<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2012 Electoral Math -- Obama Solidifies Bounce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; 2012 Electoral Math -- Debate Effects Remain To Be Seen</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27755</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; 2012 Electoral Math -- Debate Effects Remain To Be Seen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27755</guid>
		<description>[...] 2012 Electoral Math &#8212; Obama Solidifies Bounce [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2012 Electoral Math &#8212; Obama Solidifies Bounce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27557</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27557</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; Romney could have a policy to &#039;nuke every Democratic State &lt;/I&gt;

Ever read a book called THE LAST PRESIDENT???

You would like it.  :D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Romney could have a policy to 'nuke every Democratic State </i></p>
<p>Ever read a book called THE LAST PRESIDENT???</p>
<p>You would like it.  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27555</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27555</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Can Romney?&lt;/I&gt;

Well I&#039;d suggest you ask yourself that first.  But as we both know you don&#039;t give a crap about Romney&#039;s policies.  Romney could have a policy to &#039;nuke every Democratic State or &#039;sell the entire military to China to pay off the deficit&#039; and you&#039;d still vote for him because you hate Obama so much.

PS.  I kind of like the last policy a little ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Can Romney?</i></p>
<p>Well I'd suggest you ask yourself that first.  But as we both know you don't give a crap about Romney's policies.  Romney could have a policy to 'nuke every Democratic State or 'sell the entire military to China to pay off the deficit' and you'd still vote for him because you hate Obama so much.</p>
<p>PS.  I kind of like the last policy a little ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27553</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27553</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And I always see the glass half full: either America continues it&#039;s current path in world economic and social leadership or it goes on a whole other crazy path that will probably result in a another global recession and the removal of America as the world&#039;s number 1 economy. &lt;/I&gt;

I actually choose the former, but it&#039;s obvious that Obama can&#039;t deliver that..

Can Romney???

I dunno..  But, in THIS case, the devil we DON&#039;T know is infinitely preferable to the devil we DO know..


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And I always see the glass half full: either America continues it's current path in world economic and social leadership or it goes on a whole other crazy path that will probably result in a another global recession and the removal of America as the world's number 1 economy. </i></p>
<p>I actually choose the former, but it's obvious that Obama can't deliver that..</p>
<p>Can Romney???</p>
<p>I dunno..  But, in THIS case, the devil we DON'T know is infinitely preferable to the devil we DO know..</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27551</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27551</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a numbers guy.  Until the probability of Obama being elected hits 100%, which it never will until actual election day, I&#039;m always going to be prepared for the idea that something could happen and ready to adjust.

And I always see the glass half full: either America continues it&#039;s current path in world economic and social leadership or it goes on a whole other crazy path that will probably result in a another global recession and the removal of America as the world&#039;s number 1 economy.  If you choose the latter you live with the consequences!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a numbers guy.  Until the probability of Obama being elected hits 100%, which it never will until actual election day, I'm always going to be prepared for the idea that something could happen and ready to adjust.</p>
<p>And I always see the glass half full: either America continues it's current path in world economic and social leadership or it goes on a whole other crazy path that will probably result in a another global recession and the removal of America as the world's number 1 economy.  If you choose the latter you live with the consequences!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27548</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27548</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Lol not having to live in your country it wouldn&#039;t bother me too much if Romney won. I&#039;d shift my portfolio and reduce American stocks - you can ride the austerity train on your own. The way I see it if your country is stupid enough to elect this guy then quite frankly you don&#039;t deserve to be the world&#039;s no.1 super-power for much longer. And Romney will take care of that in his first term probably. The demise of America means less to me than to you guys...&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, cuz Obama has done SOOO much good for us, eh??  :D

I have to give you credit though..  At least you actually answered the question...  Most ObamaBots around here would have simply refused to even consider the possibility let alone articulate it...

So, credit where credit is due.. : D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lol not having to live in your country it wouldn't bother me too much if Romney won. I'd shift my portfolio and reduce American stocks - you can ride the austerity train on your own. The way I see it if your country is stupid enough to elect this guy then quite frankly you don't deserve to be the world's no.1 super-power for much longer. And Romney will take care of that in his first term probably. The demise of America means less to me than to you guys...</i></p>
<p>Yea, cuz Obama has done SOOO much good for us, eh??  :D</p>
<p>I have to give you credit though..  At least you actually answered the question...  Most ObamaBots around here would have simply refused to even consider the possibility let alone articulate it...</p>
<p>So, credit where credit is due.. : D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27545</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27545</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What&#039;s going to be your reaction when Romney becomes our next president?&lt;/I&gt;

Lol not having to live in your country it wouldn&#039;t bother me too much if Romney won.  I&#039;d shift my portfolio and reduce American stocks - you can ride the austerity train on your own.  The way I see it if your country is stupid enough to elect this guy then quite frankly you don&#039;t deserve to be the world&#039;s no.1 super-power for much longer.  And Romney will take care of that in his first term probably.  The demise of America means less to me than to you guys...

Of course I would like to see a solid America leading the world economically and in social standards.  But it&#039;s your country - you can choose to wreck it if you like!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What's going to be your reaction when Romney becomes our next president?</i></p>
<p>Lol not having to live in your country it wouldn't bother me too much if Romney won.  I'd shift my portfolio and reduce American stocks - you can ride the austerity train on your own.  The way I see it if your country is stupid enough to elect this guy then quite frankly you don't deserve to be the world's no.1 super-power for much longer.  And Romney will take care of that in his first term probably.  The demise of America means less to me than to you guys...</p>
<p>Of course I would like to see a solid America leading the world economically and in social standards.  But it's your country - you can choose to wreck it if you like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27541</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27541</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-John F Kennedy

http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/images/-7.img_assist_custom-640x572.png

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Ask not what you can do for your country, but what I can give you, at taxpayer&#039;s expense, to buy your vote.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Barack Obama

I mean, forget all aspects of INCOMPETENCE on Obama&#039;s part..

Obama doesn&#039;t DESERVE to be President...

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country"</b><br />
-John F Kennedy</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/images/-7.img_assist_custom-640x572.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/images/-7.img_assist_custom-640x572.png</a></p>
<p><b>"Ask not what you can do for your country, but what I can give you, at taxpayer's expense, to buy your vote."</b><br />
-Barack Obama</p>
<p>I mean, forget all aspects of INCOMPETENCE on Obama's part..</p>
<p>Obama doesn't DESERVE to be President...</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27540</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27540</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a non-Fox take on Ohio voter registration:

&lt;i&gt;Ohio has gone from an unaffiliated majority state in 2008 (54.20%) and 2007 (64.86%) to an unaffiliated blowout state in 2011: 78.51%. Both the Democratic and Republican parties have taken a hit here, but the Democrats have taken the heavier hit. What was a DEM +10.57% registration edge in 2008 and a +2.21% registration edge in 2007 is now a GOP +0.83% edge, but both parties are so in the low teens that anything is possible. This is a jump of +13.64% for the unaffiliateds over 2007 and a +24.31% shift to the affiliateds over 2008.&lt;/i&gt;
http://rosenthalswelt.blogspot.com/2011/06/complete-vr-statistics-for-june-2011.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a non-Fox take on Ohio voter registration:</p>
<p><i>Ohio has gone from an unaffiliated majority state in 2008 (54.20%) and 2007 (64.86%) to an unaffiliated blowout state in 2011: 78.51%. Both the Democratic and Republican parties have taken a hit here, but the Democrats have taken the heavier hit. What was a DEM +10.57% registration edge in 2008 and a +2.21% registration edge in 2007 is now a GOP +0.83% edge, but both parties are so in the low teens that anything is possible. This is a jump of +13.64% for the unaffiliateds over 2007 and a +24.31% shift to the affiliateds over 2008.</i><br />
<a href="http://rosenthalswelt.blogspot.com/2011/06/complete-vr-statistics-for-june-2011.html" rel="nofollow">http://rosenthalswelt.blogspot.com/2011/06/complete-vr-statistics-for-june-2011.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27538</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious, michty...

What&#039;s going to be your reaction when Romney becomes our next president??

Besides the massive ingestion of a crow-like substance??  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm curious, michty...</p>
<p>What's going to be your reaction when Romney becomes our next president??</p>
<p>Besides the massive ingestion of a crow-like substance??  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27537</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27537</guid>
		<description>ME: &lt;I&gt;Applying the definition of a toss-up State as &quot;a State which either candidate leads by &lt;2 points&quot; there are only 2 toss-up States left: North Carolina and New Hampshire. NH is also one of the least polled battleground States.&lt;/I&gt;

NH gets an Obama +7 poll today moving him to +2.5 on the average and we&#039;re down to 1 toss-up State - North Carolina!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ME: <i>Applying the definition of a toss-up State as "a State which either candidate leads by &lt;2 points&quot; there are only 2 toss-up States left: North Carolina and New Hampshire. NH is also one of the least polled battleground States.</i></p>
<p>NH gets an Obama +7 poll today moving him to +2.5 on the average and we're down to 1 toss-up State - North Carolina!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27535</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27535</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Obama is even now teasing Romney by &quot;leaking&quot; that they might open up some offices in AZ. Talk about hitting a man when he&#039;s down (snerk).&lt;/I&gt;

Meh I doubt he&#039;ll do this.  There is really no point.  Trying to get 350 EV instead of 340 is kinda pointless.  I don&#039;t think Obama is trying in Arizona or Missouri which is why he&#039;ll lose those.  He is definitely still trying in NC and has a slim lead now (still toss-up)...

Michale
&lt;I&gt;That means if President Obama performs at the levels Democrats did in the 2010 midterms with Independent&lt;/I&gt;

Lololololololololol amazing.  You actually think a Presidential election is similar to a midterm???

&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s useless to post a poll around here that DOESN&#039;T support Obama..&lt;/I&gt;

I know what you mean that biased liberal media machine Fox News is again showing Obama +5 today.  The people at Fox are in for a huge shock when their socialist President that they are propping up comes falling down...

&lt;I&gt;Even though Rasmussen was the most accurate poll taking service in 2008&lt;/I&gt;

Get this Michale: I believe Rasmussen will still be up there in the most accurate for 2012.  Unfortunately this mainly because accuracy is just measured by the last poll they release the day before the election, not the average of their entire polls...

I am wondering though: if Obama matches the results being predicted for him in the polls will this ALSO be a liberal media conspiracy?  Will it be proof the election was rigged??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Obama is even now teasing Romney by "leaking" that they might open up some offices in AZ. Talk about hitting a man when he's down (snerk).</i></p>
<p>Meh I doubt he'll do this.  There is really no point.  Trying to get 350 EV instead of 340 is kinda pointless.  I don't think Obama is trying in Arizona or Missouri which is why he'll lose those.  He is definitely still trying in NC and has a slim lead now (still toss-up)...</p>
<p>Michale<br />
<i>That means if President Obama performs at the levels Democrats did in the 2010 midterms with Independent</i></p>
<p>Lololololololololol amazing.  You actually think a Presidential election is similar to a midterm???</p>
<p><i>It's useless to post a poll around here that DOESN'T support Obama..</i></p>
<p>I know what you mean that biased liberal media machine Fox News is again showing Obama +5 today.  The people at Fox are in for a huge shock when their socialist President that they are propping up comes falling down...</p>
<p><i>Even though Rasmussen was the most accurate poll taking service in 2008</i></p>
<p>Get this Michale: I believe Rasmussen will still be up there in the most accurate for 2012.  Unfortunately this mainly because accuracy is just measured by the last poll they release the day before the election, not the average of their entire polls...</p>
<p>I am wondering though: if Obama matches the results being predicted for him in the polls will this ALSO be a liberal media conspiracy?  Will it be proof the election was rigged??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27533</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27533</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Even though Rasmussen was the most accurate poll taking service in 2008, the criteria for polls in Weigantia seems to be:&lt;/I&gt;

Did I mention that all polls are shit??  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Even though Rasmussen was the most accurate poll taking service in 2008, the criteria for polls in Weigantia seems to be:</i></p>
<p>Did I mention that all polls are shit??  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27532</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27532</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It ain&#039;t Romney who&#039;s down in Arizona: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/arizona/election_2012_arizona_president&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s useless to post a poll around here that DOESN&#039;T support Obama..

Even though Rasmussen was the most accurate poll taking service in 2008, the criteria for polls in Weigantia seems to be:

Poll Supports Obama = Dead On Ballz Accurate Poll

Poll Doesn&#039;t Support Obama = Totally skewed Right Wing Poll That Should Be Burned And Pollsters Should Be Arrested For Racist Hate Crime


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It ain't Romney who's down in Arizona: <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/arizona/election_2012_arizona_president" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/arizona/election_2012_arizona_president</a></i></p>
<p>It's useless to post a poll around here that DOESN'T support Obama..</p>
<p>Even though Rasmussen was the most accurate poll taking service in 2008, the criteria for polls in Weigantia seems to be:</p>
<p>Poll Supports Obama = Dead On Ballz Accurate Poll</p>
<p>Poll Doesn't Support Obama = Totally skewed Right Wing Poll That Should Be Burned And Pollsters Should Be Arrested For Racist Hate Crime</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27531</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27531</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;This report compiles data from Secretaries of State in each of the 8 key swing states with partisan voter registration and found striking never-before-released statistics. The number of Independents is up 3.4% in those states—while Democrats have dropped 5.4% and Republicans have fallen by 3.1%. That means 254,310 new Independent voters to woo in 2012, and 825,708 fewer Democrats. Our analysis also predicts that 2012 will see the highest turnout rate among Independents in 35 years—since Ford v. Carter in 1976. &lt;I&gt;That means if President Obama performs at the levels Democrats did in the 2010 midterms with Independents, it would spell disaster, with 5 key swing states in the loss column and the others substantially tightening, no matter how well Obama does among Democratic voters.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;
(emphasis mine)
http://www.thirdway.org/publications/470

For the record, The Third Way is a LEFT leaning Think Tank...

Shall we start marinating the Crow for the 7 Nov feast???  :D

7 Nov is going to be SUCH a fun day...  :D

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This report compiles data from Secretaries of State in each of the 8 key swing states with partisan voter registration and found striking never-before-released statistics. The number of Independents is up 3.4% in those states—while Democrats have dropped 5.4% and Republicans have fallen by 3.1%. That means 254,310 new Independent voters to woo in 2012, and 825,708 fewer Democrats. Our analysis also predicts that 2012 will see the highest turnout rate among Independents in 35 years—since Ford v. Carter in 1976. <i>That means if President Obama performs at the levels Democrats did in the 2010 midterms with Independents, it would spell disaster, with 5 key swing states in the loss column and the others substantially tightening, no matter how well Obama does among Democratic voters.</i></b><br />
(emphasis mine)<br />
<a href="http://www.thirdway.org/publications/470" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdway.org/publications/470</a></p>
<p>For the record, The Third Way is a LEFT leaning Think Tank...</p>
<p>Shall we start marinating the Crow for the 7 Nov feast???  :D</p>
<p>7 Nov is going to be SUCH a fun day...  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27529</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27529</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Don&#039;t boo, vote,&quot; President Obama often says in his stump speech whenever crowds boo a Romney plan.

The off-hand call to vote may be by design. It comes amid a precipitous decline in Democratic voter registration in key swing states -- nowhere more apparent than in Ohio.

Voter registration in the Buckeye State is down by 490,000 people from 4 years ago. Of that reduction,. 44 percent is in Cleveland and surrounding Cuyahoga County, where Democrats outnumber Republicans more than two to one.&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/27/drop-in-ohio-voter-registration-especially-in-dem-strongholds-mirrors/#ixzz27l3V19ep&lt;/I&gt;

If I were Democrats, I would be VERY worried..

But, of course, they&#039;re not...   

http://tinyurl.com/85qsefo

:D

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Don't boo, vote," President Obama often says in his stump speech whenever crowds boo a Romney plan.</p>
<p>The off-hand call to vote may be by design. It comes amid a precipitous decline in Democratic voter registration in key swing states -- nowhere more apparent than in Ohio.</p>
<p>Voter registration in the Buckeye State is down by 490,000 people from 4 years ago. Of that reduction,. 44 percent is in Cleveland and surrounding Cuyahoga County, where Democrats outnumber Republicans more than two to one.</b></p>
<p><i>foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/27/drop-in-ohio-voter-registration-especially-in-dem-strongholds-mirrors/#ixzz27l3V19ep</i></p>
<p>If I were Democrats, I would be VERY worried..</p>
<p>But, of course, they're not...   </p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/85qsefo" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/85qsefo</a></p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27528</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27528</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I get the funny feeling that a lot of these pollsters are using 2008 models, like they&#039;re expecting the same immense turnout that O got the last time. I really don&#039;t see that happening. I don&#039;t see tons of &quot;yutes&quot; turning out again, for starters.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, Dems are really going to be in for a shock on 7 Nov....

They are trying to relive the hey days of 2008, but they are going to have a rude awakening when they discover that it&#039;s going to be 2010 on steroids...   :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I get the funny feeling that a lot of these pollsters are using 2008 models, like they're expecting the same immense turnout that O got the last time. I really don't see that happening. I don't see tons of "yutes" turning out again, for starters.</i></p>
<p>Yea, Dems are really going to be in for a shock on 7 Nov....</p>
<p>They are trying to relive the hey days of 2008, but they are going to have a rude awakening when they discover that it's going to be 2010 on steroids...   :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris1962</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27525</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris1962</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27525</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Also, I&#039;ve been possessive-izing names wrong when they end in &quot;s&quot; -- which is not Chris&#039; fault but most definitely now is Chris&#039;s fault.&lt;/i&gt;

:::snicker::: Now it&#039;s gonna drive you crazy every time you see that mistake made by a journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Also, I've been possessive-izing names wrong when they end in "s" -- which is not Chris' fault but most definitely now is Chris's fault.</i></p>
<p>:::snicker::: Now it's gonna drive you crazy every time you see that mistake made by a journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27524</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 03:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27524</guid>
		<description>David,

I feel your pain ... I really, really do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I feel your pain ... I really, really do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris1962</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27522</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris1962</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 03:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27522</guid>
		<description>LOL! I read somewhere, today, that voter registration for Dems is waaaaaaaaaay down in some of the critical swing states.  

I get the funny feeling that a lot of these pollsters are using 2008 models, like they&#039;re expecting the same immense turnout that O got the last time. I really don&#039;t see that happening. I don&#039;t see tons of &quot;yutes&quot; turning out again, for starters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! I read somewhere, today, that voter registration for Dems is waaaaaaaaaay down in some of the critical swing states.  </p>
<p>I get the funny feeling that a lot of these pollsters are using 2008 models, like they're expecting the same immense turnout that O got the last time. I really don't see that happening. I don't see tons of "yutes" turning out again, for starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27519</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27519</guid>
		<description>CB,

Shhhhhhhhhhh

We are at war with Eurasia....

We have always been at way with Eurasia.....

Don&#039;t upset the Liberals....  :D

Like I said, iddn&#039;t it ironic that it would be the DEMOCRATS who ushered in 1984....   :D

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CB,</p>
<p>Shhhhhhhhhhh</p>
<p>We are at war with Eurasia....</p>
<p>We have always been at way with Eurasia.....</p>
<p>Don't upset the Liberals....  :D</p>
<p>Like I said, iddn't it ironic that it would be the DEMOCRATS who ushered in 1984....   :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris1962</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27518</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris1962</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27518</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Obama is even now teasing Romney by &quot;leaking&quot; that they might open up some offices in AZ. Talk about hitting a man when he&#039;s down (snerk).&lt;/i&gt;

It ain&#039;t Romney who&#039;s down in Arizona: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/arizona/election_2012_arizona_president</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Obama is even now teasing Romney by "leaking" that they might open up some offices in AZ. Talk about hitting a man when he's down (snerk).</i></p>
<p>It ain't Romney who's down in Arizona: <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/arizona/election_2012_arizona_president" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/arizona/election_2012_arizona_president</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27516</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27516</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder if ya&#039;all would be as flippant if this lady said the same thing about Romney..

No, actually, I don&#039;t have to wonder..  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder if ya'all would be as flippant if this lady said the same thing about Romney..</p>
<p>No, actually, I don't have to wonder..  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27515</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27515</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Obama&#039;s giving out phones? Sign me up! &lt;/I&gt;

Wow... Yer easy...  :D

I would hold out at LEAST until Obama offers to pay your mortgage...  :D


Michale....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Obama's giving out phones? Sign me up! </i></p>
<p>Wow... Yer easy...  :D</p>
<p>I would hold out at LEAST until Obama offers to pay your mortgage...  :D</p>
<p>Michale....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27512</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27512</guid>
		<description>We&#039;d like to welcome &quot;Chris Weigant&quot; as a new commenter.  Your first comment was held for moderation, and you should now be able to post instantly...

Heh.  OK, sorry folks, I am beginning to emerge from a week spent in the darkest depths of Style Guide Mordor, otherwise known as &quot;how to properly write citations of other works in footnotes and endnotes.&quot;

I have learned many new and wond&#039;rous things.  Well, maybe not -- &quot;new&quot; is true, at any rate.  Such as &quot;s.v.&quot; is the abbreviation for &lt;em&gt;sub verbo&lt;/em&gt;.  Why is this important, you wonder?  Well, mostly it&#039;s not, unless you have to cite a dictionary.  Say you use &quot;of course, the dictionary definition is...&quot; or &quot;Webster&#039;s says...&quot; in your writing.  When citing it, you don&#039;t cite the page number, but rather the word (For instance: Webster&#039;s Third Edition, NYC, 2012, s.v. &quot;quatloo&quot;).  

Also, I&#039;ve been possessive-izing names wrong when they end in &quot;s&quot; -- which is not Chris&#039; fault but most definitely now is Chris&#039;s fault.

What else?  Page numbers now exist on their own, without &quot;p.&quot; or &quot;pp.&quot; to introduce them.

Sigh.  Is anyone falling asleep?  Sorry, I&#039;m beginning to bore even myself.  So you can see what kind of week it&#039;s been.  I&#039;m almost done, and so I&#039;m playing hooky and answering blog comments, which I have again become shamefully lax at doing.

akadjian [1] -

OK, now THAT was funny!

:-)

michty6 [2] -

Obama is even now teasing Romney by &quot;leaking&quot; that they might open up some offices in AZ.  Talk about hitting a man when he&#039;s down (snerk).

David [4] -

Isn&#039;t that &quot;National Popular Vote&quot;?  It should have the same effect on TV commercials...

michty6 [5] -

Search out &quot;Saturday Night Live sketch undecided voters&quot; if you want a laugh...

David [8] -

Search out &quot;Samuel Jackson WTFU ad&quot;.  Heh.  Now THAT&#039;S a funny ad!

OK, that&#039;s it for now... they don&#039;t seem to be handing out Obamaphones around here...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to welcome "Chris Weigant" as a new commenter.  Your first comment was held for moderation, and you should now be able to post instantly...</p>
<p>Heh.  OK, sorry folks, I am beginning to emerge from a week spent in the darkest depths of Style Guide Mordor, otherwise known as "how to properly write citations of other works in footnotes and endnotes."</p>
<p>I have learned many new and wond'rous things.  Well, maybe not -- "new" is true, at any rate.  Such as "s.v." is the abbreviation for <em>sub verbo</em>.  Why is this important, you wonder?  Well, mostly it's not, unless you have to cite a dictionary.  Say you use "of course, the dictionary definition is..." or "Webster's says..." in your writing.  When citing it, you don't cite the page number, but rather the word (For instance: Webster's Third Edition, NYC, 2012, s.v. "quatloo").  </p>
<p>Also, I've been possessive-izing names wrong when they end in "s" -- which is not Chris' fault but most definitely now is Chris's fault.</p>
<p>What else?  Page numbers now exist on their own, without "p." or "pp." to introduce them.</p>
<p>Sigh.  Is anyone falling asleep?  Sorry, I'm beginning to bore even myself.  So you can see what kind of week it's been.  I'm almost done, and so I'm playing hooky and answering blog comments, which I have again become shamefully lax at doing.</p>
<p>akadjian [1] -</p>
<p>OK, now THAT was funny!</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>michty6 [2] -</p>
<p>Obama is even now teasing Romney by "leaking" that they might open up some offices in AZ.  Talk about hitting a man when he's down (snerk).</p>
<p>David [4] -</p>
<p>Isn't that "National Popular Vote"?  It should have the same effect on TV commercials...</p>
<p>michty6 [5] -</p>
<p>Search out "Saturday Night Live sketch undecided voters" if you want a laugh...</p>
<p>David [8] -</p>
<p>Search out "Samuel Jackson WTFU ad".  Heh.  Now THAT'S a funny ad!</p>
<p>OK, that's it for now... they don't seem to be handing out Obamaphones around here...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27509</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27509</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Those people WILL vote for Obama regardless.. They don&#039;t want their sugar train to derail&lt;/I&gt;

Lol I&#039;d love to take a tour of Michale-world one day.  You do know who &#039;those people&#039; are?  

Don&#039;t make me have to hit you with facts again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Those people WILL vote for Obama regardless.. They don't want their sugar train to derail</i></p>
<p>Lol I'd love to take a tour of Michale-world one day.  You do know who 'those people' are?  </p>
<p>Don't make me have to hit you with facts again...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27508</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27508</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Did you see the YouTube of that lady, &quot;Obama gave me a phone!!! He&#039;s got my vote!!!&quot; &lt;/i&gt; 

Obama&#039;s giving out phones? Sign me up! 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Did you see the YouTube of that lady, "Obama gave me a phone!!! He's got my vote!!!" </i> </p>
<p>Obama's giving out phones? Sign me up! </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27507</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27507</guid>
		<description>As far as Romney saying &quot;It&#039;s not my job to worry about them&quot;, he was saying that in the context of, &quot;They are going to vote for Obama no matter what&quot;

But, I think you already knew that..  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as Romney saying "It's not my job to worry about them", he was saying that in the context of, "They are going to vote for Obama no matter what"</p>
<p>But, I think you already knew that..  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27506</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27506</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Sorry, Michale ... don&#039;t watch if you don&#039;t want to get angry.&lt;/I&gt;

Why would I get angry??

Everything Romney said was absolutely true.

Those people WILL vote for Obama regardless..  They don&#039;t want their sugar train to derail..

Did you see the YouTube of that lady, &quot;Obama gave me a phone!!!  He&#039;s got my vote!!!&quot;

That&#039;s the ONLY way that Obama can GET votes.. 

He has to BUY them...

Pretty pathetic, if you ask me..

Did you ask me??? Or were you just makin&#039; chit chat??  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sorry, Michale ... don't watch if you don't want to get angry.</i></p>
<p>Why would I get angry??</p>
<p>Everything Romney said was absolutely true.</p>
<p>Those people WILL vote for Obama regardless..  They don't want their sugar train to derail..</p>
<p>Did you see the YouTube of that lady, "Obama gave me a phone!!!  He's got my vote!!!"</p>
<p>That's the ONLY way that Obama can GET votes.. </p>
<p>He has to BUY them...</p>
<p>Pretty pathetic, if you ask me..</p>
<p>Did you ask me??? Or were you just makin' chit chat??  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27503</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27503</guid>
		<description>Though I do have to say this could be one of the best political ads ever ... 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9xCCaseop4&amp;feature=player_embedded

Sorry, Michale ... don&#039;t watch if you don&#039;t want to get angry.

Why I think it will be an effective ad is because it is simply Mitt Romney speaking. It&#039;s not the usual unnamed scary voice trying to fill you with fear. 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I do have to say this could be one of the best political ads ever ... </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9xCCaseop4&amp;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9xCCaseop4&amp;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
<p>Sorry, Michale ... don't watch if you don't want to get angry.</p>
<p>Why I think it will be an effective ad is because it is simply Mitt Romney speaking. It's not the usual unnamed scary voice trying to fill you with fear. </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27502</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27502</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;- Screw Obama and Romney I&#039;m voting Cam from Modern Family! &lt;/I&gt;

Considering that he&#039;s dating Charlize Theron (an African American no less!!) Cam gets MY vote too!!!  :D


Michale......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>- Screw Obama and Romney I'm voting Cam from Modern Family! </i></p>
<p>Considering that he's dating Charlize Theron (an African American no less!!) Cam gets MY vote too!!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27496</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27496</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; - Screw Obama and Romney I&#039;m voting Cam from Modern Family! &lt;/i&gt; 

LOL ... this is what I think it&#039;s like for everyone. 

The interesting thing is that w/ ad levels at saturation point, this might actually impact their effectiveness. 

All I think anyone hears is blah, blah, blah ... 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> - Screw Obama and Romney I'm voting Cam from Modern Family! </i> </p>
<p>LOL ... this is what I think it's like for everyone. </p>
<p>The interesting thing is that w/ ad levels at saturation point, this might actually impact their effectiveness. </p>
<p>All I think anyone hears is blah, blah, blah ... </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27494</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27494</guid>
		<description>David,
&lt;I&gt;But I don&#039;t think people in non-swing states understand the barrage we&#039;re under. Literally, all of the commercials between shows will be political ads.

Every ... one ...&lt;/I&gt;

I can only imagine what it must be like for the clueless undecideds:
- OMG Obama is evil, I love Romney!
- Romney did what?!  Screw him I love Obama!
- Obama is a socialist??  No way!  I&#039;m voting Romney!
- Oh wait Romney doesn&#039;t care about the poor.  I&#039;m voting Obama!
- Screw Obama and Romney I&#039;m voting Cam from Modern Family!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
<i>But I don't think people in non-swing states understand the barrage we're under. Literally, all of the commercials between shows will be political ads.</p>
<p>Every ... one ...</i></p>
<p>I can only imagine what it must be like for the clueless undecideds:<br />
- OMG Obama is evil, I love Romney!<br />
- Romney did what?!  Screw him I love Obama!<br />
- Obama is a socialist??  No way!  I'm voting Romney!<br />
- Oh wait Romney doesn't care about the poor.  I'm voting Obama!<br />
- Screw Obama and Romney I'm voting Cam from Modern Family!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27491</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27491</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Feeling a little stressed out??? :D &lt;/i&gt; 

Fortunately I don&#039;t watch much TV ... 

But I don&#039;t think people in non-swing states understand the barrage we&#039;re under. Literally, all of the commercials between shows will be political ads. 

Every ... one ...  

I think legislation should be introduced which makes all ads equal in all states so that if we have to be subjected to this crap, everyone should 

:)

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Feeling a little stressed out??? :D </i> </p>
<p>Fortunately I don't watch much TV ... </p>
<p>But I don't think people in non-swing states understand the barrage we're under. Literally, all of the commercials between shows will be political ads. </p>
<p>Every ... one ...  </p>
<p>I think legislation should be introduced which makes all ads equal in all states so that if we have to be subjected to this crap, everyone should </p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27488</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27488</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Could we just hold this next Tuesday so we could end the barrage of campaign ads? &lt;/I&gt;

Feeling a little stressed out???  :D

Thank the gods we don&#039;t see commercials here.  It would probably drive me ape-sheet..  

I&#039;de be throwing stuff at the TV left and right..  

Literally.. Left AND Right..  :D

Michale....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Could we just hold this next Tuesday so we could end the barrage of campaign ads? </i></p>
<p>Feeling a little stressed out???  :D</p>
<p>Thank the gods we don't see commercials here.  It would probably drive me ape-sheet..  </p>
<p>I'de be throwing stuff at the TV left and right..  </p>
<p>Literally.. Left AND Right..  :D</p>
<p>Michale....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michty6</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27482</link>
		<dc:creator>michty6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27482</guid>
		<description>Applying the definition of a toss-up State as &quot;a State which either candidate leads by &lt;2 points&quot; there are only 2 toss-up States left: North Carolina and New Hampshire.  NH is also one of the least polled battleground States.

Every other battleground is now solidly leaning Obama.  Colorado and Florida are closest to moving back to toss-up.  Arizona and Missouri are indeed moving the wrong way for Romney but there is not enough polling data to confirm this shift.

A couple of Florida polls actually showed Romney losing the elderly vote, which must have been a concern of his/target of Obama&#039;s after his selection of Ryan.  If this holds true he is doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applying the definition of a toss-up State as "a State which either candidate leads by &lt;2 points&quot; there are only 2 toss-up States left: North Carolina and New Hampshire.  NH is also one of the least polled battleground States.</p>
<p>Every other battleground is now solidly leaning Obama.  Colorado and Florida are closest to moving back to toss-up.  Arizona and Missouri are indeed moving the wrong way for Romney but there is not enough polling data to confirm this shift.</p>
<p>A couple of Florida polls actually showed Romney losing the elderly vote, which must have been a concern of his/target of Obama&#039;s after his selection of Ryan.  If this holds true he is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/26/2012-electoral-math-obama-solidifies-bounce/#comment-27479</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6301#comment-27479</guid>
		<description>Could we just hold this next Tuesday so we could end the barrage of campaign ads? 

Sincerely, 
Ohio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could we just hold this next Tuesday so we could end the barrage of campaign ads? </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Ohio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
