<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Spacey Three-Dot Thursday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 07:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/#comment-12907</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3389#comment-12907</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;So does this mean Obama may finally get some credit for reaching out to Republicans? :)&lt;/I&gt;

&#039;course not...

What were you thinking!??  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So does this mean Obama may finally get some credit for reaching out to Republicans? :)</i></p>
<p>'course not...</p>
<p>What were you thinking!??  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/#comment-12905</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3389#comment-12905</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; However, to be fair, the WTF slogan (Winning The Future) actually belongs to none other than Newt Gingrich. &lt;/i&gt; 

So does this mean Obama may finally get some credit for reaching out to Republicans? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> However, to be fair, the WTF slogan (Winning The Future) actually belongs to none other than Newt Gingrich. </i> </p>
<p>So does this mean Obama may finally get some credit for reaching out to Republicans? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/#comment-12904</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3389#comment-12904</guid>
		<description>WTF just about sums up my opinion too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF just about sums up my opinion too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/#comment-12900</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3389#comment-12900</guid>
		<description>I also must point out that it&#039;s politically risky for Obama to invoke space-based rhetoric, considering what he has done to totally decimate the US Space Program by budget cuts and political kow-towing..


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also must point out that it's politically risky for Obama to invoke space-based rhetoric, considering what he has done to totally decimate the US Space Program by budget cuts and political kow-towing..</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/#comment-12899</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3389#comment-12899</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The Soviets didn&#039;t actually win the Space Race, that&#039;s a good place to start.&lt;/I&gt;

The Soviets were the first to orbit a satellite in space.

That makes them the winner of the Space Race..

The US won the MOON RACE, however.

So, Palin&#039;s statement was factually accurate...

&lt;I&gt;As for Sputnik spending being the cause of the &quot;inevitable collapse of the Soviet Union,&quot; well, all I can say is Ronald Reagan must be spinning in his grave over that gross factual error.&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s well established that the USSR was destroyed by it&#039;s massive debt and it&#039;s inability to sustain such a debt..  

The Sputnik program contributed to that debt.  Which doesn&#039;t take anything away from Reagan and his programs that hastened the build-up of that debt and the eventual demise of the USSR..

This statement of Palin&#039;s was also factually correct, but lacked sufficient detail to make the connection.. 

&lt;I&gt;Heh. OK, Sarah, that was funny, even I will admit. Love her or hate her, you&#039;ve got to give her credit for her strongest feature: boiling down a snarky thought into a catchy phrase. So even if I don&#039;t agree with her one tiny bit, I do have to tip my hat to her cleverness. Like I said, it was a good one-liner.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, it was hilarious..  

However, to be fair, the WTF slogan (Winning The Future) actually belongs to none other than Newt Gingrich..

http://www.amazon.com/Winning-Future-Century-Contract-America/dp/0895260425

Also, a conservative in Oregon registered all the associated Win The Future domain names a while ago...

So, &quot;Winning The Future&quot; seems to have been taken from Republicans..  Another case of plagiarism by Obama...

&lt;I&gt;And you&#039;d think people in Washington would have learned to check acronyms by now...&lt;/I&gt;

Amen to THAT!  :D  Obama must be tearing some speechwriters a new one...

&lt;I&gt;James Bond volcano erupts. Would have included this today, if I had seen it.&lt;/I&gt;

Frak&#039;in awesome, iddn&#039;t it!!  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Soviets didn't actually win the Space Race, that's a good place to start.</i></p>
<p>The Soviets were the first to orbit a satellite in space.</p>
<p>That makes them the winner of the Space Race..</p>
<p>The US won the MOON RACE, however.</p>
<p>So, Palin's statement was factually accurate...</p>
<p><i>As for Sputnik spending being the cause of the "inevitable collapse of the Soviet Union," well, all I can say is Ronald Reagan must be spinning in his grave over that gross factual error.</i></p>
<p>It's well established that the USSR was destroyed by it's massive debt and it's inability to sustain such a debt..  </p>
<p>The Sputnik program contributed to that debt.  Which doesn't take anything away from Reagan and his programs that hastened the build-up of that debt and the eventual demise of the USSR..</p>
<p>This statement of Palin's was also factually correct, but lacked sufficient detail to make the connection.. </p>
<p><i>Heh. OK, Sarah, that was funny, even I will admit. Love her or hate her, you've got to give her credit for her strongest feature: boiling down a snarky thought into a catchy phrase. So even if I don't agree with her one tiny bit, I do have to tip my hat to her cleverness. Like I said, it was a good one-liner.</i></p>
<p>Yea, it was hilarious..  </p>
<p>However, to be fair, the WTF slogan (Winning The Future) actually belongs to none other than Newt Gingrich..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Winning-Future-Century-Contract-America/dp/0895260425" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Winning-Future-Century-Contract-America/dp/0895260425</a></p>
<p>Also, a conservative in Oregon registered all the associated Win The Future domain names a while ago...</p>
<p>So, "Winning The Future" seems to have been taken from Republicans..  Another case of plagiarism by Obama...</p>
<p><i>And you'd think people in Washington would have learned to check acronyms by now...</i></p>
<p>Amen to THAT!  :D  Obama must be tearing some speechwriters a new one...</p>
<p><i>James Bond volcano erupts. Would have included this today, if I had seen it.</i></p>
<p>Frak'in awesome, iddn't it!!  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/#comment-12896</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3389#comment-12896</guid>
		<description>dsws -

Seems to be too big a coincidence, that&#039;s all I&#039;m saying...

For Michale:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/blog-post/2011/01/japan_volcano_erupts_prompts_e.html?hpid=news-col-blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James Bond volcano erupts&lt;/a&gt;.  Would have included this today, if I had seen it.

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsws -</p>
<p>Seems to be too big a coincidence, that's all I'm saying...</p>
<p>For Michale:</p>
<p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/blog-post/2011/01/japan_volcano_erupts_prompts_e.html?hpid=news-col-blog" rel="nofollow">James Bond volcano erupts</a>.  Would have included this today, if I had seen it.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/27/a-spacey-three-dot-thursday/#comment-12895</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3389#comment-12895</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have to at least give her credit for a good one-liner&quot;

Agreed.

&quot;you&#039;d think people in Washington would have learned to check acronyms&quot;

Yet you balk at the idea that they didn&#039;t check the Sputnik history of every factory-showcasing whistle stop on the itinerary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I have to at least give her credit for a good one-liner"</p>
<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>"you'd think people in Washington would have learned to check acronyms"</p>
<p>Yet you balk at the idea that they didn't check the Sputnik history of every factory-showcasing whistle stop on the itinerary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
