<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting By Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 01:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/#comment-53716</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9780#comment-53716</guid>
		<description>Michale -

That is correct, but I think early stats are given out as to &quot;how many people registered from each party have returned their early ballots.&quot;  I am making this assumption because of the depth of information some people now seem to have about what is going on in the Iowa election.  Of course, these are state laws, so one state might be more forthcoming than another.  But in ALL states, the actual vote totals are never released before the polls close on election night.

In some places, where mail-in voting is small, these votes are often never even counted.

Here&#039;s a typical scenario:

State of West Dakota counts all in-person ballots cast on election day (from polling stations).  The count comes up:

Dem -- 435,698
GOP -- 578,230

Now, they know they have 88,571 mail-in (or &quot;absentee&quot;) ballots, in addition to these subtotals.  But that total number added to the Dem would not give him the victory... so they don&#039;t even bother counting them.  Only in the situation where the outcome could change (214,739 mail-ins outstanding, for instance) would they even bother to count them.

But of course, your state may vary.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale -</p>
<p>That is correct, but I think early stats are given out as to "how many people registered from each party have returned their early ballots."  I am making this assumption because of the depth of information some people now seem to have about what is going on in the Iowa election.  Of course, these are state laws, so one state might be more forthcoming than another.  But in ALL states, the actual vote totals are never released before the polls close on election night.</p>
<p>In some places, where mail-in voting is small, these votes are often never even counted.</p>
<p>Here's a typical scenario:</p>
<p>State of West Dakota counts all in-person ballots cast on election day (from polling stations).  The count comes up:</p>
<p>Dem -- 435,698<br />
GOP -- 578,230</p>
<p>Now, they know they have 88,571 mail-in (or "absentee") ballots, in addition to these subtotals.  But that total number added to the Dem would not give him the victory... so they don't even bother counting them.  Only in the situation where the outcome could change (214,739 mail-ins outstanding, for instance) would they even bother to count them.</p>
<p>But of course, your state may vary.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/#comment-53573</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 23:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9780#comment-53573</guid>
		<description>Question...

Is it safe to assume that the tallys of early voting/mail voting are not released until the end of Election Day???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question...</p>
<p>Is it safe to assume that the tallys of early voting/mail voting are not released until the end of Election Day???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/#comment-53565</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9780#comment-53565</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see it taken one step further to E-voting.  Something along the lines of double blind identity based encryption. 

http://www.computing.dcu.ie/wpapers/2009/0309.pdf

That said, I do like my ritual of early voting, the trip downtown, 2 quarters in the meter, 1/4 mile walk, 3 escalators to the basement.  Circle the numbers.  Reverse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd like to see it taken one step further to E-voting.  Something along the lines of double blind identity based encryption. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.computing.dcu.ie/wpapers/2009/0309.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.computing.dcu.ie/wpapers/2009/0309.pdf</a></p>
<p>That said, I do like my ritual of early voting, the trip downtown, 2 quarters in the meter, 1/4 mile walk, 3 escalators to the basement.  Circle the numbers.  Reverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senate Still Up For Grabs &#124; Omaha Sun Times</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/#comment-53539</link>
		<dc:creator>Senate Still Up For Grabs &#124; Omaha Sun Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9780#comment-53539</guid>
		<description>[...] is also an interesting state this time around, because of a big change in the way their citizens are voting this year. The race is close, and the Republican seems to have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is also an interesting state this time around, because of a big change in the way their citizens are voting this year. The race is close, and the Republican seems to have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senate Still Up For Grabs&#160;&#124;&#160;Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/#comment-53536</link>
		<dc:creator>Senate Still Up For Grabs&#160;&#124;&#160;Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9780#comment-53536</guid>
		<description>[...] Alaska remains a question mark.Colorado is also an interesting state this time around, because of a big change in the way their citizens are voting this year. The race is close, and the Republican seems to have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alaska remains a question mark.Colorado is also an interesting state this time around, because of a big change in the way their citizens are voting this year. The race is close, and the Republican seems to have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Senate Still Up For Grabs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/#comment-53530</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Senate Still Up For Grabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9780#comment-53530</guid>
		<description>[...] Voting By Mail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Voting By Mail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
