<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What To Do About Joe Wilson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 02:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5970</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5970</guid>
		<description>Maureen Dowd&#039;s OpEd piece in the NY Times goes beyond the pale.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/opinion/13dowd.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion

In it, she suggests that Joe Wilson&#039;s outburst against President Obama was racially based.

{{{{ssssiiiiigggghhhhhh}}}}

This begs the question of Ms Dowd... And MANY MANY other Democrats who have the same mindset.

Is it possible that any criticism against Obama is NOT racially based?

In other words, can&#039;t anyone have ANY legitimate complaints against Obama without bringing race into the issue?

Maybe someone (anyone) here can field that...

Furthertheless...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;no Democrat ever shouted â€œliarâ€ at W. when he was hawking a fake case for war in Iraq &quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Ex-squeeze me??   

Baking Powder??

What planet has Dowd been living on for the past 8.6 years??

As has been established, Democrats up and down the ladder made calling the President a liar the national past-time during the Bush years.

Most times, Ms Dowd is right on, but she sure stepped on her wee-wee with this commentary.


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maureen Dowd's OpEd piece in the NY Times goes beyond the pale.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/opinion/13dowd.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/opinion/13dowd.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion</a></p>
<p>In it, she suggests that Joe Wilson's outburst against President Obama was racially based.</p>
<p>{{{{ssssiiiiigggghhhhhh}}}}</p>
<p>This begs the question of Ms Dowd... And MANY MANY other Democrats who have the same mindset.</p>
<p>Is it possible that any criticism against Obama is NOT racially based?</p>
<p>In other words, can't anyone have ANY legitimate complaints against Obama without bringing race into the issue?</p>
<p>Maybe someone (anyone) here can field that...</p>
<p>Furthertheless...</p>
<p><b>"no Democrat ever shouted â€œliarâ€ at W. when he was hawking a fake case for war in Iraq "</b></p>
<p>Ex-squeeze me??   </p>
<p>Baking Powder??</p>
<p>What planet has Dowd been living on for the past 8.6 years??</p>
<p>As has been established, Democrats up and down the ladder made calling the President a liar the national past-time during the Bush years.</p>
<p>Most times, Ms Dowd is right on, but she sure stepped on her wee-wee with this commentary.</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5947</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5947</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;With a political arms race in full force, Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) has raised almost $750,000 in less than 48 hours since his shout of &quot;You lie!&quot; to President Obama during the Wednesday address to Congress, almost matching the Internet-fueled haul of his likely Democratic opponent.&lt;/B&gt;

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/09/scs_wilson_rakes_in_750000_in.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>With a political arms race in full force, Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) has raised almost $750,000 in less than 48 hours since his shout of "You lie!" to President Obama during the Wednesday address to Congress, almost matching the Internet-fueled haul of his likely Democratic opponent.</b></p>
<p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/09/scs_wilson_rakes_in_750000_in.html" rel="nofollow">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/09/scs_wilson_rakes_in_750000_in.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5943</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5943</guid>
		<description>YeahRight,

My only point was how it is hypocritical for the Left to condemn GOP CongressCritters for calling the President a liar, when it was Dem CongressCritters who made a sport of calling President Bush a liar at every opportunity for nearly 8 years..

My opinion has ALWAYS been that one shows the President Of The United States the respect that said office deserves.

The prevailing opinion around here (certain exceptions noted) seems to be that one only shows respect to the office when one agrees with the office holder.

That&#039;s my story and I am sticking to it!  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YeahRight,</p>
<p>My only point was how it is hypocritical for the Left to condemn GOP CongressCritters for calling the President a liar, when it was Dem CongressCritters who made a sport of calling President Bush a liar at every opportunity for nearly 8 years..</p>
<p>My opinion has ALWAYS been that one shows the President Of The United States the respect that said office deserves.</p>
<p>The prevailing opinion around here (certain exceptions noted) seems to be that one only shows respect to the office when one agrees with the office holder.</p>
<p>That's my story and I am sticking to it!  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5941</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5941</guid>
		<description>Yeah right -

Please PLEASE don&#039;t give Congress tips on how to behave as children!

(Shudder)

They do enough of it all on their own as it is...

Heh heh.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah right -</p>
<p>Please PLEASE don't give Congress tips on how to behave as children!</p>
<p>(Shudder)</p>
<p>They do enough of it all on their own as it is...</p>
<p>Heh heh.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeah right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5940</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeah right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5940</guid>
		<description>Michale, This is America and of course one can say if they feel the presiden is lying. This is our duty to point it out. Jefferson, I believe said we must protect ourself from the tyranny of the government. Just as a nation supposedly built of ideas could seat with another man with competing ideas. -- could listen to his ideas. However, by no way would mock this man. Especially, if he happens to be the president of the United States on the floor of Congress. 

Now of all the critcs who are out there suggesting the president is a liar from my understanding wasn&#039;t he speaking to let the people both Democrats and Republicans know what type of bill he wanted to sign? Wasn&#039;t he there trying to build a bridge between the conservatives and liberals? If this is the case then to call him a liar for a bill that is not in anyway near finish is more than just rude it&#039;s a lie. And instead of Mr. Wilson taking the opportunity to listen to the president on a issue he fills strongly about the guy attacked him like a two year old kid.

So I have some advice for Mr. Wilson, if he wants to act like a child then so be it. The next time he feels that there is something in the bill that president said would not be in the bill, he should just tell the others in the house. BUT THE PRESIDENT SAID. Just I would have said to my older sisters when they were trying to break the rules.

There are two freedoms - the false, where a man is free to do what he likes; the true, where he is free to do what he ought.  ~Charles Kingsley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale, This is America and of course one can say if they feel the presiden is lying. This is our duty to point it out. Jefferson, I believe said we must protect ourself from the tyranny of the government. Just as a nation supposedly built of ideas could seat with another man with competing ideas. -- could listen to his ideas. However, by no way would mock this man. Especially, if he happens to be the president of the United States on the floor of Congress. </p>
<p>Now of all the critcs who are out there suggesting the president is a liar from my understanding wasn't he speaking to let the people both Democrats and Republicans know what type of bill he wanted to sign? Wasn't he there trying to build a bridge between the conservatives and liberals? If this is the case then to call him a liar for a bill that is not in anyway near finish is more than just rude it's a lie. And instead of Mr. Wilson taking the opportunity to listen to the president on a issue he fills strongly about the guy attacked him like a two year old kid.</p>
<p>So I have some advice for Mr. Wilson, if he wants to act like a child then so be it. The next time he feels that there is something in the bill that president said would not be in the bill, he should just tell the others in the house. BUT THE PRESIDENT SAID. Just I would have said to my older sisters when they were trying to break the rules.</p>
<p>There are two freedoms - the false, where a man is free to do what he likes; the true, where he is free to do what he ought.  ~Charles Kingsley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5939</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5939</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Ah, Michale, as I read this Chris post I thought to myself that you would make your usual &quot;what if the shoe were on the other foot&quot; argument. Sure enough, there you are flogging the same tired dead horse over seven of the eight comments up till now.&lt;/I&gt;

Hmmmmmm

Why is &quot;the shoe on the other foot&quot; argument a tired dead horse?

I would think that trying to apply the philosophy of the Left TO the left would be the epitome of fairness...

In other words, I am applying the ARGUMENTS of the Left to the ACTIONS of the Left..

The very definition, the very EPITOME of fairness... Wouldn&#039;t you agree?  :D

As for the rest..  While my comments appear to be &quot;sound bites&quot; and such, if you note the time stamps, you will see that they traverse the course of the day.  In essence, once new information (or different takes on old information) becomes available and it is relevant to the discussion at hand, I comment on it.

Annoying?  Probably.  I am the type that has to be taken to places twice.  The second time, to apologize.  :D

But the surest way to shut me up is to counter my arguments with facts and logical discourse.  Gods know I wouldn&#039;t want to be around a place where I always get my ass kicked, metaphorically/intellectually speaking.

For this particular discussion, there is only one question.

How can the Left castigate Wilson for calling President Obama a liar, when the Left made calling President Bush a liar (and worse) a national past time?

Surely, it&#039;s a fair and logical question, no??

So, what&#039;s the answer??

Still and always friends.. :D

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ah, Michale, as I read this Chris post I thought to myself that you would make your usual "what if the shoe were on the other foot" argument. Sure enough, there you are flogging the same tired dead horse over seven of the eight comments up till now.</i></p>
<p>Hmmmmmm</p>
<p>Why is "the shoe on the other foot" argument a tired dead horse?</p>
<p>I would think that trying to apply the philosophy of the Left TO the left would be the epitome of fairness...</p>
<p>In other words, I am applying the ARGUMENTS of the Left to the ACTIONS of the Left..</p>
<p>The very definition, the very EPITOME of fairness... Wouldn't you agree?  :D</p>
<p>As for the rest..  While my comments appear to be "sound bites" and such, if you note the time stamps, you will see that they traverse the course of the day.  In essence, once new information (or different takes on old information) becomes available and it is relevant to the discussion at hand, I comment on it.</p>
<p>Annoying?  Probably.  I am the type that has to be taken to places twice.  The second time, to apologize.  :D</p>
<p>But the surest way to shut me up is to counter my arguments with facts and logical discourse.  Gods know I wouldn't want to be around a place where I always get my ass kicked, metaphorically/intellectually speaking.</p>
<p>For this particular discussion, there is only one question.</p>
<p>How can the Left castigate Wilson for calling President Obama a liar, when the Left made calling President Bush a liar (and worse) a national past time?</p>
<p>Surely, it's a fair and logical question, no??</p>
<p>So, what's the answer??</p>
<p>Still and always friends.. :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinem2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5938</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinem2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5938</guid>
		<description>Ah, Michale, as I read this Chris post I thought to myself that you would make your usual &quot;what if the shoe were on the other foot&quot; argument. Sure enough, there you are flogging the same tired dead horse over seven of the eight comments up till now.
Unless Chris has comment length restrictions, could you possibly combine many of your comments into fewer, longer bites? Frankly, I&#039;m tired of seeing a Chris post with lots of comments listed and then finding out you&#039;re responsible for most of them. I&#039;m sorry to admit I now scroll over most of them unread because you keep saying the same thing with slight varience over and over again. I do appreciate your self-mocking moments and healthy knowledge of various aspects of geekdom, eg. Star Trek and the like. Still friends, but could you please be more succinct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Michale, as I read this Chris post I thought to myself that you would make your usual "what if the shoe were on the other foot" argument. Sure enough, there you are flogging the same tired dead horse over seven of the eight comments up till now.<br />
Unless Chris has comment length restrictions, could you possibly combine many of your comments into fewer, longer bites? Frankly, I'm tired of seeing a Chris post with lots of comments listed and then finding out you're responsible for most of them. I'm sorry to admit I now scroll over most of them unread because you keep saying the same thing with slight varience over and over again. I do appreciate your self-mocking moments and healthy knowledge of various aspects of geekdom, eg. Star Trek and the like. Still friends, but could you please be more succinct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5935</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5935</guid>
		<description>@Osborne Ink

From your OWN link...

&lt;B&gt;Under health care reform, illegal immigrants would be able to buy private insurance or the public option.&lt;/B&gt;

So, while Joe Wilson may have been wrong about Obama lying, it&#039;s clear from several different sourced reports, that Obama was mistaken when he said that &quot;the reforms Iâ€™m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.&quot;

&lt;B&gt;&quot;These are the facts.  And they are undisputed.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Captain Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Osborne Ink</p>
<p>From your OWN link...</p>
<p><b>Under health care reform, illegal immigrants would be able to buy private insurance or the public option.</b></p>
<p>So, while Joe Wilson may have been wrong about Obama lying, it's clear from several different sourced reports, that Obama was mistaken when he said that "the reforms Iâ€™m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally."</p>
<p><b>"These are the facts.  And they are undisputed."</b><br />
-Captain Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5933</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5933</guid>
		<description>For the record, I condemn Wilson&#039;s disrespect towards President Obama as clearly, forcefully and unequivocally as I did when I condemned Democratic Party leaders for their disrespect towards President Bush.  In that regard, I am now and have been completely and utterly consistent.  Probably the only one here who is..  :D

Having said that, I find it humorous in the extreme that Democrats would actually utter a peep about a GOP&#039;er telling President Obama, &quot;You Lie!&quot;.

It&#039;s funny because, during the 8 years of the Bush Presidency, Democrats up and down the spectrum made calling the President a liar a national past time.

So, seriously..  Anyone who didn&#039;t blast Democrats for calling President Bush a liar (and worse) has absolutely no moral or ethical leg to stand on in condemning Joe Wilson.  


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I condemn Wilson's disrespect towards President Obama as clearly, forcefully and unequivocally as I did when I condemned Democratic Party leaders for their disrespect towards President Bush.  In that regard, I am now and have been completely and utterly consistent.  Probably the only one here who is..  :D</p>
<p>Having said that, I find it humorous in the extreme that Democrats would actually utter a peep about a GOP'er telling President Obama, "You Lie!".</p>
<p>It's funny because, during the 8 years of the Bush Presidency, Democrats up and down the spectrum made calling the President a liar a national past time.</p>
<p>So, seriously..  Anyone who didn't blast Democrats for calling President Bush a liar (and worse) has absolutely no moral or ethical leg to stand on in condemning Joe Wilson.  </p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5931</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5931</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Another recourse actually being considered is a court martial. Joe is apparently a member of the reserves. And the military has very clear and concise language which says its members cannot badmouth their own military and civilian leaders â€” all the way up to the president. While, on the face of it, it would indeed seem that Joe broke these rules of conduct, it&#039;s a little hard to imagine the military getting involved in this political fracas. It could happen, but I wouldn&#039;t bet on it myself.&lt;/I&gt;

A point about this.

Apparently, Joe Wilson is a retired LT Colonel from the SC National Guard.

I don&#039;t believe that the UCMJ applies to retired personnel excepting where offenses were committed while they were sworn military officers.  Under those conditions, retired military personnel can be recalled to Active Duty and then face a Courts Martial.


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Another recourse actually being considered is a court martial. Joe is apparently a member of the reserves. And the military has very clear and concise language which says its members cannot badmouth their own military and civilian leaders â€” all the way up to the president. While, on the face of it, it would indeed seem that Joe broke these rules of conduct, it's a little hard to imagine the military getting involved in this political fracas. It could happen, but I wouldn't bet on it myself.</i></p>
<p>A point about this.</p>
<p>Apparently, Joe Wilson is a retired LT Colonel from the SC National Guard.</p>
<p>I don't believe that the UCMJ applies to retired personnel excepting where offenses were committed while they were sworn military officers.  Under those conditions, retired military personnel can be recalled to Active Duty and then face a Courts Martial.</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5929</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5929</guid>
		<description>Interesting reading...

&lt;B&gt;Is America Breaking Up&lt;/B&gt;
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=109478

Something I have been saying since 2006, I believe..


Michale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting reading...</p>
<p><b>Is America Breaking Up</b><br />
<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=109478" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=109478</a></p>
<p>Something I have been saying since 2006, I believe..</p>
<p>Michale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5927</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5927</guid>
		<description>I rest my case.

Obama was &quot;mistaken&quot;.

Bush &quot;lied&quot;.

Thanx for proving my point so eloquently.  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rest my case.</p>
<p>Obama was "mistaken".</p>
<p>Bush "lied".</p>
<p>Thanx for proving my point so eloquently.  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne Ink</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5922</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5922</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/sep/09/joe-wilson/joe-wilson-south-carolina-said-obama-lied-he-didnt/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe Wilson lied. Plain and simple.&lt;/a&gt;

There was actually one recorded instance of Democrats booing Bush during a joint session, but to be fair Bush was lying through his eyeteeth about the Social Security trust fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/sep/09/joe-wilson/joe-wilson-south-carolina-said-obama-lied-he-didnt/" rel="nofollow">Joe Wilson lied. Plain and simple.</a></p>
<p>There was actually one recorded instance of Democrats booing Bush during a joint session, but to be fair Bush was lying through his eyeteeth about the Social Security trust fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5920</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5920</guid>
		<description>I am also constrained to point out that, while President Obama wasn&#039;t outright lying (take note all those who accuse Bush of lying without a second thought) he WAS mistaken when he stated that DunselCare would not allow illegal immigrants to be given coverage.

The fact is that, because all of the House Bills do NOT have a requirement to prove citizenship to obtain healthcare benefits, there is absolutely NO structure in place to PREVENT illegal immigrants from obtaining healthcare. 

So, while President Obama was not (probably) lying, he WAS mistaken in his claim that no benefits would go to illegal immigrants...

At last report, this citizenship loophole is being addressed by the Senate Finance Committee...


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also constrained to point out that, while President Obama wasn't outright lying (take note all those who accuse Bush of lying without a second thought) he WAS mistaken when he stated that DunselCare would not allow illegal immigrants to be given coverage.</p>
<p>The fact is that, because all of the House Bills do NOT have a requirement to prove citizenship to obtain healthcare benefits, there is absolutely NO structure in place to PREVENT illegal immigrants from obtaining healthcare. </p>
<p>So, while President Obama was not (probably) lying, he WAS mistaken in his claim that no benefits would go to illegal immigrants...</p>
<p>At last report, this citizenship loophole is being addressed by the Senate Finance Committee...</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5918</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/10/what-to-do-about-joe-wilson/#comment-5918</guid>
		<description>How many Democrats boo&#039;ed Bush in his State Of The Union addresses??

Plenty..

How many times did Reid refer to Bush as a &quot;loser&quot; and a &quot;liar&quot;?

Plenty..

What Wilson did was disrespectful and un-called for, no question.

Democrats will make hay of it and get some mileage out of it, sure.

But let&#039;s keep things in perspective.  These things are nothing new.  They always happen in politics.  The only things that ever change is the perpetrator and the victim.

Democrats take the &quot;holier than thou&quot; attitude at their own risk...


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many Democrats boo'ed Bush in his State Of The Union addresses??</p>
<p>Plenty..</p>
<p>How many times did Reid refer to Bush as a "loser" and a "liar"?</p>
<p>Plenty..</p>
<p>What Wilson did was disrespectful and un-called for, no question.</p>
<p>Democrats will make hay of it and get some mileage out of it, sure.</p>
<p>But let's keep things in perspective.  These things are nothing new.  They always happen in politics.  The only things that ever change is the perpetrator and the victim.</p>
<p>Democrats take the "holier than thou" attitude at their own risk...</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
