<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Gets His Groove Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 06:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8241</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8241</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Students will now pay LESS than before.&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s what the government tells us...

Forgive me if I don&#039;t accept it at face value..

I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s a good idea to have the US Government making decisions on who get&#039;s funds for education..

Imagine years from now when we have a GOP administration and, all of the sudden, you see school funding dry up for, say &quot;liberal arts&quot; studies or the like....

If the government gets the final word on who get&#039;s money for college, what&#039;s to stop the government from making sure that only &quot;approved&quot; education get&#039;s the funds??


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Students will now pay LESS than before.</i></p>
<p>That's what the government tells us...</p>
<p>Forgive me if I don't accept it at face value..</p>
<p>I just don't think it's a good idea to have the US Government making decisions on who get's funds for education..</p>
<p>Imagine years from now when we have a GOP administration and, all of the sudden, you see school funding dry up for, say "liberal arts" studies or the like....</p>
<p>If the government gets the final word on who get's money for college, what's to stop the government from making sure that only "approved" education get's the funds??</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8239</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8239</guid>
		<description>Michale -

Students will now pay LESS than before.  The banks were just skimming off the top, for shuffling paperwork.  The government has always backed these loans, so there&#039;s no difference there, the only difference is that now the students will file the paperwork directly with the government, instead of paying a bank thousands of dollars for filing the form for them.  The banks are still free to compete for the loan business, but the loans they offer aren&#039;t backed by the government (they&#039;ve always been free to do this, by the way).  So not much of anything has changed, except saving $68 billion that used to go to banks, for doing very little at all.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale -</p>
<p>Students will now pay LESS than before.  The banks were just skimming off the top, for shuffling paperwork.  The government has always backed these loans, so there's no difference there, the only difference is that now the students will file the paperwork directly with the government, instead of paying a bank thousands of dollars for filing the form for them.  The banks are still free to compete for the loan business, but the loans they offer aren't backed by the government (they've always been free to do this, by the way).  So not much of anything has changed, except saving $68 billion that used to go to banks, for doing very little at all.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8238</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8238</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Whoops!&lt;/strong&gt;

Better now?

Sorry, was testing last night and forgot to &quot;roll back&quot; the test code.  Still working on the comments in general, so PLEASE PLEASE let me know if things like this happen.  Thanks for the feedback, everyone.

The entry window should be fixed now, let me know if it isn&#039;t (you may have to reload the page to update it).

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Whoops!</strong></p>
<p>Better now?</p>
<p>Sorry, was testing last night and forgot to "roll back" the test code.  Still working on the comments in general, so PLEASE PLEASE let me know if things like this happen.  Thanks for the feedback, everyone.</p>
<p>The entry window should be fixed now, let me know if it isn't (you may have to reload the page to update it).</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8236</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8236</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the same small size in either Firefox or IEX 8 on a Winblows 7 Machine.


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's the same small size in either Firefox or IEX 8 on a Winblows 7 Machine.</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8233</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8233</guid>
		<description>Wow. The window can be stretched down to take up the entire screen (at least on a laptop).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. The window can be stretched down to take up the entire screen (at least on a laptop).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8232</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8232</guid>
		<description>Trippy... On Safari on a Mac the reply window is tall and super thin but there is a corner that can be pulled out to make the window bigger than normal. The text flow is funky when pulled out to max though normal when pulled out to about the posted comment width. 

On Firefox on a Mac it&#039;s small with without the ability to pull out the corner...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trippy... On Safari on a Mac the reply window is tall and super thin but there is a corner that can be pulled out to make the window bigger than normal. The text flow is funky when pulled out to max though normal when pulled out to about the posted comment width. </p>
<p>On Firefox on a Mac it's small with without the ability to pull out the corner...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8231</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8231</guid>
		<description>hehehehehe

Well, glad to see it wasn&#039;t just me..  :D

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehehehehe</p>
<p>Well, glad to see it wasn't just me..  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8228</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8228</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris - did you change the comment field or is it just me? It is now showing up very tiny in both Safari and Firefox on my Mac? Sorry for the IT interlude. 
Or maybe this is a good idea to limit our rants? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris - did you change the comment field or is it just me? It is now showing up very tiny in both Safari and Firefox on my Mac? Sorry for the IT interlude.<br />
Or maybe this is a good idea to limit our rants? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8227</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8227</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What this means is that students will no longer have to pay a whopping big price to the banks just for the banks to process some forms. &lt;/I&gt;

Yea, now the students will have to pay a whopping big price to the government..

It will also put the government in control of educational purse strings..

And ya&#039;all think this is a good idea....  WHY exactly??

As to the rest....  NO WHERE has Obama touched on the issues of JOBS, even though his SOTU address said that would be his &quot;TOP PRIORITY&quot;..

Why do you think that is??  Maybe because he wants to keep Americans poor and dependent on the government??  

I dunno...  No other reason is as logical as that one..

David,

&lt;I&gt;And keep emphasizing how Republicans have not been willing to work together in any way. &lt;/I&gt;

Republicans have clearly shown the country that they can work together..   But they CAN&#039;T work with Democrats who insist on pursuing the Dem agenda by hook or by crook..

And the independents in this country (like me), the ones who REALLY decide elections have clearly said they DON&#039;T want Republicans to work with Democrats until such time as Democrats remember who THEY (Dems) work for..  

The Democrats work for us, the American people.  

The Democrats seems to have forgotten that fact...

How else can you explain Democrats forcing legislation that 75% of Americans are against?


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What this means is that students will no longer have to pay a whopping big price to the banks just for the banks to process some forms. </i></p>
<p>Yea, now the students will have to pay a whopping big price to the government..</p>
<p>It will also put the government in control of educational purse strings..</p>
<p>And ya'all think this is a good idea....  WHY exactly??</p>
<p>As to the rest....  NO WHERE has Obama touched on the issues of JOBS, even though his SOTU address said that would be his "TOP PRIORITY"..</p>
<p>Why do you think that is??  Maybe because he wants to keep Americans poor and dependent on the government??  </p>
<p>I dunno...  No other reason is as logical as that one..</p>
<p>David,</p>
<p><i>And keep emphasizing how Republicans have not been willing to work together in any way. </i></p>
<p>Republicans have clearly shown the country that they can work together..   But they CAN'T work with Democrats who insist on pursuing the Dem agenda by hook or by crook..</p>
<p>And the independents in this country (like me), the ones who REALLY decide elections have clearly said they DON'T want Republicans to work with Democrats until such time as Democrats remember who THEY (Dems) work for..  </p>
<p>The Democrats work for us, the American people.  </p>
<p>The Democrats seems to have forgotten that fact...</p>
<p>How else can you explain Democrats forcing legislation that 75% of Americans are against?</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comment-8220</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755#comment-8220</guid>
		<description>Chris, 

This is great to see. It&#039;s like Keanu in the Matrix learning how to fight. Keep emphasizing the benefits. Keep getting the details out to folks - the ones they agree w/ once they get past the screaming talk show hosts. And keep emphasizing how Republicans have not been willing to work together in any way. 

If they stick with this playbook, I like their odds. 

As a big fan, I&#039;m also interested in seeing what the corporate noise machine churns out next to try and hide any details. Will it be another Reverend Wright? Will it be better than a phony birth certificate? Will it be more powerful than false accusations of socialism? 

C&#039;mon folks. Let&#039;s get creative. 

-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, </p>
<p>This is great to see. It's like Keanu in the Matrix learning how to fight. Keep emphasizing the benefits. Keep getting the details out to folks - the ones they agree w/ once they get past the screaming talk show hosts. And keep emphasizing how Republicans have not been willing to work together in any way. </p>
<p>If they stick with this playbook, I like their odds. </p>
<p>As a big fan, I'm also interested in seeing what the corporate noise machine churns out next to try and hide any details. Will it be another Reverend Wright? Will it be better than a phony birth certificate? Will it be more powerful than false accusations of socialism? </p>
<p>C'mon folks. Let's get creative. </p>
<p>-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
