needs to move on before he looks like a loser and further damages his brand(s).

Here&#039;s how I think he does it.  Metaphorically, he takes off the Batman outfit and goes back to being Bruce Wayne at the Manor. He delivers following speech, metaphorically speaking, of course:

&quot;Shsssh, shssh...Citizens of Gotham City.  I have busted a few of the right heads, revived your civic interest and shown you how to retake your own government. I&#039;ve done it all with my own money. Now it&#039;s time for you to control your own destiny. I&#039;ll be watching. If you ever need me, use the Bat Signal.&quot;   The Bat Signal being a searchlight projecting a silhouette of Trump&#039;s head and hair on a low hanging cloud or a Trump Tower, yet again, metaphorically.

Classy.  This being a Trump speech it will have to be longer and more rambling, but this is the basic plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at HuffPost, Arianna Huffington has formally announced that Trump has run into his Sarah Palin Moment. </p>
<p>Arianna thinks Palin's Moment was the Katie Couric Interview, I think it was the Turkey Farm Speech, but anyway, some kind of moment seems have happened and The Donald needs to move on before he looks like a loser and further damages his brand(s).</p>
<p>Here's how I think he does it.  Metaphorically, he takes off the Batman outfit and goes back to being Bruce Wayne at the Manor. He delivers following speech, metaphorically speaking, of course:</p>
<p>"Shsssh, shssh...Citizens of Gotham City.  I have busted a few of the right heads, revived your civic interest and shown you how to retake your own government. I've done it all with my own money. Now it's time for you to control your own destiny. I'll be watching. If you ever need me, use the Bat Signal."   The Bat Signal being a searchlight projecting a silhouette of Trump's head and hair on a low hanging cloud or a Trump Tower, yet again, metaphorically.</p>
<p>Classy.  This being a Trump speech it will have to be longer and more rambling, but this is the basic plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64460</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64460</guid>
		<description>M-67

I thought InTrade did a better job and I preferred them at the time, but alas InTrade was shut down.  

I also consult Ladbrokes regularly, but they are a traditional betting shop, not an exchange.  Ladbrokes uses fractional odds, which are not as fine grained as decimal odds, and are harder to convert into implied probabilities.  

The main reason I like exchanges and bookies is that odds directly convert to Bayesian probabilities of an event occurring/not occurring.
Pollsters don&#039;t do this, although they could in principle: &quot;Sir or madam, please state how likely Joe Biden is be the next President, with O meaning he has no change, 50 meaning he has an even chance of winning, and 100 means he cannot lose.&quot;  I don&#039;t know why they don&#039;t do this, but they don&#039;t, or more accurately, I&#039;ve never encountered it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-67</p>
<p>I thought InTrade did a better job and I preferred them at the time, but alas InTrade was shut down.  </p>
<p>I also consult Ladbrokes regularly, but they are a traditional betting shop, not an exchange.  Ladbrokes uses fractional odds, which are not as fine grained as decimal odds, and are harder to convert into implied probabilities.  </p>
<p>The main reason I like exchanges and bookies is that odds directly convert to Bayesian probabilities of an event occurring/not occurring.<br />
Pollsters don't do this, although they could in principle: "Sir or madam, please state how likely Joe Biden is be the next President, with O meaning he has no change, 50 meaning he has an even chance of winning, and 100 means he cannot lose."  I don't know why they don't do this, but they don't, or more accurately, I've never encountered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64457</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64457</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It would be interesting to know how BetFair did during &lt;/I&gt;

Awww carp...

Missed the chance for a perfectly good pun!   :(


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It would be interesting to know how BetFair did during </i></p>
<p>Awww carp...</p>
<p>Missed the chance for a perfectly good pun!   :(</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64456</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64456</guid>
		<description>M-64

OK, what is the hot key that&#039;s causing accidental posts?  I think that&#039;s the problem....

Bush has stabilized in a gentle glide near 35% implied p of nomination.  Looks a lot like Clinton&#039;s glide slope, but at much lower altitude. Clinton&#039;s implied p nomination still tends to burble around a bit below 70%, she can coast a good while like that without fatal implications.  The negative buzz feedback loop that 538 talks about applies to Bush quite well IMHO.

Fiorina is reaping the rewards of a good debate performance, and Trump helpfully provided her with nice T-balls to hit out of the park.  I don&#039;t think she will wear well.  Candidates who have never held office don&#039;t tend to wear well running for high office.  Politics requires a unique skill set.  Her success in business is, to put it mildly, open to discussion.  When your main defense is a phone call from a famous business dead guy, you have a problem...6th Sense Defense?  Still, she looks likely to catch Trump and take over the 3rd spot.

Still anxiously awaiting two weeks worth of fresh poll data to confirm market trends and snap buzz charts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-64</p>
<p>OK, what is the hot key that's causing accidental posts?  I think that's the problem....</p>
<p>Bush has stabilized in a gentle glide near 35% implied p of nomination.  Looks a lot like Clinton's glide slope, but at much lower altitude. Clinton's implied p nomination still tends to burble around a bit below 70%, she can coast a good while like that without fatal implications.  The negative buzz feedback loop that 538 talks about applies to Bush quite well IMHO.</p>
<p>Fiorina is reaping the rewards of a good debate performance, and Trump helpfully provided her with nice T-balls to hit out of the park.  I don't think she will wear well.  Candidates who have never held office don't tend to wear well running for high office.  Politics requires a unique skill set.  Her success in business is, to put it mildly, open to discussion.  When your main defense is a phone call from a famous business dead guy, you have a problem...6th Sense Defense?  Still, she looks likely to catch Trump and take over the 3rd spot.</p>
<p>Still anxiously awaiting two weeks worth of fresh poll data to confirm market trends and snap buzz charts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64455</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64455</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to know how BetFair did during the 2008 Primary/Election with Obama..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to know how BetFair did during the 2008 Primary/Election with Obama..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64453</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64453</guid>
		<description>M-64

All the indicators I track indicate Carson is in a serious nose dive.  Much steeper than Trump&#039;s. Carson has lost more than half his value on the Betfair nomination market. He nosed over right after the second debate. His implied probability is near 4% as of this morning, Walker punched out 5% - although I suspect Scotty&#039;s financial backers in the rear seats jumped first.  I think Carson is finished, but he&#039;ll probably zombie around for a while.

Rubio is trending up, he looks a solid second to Bush right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-64</p>
<p>All the indicators I track indicate Carson is in a serious nose dive.  Much steeper than Trump's. Carson has lost more than half his value on the Betfair nomination market. He nosed over right after the second debate. His implied probability is near 4% as of this morning, Walker punched out 5% - although I suspect Scotty's financial backers in the rear seats jumped first.  I think Carson is finished, but he'll probably zombie around for a while.</p>
<p>Rubio is trending up, he looks a solid second to Bush right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64447</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64447</guid>
		<description>I also have to concede the &quot;my guy&quot; is out...

Not sure who I am for now..  Obviously Trump has his good points..  But I kinda lean towards Carson..  He&#039;s Trump w/o the arrogance and conceit..

On the other hand,  Rubio is a fellow Floridian..  And his wife is a knock-out...   :D

On the third hand, Fiorina would be a huge, HUGE slap in the fact to the Hysterical (and not so Hysterical) Left..  :D

So many choices...  

I feel for you Democrats..  All you have are old white people..  :D  heh

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have to concede the "my guy" is out...</p>
<p>Not sure who I am for now..  Obviously Trump has his good points..  But I kinda lean towards Carson..  He's Trump w/o the arrogance and conceit..</p>
<p>On the other hand,  Rubio is a fellow Floridian..  And his wife is a knock-out...   :D</p>
<p>On the third hand, Fiorina would be a huge, HUGE slap in the fact to the Hysterical (and not so Hysterical) Left..  :D</p>
<p>So many choices...  </p>
<p>I feel for you Democrats..  All you have are old white people..  :D  heh</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64446</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64446</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;The record&#039;s stuck... The record&#039;s stuck... The record&#039;s stuck...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

:D

However, credit where credit is due..  You did note Walker&#039;s terminal nosedive...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"The record's stuck... The record's stuck... The record's stuck..."</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>However, credit where credit is due..  You did note Walker's terminal nosedive...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64444</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64444</guid>
		<description>M-47

I did note Walker was in a nose dive about a month ago.  Fiorina  was where I went really wrong, saved by the kid&#039;s table, looks like she is poised to overtake Trump.  Trump continues to trend down.  

Jindal, Paul, Graham, why are are they still here?  Cruz, Huck, Kasich  and Christie still have pulses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-47</p>
<p>I did note Walker was in a nose dive about a month ago.  Fiorina  was where I went really wrong, saved by the kid's table, looks like she is poised to overtake Trump.  Trump continues to trend down.  </p>
<p>Jindal, Paul, Graham, why are are they still here?  Cruz, Huck, Kasich  and Christie still have pulses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64445</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64445</guid>
		<description>M-47

I did note Walker was in a nose dive about a month ago.  Fiorina  was where I went really wrong, saved by the kid&#039;s table, looks like she is poised to overtake Trump.  Trump continues to trend down.  

Jindal, Paul, Graham, why are are they still here?  Cruz, Huck, Kasich  and Christie still have pulses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-47</p>
<p>I did note Walker was in a nose dive about a month ago.  Fiorina  was where I went really wrong, saved by the kid's table, looks like she is poised to overtake Trump.  Trump continues to trend down.  </p>
<p>Jindal, Paul, Graham, why are are they still here?  Cruz, Huck, Kasich  and Christie still have pulses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64443</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64443</guid>
		<description>M-47

I did note Walker was in a nose dive about a month ago.  Fiorina  was where I went really wrong, saved by the kid&#039;s table, looks like she is poised to overtake Trump.  Trump continues to trend down.  

Jindal, Paul, Graham, why are are they still here?  Cruz, Huck, Kasich  and Christie still have pulses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-47</p>
<p>I did note Walker was in a nose dive about a month ago.  Fiorina  was where I went really wrong, saved by the kid's table, looks like she is poised to overtake Trump.  Trump continues to trend down.  </p>
<p>Jindal, Paul, Graham, why are are they still here?  Cruz, Huck, Kasich  and Christie still have pulses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64442</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64442</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Biden insiders feel Clinton stalking
The VP’s supporters say Brooklyn is subtly warning him not to run.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/joe-biden-hillary-clinton-2016-213911

Hillary is scared....  :D

And with good reason...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Biden insiders feel Clinton stalking<br />
The VP’s supporters say Brooklyn is subtly warning him not to run.<br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/joe-biden-hillary-clinton-2016-213911" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/joe-biden-hillary-clinton-2016-213911</a></p>
<p>Hillary is scared....  :D</p>
<p>And with good reason...</p>
<p>Michale</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64439</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64439</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Teen prosecuted as adult for having naked images – of himself – on phone
North Carolina high schooler and his girlfriend face legal proceedings over selfies as both the adult perpetrators and minor victims  &lt;/B&gt;
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/20/teen-prosecuted-naked-images-himself-phone-selfies

The first casualty of Zero Tolerance is common sense..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Teen prosecuted as adult for having naked images – of himself – on phone<br />
North Carolina high schooler and his girlfriend face legal proceedings over selfies as both the adult perpetrators and minor victims  </b><br />
<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/20/teen-prosecuted-naked-images-himself-phone-selfies" rel="nofollow">http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/20/teen-prosecuted-naked-images-himself-phone-selfies</a></p>
<p>The first casualty of Zero Tolerance is common sense..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64435</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64435</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;EVERY ideological movement MUST have a scapegoat...

For the Left, it&#039;s the rich...&lt;/I&gt;

Which is why I eschew ideological enslavement and am proudly registered as an N.P.A.   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>EVERY ideological movement MUST have a scapegoat...</p>
<p>For the Left, it's the rich...</i></p>
<p>Which is why I eschew ideological enslavement and am proudly registered as an N.P.A.   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64431</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64431</guid>
		<description>Liz,

But what do you think of the irony of the Democrat Party being the Party of old white people??  

Pretty ironic, eh?  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p>But what do you think of the irony of the Democrat Party being the Party of old white people??  </p>
<p>Pretty ironic, eh?  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64430</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64430</guid>
		<description>JM,

&lt;I&gt;That&#039;s a falsehood perpetuated again by anecdotal evidence. Cite ONE documented example.&lt;/I&gt;

How about 113,000 documented examples??

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ion=1&amp;espv=2&amp;ie=UTF-8#q=EBT+Card+used+for+drugs

&lt;I&gt; Drug testing of welfare recipients that has been done found a lesser percentage of them testing positive, than the general non-welfare population.&lt;/I&gt;

So?? The non-welfare population is NOT receiving welfare, therefore their drug usage is not relevant to the discussion..

 &lt;I&gt;1.) Contrary to popular belief, we have not run out of rich people, nor will we ever do so. &lt;/I&gt;

Despite all the evidence to the contrary..  How many hundreds or thousands of the wealthy have left this country and taken their money elsewhere??

The point is, the STICK IT TO THE RICH mentality that permeates the Leftist ideology is nothing more than very thinly disguised class warfare... 

The Left demonizing the rich is no different than the  the Right demonizing illegal immigrants

EVERY ideological movement MUST have a scapegoat...

For the Left, it&#039;s the rich...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JM,</p>
<p><i>That's a falsehood perpetuated again by anecdotal evidence. Cite ONE documented example.</i></p>
<p>How about 113,000 documented examples??</p>
<p><a href="https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ion=1&amp;espv=2&amp;ie=UTF-8#q=EBT+Card+used+for+drugs" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ion=1&amp;espv=2&amp;ie=UTF-8#q=EBT+Card+used+for+drugs</a></p>
<p><i> Drug testing of welfare recipients that has been done found a lesser percentage of them testing positive, than the general non-welfare population.</i></p>
<p>So?? The non-welfare population is NOT receiving welfare, therefore their drug usage is not relevant to the discussion..</p>
<p> <i>1.) Contrary to popular belief, we have not run out of rich people, nor will we ever do so. </i></p>
<p>Despite all the evidence to the contrary..  How many hundreds or thousands of the wealthy have left this country and taken their money elsewhere??</p>
<p>The point is, the STICK IT TO THE RICH mentality that permeates the Leftist ideology is nothing more than very thinly disguised class warfare... </p>
<p>The Left demonizing the rich is no different than the  the Right demonizing illegal immigrants</p>
<p>EVERY ideological movement MUST have a scapegoat...</p>
<p>For the Left, it's the rich...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64429</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64429</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;I wish you wouldn&#039;t call him &quot;uncle Joe&quot;, Michale.&lt;/I&gt;

It was actually meant as a term of endearment.  But if it bothers you, I will cease...  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>I wish you wouldn't call him "uncle Joe", Michale.</i></p>
<p>It was actually meant as a term of endearment.  But if it bothers you, I will cease...  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64427</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 02:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64427</guid>
		<description>Michale wrote:

&quot;1. The rich become NOT rich and are added to the welfare rolls..

2. The rich get tired of working their asses off for the lazy so they take their money to another country and give a big and mighty FRAK YOU to America...&quot;

1.) Contrary to popular belief, we have not run out of rich people, nor will we ever do so. There are more millionaires now worldwide than ever before in history. Enough people will always aspire to be rich, no matter what. Even in communist countries like North Korea, there are the very wealthy, even by American standards. Just look at the very privileged well off class of the cadre that surround the &quot;Dear Leader&quot; Kim Jong-il.

2.) Which is precisely why you go after and tax offshore accounts like those in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland. Also, even the rich, can&#039;t avoid at least paying sales taxes somewhere. After all, what good is all that money if you can&#039;t even spend it on lots of useless pretty expensive baubles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale wrote:</p>
<p>"1. The rich become NOT rich and are added to the welfare rolls..</p>
<p>2. The rich get tired of working their asses off for the lazy so they take their money to another country and give a big and mighty FRAK YOU to America..."</p>
<p>1.) Contrary to popular belief, we have not run out of rich people, nor will we ever do so. There are more millionaires now worldwide than ever before in history. Enough people will always aspire to be rich, no matter what. Even in communist countries like North Korea, there are the very wealthy, even by American standards. Just look at the very privileged well off class of the cadre that surround the "Dear Leader" Kim Jong-il.</p>
<p>2.) Which is precisely why you go after and tax offshore accounts like those in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland. Also, even the rich, can't avoid at least paying sales taxes somewhere. After all, what good is all that money if you can't even spend it on lots of useless pretty expensive baubles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64426</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 02:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64426</guid>
		<description>Michale wrote:

&quot;What about the ones who aren&#039;t?? What about the ones who use their EBT cards to get cash at strip clubs and buy drugs??&quot;

That&#039;s a falsehood perpetuated again by anecdotal evidence. Cite ONE documented example. Drug testing of welfare recipients that has been done found a lesser percentage of them testing positive, than the general non-welfare population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale wrote:</p>
<p>"What about the ones who aren't?? What about the ones who use their EBT cards to get cash at strip clubs and buy drugs??"</p>
<p>That's a falsehood perpetuated again by anecdotal evidence. Cite ONE documented example. Drug testing of welfare recipients that has been done found a lesser percentage of them testing positive, than the general non-welfare population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64424</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64424</guid>
		<description>I wish you wouldn&#039;t call him &quot;uncle Joe&quot;, Michale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you wouldn't call him "uncle Joe", Michale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64423</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64423</guid>
		<description>Looks like Uncle Joe is going to jump into the race...

Ya gotta love it..

The Democrat Party...  

The Party Of Old White People

Heh


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Uncle Joe is going to jump into the race...</p>
<p>Ya gotta love it..</p>
<p>The Democrat Party...  </p>
<p>The Party Of Old White People</p>
<p>Heh</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64422</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64422</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Most of the poor, are working poor.
Most poor people work hard.&lt;/I&gt;

Fair enough..  For the sake of this discussion, I&#039;ll stipulate that...

What about the ones who aren&#039;t??  What about the ones who use their EBT cards to get cash at strip clubs and buy drugs??

Why won&#039;t the Left crack down on them??

Because the lazy greedy morons vote Democrat... 

THAT&#039;S why...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Most of the poor, are working poor.<br />
Most poor people work hard.</i></p>
<p>Fair enough..  For the sake of this discussion, I'll stipulate that...</p>
<p>What about the ones who aren't??  What about the ones who use their EBT cards to get cash at strip clubs and buy drugs??</p>
<p>Why won't the Left crack down on them??</p>
<p>Because the lazy greedy morons vote Democrat... </p>
<p>THAT'S why...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64421</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64421</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;If you start with a false assumption, it leads nowhere.&lt;/I&gt;

It wasn&#039;t an assumption.  It was a predication...  A chance for ya&#039;all to acknowledge that you CAN think logically and rationally instead of emotionally..

In your case... Epic Fail..

&lt;I&gt;Most of the poor, are working poor.
Most poor people work hard.
Very hard.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea??  Prove it...

&lt;I&gt;Few of the professions the working poor hold qualify as easy, and laziness doesn&#039;t go over well with any employer.&lt;/I&gt;

Which is why the lazy are on welfare..  

&lt;B&gt;Doy.....&lt;/B&gt;
-Vanillope Von Schweetz, WRECK IT RALPH

:D

&lt;I&gt;Stereotyping all poor people based on the actions of the few is not economics.&lt;/I&gt;

You mean, like ya&#039;all stereotype anyone who isn&#039;t ideologically pure??  :D

&lt;I&gt;An anecdotal example doesn&#039;t prove anything.
Try and back it up with a substantive argument.&lt;/I&gt;

Been there, done that.. You bailed...   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you start with a false assumption, it leads nowhere.</i></p>
<p>It wasn't an assumption.  It was a predication...  A chance for ya'all to acknowledge that you CAN think logically and rationally instead of emotionally..</p>
<p>In your case... Epic Fail..</p>
<p><i>Most of the poor, are working poor.<br />
Most poor people work hard.<br />
Very hard.</i></p>
<p>Yea??  Prove it...</p>
<p><i>Few of the professions the working poor hold qualify as easy, and laziness doesn't go over well with any employer.</i></p>
<p>Which is why the lazy are on welfare..  </p>
<p><b>Doy.....</b><br />
-Vanillope Von Schweetz, WRECK IT RALPH</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p><i>Stereotyping all poor people based on the actions of the few is not economics.</i></p>
<p>You mean, like ya'all stereotype anyone who isn't ideologically pure??  :D</p>
<p><i>An anecdotal example doesn't prove anything.<br />
Try and back it up with a substantive argument.</i></p>
<p>Been there, done that.. You bailed...   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64420</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64420</guid>
		<description>Walker&#039;s out...

Looks like no one called it..  :D

heh

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walker's out...</p>
<p>Looks like no one called it..  :D</p>
<p>heh</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64419</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64419</guid>
		<description>Micha

&quot;Assume the &quot;poor&quot; are lazy good-for-nothing grasshoppers who just leech off the hard work of the ants....
Given this, why should the ants continue to give and give and give??&quot;

Someone around here recently said something about assuming... oh yeah, it was you.

If you start with a false assumption, it leads nowhere.
Most of the poor, are working poor.
Most poor people work hard.
Very hard.

Few of the professions the working poor hold qualify as easy, and laziness doesn&#039;t go over well with any employer.

Stereotyping all poor people based on the actions of the few is not economics.

Likewise, the &quot;if I can do it, they can do it&quot; argument isn&#039;t the least bit factual.
An anecdotal example doesn&#039;t prove anything.
Try and back it up with a substantive argument.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micha</p>
<p>"Assume the "poor" are lazy good-for-nothing grasshoppers who just leech off the hard work of the ants....<br />
Given this, why should the ants continue to give and give and give??"</p>
<p>Someone around here recently said something about assuming... oh yeah, it was you.</p>
<p>If you start with a false assumption, it leads nowhere.<br />
Most of the poor, are working poor.<br />
Most poor people work hard.<br />
Very hard.</p>
<p>Few of the professions the working poor hold qualify as easy, and laziness doesn't go over well with any employer.</p>
<p>Stereotyping all poor people based on the actions of the few is not economics.</p>
<p>Likewise, the "if I can do it, they can do it" argument isn't the least bit factual.<br />
An anecdotal example doesn't prove anything.<br />
Try and back it up with a substantive argument.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64418</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64418</guid>
		<description>http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/09/20/smart-colorado-hearing-from-hundreds-hundreds-of-parents-about-pot-use/

Remind me again how there is no down side to marijuana legalization??

I seem to have forgotten amongst all the deaths and hospitalizations...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/09/20/smart-colorado-hearing-from-hundreds-hundreds-of-parents-about-pot-use/" rel="nofollow">http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/09/20/smart-colorado-hearing-from-hundreds-hundreds-of-parents-about-pot-use/</a></p>
<p>Remind me again how there is no down side to marijuana legalization??</p>
<p>I seem to have forgotten amongst all the deaths and hospitalizations...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64417</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64417</guid>
		<description>Oh this is just TOO sweet!!  :D

Hillary and Obama went gaga over a kid in Texas who &quot;built&quot; an alarm clock and took it to school....

Turns out the kid just disassembled a 1980s Radio Shack clock and put it in a carry case!!!

hehehehehehehehehehehe

The Leader and Wanna-bee leader of the free world...

In all their moronic glory!!!

You just CAN&#039;T make this stuff up!!   :D

All we needed to make it perfect was for Obama to say, &lt;B&gt;&quot;The cops acted stupidly&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh this is just TOO sweet!!  :D</p>
<p>Hillary and Obama went gaga over a kid in Texas who "built" an alarm clock and took it to school....</p>
<p>Turns out the kid just disassembled a 1980s Radio Shack clock and put it in a carry case!!!</p>
<p>hehehehehehehehehehehe</p>
<p>The Leader and Wanna-bee leader of the free world...</p>
<p>In all their moronic glory!!!</p>
<p>You just CAN'T make this stuff up!!   :D</p>
<p>All we needed to make it perfect was for Obama to say, <b>"The cops acted stupidly"</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64416</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64416</guid>
		<description>And in other news...


&lt;B&gt;Former &#039;Star Trek: Voyager&#039; actress charged with indecent exposure in Tennessee&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/09/16/former-star-trek-voyager-actress-charged-with-indecent-exposure-in-tennessee/?intcmp=ob_article_sidebar_video&amp;intcmp=obinsite

Oh Kes, Kes, Kes... You should have stayed on Ocampa....  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in other news...</p>
<p><b>Former 'Star Trek: Voyager' actress charged with indecent exposure in Tennessee</b><br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/09/16/former-star-trek-voyager-actress-charged-with-indecent-exposure-in-tennessee/?intcmp=ob_article_sidebar_video&amp;intcmp=obinsite" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/09/16/former-star-trek-voyager-actress-charged-with-indecent-exposure-in-tennessee/?intcmp=ob_article_sidebar_video&amp;intcmp=obinsite</a></p>
<p>Oh Kes, Kes, Kes... You should have stayed on Ocampa....  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64415</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64415</guid>
		<description>Re-approachment with Cuba??

&lt;B&gt;Dissidents arrested as Pope Francis celebrates his first Mass in Cuba
Pope Francis meets with Fidel Castro in Havana, after an outdoor mass attended by tens of thousands of people in the capital&#039;s Revolution Square&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/cuba/11878383/Dissidents-arrested-as-Pope-Francis-celebrates-his-first-Mass-in-Cuba.html

Yea... GREAT idea..  :^/

Once again, if the choice for the Left is between principles &amp; integrity and Obama&#039;s ego/agenda??

Obama&#039;s ego wins every time...

The Left has absolutely NO MORAL FOUNDATION to preach to others about human rights...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-approachment with Cuba??</p>
<p><b>Dissidents arrested as Pope Francis celebrates his first Mass in Cuba<br />
Pope Francis meets with Fidel Castro in Havana, after an outdoor mass attended by tens of thousands of people in the capital's Revolution Square</b><br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/cuba/11878383/Dissidents-arrested-as-Pope-Francis-celebrates-his-first-Mass-in-Cuba.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/cuba/11878383/Dissidents-arrested-as-Pope-Francis-celebrates-his-first-Mass-in-Cuba.html</a></p>
<p>Yea... GREAT idea..  :^/</p>
<p>Once again, if the choice for the Left is between principles &amp; integrity and Obama's ego/agenda??</p>
<p>Obama's ego wins every time...</p>
<p>The Left has absolutely NO MORAL FOUNDATION to preach to others about human rights...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64414</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64414</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;More good Obamacare data is in&lt;/I&gt;

Really???

&lt;B&gt;Bipartisan Effort Fights Health Law Rule That Could Raise Premiums&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/us/bipartisan-effort-fights-health-law-rule-that-could-raise-premiums.html?_r=0

You can cherry pick all the good news you want..  It still won&#039;t erase the fact that there is tons more BAD news about TrainWreckCare...

&lt;B&gt;Sabrina Corlette, a consumer advocate and professor at the Health Policy Institute of Georgetown University, said the new definition might be “more trouble than it’s worth.” The main risk, she said, is that “premium rates for many midsize employers will rise, perhaps significantly.”

Alissa Fox, a senior vice president of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, said that “about two-thirds of midsize employers can expect substantial rate increases” after the new rules take effect. Congress needs to act soon, she said, because many employers decide in September and October on the coverage they will offer employees in the coming year.&lt;/B&gt;

So, remind me again how The AFFORDABLE Care Act is.. well.. yunno...  &lt;B&gt;AFFORDABLE???&lt;/B&gt;

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>More good Obamacare data is in</i></p>
<p>Really???</p>
<p><b>Bipartisan Effort Fights Health Law Rule That Could Raise Premiums</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/us/bipartisan-effort-fights-health-law-rule-that-could-raise-premiums.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/us/bipartisan-effort-fights-health-law-rule-that-could-raise-premiums.html?_r=0</a></p>
<p>You can cherry pick all the good news you want..  It still won't erase the fact that there is tons more BAD news about TrainWreckCare...</p>
<p><b>Sabrina Corlette, a consumer advocate and professor at the Health Policy Institute of Georgetown University, said the new definition might be “more trouble than it’s worth.” The main risk, she said, is that “premium rates for many midsize employers will rise, perhaps significantly.”</p>
<p>Alissa Fox, a senior vice president of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, said that “about two-thirds of midsize employers can expect substantial rate increases” after the new rules take effect. Congress needs to act soon, she said, because many employers decide in September and October on the coverage they will offer employees in the coming year.</b></p>
<p>So, remind me again how The AFFORDABLE Care Act is.. well.. yunno...  <b>AFFORDABLE???</b></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64413</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64413</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Pope Francis Is Wrong about Air Conditioning&lt;/B&gt;
http://tinyurl.com/nhlhj4p

This is why the pope is as much of a hypocrite as any Left wing zealot...

&lt;B&gt;...another study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that labor productivity peaks at 65 degrees fahrenheit and decreases by around 15 percent every time the temperature rises by 10 degrees. &lt;/B&gt;

That explains a LOT....   

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Pope Francis Is Wrong about Air Conditioning</b><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/nhlhj4p" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nhlhj4p</a></p>
<p>This is why the pope is as much of a hypocrite as any Left wing zealot...</p>
<p><b>...another study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that labor productivity peaks at 65 degrees fahrenheit and decreases by around 15 percent every time the temperature rises by 10 degrees. </b></p>
<p>That explains a LOT....   </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64412</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64412</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Pope Francis Is Wrong about Air Conditioning&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/pope-francis-air-conditioning-climate-change-encyclical

This is why the pope is as much of a hypocrite as any Left wing zealot...

&lt;B&gt;...another study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that labor productivity peaks at 65 degrees fahrenheit and decreases by around 15 percent every time the temperature rises by 10 degrees. &lt;/B&gt;

That explains a LOT....   

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Pope Francis Is Wrong about Air Conditioning</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/article/pope-francis-air-conditioning-climate-change-encyclical" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalreview.com/article/pope-francis-air-conditioning-climate-change-encyclical</a></p>
<p>This is why the pope is as much of a hypocrite as any Left wing zealot...</p>
<p><b>...another study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that labor productivity peaks at 65 degrees fahrenheit and decreases by around 15 percent every time the temperature rises by 10 degrees. </b></p>
<p>That explains a LOT....   </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64411</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64411</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Someone on Salon says&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;Anybody who has been following election trends in recent years knows that the GOP is the political party that specializes in tilting voting rules to try to shape the outcome. &lt;/B&gt;

Whew!  Bigot much???  :D

Interesting article...  

&lt;B&gt;Humans are odd. They think order and chaos are somehow opposites and try to control what won&#039;t be. But there is grace in their failings. I think you missed that.&lt;/B&gt;
-Vision, AVENGERS AGE OF ULTRON

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Someone on Salon says</i></p>
<p><b>Anybody who has been following election trends in recent years knows that the GOP is the political party that specializes in tilting voting rules to try to shape the outcome. </b></p>
<p>Whew!  Bigot much???  :D</p>
<p>Interesting article...  </p>
<p><b>Humans are odd. They think order and chaos are somehow opposites and try to control what won't be. But there is grace in their failings. I think you missed that.</b><br />
-Vision, AVENGERS AGE OF ULTRON</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64410</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64410</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Others have jumped the gun and I may be the next goat. I think a prognosticator should be, no, must be, willing to take a risk and try to beat the pack....&lt;/I&gt;

I completely agree..  Remember my SCOTUS predictions??  :D

The way I look at it is, if I am wrong, who cares??  Par for the course..

But if I am right?? I would be looked upon with awe...   :D

&lt;I&gt;and state the reasons for bolting. No risk, no fun. Feel free to razz if and when it comes to it.&lt;/I&gt;

Awww, I would NEVER do that.....  Much...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Others have jumped the gun and I may be the next goat. I think a prognosticator should be, no, must be, willing to take a risk and try to beat the pack....</i></p>
<p>I completely agree..  Remember my SCOTUS predictions??  :D</p>
<p>The way I look at it is, if I am wrong, who cares??  Par for the course..</p>
<p>But if I am right?? I would be looked upon with awe...   :D</p>
<p><i>and state the reasons for bolting. No risk, no fun. Feel free to razz if and when it comes to it.</i></p>
<p>Awww, I would NEVER do that.....  Much...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64409</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64409</guid>
		<description>Someone on Salon &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/2015/09/20/how_gop_party_bosses_will_rig_the_system_to_keep_trump_from_winning_partner/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; that if Trump wins the primaries and caucuses, the Establishment faction will have the national convention ignore the votes and nominate someone else regardless.  In the comments there, I say hogwash.  Another commenter says it&#039;s happened in both parties.  Anyone know what the actual history says?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone on Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2015/09/20/how_gop_party_bosses_will_rig_the_system_to_keep_trump_from_winning_partner/" rel="nofollow">says</a> that if Trump wins the primaries and caucuses, the Establishment faction will have the national convention ignore the votes and nominate someone else regardless.  In the comments there, I say hogwash.  Another commenter says it's happened in both parties.  Anyone know what the actual history says?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64408</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64408</guid>
		<description>M-29

Others have jumped the gun and I may be the next goat.  I think a prognosticator should be, no, must be, willing to take a risk and try to beat the pack....and state the reasons for bolting.  No risk, no fun.   Feel free to razz if and when it comes to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-29</p>
<p>Others have jumped the gun and I may be the next goat.  I think a prognosticator should be, no, must be, willing to take a risk and try to beat the pack....and state the reasons for bolting.  No risk, no fun.   Feel free to razz if and when it comes to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64407</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64407</guid>
		<description>Let me ask ya&#039;all something..

Assume the &quot;poor&quot; are lazy good-for-nothing grasshoppers who just leech off the hard work of the ants....

Given this, why should the ants continue to give and give and give??

It seems that the Left just wants to take money from those that EARNED it and give it to those who are too lazy to earn it and, in the process make the lazy dependent on the government for a free ride, thereby insuring that the lazy will continue to vote Democrat...

The Democrat Party was the Party of enslavement...

Seems to me that the Party just found a different set of chains and whips....

Of course, what do I know.. I ran a company that made 3.8 million (or was it 2.8 million??) the first year and now own my own computer/TV shop that has a clientele that numbers in the thousands...

And guess what??  I did all that IN SPITE of the Democrat government..  

Not BECAUSE of it...

If *I* can do something like that, *ANYONE* can... 

Anyone, that is, not looking for a handout and a free ride...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me ask ya'all something..</p>
<p>Assume the "poor" are lazy good-for-nothing grasshoppers who just leech off the hard work of the ants....</p>
<p>Given this, why should the ants continue to give and give and give??</p>
<p>It seems that the Left just wants to take money from those that EARNED it and give it to those who are too lazy to earn it and, in the process make the lazy dependent on the government for a free ride, thereby insuring that the lazy will continue to vote Democrat...</p>
<p>The Democrat Party was the Party of enslavement...</p>
<p>Seems to me that the Party just found a different set of chains and whips....</p>
<p>Of course, what do I know.. I ran a company that made 3.8 million (or was it 2.8 million??) the first year and now own my own computer/TV shop that has a clientele that numbers in the thousands...</p>
<p>And guess what??  I did all that IN SPITE of the Democrat government..  </p>
<p>Not BECAUSE of it...</p>
<p>If *I* can do something like that, *ANYONE* can... </p>
<p>Anyone, that is, not looking for a handout and a free ride...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64406</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64406</guid>
		<description>BigA,

Yer gonna have to wait til CW rescues my comment from NNL...  

But, trust me.  It&#039;s worth waiting for!!  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigA,</p>
<p>Yer gonna have to wait til CW rescues my comment from NNL...  </p>
<p>But, trust me.  It's worth waiting for!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64405</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64405</guid>
		<description>BigA,

&lt;I&gt;Actually, it was an agenda unsupported by the facts that criminalized pot in the first place, so I don&#039;t think anybody will give you a hard time about coming around.&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s what you say..  But those with the facts apparently felt differently.. 

Remember, you are talking to a guy who has seen first hand the destruction and suffering that a &quot;safe&quot; drug like marijuana has caused...  

Once again, the difference between reading about something and actually experiencing it...

&lt;I&gt;As for the tax loophole, the rich will stay rich,&lt;/I&gt;

No matter what???

So, if we tax the rich at 75%, as some Leftist morons have suggested, the rich is going to stay rich??? 

On what planet??

 &lt;I&gt;and a &quot;fair share&quot; would be roughly what everyone else pays... see definition of &quot;fair&quot;.&lt;/I&gt;

So,  let&#039;s say I make 10,000 dollars...  I take 80% of that and use it to help other businesses get started and charities that help the poor....

I have $2000 that I use for my own lifestyle...

You make 10,000 and you buy all sorts of goodies and gadgets for yourself and take vacations, all for yourself...

And you are saying that it&#039;s &quot;fair&quot; that we both pay the same tax on the same 10,000???

How, exactly, is that &quot;fair&quot;???

I use my 10,000 to help other people...

You use your 10,000 on yourself and that&#039;s it...

You see your dilemma???

You can&#039;t define &quot;fair&quot; because there are so many many MANY possible variables and variations..

As I have said time and time again, when it comes to economics I am pretty much a knuckle-dragging ground pounder....

BUT....

But I do known common sense..

And common sense dictates that it&#039;s utterly rid-donk-ulus to establish &quot;fair&quot; based SOLELY on income with absolutely NO THOUGHT to how that &quot;income&quot; becomes outlay...

&lt;I&gt;If a slight increase in taxes causes these shirkers to quit working their offshoring, wage cutting, benefit eliminating, pension raiding, downsizing business model... &lt;/I&gt;

If we were talking about a &quot;slight increase&quot; you would have a point..

But, we&#039;re not, so you don&#039;t...

&lt;I&gt;I think we will adjust quite easily.&lt;/I&gt;

&quot;WE&quot;???

You are pretty free and easy with other people&#039;s money..

Why don&#039;t YOU personally subsidize other people who don&#039;t want to work...

You might be a little less free and easy with that &quot;WE&quot;, eh??  :D

&lt;I&gt; but unfortunately, I&#039;d bet there will still be plenty of money in it to incentivize them.&lt;/I&gt;

And when the Leftist morons want to take MORE and MORE???  And you know they will...  

How much is enough???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigA,</p>
<p><i>Actually, it was an agenda unsupported by the facts that criminalized pot in the first place, so I don't think anybody will give you a hard time about coming around.</i></p>
<p>That's what you say..  But those with the facts apparently felt differently.. </p>
<p>Remember, you are talking to a guy who has seen first hand the destruction and suffering that a "safe" drug like marijuana has caused...  </p>
<p>Once again, the difference between reading about something and actually experiencing it...</p>
<p><i>As for the tax loophole, the rich will stay rich,</i></p>
<p>No matter what???</p>
<p>So, if we tax the rich at 75%, as some Leftist morons have suggested, the rich is going to stay rich??? </p>
<p>On what planet??</p>
<p> <i>and a "fair share" would be roughly what everyone else pays... see definition of "fair".</i></p>
<p>So,  let's say I make 10,000 dollars...  I take 80% of that and use it to help other businesses get started and charities that help the poor....</p>
<p>I have $2000 that I use for my own lifestyle...</p>
<p>You make 10,000 and you buy all sorts of goodies and gadgets for yourself and take vacations, all for yourself...</p>
<p>And you are saying that it's "fair" that we both pay the same tax on the same 10,000???</p>
<p>How, exactly, is that "fair"???</p>
<p>I use my 10,000 to help other people...</p>
<p>You use your 10,000 on yourself and that's it...</p>
<p>You see your dilemma???</p>
<p>You can't define "fair" because there are so many many MANY possible variables and variations..</p>
<p>As I have said time and time again, when it comes to economics I am pretty much a knuckle-dragging ground pounder....</p>
<p>BUT....</p>
<p>But I do known common sense..</p>
<p>And common sense dictates that it's utterly rid-donk-ulus to establish "fair" based SOLELY on income with absolutely NO THOUGHT to how that "income" becomes outlay...</p>
<p><i>If a slight increase in taxes causes these shirkers to quit working their offshoring, wage cutting, benefit eliminating, pension raiding, downsizing business model... </i></p>
<p>If we were talking about a "slight increase" you would have a point..</p>
<p>But, we're not, so you don't...</p>
<p><i>I think we will adjust quite easily.</i></p>
<p>"WE"???</p>
<p>You are pretty free and easy with other people's money..</p>
<p>Why don't YOU personally subsidize other people who don't want to work...</p>
<p>You might be a little less free and easy with that "WE", eh??  :D</p>
<p><i> but unfortunately, I'd bet there will still be plenty of money in it to incentivize them.</i></p>
<p>And when the Leftist morons want to take MORE and MORE???  And you know they will...  </p>
<p>How much is enough???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64404</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64404</guid>
		<description>TS,

&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m feeling more secure about the &quot;Trump has hit his high water mark&quot; limb I decided to walk onto after the last debate.&lt;/I&gt;

This is... what??  The third??  Fourth &quot;high water mark&quot; for Trump???

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TS,</p>
<p><i>I'm feeling more secure about the "Trump has hit his high water mark" limb I decided to walk onto after the last debate.</i></p>
<p>This is... what??  The third??  Fourth "high water mark" for Trump???</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64403</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64403</guid>
		<description>TS,

&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m feeling more secure about the &quot;Trump has hit his high water mark&quot; limb I decided to walk onto after the last debate.&lt;/I&gt;

This is... what??  The third??  Fourth &quot;high water mark&quot; for Trump???

:D

BigA,

&lt;I&gt;Actually, it was an agenda unsupported by the facts that criminalized pot in the first place, so I don&#039;t think anybody will give you a hard time about coming around.&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s what you say..  But those with the facts apparently felt differently.. 

Remember, you are talking to a guy who has seen first hand the destruction and suffering that a &quot;safe&quot; drug like marijuana has caused...  

Once again, the difference between reading about something and actually experiencing it...

&lt;I&gt;As for the tax loophole, the rich will stay rich,&lt;/I&gt;

No matter what???

So, if we tax the rich at 75%, as some Leftist morons have suggested, the rich is going to stay rich??? 

On what planet??

 &lt;I&gt;and a &quot;fair share&quot; would be roughly what everyone else pays... see definition of &quot;fair&quot;.&lt;/I&gt;

So,  let&#039;s say I make 10,000 dollars...  I take 80% of that and use it to help other businesses get started and charities that help the poor....

I have $2000 that I use for my own lifestyle...

You make 10,000 and you buy all sorts of goodies and gadgets for yourself and take vacations, all for yourself...

And you are saying that it&#039;s &quot;fair&quot; that we both pay the same tax on the same 10,000???

How, exactly, is that &quot;fair&quot;???

I use my 10,000 to help other people...

You use your 10,000 on yourself and that&#039;s it...

You see your dilemma???

You can&#039;t define &quot;fair&quot; because there are so many many MANY possible variables and variations..

As I have said time and time again, when it comes to economics I am pretty much a knuckle-dragging ground pounder....

BUT....

But I do known common sense..

And common sense dictates that it&#039;s utterly rid-donk-ulus to establish &quot;fair&quot; based SOLELY on income with absolutely NO THOUGHT to how that &quot;income&quot; becomes outlay...

&lt;I&gt;If a slight increase in taxes causes these shirkers to quit working their offshoring, wage cutting, benefit eliminating, pension raiding, downsizing business model... &lt;/I&gt;

If we were talking about a &quot;slight increase&quot; you would have a point..

But, we&#039;re not, so you don&#039;t...

&lt;I&gt;I think we will adjust quite easily.&lt;/I&gt;

&quot;WE&quot;???

You are pretty free and easy with other people&#039;s money..

Why don&#039;t YOU personally subsidize other people who don&#039;t want to work...

You might be a little less free and easy with that &quot;WE&quot;, eh??  :D

&lt;I&gt; but unfortunately, I&#039;d bet there will still be plenty of money in it to incentivize them.&lt;/I&gt;

And when the Leftist morons want to take MORE and MORE???  And you know they will...  

How much is enough???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TS,</p>
<p><i>I'm feeling more secure about the "Trump has hit his high water mark" limb I decided to walk onto after the last debate.</i></p>
<p>This is... what??  The third??  Fourth "high water mark" for Trump???</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>BigA,</p>
<p><i>Actually, it was an agenda unsupported by the facts that criminalized pot in the first place, so I don't think anybody will give you a hard time about coming around.</i></p>
<p>That's what you say..  But those with the facts apparently felt differently.. </p>
<p>Remember, you are talking to a guy who has seen first hand the destruction and suffering that a "safe" drug like marijuana has caused...  </p>
<p>Once again, the difference between reading about something and actually experiencing it...</p>
<p><i>As for the tax loophole, the rich will stay rich,</i></p>
<p>No matter what???</p>
<p>So, if we tax the rich at 75%, as some Leftist morons have suggested, the rich is going to stay rich??? </p>
<p>On what planet??</p>
<p> <i>and a "fair share" would be roughly what everyone else pays... see definition of "fair".</i></p>
<p>So,  let's say I make 10,000 dollars...  I take 80% of that and use it to help other businesses get started and charities that help the poor....</p>
<p>I have $2000 that I use for my own lifestyle...</p>
<p>You make 10,000 and you buy all sorts of goodies and gadgets for yourself and take vacations, all for yourself...</p>
<p>And you are saying that it's "fair" that we both pay the same tax on the same 10,000???</p>
<p>How, exactly, is that "fair"???</p>
<p>I use my 10,000 to help other people...</p>
<p>You use your 10,000 on yourself and that's it...</p>
<p>You see your dilemma???</p>
<p>You can't define "fair" because there are so many many MANY possible variables and variations..</p>
<p>As I have said time and time again, when it comes to economics I am pretty much a knuckle-dragging ground pounder....</p>
<p>BUT....</p>
<p>But I do known common sense..</p>
<p>And common sense dictates that it's utterly rid-donk-ulus to establish "fair" based SOLELY on income with absolutely NO THOUGHT to how that "income" becomes outlay...</p>
<p><i>If a slight increase in taxes causes these shirkers to quit working their offshoring, wage cutting, benefit eliminating, pension raiding, downsizing business model... </i></p>
<p>If we were talking about a "slight increase" you would have a point..</p>
<p>But, we're not, so you don't...</p>
<p><i>I think we will adjust quite easily.</i></p>
<p>"WE"???</p>
<p>You are pretty free and easy with other people's money..</p>
<p>Why don't YOU personally subsidize other people who don't want to work...</p>
<p>You might be a little less free and easy with that "WE", eh??  :D</p>
<p><i> but unfortunately, I'd bet there will still be plenty of money in it to incentivize them.</i></p>
<p>And when the Leftist morons want to take MORE and MORE???  And you know they will...  </p>
<p>How much is enough???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64402</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64402</guid>
		<description>Micha

&quot;Yea, but when one only accepts the facts that supports one&#039;s partisan agenda and ignores the facts that don&#039;t??&quot;

Actually, it was an agenda unsupported by the facts that criminalized pot in the first place, so I don&#039;t think anybody will give you a hard time about coming around. 

As for the tax loophole, the rich will stay rich, and a &quot;fair share&quot; would be roughly what everyone else pays... see definition of &quot;fair&quot;.

If a slight increase in taxes causes these shirkers to quit working their offshoring, wage cutting, benefit eliminating, pension raiding, downsizing business model... I think we will adjust quite easily... but unfortunately, I&#039;d bet there will still be plenty of money in it to incentivize them.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micha</p>
<p>"Yea, but when one only accepts the facts that supports one's partisan agenda and ignores the facts that don't??"</p>
<p>Actually, it was an agenda unsupported by the facts that criminalized pot in the first place, so I don't think anybody will give you a hard time about coming around. </p>
<p>As for the tax loophole, the rich will stay rich, and a "fair share" would be roughly what everyone else pays... see definition of "fair".</p>
<p>If a slight increase in taxes causes these shirkers to quit working their offshoring, wage cutting, benefit eliminating, pension raiding, downsizing business model... I think we will adjust quite easily... but unfortunately, I'd bet there will still be plenty of money in it to incentivize them.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64400</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64400</guid>
		<description>One more thing.  Trump recently announced he was willing to spend 1 billion dollars on his campaign. Forbes looked the numbers over and announced it was more like 444 million. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing.  Trump recently announced he was willing to spend 1 billion dollars on his campaign. Forbes looked the numbers over and announced it was more like 444 million. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64399</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64399</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m feeling more secure about the &quot;Trump has hit his high water mark&quot; limb I decided to walk onto after the last debate. 

Item: Trump odds of winning the nomination have declined in the prediction markets

Item:His share of media attention is way down, and actually started to tank in early August. 

Ben Schreckinger noted both the above 4 days ago over at Politico.

Today: Real Clear Politics published a CNN/ORC poll showing Trump at 24%, and even their (lagging indicator) rolling average shows him trending down.

Of all the above, I think flagging media ratings are the most important, because Trump is basically an entertainer performing on a political stage. Trump is becoming stale.  The media outlets that made him may be turning on him - the old &quot;we built you up, and we will tear you down&quot; story.  Any story will do if boosts revenue. Trump can&#039;t repeat the old stuff, he is going to have to up the stakes to win back attention and his crowds.  That is traditionally when the entertainment franchise enters into shark infested waters and attempts a jump.  Wait for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm feeling more secure about the "Trump has hit his high water mark" limb I decided to walk onto after the last debate. </p>
<p>Item: Trump odds of winning the nomination have declined in the prediction markets</p>
<p>Item:His share of media attention is way down, and actually started to tank in early August. </p>
<p>Ben Schreckinger noted both the above 4 days ago over at Politico.</p>
<p>Today: Real Clear Politics published a CNN/ORC poll showing Trump at 24%, and even their (lagging indicator) rolling average shows him trending down.</p>
<p>Of all the above, I think flagging media ratings are the most important, because Trump is basically an entertainer performing on a political stage. Trump is becoming stale.  The media outlets that made him may be turning on him - the old "we built you up, and we will tear you down" story.  Any story will do if boosts revenue. Trump can't repeat the old stuff, he is going to have to up the stakes to win back attention and his crowds.  That is traditionally when the entertainment franchise enters into shark infested waters and attempts a jump.  Wait for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64398</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64398</guid>
		<description>Michale wrote:

&quot;1. The rich become NOT rich and are added to the welfare rolls..

2. The rich get tired of working their asses off for the lazy so they take their money to another country and give a big and mighty FRAK YOU to America...&quot;

1.) Contrary to popular belief, you will NEVER run out of rich people. Too many people will aspire to be rich no matter what. There are also more millionaires now around the world than at any time before in history. Even in a communist country, there are still rich people. Look at the cadre around the &quot;dear leader&quot; in North Korea. Millionaires by any standard, every single one of them. 

2.) Which is precisely why you go after offshore banking accounts in places like the Cayman Islands and Switzerland. It is also why you tax capital gains as well as income. Also, not even the rich can avoid paying things like sales taxes, no matter where they take their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale wrote:</p>
<p>"1. The rich become NOT rich and are added to the welfare rolls..</p>
<p>2. The rich get tired of working their asses off for the lazy so they take their money to another country and give a big and mighty FRAK YOU to America..."</p>
<p>1.) Contrary to popular belief, you will NEVER run out of rich people. Too many people will aspire to be rich no matter what. There are also more millionaires now around the world than at any time before in history. Even in a communist country, there are still rich people. Look at the cadre around the "dear leader" in North Korea. Millionaires by any standard, every single one of them. </p>
<p>2.) Which is precisely why you go after offshore banking accounts in places like the Cayman Islands and Switzerland. It is also why you tax capital gains as well as income. Also, not even the rich can avoid paying things like sales taxes, no matter where they take their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64397</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64397</guid>
		<description>BigA,

&lt;I&gt;Glad your foot&#039;s ok.&lt;/I&gt;

Tanks......   And planes!!!!   :D

heh... that never gets old!!   :D

&lt;I&gt;You know what works well for pain too right.&lt;/I&gt;

Beer, right!!???  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;BEER!! The cause AND solution to all of life&#039;s problems!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Homer Simpson

&lt;I&gt;And, I wouldn&#039;t worry too much about that hypocrisy thing. Acceptance of the facts doesn&#039;t really fall into that category.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, but when one only accepts the facts that supports one&#039;s partisan agenda and ignores the facts that don&#039;t??

It&#039;s still hypocrisy...

&lt;I&gt;As for the hedge fund loophole and your &quot;of course, everyone here will give the GOP credit for their good idea, right???&quot; claim, if letting the GOP take the credit for our idea&lt;/I&gt;

I would think that would be a DOUBLE incentive for they Hysterical Left to acknowledge the idea...  :D

&lt;I&gt; is what it takes to get the shirkers to pay their fair share,&lt;/I&gt;

Who decides what&#039;s &quot;fair&quot;??  

What&#039;s the litmus test???  Ideological purity???

Oh wait.. I know...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;All those who believe as I do should get more...  Al those who DON&#039;T believe as I do should GIVE more..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

The problem with sticking it to the rich is that it usually results in one of two things.

1. The rich become NOT rich and are added to the welfare rolls..

2.  The rich get tired of working their asses off for the lazy so they take their money to another country and give a big and mighty FRAK YOU to America...

Either way, the well runs dry...

Then what???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigA,</p>
<p><i>Glad your foot's ok.</i></p>
<p>Tanks......   And planes!!!!   :D</p>
<p>heh... that never gets old!!   :D</p>
<p><i>You know what works well for pain too right.</i></p>
<p>Beer, right!!???  :D</p>
<p><b>"BEER!! The cause AND solution to all of life's problems!!"</b><br />
-Homer Simpson</p>
<p><i>And, I wouldn't worry too much about that hypocrisy thing. Acceptance of the facts doesn't really fall into that category.</i></p>
<p>Yea, but when one only accepts the facts that supports one's partisan agenda and ignores the facts that don't??</p>
<p>It's still hypocrisy...</p>
<p><i>As for the hedge fund loophole and your "of course, everyone here will give the GOP credit for their good idea, right???" claim, if letting the GOP take the credit for our idea</i></p>
<p>I would think that would be a DOUBLE incentive for they Hysterical Left to acknowledge the idea...  :D</p>
<p><i> is what it takes to get the shirkers to pay their fair share,</i></p>
<p>Who decides what's "fair"??  </p>
<p>What's the litmus test???  Ideological purity???</p>
<p>Oh wait.. I know...</p>
<p><b>"All those who believe as I do should get more...  Al those who DON'T believe as I do should GIVE more.."</b></p>
<p>The problem with sticking it to the rich is that it usually results in one of two things.</p>
<p>1. The rich become NOT rich and are added to the welfare rolls..</p>
<p>2.  The rich get tired of working their asses off for the lazy so they take their money to another country and give a big and mighty FRAK YOU to America...</p>
<p>Either way, the well runs dry...</p>
<p>Then what???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64396</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64396</guid>
		<description>Micha

Glad your foot&#039;s ok.
Gotta check those shoes.
You know what works well for pain too right.

And, I wouldn&#039;t worry too much about that hypocrisy thing. Acceptance of the facts doesn&#039;t really fall into that category.

As for the hedge fund loophole and your &quot;of course, everyone here will give the GOP credit for their good idea, right???&quot; claim, if letting the GOP take the credit for our idea is what it takes to get the shirkers to pay their fair share, you hereby have my promise to falsely praise their wisdom when the loophole is closed.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micha</p>
<p>Glad your foot's ok.<br />
Gotta check those shoes.<br />
You know what works well for pain too right.</p>
<p>And, I wouldn't worry too much about that hypocrisy thing. Acceptance of the facts doesn't really fall into that category.</p>
<p>As for the hedge fund loophole and your "of course, everyone here will give the GOP credit for their good idea, right???" claim, if letting the GOP take the credit for our idea is what it takes to get the shirkers to pay their fair share, you hereby have my promise to falsely praise their wisdom when the loophole is closed.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altohone</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64395</link>
		<dc:creator>altohone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64395</guid>
		<description>Hey CW

The Clinton machine seems to be repeating the same mistakes they made eight years ago... and getting comparable results.
Attacking Bernie instead of selling herself is a repeat of what didn&#039;t work against Obama. The fact that they&#039;re not attacks on his policies just makes it all the more familiar... just like the initial strategy to just ignore him.

Since name recognition is still a problem for the Bern, I guess you could argue that the attacks from the PAC and the WSJ may actually be beneficial. They helped put his name in the media, and you may be far from the only one pointing out he is an actual threat and viable alternative.


I&#039;m not sure your honorable mention for Hill &quot;attempting to steer her campaign in a new and better direction&quot; makes sense given that Bernie&#039;s rise isn&#039;t due to her weak campaign skills. It is Hillary&#039;s Wall Street coddling policies and neoliberal foreign policy that people are sick of, and at best she is only sugarcoating them. Her attempts to appear more personable and less right wing just come across as inauthentic pandering. 


Given that Jindal was my prediction for next to quit the clown car, I hope there hasn&#039;t been some lucrative job offer dangled in exchange for his attack dog role. Though highly entertaining, I would have to call shenanigans on this outside interference in our contest.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey CW</p>
<p>The Clinton machine seems to be repeating the same mistakes they made eight years ago... and getting comparable results.<br />
Attacking Bernie instead of selling herself is a repeat of what didn't work against Obama. The fact that they're not attacks on his policies just makes it all the more familiar... just like the initial strategy to just ignore him.</p>
<p>Since name recognition is still a problem for the Bern, I guess you could argue that the attacks from the PAC and the WSJ may actually be beneficial. They helped put his name in the media, and you may be far from the only one pointing out he is an actual threat and viable alternative.</p>
<p>I'm not sure your honorable mention for Hill "attempting to steer her campaign in a new and better direction" makes sense given that Bernie's rise isn't due to her weak campaign skills. It is Hillary's Wall Street coddling policies and neoliberal foreign policy that people are sick of, and at best she is only sugarcoating them. Her attempts to appear more personable and less right wing just come across as inauthentic pandering. </p>
<p>Given that Jindal was my prediction for next to quit the clown car, I hope there hasn't been some lucrative job offer dangled in exchange for his attack dog role. Though highly entertaining, I would have to call shenanigans on this outside interference in our contest.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64392</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64392</guid>
		<description>Oh wait...

&lt;B&gt;Friday Talking Points [362] -- Beyond The Debate **STAGE**&lt;/B&gt;

I get it now...   :D

heh

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wait...</p>
<p><b>Friday Talking Points [362] -- Beyond The Debate **STAGE**</b></p>
<p>I get it now...   :D</p>
<p>heh</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64391</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64391</guid>
		<description>http://www.wsj.com/articles/joe-biden-edges-closer-to-joining-presidential-race-1442617215

Looks like, with Biden, it&#039;s not a matter of IF, but rather  WHEN...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/joe-biden-edges-closer-to-joining-presidential-race-1442617215" rel="nofollow">http://www.wsj.com/articles/joe-biden-edges-closer-to-joining-presidential-race-1442617215</a></p>
<p>Looks like, with Biden, it's not a matter of IF, but rather  WHEN...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64390</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64390</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Get him a Gopro for Christmas, if he doesn&#039;t have one (it&#039;s really for you and your wife, but you don&#039;t have to tell him that).&lt;/I&gt;

That is a completely, totally awesome idea!!!!

Thanx TS!

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Get him a Gopro for Christmas, if he doesn't have one (it's really for you and your wife, but you don't have to tell him that).</i></p>
<p>That is a completely, totally awesome idea!!!!</p>
<p>Thanx TS!</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64389</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 17:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64389</guid>
		<description>M-17

&quot;Shirley, you jest!&quot;

Figured as much, but I look at it as funded adventure travel for those not yet ready for car or mortgage payments.  He&#039;ll bank some good memories, get some good connections if he is lucky.  Get him a Gopro for Christmas, if he doesn&#039;t have one (it&#039;s really for you and your wife, but you don&#039;t have to tell him that).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-17</p>
<p>"Shirley, you jest!"</p>
<p>Figured as much, but I look at it as funded adventure travel for those not yet ready for car or mortgage payments.  He'll bank some good memories, get some good connections if he is lucky.  Get him a Gopro for Christmas, if he doesn't have one (it's really for you and your wife, but you don't have to tell him that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64388</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64388</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;That ol&#039; parent/child marijuana discussion tends to shift the parental attitude from away from theoretical and more towards the practical.&lt;/I&gt;

Tenuously connected...

I remember a George C Scott movie that dealt with the abortion issue...  Scott was totally against his daughter (played by Melissa Gilbert, if I recall correctly) getting an abortion, but was encouraging his mistress to get one...

I mention it because the hypocrisy angle is the same..

Which is why I am finding it hard to commit to a Pro marijuana position..  

The idea that it is medicine-ized marijuana is small comfort...   

The fact that it is my little bugga-boo is the totality of the deciding factor..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That ol' parent/child marijuana discussion tends to shift the parental attitude from away from theoretical and more towards the practical.</i></p>
<p>Tenuously connected...</p>
<p>I remember a George C Scott movie that dealt with the abortion issue...  Scott was totally against his daughter (played by Melissa Gilbert, if I recall correctly) getting an abortion, but was encouraging his mistress to get one...</p>
<p>I mention it because the hypocrisy angle is the same..</p>
<p>Which is why I am finding it hard to commit to a Pro marijuana position..  </p>
<p>The idea that it is medicine-ized marijuana is small comfort...   </p>
<p>The fact that it is my little bugga-boo is the totality of the deciding factor..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64387</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64387</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;That was 25% more than I needed to know....uuuuuhhhhh!&lt;/I&gt;

Bad mental picture??  :D

&lt;I&gt;That ol&#039; parent/child marijuana discussion tends to shift the parental attitude from away from theoretical and more towards the practical.&lt;/I&gt;

Amen to that!!  :D

&lt;I&gt;Did your son actually bank any significant money from his Alaska fishing?&lt;/I&gt;

He makes good money..  Usually around 20K-30K per 3-4 month outing..    

Now, does he BANK it??  

Shirley, you jest!  :D  heh

To be fair, the company takes a big chunk for all the things they do (lodging, food, transpo, etc etc)  

But he keeps going back so I guess it works for him...  

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That was 25% more than I needed to know....uuuuuhhhhh!</i></p>
<p>Bad mental picture??  :D</p>
<p><i>That ol' parent/child marijuana discussion tends to shift the parental attitude from away from theoretical and more towards the practical.</i></p>
<p>Amen to that!!  :D</p>
<p><i>Did your son actually bank any significant money from his Alaska fishing?</i></p>
<p>He makes good money..  Usually around 20K-30K per 3-4 month outing..    </p>
<p>Now, does he BANK it??  </p>
<p>Shirley, you jest!  :D  heh</p>
<p>To be fair, the company takes a big chunk for all the things they do (lodging, food, transpo, etc etc)  </p>
<p>But he keeps going back so I guess it works for him...  </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64386</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64386</guid>
		<description>Full transcript

That was an eye opener on two levels.  

Text vs video:

1) Text is much faster to mentally upload and process, even when it&#039;s not paginated.  Why no pdfs?

Reading the text emphasized that CNN structured this as a gotcha debate, which is good for ratings but trivializes the political discourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full transcript</p>
<p>That was an eye opener on two levels.  </p>
<p>Text vs video:</p>
<p>1) Text is much faster to mentally upload and process, even when it's not paginated.  Why no pdfs?</p>
<p>Reading the text emphasized that CNN structured this as a gotcha debate, which is good for ratings but trivializes the political discourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64385</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64385</guid>
		<description>M-14

That was 25% more than I needed to know....uuuuuhhhhh!

That ol&#039; parent/child marijuana discussion tends to shift the parental attitude from away from theoretical and more towards the practical.

Did your son actually bank any significant money from his Alaska fishing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-14</p>
<p>That was 25% more than I needed to know....uuuuuhhhhh!</p>
<p>That ol' parent/child marijuana discussion tends to shift the parental attitude from away from theoretical and more towards the practical.</p>
<p>Did your son actually bank any significant money from his Alaska fishing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64384</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64384</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Glad you are back! You might want to cut back on the work hrs a bit....10-12 hr per day, six days a week is plenty.&lt;/I&gt;

Thanx, TS...

Actually, I do take Mondays off.. 

Sit around the house nekkid all day eating bon bons and watching Battlestar Galactica...  :D

Family joke...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Glad you are back! You might want to cut back on the work hrs a bit....10-12 hr per day, six days a week is plenty.</i></p>
<p>Thanx, TS...</p>
<p>Actually, I do take Mondays off.. </p>
<p>Sit around the house nekkid all day eating bon bons and watching Battlestar Galactica...  :D</p>
<p>Family joke...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64383</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64383</guid>
		<description>M-

The NSA noticed
You woint in the pictcha.
Here&#039;s hopin&#039; you squished
Whatever which bit ya.

Fire ant bite?  

Quick onset of excruciating  pain?   That would be consistent with a widow spider bite.  

Glad you are back!   You might want to cut back on the work hrs a bit....10-12 hr per day, six days a week is plenty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-</p>
<p>The NSA noticed<br />
You woint in the pictcha.<br />
Here's hopin' you squished<br />
Whatever which bit ya.</p>
<p>Fire ant bite?  </p>
<p>Quick onset of excruciating  pain?   That would be consistent with a widow spider bite.  </p>
<p>Glad you are back!   You might want to cut back on the work hrs a bit....10-12 hr per day, six days a week is plenty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64382</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64382</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Hillary Clinton bails on hanging out with eager kids from Laconia Boys &amp; Girls Club&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nh1.com/news/hillary-clinton-bails-on-hanging-out-with-eager-kids-from-laconia-boys-and-girls-club/

Maybe Hillary had to leave the area because she was afraid a house would fall on her...  :^/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Hillary Clinton bails on hanging out with eager kids from Laconia Boys &amp; Girls Club</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nh1.com/news/hillary-clinton-bails-on-hanging-out-with-eager-kids-from-laconia-boys-and-girls-club/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nh1.com/news/hillary-clinton-bails-on-hanging-out-with-eager-kids-from-laconia-boys-and-girls-club/</a></p>
<p>Maybe Hillary had to leave the area because she was afraid a house would fall on her...  :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64381</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64381</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Michale and welcome back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Michale and welcome back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64380</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64380</guid>
		<description>Advice to live by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advice to live by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64379</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64379</guid>
		<description>Free your mind and your ass will follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free your mind and your ass will follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64378</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64378</guid>
		<description>Liz,

Awwwww Yer da sweetest... :D

Yea, it&#039;s weird.. I don&#039;t FEEL bad at all..  I mean, junk food, copious amounts of beer and 16-20 hour days takes it&#039;s toll.. I get that..

But I really don&#039;t feel it, health readings notwithstanding...

Naw, I don&#039;t intend to go quietly into that good night..

When I die, it&#039;s going to be with blood in my mouth, a bullet in my chest and a gun in my hand....  :D

&lt;I&gt;Glad to hear it wasn&#039;t anything serious. :)&lt;/I&gt;

Thanx, Liz...  Yer a peach.. :D

And I do believe that a Happy Birthday wish is the order of the day..  

Hope you have a wonderful day..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p>Awwwww Yer da sweetest... :D</p>
<p>Yea, it's weird.. I don't FEEL bad at all..  I mean, junk food, copious amounts of beer and 16-20 hour days takes it's toll.. I get that..</p>
<p>But I really don't feel it, health readings notwithstanding...</p>
<p>Naw, I don't intend to go quietly into that good night..</p>
<p>When I die, it's going to be with blood in my mouth, a bullet in my chest and a gun in my hand....  :D</p>
<p><i>Glad to hear it wasn't anything serious. :)</i></p>
<p>Thanx, Liz...  Yer a peach.. :D</p>
<p>And I do believe that a Happy Birthday wish is the order of the day..  </p>
<p>Hope you have a wonderful day..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64376</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64376</guid>
		<description>Michale,

Please see the following:

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/14/debate-prep/#comment-64272

Glad to hear it wasn&#039;t anything serious. :)

But, someone may be trying desperately to tell you something. So, take it easy ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>Please see the following:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/14/debate-prep/#comment-64272" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/14/debate-prep/#comment-64272</a></p>
<p>Glad to hear it wasn't anything serious. :)</p>
<p>But, someone may be trying desperately to tell you something. So, take it easy ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64375</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64375</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;Pope Francis will be coming to America soon, and it seems that some Republicans are running away from the Pope in fear of what he&#039;ll say. It seems they want to use religious leaders&#039; statements when politically convenient, but then ignore statements that they don&#039;t want to hear. Sounds like a pretty thin grasp of Christianity, to me. Unlike many of these religiously-choosy Republicans, the Pope has actually read all the Bible -- even those parts about being a good shepherd of the Earth and helping the poor whenever possible. There are in fact many things in the Bible that many politicians just conveniently omit, and the Pope&#039;s about to remind them of a few. Should be interesting!&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

The Left hysterically fawning over the pope is so blatantly hypocritical, it&#039;s not even funny...

The Left has denigrated and attack the pope with gleeful abandon in the past..

But NOW that this moronic pope is in power, spouting all the Left Wing BS that the Left loves to hear, NOW the pope is the Left&#039;s BFF...

The Left isn&#039;t even making an effort to hide the blatant and nauseating hypocrisy..

As far as the pope&#039;s &quot;science&quot; goes???

&lt;B&gt;Quick Note to the Pope
By Joe Bastardi · Sep. 18, 2015&lt;/B&gt;
http://patriotpost.us/opinion/37721

Of course, not to be outdone in the HYPOCRISY department..

The White House announced that the President will rise above politics during the pope&#039;s White House visit...

THEN turns around and announces that some loony transvestite (I know, I know.. Redundant...), a gay bishop and a Left Wing activist nun would be amongst those to greet and meet the poop...

Whew!!!  

For a moment I thought Obama was going to use the pope&#039;s visit to push an unpopular freedom crushing partisan agenda....

Glad we dodged THAT bullet, eh??  :^/

{{/sarcasm}}

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"Pope Francis will be coming to America soon, and it seems that some Republicans are running away from the Pope in fear of what he'll say. It seems they want to use religious leaders' statements when politically convenient, but then ignore statements that they don't want to hear. Sounds like a pretty thin grasp of Christianity, to me. Unlike many of these religiously-choosy Republicans, the Pope has actually read all the Bible -- even those parts about being a good shepherd of the Earth and helping the poor whenever possible. There are in fact many things in the Bible that many politicians just conveniently omit, and the Pope's about to remind them of a few. Should be interesting!"</i></p>
<p>The Left hysterically fawning over the pope is so blatantly hypocritical, it's not even funny...</p>
<p>The Left has denigrated and attack the pope with gleeful abandon in the past..</p>
<p>But NOW that this moronic pope is in power, spouting all the Left Wing BS that the Left loves to hear, NOW the pope is the Left's BFF...</p>
<p>The Left isn't even making an effort to hide the blatant and nauseating hypocrisy..</p>
<p>As far as the pope's "science" goes???</p>
<p><b>Quick Note to the Pope<br />
By Joe Bastardi · Sep. 18, 2015</b><br />
<a href="http://patriotpost.us/opinion/37721" rel="nofollow">http://patriotpost.us/opinion/37721</a></p>
<p>Of course, not to be outdone in the HYPOCRISY department..</p>
<p>The White House announced that the President will rise above politics during the pope's White House visit...</p>
<p>THEN turns around and announces that some loony transvestite (I know, I know.. Redundant...), a gay bishop and a Left Wing activist nun would be amongst those to greet and meet the poop...</p>
<p>Whew!!!  </p>
<p>For a moment I thought Obama was going to use the pope's visit to push an unpopular freedom crushing partisan agenda....</p>
<p>Glad we dodged THAT bullet, eh??  :^/</p>
<p>{{/sarcasm}}</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64373</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 08:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64373</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;  More good Obamacare data is in&lt;/I&gt;

And YET....

And yet, the MAJORITY of Americans STILL don&#039;t like it.. STILL don&#039;t want it..

All the cherry picked stats will not change this one simple fact..

Americans don&#039;t LIKE it..  

Americans don&#039;t WANT it...

&lt;I&gt; Republicans coming to their senses on weed&lt;/I&gt;

I have to admit I am at a crossroads on this issue..

My son was home from Alaska and we were talking and he told me he had smoked pot while on a layover in Seattle...  Resisting the urge to bitch-slap him (BARELY) I told him to get out and he was no longer welcome in my house!!!  

Just kidding.  :D  

But seriously, I was taken aback and pretty shocked..  Not that he had done it (my son is no saint) but that it was so nonchalantly mentioned...

One of the OTHER roads to travel is the fact that my oldest grandson (9) has epilepsy and that there are some marijuana based medications that can really help him..

So, there are many logical and rational reasons to come down off my high horse about marijuana...

But I have a hard time getting past the whole, &lt;B&gt;There is no such thing as a &quot;former&quot; cop..&lt;/B&gt; thing...

But my attitude IS changing, I cannot deny that...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>  More good Obamacare data is in</i></p>
<p>And YET....</p>
<p>And yet, the MAJORITY of Americans STILL don't like it.. STILL don't want it..</p>
<p>All the cherry picked stats will not change this one simple fact..</p>
<p>Americans don't LIKE it..  </p>
<p>Americans don't WANT it...</p>
<p><i> Republicans coming to their senses on weed</i></p>
<p>I have to admit I am at a crossroads on this issue..</p>
<p>My son was home from Alaska and we were talking and he told me he had smoked pot while on a layover in Seattle...  Resisting the urge to bitch-slap him (BARELY) I told him to get out and he was no longer welcome in my house!!!  </p>
<p>Just kidding.  :D  </p>
<p>But seriously, I was taken aback and pretty shocked..  Not that he had done it (my son is no saint) but that it was so nonchalantly mentioned...</p>
<p>One of the OTHER roads to travel is the fact that my oldest grandson (9) has epilepsy and that there are some marijuana based medications that can really help him..</p>
<p>So, there are many logical and rational reasons to come down off my high horse about marijuana...</p>
<p>But I have a hard time getting past the whole, <b>There is no such thing as a "former" cop..</b> thing...</p>
<p>But my attitude IS changing, I cannot deny that...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64371</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64371</guid>
		<description>Rumors of my demise have been exaggerated... 

But not by much..  :D

OK, so I had to go to the hospital last weekend.  I don&#039;t know if it was some sort of bite or something, but my foot swelled up like a balloon...  

Of course, once I get there, the first thing they do is take my blood pressure...

214 over 140...

Apparently, this is some kind of big deal, as my lovely wife.... freaked.... out...  The nurses got real quiet and real urgent and the next thing I know I am spending several days in ICU and being told to think happy, calming, koom-bye-ya thoughts..  

What am I, a liberal??  :D

So anyways, I got sprung and here I am!   :D

Did ya&#039;all miss me??  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Did ya miss me???&quot;
&quot;With every shot so far..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-MARRIED WITH CHILDREN

:D

So, let&#039;s get to it, shall we??   

&lt;I&gt; (known to Republicans as &quot;The Shrine of Saint Ronald of Reagan&#039;s Magic Airplane&quot;).&lt;/I&gt;

You mean, as opposed to the Obama-cropolis???

Ya&#039;all can&#039;t ridicule the GOP for their symbolism w/o acknowledging how whacked the Democrat Party is in that area...

Well, ya&#039;all CAN, of course..  But not without a snarky comment from me..  :D

&lt;I&gt;Something sneaking up on everyone in the political world is the surprising amount of GOP candidates who are open to ending a massive tax break for hedge fund managers. President Obama has noticed, and is pointing it out. This won&#039;t happen overnight, but it cuts to the core of Republican orthodoxy (&quot;no tax hikes ever on anyone for any reason&quot;), so it certainly is an interesting political shift to watch.&lt;/I&gt;

And, of course, everyone here will give the GOP credit for their good idea, right???

Sheeya right.. When Monkees fly outta my butt!!   :D

Which puts to rest the utter BS about, &lt;B&gt;&quot;Oh, we&#039;ll support the GOP if they ever have a good idea!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

:D

Jindal is such a hypocrite....  He talks about civility in the campaign then he pulls this kind of carp....

He is ALMOST as bad as Hillary in the hypocrisy department...

Jindal should follow Carson&#039;s example..


&lt;I&gt;In a speech at Georgetown University in February, Comey said he makes new agents and analysts study the F.B.I.&#039;s relationship with [Martin Luther] King and visit his memorial so they can ponder the mistakes of the past. Comey also said that he keeps a letter on his desk from then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy approving Hoover&#039;s baseless request to wiretap King&#039;s telephone calls.&lt;/I&gt;

Whatta PC suck-up....  :^/

&lt;I&gt;For attempting to steer her campaign in a new and better direction, Clinton gets some credit.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea.. She deserves credit for finally realizing how much trouble her campaign is in and that the STAY THE COURSE strategy was a fool&#039;s errand...

But, many Democrats are saying &lt;B&gt;&quot;Too little, too late..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

It&#039;s all for naught..  Once the next batch of Hillary emails are released (drip, drip, drip) and Hillary starts getting peppered with questions, she&#039;ll run and hide again..

That&#039;s a prediction you can take to the bank.. 

Preferably mine..  $20s and $50s welcome... :D

&lt;I&gt;We&#039;re not going to give the Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week award to Hillary Clinton, tempting though it may be. Instead, we&#039;re awarding it to the &quot;Correct The Record&quot; super PAC, which is supporting Clinton&#039;s campaign. This hair-splitting is necessary to preserve the fiction that PACs never &quot;coordinate&quot; with the campaigns, meaning the entire mess can&#039;t directly be laid at Hillary&#039;s door.&lt;/I&gt;

Com&#039;on!!  This is a REALITY based forum... :D  And the REALITY is that Hillary and her Super PAC are arm in arm, two peas in a pod...  

No amount of fiction will change that fact...

Get to the TPs in a bit..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumors of my demise have been exaggerated... </p>
<p>But not by much..  :D</p>
<p>OK, so I had to go to the hospital last weekend.  I don't know if it was some sort of bite or something, but my foot swelled up like a balloon...  </p>
<p>Of course, once I get there, the first thing they do is take my blood pressure...</p>
<p>214 over 140...</p>
<p>Apparently, this is some kind of big deal, as my lovely wife.... freaked.... out...  The nurses got real quiet and real urgent and the next thing I know I am spending several days in ICU and being told to think happy, calming, koom-bye-ya thoughts..  </p>
<p>What am I, a liberal??  :D</p>
<p>So anyways, I got sprung and here I am!   :D</p>
<p>Did ya'all miss me??  :D</p>
<p><b>"Did ya miss me???"<br />
"With every shot so far.."</b><br />
-MARRIED WITH CHILDREN</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>So, let's get to it, shall we??   </p>
<p><i> (known to Republicans as "The Shrine of Saint Ronald of Reagan's Magic Airplane").</i></p>
<p>You mean, as opposed to the Obama-cropolis???</p>
<p>Ya'all can't ridicule the GOP for their symbolism w/o acknowledging how whacked the Democrat Party is in that area...</p>
<p>Well, ya'all CAN, of course..  But not without a snarky comment from me..  :D</p>
<p><i>Something sneaking up on everyone in the political world is the surprising amount of GOP candidates who are open to ending a massive tax break for hedge fund managers. President Obama has noticed, and is pointing it out. This won't happen overnight, but it cuts to the core of Republican orthodoxy ("no tax hikes ever on anyone for any reason"), so it certainly is an interesting political shift to watch.</i></p>
<p>And, of course, everyone here will give the GOP credit for their good idea, right???</p>
<p>Sheeya right.. When Monkees fly outta my butt!!   :D</p>
<p>Which puts to rest the utter BS about, <b>"Oh, we'll support the GOP if they ever have a good idea!!"</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Jindal is such a hypocrite....  He talks about civility in the campaign then he pulls this kind of carp....</p>
<p>He is ALMOST as bad as Hillary in the hypocrisy department...</p>
<p>Jindal should follow Carson's example..</p>
<p><i>In a speech at Georgetown University in February, Comey said he makes new agents and analysts study the F.B.I.'s relationship with [Martin Luther] King and visit his memorial so they can ponder the mistakes of the past. Comey also said that he keeps a letter on his desk from then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy approving Hoover's baseless request to wiretap King's telephone calls.</i></p>
<p>Whatta PC suck-up....  :^/</p>
<p><i>For attempting to steer her campaign in a new and better direction, Clinton gets some credit.</i></p>
<p>Yea.. She deserves credit for finally realizing how much trouble her campaign is in and that the STAY THE COURSE strategy was a fool's errand...</p>
<p>But, many Democrats are saying <b>"Too little, too late.."</b></p>
<p>It's all for naught..  Once the next batch of Hillary emails are released (drip, drip, drip) and Hillary starts getting peppered with questions, she'll run and hide again..</p>
<p>That's a prediction you can take to the bank.. </p>
<p>Preferably mine..  $20s and $50s welcome... :D</p>
<p><i>We're not going to give the Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week award to Hillary Clinton, tempting though it may be. Instead, we're awarding it to the "Correct The Record" super PAC, which is supporting Clinton's campaign. This hair-splitting is necessary to preserve the fiction that PACs never "coordinate" with the campaigns, meaning the entire mess can't directly be laid at Hillary's door.</i></p>
<p>Com'on!!  This is a REALITY based forum... :D  And the REALITY is that Hillary and her Super PAC are arm in arm, two peas in a pod...  </p>
<p>No amount of fiction will change that fact...</p>
<p>Get to the TPs in a bit..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64359</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 03:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64359</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;8&lt;/b&gt;  Ethnic cleansing is off the table!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>8</b>  Ethnic cleansing is off the table!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64358</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 03:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64358</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are in fact many things in the Bible that many politicians just conveniently omit, and the Pope&#039;s about to remind them of a few.&quot;

He&#039;s a cherry-picker just like every other faither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"There are in fact many things in the Bible that many politicians just conveniently omit, and the Pope's about to remind them of a few."</p>
<p>He's a cherry-picker just like every other faither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/18/ftp362/#comment-64357</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 03:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11226#comment-64357</guid>
		<description>&quot;the farce that was the &quot;P.M.R.C.&quot;

I still have a T-shirt with the &quot;parental advisory explicit lyrics&quot; label on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"the farce that was the "P.M.R.C."</p>
<p>I still have a T-shirt with the "parental advisory explicit lyrics" label on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
