Comments on: Prosecutors Object To War On Weed http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/ Reality-based political commentary Sun, 14 Jun 2026 03:59:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52965 Michale Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:46:34 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52965 Sorry, CW.. mea culpa... Ya know it doesn't take much to take me off on a tangent.. :D Michale Sorry, CW.. mea culpa...

Ya know it doesn't take much to take me off on a tangent.. :D

Michale

]]> By: Chris Weigant http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52961 Chris Weigant Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:30:05 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52961 John From Censornati [3] - It's an old bug in the counter. It counts "trackbacks" as comments (which they aren't), and I've never been able to figure out how to separate the two. Sorry for the confusion. TheStig [19] - It's been revived! Sorry for the delay... As for the rest of the commentary... what HAVE you all been smoking? This was a War On Weed column, as I recall... Hmmph. -CW John From Censornati [3] -

It's an old bug in the counter. It counts "trackbacks" as comments (which they aren't), and I've never been able to figure out how to separate the two. Sorry for the confusion.

TheStig [19] -

It's been revived! Sorry for the delay...

As for the rest of the commentary... what HAVE you all been smoking? This was a War On Weed column, as I recall...

Hmmph.

-CW

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52932 Michale Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:05:15 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52932 Not one single computer model or prediction vis a vis Human Caused Global Warming has EVER been accurate.. NOT.... ONE.... SINGLE.... TIME..... When models and predictions of a theory has such a perfect NEVER RIGHT score, what's the most logical course of action?? Alter the theory to fit reality... But, because Human Caused Climate Change is a POLITICAL issue, the religious-esque fanatics try to alter reality to fit the theory.. And here we are... Michale Not one single computer model or prediction vis a vis Human Caused Global Warming has EVER been accurate..

NOT.... ONE.... SINGLE.... TIME.....

When models and predictions of a theory has such a perfect NEVER RIGHT score, what's the most logical course of action??

Alter the theory to fit reality...

But, because Human Caused Climate Change is a POLITICAL issue, the religious-esque fanatics try to alter reality to fit the theory..

And here we are...

Michale

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52931 Michale Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:59:45 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52931 <I>Excellent point. Almost certainly argued in mirror image by VIPs in both China and India.</I> Oh Donkey Balls... Do you HONESTLY believe that China really gives a rip roarin' ass what the US does or does not do in regards to Climate Change?? <I>It all comes to risk assessment filtered through science and politics. As a betting man and pessimist I'd put my money on dystopia....if I had a time machine so I could collect my winnings.</I> From where I sit, I see very little science and 99.999999% politics.. If it were true science then all the points that dispute Human Caused Global Warming (Yet There Hasn't Been Any For Decades) theory would be given as much weight as the science that supports the theory.. The simple fact is, the climate has been changing for billions of years. This is fact.. The climate will continue to change once humans have gone the way of the dodo... We could no more change climate than we could change the rotation of the planet.. Maybe in a couple hundred years.. Maybe.. But to think we could have an effect on climate in the here and now?? That's just human arrogance... Michale Excellent point. Almost certainly argued in mirror image by VIPs in both China and India.

Oh Donkey Balls...

Do you HONESTLY believe that China really gives a rip roarin' ass what the US does or does not do in regards to Climate Change??

It all comes to risk assessment filtered through science and politics. As a betting man and pessimist I'd put my money on dystopia....if I had a time machine so I could collect my winnings.

From where I sit, I see very little science and 99.999999% politics..

If it were true science then all the points that dispute Human Caused Global Warming (Yet There Hasn't Been Any For Decades) theory would be given as much weight as the science that supports the theory..

The simple fact is, the climate has been changing for billions of years.

This is fact..

The climate will continue to change once humans have gone the way of the dodo...

We could no more change climate than we could change the rotation of the planet..

Maybe in a couple hundred years.. Maybe..

But to think we could have an effect on climate in the here and now??

That's just human arrogance...

Michale

]]> By: TheStig http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52928 TheStig Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:18:06 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52928 CW- my reply to 12 and 13 has gone missing. Just thought I'd let you know. M - 17 "If the United States gave in and did EVERYTHING that the environmental loonies wanted us to do....... China would never go along.. India would NEVER go along. Excellent point. Almost certainly argued in mirror image by VIPs in both China and India. This is a case where all the major parties have to: have 1) some common belief structure and 2) agree to jump at the same time. Which is why agreement is so difficult to engineer within a country, let alone between different countries at different stages of economic development. Another problem is that getting a consensus involves so many distinct disciplines: science, risk assessment, economics, engineering and politics and even game theory to name a few. Side note for sci-fi fans: this gives some insights about the "Fermi Paradox" about why we haven't heard anything from advanced alien civilizations. Even if you believe that climate change is real, and will have significant negative impacts to your nations economy, you might be tempted to procrastinate and grow your standard of living a bit more. Less tempted if you believe that increased CO2 levels can't be reversed quickly. Than again, more so if you believe the problem can't solved - live it up now, and good luck to those stuck in the upcoming dystopia. We won't go extinct...probably. It all comes to risk assessment filtered through science and politics. As a betting man and pessimist I'd put my money on dystopia....if I had a time machine so I could collect my winnings. CW- my reply to 12 and 13 has gone missing. Just thought I'd let you know.

M - 17

"If the United States gave in and did EVERYTHING that the environmental loonies wanted us to do....... China would never go along.. India would NEVER go along.

Excellent point. Almost certainly argued in mirror image by VIPs in both China and India.

This is a case where all the major parties have to: have 1) some common belief structure and 2) agree to jump at the same time. Which is why agreement is so difficult to engineer within a country, let alone between different countries at different stages of economic development.

Another problem is that getting a consensus involves so many distinct disciplines: science, risk assessment, economics, engineering and politics and even game theory to name a few. Side note for sci-fi fans: this gives some insights about the "Fermi Paradox" about why we haven't heard anything from advanced alien civilizations.

Even if you believe that climate change is real, and will have significant negative impacts to your nations economy, you might be tempted to procrastinate and grow your standard of living a bit more. Less tempted if you believe that increased CO2 levels can't be reversed quickly. Than again, more so if you believe the problem can't solved - live it up now, and good luck to those stuck in the upcoming dystopia. We won't go extinct...probably.

It all comes to risk assessment filtered through science and politics. As a betting man and pessimist I'd put my money on dystopia....if I had a time machine so I could collect my winnings.

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52927 Michale Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:05:45 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52927 <I>I never hold typos against someone...especially if they are trying to right a repyl using a tbalet without a physical kybroad.</I> Touche... But, since I have you here, I would ask you to address one simple point.. If the United States gave in and did EVERYTHING that the environmental loonies wanted us to do. Every point, every action, every THING that the loonies wanted the US to do, the US did.. Guess what?? It won't mean a damn thing to Human Caused Global Warming (If There Really Is Such A Thing)... Because China would never go along.. India would NEVER go along... So, even if it were proven beyond ANY doubt, that humans are responsible for Climate Change, it won't mean diddley squat to the Chinese... So, why decimate the US economy if it will do absolutely no good whatsoever??? <B>"Can you explain this, Colonel?? The fact is, there was no transfer order. Santiago wasn't going anywhere. Isn't that right, Colonel"</B> -Tom Cruise, A FEW GOOD MEN :D Michale I never hold typos against someone...especially if they are trying to right a repyl using a tbalet without a physical kybroad.

Touche...

But, since I have you here, I would ask you to address one simple point..

If the United States gave in and did EVERYTHING that the environmental loonies wanted us to do. Every point, every action, every THING that the loonies wanted the US to do, the US did..

Guess what?? It won't mean a damn thing to Human Caused Global Warming (If There Really Is Such A Thing)...

Because China would never go along.. India would NEVER go along...

So, even if it were proven beyond ANY doubt, that humans are responsible for Climate Change, it won't mean diddley squat to the Chinese...

So, why decimate the US economy if it will do absolutely no good whatsoever???

"Can you explain this, Colonel?? The fact is, there was no transfer order. Santiago wasn't going anywhere. Isn't that right, Colonel"
-Tom Cruise, A FEW GOOD MEN

:D

Michale

]]> By: TheStig http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52926 TheStig Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:32:04 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52926 M-12 I never hold typos against someone...especially if they are trying to right a repyl using a tbalet without a physical kybroad. M-12

I never hold typos against someone...especially if they are trying to right a repyl using a tbalet without a physical kybroad.

]]> By: TheStig http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52925 TheStig Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:48 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52925 M-12 You DO realize what would happen if all the CO2 on the planet was eliminated, right??? :D No, because I haven't a clue by what you mean by "eliminated" or "planet." By eliminated do you mean transported from the atmosphere to biosphere, hydrosphere or lithosphere? Or do you mean transformed into different chemicals but still in the atmosphere? Or both? Seriously, and with all due respect, you seem way, way way out of your league on this topic. M-13 "I could go on and on, but why bother??" I agree. Not a peer reviewed journal in the lot of 'em. "If I wanted smoke blown up my ass, I'd be at home with a pack of cigarettes and a short length of hose." - Detective Don Brodka, Try-N-Save security team. Cutting edge science is inherently elitist. Emerging schools of scientific thought get sorted out in peer reviewed journals, not in the popular press. Peer reviewed literature is tough going. You may have to travel to a library to read it. The text is turgid, terminology is often arcane, and there's lots of math, stats and graphs. It's punctuated with little numbers that need to be cross referenced against other peer reviewed sources. Even the best of the popular science reporting is minor league stuff. What you are citing is T-ball, or maybe scientific gossip is a better analogy. Neither is what you want to base an informed opinion upon. "It's impossible to talk people out of their religion..." Wow, that's going to really upset evangelists! Seriously, science and religion are philosophically very different. Religion stresses faith, revelation and sacred tradition. Science stresses reasoning, body of evidence and empiricism. Climate change science is firmly scientific, not religious. Science changes, and fairly rapidly. Religion schools of thought are much more conservative. M-12

You DO realize what would happen if all the CO2 on the planet was eliminated, right??? :D

No, because I haven't a clue by what you mean by "eliminated" or "planet." By eliminated do you mean transported from the atmosphere to biosphere, hydrosphere or lithosphere? Or do you mean transformed into different chemicals but still in the atmosphere? Or both? Seriously, and with all due respect, you seem way, way way out of your league on this topic.

M-13

"I could go on and on, but why bother??"

I agree. Not a peer reviewed journal in the lot of 'em.

"If I wanted smoke blown up my ass, I'd be at home with a pack of cigarettes and a short length of hose." - Detective Don Brodka, Try-N-Save security team.

Cutting edge science is inherently elitist. Emerging schools of scientific thought get sorted out in peer reviewed journals, not in the popular press. Peer reviewed literature is tough going. You may have to travel to a library to read it. The text is turgid, terminology is often arcane, and there's lots of math, stats and graphs. It's punctuated with little numbers that need to be cross referenced against other peer reviewed sources.

Even the best of the popular science reporting is minor league stuff. What you are citing is T-ball, or maybe scientific gossip is a better analogy. Neither is what you want to base an informed opinion upon.

"It's impossible to talk people out of their religion..."

Wow, that's going to really upset evangelists!

Seriously, science and religion are philosophically very different. Religion stresses faith, revelation and sacred tradition. Science stresses reasoning, body of evidence and empiricism. Climate change science is firmly scientific, not religious.

Science changes, and fairly rapidly. Religion schools of thought are much more conservative.

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52914 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:46:26 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52914 An advocate of the HUMAN CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING (But there ain't any relative warming) "debunking" the science that calls the theory into question.. WOW.. What are the odds.. Iddn't it funny how you are only interested in the debunking that supports your agenda.. Regardless, the simple fact is, those scientists back in the 70s were wrong.. What makes you think the scientists today are any different?? 50 years from now, it's entirely likely that the scientists of today will be ridiculed just as people today ridicule the scientists of the 70s... This is when you come back with that totally BS claim that "97% of all scientists agree that humans are responsible for Climate Change"... Com'on... Be consistent at least.. :D Michale An advocate of the HUMAN CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING (But there ain't any relative warming) "debunking" the science that calls the theory into question..

WOW.. What are the odds..

Iddn't it funny how you are only interested in the debunking that supports your agenda..

Regardless, the simple fact is, those scientists back in the 70s were wrong..

What makes you think the scientists today are any different??

50 years from now, it's entirely likely that the scientists of today will be ridiculed just as people today ridicule the scientists of the 70s...

This is when you come back with that totally BS claim that "97% of all scientists agree that humans are responsible for Climate Change"...

Com'on... Be consistent at least.. :D

Michale

]]> By: BashiBazouk http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52910 BashiBazouk Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:15:34 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52910 <i>I could go on and on, but why bother??</i> What? Your mouse finger got tired in the middle of your cut and paste job? <a href="http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1" rel="nofollow"> Here [American Meteorological Society] </a> is a thorough debunking of your cooling consensus BS. Warming papers of the time out numbered cooling papers about 6 to 1... I could go on and on, but why bother??

What? Your mouse finger got tired in the middle of your cut and paste job?

Here [American Meteorological Society] is a thorough debunking of your cooling consensus BS. Warming papers of the time out numbered cooling papers about 6 to 1...

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52906 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:37:14 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52906 http://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-pacific-warming-20140923-story.html <B>THE CLIMATE IS CHANGING - WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE! The scientific consensus says so - here are all my sources: 1970 - Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age - Scientists See Ice Age In the Future (The Washington Post, January 11, 1970) 1970 - Is Mankind Manufacturing a New Ice Age for Itself? (L.A. Times, January 15, 1970) 1970 - New Ice Age May Descend On Man (Sumter Daily Item, January 26, 1970) 1970 - Pollution Prospect A Chilling One (Owosso Argus-Press, January 26, 1970) 1970 - Pollution's 2-way 'Freeze' On Society (Middlesboro Daily News, January 28, 1970) 1970 - Cold Facts About Pollution (The Southeast Missourian, January 29, 1970) 1970 - Pollution Could Cause Ice Age, Agency Reports (St. Petersburg Times, March 4, 1970) 1970 - Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century (Boston Globe, April 16, 1970) 1970 - Pollution Called Ice Age Threat (St. Petersburg Times, June 26, 1970) 1970 - Dirt Will Bring New Ice Age (The Sydney Morning Herald, October 19, 1970) 1971 - Ice Age Refugee Dies Underground (The Montreal Gazette, Febuary 17, 1971) 1971 - Pollution Might Lead To Another Ice Age (Schenectady Gazette, March 22, 1971) 1971 - Pollution May Bring Ice Age - Scientist Rites Risk (The Windsor Star, March 23, 1971) 1971 - U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming (The Washington Post, July 9, 1971) 1971 - Ice Age Around the Corner (Chicago Tribune, July 10, 1971) 1971 - New Ice Age Coming - It's Already Getting Colder (L.A. Times, October 24, 1971) 1971 - Another Ice Age? Pollution Blocking Sunlight (The Day, November 1, 1971) 1971 - Air Pollution Could Bring An Ice Age (Harlan Daily Enterprise, November 4, 1971) 1972 - Air pollution may cause ice age (Free-Lance Star, February 3, 1972) 1972 - Scientist Says New ice Age Coming (The Ledger, February 13, 1972) 1972 - Ice Age Cometh For Dicey Times (The Sun, May 29, 1972) 1972 - There's a new Ice Age coming! (The Windsor Star, September 9, 1972) 1972 - Scientist predicts new ice age (Free-Lance Star, September 11, 1972) 1972 - British Expert on Climate Change Says New Ice Age Creeping Over Northern Hemisphere (Lewiston Evening Journal, September 11, 1972) 1972 - Climate Seen Cooling For Return Of Ice Age (Portsmouth Times, ?September 11, 1972?) 1972 - New Ice Age Slipping Over North (Press-Courier, September 11, 1972) 1972 - Ice Age Begins A New Assault In North (The Age, September 12, 1972) 1972 - Weather To Get Colder (Montreal Gazette, ?September 12, 1972?) 1972 - British climate expert predicts new Ice Age (The Christian Science Monitor, September 23, 1972) 1972 - Scientist Sees Chilling Signs of New Ice Age (L.A. Times, September 24, 1972) 1972 - Science: Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, November 13, 1972) 1972 - Geologist at Case Traces Long Winters - Sees Ice Age in 20 Years (Youngstown Vindicator, December 13, 1972) 1972 - Ice Age On Its Way, Scientist Says (Toledo Blade, December 13, 1972) 1972 - Ice Age Predicted In About 200 Years (The Portsmouth Times, December 14, 1972)</B> I could go on and on, but why bother?? It's impossible to talk people out of their religion... Michale http://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-pacific-warming-20140923-story.html
THE CLIMATE IS CHANGING - WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!

The scientific consensus says so - here are all my sources:

1970 - Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age - Scientists See Ice Age In the Future (The Washington Post, January 11, 1970)

1970 - Is Mankind Manufacturing a New Ice Age for Itself? (L.A. Times, January 15, 1970)

1970 - New Ice Age May Descend On Man (Sumter Daily Item, January 26, 1970)

1970 - Pollution Prospect A Chilling One (Owosso Argus-Press, January 26, 1970)

1970 - Pollution's 2-way 'Freeze' On Society (Middlesboro Daily News, January 28, 1970)

1970 - Cold Facts About Pollution (The Southeast Missourian, January 29, 1970)

1970 - Pollution Could Cause Ice Age, Agency Reports (St. Petersburg Times, March 4, 1970)

1970 - Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century (Boston Globe, April 16, 1970)

1970 - Pollution Called Ice Age Threat (St. Petersburg Times, June 26, 1970)

1970 - Dirt Will Bring New Ice Age (The Sydney Morning Herald, October 19, 1970)

1971 - Ice Age Refugee Dies Underground (The Montreal Gazette, Febuary 17, 1971)

1971 - Pollution Might Lead To Another Ice Age (Schenectady Gazette, March 22, 1971)

1971 - Pollution May Bring Ice Age - Scientist Rites Risk (The Windsor Star, March 23, 1971)

1971 - U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming (The Washington Post, July 9, 1971)

1971 - Ice Age Around the Corner (Chicago Tribune, July 10, 1971)

1971 - New Ice Age Coming - It's Already Getting Colder (L.A. Times, October 24, 1971)

1971 - Another Ice Age? Pollution Blocking Sunlight (The Day, November 1, 1971)

1971 - Air Pollution Could Bring An Ice Age (Harlan Daily Enterprise, November 4, 1971)

1972 - Air pollution may cause ice age (Free-Lance Star, February 3, 1972)

1972 - Scientist Says New ice Age Coming (The Ledger, February 13, 1972)

1972 - Ice Age Cometh For Dicey Times (The Sun, May 29, 1972)

1972 - There's a new Ice Age coming! (The Windsor Star, September 9, 1972)

1972 - Scientist predicts new ice age (Free-Lance Star, September 11, 1972)

1972 - British Expert on Climate Change Says New Ice Age Creeping Over Northern Hemisphere (Lewiston Evening Journal, September 11, 1972)

1972 - Climate Seen Cooling For Return Of Ice Age (Portsmouth Times, ?September 11, 1972?)

1972 - New Ice Age Slipping Over North (Press-Courier, September 11, 1972)

1972 - Ice Age Begins A New Assault In North (The Age, September 12, 1972)

1972 - Weather To Get Colder (Montreal Gazette, ?September 12, 1972?)

1972 - British climate expert predicts new Ice Age (The Christian Science Monitor, September 23, 1972)

1972 - Scientist Sees Chilling Signs of New Ice Age (L.A. Times, September 24, 1972)

1972 - Science: Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, November 13, 1972)

1972 - Geologist at Case Traces Long Winters - Sees Ice Age in 20 Years (Youngstown Vindicator, December 13, 1972)

1972 - Ice Age On Its Way, Scientist Says (Toledo Blade, December 13, 1972)

1972 - Ice Age Predicted In About 200 Years (The Portsmouth Times, December 14, 1972)

I could go on and on, but why bother??

It's impossible to talk people out of their religion...

Michale

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52903 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:21:40 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52903 <I>What's YOUR guesstimate? From the fossil fuel reservoir, and compared to what other activities they might have engaged in on a comparable day?</I> I am referring to all the fuel that was expended by private planes, private automobiles, limos and all the other modes of transport used by celebritities and politicians and every day joes to attend the event.. It's like Al Gore traveling around the world in his private planes and convoys of large SUVs, lecturing everyone about THEIR carbon footprint.. You DO realize what would happen if all the CO2 on the planet was eliminated, right??? :D This is where you throw out that total BS statement about 97% of scientists agreeing that humans cause Climate Change... :D Go on.. I dare ya.. I double dog dare ya... :D <I>Considering the above, be careful about casually throwing the term moron about..</I> Yea, I noticed the typo... Mea Culpa... :D Michale What's YOUR guesstimate? From the fossil fuel reservoir, and compared to what other activities they might have engaged in on a comparable day?

I am referring to all the fuel that was expended by private planes, private automobiles, limos and all the other modes of transport used by celebritities and politicians and every day joes to attend the event..

It's like Al Gore traveling around the world in his private planes and convoys of large SUVs, lecturing everyone about THEIR carbon footprint..

You DO realize what would happen if all the CO2 on the planet was eliminated, right??? :D

This is where you throw out that total BS statement about 97% of scientists agreeing that humans cause Climate Change... :D

Go on.. I dare ya.. I double dog dare ya... :D

Considering the above, be careful about casually throwing the term moron about..

Yea, I noticed the typo... Mea Culpa... :D

Michale

]]> By: TheStig http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52899 TheStig Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:43:14 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52899 "Wonder how many thousands of tons of carbon was dumped in the air by these moronic hypocrites for their Climate Change parade???" What's YOUR guesstimate? From the fossil fuel reservoir, and compared to what other activities they might have engaged in on a comparable day? Answer those questions and you're making a useful point, otherwise it's just diversionary snark. Considering the above, be careful about casually throwing the term moron about.. "Wonder how many thousands of tons of carbon was dumped in the air by these moronic hypocrites for their Climate Change parade???"

What's YOUR guesstimate? From the fossil fuel reservoir, and compared to what other activities they might have engaged in on a comparable day?

Answer those questions and you're making a useful point, otherwise it's just diversionary snark. Considering the above, be careful about casually throwing the term moron about..

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52895 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:04:50 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52895 https://twitter.com/ClimateNewsCA/status/513768720712605696 Yea... They REALLY care about the planet... Wonder how many thousands of tons of carbon was dumped in the air by these moronic hypocrites for their Climate Change parade??? Climate Change Parade.... How utterly stoopid.. What's next??? Earth Rotation Parade??? Sun Rises In The East Parade??? Sun Rises In The West Parade??? Morons... Michale https://twitter.com/ClimateNewsCA/status/513768720712605696

Yea... They REALLY care about the planet...

Wonder how many thousands of tons of carbon was dumped in the air by these moronic hypocrites for their Climate Change parade???

Climate Change Parade.... How utterly stoopid..

What's next???

Earth Rotation Parade???

Sun Rises In The East Parade???

Sun Rises In The West Parade???

Morons...

Michale

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52894 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:56:16 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52894 Looks like Obama is invading Syria now... And of course, the Anti-War Hysterical Left is out in full force, protesting again.... Oh wait... They're not.... Funny how that is, iddn't it?? :D Michale Looks like Obama is invading Syria now...

And of course, the Anti-War Hysterical Left is out in full force, protesting again....

Oh wait... They're not....

Funny how that is, iddn't it?? :D

Michale

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52893 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:54:50 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52893 <I>Real leaders blame Obama.</I> No.. REAL leaders TAKE the blame, TAKE responsibility... <I>BTW, where was that liberal media on the climate change march? If 300,000 conservatives marched for anything they'd declare it the rapture.</I> Well, I DID read something about it.. About how all these EARTH FIRST morons were a bunch of slobs and left a buttload of litter and crap all around... Hypocrites... Who knew that GREENs actually don't give a rat's ass about the planet, eh?? :D Michale Real leaders blame Obama.

No.. REAL leaders TAKE the blame, TAKE responsibility...

BTW, where was that liberal media on the climate change march? If 300,000 conservatives marched for anything they'd declare it the rapture.

Well, I DID read something about it..

About how all these EARTH FIRST morons were a bunch of slobs and left a buttload of litter and crap all around...

Hypocrites...

Who knew that GREENs actually don't give a rat's ass about the planet, eh?? :D

Michale

]]> By: akadjian http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52890 akadjian Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:14:42 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52890 Real leaders blame Obama. :) -David BTW, where was that liberal media on the climate change march? If 300,000 conservatives marched for anything they'd declare it the rapture. Real leaders blame Obama.

:)

-David

BTW, where was that liberal media on the climate change march? If 300,000 conservatives marched for anything they'd declare it the rapture.

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52886 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:54:31 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52886 <I>What's up with the comments* in Schrödinger’s box? The counter says 8, but I only see 4.</I> It's due to a peculiarity of tweets and twits.... When someone tweet's a commentary it counts it as a comment... ... or something like that.. Michale What's up with the comments* in Schrödinger’s box? The counter says 8, but I only see 4.

It's due to a peculiarity of tweets and twits.... When someone tweet's a commentary it counts it as a comment...

... or something like that..

Michale

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52885 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:51:51 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52885 <I>FTP suggestion for this week: It's Bush's fault.</I> Whatever Democrats have to tell themselves to look in a mirror and get up in the morning, I guess.... REAL leaders take responsibility for their frak-ups.. Lusers just blame someone else.. ANYONE else... Michale FTP suggestion for this week: It's Bush's fault.

Whatever Democrats have to tell themselves to look in a mirror and get up in the morning, I guess....

REAL leaders take responsibility for their frak-ups..

Lusers just blame someone else.. ANYONE else...

Michale

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52884 Michale Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:45:58 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52884 <I>It's easy to understand why the fuzz are resentful. Watching their racket crumble must be scary.</I> Did you honestly say "the fuzz"?? The 60s called... They have about a trillion brain cells that they say are yours.... Michale It's easy to understand why the fuzz are resentful. Watching their racket crumble must be scary.

Did you honestly say "the fuzz"??

The 60s called...

They have about a trillion brain cells that they say are yours....

Michale

]]> By: John From Censornati http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52878 John From Censornati Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:47:34 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52878 What's up with the comments* in Schrödinger’s box? The counter says 8, but I only see 4. * None of my breadcrumbs are missing. What's up with the comments* in Schrödinger’s box? The counter says 8, but I only see 4.

* None of my breadcrumbs are missing.

]]> By: John From Censornati http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52877 John From Censornati Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:30:02 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52877 "As Congress debated the escalation of airstrikes against Islamic extremists, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, digressed to inveigh against “the wholly unnecessary Bush-Cheney invasion of Iraq,” a bell that was rung 11 & 1/2 years ago and can’t be un-rung now." - Frank Bruni, NYT (lol btw) FTP suggestion for this week: It's Bush's fault. We must be like the GR on the Leftovers. The GOP wants to forget. We can't allow that to happen. "As Congress debated the escalation of airstrikes against Islamic extremists, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, digressed to inveigh against “the wholly unnecessary Bush-Cheney invasion of Iraq,” a bell that was rung 11 & 1/2 years ago and can’t be un-rung now." - Frank Bruni, NYT (lol btw)

FTP suggestion for this week: It's Bush's fault.

We must be like the GR on the Leftovers. The GOP wants to forget. We can't allow that to happen.

]]> By: John From Censornati http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comment-52875 John From Censornati Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:13:39 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684#comment-52875 It's easy to understand why the fuzz are resentful. Watching their racket crumble must be scary. It's easy to understand why the fuzz are resentful. Watching their racket crumble must be scary.

]]>