<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Santorum And Pataki Jump In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 05:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59794</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 01:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59794</guid>
		<description>The boat is getting a bit tippy now that Santorum and Pataki have jumped in. While I&#039;m still pushing for GOP Survivor and a sweet sixteen (or more) cast, I have an alternative in case licensing the Survivor Franchise breaks down.

If the herd must be culled to avoid overgrazing the question time, why not do it using a weighted random lottery, with the individual weighting factors being proportional to a candidates averaged polling percentages since the last debate.  If there are 12 candidates and 6 slots, there will be 6 random drawings.  A candidate can only win once, so the next drawing will only have 11 contestants and the odds are recalculated to match the new relative strengths of the field. And so on, with drawing for the next 4,3,2,1 slots.  Anybody can win a place, but the stronger your polls, the more likely you&#039;ll get a berth. This nicely gets around the notch problem, where one or two percentage points might determine a winner from a loser.  Dark horses can have interesting ideas, and some will likely creep through....if not in this &quot;debate&quot; then maybe next, as candidates prosper or pull out, or fickle fate intervenes.

The best feature is the drawing process, which should be conducted on air, with beautiful people doing the drawing.  Just like your State Lotto.  In fact, why not combine the two.  Viewers can place their bets on favored horse...or a trifecta and such for higher payoffs.  TV ratings would skyrocket!  The kid&#039;s college money is riding on this! That might actually get decent viewership for the debates, which in theory ought to be good in a country with representative government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The boat is getting a bit tippy now that Santorum and Pataki have jumped in. While I'm still pushing for GOP Survivor and a sweet sixteen (or more) cast, I have an alternative in case licensing the Survivor Franchise breaks down.</p>
<p>If the herd must be culled to avoid overgrazing the question time, why not do it using a weighted random lottery, with the individual weighting factors being proportional to a candidates averaged polling percentages since the last debate.  If there are 12 candidates and 6 slots, there will be 6 random drawings.  A candidate can only win once, so the next drawing will only have 11 contestants and the odds are recalculated to match the new relative strengths of the field. And so on, with drawing for the next 4,3,2,1 slots.  Anybody can win a place, but the stronger your polls, the more likely you'll get a berth. This nicely gets around the notch problem, where one or two percentage points might determine a winner from a loser.  Dark horses can have interesting ideas, and some will likely creep through....if not in this "debate" then maybe next, as candidates prosper or pull out, or fickle fate intervenes.</p>
<p>The best feature is the drawing process, which should be conducted on air, with beautiful people doing the drawing.  Just like your State Lotto.  In fact, why not combine the two.  Viewers can place their bets on favored horse...or a trifecta and such for higher payoffs.  TV ratings would skyrocket!  The kid's college money is riding on this! That might actually get decent viewership for the debates, which in theory ought to be good in a country with representative government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59793</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59793</guid>
		<description>M -7,8

Shocking, not really.  Clinton hobnobs with the rich and famous and there are plenty of scoundrels in the R&amp;F demographic. So far as I know, Scoundrel is not always tattooed on the back of their necks.  All I see in the media reports so far is guilt by association.  That&#039;s a start, but you don&#039;t have any more than that until you can show Clinton bribed FIFA (quid pro quo), FIFA bribed Clinton or Clinton misappropriated funds donated by FIFA, and such like. Oh, I forgot, the Clinton has to be Hillary to obtain effective stickage (new word).  

Political mud slinging is an American Political Tradition, but it has a much lower bar than the law, or even accounting.  Used car sales is probably close. Mud slinging persists because it can credibly pass for truth longer than the shelf life of canned tuna. 

Hang in there Michale, where there is a wire, there is hope. I&#039;m still holding out for an evidentiary anvil to hit Chris Christie.  Until then, it boils down to taste, strength of stomach and the Lesser of Two Lizards Political Principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M -7,8</p>
<p>Shocking, not really.  Clinton hobnobs with the rich and famous and there are plenty of scoundrels in the R&amp;F demographic. So far as I know, Scoundrel is not always tattooed on the back of their necks.  All I see in the media reports so far is guilt by association.  That's a start, but you don't have any more than that until you can show Clinton bribed FIFA (quid pro quo), FIFA bribed Clinton or Clinton misappropriated funds donated by FIFA, and such like. Oh, I forgot, the Clinton has to be Hillary to obtain effective stickage (new word).  </p>
<p>Political mud slinging is an American Political Tradition, but it has a much lower bar than the law, or even accounting.  Used car sales is probably close. Mud slinging persists because it can credibly pass for truth longer than the shelf life of canned tuna. </p>
<p>Hang in there Michale, where there is a wire, there is hope. I'm still holding out for an evidentiary anvil to hit Chris Christie.  Until then, it boils down to taste, strength of stomach and the Lesser of Two Lizards Political Principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59792</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59792</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Not really off-topic because the Clintons are up to their eyeballs in the FIFA scandal/corruption...&lt;/I&gt;

Shocking... iddn&#039;t it??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Not really off-topic because the Clintons are up to their eyeballs in the FIFA scandal/corruption...</i></p>
<p>Shocking... iddn't it??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59791</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 21:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59791</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Off topic, but FIFA can&#039;t hide it&#039;s Blatter control problem.&lt;/I&gt;

Not really off-topic because the Clintons are up to their eyeballs in the FIFA scandal/corruption...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Off topic, but FIFA can't hide it's Blatter control problem.</i></p>
<p>Not really off-topic because the Clintons are up to their eyeballs in the FIFA scandal/corruption...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59790</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 17:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59790</guid>
		<description>Off topic, but FIFA can&#039;t hide it&#039;s Blatter control problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic, but FIFA can't hide it's Blatter control problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59787</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 12:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59787</guid>
		<description>Santorum and Pataki are an interesting contrast.  Pataki lacks name recgnition, Santorum has too much name recognition, a problem shared by Rick Perry who has adopted Kissinger glasses as a disguise.  Two percent polling numbers suggest it&#039;s not working Rick.

Is Pataki angling for VP slot?  Bush has to veer right to win the primaries, Pataki brings moderation to the ticket and adds North to South.  If you&#039;re looking to follow in Teddy&#039;s footsteps, VP follows governor.  On the other hand, Pataki&#039;s strict  gun control stance suggests he&#039;s not totally relying on history repeating itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Santorum and Pataki are an interesting contrast.  Pataki lacks name recgnition, Santorum has too much name recognition, a problem shared by Rick Perry who has adopted Kissinger glasses as a disguise.  Two percent polling numbers suggest it's not working Rick.</p>
<p>Is Pataki angling for VP slot?  Bush has to veer right to win the primaries, Pataki brings moderation to the ticket and adds North to South.  If you're looking to follow in Teddy's footsteps, VP follows governor.  On the other hand, Pataki's strict  gun control stance suggests he's not totally relying on history repeating itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59786</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 09:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59786</guid>
		<description>Having said that, if it came down to a choice between Cruz and O&#039;Malley??

I have to admit, I would really have to think about that...   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having said that, if it came down to a choice between Cruz and O'Malley??</p>
<p>I have to admit, I would really have to think about that...   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59785</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 09:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59785</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Cool. I hope we have an actual alternative to Hillary, &lt;/I&gt;

Good luck with that.  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Yer old Mother Hubbard and only VAUGHN&#039;S in the cupboard!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Randy Quaid, MAJOR LEAGUE II  

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Cool. I hope we have an actual alternative to Hillary, </i></p>
<p>Good luck with that.  :D</p>
<p><b>"Yer old Mother Hubbard and only VAUGHN'S in the cupboard!!"</b><br />
-Randy Quaid, MAJOR LEAGUE II  </p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59783</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 01:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59783</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see that Frothy is in and his sugar daddy is back, but he still has that Google problem and the blahs will never vote for him. In addition, he&#039;s already lost the Duggar demographic to Hickabee. What a mess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad to see that Frothy is in and his sugar daddy is back, but he still has that Google problem and the blahs will never vote for him. In addition, he's already lost the Duggar demographic to Hickabee. What a mess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/27/santorum-and-pataki-jump-in/#comment-59782</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 01:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10756#comment-59782</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A side note: tune in to this column tomorrow when we&#039;ll be taking a look at Martin O&#039;Malley over on the Democratic side&lt;/i&gt;

Cool.  I hope we have an actual alternative to Hillary, who would have a better chance in the general campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A side note: tune in to this column tomorrow when we'll be taking a look at Martin O'Malley over on the Democratic side</i></p>
<p>Cool.  I hope we have an actual alternative to Hillary, who would have a better chance in the general campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
