<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Corporate Politics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60764</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60764</guid>
		<description>Btw, CW, this really was a great column. I had a similar thought after watching what happened with the RFRA in Indiana but hadn&#039;t been able to think fully through it like you did here. 

Really nice piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, CW, this really was a great column. I had a similar thought after watching what happened with the RFRA in Indiana but hadn't been able to think fully through it like you did here. </p>
<p>Really nice piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60763</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60763</guid>
		<description>Marc Benioff of Salesforce was key to mobilizing the opposition. He threatened to pull out of Indiana. 

http://www.indystar.com/story/money/2015/04/02/salesforce-packed-punch-galvanizing-rfra-opposition/70842680/

Eli Lilly, Indiana&#039;s biggest employer, was also huge. 

Now if we can just get more corporate leadership on the economy. I think many, many corporations are frustrated with the short-term direction and multi-national favoritism of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc Benioff of Salesforce was key to mobilizing the opposition. He threatened to pull out of Indiana. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.indystar.com/story/money/2015/04/02/salesforce-packed-punch-galvanizing-rfra-opposition/70842680/" rel="nofollow">http://www.indystar.com/story/money/2015/04/02/salesforce-packed-punch-galvanizing-rfra-opposition/70842680/</a></p>
<p>Eli Lilly, Indiana's biggest employer, was also huge. </p>
<p>Now if we can just get more corporate leadership on the economy. I think many, many corporations are frustrated with the short-term direction and multi-national favoritism of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60752</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60752</guid>
		<description>Oh Frak..  Wrong commentary...

Sorry about that...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Frak..  Wrong commentary...</p>
<p>Sorry about that...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60751</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60751</guid>
		<description>Jefferson was a slave owner..

I guess the Jefferson Memorial must be torn down as it&#039;s a &quot;symbol of hate.&quot;

Can&#039;t ya&#039;all fathom how ridiculous this all is???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jefferson was a slave owner..</p>
<p>I guess the Jefferson Memorial must be torn down as it's a "symbol of hate."</p>
<p>Can't ya'all fathom how ridiculous this all is???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60749</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60749</guid>
		<description>dsws [13] -

That&#039;s an interesting point.  What I wondered about Ebay was what about actual historical antiques?  Would an authentic battle flag from the era be allowed?

Didn&#039;t really come up with an answer, just wanted to toss it out there.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsws [13] -</p>
<p>That's an interesting point.  What I wondered about Ebay was what about actual historical antiques?  Would an authentic battle flag from the era be allowed?</p>
<p>Didn't really come up with an answer, just wanted to toss it out there.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60746</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60746</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Stores like Sears and Wal-Mart suddenly announced they would halt selling all merchandise with the Confederate battle flag on it. This trickle soon turned into a flood, as they were joined by Amazon and eBay and Kmart (and, doubtlessly by the time you read this, many others).&lt;/i&gt;

As I draw the line, Sears, Kmart, and Walmart were right, and eBay and Amazon were wrong.  No one should buy a Confederate flag; no one should sell a Confederate flag.  But no one should make that decision for anyone else.

Suppose the shoe were on the other foot.  Suppose someone with the requisite financial clout had decided to suppress the sale of merchandise bearing the name, image, or words of Malcolm X or MLK.  If they decided to stop selling it in their own store, I would disagree with their decision, but acknowledge their right to decide what they wanted to sell.  If they decided to take advantage of their control of what amounts to commercial infrastructure, and make it hard for other people to sell MLK merchandise, I would object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Stores like Sears and Wal-Mart suddenly announced they would halt selling all merchandise with the Confederate battle flag on it. This trickle soon turned into a flood, as they were joined by Amazon and eBay and Kmart (and, doubtlessly by the time you read this, many others).</i></p>
<p>As I draw the line, Sears, Kmart, and Walmart were right, and eBay and Amazon were wrong.  No one should buy a Confederate flag; no one should sell a Confederate flag.  But no one should make that decision for anyone else.</p>
<p>Suppose the shoe were on the other foot.  Suppose someone with the requisite financial clout had decided to suppress the sale of merchandise bearing the name, image, or words of Malcolm X or MLK.  If they decided to stop selling it in their own store, I would disagree with their decision, but acknowledge their right to decide what they wanted to sell.  If they decided to take advantage of their control of what amounts to commercial infrastructure, and make it hard for other people to sell MLK merchandise, I would object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60745</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60745</guid>
		<description>re·dun·dant
r??d?nd?nt/
adjective
adjective: redundant

    not or no longer needed or useful; superfluous.
    &quot;this redundant brewery has been converted into a library&quot;
    synonyms:	unnecessary, not required, inessential, unessential, needless, unneeded, uncalled for; More
    surplus, superfluous
    &quot;the system is hobbled by redundant paperwork&quot;
    antonyms:	essential, necessary
        (of words or data) able to be omitted without loss of meaning or function.
        Engineering
        (of a component) not strictly necessary to functioning but included in case of failure in another component.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re·dun·dant<br />
r??d?nd?nt/<br />
adjective<br />
adjective: redundant</p>
<p>    not or no longer needed or useful; superfluous.<br />
    "this redundant brewery has been converted into a library"<br />
    synonyms:	unnecessary, not required, inessential, unessential, needless, unneeded, uncalled for; More<br />
    surplus, superfluous<br />
    "the system is hobbled by redundant paperwork"<br />
    antonyms:	essential, necessary<br />
        (of words or data) able to be omitted without loss of meaning or function.<br />
        Engineering<br />
        (of a component) not strictly necessary to functioning but included in case of failure in another component.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60744</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60744</guid>
		<description>Something is redundant if it&#039;s unnecessary because something else fulfills the same function.  The correct term for a definition of that form would be &quot;recursion&quot; or &quot;self-reference&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something is redundant if it's unnecessary because something else fulfills the same function.  The correct term for a definition of that form would be "recursion" or "self-reference".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60742</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 22:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60742</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Robin Williams had it right.&lt;/I&gt;

He usually does..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Robin Williams had it right.</i></p>
<p>He usually does..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60740</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60740</guid>
		<description>Heh. 

Robin Williams had it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. </p>
<p>Robin Williams had it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60735</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60735</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll have to speak to Robin Williams about that..

I was just quoting him...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You'll have to speak to Robin Williams about that..</p>
<p>I was just quoting him...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60734</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60734</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not what &quot;redundant&quot; means.  &quot;Redundant&quot; means something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's not what "redundant" means.  "Redundant" means something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60731</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60731</guid>
		<description>Yea, I had noticed that...  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;In the dictionary under &#039;redundant&#039; it says, &#039;see redundant&#039;..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

:D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I had noticed that...  :D</p>
<p><b>"In the dictionary under 'redundant' it says, 'see redundant'.."</b></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60730</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60730</guid>
		<description>4-

should have read: &quot;Alternate ID of Corporate responsibility&quot;

Tiny tablet screen strikes again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4-</p>
<p>should have read: "Alternate ID of Corporate responsibility"</p>
<p>Tiny tablet screen strikes again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60724</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60724</guid>
		<description>Corporate Citizenship is a well recognized concept in the business world, often under the alternate ID of Corporate Citizenship.   In the progressive variant, management recognizes the company is better off when the whole community is better off.   Companies like Kodak (Rochester) and NCR (Dayton) were instrumental in providing leadership (and cash flow) that turned small towns into well run small cities.  When localized business globalized and decamped starting in the &#039;70s, their host cities took a huge hit.

Things tend to run in cycles.  Maybe Rockefeller Republicanism is about to make a comeback?  That would be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporate Citizenship is a well recognized concept in the business world, often under the alternate ID of Corporate Citizenship.   In the progressive variant, management recognizes the company is better off when the whole community is better off.   Companies like Kodak (Rochester) and NCR (Dayton) were instrumental in providing leadership (and cash flow) that turned small towns into well run small cities.  When localized business globalized and decamped starting in the '70s, their host cities took a huge hit.</p>
<p>Things tend to run in cycles.  Maybe Rockefeller Republicanism is about to make a comeback?  That would be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60716</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60716</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;. That&#039;s the whole point, after all -- economically punishing a corporation for perceived wrongdoing (moral or political) and getting them to not only see the error of their ways but also to make a conscious business decision to change course.&lt;/I&gt;

Call it what it is.   

Economic terrorism...

Attacking/punishing innocent people to change the operating ways of an entity that the people hurt have little or no control over...

I can give you dozens, if not hundreds of examples...

&lt;I&gt;But when they take tentative steps towards responsible corporate citizenship, they do deserve to be applauded.&lt;/I&gt;

here here...

Credit where credit is due....  That&#039;s what I always say...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>. That's the whole point, after all -- economically punishing a corporation for perceived wrongdoing (moral or political) and getting them to not only see the error of their ways but also to make a conscious business decision to change course.</i></p>
<p>Call it what it is.   </p>
<p>Economic terrorism...</p>
<p>Attacking/punishing innocent people to change the operating ways of an entity that the people hurt have little or no control over...</p>
<p>I can give you dozens, if not hundreds of examples...</p>
<p><i>But when they take tentative steps towards responsible corporate citizenship, they do deserve to be applauded.</i></p>
<p>here here...</p>
<p>Credit where credit is due....  That's what I always say...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60710</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 06:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60710</guid>
		<description>LizM -

Yeah, I wrote this because I think something&#039;s going on that few are noticing in terms of changing attitudes on corporate boards.  Corporations are starting to take the lead in being progressive -- a welcome development indeed.  One that should be applauded, even conditionally.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LizM -</p>
<p>Yeah, I wrote this because I think something's going on that few are noticing in terms of changing attitudes on corporate boards.  Corporations are starting to take the lead in being progressive -- a welcome development indeed.  One that should be applauded, even conditionally.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comment-60706</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861#comment-60706</guid>
		<description>Chris,

&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m not wearing rosy-colored glasses here -- American corporations have a long way to go on a huge number of other issues. But when they take tentative steps towards responsible corporate citizenship, they do deserve to be applauded.&lt;/I&gt;

Excellent column ... and a pleasure to read! I&#039;m just really, really happy to see some positive developments that are truly worth applauding. Ironic that it&#039;s coming from the corporate world but, at this point, I&#039;ll take it where I can get it.

Who knows, rose-coloured glasses and cockeyed optimism notwithstanding, this could be a very significant and historic turning point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p><i>I'm not wearing rosy-colored glasses here -- American corporations have a long way to go on a huge number of other issues. But when they take tentative steps towards responsible corporate citizenship, they do deserve to be applauded.</i></p>
<p>Excellent column ... and a pleasure to read! I'm just really, really happy to see some positive developments that are truly worth applauding. Ironic that it's coming from the corporate world but, at this point, I'll take it where I can get it.</p>
<p>Who knows, rose-coloured glasses and cockeyed optimism notwithstanding, this could be a very significant and historic turning point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
