Now I know you are whacked....

You have been denying it was a terrorist attack SINCE the attack...

Put down the crack pipe, michty.. You've had too much already....

Michale......

Even the animals don't like Obama!!!! :D

hehehehehehehehehehe

How funny is that!!??? :D

Michale

Lol nope. I don't know who you were arguing with in Michale-world but at no point have I denied that it was a terrorist attack. You really need to brush up on your reading skills. It's like debating a 5 year old who is just learning to read...

Up until very recently, you refused to concede that it was, indeed, a terrorist attack..

Hence, all the supporting evidence...

Jesus, I feel like I am lecturing a JEEP....

Michale.....

You REALLY are slow today, aren't you??

Here's been my links posted in this thread..

sjfm.us
chrisweigant.com
gallup.com
blogs.wsj.com
foreignpolicy.com
dispatch.com
politico.com
ap.org
whitehousedossieur.com

and THREE foxnews.com links..

This is why it's impossible to have a legitimate conversation with you..

When you're wrong (which is pretty much all the time) you simply make shit up...

Michale.....

You mean when I said yes it was a terrorist attack is evidence of me saying it wasn't a terrorist attack?!? Lololol. You are amazing! I haven't once said it wasn't a terrorist attack. The only thing we're arguing about is whether or not it was a spontaneous or planned terrorist attack/based on a protest or not...

You need to get your head out of Fox News ass and start reading a wider range of news. Almost every single thing you've quoted in this thread has been from Fox...

Apparently, it's perfectly acceptable to the White House to mock, ridicule and denigrate Christian beliefs...

But post a picture of Allah?? The White House spends 70K of tax payer money to apologize for it...

Gods, I can't wait til this clown is out of the White House...

Michale.....

Yesterday evening Obama was still saying the attacks were the result of the video...

Like I said, apparently he's the ONLY one in his Administration who still thinks the video is responsible...

Michale.....

How hilarious...

A few hours ago, you were arguing JUST the opposite!! :D

Like I said, you have your head so far up Obama's ass, it's impossible to know where you end and he begins.. :D

Michale......

Apparently, Obama is the only one in the Obama Administration who DOESN'T know that Libya was a terrorist attack....

:^/

Michale...

And I'm still lost. I'd love to know what this moronic religion is that preaches violence? Al-Quedaism?

If you are still watching this thread...

If I posted a picture of the muslim god ALLAH on your website, would you take it down??

Don't worry, I won't..

But I was curious as to what your reaction to be.

I am sure I can guess pretty close your ideals on censorship and freedom of expression and the like..

So, I was just curious as to how you would approach such an issue...

Michale.....

If that were true, then Obama (and you) would stop right there..

But, mentioning the video alongside the violence Obama (and you) are equating the two.. Obama (and you) are saying that one is equally bad as the other.

By even ADDRESSING the video in the same context of the rioting, Obama (and you) are condoning and justifying the violence..

I think they are both ridiculous but the latter is definitely waaay worse of course. I'd love to know precisely what religion this is? Because there are none that teach this as far as I'm aware.

Ask Daniel Pearl what religion it is.

Ask Nicholas Berg what religion it is..

Up until now, you have been amusing..

Now, you're just disgusting...

Michale.....

Is there a better way to stop the attacks?

There are several ways to stop the attacks..

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/21/muhammad-cartoon-day/

That's one...

My preferred way is to simply answer their level of violence with OUR own level of violence..

Savages start burning and pillaging, we start cuffin' and stuffin'...

They start raping and murdering, we start gunning them down..

You would think that YOU, being a Briton, would understand that appeasement NEVER works...

All appeasement does is invite more and escalating violence...

Michale.....

It shows that Obama cares more for the feelings of brutal savages then he does about Americans.

Loloololol. Amazing. I would love to know how your logic works. Yes Obama released a video saying how the administration had nothing to do with the moronic film and Michale logic dictates this means he loves terrorists and hates America lololol. Must have been the part where he said "There is absolutely no justification to this senseless violence. None." Yup he is backing the savages for sure (in Michale world).

Do you think that the violence that has resulted in this video is excusable or justified or mitigated?

I agree with Obama's statement in his ad: There is absolutely no justification to this senseless violence. None. On the scale of moronic craziness there are sensible people (level 1), this video maker (level 2) and the violent protestors/terrorists (level 1000)

A religion that teaches that man walked with dinosaurs?

Or a religion that teaches it's OK to cut off someone's head if someone else draws a picture of god?

I think they are both ridiculous but the latter is definitely waaay worse of course. I'd love to know precisely what religion this is? Because there are none that teach this as far as I'm aware.

If you are still watching this thread...

Lemme ask you something...

If I posted a picture of the muslim god ALLAH on your website, would you take it down??

Michale.....

Or a religion that teaches it's OK to cut off someone's head if someone else draws a picture of god??

Careful with this one. It might be a 'trick' question.... :D

Michale.....

What do you think is more ridiculous..

A religion that teaches that man walked with dinosaurs?

Or a religion that teaches it's OK to cut off someone's head if someone else draws a picture of god??

Michale.....

Simple... It's appeasement to muslims and says absolutely NOTHING to our 1st Amendment..

It shows that Obama cares more for the feelings of brutal savages then he does about Americans.

Let me ask you this...

Do you think that the violence that has resulted in this video is excusable or justified or mitigated???

Michale..

Looks like Obama is more committed to appeasement than he is to the First Amendment...

I wish I could say I was surprised...

It's amazing how silent Liberals are on this...

Simply AMAZING....

Michale.....

"Laugh it up, fuzzball"
-Han Solo

:D

By all means.. It's simply going to make MY laugh on 7 Nov so much sweeter :D

Michale.....

Hear that, Lefties?? No more denigrating, ridiculing, mocking or attacking ANY religion..

Emperor Barack The First has decreed....

Michale.....

Terrorist attack: NOUN. A surprise attack involving the deliberate use of violence against civilians in the hope of attaining political or religious aims

Would you like to discuss what the definition of "IS" is???

Jeesus.... This is the problem discussing things with Lefties. When they facts are against them, they argue semantics...

So far the evidence says no, but an investigation should get to the bottom of this. So my answer is: don't know since the evidence available isn't enough and is subject to media bias.

So, in other words, you lied above when you said you were conceding the point..

There is PLENTY of evidence to show this was a planned attack.. You just refuse to acknowledge..

Do you know of any other "spontaneous protest" that people bring rocket launchers and top secret intel???

Yer REALLY reaching here, michty. As I am sure most everyone here would say, if they weren't so scared of being seen agreeing with He Who Shall Not Be Named... :D

To which my answer is yes. Almost all evidence clearly points to this conclusion.

EXCEPT for the evidence that doesn't.. :D Once again, you prove you simply ignore evidence that doesn't support your fantasy..

There is as much evidence to support the conclusion that there WASN'T any demonstration at all.. Even Ninjaf conceded that point..

So, I guess you are not ready to concede the Benghazi point..

Michale.....

Michale.....

Based on the available evidence, was there a terrorist attack??

Based on most definitions of 'terrorist attack', then clearly yes:

Terrorist attack: NOUN. A surprise attack involving the deliberate use of violence against civilians in the hope of attaining political or religious aims

Based on the available evidence, was the attack pre-planned??

So far the evidence says no, but an investigation should get to the bottom of this. So my answer is: don't know since the evidence available isn't enough and is subject to media bias.

You forgot:

Based on the available evidence, was there a protest before the terrorist attack

To which my answer is yes. Almost all evidence clearly points to this conclusion.

Jesus h christ!! Talk about a dysfunctional administration!!!

Michale....

That's an evasion, not a concession.

Based on the available evidence, was there a terrorist attack??

Yes or no..

Based on the available evidence, was the attack pre-planned??

Yes or no..

Until you can answer, you haven't conceded anything...

since Ninjaf and I are awaiting the official investigation

Ya'all weren't waiting on the official investigation when ya'all swore up and down that, like the Obama Administration said, that it was a "spontaneous demonstration"..

Only when the facts against your opinion started piling up, then and ONLY then, did you want to "wait for the official investigation"..

I can see right thru you.. :D

Once you concede the points, we can move on.. :D

Michale.....

Sure there's a video. And, sure, other protests were likely caused by that video.

But we're not talking about other protests.

We're discussing what went down in Benghazi.. Now, if you want to concede that discussion and move on to the protests and the video, I am all for it.

BELIEVE ME, I *want* to have that discussion. :D

But let's finish Benghazi first....

Michale....

Out of curiosity, because I'm intrigued to see how far down the rabbit hole you've gone, do you believe that this video exists? If so, do you believe that protests in Africa/Asia happened as a result of this video?

I'm genuinely curious as I think I might know what the answer is...

Michale.....

Since when do we, as a CIVILIZED SOCIETY allow, validate and condone rape and murder simply because someone was offended??

The most clueless Foreign Policy Administration ever...

OK, OK.. Maybe a stretch. But it is undeniable.. Obama really scroooed the pooch on this Libya fiasco...

No wonder his foreign policy numbers have plummeted..

Michale.....

Michale....

Most transparent Administration, my left arse cheek!!!

Michale.....

Can I quote you on that?? :D

Because it seems a LOT of people here in Weigantia like to (vis a vis the Presidential Race) quote national polls when the national polls say what they want to hear and then ignore the national polls when the national polls say something they don't like..

I'm just sayin' :D

Michale.....

Apparently not. :D

The Prosecution rests.. :D

Michale...

Thought ya got eaten by a Mugato!! :D

Haven't heard much about how Obama is "so divisive" recently, have we? Guess both sides "divide" America up, eh?

Yea, well... Obama started it!! :D

Ninjaf,

Since you are at least being reasonable about things, let's look at this from a different angle..

We have eyewitness reports that there wasn't a protest/demonstration and we have eyewitness reports that there WAS a protest/demonstration..

So, the existence or non-existent of the protest/demonstration is not hard fact. A conclusion could be drawn for either position..

But here's the question that no one has answered yet.

What evidence is there to show that the protest/demonstration (IF it existed) was "spontaneous"??

There has been absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support the Obama Administration's initial conclusion. The conclusion that they ran with, even before the smoke had cleared from Benghazi...

What is the evidence that supports a "spontaneous" protest???

It's well-established and beyond doubt or debate that the attack on the Consulate and Safe House was a planned attack...

Given my expertise in the field, it's easy for me to forumlate a plan where the initial steps would include a pre-made, ready-to-go Anti-American demonstration.

So here's the question. Is there ANY *evidence* to support the conclusion that this was a "SPONTANEOUS" protest/demonstration and not the opening salvo of the attack??

I am not being facetious here. If there IS evidence, I would like to examine it. See if it fits...

But until such evidence surfaces, it appears that the Obama Admin simply lied to pursue a political agenda..

And I know how much ya'all just HATE when a President does that, right??? :D

Michale.....

First, a general comment to Michale -

Haven't heard much about how Obama is "so divisive" recently, have we? Guess both sides "divide" America up, eh?

LizM [7] -

I know, I've got about 500 email messages to dig through, I'll get to it... finally feeling 100% again, and during being sick I did indeed just ignore email for a while. Mea culpa!

michty6 [16] -

These are facts worth bringing up over and over again. Good job! The "welfare states" are the GOP stronghold -- maybe the Dems should propose a "end welfare states" bill, eh?

Michale [18] -

Pure fantasy. His quote wasn't even close to what you claim.

michty6 [25] -

OK, I have to admit, "one foul swoop" was pretty catchy! Well done!

:-)

Michale [35] -

From the polls I see, Obama's doing just fine. His job approval number is even approaching 50% -- first time that's happened since Bin Laden was killed. O's "bounce" seems pretty solid at this point.

Michale [42] -

So is a wounded vet a "loser of society who thinks government owes him a living"? Do tell, since they're part of that 47%...

Chris1962 [62] -

National polling is all but meaningless. In the states -- where it counts -- the race is nowhere near as as close. O's shown a solid lead the entire race. I guess that qualifies as "tediously boring"...

Heh. I already asked you "worried yet?" over at HuffPost, so I will refrain from doing so here.

:-)

LizM [66] -

Reminds me of a friend who would decide every once in a while that he "had an eye problem... just can't SEE going in to work today." Heh.

OK, the rest of these comments isn't worth commenting on, for the most part. Gotta get back to work...

-CW

Don't be silly there is clearly no need for an investigation - Michale has already figured it out!

If only the intelligence community had Michale's amazing ability to apply completely unbiased logic to every situation they wouldn't even need the expense of appointing an independent body to investigate this attack. But, alas, they do not have someone with the internet-investigative capabilities of Michale, and his amazing ability to read and repeat Fox News, so they're going to waste so much time and effort on this investigation.

True or False??
I have provided several links showing this to be false. FWIW, so have you.

Something, apparently, the Obama Administration DID NOT DO, before they started spouting off about alleged protests and demonstrations..

True or False??

Michale.....

"Ned, I would love to stay here and chat with you. Buuut I'm not gonna..."
-Bill Murray, GROUNDHOG DAY

:D

Michale.....

They would IF we discussed something FROM that 46%... :D

As for my sources, I am not going to get into debating legitimacy of the FACTS they present. CBS News does not have a liberal bias — they have a factual bias

Bush National Guard papers..

'nuff said.. :D

And, yes, Rachel Maddow makes no bones about her political leanings. But knowing that and viewing the FACTS presented with that knowledge does not negate whether or not the facts are TRUE.
Fox News does not get the same benefit of the doubt because they deny their bias. If they lie about their political agenda, why would they even hesitate to cherry pick and distort the information they are offering up as fact?

Everything you say against FNC is true of Rachael Maddow, CBS and all the other Left Wing MSM outlets.

Of course, you deny this because you AGREE with their bias...

Such is the case with political ideologues.. The ones that swear fealty and allegiance to one Party or another..

It's not a malady that I suffer from.. I am free to castigate either Party as I see fit...

Ya'all fail to remember that when you label me biased. For your label to be accurate, you would have to ignore 30%-40% of my posts.

Of course, ignoring facts is what michty does best..

Apparently, he is a bad influence on you.. :D

Michale...

And your video from CBS does not answer the question but says there are eyewitnesses saying there were no protests. So, we have eyewitnesses who say there were protests. And we have eyewitnesses saying there were no protests. Hey! Let's do an investigation!

As for my sources, I am not going to get into debating legitimacy of the FACTS they present. CBS News does not have a liberal bias — they have a factual bias. And, yes, Rachel Maddow makes no bones about her political leanings. But knowing that and viewing the FACTS presented with that knowledge does not negate whether or not the facts are TRUE.
Fox News does not get the same benefit of the doubt because they deny their bias. If they lie about their political agenda, why would they even hesitate to cherry pick and distort the information they are offering up as fact?

Once again, you ignore the inconvenient facts..

That survey ALSO showed that I was 46% in agreement with Obama...

You lost, michty. Accept it gracefully...

Michale.....

It is you who then went off on a completely biased/bigoted rant about the nature of the attack. All I have merely done is point out that the evidence says one thing and you are completely bigoted and biased - a conclusion that becomes more apparent with every post you write.

'Registered NPA' means absolutely nothing when you are as biased/bigoted as you. Heck you have even posted a link showing that you took a survey which showed you agreed 95% with Mitt Romney. Hardly NPA. I could join the Republican party if I wanted to, but that wouldn't make me a Republican. You are about as much an NPA as Mitt Romney is.

Even if that were true (it isn't) it's simply the converse of your arguments

it's the Republicans' fault, Republicans are evil, Republicans are responsible, Republicans are covering it up, anything that supports Republicans is a lie, anything against Republicans is the total truth. Yawn.

You are the one who worships the almighty -D... I am a registered NPA and I have the paperwork to prove it. :D

Michale.....

Michale.....

TRANSLATION: I have no facts to back up my position, but I have to cover my embarrassment by childish and immature accusations...

's OK, michty.. You did give me a decent run, I'll grant you....

But your biggest mistake was trying to match me on a subject that I am an expert in...

Michale.....

Your evidence that is CURRENT, is NOT from your lord god, Obama and shows there WAS a protest????

......{{{chhhrrriiiiiiippppp}}} {{{chirrrrpppp}}}

That's what I thought...

I have to give you credit, though.. Your ability to deny reality is breathtaking.. Breathtakingly moronic, but breathtaking, nonetheless...

:D

Michale.....

This was a planned terrorist attack. This is documented as fact.

Don't you realise that when Michale states something it instantly becomes fact!?

"Witnesses tell CBS NEWS that there was *never* an anti-American protest outside of the consulate."

Now, since CBS News reports has been introduced as evidence, there shouldn't be ANY problem in accepting this report...

Right????

Once again...

There was NO protest/demonstration outside the US Consulate in Benghazi..

I was right. Ya'all and Obama et al were wrong.

The Obama Administration began changing their story, *12 HOURS* just as I predicted they would...

Com'on guys.. Show a little maturity and just admit it....

Ya'all were wrong...

Michale.....

Now, I am a Law And Order kinda guy.. So maybe I am biased..

JUDGE: "How could you gun down dozens of people and rape and burn and pillage!!? I am going to sentence you to a million years in jail!!!"

Radical Muslim: "Because someone on the other side of the planet offended my religion."

JUDGE: "Oh! I didn't know!! My sincerest and humblest apologies! You are free to go."

THAT is the state of this planet...

Since when do we, as a CIVILIZED SOCIETY, allow, validate and condone rape and murder simply because someone was offended??

Michale.....

In the michty/ninjaf reality, Al Qaeda will setup up a terrorist attack, plan it to the nth detail, complete with a two pronged attack using top secret intel, everything planned to the most exquisite detail possible and THEN.....

They'll wait around for a "spontaneous" protest to develop so that the can launch their attack. They'll be ALL set up on 8 Sep and.... "OK boys, no protest today. Pack it up and we'll set it all up again for tomorrow...

Com'on... I am positive that you (ninjaf) are NOT that stoopid.. Mitchy?? Jury's still out on that one..

This was a planned terrorist attack. This is documented as fact. Knowing the terrorist mentality as I do, I am certain that the protest/demonstration (if there even was one. There are conflicting eyewitness reports on that point) the alleged protest/demonstration was initiated by the attacking force...

There is absolutely NO evidence to support the Obama administrations claim that this was a "spontaneous" demonstration...

Let me say that again for the cheap seats...

There is absolutely NO evidence to support the Obama administration's claim that this was a "spontaneous" demonstration...

None.. Zero.. Zilch.. Nada..

This discussion does have one good aspect. It has proven beyond ANY doubt that Michty and "Facts" are not even on the same planet....

As an aside to ninjaf...

First CBS News and the Rachael Maddow??

WOW, ya got some unbiased sources there, eh!? :D

So, if I post FNC and Breitbart sources, you'll be totally on board with them right?? :D

Michale.....

Michale,
It's hilarious that you call yourself a NPA/Independent/Whatever-phrase-to-try-and-justify-your-bias. Ninjaf or I are not even arguing that it WASN'T a planned terrorist attack - we are saying that as things stand there is no compelling evidence to suggest it was. This is a far more neutral or independent position than you are ever capable of achieving because of your own blind bias. Regardless of what the administration said about the attack you'd have jumped to the opposite conclusion because you are completely bigoted against them.

No, I am simply saying that the Obama administration lied for political gain...

Ya'all are really big on lies when it's a GOP adminstration.. But you give a DEM administration a free pass..

Once again proving that really the ONLY thing that matters is the '-D' or the '-R' after the name..

Michale.....

And it sure as hell wasn't because of some obscure video that has been in circulation for months..

Michale.....

I can read just fine. You might have a problem with getting what you mean across...

"It still remains true (as was reported in the beginning) that this was an attack that took advantage of an opportunity when there were protesters at the embassy."
-ninjaf

This statement of yours implies that the terrorist attack was happenstance, based on the protest. In essence you are saying that if there wasn't a protest, there wouldn't have been an attack.

Now, that may not be what you MEANT, but it IS what you said..

And such a supposition is moose poop...

Do you honestly believe that terrorists would arm themselves with heavy weapons, set up a two prong attack which would betray their inside knowledge of security procedures and then sit idly by *HOPING* for a protest??

I know for a FACT that you are not that obtuse... After all, we agree on 60% of the issues. :D

The protest/demonstration, if it even existed at all, was likely part of the terrorist plan.

Ergo, it was NOT a spontaneous demonstration/protest as the Obama Administration clearly stated it was.

I realize it's hard for ya'all to concede when I am right. But I am...

I realize it's harder still for ya'all to concede that the Obama Administration was wrong. But it was...

Ya'all sure have no problem jumping up and down and crowing when I am wrong. Which I admit it DOES happen occasionally.

It sure would be nice, though, if you would show a little integrity and concede when I am right..

Yea, I know, I know... Ya'all (with a few exceptions) would rather swallow hot glass than do that...

Michale.....

It still remains true (as was reported in the beginning) that this was an attack that took advantage of an opportunity when there were protesters at the embassy.

Once again, this simply doesn't fit the facts. It was a terrorist op, pure and simple.

You think that the terrorists just HAPPENED to have TWO TEAMS, just HAPPENED to have positioned them in exactly the right spots, just HAPPENED to know the location of the safe house and just HAPPENED to know the Security team's route to the safe house??

Basically, what you are saying is akin to claiming that, on 11 Sep 2001, the terrorists just happened to notice that airport security was lax and so took advantage of it to fly planes into the WTC and the Pentagon.

Your opinion is borne out of complete and utter ignorance of the field and your complete and utter devotion to the Obama Administration..

Your's and mitchy's theories are simply IMPOSSIBLE and do not line up with the facts in any way, shape or form...

Yer wrong.. No two ways about it.. Yer wrong.. Period..

As far as CBS news???

Bush National Guard papers..

'nuff said...

Michale.....

You claim to be all about the facts, but per your usual MO, you simply deny the facts that PROVE you are a liar...

The revelation comes on the same day a top Obama administration official called last week's deadly assault a "terrorist attack" -- the first time the attack has been described that way by the administration after claims it had been a "spontaneous" act.

"Yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy," Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said during a Senate hearing Wednesday.

At least you have proven beyond ANY doubt that you simply ignore the facts that don't fit your Obama-Koolaid binge driven fantasies....

Once again, michty..

You are wrong. This is FACT...

Obama was wrong. This is fact....

Obama's propaganda minister was wrong. This is fact..

When I said that the Obama Administration would change their story within 24 hours, I was right...

Deal with it...

Michale.....

For the record, Baghdad Bob has more credibility than Jay Carney.....

Michale....

For the record, THAT ^^^^ bonehead statement comes from Obama's PRESS Secretary..

What the hell do you THINK he would say???

Of COURSE he is going to toe the Obama line.. A line, I might add, that NO ONE with more than two brain-cells to rub together would EVER take seriously...

Cue michty..... :D

Michale.....

Like I said.. You pick the ONE paragraph out of the entire article that somewhat supports your fantasy..

Let me lay a little bit of reality on you, michty...

Speaking from great experience...

You have an attack on a consulate... Per SOP, security forces move our HVT to a secure location. Often times it's a "panic room" within the embassy that can be held under siege until friendly forces arrive..

Being that this was a consulate, it's likely that no such provisions were available. In such cases, a safe house is designated and security forces move our HVT to said safe house by a randomly chosen route..

Now, let's apply what we have just learned to the Benghazi....

We will use YOUR fantasy demonstration.. Well as much as we can...

A protest demonstration over an obscure YouTube video begins at the Benghazi Consulate. Al Qaeda terrorists, on the spur of the moment, brings in heavy weapons and RPGs in an attempt to assassinate our Ambassador...

Security forces, following SOP move HVT to the safe house..

This is where your scenario completely falls apart.

A SECOND terrorist team is lying in wait for the security team with the HVT to show up. ANOTHER attack ensues AT THE SAFE HOUSE and security forces with the HVT are killed..

Now.. YOUR reasoning that this was a random spontaneous extension of the protest/demonstration completely fails..

If this WASN'T a planned attack, if this WAS a spontaneous extension of the protest, a target of opportunity, how do you explain the pre-planning??

I can assure you with complete authority that you simply CANNOT pull a TWO-PRONGED, WELL TIMED attack against a FORTIFIED PRE-WARNED security force out of your ass at a moments notice...

It is simply NOT within the realm of possibility...

Given these FACTS, there is simply NO POSSIBLE way that the assault on the Benghazi Consulate was ANYTHING other than a well-planned and well-executed terrorist attack..

Give it up, michty.

You were wrong...

Obama was wrong...

Accept it gracefully and move on....

Michale.....

Lolol.

Free-loaders in healthcare = totally fine.
Free-loaders in federal income tax = bunch of bums that I don't give a shit about.

What I can tell you is that, as I said last week, as ... our ambassador to the United Nations said on Sunday and as I said the other day, based on what we know now and knew at the time, we have no evidence of a preplanned or premeditated attack

Considering the above.....

I'de say quite a few of them, now... :D

Michale.....

"READ MY LIPS... NO NEW TAXES!!!"

"I would say yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy," Matt Olsen, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said Wednesday at a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, in response to questioning from Chairman Joe Lieberman (I-CT) about the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/09/19/obama_official_benghazi_was_a_terrorist_attack

Someone owes me 20,000 Quatloos! :D

Michale.....

Just of be clear, the above comment was meant for you!

*36% of all Americans of working age are either not working or looking for work.

How many of those people do you suppose are Republcand and Independents who intend to vote for Mitt Romney?

According to Mitt Romney, all of these people are Democrats, not matter what, and safely in the bag for Obama. Is it possible to be more out of touch with reality than that!?

;)

You are so desperate that you REALLY have to go there???

That's just sad.....

Michale.....

You also can't concede a very simple point: that what Romney said is not only nonsense but likely to be very bad for him. But then all you see is hatred for Obama so that doesn't surprise me.

Btw Rush agrees with Romney and thinks he should make these pesky moochers front and centre of his campaign. I completely agree with Rush. I really do think Romney should do this, it would be amazing!

Everything good and right comes from Obama..

Everything evil and bad comes from the Right..

What an AWESOME track record this is.....

Michale.....

Yes mitchy..
Anything that speaks against Romney is dead on ballz accurate facts...

Yes mitchy... it's OK...

here's a nice soothing glass of Obama kool-aid.. Drink up now...

Yes.. mitchy.. It's OK.. Obama will win the election. Yeeess.. That's good... settle down now..

You're safe and sound in MitchyLand....

Michale.....

http://www.samefacts.com/2012/09/watching-conservatives/litmus-test/

It's almost as if they put out Republican leaning polls in the build up to the election to try and garner support for McCain then, right before the election, adjusted their polls to be in line with reality.

But nah, that isn't possible right? There is no way Scott Rasmussen, a declared Conservative, can be biased when he has written such un-biased articles on his site as:
- 'Let Individuals, Not Politicians, Make Health Care Decisions'
- 'Government Has No Business Dabbling in Business'

Of the last 13 polls Rasmussen is the ONLY one to show Romney in a lead. Rasmussen is consistently redder than all other pollsters.

But nah, these facts are meaningless. They're probably not biased.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/09/17/rasmussen-the-gops-cure-for-the-common-poll/?print=1

Of course, you ignore the FACT that Rasmussen called it dead on ballz accurate in 2008...

There are no facts in michtyland that aren't Pro-Obama facts...

Michale.....

Yes, michty... Romney might as well concede now..

Yes, michty... Here is some more Obama koolaid for you....

Jeeze, it's almost going to be child abuse on 7 Nov.....

Michale.....