<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old-School Editorializing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 11:24:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comment-18701</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042#comment-18701</guid>
		<description>dsws -

OK, I was tired.  The word &quot;literal&quot; was not appropriate.  Mea culpa!

DerFarm -

Actually, I was going back even further, to the period roughly between 1790 and the Civil War.  See if Wikipedia has anything on the &quot;Washington Globe&quot; newspaper, for instance...

But you are right about the &quot;Yellow Kid&quot; being the origin of the Yellow Journalism moniker!

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsws -</p>
<p>OK, I was tired.  The word "literal" was not appropriate.  Mea culpa!</p>
<p>DerFarm -</p>
<p>Actually, I was going back even further, to the period roughly between 1790 and the Civil War.  See if Wikipedia has anything on the "Washington Globe" newspaper, for instance...</p>
<p>But you are right about the "Yellow Kid" being the origin of the Yellow Journalism moniker!</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comment-18691</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042#comment-18691</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Even if I believe that Newt Gingrich would be an absolute disaster for the future of our great country, should he be elected. [Heh.]&lt;/i&gt;

funny thing, for all his flaws and foibles, i happen to believe that newt would be the LEAST disastrous of the bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Even if I believe that Newt Gingrich would be an absolute disaster for the future of our great country, should he be elected. [Heh.]</i></p>
<p>funny thing, for all his flaws and foibles, i happen to believe that newt would be the LEAST disastrous of the bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerFarm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comment-18686</link>
		<dc:creator>DerFarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042#comment-18686</guid>
		<description>yeah.  Old School.  Like Hearst with Yellow Journalism (which actually referred to cartoon characters, but was perfectly adaptable to anti-Chinese fervor).

Speaking of Hearst, do you mean journalism like the media driven &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smplanet.com/imperialism/remember.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;war&lt;/a&gt; with Spain?  

Be careful what you ask for.  You might get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah.  Old School.  Like Hearst with Yellow Journalism (which actually referred to cartoon characters, but was perfectly adaptable to anti-Chinese fervor).</p>
<p>Speaking of Hearst, do you mean journalism like the media driven <a href="http://www.smplanet.com/imperialism/remember.html" rel="nofollow">war</a> with Spain?  </p>
<p>Be careful what you ask for.  You might get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comment-18683</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042#comment-18683</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Once a newspaper had made its mind up, to put it another way, it jumped into the fray with both feet. Coming out for a particular candidate meant throwing the weight of the paper behind that candidate full-force, with daily front-page editorials about why their candidate was the best thing America had ever seen in a politician, and why any of the other clowns and pretenders running would be an absolute disaster for the future of our great country.&lt;/I&gt;

Rather ironic that, back in the day, newspapers would be so political..

I say ironic because, back in the day, they also practiced REAL journalism...   :D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Once a newspaper had made its mind up, to put it another way, it jumped into the fray with both feet. Coming out for a particular candidate meant throwing the weight of the paper behind that candidate full-force, with daily front-page editorials about why their candidate was the best thing America had ever seen in a politician, and why any of the other clowns and pretenders running would be an absolute disaster for the future of our great country.</i></p>
<p>Rather ironic that, back in the day, newspapers would be so political..</p>
<p>I say ironic because, back in the day, they also practiced REAL journalism...   :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comment-18675</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042#comment-18675</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it used to mean full-throated endorsement, in the literal sense of the word&lt;/i&gt;

They signed the candidates&#039; backs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it used to mean full-throated endorsement, in the literal sense of the word</i></p>
<p>They signed the candidates' backs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbl_inAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comment-18674</link>
		<dc:creator>jbl_inAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042#comment-18674</guid>
		<description>The opposite end of the spectrum from today&#039;s practices is William Randolph Hearst -- see &lt;i&gt;Citizen Kane&lt;/i&gt; for a quick and easy lesson on that -- but I don&#039;t think most papers were that extreme.  Even I remember when they were a lot more involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opposite end of the spectrum from today's practices is William Randolph Hearst -- see <i>Citizen Kane</i> for a quick and easy lesson on that -- but I don't think most papers were that extreme.  Even I remember when they were a lot more involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
