<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points [328] -- Obama&#039;s Gutsy Move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 07:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54744</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54744</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;But, make no mistake about it, Chuck Hagel is one of America&#039;s great public servants, a class act, all the way. &lt;/I&gt;

While I disagree with Hagel on many things, it&#039;s the fact that he IS an honorable public servant is exactly why Obama forced him out..

Obama just wants a mouth-piece, a figure head at the Pentagon so Obama and his goons can micro-manage the DoD from the West Wing...

It sure doesn&#039;t bode well for Obama&#039;s final 2 years (???) in office...

It doesn&#039;t bode well for the country either...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>But, make no mistake about it, Chuck Hagel is one of America's great public servants, a class act, all the way. </i></p>
<p>While I disagree with Hagel on many things, it's the fact that he IS an honorable public servant is exactly why Obama forced him out..</p>
<p>Obama just wants a mouth-piece, a figure head at the Pentagon so Obama and his goons can micro-manage the DoD from the West Wing...</p>
<p>It sure doesn't bode well for Obama's final 2 years (???) in office...</p>
<p>It doesn't bode well for the country either...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54741</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54741</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;No indictment in Ferguson case&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;I&gt;usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/11/24/ferguson-grand-jury-deliberations/19474907/&lt;/I&gt;

Ya know....

One of these days, ya&#039;all will acknowledge that, in instances such as this, LEO related and National Security related and Military related....  

One of these days ya&#039;all will acknowledge that I *DO* know what I am talking about...

If investigators looked beyond the emotionalism of the Left, looked beyond the hysteria of the Left...  If investigators looked solely and completely at the FACTS of the incident....

At &lt;B&gt;NO TIME&lt;/B&gt; was there EVER any doubt. There was NEVER any chance of an indictment...

I said the same thing 3+ months ago as I am saying right now...

Darren Wilson acted honorably.  He should be given a medal for his actions on that day...

I am proud to say as I was then as I am now...   I am proud to stand with Darren Wilson...

http://sjfm.us/temp/stand.jpg

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>No indictment in Ferguson case</b><br />
<i>usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/11/24/ferguson-grand-jury-deliberations/19474907/</i></p>
<p>Ya know....</p>
<p>One of these days, ya'all will acknowledge that, in instances such as this, LEO related and National Security related and Military related....  </p>
<p>One of these days ya'all will acknowledge that I *DO* know what I am talking about...</p>
<p>If investigators looked beyond the emotionalism of the Left, looked beyond the hysteria of the Left...  If investigators looked solely and completely at the FACTS of the incident....</p>
<p>At <b>NO TIME</b> was there EVER any doubt. There was NEVER any chance of an indictment...</p>
<p>I said the same thing 3+ months ago as I am saying right now...</p>
<p>Darren Wilson acted honorably.  He should be given a medal for his actions on that day...</p>
<p>I am proud to say as I was then as I am now...   I am proud to stand with Darren Wilson...</p>
<p><a href="http://sjfm.us/temp/stand.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://sjfm.us/temp/stand.jpg</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54739</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 01:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54739</guid>
		<description>Ten minutes and counting....

A million quatloos says there is no indictment...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten minutes and counting....</p>
<p>A million quatloos says there is no indictment...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54737</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54737</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Watch Pres. Obama Fumble Easy Question on Precedent&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/watch-president-obama-fumble-easy-question-precedent

This is exactly why our President is a moron...

He makes these Emperor-esque proclamations and simply cannot see how someone else might use them as precedent to make OTHER Emperor-esque proclamations...

There has never been an instance where a POTUS has made such damaging Executive Orders in the last 200 years...

If ya&#039;all don&#039;t believe me now, just wait until we have a GOP POTUS in the White House and he/she uses the Obama-Precedent to prosecutorially discrete tax/campaign prosecutions...

&lt;B&gt;THINK!!! Before you strike!&lt;/B&gt;
-Smokey The Bear

Basically ya&#039;all have come around to the idea that &lt;B&gt;THE ENDS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS&lt;/B&gt;...

{{sniffle}} I am so proud....    

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Watch Pres. Obama Fumble Easy Question on Precedent</b><br />
<a href="http://www.mrctv.org/blog/watch-president-obama-fumble-easy-question-precedent" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrctv.org/blog/watch-president-obama-fumble-easy-question-precedent</a></p>
<p>This is exactly why our President is a moron...</p>
<p>He makes these Emperor-esque proclamations and simply cannot see how someone else might use them as precedent to make OTHER Emperor-esque proclamations...</p>
<p>There has never been an instance where a POTUS has made such damaging Executive Orders in the last 200 years...</p>
<p>If ya'all don't believe me now, just wait until we have a GOP POTUS in the White House and he/she uses the Obama-Precedent to prosecutorially discrete tax/campaign prosecutions...</p>
<p><b>THINK!!! Before you strike!</b><br />
-Smokey The Bear</p>
<p>Basically ya'all have come around to the idea that <b>THE ENDS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS</b>...</p>
<p>{{sniffle}} I am so proud....    </p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54736</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54736</guid>
		<description>Looks like we&#039;re going to get a ruling in the Ferguson shooting...

It&#039;s a foregone conclusion..  There is simply no way in the universe that Wilson will be indicted.. 

To do so would put a bulls-eye on the back of every cop in the country...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like we're going to get a ruling in the Ferguson shooting...</p>
<p>It's a foregone conclusion..  There is simply no way in the universe that Wilson will be indicted.. </p>
<p>To do so would put a bulls-eye on the back of every cop in the country...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54735</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54735</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Well, that&#039;s what Biden is there for. :)&lt;/I&gt;

While I have no doubt that Biden would say what was on his mind (as he has proven time and time again  :D) the problem is that Obama and Biden are two of a kind and think the same things about the same agendas....

Our founding fathers had the right idea...

The VP should be the POTUS Candidate from the losing Party...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well, that's what Biden is there for. :)</i></p>
<p>While I have no doubt that Biden would say what was on his mind (as he has proven time and time again  :D) the problem is that Obama and Biden are two of a kind and think the same things about the same agendas....</p>
<p>Our founding fathers had the right idea...</p>
<p>The VP should be the POTUS Candidate from the losing Party...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54734</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54734</guid>
		<description>Seriously, Vice President Biden has always been one who has eschewed politics-as-usual and any sort of political shenanigans and I think he, perhaps more than anyone else in this administration, has been frustrated by the workings of Obama&#039;s inner circle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, Vice President Biden has always been one who has eschewed politics-as-usual and any sort of political shenanigans and I think he, perhaps more than anyone else in this administration, has been frustrated by the workings of Obama's inner circle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54733</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54733</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;For a leader to be effective, they need to surround themselves with people who will tell him/her how frak&#039;ed up they are.&lt;/I&gt;

Well, that&#039;s what Biden is there for. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>For a leader to be effective, they need to surround themselves with people who will tell him/her how frak'ed up they are.</i></p>
<p>Well, that's what Biden is there for. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54732</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54732</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I will say this, though, Obama&#039;s inner circle may be at the root of most of his problems, politically speaking and policymaking-wise.&lt;/I&gt;

I can say with complete and unequivocal honesty that I am 1000% in agreement with you...

For a leader to be effective, they need to surround themselves with people who will tell him/her how frak&#039;ed up they are.  

As opposed to people who will just say how awesome they are...

As an Elltee, I always made it a point to have my second be the guy/girl who disagreed with me on practically everything...

Only then can a leader make sound decisions..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I will say this, though, Obama's inner circle may be at the root of most of his problems, politically speaking and policymaking-wise.</i></p>
<p>I can say with complete and unequivocal honesty that I am 1000% in agreement with you...</p>
<p>For a leader to be effective, they need to surround themselves with people who will tell him/her how frak'ed up they are.  </p>
<p>As opposed to people who will just say how awesome they are...</p>
<p>As an Elltee, I always made it a point to have my second be the guy/girl who disagreed with me on practically everything...</p>
<p>Only then can a leader make sound decisions..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54731</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54731</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll see.

I will say this, though, Obama&#039;s inner circle may be at the root of most of his problems, politically speaking and policymaking-wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We'll see.</p>
<p>I will say this, though, Obama's inner circle may be at the root of most of his problems, politically speaking and policymaking-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54730</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54730</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I can&#039;t say that I&#039;m very surprised that Secretary Hagel is leaving the Pentagon. 

Just to make sure we are operating from the same set of facts..  

Hagel isn&#039;t &quot;leaving&quot;..  He is being fired...

&lt;I&gt;But, make no mistake about it, Chuck Hagel is one of America&#039;s great public servants, a class act, all the way. If more Republicans were capable of the kind of enlightened analysis that always characterized Hagel&#039;s positions on the issues - whether you agree or disagree with his stance on any single issue - then I am sure that there would not be the level of dysfunction that is so pervasive through all levels of leadership in Washington.&lt;/I&gt;

The problem with Hagel is he puts too much stock in diplomacy..  Which would be great, if he was a diplomat...

But a military leader that puts too much faith in diplomacy is easily manipulated..

&lt;I&gt;Finally, I would say that Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta are not made from the same stuff. And, that is why I am so sure that you will not be delighted by Hagel&#039;s memoirs, should he ever go that route.,&lt;/I&gt;

Perhaps...   But consider this...

Panetta left on GOOD terms with the Obama administration..  And he tore Obama a new one...

By all accounts, Hagel has been attacked and minimized by Obama&#039;s inner circle...

Something about Hell Hath No Fury and Scorned comes to mind..  :D

Let me just put it this way...

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised in the least if we see a Hagel Tell All  within the year...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I can't say that I'm very surprised that Secretary Hagel is leaving the Pentagon. </p>
<p>Just to make sure we are operating from the same set of facts..  </p>
<p>Hagel isn't "leaving"..  He is being fired...</p>
<p></i><i>But, make no mistake about it, Chuck Hagel is one of America's great public servants, a class act, all the way. If more Republicans were capable of the kind of enlightened analysis that always characterized Hagel's positions on the issues - whether you agree or disagree with his stance on any single issue - then I am sure that there would not be the level of dysfunction that is so pervasive through all levels of leadership in Washington.</i></p>
<p>The problem with Hagel is he puts too much stock in diplomacy..  Which would be great, if he was a diplomat...</p>
<p>But a military leader that puts too much faith in diplomacy is easily manipulated..</p>
<p><i>Finally, I would say that Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta are not made from the same stuff. And, that is why I am so sure that you will not be delighted by Hagel's memoirs, should he ever go that route.,</i></p>
<p>Perhaps...   But consider this...</p>
<p>Panetta left on GOOD terms with the Obama administration..  And he tore Obama a new one...</p>
<p>By all accounts, Hagel has been attacked and minimized by Obama's inner circle...</p>
<p>Something about Hell Hath No Fury and Scorned comes to mind..  :D</p>
<p>Let me just put it this way...</p>
<p>I wouldn't be surprised in the least if we see a Hagel Tell All  within the year...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54729</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54729</guid>
		<description>Michale,

I can&#039;t say that I&#039;m very surprised that Secretary Hagel is leaving the Pentagon. I think the reasons have much to do with his communication skills, or lack thereof (ironic, indeed, considering the ineffectiveness of President Obama, himself, in this regard), and with the fact that Hagel may not have the right personality to be effective as head of the Defense department.

But, make no mistake about it, Chuck Hagel is one of America&#039;s great public servants, a class act, all the way. If more Republicans were capable of the kind of enlightened analysis that always characterized Hagel&#039;s positions on the issues - whether you agree or disagree with his stance on any single issue - then I am sure that there would not be the level of dysfunction that is so pervasive through all levels of leadership in Washington.

Finally, I would say that Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta are not made from the same stuff. And, that is why I am so sure that you will not be delighted by Hagel&#039;s memoirs, should he ever go that route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>I can't say that I'm very surprised that Secretary Hagel is leaving the Pentagon. I think the reasons have much to do with his communication skills, or lack thereof (ironic, indeed, considering the ineffectiveness of President Obama, himself, in this regard), and with the fact that Hagel may not have the right personality to be effective as head of the Defense department.</p>
<p>But, make no mistake about it, Chuck Hagel is one of America's great public servants, a class act, all the way. If more Republicans were capable of the kind of enlightened analysis that always characterized Hagel's positions on the issues - whether you agree or disagree with his stance on any single issue - then I am sure that there would not be the level of dysfunction that is so pervasive through all levels of leadership in Washington.</p>
<p>Finally, I would say that Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta are not made from the same stuff. And, that is why I am so sure that you will not be delighted by Hagel's memoirs, should he ever go that route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54728</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54728</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I wouldn&#039;t hold your breath on that one, Michale, if I were you. I don&#039;t think he&#039;s the type.&lt;/I&gt;

Many said the same thing about Panetta...  If such a stalwart and loyal Democrat like Panetta was driven to expose the Obama frustration, I doubt Hagel will be able to resist.. 

His frustration with the Obama Administration is evident in his speeches...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I wouldn't hold your breath on that one, Michale, if I were you. I don't think he's the type.</i></p>
<p>Many said the same thing about Panetta...  If such a stalwart and loyal Democrat like Panetta was driven to expose the Obama frustration, I doubt Hagel will be able to resist.. </p>
<p>His frustration with the Obama Administration is evident in his speeches...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54727</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54727</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Can&#039;t wait to read Hagel&#039;s tell-all memoirs..&lt;/I&gt;

I wouldn&#039;t hold your breath on that one, Michale, if I were you. I don&#039;t think he&#039;s the type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Can't wait to read Hagel's tell-all memoirs..</i></p>
<p>I wouldn't hold your breath on that one, Michale, if I were you. I don't think he's the type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54726</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54726</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait to read Hagel&#039;s tell-all memoirs.. 

Considering how juicy Obama&#039;s past SecDef&#039;s memoirs were, Hagel&#039;s should complete the tri-fecta...    :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can't wait to read Hagel's tell-all memoirs.. </p>
<p>Considering how juicy Obama's past SecDef's memoirs were, Hagel's should complete the tri-fecta...    :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54725</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54725</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Obama Scapegoats Hagel&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102183397

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Obama Scapegoats Hagel</b><br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/102183397" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/102183397</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54724</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54724</guid>
		<description>There was a discussion in a previous commentary as to whether Obama&#039;s over-reach was based on a real need or based on politics..

Consider this..

It is undeniable that Obama&#039;s case for action would have been a LOT stronger if Obama had waiting and given the new GOP Congress a chance to get things done.. 

This is fact...

Further, it is also undeniable that Obama would have paid a HUGE, likely recoverable, political price if he backed out of his word again...  The Hispanic community would have crucified him...

Since the case for action would have been made STRONGER by Obama waiting, but POLITICS demanded that he acts now, the idea that the action was prompted by anything BUT politics is completely unsupported and without merit...

Again, if there is any flaws in my logic, by all means..  Point them out...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a discussion in a previous commentary as to whether Obama's over-reach was based on a real need or based on politics..</p>
<p>Consider this..</p>
<p>It is undeniable that Obama's case for action would have been a LOT stronger if Obama had waiting and given the new GOP Congress a chance to get things done.. </p>
<p>This is fact...</p>
<p>Further, it is also undeniable that Obama would have paid a HUGE, likely recoverable, political price if he backed out of his word again...  The Hispanic community would have crucified him...</p>
<p>Since the case for action would have been made STRONGER by Obama waiting, but POLITICS demanded that he acts now, the idea that the action was prompted by anything BUT politics is completely unsupported and without merit...</p>
<p>Again, if there is any flaws in my logic, by all means..  Point them out...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54723</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54723</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;How A Bill Becomes A Law
Schoolhouse Rock&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUDSeb2zHQ0

Art imitating life.

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>How A Bill Becomes A Law<br />
Schoolhouse Rock</b><br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUDSeb2zHQ0" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUDSeb2zHQ0</a></p>
<p>Art imitating life.</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54722</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54722</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;therefore, based on your own statement, hypocrisy from the Left in this case would require a condition other than reality. &lt;/I&gt;

Exactly!!!

The Left lives in their own little world that is far divorced from reality...  And, in that little world, Bush and the Right are pure evil incarnate and Obama walks on water and Democrats are as pure as the driven snow..

&lt;I&gt;thank you for clearing that up.&lt;/I&gt;

Yer welcome...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>therefore, based on your own statement, hypocrisy from the Left in this case would require a condition other than reality. </i></p>
<p>Exactly!!!</p>
<p>The Left lives in their own little world that is far divorced from reality...  And, in that little world, Bush and the Right are pure evil incarnate and Obama walks on water and Democrats are as pure as the driven snow..</p>
<p><i>thank you for clearing that up.</i></p>
<p>Yer welcome...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54721</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54721</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Bush didn&#039;t over-reach like Obama had done..

But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness...

So, if Bush HAD over-reached like Obama, as the Left had accused Bush of doing then the Left is hypocritical for condemning Bush for the same thing that the Left lets Obama get away with..&lt;/i&gt;

it&#039;s still self-disproving. you&#039;re saying that what obama and bush did were different. so unless democrats are somehow compelled to judge presidential actions by your priorities rather than their own. they&#039;re entitled to get upset about one set of actions and you&#039;re entitled to get equally upset about another.

&lt;i&gt; So, if Bush HAD over-reached like Obama, as the Left had accused Bush of doing then the Left is hypocritical for condemning Bush for the same thing that the Left lets Obama get away with..&lt;/i&gt;

therefore, based on your own statement, hypocrisy from the Left in this case would require a condition other than reality. thank you for clearing that up.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Bush didn't over-reach like Obama had done..</p>
<p>But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness...</p>
<p>So, if Bush HAD over-reached like Obama, as the Left had accused Bush of doing then the Left is hypocritical for condemning Bush for the same thing that the Left lets Obama get away with..</i></p>
<p>it's still self-disproving. you're saying that what obama and bush did were different. so unless democrats are somehow compelled to judge presidential actions by your priorities rather than their own. they're entitled to get upset about one set of actions and you're entitled to get equally upset about another.</p>
<p><i> So, if Bush HAD over-reached like Obama, as the Left had accused Bush of doing then the Left is hypocritical for condemning Bush for the same thing that the Left lets Obama get away with..</i></p>
<p>therefore, based on your own statement, hypocrisy from the Left in this case would require a condition other than reality. thank you for clearing that up.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54715</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2014 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54715</guid>
		<description>Ya know, it&#039;s rather ironic..

Obama taking matters into his own hands with his Executive Orders is no different than Arizona and other states passing their own immigration laws....

We know how the Left feels about THAT, eh??     :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya know, it's rather ironic..</p>
<p>Obama taking matters into his own hands with his Executive Orders is no different than Arizona and other states passing their own immigration laws....</p>
<p>We know how the Left feels about THAT, eh??     :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54714</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54714</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness

See!? I can make up words too!! :D hehehehehe&lt;/I&gt;

That may have appeared to be a little snotty.  I hope you accept it as the good-natured comment it was intended to be..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness</p>
<p>See!? I can make up words too!! :D hehehehehe</i></p>
<p>That may have appeared to be a little snotty.  I hope you accept it as the good-natured comment it was intended to be..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54713</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2014 10:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54713</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness&lt;/I&gt;

See!?  I can make up words too!!  :D  hehehehehe

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness</i></p>
<p>See!?  I can make up words too!!  :D  hehehehehe</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54711</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2014 09:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54711</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I don&#039;t mind that you disagree with me, but it gets confusing when your arguments conflict with each other in the same post.&lt;/I&gt;

I am just covering all the basis..  :D

Seriously, there really isn&#039;t any conflict in my positions.

Bush didn&#039;t over-reach like Obama had done..

But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness...

So, if Bush HAD over-reached like Obama, as the Left had accused Bush of doing then the Left is hypocritical for condemning Bush for the same thing that the Left lets Obama get away with..

Clearer now??  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don't mind that you disagree with me, but it gets confusing when your arguments conflict with each other in the same post.</i></p>
<p>I am just covering all the basis..  :D</p>
<p>Seriously, there really isn't any conflict in my positions.</p>
<p>Bush didn't over-reach like Obama had done..</p>
<p>But the Left ACCUSED Bush of over-reaching and reacted with their usual hysterical apopleticness...</p>
<p>So, if Bush HAD over-reached like Obama, as the Left had accused Bush of doing then the Left is hypocritical for condemning Bush for the same thing that the Left lets Obama get away with..</p>
<p>Clearer now??  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54707</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54707</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The redder the meat for Tea Partiers, though, the more it looks to the middle-of-the-road American like nothing short of petulance and whining.&lt;/i&gt;

Are the yellow stripes and dead armadillos actually paying any attention at all?

--

The presidency is too powerful.  

The Constitution assigns all powers to Congress.  Article II literally doesn&#039;t have a section 8.  The &quot;unitary executive&quot; nonsense is nonsense now, just as much as it was eight years ago.

Part of the reason Congress is so dysfunctional is simply that it &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; be.  As long as we&#039;re not hitting the debt ceiling or needing another continuing resolution to stave off the quasi-annual &quot;government shutdown&quot;, Congress is free to gather up thousands of pages of its own poo, escalate to defe-con 1, and fling it across the aisle: no one will care.  Everything is handled within the executive branch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The redder the meat for Tea Partiers, though, the more it looks to the middle-of-the-road American like nothing short of petulance and whining.</i></p>
<p>Are the yellow stripes and dead armadillos actually paying any attention at all?</p>
<p>--</p>
<p>The presidency is too powerful.  </p>
<p>The Constitution assigns all powers to Congress.  Article II literally doesn't have a section 8.  The "unitary executive" nonsense is nonsense now, just as much as it was eight years ago.</p>
<p>Part of the reason Congress is so dysfunctional is simply that it <i>can</i> be.  As long as we're not hitting the debt ceiling or needing another continuing resolution to stave off the quasi-annual "government shutdown", Congress is free to gather up thousands of pages of its own poo, escalate to defe-con 1, and fling it across the aisle: no one will care.  Everything is handled within the executive branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54705</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2014 00:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54705</guid>
		<description>[13] Exhibit A:

[&quot;unitary executive&quot; behavior coming from both bushes and reagan.]
&lt;i&gt;Which I have already proven is absolutely NOTHING like Obama did...&lt;/i&gt;

[13] Exhibit B:

&lt;i&gt;Whaa?? The Left is allowed to get hysterical over it when a GOP&#039;er does it, but approves when a DEM does it???&lt;/i&gt;

well, which is it? different or the same?

either it&#039;s different, in which case the Left is entitled to their opinion that what Bush did is worth getting apoplectic about but what Obama did isn&#039;t,

or it&#039;s the same, in which case they all did it, are equally culpable for it, and are equally deserving of scorn.

I don&#039;t mind that you disagree with me, but it gets confusing when your arguments conflict with each other in the same post.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[13] Exhibit A:</p>
<p>["unitary executive" behavior coming from both bushes and reagan.]<br />
<i>Which I have already proven is absolutely NOTHING like Obama did...</i></p>
<p>[13] Exhibit B:</p>
<p><i>Whaa?? The Left is allowed to get hysterical over it when a GOP'er does it, but approves when a DEM does it???</i></p>
<p>well, which is it? different or the same?</p>
<p>either it's different, in which case the Left is entitled to their opinion that what Bush did is worth getting apoplectic about but what Obama did isn't,</p>
<p>or it's the same, in which case they all did it, are equally culpable for it, and are equally deserving of scorn.</p>
<p>I don't mind that you disagree with me, but it gets confusing when your arguments conflict with each other in the same post.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54702</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54702</guid>
		<description>I am also constrained to point out that not all Democrats are on board with Obama&#039;s over-reach...

 Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., Joe Donnelly, D-Ind. and Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D. have all expressed concerns that Obama&#039;s actions are not good for the Democrat Party and not good for the country..

So, the forces lined up AGAINST Obama and his emperor-like edicts is completely and unequivocally bi-partisan....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also constrained to point out that not all Democrats are on board with Obama's over-reach...</p>
<p> Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., Joe Donnelly, D-Ind. and Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D. have all expressed concerns that Obama's actions are not good for the Democrat Party and not good for the country..</p>
<p>So, the forces lined up AGAINST Obama and his emperor-like edicts is completely and unequivocally bi-partisan....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54701</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54701</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny.... 

When I read about how great Obama and the Democrats think they are, all I can picture is this:

http://tinyurl.com/n2qw9es


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's funny.... </p>
<p>When I read about how great Obama and the Democrats think they are, all I can picture is this:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/n2qw9es" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/n2qw9es</a></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54699</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 20:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54699</guid>
		<description>About the only contemporary &quot;Imperial Presidency&quot; that you can compare Obama to is Richard Nixon&#039;s Administration..

And, considering the similarities between how the two POTUSes used the IRS, that&#039;s a very apt comparison...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the only contemporary "Imperial Presidency" that you can compare Obama to is Richard Nixon's Administration..</p>
<p>And, considering the similarities between how the two POTUSes used the IRS, that's a very apt comparison...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54698</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 20:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54698</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;that&#039;s elephanticulous.&lt;/I&gt;

How exactly is that pronounced???   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>that's elephanticulous.</i></p>
<p>How exactly is that pronounced???   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54697</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 20:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54697</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;CW mentioned instances of &quot;unitary executive&quot; behavior coming from both bushes and reagan. &lt;/I&gt;

Which I have already proven is absolutely NOTHING like Obama did..

&lt;I&gt;pretty much any time ANY president does something that pushes a bit against the balance of power between branches, the response from the legislative side is to try to cast that executive as trying to act like a king.&lt;/I&gt;

And yet, there is no example of this that approaches what Obama did back 200 years..

&lt;I&gt;as to whether &quot;bush did it morely&quot; is a legitimate response, i&#039;ll leave that up to the observer. i found an article about some recent presidents&#039; executive overreach here:&lt;/I&gt;

And, if I remember correctly, the Left had a hysterical conniption fit over it, INCLUDING Obama...

Whaa??  The Left is allowed to get hysterical over it when a GOP&#039;er does it, but approves when a DEM does it???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>CW mentioned instances of "unitary executive" behavior coming from both bushes and reagan. </i></p>
<p>Which I have already proven is absolutely NOTHING like Obama did..</p>
<p><i>pretty much any time ANY president does something that pushes a bit against the balance of power between branches, the response from the legislative side is to try to cast that executive as trying to act like a king.</i></p>
<p>And yet, there is no example of this that approaches what Obama did back 200 years..</p>
<p><i>as to whether "bush did it morely" is a legitimate response, i'll leave that up to the observer. i found an article about some recent presidents' executive overreach here:</i></p>
<p>And, if I remember correctly, the Left had a hysterical conniption fit over it, INCLUDING Obama...</p>
<p>Whaa??  The Left is allowed to get hysterical over it when a GOP'er does it, but approves when a DEM does it???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54696</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54696</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The fact that you had to go back almost 200 years to find an example of a POTUS acting like a monarch should be a clue to ya&#039;all how bad Obama has acted...&lt;/i&gt;

that&#039;s elephanticulous.

CW mentioned instances of &quot;unitary executive&quot; behavior coming from both bushes and reagan. pretty much any time ANY president does something that pushes a bit against the balance of power between branches, the response from the legislative side is to try to cast that executive as trying to act like a king. not that it&#039;s necessarily relevant to obama, but the charge of imperial president has been leveled the most at some of the presidents regarded as the best in history (Lincoln, FDR, Teddy Roosevelt). i would say FDR had the most imperial presidencey of all.

as to whether &quot;bush did it morely&quot; is a legitimate response, i&#039;ll leave that up to the observer. i found an article about some recent presidents&#039; executive overreach here:

http://civilliberty.about.com/od/waronterror/p/imperial101.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fact that you had to go back almost 200 years to find an example of a POTUS acting like a monarch should be a clue to ya'all how bad Obama has acted...</i></p>
<p>that's elephanticulous.</p>
<p>CW mentioned instances of "unitary executive" behavior coming from both bushes and reagan. pretty much any time ANY president does something that pushes a bit against the balance of power between branches, the response from the legislative side is to try to cast that executive as trying to act like a king. not that it's necessarily relevant to obama, but the charge of imperial president has been leveled the most at some of the presidents regarded as the best in history (Lincoln, FDR, Teddy Roosevelt). i would say FDR had the most imperial presidencey of all.</p>
<p>as to whether "bush did it morely" is a legitimate response, i'll leave that up to the observer. i found an article about some recent presidents' executive overreach here:</p>
<p><a href="http://civilliberty.about.com/od/waronterror/p/imperial101.htm" rel="nofollow">http://civilliberty.about.com/od/waronterror/p/imperial101.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54695</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54695</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Are you afraid of the truth, Michale? :)&lt;/I&gt;

Nope, truth is completely irrelevant because it&#039;s subjective..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;If it&#039;s truth you&#039;re after, Professor Tyree&#039;s philosophy class is right down the hall.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Indiana Jones

FACTS are the only relevant points...

&lt;I&gt;Is there any difference at all between what the president said he hadn&#039;t the authority to do and what he said he will now do by executive order?&lt;/I&gt;

No difference whatsoever...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you afraid of the truth, Michale? :)</i></p>
<p>Nope, truth is completely irrelevant because it's subjective..</p>
<p><b>"If it's truth you're after, Professor Tyree's philosophy class is right down the hall."</b><br />
-Indiana Jones</p>
<p>FACTS are the only relevant points...</p>
<p><i>Is there any difference at all between what the president said he hadn't the authority to do and what he said he will now do by executive order?</i></p>
<p>No difference whatsoever...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54694</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54694</guid>
		<description>Let me put it another way ...

Is there any difference at all between what the president said he hadn&#039;t the authority to do and what he said he will now do by executive order?

This is not a trick question. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me put it another way ...</p>
<p>Is there any difference at all between what the president said he hadn't the authority to do and what he said he will now do by executive order?</p>
<p>This is not a trick question. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54693</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54693</guid>
		<description>Are you afraid of the truth, Michale? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you afraid of the truth, Michale? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54692</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54692</guid>
		<description>There really isn&#039;t any gutsy about a President who gives a big and mighty &quot;FRAK YOU&quot; to the American people...

More of a totally moronic move..

ESPECIALLY considering this POTUS spent the previous few years telling people that he CAN&#039;T do what he just did...

And the MORON cherry on top is this POTUS saying, &quot;I haven&#039;t changed my position on this&quot;..

Mega Moron...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really isn't any gutsy about a President who gives a big and mighty "FRAK YOU" to the American people...</p>
<p>More of a totally moronic move..</p>
<p>ESPECIALLY considering this POTUS spent the previous few years telling people that he CAN'T do what he just did...</p>
<p>And the MORON cherry on top is this POTUS saying, "I haven't changed my position on this"..</p>
<p>Mega Moron...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54691</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54691</guid>
		<description>Do you like hard-working Mexicans?

I do not like them, Obamaman. 
I do not like those Mexicans.
 
Would you like them there or here?
 
I would not like them to be here. 
I do not like them, let’s be clear. 
I do not like those Mexicans. 
I do not like them, Obamaman.

Would you like them in a jail cell? 
Would you like to tell them go to hell? 

I do not like them to have a green card. 
I do not care if they work hard. 
I do not want them here, can’t you see? 
I do not want them to get amnesty. 
I do not like those Mexicans. 
I do not like them, Obamanman. 

Would you like them to self-deport? 
Would you like them if they can’t vote? 

Not with the Ebola. 
Not with an anchor baby. 
Not with a permit. 
Not even maybe. 
I do not like them on our side of the wall. 
I don’t want to see them, no not at all. 
I do not like those Mexicans. 
I do not like them, Obamanman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you like hard-working Mexicans?</p>
<p>I do not like them, Obamaman.<br />
I do not like those Mexicans.</p>
<p>Would you like them there or here?</p>
<p>I would not like them to be here.<br />
I do not like them, let’s be clear.<br />
I do not like those Mexicans.<br />
I do not like them, Obamaman.</p>
<p>Would you like them in a jail cell?<br />
Would you like to tell them go to hell? </p>
<p>I do not like them to have a green card.<br />
I do not care if they work hard.<br />
I do not want them here, can’t you see?<br />
I do not want them to get amnesty.<br />
I do not like those Mexicans.<br />
I do not like them, Obamanman. </p>
<p>Would you like them to self-deport?<br />
Would you like them if they can’t vote? </p>
<p>Not with the Ebola.<br />
Not with an anchor baby.<br />
Not with a permit.<br />
Not even maybe.<br />
I do not like them on our side of the wall.<br />
I don’t want to see them, no not at all.<br />
I do not like those Mexicans.<br />
I do not like them, Obamanman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54690</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54690</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Dare I say it? It&#039;s the Constitution stupid! Or the stupid Constitution. Ossification. If this be heresy, let&#039;s make the most of it.&lt;/I&gt;

I disagree with that premise.

Before answering, let me first repeat that I have long been a fan of America and a true believer in the promise of America.

Now, dare I say it ... it&#039;s the American people, stupid. Or should I say, it&#039;s the stupid American people. Of course, we could single out any number of countries in this regard but, for now, we&#039;re talking about America.

One way to remedy this serious political problem that is the root cause of much of the political dysfunction might be for the enlightened people to start really fighting back and not be afraid of the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Dare I say it? It's the Constitution stupid! Or the stupid Constitution. Ossification. If this be heresy, let's make the most of it.</i></p>
<p>I disagree with that premise.</p>
<p>Before answering, let me first repeat that I have long been a fan of America and a true believer in the promise of America.</p>
<p>Now, dare I say it ... it's the American people, stupid. Or should I say, it's the stupid American people. Of course, we could single out any number of countries in this regard but, for now, we're talking about America.</p>
<p>One way to remedy this serious political problem that is the root cause of much of the political dysfunction might be for the enlightened people to start really fighting back and not be afraid of the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54689</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54689</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s &quot;move&quot; seems to me more &quot;inevitable&quot; than &quot;gutsy&quot;.... and not really a &quot;move&quot; at all, just (at last) standing firm against a fractured Republican  majority without the will or means to strike a legislative  bargain.  What&#039;s a lame duck to do?  Wield the power of executive orders and back it up with the veto.  Powerful, but temporary in nature.

The US Government is going ballistic for two more  years.  I don&#039;t mean ballistic in the sense of all the Republican Kubuki theater: hyperbolic Fox friendly rhetoric, meaningless resolutions, lawsuits and endless investigations.  No, it&#039;s simply following a trajectory of governance completely determined by existing legislation.  The controls are locked, at least until the 2016 election, but probably long after that.  All Obama can really do is spin the capsule in pitch, roll and yaw.  Anybody remember the Right Stuff?  Good movie, great book.

Is this point when most Americans, Blue, Red and Purple realize that we can&#039;t govern ourselves anymore?  That our constitutional system produces something akin to the medical condition known as Parkinson&#039;s?

Dare I say it?  It&#039;s the Constitution stupid!  Or the stupid Constitution.  Ossification.  If this be heresy, let&#039;s make the most of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama's "move" seems to me more "inevitable" than "gutsy".... and not really a "move" at all, just (at last) standing firm against a fractured Republican  majority without the will or means to strike a legislative  bargain.  What's a lame duck to do?  Wield the power of executive orders and back it up with the veto.  Powerful, but temporary in nature.</p>
<p>The US Government is going ballistic for two more  years.  I don't mean ballistic in the sense of all the Republican Kubuki theater: hyperbolic Fox friendly rhetoric, meaningless resolutions, lawsuits and endless investigations.  No, it's simply following a trajectory of governance completely determined by existing legislation.  The controls are locked, at least until the 2016 election, but probably long after that.  All Obama can really do is spin the capsule in pitch, roll and yaw.  Anybody remember the Right Stuff?  Good movie, great book.</p>
<p>Is this point when most Americans, Blue, Red and Purple realize that we can't govern ourselves anymore?  That our constitutional system produces something akin to the medical condition known as Parkinson's?</p>
<p>Dare I say it?  It's the Constitution stupid!  Or the stupid Constitution.  Ossification.  If this be heresy, let's make the most of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54686</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54686</guid>
		<description>Enough with the &quot;Reagan and Bush did it!!&quot; meme..

It&#039;s utter felgercarp...

Reagan and Bush merely tweaked immigration legislation that had been recently passed...  The Simpson-Mazzoli Amnesty Law of 1986..

If Obama had done that, no one would be saying boo....  

So, let&#039;s stay with reality, eh??  :D

&lt;I&gt;&quot;This isn&#039;t the first time a president has been called &#039;king,&#039; and it certainly won&#039;t be the last. Americans as a whole have always disapproved of monarchy, going all the way back to when we overthrew one. Since then, it&#039;s been a common refrain for many presidents. Here is what we&#039;d call an editorial cartoon of Andrew Jackson, for example&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s funny that ya&#039;all don&#039;t DENY that Obama is making himself a king..  :D

The fact that you had to go back almost 200 years to find an example of a POTUS acting like a monarch should be a clue to ya&#039;all how bad Obama has acted...

If a GOP POTUS had done such actions and had screwed over the black community so bad, Left Wingers would be rioting in the streets...

We all know this is a fact...

But, if a Dem POTUS does such actions and badly screws over the black community, it&#039;s no big deal...  :^/

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough with the "Reagan and Bush did it!!" meme..</p>
<p>It's utter felgercarp...</p>
<p>Reagan and Bush merely tweaked immigration legislation that had been recently passed...  The Simpson-Mazzoli Amnesty Law of 1986..</p>
<p>If Obama had done that, no one would be saying boo....  </p>
<p>So, let's stay with reality, eh??  :D</p>
<p><i>"This isn't the first time a president has been called 'king,' and it certainly won't be the last. Americans as a whole have always disapproved of monarchy, going all the way back to when we overthrew one. Since then, it's been a common refrain for many presidents. Here is what we'd call an editorial cartoon of Andrew Jackson, for example</i></p>
<p>It's funny that ya'all don't DENY that Obama is making himself a king..  :D</p>
<p>The fact that you had to go back almost 200 years to find an example of a POTUS acting like a monarch should be a clue to ya'all how bad Obama has acted...</p>
<p>If a GOP POTUS had done such actions and had screwed over the black community so bad, Left Wingers would be rioting in the streets...</p>
<p>We all know this is a fact...</p>
<p>But, if a Dem POTUS does such actions and badly screws over the black community, it's no big deal...  :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54683</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 02:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54683</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to know that the awards committee has a collective heart. :)

Sometimes, I can be a dog with a bone. Ahem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's nice to know that the awards committee has a collective heart. :)</p>
<p>Sometimes, I can be a dog with a bone. Ahem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54682</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54682</guid>
		<description>LizM -

Even if he had, we wouldn&#039;t do that to him on the week he had his birthday!

:-)

&quot;Happy Birthday, Mister Vice President...&quot;

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LizM -</p>
<p>Even if he had, we wouldn't do that to him on the week he had his birthday!</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>"Happy Birthday, Mister Vice President..."</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comment-54681</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 01:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967#comment-54681</guid>
		<description>Vice President Biden must have done SOMETHING to merit another MDDOTW award ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Biden must have done SOMETHING to merit another MDDOTW award ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
