<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ryan Budget Acid Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 06:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant: Friday Talking Points &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#124; brazilia News</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14545</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant: Friday Talking Points &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#124; brazilia News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 05:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14545</guid>
		<description>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant: Friday Talking Points &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#187; Grubbyhub Blog - Get Your Latest Info Here!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14539</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant: Friday Talking Points &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#187; Grubbyhub Blog - Get Your Latest Info Here!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 02:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14539</guid>
		<description>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant: Friday Talking Points &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#124; MainstreamNemesis.com</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14538</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant: Friday Talking Points &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#124; MainstreamNemesis.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 02:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14538</guid>
		<description>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Talking Points [168] &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#171; Democrats for Progress</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14535</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Talking Points [168] &#8212; Zombie Attack! &#171; Democrats for Progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 01:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14535</guid>
		<description>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] head&#8230; but I digress&#8230;). I wrote about the whole thing earlier this week in my own take on how the Republican Party has just made the Ryan budget their central acid test for the 2012 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [168] -- Zombie Attack!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14531</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points [168] -- Zombie Attack!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 00:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14531</guid>
		<description>[...] The Ryan Budget Acid Test [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Ryan Budget Acid Test [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14519</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14519</guid>
		<description>Remember how I said earlier that Obama could still face a primary challenge if he did something stoopid??

Throwing Israel under the bus surely qualifies...

:^/

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how I said earlier that Obama could still face a primary challenge if he did something stoopid??</p>
<p>Throwing Israel under the bus surely qualifies...</p>
<p>:^/</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne Ink &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning Awful: Gingrich Memory Hole</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14518</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne Ink &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning Awful: Gingrich Memory Hole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 11:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14518</guid>
		<description>[...] GOP lineup into a corner &#8212; effectively making the Ryan Plan an &#8220;acid test&#8221; that marginalizes all of them. Via Thinkprogress, we have video of cognitive dissonance and Soviet-style historical revisionism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GOP lineup into a corner &#8212; effectively making the Ryan Plan an &#8220;acid test&#8221; that marginalizes all of them. Via Thinkprogress, we have video of cognitive dissonance and Soviet-style historical revisionism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14517</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 09:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14517</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all get all giggley about the Right being &quot;extreme&quot;...

Well, hasn&#039;t President Obama been saying for years now that something &quot;extreme&quot; must be done to save the economy?  But I do agree with Newt (and David.. :D)  Social engineering from the Right is just as distasteful as social engineering from the Left...

Further, you keep going on and on about how bad the Ryan budget is, but in every poll I have seen and read about, the majority of Americans prefer Ryan&#039;s budget to anything the Democrats have come up with..

Now, ya&#039;all know my feelings about polls, so that doesn&#039;t amount to a whole lot, to be sure...

David,

&lt;I&gt;1. You can&#039;t even have a conversation about healthcare from the right unless you tow the most extreme line. &lt;/I&gt;

Just like you can&#039;t have a conversation about healthcare from the Left unless you tow the most extreme line...  IE Single Payer

&lt;I&gt;I genuinely am starting to lament the fact that there seem to be no viable conservative candidates in the upcoming election. Its almost as if the Republican party has decided that they would rather have Obama as President because he makes a great enemy. Or something. Idunno. Its hard for me to understand how they can&#039;t come up with someone who is a more attractive candidate.&lt;/I&gt;

My guess is that the GOP is thinking that the execution of Bin Laden will make Obama unbeatable..

I think the GOP is putting too much stock in that..  Obama&#039;s poll numbers already lost the Bin Laden Bump last week, so I don&#039;t think the GOP needs to worry too much about that..

I have a feeling that the GOP might fall victim to the Delaware Dilemma....  :D

On another note.. We seem to be hearing a lot of &quot;birther&quot; nonsense again..

But, it&#039;s coming from President Obama..

Waditellya??   We&#039;re Americans..  We love to gloat..  It&#039;s who we are...  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all get all giggley about the Right being "extreme"...</p>
<p>Well, hasn't President Obama been saying for years now that something "extreme" must be done to save the economy?  But I do agree with Newt (and David.. :D)  Social engineering from the Right is just as distasteful as social engineering from the Left...</p>
<p>Further, you keep going on and on about how bad the Ryan budget is, but in every poll I have seen and read about, the majority of Americans prefer Ryan's budget to anything the Democrats have come up with..</p>
<p>Now, ya'all know my feelings about polls, so that doesn't amount to a whole lot, to be sure...</p>
<p>David,</p>
<p><i>1. You can't even have a conversation about healthcare from the right unless you tow the most extreme line. </i></p>
<p>Just like you can't have a conversation about healthcare from the Left unless you tow the most extreme line...  IE Single Payer</p>
<p><i>I genuinely am starting to lament the fact that there seem to be no viable conservative candidates in the upcoming election. Its almost as if the Republican party has decided that they would rather have Obama as President because he makes a great enemy. Or something. Idunno. Its hard for me to understand how they can't come up with someone who is a more attractive candidate.</i></p>
<p>My guess is that the GOP is thinking that the execution of Bin Laden will make Obama unbeatable..</p>
<p>I think the GOP is putting too much stock in that..  Obama's poll numbers already lost the Bin Laden Bump last week, so I don't think the GOP needs to worry too much about that..</p>
<p>I have a feeling that the GOP might fall victim to the Delaware Dilemma....  :D</p>
<p>On another note.. We seem to be hearing a lot of "birther" nonsense again..</p>
<p>But, it's coming from President Obama..</p>
<p>Waditellya??   We're Americans..  We love to gloat..  It's who we are...  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne Ink</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14516</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 07:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14516</guid>
		<description>Newt shoved it right down the memory hole, didn&#039;t he? &quot;This is the only past than can have ever existed.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt shoved it right down the memory hole, didn't he? "This is the only past than can have ever existed."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14515</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 06:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14515</guid>
		<description>dsws -

My take on it is that what Newt said on Sunday was actually pretty reasonable.  Newt got burned as Speaker, he knows what &quot;going too far&quot; means, and he was attempting to nicely say this to the Republicans.  His position on Ryan&#039;s plan is that most of it is fine, but that you shouldn&#039;t force people into the new plan, instead entice them to sign up because they see it as a better plan.  This is how we got Medicare Advantage, remember.  His criticism was really that Ryan&#039;s plan doesn&#039;t give people a choice.

But that all got lost in the fray.  The way I see it, Newt forgot he had a primary to win, and was talking how he would be if he was in the general election campaign.

The way I see it, to put it another way, is that Newt was lying later on, with all the walking back he tried to do, but that he wasn&#039;t in the first place.  I don&#039;t think he misspoke, I think he committed what&#039;s called a &quot;Washington gaffe&quot; -- to accidentally speak the truth when political doublespeak is expected.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsws -</p>
<p>My take on it is that what Newt said on Sunday was actually pretty reasonable.  Newt got burned as Speaker, he knows what "going too far" means, and he was attempting to nicely say this to the Republicans.  His position on Ryan's plan is that most of it is fine, but that you shouldn't force people into the new plan, instead entice them to sign up because they see it as a better plan.  This is how we got Medicare Advantage, remember.  His criticism was really that Ryan's plan doesn't give people a choice.</p>
<p>But that all got lost in the fray.  The way I see it, Newt forgot he had a primary to win, and was talking how he would be if he was in the general election campaign.</p>
<p>The way I see it, to put it another way, is that Newt was lying later on, with all the walking back he tried to do, but that he wasn't in the first place.  I don't think he misspoke, I think he committed what's called a "Washington gaffe" -- to accidentally speak the truth when political doublespeak is expected.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14514</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 02:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14514</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood. Because I have said publicly those words were inaccurate.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That sounds pretty straightforward: &#039;I misspoke, and then corrected it.  If anyone claims the mistake represents my position, they&#039;re lying.&#039;

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I just hope the lamestream media won&#039;t twist my words by repeating them verbatim.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Even that can be parsed as reasonable: &#039;I said something ambiguous.  Quoting it without explanation sounds like ____, but as I have made clear elsewhere, the other meaning is the one I intended.&#039;

There&#039;s a reason that politicians never say anything but prepared talking points.  Real human speech contains errors and ambiguities, and our political theater has no tolerance for either.

Yes, Newt was lying.  It wasn&#039;t a mis-statement.  It was a prepared talking point that didn&#039;t play well.  But would it have been tolerated any better if it had been an error?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"Any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood. Because I have said publicly those words were inaccurate."</i></p>
<p>That sounds pretty straightforward: 'I misspoke, and then corrected it.  If anyone claims the mistake represents my position, they're lying.'</p>
<p><i>"I just hope the lamestream media won't twist my words by repeating them verbatim."</i></p>
<p>Even that can be parsed as reasonable: 'I said something ambiguous.  Quoting it without explanation sounds like ____, but as I have made clear elsewhere, the other meaning is the one I intended.'</p>
<p>There's a reason that politicians never say anything but prepared talking points.  Real human speech contains errors and ambiguities, and our political theater has no tolerance for either.</p>
<p>Yes, Newt was lying.  It wasn't a mis-statement.  It was a prepared talking point that didn't play well.  But would it have been tolerated any better if it had been an error?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14512</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 01:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14512</guid>
		<description>p.s. On a lighter note, I wonder which candidate has the best chance of being raptured this Saturday :)

http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2011/05/18/a-brief-history-of-the-end-of-time/?mod=google_news_blog

My pick would have been Huckabee. But he&#039;s no longer in it to win it, so its all quite unclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. On a lighter note, I wonder which candidate has the best chance of being raptured this Saturday :)</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2011/05/18/a-brief-history-of-the-end-of-time/?mod=google_news_blog" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2011/05/18/a-brief-history-of-the-end-of-time/?mod=google_news_blog</a></p>
<p>My pick would have been Huckabee. But he's no longer in it to win it, so its all quite unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comment-14511</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989#comment-14511</guid>
		<description>CW-

Was hoping you&#039;d post on this topic. I almost hate to say it but there&#039;s several things about this that seem sad to me: 

1. You can&#039;t even have a conversation about healthcare from the right unless you tow the most extreme line. 

2. I genuinely am starting to lament the fact that there seem to be no viable conservative candidates in the upcoming election. Its almost as if the Republican party has decided that they would rather have Obama as President because he makes a great enemy. Or something. Idunno. Its hard for me to understand how they can&#039;t come up with someone who is a more attractive candidate. 

3. Politico really does not like Newt: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55125.html

4. Gingrich did a better job than most progressives I&#039;ve seen describing Ryan&#039;s ideas on privatizing Medicare: right-wing social engineering. I give credit where credit is due. 

Sad, sad, sad
-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW-</p>
<p>Was hoping you'd post on this topic. I almost hate to say it but there's several things about this that seem sad to me: </p>
<p>1. You can't even have a conversation about healthcare from the right unless you tow the most extreme line. </p>
<p>2. I genuinely am starting to lament the fact that there seem to be no viable conservative candidates in the upcoming election. Its almost as if the Republican party has decided that they would rather have Obama as President because he makes a great enemy. Or something. Idunno. Its hard for me to understand how they can't come up with someone who is a more attractive candidate. </p>
<p>3. Politico really does not like Newt: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55125.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55125.html</a></p>
<p>4. Gingrich did a better job than most progressives I've seen describing Ryan's ideas on privatizing Medicare: right-wing social engineering. I give credit where credit is due. </p>
<p>Sad, sad, sad<br />
-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
