<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points [259] -- Pivoting To Other News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37827</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37827</guid>
		<description>http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4770

That is everything that is wrong with the Left these days...


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4770" rel="nofollow">http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4770</a></p>
<p>That is everything that is wrong with the Left these days...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37824</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37824</guid>
		<description>Looks like Holder is going down for perjury.....


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Holder is going down for perjury.....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37821</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37821</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Additional scrutiny of conservative organizations’ activities by the IRS did not solely originate in the agency’s Cincinnati office, with requests for information coming from other offices and often bearing the signatures of higher-ups at the agency, according to attorneys representing some of the targeted groups. At least one letter requesting information about one of the groups bears the signature of Lois Lerner, the suspended director of the IRS Exempt Organizations department in Washington.&lt;/B&gt;
http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/28/18563008-irs-higher-ups-requested-info-on-conservative-groups-letters-show?lite

The more that comes to light, the more that the story about a couple low-level IRS staffers is being exposed as the BS pack 0 lies that it is...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Additional scrutiny of conservative organizations’ activities by the IRS did not solely originate in the agency’s Cincinnati office, with requests for information coming from other offices and often bearing the signatures of higher-ups at the agency, according to attorneys representing some of the targeted groups. At least one letter requesting information about one of the groups bears the signature of Lois Lerner, the suspended director of the IRS Exempt Organizations department in Washington.</b><br />
<a href="http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/28/18563008-irs-higher-ups-requested-info-on-conservative-groups-letters-show?lite" rel="nofollow">http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/28/18563008-irs-higher-ups-requested-info-on-conservative-groups-letters-show?lite</a></p>
<p>The more that comes to light, the more that the story about a couple low-level IRS staffers is being exposed as the BS pack 0 lies that it is...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37785</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37785</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As I said before the IRS thing isn&#039;t even a scandal. It&#039;s a complete joke &lt;/I&gt;

Let me put it this way...

According to ya&#039;all, the GOP is targeting minorities with their voter ID laws in an effort to sway and election and ya&#039;all go hysterically ballistic..

Yet, Obama&#039;s IRS targets conservatives for the same purpose and ya&#039;all say it&#039;s no big deal...

How is this NOT hypocrisy???

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As I said before the IRS thing isn't even a scandal. It's a complete joke </i></p>
<p>Let me put it this way...</p>
<p>According to ya'all, the GOP is targeting minorities with their voter ID laws in an effort to sway and election and ya'all go hysterically ballistic..</p>
<p>Yet, Obama's IRS targets conservatives for the same purpose and ya'all say it's no big deal...</p>
<p>How is this NOT hypocrisy???</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37767</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37767</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As I said before the IRS thing isn&#039;t even a scandal. It&#039;s a complete joke &lt;/I&gt;


&lt;B&gt;As The Daily Caller has reported, at least five different IRS offices including Cincinnati, Ohio; Baltimore, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois and El Monte and Laguna Niguel, California improperly targeted conservative nonprofit groups for extra scrutiny between 2010 and 2012.

The IRS’ shenanigans, chronicled in a damning report by Treasury Inspector General J. Russell George, started when a “team of [IRS] specialists” came together in April 2010 to process the tax-exempt nonprofit status of conservative groups that might be “potential political operations” (page 13 of the IG report). The IRS added “additional specialists” to this effort in December 2011.&lt;/B&gt;
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/27/washington-launches-four-different-investigations-into-irs-scandal/

Yea...  No scandal there..   :^/


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As I said before the IRS thing isn't even a scandal. It's a complete joke </i></p>
<p><b>As The Daily Caller has reported, at least five different IRS offices including Cincinnati, Ohio; Baltimore, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois and El Monte and Laguna Niguel, California improperly targeted conservative nonprofit groups for extra scrutiny between 2010 and 2012.</p>
<p>The IRS’ shenanigans, chronicled in a damning report by Treasury Inspector General J. Russell George, started when a “team of [IRS] specialists” came together in April 2010 to process the tax-exempt nonprofit status of conservative groups that might be “potential political operations” (page 13 of the IG report). The IRS added “additional specialists” to this effort in December 2011.</b><br />
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/27/washington-launches-four-different-investigations-into-irs-scandal/" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/27/washington-launches-four-different-investigations-into-irs-scandal/</a></p>
<p>Yea...  No scandal there..   :^/</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37765</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 11:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37765</guid>
		<description>A while back there was a commentary about how some Democrats saw their support go up after supporting Anti-Gun legislation...

&lt;B&gt;Lawmakers facing recall bids over strict gun laws in Colorado&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/28/lawmakers-facing-recall-bids-over-strict-gun-laws-in-colorado/#ixzz2UaHBbx5a

Apparently, the pendulum swings the other way now...

Politics is a fickle mistress....

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back there was a commentary about how some Democrats saw their support go up after supporting Anti-Gun legislation...</p>
<p><b>Lawmakers facing recall bids over strict gun laws in Colorado</b><br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/28/lawmakers-facing-recall-bids-over-strict-gun-laws-in-colorado/#ixzz2UaHBbx5a" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/28/lawmakers-facing-recall-bids-over-strict-gun-laws-in-colorado/#ixzz2UaHBbx5a</a></p>
<p>Apparently, the pendulum swings the other way now...</p>
<p>Politics is a fickle mistress....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37760</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 09:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37760</guid>
		<description>http://nationalreview.com/article/349372/obama-and-1917-espionage-act

Interesting article...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nationalreview.com/article/349372/obama-and-1917-espionage-act" rel="nofollow">http://nationalreview.com/article/349372/obama-and-1917-espionage-act</a></p>
<p>Interesting article...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37730</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37730</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The AP scandal as CW alludes to in his column is the only real &#039;scandal&#039; from the past couple of weeks.&lt;/I&gt;

So, yer backing FoxNews???

Color me surprised...  :^o


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The AP scandal as CW alludes to in his column is the only real 'scandal' from the past couple of weeks.</i></p>
<p>So, yer backing FoxNews???</p>
<p>Color me surprised...  :^o</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37729</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 14:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37729</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As I said before the IRS thing isn&#039;t even a scandal. It&#039;s a complete joke &lt;/I&gt;

Yea..  Postulate a GOP Administration&#039;s IRS targeting groups for audits because they were black.

Har  Har  Har

&lt;I&gt;Oh CW I have a new one for the list from this week - SaluteGate ;)&lt;/I&gt;

Spoken like a true military-ignorant person..

But, I have to give Obama credit.  

It was real class for him to return to that Marine, apologize and shake his hand..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As I said before the IRS thing isn't even a scandal. It's a complete joke </i></p>
<p>Yea..  Postulate a GOP Administration's IRS targeting groups for audits because they were black.</p>
<p>Har  Har  Har</p>
<p><i>Oh CW I have a new one for the list from this week - SaluteGate ;)</i></p>
<p>Spoken like a true military-ignorant person..</p>
<p>But, I have to give Obama credit.  </p>
<p>It was real class for him to return to that Marine, apologize and shake his hand..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37728</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37728</guid>
		<description>As I said before the IRS thing isn&#039;t even a scandal.  It&#039;s a complete joke (http://www.mattbors.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/994.png)

The AP scandal as CW alludes to in his column is the only real &#039;scandal&#039; from the past couple of weeks.

Oh CW I have a new one for the list from this week - SaluteGate ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said before the IRS thing isn't even a scandal.  It's a complete joke (<a href="http://www.mattbors.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/994.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattbors.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/994.png</a>)</p>
<p>The AP scandal as CW alludes to in his column is the only real 'scandal' from the past couple of weeks.</p>
<p>Oh CW I have a new one for the list from this week - SaluteGate ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37699</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 21:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37699</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;No, your comment is like claiming the census is racist because it asks if you&#039;re black, white, or Hispanic. &lt;/I&gt;

And Obama&#039;s IRS actions are like the census calling the cops and having families investigated because they put &quot;black&quot; on their census forms..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No, your comment is like claiming the census is racist because it asks if you're black, white, or Hispanic. </i></p>
<p>And Obama's IRS actions are like the census calling the cops and having families investigated because they put "black" on their census forms..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37693</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37693</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;You can&#039;t do that without investigating applicants&#039; politics!&lt;/I&gt;

And yet, *ONLY* conservative groups had their applications investigated..

THAT is the entire point..

The determination factor that initiated the investigations was SOLELY and COMPLETELY based on the ideological makeup of the groups in question..


It&#039;s the EXACT same thing as if ONLY black groups had their applications investigated.

THAT would be racist, right???

So, why is it OK to base an investigation on political ideology but it&#039;s NOT ok to base an investigation on race??

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You can't do that without investigating applicants' politics!</i></p>
<p>And yet, *ONLY* conservative groups had their applications investigated..</p>
<p>THAT is the entire point..</p>
<p>The determination factor that initiated the investigations was SOLELY and COMPLETELY based on the ideological makeup of the groups in question..</p>
<p>It's the EXACT same thing as if ONLY black groups had their applications investigated.</p>
<p>THAT would be racist, right???</p>
<p>So, why is it OK to base an investigation on political ideology but it's NOT ok to base an investigation on race??</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LewDan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37692</link>
		<dc:creator>LewDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37692</guid>
		<description>Michale,

&lt;i&gt;&quot;That&#039;s like claiming that a GOP Administration&#039;s IRS used words like &quot;black&quot; and &quot;hispanic&quot; to target tax-exempt groups and yet, there was NOTHING racist about it..&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

No, your comment is like claiming the census is racist because it asks if you&#039;re black, white, or Hispanic. Its the mission of the IRS to enforce a law that says groups engaged in political activity do not qualify under 501(c). You &lt;i&gt;can&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; do that without investigating applicants&#039; politics! Its not rocket science. As always, you and the Republicans are simply lying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p><i>"That's like claiming that a GOP Administration's IRS used words like "black" and "hispanic" to target tax-exempt groups and yet, there was NOTHING racist about it.."</i></p>
<p>No, your comment is like claiming the census is racist because it asks if you're black, white, or Hispanic. Its the mission of the IRS to enforce a law that says groups engaged in political activity do not qualify under 501(c). You <i>can't</i> do that without investigating applicants' politics! Its not rocket science. As always, you and the Republicans are simply lying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37683</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 09:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37683</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; But the scandal still hasn&#039;t touched the White House in any meaningful way, &lt;/I&gt;

You mean, other than the fact that the White House first lied about it and said no one at the White House knew...

Since they have a track record of lying over this, I wouldn&#039;t take their statements that Obama knew nothing at face value.

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> But the scandal still hasn't touched the White House in any meaningful way, </i></p>
<p>You mean, other than the fact that the White House first lied about it and said no one at the White House knew...</p>
<p>Since they have a track record of lying over this, I wouldn't take their statements that Obama knew nothing at face value.</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37682</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 08:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37682</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;Not so, Michale. I have a sneaky hunch that it&#039;s all YOUR fault ... :)&lt;/I&gt;

That would be my next guess..  :D

DB,

&lt;I&gt;The &quot;Tea Party&quot; is a political party. It says so right in the name. It has held political conventions. It had endorsed political candidates. It rightly deserves the additional scrutiny necessary to insure it complies with the law for the status it is trying to claim.&lt;/I&gt;

So, are you saying that a political group cannot perform social functions??

Because, it clearly states in the IRS regs (which I have posted in previous commentaries) that tax-exempt groups CAN perform protests and the like..

&lt;I&gt;Equally &quot;Tea Party Reenactments&quot; who yearly dump (hopefully non-polluting)tea into Boston harbor along with demonstrations of 18th Century life and historical readings; would not receive scrutiny beyond that showing the non-political nature of their programs. &lt;/I&gt;

And yet, that group would have received further scrutiny solely and completely because it had &quot;tea party&quot; in it&#039;s name..

THAT is the point you are missing..

To say that targeting groups with &quot;tea party&quot; or &quot;patriot&quot; associated with it is NOT targeting conservatives is to say that targeting groups that are black or hispanic is not racist.

&lt;I&gt;And yes, &quot;Elect Black Folks&quot; would deserve, and rightfully receive, additional scrutiny if they were to apply for tax-exempt status.&lt;/I&gt;

And yet, there is NO evidence that such groups (like BLACK AMERICANS FOR OBAMA) DID receive any such scrutiny.... 

No matter how you slice it, Obama&#039;s IRS moves was bigoted, illegal and completely un-American..  

That&#039;s what the majority of Democrats say, anyways..  :D

&lt;I&gt;. I haven&#039;t heard any Democrats blaming the Republicans &lt;/I&gt;

Of course you haven&#039;t...

That&#039;s because the majority of the MSM protects the Left..

http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/20/democratic-senator-goes-on-anti-gop-rant-over-climate-change-as-tornadoes-hit-oklahoma/

But, just because you didn&#039;t hear about it, doesn&#039;t mean it didn&#039;t happen..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>Not so, Michale. I have a sneaky hunch that it's all YOUR fault ... :)</i></p>
<p>That would be my next guess..  :D</p>
<p>DB,</p>
<p><i>The "Tea Party" is a political party. It says so right in the name. It has held political conventions. It had endorsed political candidates. It rightly deserves the additional scrutiny necessary to insure it complies with the law for the status it is trying to claim.</i></p>
<p>So, are you saying that a political group cannot perform social functions??</p>
<p>Because, it clearly states in the IRS regs (which I have posted in previous commentaries) that tax-exempt groups CAN perform protests and the like..</p>
<p><i>Equally "Tea Party Reenactments" who yearly dump (hopefully non-polluting)tea into Boston harbor along with demonstrations of 18th Century life and historical readings; would not receive scrutiny beyond that showing the non-political nature of their programs. </i></p>
<p>And yet, that group would have received further scrutiny solely and completely because it had "tea party" in it's name..</p>
<p>THAT is the point you are missing..</p>
<p>To say that targeting groups with "tea party" or "patriot" associated with it is NOT targeting conservatives is to say that targeting groups that are black or hispanic is not racist.</p>
<p><i>And yes, "Elect Black Folks" would deserve, and rightfully receive, additional scrutiny if they were to apply for tax-exempt status.</i></p>
<p>And yet, there is NO evidence that such groups (like BLACK AMERICANS FOR OBAMA) DID receive any such scrutiny.... </p>
<p>No matter how you slice it, Obama's IRS moves was bigoted, illegal and completely un-American..  </p>
<p>That's what the majority of Democrats say, anyways..  :D</p>
<p><i>. I haven't heard any Democrats blaming the Republicans </i></p>
<p>Of course you haven't...</p>
<p>That's because the majority of the MSM protects the Left..</p>
<p><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/20/democratic-senator-goes-on-anti-gop-rant-over-climate-change-as-tornadoes-hit-oklahoma/" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/20/democratic-senator-goes-on-anti-gop-rant-over-climate-change-as-tornadoes-hit-oklahoma/</a></p>
<p>But, just because you didn't hear about it, doesn't mean it didn't happen..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37672</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37672</guid>
		<description>Michale

We&#039;re back at it.

Any number of &quot;Black&quot; or &quot;Hispanic&quot; groups have and can perform many valuable social welfare services. They do not exist solely for political purposes. Their tax-exempt applications warrant the scrutiny necessary to insure they comply with the law.

The &quot;Tea Party&quot; is a political party. It says so right in the name. It has held political conventions. It had endorsed political candidates. It rightly deserves the additional scrutiny necessary to insure it complies with the law for the status it is trying to claim.

And yes, &quot;Elect Black Folks&quot; would deserve, and rightfully receive, additional scrutiny if they were to apply for tax-exempt status. Equally &quot;Tea Party Reenactments&quot; who yearly dump (hopefully non-polluting)tea into Boston harbor along with demonstrations of 18th Century life and historical readings; would not receive scrutiny beyond that showing the non-political nature of their programs. 

BTW it&#039;s the RWMO that claim the OK tornado was a test of the Obama Weather Weapon. I haven&#039;t heard any Democrats blaming the Republicans beyond wanting to remind the OK Republican Senators of the speeches they made refusing help to Hurricane Sandy victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale</p>
<p>We're back at it.</p>
<p>Any number of "Black" or "Hispanic" groups have and can perform many valuable social welfare services. They do not exist solely for political purposes. Their tax-exempt applications warrant the scrutiny necessary to insure they comply with the law.</p>
<p>The "Tea Party" is a political party. It says so right in the name. It has held political conventions. It had endorsed political candidates. It rightly deserves the additional scrutiny necessary to insure it complies with the law for the status it is trying to claim.</p>
<p>And yes, "Elect Black Folks" would deserve, and rightfully receive, additional scrutiny if they were to apply for tax-exempt status. Equally "Tea Party Reenactments" who yearly dump (hopefully non-polluting)tea into Boston harbor along with demonstrations of 18th Century life and historical readings; would not receive scrutiny beyond that showing the non-political nature of their programs. </p>
<p>BTW it's the RWMO that claim the OK tornado was a test of the Obama Weather Weapon. I haven't heard any Democrats blaming the Republicans beyond wanting to remind the OK Republican Senators of the speeches they made refusing help to Hurricane Sandy victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37665</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37665</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Yea, I know I know.. It&#039;s *ALL* the Republicans fault.....&lt;/I&gt;

Not so, Michale. I have a sneaky hunch that it&#039;s all YOUR fault ... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Yea, I know I know.. It's *ALL* the Republicans fault.....</i></p>
<p>Not so, Michale. I have a sneaky hunch that it's all YOUR fault ... :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37664</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37664</guid>
		<description>http://thehill.com/blogs/transportation-report/highways-bridges-and-roads/301977-washington-state-democrat-gop-throwing-american-infrastructureunder-the-bus

This is why I hate Democrats..

They just can&#039;t WAIT to use a tragedy and innocent victims to blame Republicans..

Whether it be a mass shooting in CT, a brutal tornado in OK or an infrastructure in WA, Democrats are the first to start fixing blame.

Maybe if they spent a TENTH of the time fixing the problem instead of trying to fix the blame, this country would be a LOT better off...

Yea, I know I know..  

It&#039;s *ALL* the Republicans fault.....


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/transportation-report/highways-bridges-and-roads/301977-washington-state-democrat-gop-throwing-american-infrastructureunder-the-bus" rel="nofollow">http://thehill.com/blogs/transportation-report/highways-bridges-and-roads/301977-washington-state-democrat-gop-throwing-american-infrastructureunder-the-bus</a></p>
<p>This is why I hate Democrats..</p>
<p>They just can't WAIT to use a tragedy and innocent victims to blame Republicans..</p>
<p>Whether it be a mass shooting in CT, a brutal tornado in OK or an infrastructure in WA, Democrats are the first to start fixing blame.</p>
<p>Maybe if they spent a TENTH of the time fixing the problem instead of trying to fix the blame, this country would be a LOT better off...</p>
<p>Yea, I know I know..  </p>
<p>It's *ALL* the Republicans fault.....</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37659</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37659</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; The IG report never said only conservative groups we&#039;re targeted,&lt;/I&gt;

Oh com&#039;on LD!

That&#039;s like claiming that a GOP Administration&#039;s IRS used words like &quot;black&quot; and &quot;hispanic&quot; to target tax-exempt groups and yet, there was NOTHING racist about it..

Sometimes I wonder if you really comprehend how utterly biased your claims are...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> The IG report never said only conservative groups we're targeted,</i></p>
<p>Oh com'on LD!</p>
<p>That's like claiming that a GOP Administration's IRS used words like "black" and "hispanic" to target tax-exempt groups and yet, there was NOTHING racist about it..</p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder if you really comprehend how utterly biased your claims are...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37651</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37651</guid>
		<description>Although I promised not to gloat (much) I can&#039;t help myself...  :D

&lt;I&gt;The more I learn about Eric Holder and how he operates the United States Department of Justice, the less I trust him.&lt;/I&gt;

In other words, the more you learn about Eric Holder, the more you realize how dead on ballz accurate about him I was, eh?  ;D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I promised not to gloat (much) I can't help myself...  :D</p>
<p><i>The more I learn about Eric Holder and how he operates the United States Department of Justice, the less I trust him.</i></p>
<p>In other words, the more you learn about Eric Holder, the more you realize how dead on ballz accurate about him I was, eh?  ;D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LewDan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/24/ftp259/#comment-37639</link>
		<dc:creator>LewDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7418#comment-37639</guid>
		<description>Enforcing the law is not &quot;overreach.&quot; There is no exception to the law for the media. The first amendment is about speech. It says government may not prohibit the press. That&#039;s all is says about the press. There is nothing about news gathering, only publishing. The forth amendment restriction on unreasonable search and seizure clearly doesn&#039;t apply. When you publish classified Intel its more than &quot;reasonable&quot; to assume you are in contact with violators, and conspiring to violate, the National Security Act., among others. And secret searches and seizures can&#039;t harass or intimidate anyone. They don&#039;t even know about them. The faux-outrage over being spied upon is hilarious! The press thinks its unconscionable for government to &quot;spy&quot; on the press because it could interfere with press ability to spy on everyone else! The press being far more essential to democracy than government or the rule of law. The protests over being investigated without proof of guilt are obvious gambits to place the press above the law. The press is not above the law. No one is. The concerted and apparently, near universal effort, to intimidate and extort Justice, so media outlets may engage in unlawful conduct with impunity, is far more dangerous to our democracy that any hypothetical &quot;chilling&quot; effects on law-breaking whistle-blowers. Especially since &quot;chilling-effects&quot; on law-breakers is why we enforce the law!

Likewise, the facts are clear that the IRS scandal is, in fact, manufactured. The IG report never said only conservative groups we&#039;re targeted, it criticized using key words in names to flag apps, not the keywords themselves, and said some of the follow up questions were burdensome and unnecessary. It also found that most of those flagged should have been flagged. That only 1/3 we&#039;re conservative groups. That only progressive groups&#039; apps we&#039;re denied. And that no one received extra scrutiny. The overworked, understaffed IRS office used the terms to flag apps for specialist inspection, instead of inspecting all apps, because of the volume of apps. And, of course, all of this he was, and is, known to the Republican Congressional &quot;investigators&quot; fomenting an misrepresenting this &quot;scandal.&quot; Finally, there&#039;s the revelation that, under the law, no one engaged in political activity is supposed to qualify for tax-exempt 501(c) status!

Like Benghazi, eight months and counting, still attempting to find proof of the scandal all Republicans have &quot;known&quot; all along, Democrats insist on helping Republicans hype this trash, by validating it in knee-jerk attempts at &quot;damage control,&quot; and treating a press that could care less about the truth and only wants sensational headlines to attract eyeballs and sell ads, as objective reporters serving the public interest. This country&#039;s government is nonfunctional because it has three branches and the forth estate, and none of them work honestly or in the public interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enforcing the law is not "overreach." There is no exception to the law for the media. The first amendment is about speech. It says government may not prohibit the press. That's all is says about the press. There is nothing about news gathering, only publishing. The forth amendment restriction on unreasonable search and seizure clearly doesn't apply. When you publish classified Intel its more than "reasonable" to assume you are in contact with violators, and conspiring to violate, the National Security Act., among others. And secret searches and seizures can't harass or intimidate anyone. They don't even know about them. The faux-outrage over being spied upon is hilarious! The press thinks its unconscionable for government to "spy" on the press because it could interfere with press ability to spy on everyone else! The press being far more essential to democracy than government or the rule of law. The protests over being investigated without proof of guilt are obvious gambits to place the press above the law. The press is not above the law. No one is. The concerted and apparently, near universal effort, to intimidate and extort Justice, so media outlets may engage in unlawful conduct with impunity, is far more dangerous to our democracy that any hypothetical "chilling" effects on law-breaking whistle-blowers. Especially since "chilling-effects" on law-breakers is why we enforce the law!</p>
<p>Likewise, the facts are clear that the IRS scandal is, in fact, manufactured. The IG report never said only conservative groups we're targeted, it criticized using key words in names to flag apps, not the keywords themselves, and said some of the follow up questions were burdensome and unnecessary. It also found that most of those flagged should have been flagged. That only 1/3 we're conservative groups. That only progressive groups' apps we're denied. And that no one received extra scrutiny. The overworked, understaffed IRS office used the terms to flag apps for specialist inspection, instead of inspecting all apps, because of the volume of apps. And, of course, all of this he was, and is, known to the Republican Congressional "investigators" fomenting an misrepresenting this "scandal." Finally, there's the revelation that, under the law, no one engaged in political activity is supposed to qualify for tax-exempt 501(c) status!</p>
<p>Like Benghazi, eight months and counting, still attempting to find proof of the scandal all Republicans have "known" all along, Democrats insist on helping Republicans hype this trash, by validating it in knee-jerk attempts at "damage control," and treating a press that could care less about the truth and only wants sensational headlines to attract eyeballs and sell ads, as objective reporters serving the public interest. This country's government is nonfunctional because it has three branches and the forth estate, and none of them work honestly or in the public interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
