<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First 100 Days Retrospective: Ford, Carter, Reagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 01:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: akadjian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4739</link>
		<dc:creator>akadjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4739</guid>
		<description>I find the first 100 days of Obama&#039;s presidency quite amazing. Not out of Obama-love, but because he&#039;s been able to accomplish anything despite the backlash from the corporate-owned media. 

Tune into most media outlets and you hear nothing but questions. Yet polls continue to show that he is popular and a majority agree with his decisions. 

I think he understands very well how he has to pick his battles in order to generate political capital for the next battle, something that often progressives seem to criticize him for. 

Yet at the same time, he is laying out a vision that will enable progressives to win in the future. 

In many ways, it is very GOP-like. Lay out your vision, choose which battles to fight, and work to shift the goal posts. 

Ignoring specific accomplishments, I have to say it&#039;s a welcome change to have a progressive in the Whitehouse who knows how to do this and to me this seems like his biggest accomplishment. 

In my heart I hope for more, but what&#039;s encouraging is that Obama might be able to get us there. The things that he has accomplished have won him support and this, in turn, may allow him to move further. 

From a process and leadership standpoint, he is starting to seem Reagan-esque. 

- David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the first 100 days of Obama's presidency quite amazing. Not out of Obama-love, but because he's been able to accomplish anything despite the backlash from the corporate-owned media. </p>
<p>Tune into most media outlets and you hear nothing but questions. Yet polls continue to show that he is popular and a majority agree with his decisions. </p>
<p>I think he understands very well how he has to pick his battles in order to generate political capital for the next battle, something that often progressives seem to criticize him for. </p>
<p>Yet at the same time, he is laying out a vision that will enable progressives to win in the future. </p>
<p>In many ways, it is very GOP-like. Lay out your vision, choose which battles to fight, and work to shift the goal posts. </p>
<p>Ignoring specific accomplishments, I have to say it's a welcome change to have a progressive in the Whitehouse who knows how to do this and to me this seems like his biggest accomplishment. </p>
<p>In my heart I hope for more, but what's encouraging is that Obama might be able to get us there. The things that he has accomplished have won him support and this, in turn, may allow him to move further. </p>
<p>From a process and leadership standpoint, he is starting to seem Reagan-esque. </p>
<p>- David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>First off, that hook to tomorrowâ€™s column here was very nice - I trust that many will finally make the rewarding transition from HP to chrisweigant.com!

I found the â€œlooking forward rather than looking backwardâ€ option to be very reminiscent, as well...though, President Obama was not the first in his administration to promote that route and acknowledge that the decisions to launch investigations into the actions of the Bush administration rightly rest with the Justice Department and Congress...care to guess who Iâ€™m talking about? 

And, I would suspect that, like Fordâ€™s pardon of Nixon, the way in which Obama is handling Bush administration accountability will be viewed by historians as similarly appropriate and necessary. That is not to say, however, that I think real and effective accountability will not come knocking on the doors of some very prominent Bush administration officials, in due course.

Iâ€™m sensing a distinct feeling of delayed deja vu with this installment of the first 100 days, insofar as there is an uncanny similarity in the â€œdaunting array of crisesâ€ that faced the new President on day one, so to speak...war, of one sort or another; economic malaise; and energy predicaments...kind of makes one wonder if, over the course of the last few decades, we havenâ€™t been taking one step forward and ten steps backward...ahem...and, Iâ€™m beginning to hope that Iâ€™m no longer around when the revised, historical take on the meaning of the GW Bush administration takes new shape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, that hook to tomorrowâ€™s column here was very nice - I trust that many will finally make the rewarding transition from HP to chrisweigant.com!</p>
<p>I found the â€œlooking forward rather than looking backwardâ€ option to be very reminiscent, as well...though, President Obama was not the first in his administration to promote that route and acknowledge that the decisions to launch investigations into the actions of the Bush administration rightly rest with the Justice Department and Congress...care to guess who Iâ€™m talking about? </p>
<p>And, I would suspect that, like Fordâ€™s pardon of Nixon, the way in which Obama is handling Bush administration accountability will be viewed by historians as similarly appropriate and necessary. That is not to say, however, that I think real and effective accountability will not come knocking on the doors of some very prominent Bush administration officials, in due course.</p>
<p>Iâ€™m sensing a distinct feeling of delayed deja vu with this installment of the first 100 days, insofar as there is an uncanny similarity in the â€œdaunting array of crisesâ€ that faced the new President on day one, so to speak...war, of one sort or another; economic malaise; and energy predicaments...kind of makes one wonder if, over the course of the last few decades, we havenâ€™t been taking one step forward and ten steps backward...ahem...and, Iâ€™m beginning to hope that Iâ€™m no longer around when the revised, historical take on the meaning of the GW Bush administration takes new shape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinem2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinem2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I didn&#039;t make myself clear....I was wondering if you had the necessary academic credentials to be a PoliSci prof. If not, I think you should look into it...I think you&#039;d make a great professor.

And thanks for making me feel older than I already do :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I didn't make myself clear....I was wondering if you had the necessary academic credentials to be a PoliSci prof. If not, I think you should look into it...I think you'd make a great professor.</p>
<p>And thanks for making me feel older than I already do :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne Ink</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4730</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4730</guid>
		<description>Great blog, Chris. The summation at the end reminds me of the questions Stephen J. Gould had before the millennium about why we put so much stock in what are really artificial measures of time. Why not judge Obama by his first six months, or his first 90 days? Why 100? Is the human desire for symmetry that powerful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog, Chris. The summation at the end reminds me of the questions Stephen J. Gould had before the millennium about why we put so much stock in what are really artificial measures of time. Why not judge Obama by his first six months, or his first 90 days? Why 100? Is the human desire for symmetry that powerful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>kevinem2 -

If you&#039;re looking for some sort of connection, I am afraid I&#039;m going to have to disappoint you.  I was in elementary school in the early 1970s.

This piece (and tomorrow&#039;s ...Same bat time! ...Same bat channel!) was written because while I had seen a lot of articles pick and choose from other presidents&#039; &quot;first 100 days&quot; (most focus on FDR or JFK), I wanted to get some sort of recent perspective on it.  Since I was looking into it myself out of curiousity, I thought I&#039;d share my notes in case anyone else was interested.  

Oh, and to everyone: Sorry for the lack of links, got these articles through a subscription service.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kevinem2 -</p>
<p>If you're looking for some sort of connection, I am afraid I'm going to have to disappoint you.  I was in elementary school in the early 1970s.</p>
<p>This piece (and tomorrow's ...Same bat time! ...Same bat channel!) was written because while I had seen a lot of articles pick and choose from other presidents' "first 100 days" (most focus on FDR or JFK), I wanted to get some sort of recent perspective on it.  Since I was looking into it myself out of curiousity, I thought I'd share my notes in case anyone else was interested.  </p>
<p>Oh, and to everyone: Sorry for the lack of links, got these articles through a subscription service.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fstanley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>fstanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>Logically, I know that the first 100 days is not an indicator of how good a Presidency will be in the long run.  However, when so much depends on how/what President Obama is doing it is difficult not to be critical at times.

...Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logically, I know that the first 100 days is not an indicator of how good a Presidency will be in the long run.  However, when so much depends on how/what President Obama is doing it is difficult not to be critical at times.</p>
<p>...Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinem2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinem2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>Chris,

What is your educational background? This piece reminded me of a Political Science professor
I had in the early 1970&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>What is your educational background? This piece reminded me of a Political Science professor<br />
I had in the early 1970's.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
