<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney Inevitable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jbl_inAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18440</link>
		<dc:creator>jbl_inAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18440</guid>
		<description>&quot;crunch&lt;b&gt;y&lt;/b&gt;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"crunch<b>y</b>"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbl_inAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18439</link>
		<dc:creator>jbl_inAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18439</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;For the first time, CW.com will be a self-financing concern for the coming year.&lt;/i&gt;

Yippee-ki-yay! or, Congratulations.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I prefer, &quot;Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunch and good with ketchup.&quot;

Of course, that&#039;s not so relevant; I just like it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>For the first time, CW.com will be a self-financing concern for the coming year.</i></p>
<p>Yippee-ki-yay! or, Congratulations.</p>
<p><i>"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger."</i></p>
<p>I prefer, "Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunch and good with ketchup."</p>
<p>Of course, that's not so relevant; I just like it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18438</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18438</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; THANKS to everyone who donated! When I started this site, I never dreamed people would actually send me hard cold cash for what I do, and I am truly overwhelmed at everyone&#039;s support. 2012 should be a banner year! &lt;/i&gt; 

Well deserved, CW. 2011 was a splendid year of political writing. 

Now back to work! We expect a great 2012 for that $50 salary :)

&lt;i&gt; The only person this could possibly hurt is Santorum. I wonder what Perry was promised, and who promised it? &lt;/i&gt; 

Great question indeed. Mitt owes him big time. I hope he&#039;s at least getting something in return.

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> THANKS to everyone who donated! When I started this site, I never dreamed people would actually send me hard cold cash for what I do, and I am truly overwhelmed at everyone's support. 2012 should be a banner year! </i> </p>
<p>Well deserved, CW. 2011 was a splendid year of political writing. </p>
<p>Now back to work! We expect a great 2012 for that $50 salary :)</p>
<p><i> The only person this could possibly hurt is Santorum. I wonder what Perry was promised, and who promised it? </i> </p>
<p>Great question indeed. Mitt owes him big time. I hope he's at least getting something in return.</p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerFarm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18437</link>
		<dc:creator>DerFarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18437</guid>
		<description>Well, it looks as tho the gods favor Mittens.  Apparently, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-04/perry-to-assess-presidential-bid-after-fifth-place-finish-in-iowa-caucuses.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Perry&lt;/a&gt; is NOT leaving the race until at least after SC.

The only person this could possibly hurt is Santorum.  I wonder what Perry was promised, and who promised it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks as tho the gods favor Mittens.  Apparently, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-04/perry-to-assess-presidential-bid-after-fifth-place-finish-in-iowa-caucuses.html" rel="nofollow">Perry</a> is NOT leaving the race until at least after SC.</p>
<p>The only person this could possibly hurt is Santorum.  I wonder what Perry was promised, and who promised it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerFarm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18436</link>
		<dc:creator>DerFarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18436</guid>
		<description>Well, I had Santorum tagged at 29%.  I never thought that the Perry folks would hold to him.  So far I&#039;m batting 100%.  Dead wrong all the time.

I like the inevitable tag.  Paul is not a national candidate.  Too many people don&#039;t like him.

We&#039;ve seen what happened to Gingrich, no reason to think he&#039;ll be able to pull it out.

I still think Santorum is a one-trick pony, and that trick has left the station.  If he had any kind of national structure he could have a choice.  Even tho he&#039;s Catholic, he&#039;ll run well in Baptist country.  Bachmann and Perry leaving are going to help a lot, but even so, its late to be putting together a staff.

Where is the non-Mitt $$$ going to go to?  Better question: IS the non-Mitt $$$ going to come out?  I guess with enough money you could create an organization overnight.  Maybe even take over Perry&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I had Santorum tagged at 29%.  I never thought that the Perry folks would hold to him.  So far I'm batting 100%.  Dead wrong all the time.</p>
<p>I like the inevitable tag.  Paul is not a national candidate.  Too many people don't like him.</p>
<p>We've seen what happened to Gingrich, no reason to think he'll be able to pull it out.</p>
<p>I still think Santorum is a one-trick pony, and that trick has left the station.  If he had any kind of national structure he could have a choice.  Even tho he's Catholic, he'll run well in Baptist country.  Bachmann and Perry leaving are going to help a lot, but even so, its late to be putting together a staff.</p>
<p>Where is the non-Mitt $$$ going to go to?  Better question: IS the non-Mitt $$$ going to come out?  I guess with enough money you could create an organization overnight.  Maybe even take over Perry's?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18435</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18435</guid>
		<description>David -

What&#039;s the saying?

&quot;Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger.&quot;

That&#039;s from memory, anyway...

Heh.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David -</p>
<p>What's the saying?</p>
<p>"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger."</p>
<p>That's from memory, anyway...</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18434</guid>
		<description>CW,

&lt;I&gt;Hey, forgot to mention, we MADE OUR GOAL! &lt;/I&gt;

Woot!!!!!

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW,</p>
<p><i>Hey, forgot to mention, we MADE OUR GOAL! </i></p>
<p>Woot!!!!!</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18433</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18433</guid>
		<description>David,

&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s hard to argue with God and warlocks ... :)&lt;/I&gt;

Couldn&#039;t have said it better..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p><i>It's hard to argue with God and warlocks ... :)</i></p>
<p>Couldn't have said it better..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18432</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18432</guid>
		<description>jbl_inAZ -

Yeah, that&#039;s the problem with these snap judgment articles...

After I posted it, I watched the race go back and forth between Romney and Santorum several times.  It wasn&#039;t until right before I went to bed that the final # came through.  8 votes!  Wow!

Well, I&#039;m just glad I got 1-for-3 in my guessing.  If Santorum had won, I would have been 0-for-3.  

Just watched Bachmann&#039;s pullout speech.  And then there were six... looks like Perry&#039;s ready to go, too.  

Huntsman will award himself some sort of consolation prize in NH, and then pull out.  Looks like four candidates for SC and FL.  The polls will be interesting to watch for the next week, that&#039;s for sure.

Hey, forgot to mention, we MADE OUR GOAL!  For the first time, CW.com will be a self-financing concern for the coming year.  Woo hoo!  And, after paying the monthly bills, looks like I&#039;ll even have about $50 or so as a &quot;salary&quot; -- that&#039;s impressive indeed, when you consider how few websites actually make it.  Just so everyone won&#039;t think I&#039;m rolling in the dough, I have contributed this $50 to Matt Osborne&#039;s site, to support our friends.

THANKS to everyone who donated!  When I started this site, I never dreamed people would actually send me hard cold cash for what I do, and I am truly overwhelmed at everyone&#039;s support.  2012 should be a banner year!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jbl_inAZ -</p>
<p>Yeah, that's the problem with these snap judgment articles...</p>
<p>After I posted it, I watched the race go back and forth between Romney and Santorum several times.  It wasn't until right before I went to bed that the final # came through.  8 votes!  Wow!</p>
<p>Well, I'm just glad I got 1-for-3 in my guessing.  If Santorum had won, I would have been 0-for-3.  </p>
<p>Just watched Bachmann's pullout speech.  And then there were six... looks like Perry's ready to go, too.  </p>
<p>Huntsman will award himself some sort of consolation prize in NH, and then pull out.  Looks like four candidates for SC and FL.  The polls will be interesting to watch for the next week, that's for sure.</p>
<p>Hey, forgot to mention, we MADE OUR GOAL!  For the first time, CW.com will be a self-financing concern for the coming year.  Woo hoo!  And, after paying the monthly bills, looks like I'll even have about $50 or so as a "salary" -- that's impressive indeed, when you consider how few websites actually make it.  Just so everyone won't think I'm rolling in the dough, I have contributed this $50 to Matt Osborne's site, to support our friends.</p>
<p>THANKS to everyone who donated!  When I started this site, I never dreamed people would actually send me hard cold cash for what I do, and I am truly overwhelmed at everyone's support.  2012 should be a banner year!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18431</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18431</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Mexico&#039;s Grand Warlock said that Obama is going to lose. &lt;/i&gt; 

God also told Pat Robertson that Obama is a radical who&#039;s going to bring on America&#039;s collapse. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNhrNqS0lyE&amp;feature=player_embedded

It&#039;s hard to argue with God and warlocks ... :)

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Mexico's Grand Warlock said that Obama is going to lose. </i> </p>
<p>God also told Pat Robertson that Obama is a radical who's going to bring on America's collapse. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNhrNqS0lyE&amp;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNhrNqS0lyE&amp;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
<p>It's hard to argue with God and warlocks ... :)</p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18430</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18430</guid>
		<description>I think the comparison to John Kerry is dead on ballz accurate...

Hopefully, history won&#039;t repeat itself...

On the other hand, Mexico&#039;s Grand Warlock said that Obama is going to lose..

&lt;B&gt;Mexico&#039;s grand warlock predicts Obama will lose&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16405116

So, I think we&#039;re good..  :D

Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the comparison to John Kerry is dead on ballz accurate...</p>
<p>Hopefully, history won't repeat itself...</p>
<p>On the other hand, Mexico's Grand Warlock said that Obama is going to lose..</p>
<p><b>Mexico's grand warlock predicts Obama will lose</b><br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16405116" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16405116</a></p>
<p>So, I think we're good..  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18429</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18429</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; romney, much like john kerry who he most reminds me of, suffers from the same &quot;tin-man&quot; issue. no matter how smart or disciplined a candidate he may be, he seems not to have any heart to speak of. &lt;/i&gt; 

Agreed, nypoet. I miss Herman Cain. At least he had personality. I&#039;ll have to watch Santorum though as I haven&#039;t really heard him speak. 

It&#039;s also amazing to watch Romney dissemble when he talks about things like health care. I&#039;d have more respect for him if he took credit for the health care plan in Massachusetts. In this respect, he is also like John McCain - he has to say things in which he doesn&#039;t really believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> romney, much like john kerry who he most reminds me of, suffers from the same "tin-man" issue. no matter how smart or disciplined a candidate he may be, he seems not to have any heart to speak of. </i> </p>
<p>Agreed, nypoet. I miss Herman Cain. At least he had personality. I'll have to watch Santorum though as I haven't really heard him speak. </p>
<p>It's also amazing to watch Romney dissemble when he talks about things like health care. I'd have more respect for him if he took credit for the health care plan in Massachusetts. In this respect, he is also like John McCain - he has to say things in which he doesn't really believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18428</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18428</guid>
		<description>BTW- Happy New Year to everyone! Here&#039;s to more great political conversations in 2012</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW- Happy New Year to everyone! Here's to more great political conversations in 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18427</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18427</guid>
		<description>the CNN horse-race coverage was exciting to watch, as the vote margin was under ten for the last hour or so and the lead kept changing. unfortunately it led to me not getting much sleep. romney, much like john kerry who he most reminds me of, suffers from the same &quot;tin-man&quot; issue. no matter how smart or disciplined a candidate he may be, he seems not to have any heart to speak of. santorum&#039;s speech last night really highlighted that by contrast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the CNN horse-race coverage was exciting to watch, as the vote margin was under ten for the last hour or so and the lead kept changing. unfortunately it led to me not getting much sleep. romney, much like john kerry who he most reminds me of, suffers from the same "tin-man" issue. no matter how smart or disciplined a candidate he may be, he seems not to have any heart to speak of. santorum's speech last night really highlighted that by contrast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18426</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18426</guid>
		<description>Bring on Romney and his health care plan! 

Kidding. I don&#039;t know as he&#039;s inevitable or not yet. The interesting thing is, if you add up all of the &quot;not Romney&quot;s you get 75% of the vote. 

That means Romney needs the others in the race to split the remaining electorate along several lines so he can win. This has to be a huge concern for Romney which no one is talking about. Mike Huckabee when he won 4 years ago won with 34% of the vote. 

What happens if other candidates drop out? Who will their votes go to? 

This is what could decide the election. But the story we&#039;re likely to hear in the media is the inevitability of Romney because this is how he hopes to win. And he&#039;s got the most money by far of any of the candidates. 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring on Romney and his health care plan! </p>
<p>Kidding. I don't know as he's inevitable or not yet. The interesting thing is, if you add up all of the "not Romney"s you get 75% of the vote. </p>
<p>That means Romney needs the others in the race to split the remaining electorate along several lines so he can win. This has to be a huge concern for Romney which no one is talking about. Mike Huckabee when he won 4 years ago won with 34% of the vote. </p>
<p>What happens if other candidates drop out? Who will their votes go to? </p>
<p>This is what could decide the election. But the story we're likely to hear in the media is the inevitability of Romney because this is how he hopes to win. And he's got the most money by far of any of the candidates. </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18425</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18425</guid>
		<description>While I have nothing to doubt the Romney Inevitable claim, I am constrained to point out that everyone thought Hillary was inevitable too...

I&#039;m just sayin&#039;...  :D


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I have nothing to doubt the Romney Inevitable claim, I am constrained to point out that everyone thought Hillary was inevitable too...</p>
<p>I'm just sayin'...  :D</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18424</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18424</guid>
		<description>He may be inevitable, but the Republican primary electorate will dredge the also-rans a bit longer, at least: Romney stayed at his ceiling, Ron Paul is Ron Paul, and Santorum has a problem with name recognition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may be inevitable, but the Republican primary electorate will dredge the also-rans a bit longer, at least: Romney stayed at his ceiling, Ron Paul is Ron Paul, and Santorum has a problem with name recognition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbl_inAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comment-18423</link>
		<dc:creator>jbl_inAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009#comment-18423</guid>
		<description>I feel you&#039;re quite right, though I&#039;ll bet you wish you&#039;d waited a couple more hours.  A difference of 8 votes means talk of a victory will now be talk of a tie and will emphasize Santorum&#039;s equal showing.  Your bottom line is probably not affected -- and waiting till after Florida is smart -- but still. 

Just saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel you're quite right, though I'll bet you wish you'd waited a couple more hours.  A difference of 8 votes means talk of a victory will now be talk of a tie and will emphasize Santorum's equal showing.  Your bottom line is probably not affected -- and waiting till after Florida is smart -- but still. </p>
<p>Just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
