Comments on: Obama Poll Watch [August 2009] -- Obama's Base Support Erodes

By: London The » Chris Weigant: Obama Poll Watch — February, 2010

London The » Chris Weigant: Obama Poll Watch — February, 2010 — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:55:43 +0000

[...] Archives [Jan 10], [Dec 09], [Nov 09], [Oct 09], [Sep 09], [Aug 09], [Jul 09], [Jun 09], [May 09], [Apr 09], [...]

By: London The » Chris Weigant: Obama Poll Watch — February, 2010

London The » Chris Weigant: Obama Poll Watch — February, 2010 — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:51:44 +0000

[...] [Dec 09], [Nov 09], [Oct 09], [Sep 09], [Aug 09], [Jul 09], [Jun 09], [May 09], [Apr 09], [...]

By: Chris Weigant: Obama Poll Watch — January, 2010

Chris Weigant: Obama Poll Watch — January, 2010 — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:18:42 +0000

[...] [Nov 09], [Oct 09], [Sep 09], [Aug 09], [Jul 09], [Jun 09], [May 09], [Apr 09], [...]

By: Chris Weigant: Obama Poll Watch — January, 2010 | Deconstructing The News

Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:16:30 +0000

[...] [Nov 09], [Oct 09], [Sep 09], [Aug 09], [Jul 09], [Jun 09], [May 09], [Apr 09], [...]

By: ChrisWeigant.com » Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2010

ChrisWeigant.com » Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2010 — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:44:48 +0000

[...] [Nov 09], [Oct 09], [Sep 09], [Aug 09], [Jul 09], [Jun 09], [May 09], [Apr 09], [...]

By: Michale

Michale — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:37:25 +0000

I swear, CW!!

The White House simply HAS to be reading your columns!!!

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AGJQ002&show_article=1

No other explanation fits! :D

Michale.....

By: Michale

Michale — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:26:13 +0000

I am curious as to what ya'all think regarding Obama's addressing schoolchildren next week?

Michale.....

By: Osborne Ink

Osborne Ink — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 03:14:42 +0000

Chris, your consistent honesty wins you an honest weblog award. Chris, I think you need to break down Obama's poll numbers with independents and progressives to get the full picture. Obama's lost support in the left due to uncertainty about the success of health care reform. I think they explain a lot of the softening. This was the central debate at Netroots Nation and it's the source of all the oh noes at HuffPo.

By: Michale

Michale — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:30:44 +0000

I would think that Bush's FIRST term would be the better comparison to Obama's first term. In Bush's first term at the corresponding date, there hadn't been any "catastrophes" (9/11, Katrina, etc etc) to skew the numbers. Correspondingly, Obama's first term, to date, is also free of any external skewing.. I say "external" because, while it can be argued that DunselCare is a catastrophe, it is a catastrophe of Obama's own making. Consequently, it can be logically and rationally argued that Obama's approval numbers in the here and now are no better than Bush's approval numbers at the same point in time of his first term, pre-9/11. And Obama's DISAPPROVAL numbers are actually higher than Bush's.. I tell ya, THAT'S gotta hit the Left where it hurts, eh? :D Michale...