<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How About A Saturnalia Display?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44557</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44557</guid>
		<description>LewDan -

Depends, of course, on the definition of &quot;establishing&quot; a religion.  I&#039;m fairly absolutist in this regard, as I consider it unconstitutional for the IRS to determine who &quot;is&quot; and who &quot;is not&quot; a a valid &quot;religion.&quot;  That, to me, is establishment, right there.  

Although I have to admit, you seem to be caught in an oxymoron, with &quot;yet another unconstitutional constitutional amendment.&quot;  ANY amendment, when ratified, is part of the Constitution.  Whether it is idiotic or not (see: Prohibition), it is, by definition, constitutional, being part of the founding document after ratification.  But perhaps I&#039;m splitting hairs....

When the Constitution itself was ratified, only a few states would have subscribed to the modern view of separation of church and state -- perhaps Rhode Island and maybe Pennsylvania?  In most states, atheist displays would have been (legally) shunned.  

As for midwinter festivals, here&#039;s an article from 2007 for you:

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/24/why-christmas-is-not-on-the-solstice/

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LewDan -</p>
<p>Depends, of course, on the definition of "establishing" a religion.  I'm fairly absolutist in this regard, as I consider it unconstitutional for the IRS to determine who "is" and who "is not" a a valid "religion."  That, to me, is establishment, right there.  </p>
<p>Although I have to admit, you seem to be caught in an oxymoron, with "yet another unconstitutional constitutional amendment."  ANY amendment, when ratified, is part of the Constitution.  Whether it is idiotic or not (see: Prohibition), it is, by definition, constitutional, being part of the founding document after ratification.  But perhaps I'm splitting hairs....</p>
<p>When the Constitution itself was ratified, only a few states would have subscribed to the modern view of separation of church and state -- perhaps Rhode Island and maybe Pennsylvania?  In most states, atheist displays would have been (legally) shunned.  </p>
<p>As for midwinter festivals, here's an article from 2007 for you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/24/why-christmas-is-not-on-the-solstice/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/24/why-christmas-is-not-on-the-solstice/</a></p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1]&#160;&#124;&#160;Political Ration</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44552</link>
		<dc:creator>My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1]&#160;&#124;&#160;Political Ration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44552</guid>
		<description>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44547</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44547</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;http://backstoryradio.org/shows/happy-holidays-a-history-of-the-season/

Check it all, including you Michale, I think you&#039;ll find the actual American of tradition of Christmas quite fascinating. As with most things our perceptions of Christmas have more to say about ourselves than anything else.&lt;/I&gt;

I am not big on holiday traditions...

Personally, I would be happy to go from 15 Oct to 16 Jan and just skip the whole thing...

With, of course, carving out an exemption for the Annual Weigantia Fund Raiser...

Having said all that, just let me say this..

That Santa looks REALLY creepy..  If I were to find him in my house, I think he would be on the business end of my Remington Riot Control Shotgun..  :D

&lt;I&gt;As with most things our perceptions of Christmas have more to say about ourselves than anything else.&lt;/I&gt;

Truer words were never spoken...

Michale
0241</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><a href="http://backstoryradio.org/shows/happy-holidays-a-history-of-the-season/" rel="nofollow">http://backstoryradio.org/shows/happy-holidays-a-history-of-the-season/</a></p>
<p>Check it all, including you Michale, I think you'll find the actual American of tradition of Christmas quite fascinating. As with most things our perceptions of Christmas have more to say about ourselves than anything else.</i></p>
<p>I am not big on holiday traditions...</p>
<p>Personally, I would be happy to go from 15 Oct to 16 Jan and just skip the whole thing...</p>
<p>With, of course, carving out an exemption for the Annual Weigantia Fund Raiser...</p>
<p>Having said all that, just let me say this..</p>
<p>That Santa looks REALLY creepy..  If I were to find him in my house, I think he would be on the business end of my Remington Riot Control Shotgun..  :D</p>
<p><i>As with most things our perceptions of Christmas have more to say about ourselves than anything else.</i></p>
<p>Truer words were never spoken...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
0241</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1] &#124; Both Sides Clash</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44536</link>
		<dc:creator>My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1] &#124; Both Sides Clash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44536</guid>
		<description>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1] &#171; Democrats for Progress</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44525</link>
		<dc:creator>My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1] &#171; Democrats for Progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44525</guid>
		<description>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewsCenterd &#187; My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44517</link>
		<dc:creator>NewsCenterd &#187; My 2013 &#8216;McLaughlin Awards&#8217; [Part 1]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 03:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44517</guid>
		<description>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year&#8217;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &#8220;seasonal displays on public property&#8221; thing, from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; My 2013 &#34;McLaughlin Awards&#34; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44510</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; My 2013 &#34;McLaughlin Awards&#34; [Part 1]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 02:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44510</guid>
		<description>[...] year&#039;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &quot;seasonal displays on public property&quot; thing, from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year&#39;s-end, there were several notable groups of people having fun with the whole &quot;seasonal displays on public property&quot; thing, from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YoYoTheAssyrian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44480</link>
		<dc:creator>YoYoTheAssyrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44480</guid>
		<description>http://backstoryradio.org/shows/happy-holidays-a-history-of-the-season/

Check it all, including you Michale, I think you&#039;ll find the actual American of tradition of Christmas quite fascinating. As with most things our perceptions of Christmas have more to say about ourselves than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://backstoryradio.org/shows/happy-holidays-a-history-of-the-season/" rel="nofollow">http://backstoryradio.org/shows/happy-holidays-a-history-of-the-season/</a></p>
<p>Check it all, including you Michale, I think you'll find the actual American of tradition of Christmas quite fascinating. As with most things our perceptions of Christmas have more to say about ourselves than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44457</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44457</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; It cloaks its arbitrary abuses in legal seeming rationalizations thanks to the democratic process and its abject indifference of the majority to anything viewed as not directly and immediately affecting them.&lt;/I&gt;

As opposed to those who go out of their way to be professionally offended by anything and everything, regardless of whether or not they have a dog in the hunt..   :D


Michale
0219</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> It cloaks its arbitrary abuses in legal seeming rationalizations thanks to the democratic process and its abject indifference of the majority to anything viewed as not directly and immediately affecting them.</i></p>
<p>As opposed to those who go out of their way to be professionally offended by anything and everything, regardless of whether or not they have a dog in the hunt..   :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
0219</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LewDan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44453</link>
		<dc:creator>LewDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44453</guid>
		<description>Actually, Chris, the constitution prohibits government establishing any religion. SCOTUS is the one who, in yet another unconstitutional constitutional amendment, decided government must allow &quot;all or none.&quot; The two are not the same. The constitutional intent was to protect the right to worship by forbidding the use of government to impose ones religious beliefs and practices on others. Ask gays, lesbians, and abortion providers about how well that&#039;s worked out under the SCOTUS &quot;interpretation!&quot; Just as mandating equivalent atheist displays and mocking anti-religious displays are fully in keeping with SCOTUS&#039; rulings and completely counter to the intent of the constitution. Using government to belittle, harass, and, hopefully, inhibit religious practices is exactly what the constitution sought to outlaw, trying to impose ones religious practices, or lack of them, on others with different beliefs.

Also, midwinter festivals have been universal throughout history and were merely coopted by Christians. &quot;Christmas&quot; celebrations have little, or nothing, to do with Christianity. Just because Christianity seeks to claim a festival and has been successful in getting it &quot;rebranded&quot; with their trademark doesn&#039;t mean its all about them! Christ wasn&#039;t born anywhere near Christmas day and Kris Kringle has never had anything to do with the practice of Christianity. The &quot;commercialization&quot; of Christmas is actually truer to its foundations than supposed Christian religious practices. Perhaps that&#039;s why its so much more pervasive, and Christmas never really about Christianity. Though Christians have been trying for centuries to make it so. Our country&#039;s greatest failing is that its never practiced the rule of law. It cloaks its arbitrary abuses in legal seeming rationalizations thanks to the democratic process and its abject indifference of the majority to anything viewed as not directly and immediately affecting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Chris, the constitution prohibits government establishing any religion. SCOTUS is the one who, in yet another unconstitutional constitutional amendment, decided government must allow "all or none." The two are not the same. The constitutional intent was to protect the right to worship by forbidding the use of government to impose ones religious beliefs and practices on others. Ask gays, lesbians, and abortion providers about how well that's worked out under the SCOTUS "interpretation!" Just as mandating equivalent atheist displays and mocking anti-religious displays are fully in keeping with SCOTUS' rulings and completely counter to the intent of the constitution. Using government to belittle, harass, and, hopefully, inhibit religious practices is exactly what the constitution sought to outlaw, trying to impose ones religious practices, or lack of them, on others with different beliefs.</p>
<p>Also, midwinter festivals have been universal throughout history and were merely coopted by Christians. "Christmas" celebrations have little, or nothing, to do with Christianity. Just because Christianity seeks to claim a festival and has been successful in getting it "rebranded" with their trademark doesn't mean its all about them! Christ wasn't born anywhere near Christmas day and Kris Kringle has never had anything to do with the practice of Christianity. The "commercialization" of Christmas is actually truer to its foundations than supposed Christian religious practices. Perhaps that's why its so much more pervasive, and Christmas never really about Christianity. Though Christians have been trying for centuries to make it so. Our country's greatest failing is that its never practiced the rule of law. It cloaks its arbitrary abuses in legal seeming rationalizations thanks to the democratic process and its abject indifference of the majority to anything viewed as not directly and immediately affecting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/18/how-about-a-saturnalia-display/#comment-44449</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8380#comment-44449</guid>
		<description>Let me preface this comment by saying that my attitudes towards religion are well known and the following is not ANY endorsement of religion.

Having said that, I wouldn&#039;t say that the United States is a &quot;secular&quot; nation.

It&#039;s a country that was founded on Christian values and the influence of religion is weaved into the fabric of this nation.  Much to my chagrin..

It&#039;s a country founded on the notion that government can&#039;t cannot endorse any religion over any other religion.  Further, the government cannot, ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL, refuse &quot;equal time&quot; (so to speak) to other religions.

The &quot;All Things Being Equal&quot; is the important part of that last...

Michale
0212</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me preface this comment by saying that my attitudes towards religion are well known and the following is not ANY endorsement of religion.</p>
<p>Having said that, I wouldn't say that the United States is a "secular" nation.</p>
<p>It's a country that was founded on Christian values and the influence of religion is weaved into the fabric of this nation.  Much to my chagrin..</p>
<p>It's a country founded on the notion that government can't cannot endorse any religion over any other religion.  Further, the government cannot, ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL, refuse "equal time" (so to speak) to other religions.</p>
<p>The "All Things Being Equal" is the important part of that last...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
0212</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
