<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electoral Math, From Knucklebiter To Landslide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 17:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>Allen -

Thanks for posting this.  This is an extremely cool site, and I recommend it to anyone not scared of statistics.  I will be watching it for the next few months.  Again, thanks for posting these links!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen -</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this.  This is an extremely cool site, and I recommend it to anyone not scared of statistics.  I will be watching it for the next few months.  Again, thanks for posting these links!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a website that computes the probability of each candidate winning the election based on recent poll data.  It also ranks the states most likely to swing the outcome:

  http://election-projection.net

The best feature though might be the interactive probability calculator:

  http://election-projection.net/interactive.html

This lets you run your own numbers and see what the likely election outcome will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a website that computes the probability of each candidate winning the election based on recent poll data.  It also ranks the states most likely to swing the outcome:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://election-projection.net" rel="nofollow">http://election-projection.net</a></p>
<p>The best feature though might be the interactive probability calculator:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://election-projection.net/interactive.html" rel="nofollow">http://election-projection.net/interactive.html</a></p>
<p>This lets you run your own numbers and see what the likely election outcome will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLaws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>BLaws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>My prediction (barring any major event outside of the campaigns&#039; control):

Obama:
AK, WA, OR, CA, CO, NM, NV, MN, IA, WI, IL, MI, IN, OH, VA, NC, GA, PA, NY, ME, VT, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC, HI, MO, NE(1)

McCain:
MT, ID, UT, AZ, WY, ND, SD, NE(4), KS, OK, TX, AR, LA, MS, KY, TN, AL, SC, FL, WV

Obama: 367
McCain: 171</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My prediction (barring any major event outside of the campaigns' control):</p>
<p>Obama:<br />
AK, WA, OR, CA, CO, NM, NV, MN, IA, WI, IL, MI, IN, OH, VA, NC, GA, PA, NY, ME, VT, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC, HI, MO, NE(1)</p>
<p>McCain:<br />
MT, ID, UT, AZ, WY, ND, SD, NE(4), KS, OK, TX, AR, LA, MS, KY, TN, AL, SC, FL, WV</p>
<p>Obama: 367<br />
McCain: 171</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Before we get to crystal ball gazing, though, we have to clean up some old business here. I ran a contest (right before the Pennsylvania primaries) to see who could predict the outcome of the Democratic nomination race most accurately. Since the race has been over for weeks, and since I have been remiss in announcing winners, I&#039;d like to kick off the general election prognosticating by giving the winners and near-winners from the primary campaign their due.&lt;/I&gt;

Geee CW....

I would have thought that I would have at least merited an honorable mention for the worst case of prognostication, the most quatloos lost and the pic voted most likely to scare small children!! {pout} hehehehehe :D

Since I am not adverse to embarrassing myself further, I predict a knuckle biter with an Obama win.. This is based on the fact that Hillary&#039;s PUMA crowd seems to be losing steam...

Of course, there are at least 2 possible random events that could skew the results.. One would be massive riots at the Dem Convention in Denver. The other would be a devastating terror attack on US soil... Either of those events happen and all bets are off...

Michale.....


{cross posted to Huffington Post}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Before we get to crystal ball gazing, though, we have to clean up some old business here. I ran a contest (right before the Pennsylvania primaries) to see who could predict the outcome of the Democratic nomination race most accurately. Since the race has been over for weeks, and since I have been remiss in announcing winners, I'd like to kick off the general election prognosticating by giving the winners and near-winners from the primary campaign their due.</i></p>
<p>Geee CW....</p>
<p>I would have thought that I would have at least merited an honorable mention for the worst case of prognostication, the most quatloos lost and the pic voted most likely to scare small children!! {pout} hehehehehe :D</p>
<p>Since I am not adverse to embarrassing myself further, I predict a knuckle biter with an Obama win.. This is based on the fact that Hillary's PUMA crowd seems to be losing steam...</p>
<p>Of course, there are at least 2 possible random events that could skew the results.. One would be massive riots at the Dem Convention in Denver. The other would be a devastating terror attack on US soil... Either of those events happen and all bets are off...</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
<p>{cross posted to Huffington Post}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fstanley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>fstanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/30/electoral-math-from-knucklebiter-to-landslide/#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>This method of electing a President really needs to end.  Getting rid of the electoral college is one change I would like to see when we have a new President.  In the meantime I will have to close my eyes and throw darts at the board to come up with some picks.

...Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This method of electing a President really needs to end.  Getting rid of the electoral college is one change I would like to see when we have a new President.  In the meantime I will have to close my eyes and throw darts at the board to come up with some picks.</p>
<p>...Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
