<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shaking Hands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/#comment-11758</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2921#comment-11758</guid>
		<description>I took a quick look at the non-answers on google.  (One of the top google hits is someone on allexperts.com telling the person who asked to just google it.  I think the internet has just epitomized itself.

Where there is anything substantive, the attitude seems to be that baseball is more like war than like an affair of honor, so that teams have enemies rather than opponents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a quick look at the non-answers on google.  (One of the top google hits is someone on allexperts.com telling the person who asked to just google it.  I think the internet has just epitomized itself.</p>
<p>Where there is anything substantive, the attitude seems to be that baseball is more like war than like an affair of honor, so that teams have enemies rather than opponents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/#comment-11757</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2921#comment-11757</guid>
		<description>Apparently, MLB is not the only group not interested in shaking hands.

&lt;B&gt;Negativity Update: 2010 Features Similar Rates of Negativity,
But Dems More Likely to Attack Personally.
Dems and Reps are Similar in Proportion of Negative Ads, but Dem Strategy Likely Driven by Desire to Draw Attention Away from the Policy Environment 


As we reported last week, ?claims that 2010 is the most negative election to date may be premature. In an analysis of close to 900,000 airings from January 1 to October 5, 2010, the Wesleyan Media Project finds that the distribution of positive, negative and contrast ads is comparable to 2008 in proportion, if not in volume.? In an update to that release, and with a focus on House and Senate races, we continue to find similar rates of negativity. Furthermore, we find that Democrats and Republicans are airing similar proportions of negative (and positive) spots in federal races. However, there is one crucial difference: Democrats are using personal attacks at much higher rates than Republicans and a much higher rate than Democrats in 2008.&lt;/B&gt;

http://election-ad.research.wesleyan.edu/files/2010/10/WesMediaProject_ReleaseTone_20101026.pdf


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, MLB is not the only group not interested in shaking hands.</p>
<p><b>Negativity Update: 2010 Features Similar Rates of Negativity,<br />
But Dems More Likely to Attack Personally.<br />
Dems and Reps are Similar in Proportion of Negative Ads, but Dem Strategy Likely Driven by Desire to Draw Attention Away from the Policy Environment </p>
<p>As we reported last week, ?claims that 2010 is the most negative election to date may be premature. In an analysis of close to 900,000 airings from January 1 to October 5, 2010, the Wesleyan Media Project finds that the distribution of positive, negative and contrast ads is comparable to 2008 in proportion, if not in volume.? In an update to that release, and with a focus on House and Senate races, we continue to find similar rates of negativity. Furthermore, we find that Democrats and Republicans are airing similar proportions of negative (and positive) spots in federal races. However, there is one crucial difference: Democrats are using personal attacks at much higher rates than Republicans and a much higher rate than Democrats in 2008.</b></p>
<p><a href="http://election-ad.research.wesleyan.edu/files/2010/10/WesMediaProject_ReleaseTone_20101026.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://election-ad.research.wesleyan.edu/files/2010/10/WesMediaProject_ReleaseTone_20101026.pdf</a></p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/#comment-11756</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2921#comment-11756</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Speaking of shaking hands with your opponents, President Obama just sat down for an hour with some liberal bloggers for a question-and-answer session. Since I&#039;ve been calling on the president to do exactly this -- reach out to the Lefty media -- for quite some time now, I could not let it go by without at least drawing some attention to it.&lt;/I&gt;

I would be more impressed if Obama sat down with people like me...

So much for Obama being President of the UNITED States, eh...


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Speaking of shaking hands with your opponents, President Obama just sat down for an hour with some liberal bloggers for a question-and-answer session. Since I've been calling on the president to do exactly this -- reach out to the Lefty media -- for quite some time now, I could not let it go by without at least drawing some attention to it.</i></p>
<p>I would be more impressed if Obama sat down with people like me...</p>
<p>So much for Obama being President of the UNITED States, eh...</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
