<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymity Of &quot;Obama Is A Muslim&quot; Emails Constitutionally-Protected?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:55:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kevinem2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinem2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>I knew about that, and am sympathetic; any chance you could take over their duties until the new baby sleeps at night?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew about that, and am sympathetic; any chance you could take over their duties until the new baby sleeps at night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>kevinem2 -

I believe the guy who writes the Top 10 just had a new addition to the family, as his wife just had a baby.  I can only assume he&#039;s going through the no-sleep world of midnight feedings right now...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kevinem2 -</p>
<p>I believe the guy who writes the Top 10 just had a new addition to the family, as his wife just had a baby.  I can only assume he's going through the no-sleep world of midnight feedings right now...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinem2</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinem2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>Chris..Do you have any insider information on when Democratic Underground will revive their Top 10 Conservative Idiots feature? I check their site everyday and so far no joy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris..Do you have any insider information on when Democratic Underground will revive their Top 10 Conservative Idiots feature? I check their site everyday and so far no joy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>So, let me get this straight..

It&#039;s DEMOCRATS who are leading the charge against what could be construed as a FREE SPEECH issue!!????

OHMIGOD!!!  STOP THE WORLD!!! I WANT TO GET OFF!!!!!


:D

Seriously, this is becoming Kafka-esque...  Democrats are screaming, &quot;TO HELL WITH THE CRIMINAL&#039;S RIGHTS!!  THINK OF THE VICTIM!!!&quot;

Who woulda thunked it...

Too bad that Dems can&#039;t garner up the courage to have this attitude on things that REALLY matter..

But,  baby steps..  baby steps....


Michale.....


&lt;B&gt;Crossposted to HuffPo&lt;/B&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let me get this straight..</p>
<p>It's DEMOCRATS who are leading the charge against what could be construed as a FREE SPEECH issue!!????</p>
<p>OHMIGOD!!!  STOP THE WORLD!!! I WANT TO GET OFF!!!!!</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Seriously, this is becoming Kafka-esque...  Democrats are screaming, "TO HELL WITH THE CRIMINAL'S RIGHTS!!  THINK OF THE VICTIM!!!"</p>
<p>Who woulda thunked it...</p>
<p>Too bad that Dems can't garner up the courage to have this attitude on things that REALLY matter..</p>
<p>But,  baby steps..  baby steps....</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
<p><b>Crossposted to HuffPo</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne Ink</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a firm believer in star chamber justice for all spammers, commercial or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a firm believer in star chamber justice for all spammers, commercial or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benevolent_Sociopath</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>Benevolent_Sociopath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2008/11/10/daily54.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2008/11/10/daily54.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2008/11/10/daily54.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fstanley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator>fstanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4125</guid>
		<description>I thnk that as a protection against retribution anonymity can be a good thing.  However, if the &quot;speech&quot; is shown to be false there should be some legal method to protect those being libeled.

...Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thnk that as a protection against retribution anonymity can be a good thing.  However, if the "speech" is shown to be false there should be some legal method to protect those being libeled.</p>
<p>...Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4124</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4124</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ELECTION UPDATE!!&lt;/strong&gt;

Mark Begich is now leading Ted Stevens in Alaska.  As of 5:12 PM, Pacific, it stands at:

125,019 - Begich
125,016 - Stevens

But they&#039;ve got tens of thousands more votes to count, so this could go either way.  Still, &quot;Begich leads&quot; is fun to write...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ELECTION UPDATE!!</strong></p>
<p>Mark Begich is now leading Ted Stevens in Alaska.  As of 5:12 PM, Pacific, it stands at:</p>
<p>125,019 - Begich<br />
125,016 - Stevens</p>
<p>But they've got tens of thousands more votes to count, so this could go either way.  Still, "Begich leads" is fun to write...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4123</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comment-4123</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ELECTION UPDATE!&lt;/strong&gt;

Ted Stevens&#039; lead in the race for the Alaska Senate seat is now less than 1,000 votes.

Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.aol.com/elections/2008/senate&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; and reload to see the votes come in (today&#039;s countin&#039; day up in AK).

Nobody else seems to have picked up on this.  When the day started, Stevens had a 3,257 vote lead (from memory).  So Begich seems to be catching up... but they&#039;ve got a LOT more ballots to count, so check back often tonight and in the next few days...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ELECTION UPDATE!</strong></p>
<p>Ted Stevens' lead in the race for the Alaska Senate seat is now less than 1,000 votes.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://news.aol.com/elections/2008/senate" rel="nofollow">this page</a> and reload to see the votes come in (today's countin' day up in AK).</p>
<p>Nobody else seems to have picked up on this.  When the day started, Stevens had a 3,257 vote lead (from memory).  So Begich seems to be catching up... but they've got a LOT more ballots to count, so check back often tonight and in the next few days...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
