<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Poll Watch -- July, 2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51419</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51419</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The Case Against Obama&#039;s Nuclear OptionEven if reform is needed and legal, endowing the presidency with new, unilateral powers is a dangerous precedent.&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/the-case-against-obama-s-nuclear-option-20140807

Remember, my fellow Weigantians...

One reaps what one sows....

Don&#039;t say I didn&#039;t warn ya&#039;all....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The Case Against Obama's Nuclear OptionEven if reform is needed and legal, endowing the presidency with new, unilateral powers is a dangerous precedent.</b><br />
<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/the-case-against-obama-s-nuclear-option-20140807" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/the-case-against-obama-s-nuclear-option-20140807</a></p>
<p>Remember, my fellow Weigantians...</p>
<p>One reaps what one sows....</p>
<p>Don't say I didn't warn ya'all....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51417</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51417</guid>
		<description>And *I* am talking about Democrat (so-called) LEADERS who lied.

JFC is just talking about some Joe SixPack voter...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And *I* am talking about Democrat (so-called) LEADERS who lied.</p>
<p>JFC is just talking about some Joe SixPack voter...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51416</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51416</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Republican lies prevail again. They&#039;re shameless.&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;&quot;If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.  If you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Democrat lies prevailed again. They&#039;re shameless.

Isn&#039;t it funny how it works both ways??   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Republican lies prevail again. They're shameless.</i></p>
<p><b>"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.  If you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan"</b></p>
<p>Democrat lies prevailed again. They're shameless.</p>
<p>Isn't it funny how it works both ways??   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51414</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51414</guid>
		<description>&quot;He’s voted for Obamacare. In the Obamacare, gun control was attached, like an earmark. Anything that takes my Second Amendment rights away is a major blow.” - Tennessee Republican primary voter referring to Lamar Alexander

Republican lies prevail again. They&#039;re shameless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"He’s voted for Obamacare. In the Obamacare, gun control was attached, like an earmark. Anything that takes my Second Amendment rights away is a major blow.” - Tennessee Republican primary voter referring to Lamar Alexander</p>
<p>Republican lies prevail again. They're shameless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51410</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51410</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;How many of them decide to turn out, and how they break, is likely to determine who wins the few genuinely competitive races.&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly..

I have always said it...

Die Hard Wingers (on both the Right &amp; the Left) are superfluous in elections..  They will vote Party line regardless of ANYTHING else...

It&#039;s us Independents and NPAs who decide elections...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How many of them decide to turn out, and how they break, is likely to determine who wins the few genuinely competitive races.</i></p>
<p>Exactly..</p>
<p>I have always said it...</p>
<p>Die Hard Wingers (on both the Right &amp; the Left) are superfluous in elections..  They will vote Party line regardless of ANYTHING else...</p>
<p>It's us Independents and NPAs who decide elections...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51405</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51405</guid>
		<description>M (20)

&quot;Would you agree that Obama&#039;s sinking poll numbers will have a depressing effect on the Dem turnout this mid-term??&quot;

Not much impact on Democrats, and I don&#039;t think sinking Republican numbers will affect them much either. Independents are another matter.  How many of them decide to turn out, and how they break, is likely to determine who wins the few genuinely competitive races.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M (20)</p>
<p>"Would you agree that Obama's sinking poll numbers will have a depressing effect on the Dem turnout this mid-term??"</p>
<p>Not much impact on Democrats, and I don't think sinking Republican numbers will affect them much either. Independents are another matter.  How many of them decide to turn out, and how they break, is likely to determine who wins the few genuinely competitive races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51398</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51398</guid>
		<description>Hilariously, Sam Brownback blames his own unpopularity on Barack Obama!

“I think a big part of it is Barack Obama” 

Apparently, Kansans are unable to tell the two apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilariously, Sam Brownback blames his own unpopularity on Barack Obama!</p>
<p>“I think a big part of it is Barack Obama” </p>
<p>Apparently, Kansans are unable to tell the two apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51394</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51394</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Sort of in response to M (9), but also relevant to some recent CW topics about upcoming Senate races and not-so-good Obama popularity.&lt;/I&gt;

Would you agree that Obama&#039;s sinking poll numbers will have a depressing effect on the Dem turnout this mid-term??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sort of in response to M (9), but also relevant to some recent CW topics about upcoming Senate races and not-so-good Obama popularity.</i></p>
<p>Would you agree that Obama's sinking poll numbers will have a depressing effect on the Dem turnout this mid-term??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51392</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51392</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;So what kind of Senate raceway is it going to be this year: national issues or local issues? I&#039;m still betting, Republicans would do best to make the election as local as possible...focus on state issues! And yet, Republicans seem to be hammering on national hot button issues like Immigration, Benghazi, Health Care..... According to the model, this amounts to trading a 20% lead for a dead heat? Why would they do this? Maybe that&#039;s what&#039;s bugging the Republican establishment types!&lt;/I&gt;

I know I can be an arrogant and sarcastic ass, but this is not one of those times..  :D

It&#039;s possible (probable) that Republicans know something we don&#039;t with regards to the current crop of scandals..  Something along the lines of what revelations are coming down the pipe...

Given that assumption (and yes, I know.  It&#039;s ONLY an assumption) having the GOP keep those scandals on the front page makes sense...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So what kind of Senate raceway is it going to be this year: national issues or local issues? I'm still betting, Republicans would do best to make the election as local as possible...focus on state issues! And yet, Republicans seem to be hammering on national hot button issues like Immigration, Benghazi, Health Care..... According to the model, this amounts to trading a 20% lead for a dead heat? Why would they do this? Maybe that's what's bugging the Republican establishment types!</i></p>
<p>I know I can be an arrogant and sarcastic ass, but this is not one of those times..  :D</p>
<p>It's possible (probable) that Republicans know something we don't with regards to the current crop of scandals..  Something along the lines of what revelations are coming down the pipe...</p>
<p>Given that assumption (and yes, I know.  It's ONLY an assumption) having the GOP keep those scandals on the front page makes sense...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51391</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51391</guid>
		<description>Sort of in response to M (9), but also relevant to some recent CW topics about upcoming Senate races and not-so-good Obama popularity.

On Aug 4th, fivethirtyeight.com posted 60/40 odds of  a Republican Senate takeover (net gain of 6 seats or more).  This got some media attention!  

As I&#039;ve noted before, assumptions about the importance of national vs state variance play an important role in the ultimate odds assigned to each side controlling the Senate.  I&#039;ve run the 538 state by state odds through a Monte Carlo simulation that examines this question.  

To get the odds of a Republican takeover up to 538&#039;s 60%, I had assign all the random variance to local factors.  That results in a 59% chance of a Republican takeover, as near as perfect agreement with 538 as you can expect in this kind of simulation.

Interesting, but in the 2012 elections, the best fit with 538 Models was obtained assuming nearly all variance was assigned to a single National Random factor. Also the best fit with various &quot;prediction markets.&quot; What has changed since 2012? I&#039;m frankly skeptical anything has.  Is Silver just being conservative?  Is it a better meme to keep 538 in the news, and people clicking on his site? Naw, that COULDN&#039;T BE!

Anyway, running my model with the historically based assumption of a 100% national variance component and the same 36 state by state probabilities drops the odds of a Republican takeover to 49.9%. By, the way, intermediate allocations between national and state variance give essentially straight line intermediate results.

So what kind of Senate raceway is it going to be this year: national issues or local issues?  I&#039;m still betting, Republicans would do best to make the election as local as possible...focus on state issues!  And yet, Republicans seem to be hammering on national hot button issues like Immigration, Benghazi, Health Care..... According to the model, this amounts to trading a 20% lead for a dead heat?  Why would they do this? Maybe that&#039;s what&#039;s bugging the Republican establishment types!

I know, it&#039;s a model, but models can raise some interesting questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of in response to M (9), but also relevant to some recent CW topics about upcoming Senate races and not-so-good Obama popularity.</p>
<p>On Aug 4th, fivethirtyeight.com posted 60/40 odds of  a Republican Senate takeover (net gain of 6 seats or more).  This got some media attention!  </p>
<p>As I've noted before, assumptions about the importance of national vs state variance play an important role in the ultimate odds assigned to each side controlling the Senate.  I've run the 538 state by state odds through a Monte Carlo simulation that examines this question.  </p>
<p>To get the odds of a Republican takeover up to 538's 60%, I had assign all the random variance to local factors.  That results in a 59% chance of a Republican takeover, as near as perfect agreement with 538 as you can expect in this kind of simulation.</p>
<p>Interesting, but in the 2012 elections, the best fit with 538 Models was obtained assuming nearly all variance was assigned to a single National Random factor. Also the best fit with various "prediction markets." What has changed since 2012? I'm frankly skeptical anything has.  Is Silver just being conservative?  Is it a better meme to keep 538 in the news, and people clicking on his site? Naw, that COULDN'T BE!</p>
<p>Anyway, running my model with the historically based assumption of a 100% national variance component and the same 36 state by state probabilities drops the odds of a Republican takeover to 49.9%. By, the way, intermediate allocations between national and state variance give essentially straight line intermediate results.</p>
<p>So what kind of Senate raceway is it going to be this year: national issues or local issues?  I'm still betting, Republicans would do best to make the election as local as possible...focus on state issues!  And yet, Republicans seem to be hammering on national hot button issues like Immigration, Benghazi, Health Care..... According to the model, this amounts to trading a 20% lead for a dead heat?  Why would they do this? Maybe that's what's bugging the Republican establishment types!</p>
<p>I know, it's a model, but models can raise some interesting questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51382</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51382</guid>
		<description>Thanx ya, Oh mighty Poobah   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx ya, Oh mighty Poobah   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51378</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 23:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51378</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;The American people don&#039;t want me just standing around twiddling my thumbs and waiting for Congress to get something done.&quot; 
-Barack Obama&lt;/B&gt;

Mr President.  If it&#039;s a choice between you standing around and twiddling your thumbs and doing things that actually HURT and HARM this country??

Yes...

The American people would prefer that you stand around doing nothing but twiddling your thumbs....

The fact that you refuse to see this is why your approval rating is underwater and sinking..

Sir....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"The American people don't want me just standing around twiddling my thumbs and waiting for Congress to get something done."<br />
-Barack Obama</b></p>
<p>Mr President.  If it's a choice between you standing around and twiddling your thumbs and doing things that actually HURT and HARM this country??</p>
<p>Yes...</p>
<p>The American people would prefer that you stand around doing nothing but twiddling your thumbs....</p>
<p>The fact that you refuse to see this is why your approval rating is underwater and sinking..</p>
<p>Sir....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51376</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 20:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51376</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s already dropped .3 points, just in the past week...

I tell ya, this might be it!!!  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama's already dropped .3 points, just in the past week...</p>
<p>I tell ya, this might be it!!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51368</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51368</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Still waiting for your prediction of sub-40 to come true, I might add...&lt;/I&gt;

Wait til next month when school starts and classes that are already busting at the seams will burst..

Schools that are already struggling to make ends meet are going to be financially wiped out...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Still waiting for your prediction of sub-40 to come true, I might add...</i></p>
<p>Wait til next month when school starts and classes that are already busting at the seams will burst..</p>
<p>Schools that are already struggling to make ends meet are going to be financially wiped out...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51367</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51367</guid>
		<description>But I must have got you all riled up for you to go on your crazy chat-bot binge again..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I must have got you all riled up for you to go on your crazy chat-bot binge again..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51366</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51366</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It’s also pointless to ask a chatbot if it’s a chatbot. It will always say that it is not.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s also useless to ask a crazy person if they are crazy..  They will always claim that they are not crazy, that it&#039;s everyone else who is crazy..

But, once again, I commend you on your demonization...

Goebbels would be so proud of you...

It&#039;s much easier to simply attack people than it is to have a thoughtful and meaningful discussion...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s also pointless to ask a chatbot if it’s a chatbot. It will always say that it is not.</i></p>
<p>It's also useless to ask a crazy person if they are crazy..  They will always claim that they are not crazy, that it's everyone else who is crazy..</p>
<p>But, once again, I commend you on your demonization...</p>
<p>Goebbels would be so proud of you...</p>
<p>It's much easier to simply attack people than it is to have a thoughtful and meaningful discussion...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51362</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51362</guid>
		<description>A chatbot is a computer program designed to simulate conversation with one or more human users. The purpose of that simulation is to fool the human user into believing that the chatbot&#039;s output has been produced by a human. Some chatbots use sophisticated natural language processing systems, but most of the chatbots deployed by the Republican noise machine are “simple-minded” and minimally scan for keywords and return a reply from a textual database.
 
For example, the keyword “Obama” will result in an unhinged-from-reality Republican talking-point word salad every time. If a human user responds *, the chatbot will lead its victim down the cancervative rabbit hole with an onslaught of circular logic, dehumanizing slurs, half-truisms, bizarre claims of false equivalence or nonpartisanship, projection, links to right-wing cult publications, and misleading out-of-context quotes. The primary goals of the chatbot’s programmer are to derail thoughtful adult conversation regarding important issues and to normalize Republican thought disorders.

* Responding is not recommended. Some chatbots are extremely needy and replying will simply stimulate the chatbot to generate additional meaningless redundant clutter. It’s also pointless to ask a chatbot if it’s a chatbot. It will always say that it is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A chatbot is a computer program designed to simulate conversation with one or more human users. The purpose of that simulation is to fool the human user into believing that the chatbot's output has been produced by a human. Some chatbots use sophisticated natural language processing systems, but most of the chatbots deployed by the Republican noise machine are “simple-minded” and minimally scan for keywords and return a reply from a textual database.</p>
<p>For example, the keyword “Obama” will result in an unhinged-from-reality Republican talking-point word salad every time. If a human user responds *, the chatbot will lead its victim down the cancervative rabbit hole with an onslaught of circular logic, dehumanizing slurs, half-truisms, bizarre claims of false equivalence or nonpartisanship, projection, links to right-wing cult publications, and misleading out-of-context quotes. The primary goals of the chatbot’s programmer are to derail thoughtful adult conversation regarding important issues and to normalize Republican thought disorders.</p>
<p>* Responding is not recommended. Some chatbots are extremely needy and replying will simply stimulate the chatbot to generate additional meaningless redundant clutter. It’s also pointless to ask a chatbot if it’s a chatbot. It will always say that it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51361</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51361</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Chris, I&#039;m sorry you have to deal with so many malevolent Republicans.&lt;/I&gt;

Actually, those types have more in common with Democrats than with Republicans..

Republicans want to wipe those people from existence..

Democrats want to give them a free ride..

But don&#039;t let things like reality and facts stop you from your fantasies...

It&#039;s uplifting (in a sad sort of way) to see a person who can ignore reality and live in their own fantasy world...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Chris, I'm sorry you have to deal with so many malevolent Republicans.</i></p>
<p>Actually, those types have more in common with Democrats than with Republicans..</p>
<p>Republicans want to wipe those people from existence..</p>
<p>Democrats want to give them a free ride..</p>
<p>But don't let things like reality and facts stop you from your fantasies...</p>
<p>It's uplifting (in a sad sort of way) to see a person who can ignore reality and live in their own fantasy world...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51360</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51360</guid>
		<description>TS,

&lt;I&gt;I doubt many sitting politicians are above water at this time. The natives (AKA We the People) are restless.&lt;/I&gt;

And THEN some....

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/americas-fed-obama-approval-rating-hits-all-time-low-poll-n173271

Now matter how ya&#039;all try to paint things, Joe &amp; Jane SixPack are NOT happy with their government and their leaders...

It&#039;s that simple...

And, if ALL ya&#039;all got is &quot;Well, they hate Republicans worse than they hate Democrats&quot;  or  &quot;They hate Congress worse than they hate Obama&quot;.....

Well, THAT is pretty sad...

Wouldn&#039;t you agree??

Like I said above, no one will admit that Obama has failed as they leader we ALL expected when we elected him back in 2008....

Ya&#039;all just CAN&#039;T admit it..

I, however, can... Easily...

I really frak&#039;ed up by voting for Obama...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TS,</p>
<p><i>I doubt many sitting politicians are above water at this time. The natives (AKA We the People) are restless.</i></p>
<p>And THEN some....</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/americas-fed-obama-approval-rating-hits-all-time-low-poll-n173271" rel="nofollow">http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/americas-fed-obama-approval-rating-hits-all-time-low-poll-n173271</a></p>
<p>Now matter how ya'all try to paint things, Joe &amp; Jane SixPack are NOT happy with their government and their leaders...</p>
<p>It's that simple...</p>
<p>And, if ALL ya'all got is "Well, they hate Republicans worse than they hate Democrats"  or  "They hate Congress worse than they hate Obama".....</p>
<p>Well, THAT is pretty sad...</p>
<p>Wouldn't you agree??</p>
<p>Like I said above, no one will admit that Obama has failed as they leader we ALL expected when we elected him back in 2008....</p>
<p>Ya'all just CAN'T admit it..</p>
<p>I, however, can... Easily...</p>
<p>I really frak'ed up by voting for Obama...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51358</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51358</guid>
		<description>Chris, I&#039;m sorry you have to deal with so many malevolent Republicans.

The rEVOLution will be spammed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I'm sorry you have to deal with so many malevolent Republicans.</p>
<p>The rEVOLution will be spammed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51356</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51356</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Obama&#039;s numbers look bad... until you look at Boehner&#039;s... or McConnell&#039;s... or the Republican Party in general...&lt;/I&gt;

How sad is it for Obama that his ONLY claim is, &quot;Yea, I might be bad, but they are worse.&quot;  
:D

We usually expect more from our POTUS...

What a drop in expectations since the 2008 election, eh??

For ALL of us...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Obama's numbers look bad... until you look at Boehner's... or McConnell's... or the Republican Party in general...</i></p>
<p>How sad is it for Obama that his ONLY claim is, "Yea, I might be bad, but they are worse."<br />
:D</p>
<p>We usually expect more from our POTUS...</p>
<p>What a drop in expectations since the 2008 election, eh??</p>
<p>For ALL of us...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51354</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51354</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Still waiting for your prediction of sub-40 to come true, I might add...&lt;/I&gt;

You and me both... You and me both..  :D

&lt;I&gt;Anyway, this has been a long time coming (the problem has gotten worse and worse, until it got so bad that HUNDREDS of bogus users appeared DAILY), so I&#039;m pretty happy I seem to have at least partially solved the problem. But it was indeed time consuming, which is possibly why I&#039;ve been a bit inattentive for the past week or so, while writing new code.&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s to your credit that none of us has noticed..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Still waiting for your prediction of sub-40 to come true, I might add...</i></p>
<p>You and me both... You and me both..  :D</p>
<p><i>Anyway, this has been a long time coming (the problem has gotten worse and worse, until it got so bad that HUNDREDS of bogus users appeared DAILY), so I'm pretty happy I seem to have at least partially solved the problem. But it was indeed time consuming, which is possibly why I've been a bit inattentive for the past week or so, while writing new code.</i></p>
<p>It's to your credit that none of us has noticed..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51352</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 06:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51352</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;General comment:&lt;/strong&gt;

OK, today&#039;s article was a bit short, but in my own defense, I have been working on two separate projects behind the scenes here at CW.com.

The first is an article I hope to present tomorrow, which will spotlight the international reach of CW.com Enterprises (hopefully tomorrow, but may have to punt until next Monday, just to leave myself an &quot;out&quot;), which I&#039;m sure you&#039;re all  going to enjoy.

The second is a nuts-and-bolts thing, which is completely invisible to all current (registered) users of the site.  I&#039;ve been getting flooded with spammy new users at the site (to the tune of HUNDREDS per day), and so I had to hack the WordPress code to filter at least some of it out automatically.  This is really bitchy work, as any programmer can tell you, but I think I&#039;ve got it working correctly now.

To all of you, this change will be completely invisible.  Nobody currently registered will notice the slightest change.  But new registrations are now going to be filtered against a &quot;blacklist&quot; of banned sites.  

If this causes problems for new users, I apologize in advance, but I don&#039;t really know what to tell anyone who can&#039;t successfully register.  Get a new public email address -- that&#039;s all I can really say -- one from a company that doesn&#039;t allow millions of spammers to operate!

Anyway, this has been a long time coming (the problem has gotten worse and worse, until it got so bad that HUNDREDS of bogus users appeared DAILY), so I&#039;m pretty happy I seem to have at least partially solved the problem.  But it was indeed time consuming, which is possibly why I&#039;ve been a bit inattentive for the past week or so, while writing new code.

The good news is this period is now over... so we should return to normal here.

&lt;/strong&gt;-CW&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>General comment:</strong></p>
<p>OK, today's article was a bit short, but in my own defense, I have been working on two separate projects behind the scenes here at CW.com.</p>
<p>The first is an article I hope to present tomorrow, which will spotlight the international reach of CW.com Enterprises (hopefully tomorrow, but may have to punt until next Monday, just to leave myself an "out"), which I'm sure you're all  going to enjoy.</p>
<p>The second is a nuts-and-bolts thing, which is completely invisible to all current (registered) users of the site.  I've been getting flooded with spammy new users at the site (to the tune of HUNDREDS per day), and so I had to hack the WordPress code to filter at least some of it out automatically.  This is really bitchy work, as any programmer can tell you, but I think I've got it working correctly now.</p>
<p>To all of you, this change will be completely invisible.  Nobody currently registered will notice the slightest change.  But new registrations are now going to be filtered against a "blacklist" of banned sites.  </p>
<p>If this causes problems for new users, I apologize in advance, but I don't really know what to tell anyone who can't successfully register.  Get a new public email address -- that's all I can really say -- one from a company that doesn't allow millions of spammers to operate!</p>
<p>Anyway, this has been a long time coming (the problem has gotten worse and worse, until it got so bad that HUNDREDS of bogus users appeared DAILY), so I'm pretty happy I seem to have at least partially solved the problem.  But it was indeed time consuming, which is possibly why I've been a bit inattentive for the past week or so, while writing new code.</p>
<p>The good news is this period is now over... so we should return to normal here.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51351</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 06:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51351</guid>
		<description>Michale -

Heh.

Still waiting for your prediction of sub-40 to come true, I might add...

But you&#039;re right, it was mostly a plateau month for Obama, on average.

Obama&#039;s numbers look bad... until you look at Boehner&#039;s... or McConnell&#039;s... or the Republican Party in general...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/08/05/a-majority-of-people-dont-like-their-own-congressman-for-the-first-time-ever/

and...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/05/morning-plum-gop-in-doghouse-among-women-nonwhites-young/

From that last one:

&lt;em&gt;But the relative ratings of the Republican and Democratic parties are also noteworthy, particularly among key voter groups that GOP leaders have been hoping to improve their appeal among ever since the 2012 loss produced a round of soul searching about the party’s future. The toplines are that among registered voters, 38 percent view the GOP favorably, versus 60 percent who view it unfavorably; among Dems those numbers are 51-46.&lt;/em&gt;

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale -</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>Still waiting for your prediction of sub-40 to come true, I might add...</p>
<p>But you're right, it was mostly a plateau month for Obama, on average.</p>
<p>Obama's numbers look bad... until you look at Boehner's... or McConnell's... or the Republican Party in general...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/08/05/a-majority-of-people-dont-like-their-own-congressman-for-the-first-time-ever/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/08/05/a-majority-of-people-dont-like-their-own-congressman-for-the-first-time-ever/</a></p>
<p>and...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/05/morning-plum-gop-in-doghouse-among-women-nonwhites-young/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/05/morning-plum-gop-in-doghouse-among-women-nonwhites-young/</a></p>
<p>From that last one:</p>
<p><em>But the relative ratings of the Republican and Democratic parties are also noteworthy, particularly among key voter groups that GOP leaders have been hoping to improve their appeal among ever since the 2012 loss produced a round of soul searching about the party’s future. The toplines are that among registered voters, 38 percent view the GOP favorably, versus 60 percent who view it unfavorably; among Dems those numbers are 51-46.</em></p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51346</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 02:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51346</guid>
		<description>I doubt many sitting politicians are above water at this time.  The natives (AKA We the People) are restless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt many sitting politicians are above water at this time.  The natives (AKA We the People) are restless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John From Censornati</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51345</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Censornati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51345</guid>
		<description>July was a very good month. I was quite pleased with President Obama&#039;s tyrannical and lawless ENDA-ish executive order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July was a very good month. I was quite pleased with President Obama's tyrannical and lawless ENDA-ish executive order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/05/opw1407/#comment-51339</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9456#comment-51339</guid>
		<description>I was actually dreading this OPW commentary, as Obama pretty much ended July where he started July...

41.7 Approval Rating..

But, I gotta admit, CW...

Ya cheered me up...  :D

Tanks....

And Planes!!!!

yuk yuk yuk...

That never gets old...  :D

Seriously, though...

How ANYONE can say things are going good for Obama is beyond me...

Ya&#039;all sound like Republicans when Bush numbers started to tank..

&quot;It&#039;s OK...&quot;  &quot;It&#039;s not bad&quot;...  &quot;It&#039;ll turn around&quot;...

What&#039;s it going to take for ya&#039;all to concede that Obama is NOT the messiah, is NOT god&#039;s gift to the American People and has a REAL leadership problem??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually dreading this OPW commentary, as Obama pretty much ended July where he started July...</p>
<p>41.7 Approval Rating..</p>
<p>But, I gotta admit, CW...</p>
<p>Ya cheered me up...  :D</p>
<p>Tanks....</p>
<p>And Planes!!!!</p>
<p>yuk yuk yuk...</p>
<p>That never gets old...  :D</p>
<p>Seriously, though...</p>
<p>How ANYONE can say things are going good for Obama is beyond me...</p>
<p>Ya'all sound like Republicans when Bush numbers started to tank..</p>
<p>"It's OK..."  "It's not bad"...  "It'll turn around"...</p>
<p>What's it going to take for ya'all to concede that Obama is NOT the messiah, is NOT god's gift to the American People and has a REAL leadership problem??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
