<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Back To Work Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 01:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34387</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34387</guid>
		<description>No comments about how this &quot;Perfect Budget&quot; is all taxes and no cuts???

I am shocked, &lt;B&gt;SHOCKED!!!&lt;/B&gt; I tell you!!   :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comments about how this "Perfect Budget" is all taxes and no cuts???</p>
<p>I am shocked, <b>SHOCKED!!!</b> I tell you!!   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34376</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34376</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;that&#039;s pretty much exactly what it is. i just wish the voodoo shaman types would quit trying to work their mojo on schoolchildren.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, but as they say, &quot;Children are the future&quot;..

Once they&#039;re indoctrinated properly, they well be good little voters when they grow up...

Remember that old Anti-Smoking ad where two tobacco execs are lamenting over a smoker&#039;s dying body in the hospital.  As they exit the hospital, one says, &quot;Where are we going to find another loyal smoker like Joe?&quot;...  Scene cuts to a teenage girl sitting on a chair as the execs eye her as a new prospect..

I couldn&#039;t find the ad on youtube, but it&#039;s message goes beyond smoking..

Those who control the children, control the future...  :^/

Pardon me, but I am feeling very cynical this morning.. 

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>that's pretty much exactly what it is. i just wish the voodoo shaman types would quit trying to work their mojo on schoolchildren.</i></p>
<p>Yea, but as they say, "Children are the future"..</p>
<p>Once they're indoctrinated properly, they well be good little voters when they grow up...</p>
<p>Remember that old Anti-Smoking ad where two tobacco execs are lamenting over a smoker's dying body in the hospital.  As they exit the hospital, one says, "Where are we going to find another loyal smoker like Joe?"...  Scene cuts to a teenage girl sitting on a chair as the execs eye her as a new prospect..</p>
<p>I couldn't find the ad on youtube, but it's message goes beyond smoking..</p>
<p>Those who control the children, control the future...  :^/</p>
<p>Pardon me, but I am feeling very cynical this morning.. </p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34364</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34364</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Keep in mind that I am just a simple ground-pounding knuckle drag&#039;er who views high economic theory as some sort of voodoo magic..&lt;/i&gt;

that&#039;s pretty much exactly what it is. i just wish the voodoo shaman types would quit trying to work their mojo on schoolchildren.

~joshua</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Keep in mind that I am just a simple ground-pounding knuckle drag'er who views high economic theory as some sort of voodoo magic..</i></p>
<p>that's pretty much exactly what it is. i just wish the voodoo shaman types would quit trying to work their mojo on schoolchildren.</p>
<p>~joshua</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34284</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34284</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Ya&#039;all (of the Left) know that you have a problem when Bill Maher comes out and says the &quot;STICK IT TO THE RICH&quot; mentality is completely whacked...&lt;/I&gt;


At least, ya&#039;all SHOULD...

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ya'all (of the Left) know that you have a problem when Bill Maher comes out and says the "STICK IT TO THE RICH" mentality is completely whacked...</i></p>
<p>At least, ya'all SHOULD...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34283</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34283</guid>
		<description>http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/03/16/bill-maher-california-income-taxes-liberals-you-could-actually-lose-m#ixzz2NiYzskrX

Ya&#039;all (of the Left) know that you have a problem when Bill Maher comes out and says the &quot;STICK IT TO THE RICH&quot; mentality is completely whacked...


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/03/16/bill-maher-california-income-taxes-liberals-you-could-actually-lose-m#ixzz2NiYzskrX" rel="nofollow">http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/03/16/bill-maher-california-income-taxes-liberals-you-could-actually-lose-m#ixzz2NiYzskrX</a></p>
<p>Ya'all (of the Left) know that you have a problem when Bill Maher comes out and says the "STICK IT TO THE RICH" mentality is completely whacked...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34273</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 09:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34273</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that I am just a simple ground-pounding knuckle drag&#039;er who views high economic theory as some sort of voodoo magic..

My opinions are based on common sense...

Specifics:

&lt;B&gt;Job Creation&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;Infrastructure -- substantially increases infrastructure investment to the level the American Society of Civil Engineers says is necessary to close our infrastructure needs gap&lt;/I&gt;

Sounds nice.  A good idea...

How is it going to be paid for??


&lt;I&gt;Education -- funds school modernizations and rehiring laid-off teachers&lt;/I&gt;

Again.. It will take money.  Do Democrats think they can just print money??  Oh wait..  They do...

   
&lt;I&gt;Aid to States -- closes the recession-caused gap in state budgets for two years, allowing the rehiring of cops, firefighters, and other public employees&lt;/I&gt;

But only to states that voted Democrat or are dominated Democrats..  Those states who are dominated by Republicans can go pound sand..  Ironically enough, most of THOSE states don&#039;t NEED any help.  :D

&lt;I&gt;Making Work Pay -- boosts consumer demand by reinstating an expanded tax credit for three years&lt;/I&gt;

Another gimme that is paid for by American taxpayers..

&lt;I&gt;Emergency Unemployment Compensation -- allows beneficiaries to claim up to 99 weeks of unemployment benefits in high-unemployment states for two years&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, cuz those poor lazy crackheads deserve all the help they can get...
   
&lt;I&gt; Public Works Job Programs and Aid to Distressed Communities -- includes job programs such as a Park Improvement Corps, Student Jobs Corps, and Child Care Corps&lt;/I&gt;

Government jobs..  Yea, THAT&#039;s what we need more of...

 
&lt;B&gt;Fair Individual Tax&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;Immediately allows Bush tax cuts to expire for families earning over $250K&lt;/I&gt;

You mean small business owners who are already paying millions to cover the new regulations and healthcare costs that Democrats have imposed.\

Yea..  Raise their taxes.  *THAT* will help stimulate the economy..

   
&lt;I&gt; Higher tax rates for millionaires and billionaires (from 45% to 49%)&lt;/I&gt;

Which wouldn&#039;t do dick for paying down the debt and would just cause millionaires and billionaires to take their money to a tax-friendly country..  Just like what happened in the UK and in France...

  
&lt;I&gt; Taxes income from investments the same as income from wages&lt;/I&gt;

This one I really don&#039;t have a problem with.  But I also don&#039;t know the other side of the story, so.... 


&lt;B&gt;Fair Corporate Tax&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;Ends corporate tax bias toward moving jobs and profits overseas
    Enacts a financial transactions tax
    Reduces deductions for corporate jets, meals, and entertainment&lt;/I&gt;

Another one that really doesn&#039;t bother me much.

&lt;B&gt;Defense&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;    Returns Pentagon spending to 2006 levels, focusing on modern security needs&lt;/I&gt;

Which is it??

Focus on MODERN security needs or reduce spending to 2006 levels?

Because you sure as hell can&#039;t do both.

THIS is what happens when you have bean counters instead of soldiers deciding military matters..

 

&lt;B&gt;Health Care&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;    No benefit cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security
    Reduces health care costs by adopting a public option, negotiating drug prices, and reducing fraud&lt;/I&gt;

If fraud is so easy to reduce, why don&#039;t you do that FIRST and then come back for more money??

Duuuhhhhhh

 
&lt;B&gt;Environment&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;    Prices carbon pollution with a rebate to hold low income households harmless&lt;/I&gt;

Who was the moron that came up with THIS idea!???

&lt;I&gt;    Eliminates corporate tax subsidies for oil, gas, and coal companies&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, because $20 a gallon gas is what this country REALLY needs...


Jeezus H Chirst, what kind of idiot came up with this plan!!

ALL taxes and regulations and not ONE SINGLE SPENDING CUT in the bunch..

I gotta hand it to ya&#039;all..  Ya had me going.

Ya ALMOST had me believing that Democrats were sincerely interested in spending cuts..

But if THIS budget is a representation of what a TRUE Democrat is, then it&#039;s clear that a TRUE Democrat is living up to the quintessential definition of a Democrat..

One who loves to spend other people&#039;s money..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that I am just a simple ground-pounding knuckle drag'er who views high economic theory as some sort of voodoo magic..</p>
<p>My opinions are based on common sense...</p>
<p>Specifics:</p>
<p><b>Job Creation</b></p>
<p><i>Infrastructure -- substantially increases infrastructure investment to the level the American Society of Civil Engineers says is necessary to close our infrastructure needs gap</i></p>
<p>Sounds nice.  A good idea...</p>
<p>How is it going to be paid for??</p>
<p><i>Education -- funds school modernizations and rehiring laid-off teachers</i></p>
<p>Again.. It will take money.  Do Democrats think they can just print money??  Oh wait..  They do...</p>
<p><i>Aid to States -- closes the recession-caused gap in state budgets for two years, allowing the rehiring of cops, firefighters, and other public employees</i></p>
<p>But only to states that voted Democrat or are dominated Democrats..  Those states who are dominated by Republicans can go pound sand..  Ironically enough, most of THOSE states don't NEED any help.  :D</p>
<p><i>Making Work Pay -- boosts consumer demand by reinstating an expanded tax credit for three years</i></p>
<p>Another gimme that is paid for by American taxpayers..</p>
<p><i>Emergency Unemployment Compensation -- allows beneficiaries to claim up to 99 weeks of unemployment benefits in high-unemployment states for two years</i></p>
<p>Yea, cuz those poor lazy crackheads deserve all the help they can get...</p>
<p><i> Public Works Job Programs and Aid to Distressed Communities -- includes job programs such as a Park Improvement Corps, Student Jobs Corps, and Child Care Corps</i></p>
<p>Government jobs..  Yea, THAT's what we need more of...</p>
<p><b>Fair Individual Tax</b></p>
<p><i>Immediately allows Bush tax cuts to expire for families earning over $250K</i></p>
<p>You mean small business owners who are already paying millions to cover the new regulations and healthcare costs that Democrats have imposed.\</p>
<p>Yea..  Raise their taxes.  *THAT* will help stimulate the economy..</p>
<p><i> Higher tax rates for millionaires and billionaires (from 45% to 49%)</i></p>
<p>Which wouldn't do dick for paying down the debt and would just cause millionaires and billionaires to take their money to a tax-friendly country..  Just like what happened in the UK and in France...</p>
<p><i> Taxes income from investments the same as income from wages</i></p>
<p>This one I really don't have a problem with.  But I also don't know the other side of the story, so.... </p>
<p><b>Fair Corporate Tax</b></p>
<p><i>Ends corporate tax bias toward moving jobs and profits overseas<br />
    Enacts a financial transactions tax<br />
    Reduces deductions for corporate jets, meals, and entertainment</i></p>
<p>Another one that really doesn't bother me much.</p>
<p><b>Defense</b></p>
<p><i>    Returns Pentagon spending to 2006 levels, focusing on modern security needs</i></p>
<p>Which is it??</p>
<p>Focus on MODERN security needs or reduce spending to 2006 levels?</p>
<p>Because you sure as hell can't do both.</p>
<p>THIS is what happens when you have bean counters instead of soldiers deciding military matters..</p>
<p><b>Health Care</b></p>
<p><i>    No benefit cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security<br />
    Reduces health care costs by adopting a public option, negotiating drug prices, and reducing fraud</i></p>
<p>If fraud is so easy to reduce, why don't you do that FIRST and then come back for more money??</p>
<p>Duuuhhhhhh</p>
<p><b>Environment</b></p>
<p><i>    Prices carbon pollution with a rebate to hold low income households harmless</i></p>
<p>Who was the moron that came up with THIS idea!???</p>
<p><i>    Eliminates corporate tax subsidies for oil, gas, and coal companies</i></p>
<p>Yea, because $20 a gallon gas is what this country REALLY needs...</p>
<p>Jeezus H Chirst, what kind of idiot came up with this plan!!</p>
<p>ALL taxes and regulations and not ONE SINGLE SPENDING CUT in the bunch..</p>
<p>I gotta hand it to ya'all..  Ya had me going.</p>
<p>Ya ALMOST had me believing that Democrats were sincerely interested in spending cuts..</p>
<p>But if THIS budget is a representation of what a TRUE Democrat is, then it's clear that a TRUE Democrat is living up to the quintessential definition of a Democrat..</p>
<p>One who loves to spend other people's money..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34260</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34260</guid>
		<description>DB,

&lt;I&gt;Care to be specific?&lt;/I&gt;

Actually, I would LOVE to..  

But I must have not refreshed the page properly, because I didn&#039;t see any responses until AFTER my nomination comment above..  Which surprised me more than a little..

In any case, as I indicated, I would love to highlight the Good, the Bad and the Ugly for ya, but it will have to wait until tomorrow early AM..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DB,</p>
<p><i>Care to be specific?</i></p>
<p>Actually, I would LOVE to..  </p>
<p>But I must have not refreshed the page properly, because I didn't see any responses until AFTER my nomination comment above..  Which surprised me more than a little..</p>
<p>In any case, as I indicated, I would love to highlight the Good, the Bad and the Ugly for ya, but it will have to wait until tomorrow early AM..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34259</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34259</guid>
		<description>Hay CW....

If you haven&#039;t already decided, I have your MDDOTW winner..

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/03/15/newtown-parents-residents-blast-moore-crime-scene-photo-proposal/

What kind of sick scumbag would suggest releasing CSPs of dead children to further a political agenda!?

Personally, this makes Moore the MDDOTC winner in my book...

ANYONE who is on board with this needs their head examined..

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay CW....</p>
<p>If you haven't already decided, I have your MDDOTW winner..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/03/15/newtown-parents-residents-blast-moore-crime-scene-photo-proposal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/03/15/newtown-parents-residents-blast-moore-crime-scene-photo-proposal/</a></p>
<p>What kind of sick scumbag would suggest releasing CSPs of dead children to further a political agenda!?</p>
<p>Personally, this makes Moore the MDDOTC winner in my book...</p>
<p>ANYONE who is on board with this needs their head examined..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34257</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34257</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; In other news Rob Portman has &#039;evolved&#039; on gay marriage too. Shockingly(!) he only made this public after he was out of consideration for the VP spot: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21804506 &lt;/i&gt; 

I give Rob credit and will just leave it at that. 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> In other news Rob Portman has 'evolved' on gay marriage too. Shockingly(!) he only made this public after he was out of consideration for the VP spot: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21804506" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21804506</a> </i> </p>
<p>I give Rob credit and will just leave it at that. </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34255</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34255</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;(Only to still be called a socialist)&lt;/I&gt;

Lol yes.  This is one of the most hilarious and dumbest things I&#039;ve ever seen.  He passes a healthcare law which literally FORCES (mandates) people to hand over money to large multi-national Corporations and he&#039;s called a socialist!  LOL.  I think people need to re-consider their definition of socialist if &#039;forcing people to give money to Corporations&#039; falls under it!

In other news Rob Portman has &#039;evolved&#039; on gay marriage too.  Shockingly(!) he only made this public after he was out of consideration for the VP spot: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21804506

If all it takes is a family member becoming a victim to their horrific policies for Republicans to become civilised all you guys in the USA need now is more Republicans to have family members that are poor/ill/unemployed/uneducated/immigrants and they might change their archaic positions on all these issues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(Only to still be called a socialist)</i></p>
<p>Lol yes.  This is one of the most hilarious and dumbest things I've ever seen.  He passes a healthcare law which literally FORCES (mandates) people to hand over money to large multi-national Corporations and he's called a socialist!  LOL.  I think people need to re-consider their definition of socialist if 'forcing people to give money to Corporations' falls under it!</p>
<p>In other news Rob Portman has 'evolved' on gay marriage too.  Shockingly(!) he only made this public after he was out of consideration for the VP spot: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21804506" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21804506</a></p>
<p>If all it takes is a family member becoming a victim to their horrific policies for Republicans to become civilised all you guys in the USA need now is more Republicans to have family members that are poor/ill/unemployed/uneducated/immigrants and they might change their archaic positions on all these issues...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34254</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34254</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Why on earth would you include compromise in your STARTING POINT for negotiations? &lt;/i&gt; 

I&#039;ve been upset with this since Obama started the healthcare negotiation with the public option compromise. And then ended up on the Heritage Foundation solution. 

(Only to still be called a socialist)

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Why on earth would you include compromise in your STARTING POINT for negotiations? </i> </p>
<p>I've been upset with this since Obama started the healthcare negotiation with the public option compromise. And then ended up on the Heritage Foundation solution. </p>
<p>(Only to still be called a socialist)</p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34236</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34236</guid>
		<description>I thought my summary yesterday was pretty good for showing how lolololol the House Republicans plan was, so I&#039;ll update it today to look at the major budget proposals on the table.

This is all the budgets compared based on ratio of cuts – revenue – stimulus:

INDEPENDENT COMMISSION:
&lt;B&gt;Simpson-Bowles&lt;/B&gt; = 2 – 1 – 0

THE PARTIES:
&lt;B&gt;House Democrats&lt;/B&gt; = 1 – 2.5 – 1.5 
&lt;B&gt;Senate Democrats&lt;/B&gt; = 1 – 1 – 0.1
&lt;B&gt;House Republicans&lt;/B&gt; = 10000000000000000000000 (infinity)– 0 – 0
&lt;B&gt;Senate Republicans&lt;/B&gt; = Proposed nothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought my summary yesterday was pretty good for showing how lolololol the House Republicans plan was, so I'll update it today to look at the major budget proposals on the table.</p>
<p>This is all the budgets compared based on ratio of cuts – revenue – stimulus:</p>
<p>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION:<br />
<b>Simpson-Bowles</b> = 2 – 1 – 0</p>
<p>THE PARTIES:<br />
<b>House Democrats</b> = 1 – 2.5 – 1.5<br />
<b>Senate Democrats</b> = 1 – 1 – 0.1<br />
<b>House Republicans</b> = 10000000000000000000000 (infinity)– 0 – 0<br />
<b>Senate Republicans</b> = Proposed nothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34234</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34234</guid>
		<description>Yeh the problem (as usual with the idiot Democrats) is their lack of understanding in how to negotiate.

Republicans have made their starting point for negotiations the lunatic far right Paul Ryan budget; Democrats have made their starting point the sensible, compromise filled Senate budget.

Why on earth would you include compromise in your STARTING POINT for negotiations?  So stupid.  

They should have made their starting point the House Democrats budget.  Then you&#039;d get an ACTUAL centrist compromise, not just the usual right of centre compromise they end up agreeing to...

I think everything is moot anyway since Simpsons-Bowles would be the compromise position and Republicans have indicated they will not accept anything in the same ballpark as Simpson-Bowles.  It&#039;s the usual our way or the high-way with them.  So there will be no budget agreement.  The next point is whether or not they want to shut down Government and more up the recovery some more.  Sadly there is a good chance that they do, they are that moronic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh the problem (as usual with the idiot Democrats) is their lack of understanding in how to negotiate.</p>
<p>Republicans have made their starting point for negotiations the lunatic far right Paul Ryan budget; Democrats have made their starting point the sensible, compromise filled Senate budget.</p>
<p>Why on earth would you include compromise in your STARTING POINT for negotiations?  So stupid.  </p>
<p>They should have made their starting point the House Democrats budget.  Then you'd get an ACTUAL centrist compromise, not just the usual right of centre compromise they end up agreeing to...</p>
<p>I think everything is moot anyway since Simpsons-Bowles would be the compromise position and Republicans have indicated they will not accept anything in the same ballpark as Simpson-Bowles.  It's the usual our way or the high-way with them.  So there will be no budget agreement.  The next point is whether or not they want to shut down Government and more up the recovery some more.  Sadly there is a good chance that they do, they are that moronic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34232</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34232</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Anyway to be fair, this budget has about as much chance of getting passed as Ryan&#039;s. &lt;/i&gt; 

True. Which is a shame. 

Likely what will get passed is some kind of &quot;grand&quot; compromise- which is code for a strongly conservative budget which looks moderate next to Paul Ryan. 

I&#039;m at least hoping there&#039;s some strong investment which might help bring back the economy. 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Anyway to be fair, this budget has about as much chance of getting passed as Ryan's. </i> </p>
<p>True. Which is a shame. </p>
<p>Likely what will get passed is some kind of "grand" compromise- which is code for a strongly conservative budget which looks moderate next to Paul Ryan. </p>
<p>I'm at least hoping there's some strong investment which might help bring back the economy. </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34231</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34231</guid>
		<description>Anyway to be fair, this budget has about as much chance of getting passed as Ryan&#039;s.  

Once again if there is going to be any chance of getting something done in American politics it will come from the Senate and their compromise budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway to be fair, this budget has about as much chance of getting passed as Ryan's.  </p>
<p>Once again if there is going to be any chance of getting something done in American politics it will come from the Senate and their compromise budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34230</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34230</guid>
		<description>Only in America could a sensible plan which get so little mainstream attention.  Almost everything in the plan is universally agreed by economists as being the cornerstone for economic growth, in particular: education, infrastructure, healthcare.

And of course the number 1 way to reduce your deficit is by increasing revenue and decreasing costs.  Getting people back to work is THE BEST possible way to reduce your benefit as it does both of these as well as coming with a host of other GDP boosts (especially in a consumer spending driven economy like America).

Yet Ryan&#039;s budget gets much media attention (mostly negative because it is so lunatic) even when economists say it will cost 2 MILLION jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only in America could a sensible plan which get so little mainstream attention.  Almost everything in the plan is universally agreed by economists as being the cornerstone for economic growth, in particular: education, infrastructure, healthcare.</p>
<p>And of course the number 1 way to reduce your deficit is by increasing revenue and decreasing costs.  Getting people back to work is THE BEST possible way to reduce your benefit as it does both of these as well as coming with a host of other GDP boosts (especially in a consumer spending driven economy like America).</p>
<p>Yet Ryan's budget gets much media attention (mostly negative because it is so lunatic) even when economists say it will cost 2 MILLION jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34228</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34228</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; And David says that the BACK TO WORK Budget never gets any press.... :D &lt;/i&gt; 

Mainstream press ... :)

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;tbm=nws&amp;q=back+to+work+budget&amp;oq=back+to+work+budget

This is great, CW. If only we could vote on people for the mainstream media :)

What I like about this is the focus on job creation, education and eliminating the tax incentives to offshore jobs.  

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> And David says that the BACK TO WORK Budget never gets any press.... :D </i> </p>
<p>Mainstream press ... :)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;tbm=nws&amp;q=back+to+work+budget&amp;oq=back+to+work+budget" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;tbm=nws&amp;q=back+to+work+budget&amp;oq=back+to+work+budget</a></p>
<p>This is great, CW. If only we could vote on people for the mainstream media :)</p>
<p>What I like about this is the focus on job creation, education and eliminating the tax incentives to offshore jobs.  </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34225</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34225</guid>
		<description>Gee Michale,

&quot;But more are so whacked and ridiculous...&quot;

Care to be specific?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Michale,</p>
<p>"But more are so whacked and ridiculous..."</p>
<p>Care to be specific?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/14/the-back-to-work-budget/#comment-34220</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7081#comment-34220</guid>
		<description>And David says that the BACK TO WORK Budget never gets any press....   :D

A couple of those things actually make good sense..

But more are so whacked and ridiculous it would reduce the US to third-world status more so than Obama and the Democrats have already done...


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And David says that the BACK TO WORK Budget never gets any press....   :D</p>
<p>A couple of those things actually make good sense..</p>
<p>But more are so whacked and ridiculous it would reduce the US to third-world status more so than Obama and the Democrats have already done...</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
