<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rape Victim Ad In Montana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 13:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [306] -- End Of Reefer Madness?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-49132</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [306] -- End Of Reefer Madness?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 00:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-49132</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote recently about how Democrats should frame this issue, in the strongest terms possible. Representative Alan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote recently about how Democrats should frame this issue, in the strongest terms possible. Representative Alan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points &#8212; End Of Reefer Madness? &#124; Gridtips</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-49131</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points &#8212; End Of Reefer Madness? &#124; Gridtips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 00:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-49131</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote recently about how Democrats should frame this issue, in the strongest terms possible. Representative Alan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote recently about how Democrats should frame this issue, in the strongest terms possible. Representative Alan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points -- End Of Reefer Madness?&#160;&#124;&#160;Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-49129</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points -- End Of Reefer Madness?&#160;&#124;&#160;Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 00:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-49129</guid>
		<description>[...] please take note.&quot;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Championing incestuous fathers&#039; parental rightsI wrote recently about how Democrats should frame this issue, in the strongest terms possible. Representative Alan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] please take note.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Championing incestuous fathers&#39; parental rightsI wrote recently about how Democrats should frame this issue, in the strongest terms possible. Representative Alan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points &#8212; From Bears to Zombies &#124; InfoClose</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-48978</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points &#8212; From Bears to Zombies &#124; InfoClose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 10:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-48978</guid>
		<description>[...] you find this week&#8217;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana &#8212; which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you find this week&#8217;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana &#8212; which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [305] &#8212; From Bears to Zombies &#171; Democrats for Progress</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-48915</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [305] &#8212; From Bears to Zombies &#171; Democrats for Progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 02:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-48915</guid>
		<description>[...] you find this week&#8217;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana &#8212; which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you find this week&#8217;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana &#8212; which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points -- From Bears To Zombies&#160;&#124;&#160;Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-48911</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points -- From Bears To Zombies&#160;&#124;&#160;Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 02:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-48911</guid>
		<description>[...] response).If you find this week&#039;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana -- which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] response).If you find this week&#39;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana -- which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [305] -- From Bears To Zombies</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-48907</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [305] -- From Bears To Zombies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 01:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-48907</guid>
		<description>[...] you find this week&#039;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana -- which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you find this week&#39;s talking points a bit too zany, well, earlier this week I wrote a much more serious column about a political ad from Montana -- which features a rape survivor talking about what a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisabledDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-48863</link>
		<dc:creator>DisabledDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 13:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-48863</guid>
		<description>The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology defines pregnancy as beginning at implantation in the uterus (sadly, many Ob/Gyns do not know that). Therefore, these new &#039;personhood&#039; laws actually try to declare a person to exist before a pregnancy officially starts. Obviously, there are a lot of problems with that, far beyond the need for exceptions for rape and incest victims. (It is also incorrect that these are statistically rare; recent research shows that pregnancy actually occurs MORE commonly after rape than would be expected from single-incident intercourse, not less). Part of the reason for ACOG&#039;s choice of definition, I suspect, is that pregnancy tests are unlikely to ever be developed that turn positive before implantation. Another part is to exclude ectopic pregnancy -- pregnancy outside the uterus (usually in the fallopian tube). These must be surgically removed or treated with methotrexate when discovered, or they have a high likelihood of killing the mother. It used to be thought that they rarely developed far enough to have a heartbeat, but better ultrasound proved that wrong. Many ectopics do indeed have a heartbeat. Unfortunately, the chance of a viable pregnancy is nil, as the tube cannot expand enough to contain a pregnancy. If nothing were done, in 80-90% of cases the mother would die of hemorrhage from a ruptured tube, and the rest of the time the pregnancy would miscarry into the abdomen, causing pain and scarring that could prevent future pregnancy; there would be no successful pregnancies. Many of these &#039;personhood&#039; laws are written in such a way that they could make treatment of ectopic pregnancy illegal. Nor is ectopic a rare occurrence -- as a general Ob/gyn, I dealt with one every month or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology defines pregnancy as beginning at implantation in the uterus (sadly, many Ob/Gyns do not know that). Therefore, these new 'personhood' laws actually try to declare a person to exist before a pregnancy officially starts. Obviously, there are a lot of problems with that, far beyond the need for exceptions for rape and incest victims. (It is also incorrect that these are statistically rare; recent research shows that pregnancy actually occurs MORE commonly after rape than would be expected from single-incident intercourse, not less). Part of the reason for ACOG's choice of definition, I suspect, is that pregnancy tests are unlikely to ever be developed that turn positive before implantation. Another part is to exclude ectopic pregnancy -- pregnancy outside the uterus (usually in the fallopian tube). These must be surgically removed or treated with methotrexate when discovered, or they have a high likelihood of killing the mother. It used to be thought that they rarely developed far enough to have a heartbeat, but better ultrasound proved that wrong. Many ectopics do indeed have a heartbeat. Unfortunately, the chance of a viable pregnancy is nil, as the tube cannot expand enough to contain a pregnancy. If nothing were done, in 80-90% of cases the mother would die of hemorrhage from a ruptured tube, and the rest of the time the pregnancy would miscarry into the abdomen, causing pain and scarring that could prevent future pregnancy; there would be no successful pregnancies. Many of these 'personhood' laws are written in such a way that they could make treatment of ectopic pregnancy illegal. Nor is ectopic a rare occurrence -- as a general Ob/gyn, I dealt with one every month or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comment-48859</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123#comment-48859</guid>
		<description>For obvious reasons, I don&#039;t have a dog in this hunt.  And I am on record at expressing disdain for the GOP&#039;s position that life begins at &quot;Gee, yer hot...&quot;

But let me ask you this..

Would you be for the legislation if it carved out exemptions for victims of sexual assaults and rapes??

The reason I ask is that you seem to be railing against the lack of logical and rational exemptions, rather than the legislation itself..

I am just curious..

My own personal belief is that a fetus becomes a person when it can viably survive outside the mother..

I know that belief is fraught with equivalences (both actual and false) and has little scientific basis..  

It&#039;s just my gut...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Does it work?&quot;
&quot;It&#039;s what we got.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-DEMOLITION MAN


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For obvious reasons, I don't have a dog in this hunt.  And I am on record at expressing disdain for the GOP's position that life begins at "Gee, yer hot..."</p>
<p>But let me ask you this..</p>
<p>Would you be for the legislation if it carved out exemptions for victims of sexual assaults and rapes??</p>
<p>The reason I ask is that you seem to be railing against the lack of logical and rational exemptions, rather than the legislation itself..</p>
<p>I am just curious..</p>
<p>My own personal belief is that a fetus becomes a person when it can viably survive outside the mother..</p>
<p>I know that belief is fraught with equivalences (both actual and false) and has little scientific basis..  </p>
<p>It's just my gut...</p>
<p><b>"Does it work?"<br />
"It's what we got."</b><br />
-DEMOLITION MAN</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
