<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Last Gay Rights Legislative Battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 17:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61904</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61904</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I don&#039;t think the issue can be refined any better than this.&lt;/I&gt;

Then you obviously haven&#039;t read everything..  :D

This law is nothing more than putting one groups rights before the rights of another group..

In and of itself, that&#039;s not that big of a deal.  It happens all the time..

What makes THIS such a big deal is that the group being persecuted is protected by the VERY FIRST part of the VERY FIRST Amendment of the US Constitution..

To put it into context that ya&#039;all would readily understand, it would be as if the courts forced Left Wingers to actively support,  defend, encourage AND facilitate the Citizens United ruling..

I bet if THAT were to happen, ya&#039;all would be screaming from the rooftops to the high heavens...

It&#039;s all nice and easy..  Until it&#039;s ya&#039;all who are on the receiving end of the persecution..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;It&#039;s all fun and games til someone gets shot in the leg!!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-AJ, ARMAGEDDON  

:D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don't think the issue can be refined any better than this.</i></p>
<p>Then you obviously haven't read everything..  :D</p>
<p>This law is nothing more than putting one groups rights before the rights of another group..</p>
<p>In and of itself, that's not that big of a deal.  It happens all the time..</p>
<p>What makes THIS such a big deal is that the group being persecuted is protected by the VERY FIRST part of the VERY FIRST Amendment of the US Constitution..</p>
<p>To put it into context that ya'all would readily understand, it would be as if the courts forced Left Wingers to actively support,  defend, encourage AND facilitate the Citizens United ruling..</p>
<p>I bet if THAT were to happen, ya'all would be screaming from the rooftops to the high heavens...</p>
<p>It's all nice and easy..  Until it's ya'all who are on the receiving end of the persecution..</p>
<p><b>"It's all fun and games til someone gets shot in the leg!!!!"</b><br />
-AJ, ARMAGEDDON  </p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61903</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61903</guid>
		<description>&quot;Opposing such a law is standing up for bigotry. There is no other way around it. In the fight for marriage equality, the opponents could claim they were fighting for the sanctity of the idea of marriage, but that isn&#039;t possible when you&#039;re essentially fighting for the right to fire gay workers for being gay. There is simply no other reason to oppose granting civil rights to gay people.&quot;

I don&#039;t think the issue can be refined any better than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Opposing such a law is standing up for bigotry. There is no other way around it. In the fight for marriage equality, the opponents could claim they were fighting for the sanctity of the idea of marriage, but that isn't possible when you're essentially fighting for the right to fire gay workers for being gay. There is simply no other reason to oppose granting civil rights to gay people."</p>
<p>I don't think the issue can be refined any better than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61900</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 07:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61900</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;Oh Puhleeeze... Your condemnation of christians who discriminate is not based on any morality or ethics.. It is solely and completely based on your political ideology. Your partisan agenda.... Booo Hoooo... Cry me a river..&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;&quot;He has been brought up on insubordination several times!&quot;
&quot;General, I&#039;ve read your own file.  Puuhleese....&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-STARGATE ATLANTIS

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"Oh Puhleeeze... Your condemnation of christians who discriminate is not based on any morality or ethics.. It is solely and completely based on your political ideology. Your partisan agenda.... Booo Hoooo... Cry me a river.."</i></p>
<p><b>"He has been brought up on insubordination several times!"<br />
"General, I've read your own file.  Puuhleese...."</b><br />
-STARGATE ATLANTIS</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61855</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61855</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all see, that is EXACTLY the problem with the Left&#039;s position on discrimination and bigotry..   

It&#039;s not based on MORALS or ETHICS...

It&#039;s based SOLELY and COMPLETELY on partisan ideology..  

Even here in Weigantia...  For months, I have been bringing up the gay hairdresser in New Mexico who refused to provide services to the GOP Governor..

His position??

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I have the right to refuse service to anyone I want!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;  

Sound familiar??

And this bigot was treated like a conquering hero by the Left...

Only ONE person here in Weigantia condemned the actions of this bigot..

&lt;B&gt;ONE&lt;/B&gt; person..

So to the Left I say, 

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Oh Puhleeeze...  Your condemnation of christians who discriminate is not based on any morality or ethics.. It is solely and completely based on your political ideology.  Your partisan agenda....  Booo Hoooo...  Cry me a river..&quot;  &lt;/B&gt;

You want to end discrimination against gay people??  

Fine and dandy....  Knock yerselves out..

But don&#039;t insult my intelligence and pretend that it&#039;s all based on a moral foundation...  

It isn&#039;t...  

It&#039;s nothing more than pushing a partisan agenda at the expense of those who don&#039;t think the same....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all see, that is EXACTLY the problem with the Left's position on discrimination and bigotry..   </p>
<p>It's not based on MORALS or ETHICS...</p>
<p>It's based SOLELY and COMPLETELY on partisan ideology..  </p>
<p>Even here in Weigantia...  For months, I have been bringing up the gay hairdresser in New Mexico who refused to provide services to the GOP Governor..</p>
<p>His position??</p>
<p><b>"I have the right to refuse service to anyone I want!!"</b>  </p>
<p>Sound familiar??</p>
<p>And this bigot was treated like a conquering hero by the Left...</p>
<p>Only ONE person here in Weigantia condemned the actions of this bigot..</p>
<p><b>ONE</b> person..</p>
<p>So to the Left I say, </p>
<p><b>"Oh Puhleeeze...  Your condemnation of christians who discriminate is not based on any morality or ethics.. It is solely and completely based on your political ideology.  Your partisan agenda....  Booo Hoooo...  Cry me a river.."  </b></p>
<p>You want to end discrimination against gay people??  </p>
<p>Fine and dandy....  Knock yerselves out..</p>
<p>But don't insult my intelligence and pretend that it's all based on a moral foundation...  </p>
<p>It isn't...  </p>
<p>It's nothing more than pushing a partisan agenda at the expense of those who don't think the same....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61850</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61850</guid>
		<description>Refusing service to someone just because they are a Republican is JUST as discriminatory, JUST as bigoted as refusing service to someone just because they are gay....

Am I wrong???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refusing service to someone just because they are a Republican is JUST as discriminatory, JUST as bigoted as refusing service to someone just because they are gay....</p>
<p>Am I wrong???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61849</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61849</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you find it a tad.... weird... that the Left wants to base a complete and separate RACIAL designation solely and completely on who a person decides to have sex with??

I find that weird to the point.... PAST the point of absurdity...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't you find it a tad.... weird... that the Left wants to base a complete and separate RACIAL designation solely and completely on who a person decides to have sex with??</p>
<p>I find that weird to the point.... PAST the point of absurdity...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61848</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61848</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;So, in other words, the Left has decided that in order to FIGHT the monster, they must BECOME the monster...

Well, aww right... :D&lt;/I&gt;

Or put another way..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;The ends justifies the means&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

I love it!!  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So, in other words, the Left has decided that in order to FIGHT the monster, they must BECOME the monster...</p>
<p>Well, aww right... :D</i></p>
<p>Or put another way..</p>
<p><b>"The ends justifies the means"</b></p>
<p>I love it!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61847</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61847</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;In that point, I agree with you, you are CORRECT for ONCE. &lt;/I&gt;

I was resoundingly ridiculed for suggesting that the Left thought of being gay as a race..

It&#039;s true..  He who laughs last DOES laugh best!!  :D

&lt;I&gt;Because being gay is NOT a choice. &lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s your opinion that does have some science to back it up..

Other people have the opposite opinion and they ALSO have science to back it up...

My personal view??

&quot;Being born that way&quot; is the gay person&#039;s version of a christian&#039;s &quot;The Devil made me do it&quot;..

Absolves them of any and all personal responsibility...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In that point, I agree with you, you are CORRECT for ONCE. </i></p>
<p>I was resoundingly ridiculed for suggesting that the Left thought of being gay as a race..</p>
<p>It's true..  He who laughs last DOES laugh best!!  :D</p>
<p><i>Because being gay is NOT a choice. </i></p>
<p>That's your opinion that does have some science to back it up..</p>
<p>Other people have the opposite opinion and they ALSO have science to back it up...</p>
<p>My personal view??</p>
<p>"Being born that way" is the gay person's version of a christian's "The Devil made me do it"..</p>
<p>Absolves them of any and all personal responsibility...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61846</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61846</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Actually Michale, you are WRONG. I DID. And I STILL DO. &lt;/I&gt;

Did you?  I thought we discussed it before hand but that you never actually took the Sherman..

If so, my bust...  :D

&lt;I&gt;NO&lt; IT WOULD NOT. Stopping Christians from being able to discriminate against NON-Christians is NOT discrimination AGAINST Christians. Pure and simple.&lt;/I&gt;

 Not allowing christians to follow the scriptures of their religion, to practice their religion as they see fit IS discrimination against christians.  

Pure and simple...


&lt;I&gt;Then why aren&#039;t Christians practicing what they preach? Why aren&#039;t Christians being tolerant and respectful Michale??? &lt;/I&gt;

Why are fanatical muslims beheading infidels and shooting up recruiting stations??

Because it&#039;s their religion....

&lt;I&gt;That WOULD have been the tolerant AND respectful thing to do, would it not???&lt;/I&gt;

So, what you are saying is it&#039;s ok to be discriminatory and intolerant of christians because they were discriminatory and intolerant first..

Hay, don&#039;t get me wrong.  That&#039;s a perfectly valid, if a tad childish, reason...

So, in other words, the Left has decided that in order to FIGHT the monster, they must BECOME the monster...

Well, aww right...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Actually Michale, you are WRONG. I DID. And I STILL DO. </i></p>
<p>Did you?  I thought we discussed it before hand but that you never actually took the Sherman..</p>
<p>If so, my bust...  :D</p>
<p><i>NO&lt; IT WOULD NOT. Stopping Christians from being able to discriminate against NON-Christians is NOT discrimination AGAINST Christians. Pure and simple.</i></p>
<p> Not allowing christians to follow the scriptures of their religion, to practice their religion as they see fit IS discrimination against christians.  </p>
<p>Pure and simple...</p>
<p><i>Then why aren't Christians practicing what they preach? Why aren't Christians being tolerant and respectful Michale??? </i></p>
<p>Why are fanatical muslims beheading infidels and shooting up recruiting stations??</p>
<p>Because it's their religion....</p>
<p><i>That WOULD have been the tolerant AND respectful thing to do, would it not???</i></p>
<p>So, what you are saying is it's ok to be discriminatory and intolerant of christians because they were discriminatory and intolerant first..</p>
<p>Hay, don't get me wrong.  That's a perfectly valid, if a tad childish, reason...</p>
<p>So, in other words, the Left has decided that in order to FIGHT the monster, they must BECOME the monster...</p>
<p>Well, aww right...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61845</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61845</guid>
		<description>Michale wrote:

&quot;In other words, it would make the gay lifestyle choice equivalent to a race..&quot;

In that point, I agree with you, you are CORRECT for ONCE. Because being gay is NOT a choice. Just like being heterosexual is NOT a choice. Being sexually active or not IS a choice, but that is NOT the same as ORIENTATION. I can be gay and BE a virgin. 

&quot;It would legalize discrimination against christians..&quot;

NO&lt; IT WOULD NOT. Stopping Christians from being able to discriminate against NON-Christians is NOT discrimination AGAINST Christians. Pure and simple. 

&quot;If you want tolerance, BE TOLERANT..

If you want respect, BE RESPECTFUL...&quot;

Then why aren&#039;t Christians practicing what they preach? Why aren&#039;t Christians being tolerant and respectful Michale??? If they were, they would NOT have opposed gay marriage in the first place! That WOULD have been the tolerant AND respectful thing to do, would it not???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale wrote:</p>
<p>"In other words, it would make the gay lifestyle choice equivalent to a race.."</p>
<p>In that point, I agree with you, you are CORRECT for ONCE. Because being gay is NOT a choice. Just like being heterosexual is NOT a choice. Being sexually active or not IS a choice, but that is NOT the same as ORIENTATION. I can be gay and BE a virgin. </p>
<p>"It would legalize discrimination against christians.."</p>
<p>NO&lt; IT WOULD NOT. Stopping Christians from being able to discriminate against NON-Christians is NOT discrimination AGAINST Christians. Pure and simple. </p>
<p>&quot;If you want tolerance, BE TOLERANT..</p>
<p>If you want respect, BE RESPECTFUL...&quot;</p>
<p>Then why aren&#039;t Christians practicing what they preach? Why aren&#039;t Christians being tolerant and respectful Michale??? If they were, they would NOT have opposed gay marriage in the first place! That WOULD have been the tolerant AND respectful thing to do, would it not???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61844</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61844</guid>
		<description>Michale wrote:

&quot;At the time, I asked if ANYONE was willing to take a Sherman in defense of religious freedom..

Nobody wanted to...&quot;

Actually Michale, you are WRONG. I DID. And I STILL DO. But being able to persecute someone else because of your religion when that other person does not share your religion, and no longer being able to do so, is NOT the same as being persecuted FOR YOUR OWN RELIGION. I don&#039;t understand why you keep failing to grasp that simple concept. 

Christians can still hold their beliefs, practice their beliefs, etc. They are not forced to perform a gay marriage ceremony in THEIR religion or House of Worship, NOR WILL THEY EVER BE. 

What they cannot do is IMPOSE their religion on someone else, force someone else to LIVE by THEIR religious rules. They can still discriminate in the PRIVATE sphere as much as they want. Not being able to DISCRIMINATE in the PUBLIC sphere, is NOT REVERSE DISCRIMINATION. 

Look at it this way. If I am a Moslem, and my religion says I must kill you because you are a Christian, and I am not allowed to do so, aren&#039;t you persecuting ME for MY religion by NOT allowing me to kill you? That is essentially what you are arguing regarding Christians and gays. Don&#039;t you see how ridiculous a position that is???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale wrote:</p>
<p>"At the time, I asked if ANYONE was willing to take a Sherman in defense of religious freedom..</p>
<p>Nobody wanted to..."</p>
<p>Actually Michale, you are WRONG. I DID. And I STILL DO. But being able to persecute someone else because of your religion when that other person does not share your religion, and no longer being able to do so, is NOT the same as being persecuted FOR YOUR OWN RELIGION. I don't understand why you keep failing to grasp that simple concept. </p>
<p>Christians can still hold their beliefs, practice their beliefs, etc. They are not forced to perform a gay marriage ceremony in THEIR religion or House of Worship, NOR WILL THEY EVER BE. </p>
<p>What they cannot do is IMPOSE their religion on someone else, force someone else to LIVE by THEIR religious rules. They can still discriminate in the PRIVATE sphere as much as they want. Not being able to DISCRIMINATE in the PUBLIC sphere, is NOT REVERSE DISCRIMINATION. </p>
<p>Look at it this way. If I am a Moslem, and my religion says I must kill you because you are a Christian, and I am not allowed to do so, aren't you persecuting ME for MY religion by NOT allowing me to kill you? That is essentially what you are arguing regarding Christians and gays. Don't you see how ridiculous a position that is???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61843</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61843</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Ehhhh I don&#039;t get it.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Pork Chop, TOY STORY

:D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Ehhhh I don't get it."</b><br />
-Pork Chop, TOY STORY</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61842</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61842</guid>
		<description>6 - Freedom from religious persecution....

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/06/1412553798686_wps_25_Title_LAUREL_AND_HARDY_Pe.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 - Freedom from religious persecution....</p>
<p><a href="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/06/1412553798686_wps_25_Title_LAUREL_AND_HARDY_Pe.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/06/1412553798686_wps_25_Title_LAUREL_AND_HARDY_Pe.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61839</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61839</guid>
		<description>The problem ya&#039;all have is that the right to be part of the gay lifestyle and NOT get dinged for it is NOT enshrined as the VERY first part of the VERY First Amendment of the US Constitution...

Freedom from religious persecution is...

It&#039;s that simple...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem ya'all have is that the right to be part of the gay lifestyle and NOT get dinged for it is NOT enshrined as the VERY first part of the VERY First Amendment of the US Constitution...</p>
<p>Freedom from religious persecution is...</p>
<p>It's that simple...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61838</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61838</guid>
		<description>As opposed to the Left Wing fanatics who shall legislate the ideological freedom to persecute...

That&#039;s the point ya&#039;all just never own up to..

It works both ways...

If you want tolerance, BE TOLERANT..

If you want respect, BE RESPECTFUL...

It&#039;s not rocket science..  It&#039;s common sense...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As opposed to the Left Wing fanatics who shall legislate the ideological freedom to persecute...</p>
<p>That's the point ya'all just never own up to..</p>
<p>It works both ways...</p>
<p>If you want tolerance, BE TOLERANT..</p>
<p>If you want respect, BE RESPECTFUL...</p>
<p>It's not rocket science..  It's common sense...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61837</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61837</guid>
		<description>&quot;Blessed are the Leviticus cherry-pickers for they shall inherit the religious freedom to persecute.&quot; - Mr Christ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Blessed are the Leviticus cherry-pickers for they shall inherit the religious freedom to persecute." - Mr Christ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61836</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61836</guid>
		<description>Remember the hairdresser in New Mexico who discriminated against a GOP governor and was treated as a conquering hero by the Hysterical (and not so Hysterical) Left??

Like I said..  The Left doesn&#039;t mind discrimination and bigotry..

As long as it&#039;s the RIGHT people being discriminated against.

Now the Left wants to codify that attitude into law...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the hairdresser in New Mexico who discriminated against a GOP governor and was treated as a conquering hero by the Hysterical (and not so Hysterical) Left??</p>
<p>Like I said..  The Left doesn't mind discrimination and bigotry..</p>
<p>As long as it's the RIGHT people being discriminated against.</p>
<p>Now the Left wants to codify that attitude into law...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61835</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61835</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; Gay people can (they begrudgingly now must admit) get married, but we want to make it possible for them to still be denied services and live a second-class life. That&#039;s really their position in a nutshell.&lt;/I&gt;

Actually it&#039;s not, by why quibble...  :D

&lt;I&gt;This legislation is pretty much the end of the road for gay rights and the law, because it would add LGBT people to the list of those groups covered by the 1964 Civil Rights Act&lt;/I&gt;

In other words, it would make the gay lifestyle choice equivalent to a race..  

ANOTHER thing that Weigantians strenuously argued AGAINST in recent history..

Two fer....

&lt;I&gt; This would give federal protection from discrimination to all Americans, which is the whole point. &lt;/I&gt;

EXCEPT for those who want religious freedom..

It would legalize discrimination against christians..

Basically what the Left is saying is that it should be illegal to discriminate, but ONLY against those who are politically/ideologically acceptable..

Those who are NOT politically/ideologically acceptable??

Discriminate away!!  The Left has no problem with that..   

Yea..  Nice attitude..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Gay people can (they begrudgingly now must admit) get married, but we want to make it possible for them to still be denied services and live a second-class life. That's really their position in a nutshell.</i></p>
<p>Actually it's not, by why quibble...  :D</p>
<p><i>This legislation is pretty much the end of the road for gay rights and the law, because it would add LGBT people to the list of those groups covered by the 1964 Civil Rights Act</i></p>
<p>In other words, it would make the gay lifestyle choice equivalent to a race..  </p>
<p>ANOTHER thing that Weigantians strenuously argued AGAINST in recent history..</p>
<p>Two fer....</p>
<p><i> This would give federal protection from discrimination to all Americans, which is the whole point. </i></p>
<p>EXCEPT for those who want religious freedom..</p>
<p>It would legalize discrimination against christians..</p>
<p>Basically what the Left is saying is that it should be illegal to discriminate, but ONLY against those who are politically/ideologically acceptable..</p>
<p>Those who are NOT politically/ideologically acceptable??</p>
<p>Discriminate away!!  The Left has no problem with that..   </p>
<p>Yea..  Nice attitude..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/07/23/the-last-gay-rights-legislative-battle/#comment-61834</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10986#comment-61834</guid>
		<description>Ahhhhh  And so it begins...

It was widely expressed here in Weigantia that the FIRST PART of the FIRST AMENDMENT is sacrosanct and that NO ONE &quot;would ever&quot; try to deprive a person of the right to freedom of religion..

At the time, I asked if ANYONE was willing to take a Sherman in defense of religious freedom..

Nobody wanted to...

Now we know why...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhhh  And so it begins...</p>
<p>It was widely expressed here in Weigantia that the FIRST PART of the FIRST AMENDMENT is sacrosanct and that NO ONE "would ever" try to deprive a person of the right to freedom of religion..</p>
<p>At the time, I asked if ANYONE was willing to take a Sherman in defense of religious freedom..</p>
<p>Nobody wanted to...</p>
<p>Now we know why...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
