Comments on: Friday Talking Points [20] -- Populism 101 http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/ Reality-based political commentary Wed, 06 May 2026 04:08:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/#comment-1846 Michale Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:17:50 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/#comment-1846 Between the "Plagiarism" accusation and this pathetic hit piece.... http://www.drudgereport.com/flashoa.htm ..... who can deny that Hillary is desperate?? Michale..... Between the "Plagiarism" accusation and this pathetic hit piece....

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashoa.htm

..... who can deny that Hillary is desperate??

Michale.....

]]> By: Michale http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/#comment-1845 Michale Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:56:01 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/#comment-1845 I find it hilarious how, during the MCA discussions and debates, McCain was the Dems hero... Iddn't it funny... :D On another note, another funny one... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,332155,00.html Replace "Musharraf" with "Clinton" and the article still works! :D Michale..... I find it hilarious how, during the MCA discussions and debates, McCain was the Dems hero...

Iddn't it funny... :D

On another note, another funny one...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,332155,00.html

Replace "Musharraf" with "Clinton" and the article still works! :D

Michale.....

]]> By: benskull http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/#comment-1842 benskull Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:00:55 +0000 http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/#comment-1842 good talking points. I must say, I've been disappointed about the media storm with the McCain article. While I agree that adding the vague unconfirmed bit about the affair was irresponsible, I think the point was clear, and I'm pissed that tv news isn't really discussing it. That mccain preaching about fighting special interests etc is a bunch if bull. Its basically revealing the truth behind his PR image. Thus should definitely be talked about by the dem candidates, though the type of attention on the subject has probably scared them. Nonetheless, do we want a government that represents the people? Or that represents special interests? The last eight years should answer that. And a quick added note, anyone see christine Whitman talking about the bush white house? Pretty interesting. good talking points. I must say, I've been disappointed about the media storm with the McCain article. While I agree that adding the vague unconfirmed bit about the affair was irresponsible, I think the point was clear, and I'm pissed that tv news isn't really discussing it. That mccain preaching about fighting special interests etc is a bunch if bull. Its basically revealing the truth behind his PR image. Thus should definitely be talked about by the dem candidates, though the type of attention on the subject has probably scared them. Nonetheless, do we want a government that represents the people? Or that represents special interests? The last eight years should answer that. And a quick added note, anyone see christine Whitman talking about the bush white house? Pretty interesting.

]]>