<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading The 2009 Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/05/reading-the-2009-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/05/reading-the-2009-election/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/05/reading-the-2009-election/#comment-6558</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/05/reading-the-2009-election/#comment-6558</guid>
		<description>Michale -

I&#039;m starting here with catching up on some old comments.  See today&#039;s article (11/12), where I largely agree with you, although I think the &quot;climbing/falling&quot; part of it is going to be more important than the &quot;above 10%&quot; part.  I could be wrong, though.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale -</p>
<p>I'm starting here with catching up on some old comments.  See today's article (11/12), where I largely agree with you, although I think the "climbing/falling" part of it is going to be more important than the "above 10%" part.  I could be wrong, though.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/05/reading-the-2009-election/#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/05/reading-the-2009-election/#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>Barring any catastrophic event (a 9/11 or Katrina) or flare-up of combat overseas,  the mid-term elections will hinge on one thing and one thing only.

Jobs..

If unemployment is still above 10% (likely) and still climbing (possibly) then you can bet that the midterms of 1994 will seem subtle and inconsequential by comparison to the midterms of 2010.  


Remember, you heard it here first..  :D



Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barring any catastrophic event (a 9/11 or Katrina) or flare-up of combat overseas,  the mid-term elections will hinge on one thing and one thing only.</p>
<p>Jobs..</p>
<p>If unemployment is still above 10% (likely) and still climbing (possibly) then you can bet that the midterms of 1994 will seem subtle and inconsequential by comparison to the midterms of 2010.  </p>
<p>Remember, you heard it here first..  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
