<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton Campaign Coverage, So Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 02:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60271</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60271</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The general election will be close in the popular vote, but it may be a rout in the electoral college.&lt;/I&gt;

The Popular Vote is only relevant when a particular wins the popular vote...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The general election will be close in the popular vote, but it may be a rout in the electoral college.</i></p>
<p>The Popular Vote is only relevant when a particular wins the popular vote...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60235</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 00:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60235</guid>
		<description>The general election will be close in the popular vote, but it may be a rout in the electoral college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The general election will be close in the popular vote, but it may be a rout in the electoral college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60233</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60233</guid>
		<description>Changing the subject? #ClintonStrategyMissingArticleGate continues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changing the subject? #ClintonStrategyMissingArticleGate continues...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60231</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60231</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And the cover up continues...&lt;/I&gt;

Don&#039;t worry...

All will be revealed about Benghazi soon enough...  Once the Democrat Coronation is over and Dems can&#039;t pick up the pieces..

You watch...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And the cover up continues...</i></p>
<p>Don't worry...</p>
<p>All will be revealed about Benghazi soon enough...  Once the Democrat Coronation is over and Dems can't pick up the pieces..</p>
<p>You watch...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60224</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 19:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60224</guid>
		<description>And the cover up continues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the cover up continues...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60222</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60222</guid>
		<description>The article is not needed to answer the question, since the question has nothing to do with any specific campaign...

So, seems you got two choices..

ATFQ....

or

DYOFR

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is not needed to answer the question, since the question has nothing to do with any specific campaign...</p>
<p>So, seems you got two choices..</p>
<p>ATFQ....</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>DYOFR</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60221</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60221</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I know for a fact that she is..&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t. And until you produce said article, I&#039;m assuming you are just talking smack. 

Lots of simple questions. The ones based on reality can be interesting. Just hypothetical, not so much. Bring this one from the later in to the former: post the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I know for a fact that she is..</i></p>
<p>I don't. And until you produce said article, I'm assuming you are just talking smack. </p>
<p>Lots of simple questions. The ones based on reality can be interesting. Just hypothetical, not so much. Bring this one from the later in to the former: post the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60220</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60220</guid>
		<description>Bashi,

You don&#039;t believe Clinton is going with that strategy..

I know for a fact that she is..

But that is NOT the issue here..

The question is, IS it a good strategy....

Even if I am totally frak&#039;ed in the head and Hillary is NOT going with that strategy, that doesn&#039;t have ANYTHING to do with the question at hand...

IS ignoring Independents and sticking to Party Faithful in the General Election a good strategy???

It&#039;s a simple question...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bashi,</p>
<p>You don't believe Clinton is going with that strategy..</p>
<p>I know for a fact that she is..</p>
<p>But that is NOT the issue here..</p>
<p>The question is, IS it a good strategy....</p>
<p>Even if I am totally frak'ed in the head and Hillary is NOT going with that strategy, that doesn't have ANYTHING to do with the question at hand...</p>
<p>IS ignoring Independents and sticking to Party Faithful in the General Election a good strategy???</p>
<p>It's a simple question...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60219</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60219</guid>
		<description>All right! now we are getting someplace. We now know it&#039;s an article and from the NYT. 

Are you going to share which article? Or is this to remain a super secret, classified, need the know, locked in a vault kind of thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right! now we are getting someplace. We now know it's an article and from the NYT. </p>
<p>Are you going to share which article? Or is this to remain a super secret, classified, need the know, locked in a vault kind of thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60218</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60218</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Hillary could campaign only while skydiving for the next 18 months. Interesting to ponder for a second or two but in reality a purely hypothetical and generally meaningless. &lt;/I&gt;

Yea... SURE she could...  

&lt;I&gt;Same goes for your current line of reasoning unless you can back it up...&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s not *MY* reasoning...

It&#039;s the NY TIMES reasoning..

I just happen to agree with it..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hillary could campaign only while skydiving for the next 18 months. Interesting to ponder for a second or two but in reality a purely hypothetical and generally meaningless. </i></p>
<p>Yea... SURE she could...  </p>
<p><i>Same goes for your current line of reasoning unless you can back it up...</i></p>
<p>It's not *MY* reasoning...</p>
<p>It's the NY TIMES reasoning..</p>
<p>I just happen to agree with it..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60215</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60215</guid>
		<description>Re-12

the referenced pic should have been:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U8YMvxPGt9s/UJwofeXtKUI/AAAAAAAAEoc/4RDlrYnIk-4/s400/magooghostfuture2.png

TheStig regrets the error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-12</p>
<p>the referenced pic should have been:</p>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U8YMvxPGt9s/UJwofeXtKUI/AAAAAAAAEoc/4RDlrYnIk-4/s400/magooghostfuture2.png" rel="nofollow">http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U8YMvxPGt9s/UJwofeXtKUI/AAAAAAAAEoc/4RDlrYnIk-4/s400/magooghostfuture2.png</a></p>
<p>TheStig regrets the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60214</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60214</guid>
		<description>Just in:

The Iowa Straw Poll collapsed suddenly today and died.  Witnesses say Mr. Poll appeared to have choked on a corn dog. Heroic attempts to resuscitate it by Michele Bachmann proved unsuccessful.  Mr. Poll had been in declining health for many years and long time associates noted increasingly erratic behavior as well as delusions of self-importance.  Donations may be sent to the Republican Party in lieu of straw.

http://www.christmastvhistory.com/2012/11/happy-50th-birthday-mr-magoos-christmas.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in:</p>
<p>The Iowa Straw Poll collapsed suddenly today and died.  Witnesses say Mr. Poll appeared to have choked on a corn dog. Heroic attempts to resuscitate it by Michele Bachmann proved unsuccessful.  Mr. Poll had been in declining health for many years and long time associates noted increasingly erratic behavior as well as delusions of self-importance.  Donations may be sent to the Republican Party in lieu of straw.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.christmastvhistory.com/2012/11/happy-50th-birthday-mr-magoos-christmas.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.christmastvhistory.com/2012/11/happy-50th-birthday-mr-magoos-christmas.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60213</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60213</guid>
		<description>Hillary could campaign only while skydiving for the next 18 months. Interesting to ponder for a second or two but in reality a purely hypothetical and generally meaningless. Same goes for your current line of reasoning unless you can back it up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary could campaign only while skydiving for the next 18 months. Interesting to ponder for a second or two but in reality a purely hypothetical and generally meaningless. Same goes for your current line of reasoning unless you can back it up...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60212</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60212</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very simple question..

Is ignoring the Independents and playing it safe with Party Faithful a good strategy for ANY POTUS candidate???

I can understand WHY Clinton is going with that strategy...  She has no testicular fortitude when it comes to hard questions or hostile crowds..

She get&#039;s all hysterical and yells, &lt;B&gt;WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!!!???&lt;/B&gt;

So, I can see WHY Clinton is going with the Party Faithful/Friendly Crowds Only strategy...

I am simply saying she will lose with that stragety...

Obama was able to make that strategy work in 2012 by the skin of his teeth because he had the charisma to make it work...

Clinton doesn&#039;t have an OUNCE of skill to make it work..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a very simple question..</p>
<p>Is ignoring the Independents and playing it safe with Party Faithful a good strategy for ANY POTUS candidate???</p>
<p>I can understand WHY Clinton is going with that strategy...  She has no testicular fortitude when it comes to hard questions or hostile crowds..</p>
<p>She get's all hysterical and yells, <b>WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!!!???</b></p>
<p>So, I can see WHY Clinton is going with the Party Faithful/Friendly Crowds Only strategy...</p>
<p>I am simply saying she will lose with that stragety...</p>
<p>Obama was able to make that strategy work in 2012 by the skin of his teeth because he had the charisma to make it work...</p>
<p>Clinton doesn't have an OUNCE of skill to make it work..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60211</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60211</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Cluck bwuk bock bock cluck cluck gluck cluck gawk cluck cluck! Gluck glcuk bock cluck cluck gwuck bock bwok b`gawk gluck gluck b&#039;gawk bock cluck cluck bwuk gluck bwuk, bwuk cluck bock,b&#039;gawk-gawk cluck, gluck gluck b`gawk gluck bock cluck gawk cluck cluck!! Cluck cluck cluck, bwuk bwuk gluck b`gawk bwuk gluck cluck. Cluck gluck bwuk, gawk gawk cluck gluck, bwuk-bwuk, cluck-bwuk, gwuk bwuk cluck!&lt;/I&gt;

http://tinyurl.com/kekgqhj


:D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Cluck bwuk bock bock cluck cluck gluck cluck gawk cluck cluck! Gluck glcuk bock cluck cluck gwuck bock bwok b`gawk gluck gluck b'gawk bock cluck cluck bwuk gluck bwuk, bwuk cluck bock,b'gawk-gawk cluck, gluck gluck b`gawk gluck bock cluck gawk cluck cluck!! Cluck cluck cluck, bwuk bwuk gluck b`gawk bwuk gluck cluck. Cluck gluck bwuk, gawk gawk cluck gluck, bwuk-bwuk, cluck-bwuk, gwuk bwuk cluck!</i></p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/kekgqhj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/kekgqhj</a></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60210</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60210</guid>
		<description>Cute..  :D

Do you have a YouTube of you doing that??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute..  :D</p>
<p>Do you have a YouTube of you doing that??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60209</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60209</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I&#039;ll be happy to back it up... Just a simple yes or no answer from you would be all it takes. :D&lt;/i&gt;

Cluck bwuk bock bock cluck cluck gluck cluck gawk cluck cluck! Gluck glcuk bock cluck cluck gwuck bock bwok b`gawk gluck gluck &lt;b&gt;b&#039;gawk&lt;/b&gt; bock cluck cluck bwuk gluck bwuk, bwuk cluck bock,&lt;b&gt;b&#039;gawk-gawk&lt;/b&gt; cluck, gluck gluck b`gawk gluck bock cluck gawk cluck cluck!! &lt;i&gt;Cluck cluck cluck, bwuk bwuk gluck b`gawk bwuk gluck cluck.&lt;/i&gt; Cluck gluck bwuk, gawk gawk cluck gluck, bwuk-bwuk, &lt;b&gt;cluck-bwuk&lt;/b&gt;, gwuk bwuk cluck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'll be happy to back it up... Just a simple yes or no answer from you would be all it takes. :D</i></p>
<p>Cluck bwuk bock bock cluck cluck gluck cluck gawk cluck cluck! Gluck glcuk bock cluck cluck gwuck bock bwok b`gawk gluck gluck <b>b'gawk</b> bock cluck cluck bwuk gluck bwuk, bwuk cluck bock,<b>b'gawk-gawk</b> cluck, gluck gluck b`gawk gluck bock cluck gawk cluck cluck!! <i>Cluck cluck cluck, bwuk bwuk gluck b`gawk bwuk gluck cluck.</i> Cluck gluck bwuk, gawk gawk cluck gluck, bwuk-bwuk, <b>cluck-bwuk</b>, gwuk bwuk cluck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60208</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60208</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Democratic response: &quot;It&#039;s still better than another Bush in the White house...&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s a matter of opinion not shared by the majority of Americans..

Having said that, it&#039;s all be certain that Bush will NOT be the GOP Candidate, so such a response would be irrelevant..

 &lt;I&gt;You just love that line. Are you ever going to back it up? &lt;/I&gt;

I&#039;ll be happy to back it up...  Just a simple yes or no answer from you would be all it takes.  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Democratic response: "It's still better than another Bush in the White house..."</i></p>
<p>That's a matter of opinion not shared by the majority of Americans..</p>
<p>Having said that, it's all be certain that Bush will NOT be the GOP Candidate, so such a response would be irrelevant..</p>
<p> <i>You just love that line. Are you ever going to back it up? </i></p>
<p>I'll be happy to back it up...  Just a simple yes or no answer from you would be all it takes.  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60207</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60207</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Does this country REALLY want Bill Clinton back in the White House??&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Democratic response: &quot;It&#039;s still better than another Bush in the White house...&quot;

&lt;i&gt;Ignore the Independents and excite the base..&lt;/i&gt;

You just love that line. Are you ever going to back it up? I mean at this point it must really not say anything of the sort if you are that chicken to post the article....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"Does this country REALLY want Bill Clinton back in the White House??"</i></p>
<p>Democratic response: "It's still better than another Bush in the White house..."</p>
<p><i>Ignore the Independents and excite the base..</i></p>
<p>You just love that line. Are you ever going to back it up? I mean at this point it must really not say anything of the sort if you are that chicken to post the article....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60206</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60206</guid>
		<description>I am also constrained to point out that Hillary doesn&#039;t have, nor NEED, a Primary strategy...

According to media reports, she has already moved past the Democrat Coronation and readied her General Election plan..

It&#039;s the Obama Plan....

Ignore the Independents and excite the base..

The problem for Hillary is that Obama is a charismatic campaigner and that worked for him...

Hillary has all the charisma of day old armadillo road kill...

The General is gonna be a rout....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also constrained to point out that Hillary doesn't have, nor NEED, a Primary strategy...</p>
<p>According to media reports, she has already moved past the Democrat Coronation and readied her General Election plan..</p>
<p>It's the Obama Plan....</p>
<p>Ignore the Independents and excite the base..</p>
<p>The problem for Hillary is that Obama is a charismatic campaigner and that worked for him...</p>
<p>Hillary has all the charisma of day old armadillo road kill...</p>
<p>The General is gonna be a rout....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60205</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60205</guid>
		<description>The best GOP Ad slogan ever.

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Does this country REALLY want Bill Clinton back in the White House??&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best GOP Ad slogan ever.</p>
<p><b>"Does this country REALLY want Bill Clinton back in the White House??"</b></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60201</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60201</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;but Hillary Clinton knows better than most politicians the dividends that can be reaped from respectfully listening to voters. &lt;/I&gt;

Perhaps she does..

If so, the question is begged. Why didn&#039;t she DO that?? 

Why didn&#039;t she respectfully listen to voters, rather than stage events and give Democrat activists scripts to read from??

Excellent commentary..

Clinton is allegedly going to actually &quot;begin&quot; her campaign..  She is going to have actually meet actual voters and actually have to answer actual spur of the moment questions.

She is going to be toast...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but Hillary Clinton knows better than most politicians the dividends that can be reaped from respectfully listening to voters. </i></p>
<p>Perhaps she does..</p>
<p>If so, the question is begged. Why didn't she DO that?? </p>
<p>Why didn't she respectfully listen to voters, rather than stage events and give Democrat activists scripts to read from??</p>
<p>Excellent commentary..</p>
<p>Clinton is allegedly going to actually "begin" her campaign..  She is going to have actually meet actual voters and actually have to answer actual spur of the moment questions.</p>
<p>She is going to be toast...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comment-60199</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 05:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816#comment-60199</guid>
		<description>A woman is going to become president. Maybe they can stop her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman is going to become president. Maybe they can stop her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
