<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delay Iran Sanctions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 07:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44206</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44206</guid>
		<description>I too would like to see more Foreign Policy debates around here. 

Not for the least of which, it&#039;s my strong suit.  :D

&lt;I&gt;Granted, there are issues that are that simple but very few in the realm of foreign policy.&lt;/I&gt;

Not really.  When you get right down to it, things are usually very black and white. 

It&#039;s only the diplomats and the politicians who like to inject &quot;nuance&quot; into the issues..

For example, the monitoring of foreign leaders communications.

Bad.  No matter how you slice it, it&#039;s bad.  It&#039;s bad and it&#039;s wrong..

See??  

Black and white.  No shades of gray whatsoever...  :D

Michale
104</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too would like to see more Foreign Policy debates around here. </p>
<p>Not for the least of which, it's my strong suit.  :D</p>
<p><i>Granted, there are issues that are that simple but very few in the realm of foreign policy.</i></p>
<p>Not really.  When you get right down to it, things are usually very black and white. </p>
<p>It's only the diplomats and the politicians who like to inject "nuance" into the issues..</p>
<p>For example, the monitoring of foreign leaders communications.</p>
<p>Bad.  No matter how you slice it, it's bad.  It's bad and it's wrong..</p>
<p>See??  </p>
<p>Black and white.  No shades of gray whatsoever...  :D</p>
<p>Michale<br />
104</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44200</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44200</guid>
		<description>Michale,

Sorry ... guess I was having a moment ... of clear-headed thinking ... heh.

It&#039;s just that in your world, where your way of looking at things is the rational way, it is too easy to see things in a very distorted way ... so much so that what is perceived is actually contrary to the facts - not your facts or my facts but THE facts.

We don&#039;t get the opportunity to discuss US foreign policy around here quite as much as I would like but I&#039;m going to take every opportunity to persuade you of the hazards of seeing too many things in a black and white, right and wrong sort of way. Granted, there are issues that are that simple but very few in the realm of foreign policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>Sorry ... guess I was having a moment ... of clear-headed thinking ... heh.</p>
<p>It's just that in your world, where your way of looking at things is the rational way, it is too easy to see things in a very distorted way ... so much so that what is perceived is actually contrary to the facts - not your facts or my facts but THE facts.</p>
<p>We don't get the opportunity to discuss US foreign policy around here quite as much as I would like but I'm going to take every opportunity to persuade you of the hazards of seeing too many things in a black and white, right and wrong sort of way. Granted, there are issues that are that simple but very few in the realm of foreign policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44195</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 23:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44195</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Sir, we&#039;re having a problem in the cockpit.&quot;
&quot;The cockpit!!?  What is it!!!??&quot;
&quot;It&#039;s that little room in front of the plane, but that&#039;s not important right now.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Airplane

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Sir, we're having a problem in the cockpit."<br />
"The cockpit!!?  What is it!!!??"<br />
"It's that little room in front of the plane, but that's not important right now."</b><br />
-Airplane</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44194</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44194</guid>
		<description>M, (17)

A free news stand.

The New Yorker posts some articles in their entirety, maybe they&#039;ll pull down the barriers a few days out.  To burnish their prestige a bit more.

It&#039;s really a good piece, with examples showing how both right and left view Federal Government to have failed. Yet both sides talk about the Constitution the way fundamentalists talk about the Bible.

Jefferson wanted the Constitution to sundown at 19 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M, (17)</p>
<p>A free news stand.</p>
<p>The New Yorker posts some articles in their entirety, maybe they'll pull down the barriers a few days out.  To burnish their prestige a bit more.</p>
<p>It's really a good piece, with examples showing how both right and left view Federal Government to have failed. Yet both sides talk about the Constitution the way fundamentalists talk about the Bible.</p>
<p>Jefferson wanted the Constitution to sundown at 19 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44192</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44192</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;That&#039;s why I didn&#039;t paste a link. It&#039;s worth a trip to the library.&lt;/I&gt;

What&#039;s a.....  &quot;library&quot;???  

:p

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That's why I didn't paste a link. It's worth a trip to the library.</i></p>
<p>What's a.....  "library"???  </p>
<p>:p</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44191</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44191</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I didn&#039;t paste a link.  It&#039;s worth a trip to the library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's why I didn't paste a link.  It's worth a trip to the library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44189</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44189</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, it&#039;s a Pay Site...

While I *DO* want to read it, I just don&#039;t want to read it THAT bad...  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it's a Pay Site...</p>
<p>While I *DO* want to read it, I just don't want to read it THAT bad...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44188</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44188</guid>
		<description>Uh......

&lt;B&gt;ANNALS OF LAWOUR BROKEN CONSTITUTIONEveryone agrees that government isn’t working. Are the founders to blame?
BY JEFFREY TOOBIN
DECEMBER 9, 2013&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/12/09/131209fa_fact_toobin


Apparently, Toobin is ALSO a time traveler....  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh......</p>
<p><b>ANNALS OF LAWOUR BROKEN CONSTITUTIONEveryone agrees that government isn’t working. Are the founders to blame?<br />
BY JEFFREY TOOBIN<br />
DECEMBER 9, 2013</b><br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/12/09/131209fa_fact_toobin" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/12/09/131209fa_fact_toobin</a></p>
<p>Apparently, Toobin is ALSO a time traveler....  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44187</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44187</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to bring an article in The New Yorker to the attention of CW.com

Annals of Law
Our Broken Constitution
Everyone agrees that government isn’t working. Are the founders to blame?
by Jeffrey Toobin December 9, 2013


Find a copy, read it.  Toobin&#039;s at his best in print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to bring an article in The New Yorker to the attention of CW.com</p>
<p>Annals of Law<br />
Our Broken Constitution<br />
Everyone agrees that government isn’t working. Are the founders to blame?<br />
by Jeffrey Toobin December 9, 2013</p>
<p>Find a copy, read it.  Toobin's at his best in print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44186</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44186</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;There is no red man or white man.  Just shades of pink...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Soul Man

:D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"There is no red man or white man.  Just shades of pink..."</b><br />
-Soul Man</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44185</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44185</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;You have a very shallow perspective on foreign policy, I&#039;m afraid to say.&lt;/I&gt;

Well, if you change &quot;shallow&quot; to &quot;simple&quot;, I would agree with you wholeheartedly..

In my world, things are very black and white, right and wrong..

&lt;I&gt;Sadly, there appears to be no room for a rational, substantive discussion with you about these matters. And, I simply don&#039;t have time for this nonsense.&lt;/I&gt;

Actually, my way IS the more rational...

None of this politically correct or &quot;shades of gray&quot; crap...

Just the facts, Ma&#039;am....  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You have a very shallow perspective on foreign policy, I'm afraid to say.</i></p>
<p>Well, if you change "shallow" to "simple", I would agree with you wholeheartedly..</p>
<p>In my world, things are very black and white, right and wrong..</p>
<p><i>Sadly, there appears to be no room for a rational, substantive discussion with you about these matters. And, I simply don't have time for this nonsense.</i></p>
<p>Actually, my way IS the more rational...</p>
<p>None of this politically correct or "shades of gray" crap...</p>
<p>Just the facts, Ma'am....  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44184</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44184</guid>
		<description>Michale,

You have a very shallow perspective on foreign policy, I&#039;m afraid to say. 

Sadly, there appears to be no room for a rational, substantive discussion with you about these matters. And, I simply don&#039;t have time for this nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>You have a very shallow perspective on foreign policy, I'm afraid to say. </p>
<p>Sadly, there appears to be no room for a rational, substantive discussion with you about these matters. And, I simply don't have time for this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44183</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44183</guid>
		<description>In essence, it simply supports the theorem:

&lt;B&gt;Obama has never met an ally he didn&#039;t want to throw under the bus....&lt;/B&gt;


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In essence, it simply supports the theorem:</p>
<p><b>Obama has never met an ally he didn't want to throw under the bus....</b></p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44182</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44182</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The point is that no one is kissing anybody else&#039;s ass.&lt;/I&gt;

Perhaps you have another name for it?

Obama et al was rip-roaring to tell China to stuff it..

They even flew FON exercises THRU China&#039;s new ADIZ, effectively giving The People&#039;s Air Force the finger..

THEN, Obama advises civilian airlines to obey China&#039;s rules and reversed course.

&lt;B&gt;&quot;It wasn&#039;t the declaration of the ADIZ that actually was destabilizing,&quot; said Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, America&#039;s highest-ranking military officer. &quot;It was their assertion that they would cause all aircraft entering the ADIZ to report regardless of whether they were intending to enter into the sovereign airspace of China. And that is destabilizing.&quot;

That&#039;s a change from just a few days ago, when U.S. Vice President Joe Biden demanded that China take back its declaration of the zone. And it&#039;s another demonstration that China&#039;s recent decisions have forced the United States to tread carefully. On Wednesday, Biden met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing for more than five hours, according to a senior administration official. In brief public remarks midway through the marathon session, Biden didn&#039;t mention the air defense zone at all.&lt;/B&gt;

Now, you might call it something different, but it&#039;s CLEARLY kissing China&#039;s arse...

You might even say there is good reason to do it and you might be right.

But it&#039;s STILL kissing China&#039;s arse...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The point is that no one is kissing anybody else's ass.</i></p>
<p>Perhaps you have another name for it?</p>
<p>Obama et al was rip-roaring to tell China to stuff it..</p>
<p>They even flew FON exercises THRU China's new ADIZ, effectively giving The People's Air Force the finger..</p>
<p>THEN, Obama advises civilian airlines to obey China's rules and reversed course.</p>
<p><b>"It wasn't the declaration of the ADIZ that actually was destabilizing," said Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, America's highest-ranking military officer. "It was their assertion that they would cause all aircraft entering the ADIZ to report regardless of whether they were intending to enter into the sovereign airspace of China. And that is destabilizing."</p>
<p>That's a change from just a few days ago, when U.S. Vice President Joe Biden demanded that China take back its declaration of the zone. And it's another demonstration that China's recent decisions have forced the United States to tread carefully. On Wednesday, Biden met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing for more than five hours, according to a senior administration official. In brief public remarks midway through the marathon session, Biden didn't mention the air defense zone at all.</b></p>
<p>Now, you might call it something different, but it's CLEARLY kissing China's arse...</p>
<p>You might even say there is good reason to do it and you might be right.</p>
<p>But it's STILL kissing China's arse...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44181</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44181</guid>
		<description>Michale,

The point is that no one is kissing anybody else&#039;s ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>The point is that no one is kissing anybody else's ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44180</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44180</guid>
		<description>The problem with additional delayed US sanctions is that existing sanctions and upcoming negotiations are multinational.  Suddenly and publicly injecting the threat of new sanctions without consultation will tend to undermine the Western Coalition, already a bit fractious, which plays into the hands of the Iranian hard liners. The perception of moving the goal posts a bit also helps Iranian hard liners.

So, in my view, delayed sanctions amount to trading off marginally more effective economic pressure for marginally more difficult negotiations.  

Some threats are better delivered privately, and think this is one of them.  All the benefits of the delayed sanction gambit would have been achieved by keeping the threat private, with far lower downside risk.  In fact, the threat may already have been delivered privately, probably was delivered in some form, and we just don&#039;t know about it. If so, little effect one way or the other.

None of this strikes me as a game changer, but I generally prefer simplicity to complexity in negotiations.  Overall rating, Meh.  Given senate egos, probably inevitable, and almost certainly anticipated by the State Department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with additional delayed US sanctions is that existing sanctions and upcoming negotiations are multinational.  Suddenly and publicly injecting the threat of new sanctions without consultation will tend to undermine the Western Coalition, already a bit fractious, which plays into the hands of the Iranian hard liners. The perception of moving the goal posts a bit also helps Iranian hard liners.</p>
<p>So, in my view, delayed sanctions amount to trading off marginally more effective economic pressure for marginally more difficult negotiations.  </p>
<p>Some threats are better delivered privately, and think this is one of them.  All the benefits of the delayed sanction gambit would have been achieved by keeping the threat private, with far lower downside risk.  In fact, the threat may already have been delivered privately, probably was delivered in some form, and we just don't know about it. If so, little effect one way or the other.</p>
<p>None of this strikes me as a game changer, but I generally prefer simplicity to complexity in negotiations.  Overall rating, Meh.  Given senate egos, probably inevitable, and almost certainly anticipated by the State Department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44179</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44179</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Do you think that China is the only one in that neighbourhood with an ADIZ? Hardly! And, they even overlap! Would you like to guess which country I&#039;m talking about?&lt;/I&gt;

Once again, you take a fact and come to a conclusion that is way out in Left Field..

The fact that China has an ADIZ is not the issue.

The fact that China just INCREASED it&#039;s ADIZ to take it into SOVEREIGN JAPANESE TERRITORY....

THAT is the issue here...

To put it into a more readily understandable context, it would be as if Russia extended it&#039;s ADIZ to cover all of Alaska or Mexico extended it&#039;s ADIZ to cover Southern California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas...

It&#039;s illegal and it&#039;s not right..

But apparently Japan now joins Israel under the Obama Bus...

To paraphrase Sheriff Brody, &lt;B&gt;&quot;We&#039;re gonna need a bigger bus&quot;....&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;By the way, please tell me you were kidding when you say you thought, at one time - at any time! - that foreign policy was Obama&#039;s strong suit!&lt;/I&gt;

Up until Egypt and Benghazi, yea... I thought Obama had it together when it came to foreign policy..

At least by comparison to his domestic policy which well and truly sucks..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Do you think that China is the only one in that neighbourhood with an ADIZ? Hardly! And, they even overlap! Would you like to guess which country I'm talking about?</i></p>
<p>Once again, you take a fact and come to a conclusion that is way out in Left Field..</p>
<p>The fact that China has an ADIZ is not the issue.</p>
<p>The fact that China just INCREASED it's ADIZ to take it into SOVEREIGN JAPANESE TERRITORY....</p>
<p>THAT is the issue here...</p>
<p>To put it into a more readily understandable context, it would be as if Russia extended it's ADIZ to cover all of Alaska or Mexico extended it's ADIZ to cover Southern California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas...</p>
<p>It's illegal and it's not right..</p>
<p>But apparently Japan now joins Israel under the Obama Bus...</p>
<p>To paraphrase Sheriff Brody, <b>"We're gonna need a bigger bus"....</b></p>
<p><i>By the way, please tell me you were kidding when you say you thought, at one time - at any time! - that foreign policy was Obama's strong suit!</i></p>
<p>Up until Egypt and Benghazi, yea... I thought Obama had it together when it came to foreign policy..</p>
<p>At least by comparison to his domestic policy which well and truly sucks..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44178</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44178</guid>
		<description>Michale,

We&#039;re going to have to start calling you the King of Misinformation.

Or is it just that your analytical skills are a bit lacking when it comes to US foreign policy in the Asia-Pacific, or what I like to call the Indo-Pacific region?

Do you think that China is the only one in that neighbourhood with an ADIZ? Hardly! And, they even overlap! Would you like to guess which country I&#039;m talking about?

Now, China is the only one going so far as to demand that aircraft passing through this zone identify themselves and their itinerary. That is not acceptable. 

By the way, please tell me you were kidding when you say you thought, at one time - at any time! - that foreign policy was Obama&#039;s strong suit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p>We're going to have to start calling you the King of Misinformation.</p>
<p>Or is it just that your analytical skills are a bit lacking when it comes to US foreign policy in the Asia-Pacific, or what I like to call the Indo-Pacific region?</p>
<p>Do you think that China is the only one in that neighbourhood with an ADIZ? Hardly! And, they even overlap! Would you like to guess which country I'm talking about?</p>
<p>Now, China is the only one going so far as to demand that aircraft passing through this zone identify themselves and their itinerary. That is not acceptable. </p>
<p>By the way, please tell me you were kidding when you say you thought, at one time - at any time! - that foreign policy was Obama's strong suit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44170</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44170</guid>
		<description>And in OTHER Foreign Policy news...

&lt;B&gt;Obama kisses Chinese Ass....&lt;/B&gt;
http://killerapps.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/12/04/team_obama_changes_course_appears_to_accept_china_air_defense_zone

:^/

Hard to believe that, at one time, everyone (myself included) thought Obama&#039;s STRONG suit was foreign policy...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in OTHER Foreign Policy news...</p>
<p><b>Obama kisses Chinese Ass....</b><br />
<a href="http://killerapps.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/12/04/team_obama_changes_course_appears_to_accept_china_air_defense_zone" rel="nofollow">http://killerapps.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/12/04/team_obama_changes_course_appears_to_accept_china_air_defense_zone</a></p>
<p>:^/</p>
<p>Hard to believe that, at one time, everyone (myself included) thought Obama's STRONG suit was foreign policy...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44169</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44169</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The White House is worried that passing more sanctions (even delayed ones) will seem like bad faith to the Iranians. &lt;/I&gt;

The fact that the White House is afraid of showing &quot;bad faith&quot; to the Go To Country for world terrorism is just one more indication that Obama is truly whacked...

As I said in the previous commentary, I think this plan is a good idea..

But the White House and the Left won&#039;t go for it.

Because it gives the GOP a huge win.. Especially in 6 months down the road when the new sanctions WILL kick in...

Because I can guarantee ya&#039;all one thing..

Iran is not negotiating in good faith.

Iran is using the North Korea path to becoming a nuclear power.

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The White House is worried that passing more sanctions (even delayed ones) will seem like bad faith to the Iranians. </i></p>
<p>The fact that the White House is afraid of showing "bad faith" to the Go To Country for world terrorism is just one more indication that Obama is truly whacked...</p>
<p>As I said in the previous commentary, I think this plan is a good idea..</p>
<p>But the White House and the Left won't go for it.</p>
<p>Because it gives the GOP a huge win.. Especially in 6 months down the road when the new sanctions WILL kick in...</p>
<p>Because I can guarantee ya'all one thing..</p>
<p>Iran is not negotiating in good faith.</p>
<p>Iran is using the North Korea path to becoming a nuclear power.</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/04/delay-iran-sanctions/#comment-44166</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 04:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8300#comment-44166</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Iran hawks have made it clear that they&#039;re not fans of the interim deal already.&quot;
 
Some more than others. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif. is advocating tactical nukes.  No word if he plans to ride one down, Major Kong style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Iran hawks have made it clear that they're not fans of the interim deal already."</p>
<p>Some more than others. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif. is advocating tactical nukes.  No word if he plans to ride one down, Major Kong style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
